Florida Police Departments Spent Thousands on Training Seminars Banned in 9 States
A New Jersey government watchdog said Street Cop Training instructors glorified violence, made discriminatory remarks, and offered unprofessional and unconstitutional advice to officers.

Police and sheriff's departments across Florida spent thousands of dollars sending officers to training conferences that have been banned in nine other states after being accused of promoting unconstitutional tactics and glorifying violence.
Reason obtained invoices through public records requests showing that a dozen of Florida's largest law enforcement agencies spent $31,377 on training seminars hosted by Street Cop Training, a New Jersey-based company, between 2020 and 2023.
The company has been under intense scrutiny since the New Jersey Office of the State Comptroller issued a scathing report in December detailing a 2021 Street Cop Training conference in Atlantic City where instructors made discriminatory and unprofessional remarks. At the conference, one instructor flashed a picture of a monkey when talking about an elderly black man, and the founder of the company said that refusing to consent to a police search was justification for prolonging an investigation. Since then, New Jersey has ordered retraining for all officers who attended Street Cop conferences, and the company has declared bankruptcy.
The Florida invoices shed light on Street Cop's foothold in one of the most populous states. Despite the turbulent times for the company, it is soldiering on in the Sunshine State. As Florida Today's John Torres noted in a recent op-ed, Orlando is hosting the 2024 Street Cop Conference this week.
Not only that, but Brevard County Sheriff Wayne Ivey is a speaker at the conference.
Torres noted with disdain that taxpayers were footing the bill to send officers to these conferences.
"Locally, at least one Melbourne officer is attending the training with the department paying for it," Torres wrote. "Palm Bay and Cocoa have none and the Brevard County Sheriff's Department did not respond to my inquiry about how many deputies were attending. The Florida Department of Law Enforcement could not tell me how many officers were attending."
It would probably not surprise Torres to learn that the Brevard County Sheriff's Office spent the most out of any agency that has so far responded to Reason's records requests. Street Cop invoices to the agency total $7,825 between 2020 and 2023.
The next biggest spender was the Osceola County Sheriff's Office with $7,085, followed by the Seminole County Sheriff's Department at $6,604.
Six Florida Highway Patrol officers attended Street Cop training seminars during that time period, according to records.
To compile this report, Reason filed 28 public records requests to the largest police departments and sheriff's offices in Florida. Nine agencies said they had no responsive records. Seven requests are still pending, including from populous jurisdictions such as Broward and Orange County.
Street Cop Training was founded in 2012 by Dennis Benigno, a former New Jersey police officer. It runs training conferences for thousands of police officers around the country, but flew under the radar until New Jersey Comptroller Kevin Walsh's December report. The report documented dozens upon dozens of lewd and discriminatory remarks by instructors and comments glorifying violence.
More concerning than the constant middle-school jokes about penis size, though, were the substance of the presentations. For example, Benigno and other instructors at the Atlantic City conference insisted that refusing to consent to a search of one's vehicle—a constitutional right under the Fourth Amendment—was suspicious and should be used as justification for prolonging a search or detention.
The comptroller investigation found that there was "an entire section of Benigno's training during the Conference dedicated to an 'I Do Not Consent Game,' during which Benigno shows a montage of people refusing consent in an attempt to illustrate that a motorist's refusal to consent is a suspicious factor that justifies further prolonging an investigative detention."
The comptroller's office found that multiple instructors told officers to use a "reasonable suspicion" checklist to decide whether to find a reason to pull someone over or extend a traffic stop. The checklist included a long list of vague and contradictory behavior, including the driver not looking at a police car when passing, looking too long at a police car when passing, wearing a hat, removing a hat when an officer approaches, looking back at their vehicle, leaning against their vehicle, smoking, stretching or yawning, and licking their lips.
"Because none of these factors are more consistent with guilt than innocence, a stop based on a combination of those factors alone—without some additional factor that suggests criminality—would be unconstitutional," the New Jersey Comptroller's Office concluded.
Benigno also mocked people who record the police during traffic stops, saying that person was about to "get pepper sprayed, fucking tased, windows broken out, motherfucker." Recording the police is a First Amendment right.
One Street Cop instructor in Louisiana livestreamed himself shooting at a fleeing vehicle and later bragged about it at the Atlantic City conference. "Run from me, somewhere along the chase becomes, pow, pow, pow, pow, pow, pow, pow," he said. The deputy has since been charged with illegal discharge of a firearm and obstruction of justice.
The report found that at least New Jersey spent at least $75,000 in public funds sending officers to the Atlantic City conference.
Benigno said in the wake of the report that he was tightening professional standards for the conferences and making other changes, but he denied that the company promoted unconstitutional tactics.
In a lengthy statement to Florida news outlet WESH last week, Benigno said in part: "The context of the Fourth Amendment training at the October conference and the implications that the training was unconstitutional is completely baseless. Officers in attendance have already completed police academy and understand the context in which the training is provided."
Not all of the public records identify which seminars officers attended, but at least some of them involved traffic stops and interdiction. One officer from the Tallahassee Police Department attended a 2021 Street Cop Training class titled "identifying criminal vehicles and occupants," and a Duval County Sheriff's deputy attended "interdiction mastermind."
The Volusia Sheriff's Office paid for five deputies to attend seminars that included "unmasking facial expressions" and "body language for law enforcement."
The ability to reliably detect lies or guilt by reading facial expressions and body language has never been replicated in controlled studies. It's pseudo-science, but it has nevertheless remained popular among law enforcement because it gives officers a wide-ranging and often contradictory list of cues to confirm their suspicions. (Walsh's report also notes that "some other controversial factors [on the checklist] are observing 'micro-expressions' as taught through free online videos and assessing 'blink rate.'")
The controversy over Street Cop Training has led some Florida sheriff's offices to distance themselves from the company.
A spokesperson for the Seminole County Sheriff's Office says none of its members will be presenting or attending this year. The Volusia County Sheriff also told local media that he wouldn't be sending deputies to the conference.
Meanwhile, Brevard County Sheriff Wayne Ivey remains a staunch defender of the company.
"This is all a bunch of crap," Ivey said of Walsh's report.
Ivey was a paid consultant at a Street Cop conference last year in Nashville.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
that have been banned in nine other states after being accused of promoting unconstitutional tactics and glorifying violence.
Not exactly lead paragraph material. Maybe a context paragraph later on but you no what is also banned in about 9 states, weed. And thank god my state ain't one of them (anymore), but I'm guessing some floridaman is saying the same about this.
Benigno and other instructors at the Atlantic City conference insisted that refusing to consent to a search of one's vehicle—a constitutional right under the Fourth Amendment—was suspicious and should be used as justification for prolonging a search or detention./i>
See this should be the lead. Followed by more examples. Not some other state banned it, that tells me nothing and quite frankly makes me think, its probably CA and NY... and they are experiencing a little bit of buyers remorse for some of their more outlandish criminal justice reforms.
No society can exist unless the laws are respected to a certain degree. The safest way to make laws respected is to make them respectable. When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law. These two evils are of equal consequence, and it would be difficult for a person to choose between them.
-Bastiat
It is pretty clear that a requirement for being a police officer is losing both.
The qualifiers are fogging a mirror and having at least 75% bone in the skull.
First off, Florida man don't give one single damn what a New Jersey person thinks about anything.
Second, try to rewrite this without all the references to what New Jersey cops did/said, and without what New Jersey trainers said anywhere.
Tell us what Florida did. Makes a mighty short piece, don't it?
Is this where they teach cops to all yell profanity laced contradictory orders to a suspect so they can claim he wasn’t complying when they beat or shoot him?
Yes.
So is nine the floor or is it actually lower? Is this a general rule for you or just for things you don't like? How exactly is criminal justice reform of any kind supposed to come about if more than 9 states engage in something or ban something?
Seems like every time one of our heroes is forced to strangle a guy selling loosies to keep the peace, I'm assured that we need more hero training. So we invest in hero training and libertarians bitch about it. I think I speak for all right thinking Americans when I ask, what the fuck do you people want?
I think I speak for all right thinking Americans when I ask, what the fuck do you people want?
For “Ignorance of the law is no excuse” to extend to those who enforce it. Maybe hold them to a higher standard. An equal standard. Any standard.
This is a weirdly unfocused article. Author should talk to his doctor, the new meds aren't helping with his focus.
So, I'm not saying a shite cop training is a good thing. In fact, I very often note how bad police training and culture are to blame, or partially to blame, for an awful lot.
But what does Florida have to do with it? Is it bad that various law enforcement agencies in Florida paid a total of $30K to this agency author doesn't like? OK. But New Jersey, a state far smaller with maybe 40% the population of Florida spent $75K with this agency, and did so DURING THE SAME PERIOD. So why Florida in the headline? And why is Florida the main focus?
So many things could be of interest to a libertarian here, but instead it's "Hurr durr Florida iz dum amirite?" at the start. Why? Think of things that you could actually focus on.
Are there other law enforcement agencies still using this company? Ones outside Florida, I mean. There's no way a company like this is surviving on just $30K in revenue over a three year period, so what else do we know about them?
Is the problem the tactics themselves? Who uses them? Who else teaches them? Is there some sort of graft? Or is it a conflict of interest a government official (Sheriff) double dipping teaching for a private consultancy? These sorts of things are interesting topics to libertarians, especially these days.
Instead, it's all Florida focused, and feels like a hit. Which waters down those aspects.
What about Sheriff Ivy's statement -- the full statement, not the one you cut down to make it sound like he's one of them as opposed to stating clearly that he didn't witness any unethical behavior at last year's conference. Did you follow up? Did you get his full opinion, including that he is bringing officers to the next one? Also, last year's was in Nashville, did you ping Tennessee to find out how many of their police forces attended that conference, and are you castigating them for allowing this conference in their state like you are for Florida allowing it this year?
The best we get are links to a report from a local television news crew. If reason is just going to repeat what someone else says, why did you even bother to make a public records request? Or is it just because Florida has easy, open public records laws so it was super easy compared to the other 49 states so you went the laziest route?
This article needs an editor even more than my own lengthy comment section post does.
I'm not the author, but here is my speculation regarding answers to some of your questions:
But what does Florida have to do with it? Is it bad that various law enforcement agencies in Florida paid a total of $30K to this agency author doesn’t like? OK. But New Jersey, a state far smaller with maybe 40% the population of Florida spent $75K with this agency, and did so DURING THE SAME PERIOD. So why Florida in the headline? And why is Florida the main focus?
Florida was likely the main focus because they're hosting the conference this year. And NJ paid that much during the reported period, but given NJ released the report railing against the company/conference just this past December, chances are the NJ payments to the company will not be at that level going forward (it would be good to see actual numbers to that effect, though).
Are there other law enforcement agencies still using this company? Ones outside Florida, I mean.
I'm sure there are, but that would take exponentially more FOIA requests and time to reveal.
Also, last year’s was in Nashville, did you ping Tennessee to find out how many of their police forces attended that conference, and are you castigating them for allowing this conference in their state like you are for Florida allowing it this year?
The reason behind the castigation of Florida would not lend itself to giving the same treatment to Tennessee. The issues with the conference were not known in general when Tennessee held the conference. It is the release of the NJ Comptroller's report as part of the Police Accountability Project that brought this to light for most people.
What about Sheriff Ivy’s statement — the full statement, not the one you cut down to make it sound like he’s one of them as opposed to stating clearly that he didn’t witness any unethical behavior at last year’s conference.
That reduces his credibility to the point that what they released looks "less bad" than if they had included this statement from him.
I agree with most of your other questions, but the ones above seem out of place IMO.
I'm guessing the same states that also ban the use of guns for self-defense (and in the other article).
Right-wing bigots gonna bigot. Especially in Florida.
Until replacement
$31,000?! Over 3 years? That's not even enough to get a congressperson to crawl out of bed.
one instructor flashed a picture of a monkey when talking about an elderly black man
I'm am very critical of police, but this is tripping my BS detector. Context? It is a slide of an orangutan (I think) in a sweater with a stressed/confused expression that says "Simple Questions... Simple Answers"
I bet the cop had no racist intent and the racists are the ones making the connection between the black man and the orangutan,
see it here: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12837205/New-Jersey-cops-seminar-glorified-violence.html
I bet the cop had no racist intent and the racists are the ones making the connection between the black man and the orangutan
That tracks. Leftists always complain about the racist dog whistles, but seem to be the only ones capable of hearing them.
Training street cops how to be street cops. Oh, the humanity! Those nine states banning it are probably California, Oregon, Washington, New York, New Jersey, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, Pennsylvania - blue states with high crime. If they refuse to use it, that is the best advertisement.
The comptroller's office found that multiple instructors told officers to use a "reasonable suspicion" checklist to decide whether to find a reason to pull someone over or extend a traffic stop. The checklist included a long list of vague and contradictory behavior, including the driver not looking at a police car when passing, looking too long at a police car when passing, wearing a hat, removing a hat when an officer approaches, looking back at their vehicle, leaning against their vehicle, smoking, stretching or yawning, and licking their lips.
"Because none of these factors are more consistent with guilt than innocence, a stop based on a combination of those factors alone—without some additional factor that suggests criminality—would be unconstitutional," the New Jersey Comptroller's Office concluded.
--------------
Their point is this is so stupid ... even Calif & NY banned it, and you *know* what they do over there.
8 States. I don’t count Spew Jersey as a state when it comes to policing.