Alabama Woman Arrested for Refusing To Give a Cop Her I.D.
Alabama law doesn't let police demand individuals' government identification. But they keep arresting people anyway.

In February, police officer John Barton arrested Twyla Stallworth in Andalusia, Alabama, because she refused to give him her photo identification. The only problem? Barton had no legal basis to demand Stallworth fork over her I.D.
Stallworth's arrest is just the latest in a series of false arrests in Alabama that have stemmed from a misinterpretation of the state's 2006 "stop and identify law," which allows police, when they have reasonable suspicion that a crime is taking place, to demand individuals provide their name, address, and an explanation of their actions—but not their photo I.D.
It's not entirely clear how Barton ended up at Stallworth's home on February 23. A lawsuit filed by Stallworth earlier this month does not provide background on the incident, and video filmed by Stallworth's 18-year-old son Jermari starts after Barton had come to Stallworth's door. According to USA Today, Stallworth's lawyers say that the confrontation started when she called to complain about a neighbor's loud music.
However, even if Barton had some reason to believe Stallworth might have been committing a crime—something that is possible but seems unlikely given Stallworth was in her own home—he still wouldn't have been able to demand her I.D.
"Give me an I.D. or go to jail," Barton told Stallworth, who incredulously responded, "I'm going to jail for not providing my I.D."
In the video of the incident, Barton is seen pushing Jermari away and attempting to handcuff Stallworth.
"Don't push my son! What's wrong with you? You will not push my son!" Stallworth yelled.
A struggle ensued, during which Barton "physically assaulted Ms. Stallworth by shoving her down on a couch," according to the lawsuit.
After Stallworth had been arrested, video shows Jermari asking Barton to see the statute he claims Stallworth violated: "I actually want to see this law in play," he says.
The statute, which Barton pulled up on his phone, allows police to "stop any person abroad in a public place whom he reasonably suspects is committing, has committed or is about to commit a felony or other public offense and may demand of him his name, address and an explanation of his actions."
"I don't see where it says anything about an I.D.," Jermari says. "It says your name, address, and an explanation."
"She failed to identify," Barton replied.
"I mean it doesn't specifically, you know, say an I.D.," Jermari added before Barton cut in: "I know, but I'm not going to argue with you either."
Despite Stallworth's son pointing out the obvious—that Stallworth hadn't broken the Alabama identification law—she was still charged with "obstruction, resisting arrest, and eluding," according to the lawsuit. The charges have since been dropped.
On March 8, Mayor of Andalusia Earl Johnson issued a formal apology to Stallworth, saying, "I would like to apologize to Twyla Stallworth for her arrest in February. All charges against Ms. Stallworth are being dropped." Johnson noted that Barton "has been disciplined for failing in his duty to know the law."
This is far from the first time that Alabama cops have misinterpreted the state's "stop and identify" law, wrongfully arresting individuals for not forking over their photo identifications. A man who was watering his neighbor's plants was arrested after refusing to give an officer his I.D. in May 2022. Last October, a federal court refused to grant qualified immunity to police officers who arrested a mechanic who refused to provide a government I.D. in 2019.
"The police are free to ask questions, and the public is free to ignore them," wrote 11th Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Charles R. Wilson in that last case. "Any legal obligation to speak to the police and answer their questions arises as a matter of state law."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Hey, they dropped the charges, so no foul, right sarc?
Oh he'll have backup from the badge lickers and racists.
Reason is always harping on these stories... and I suppose with good reason.
But Reason will never tell you about the thousands rotting away in New York Prisons for simply keeping and bearing arms.... Never ever.
Fuck Reason... They are just wolves in Ron Paul clothing.
Imagine if this happened on a college campus. Emma's head would have exploded
Funny. Funny guy.
You crack jokes about the deceased at their funeral too?
Cops overstepping legal limitations isn't funny. It's why Alabama can't have nice things.
You crack jokes about the deceased at their funeral too?
Depends, were they assholes?
No, did they have depends on their assholes?
How about 3 letter agency agents and prosecutors, and judges?
Sarc sees no good guys here.
The good guys are those who refuse to obey illegal commands... Just because the Commanders of the Police State wear uniforms!
The BAD guys are those who CUNTSTANTLY make lame-ass excuses for the Police State!
She is the one that called the cops in the first place, on her neighbors
So if you called the cops in the first place, the cops are allowed to treat you in ANY way that they like? Are the law enforcers required to follow the laws, or not? Who will police the police?
To be fair, while it's illegal, it's come to be expected. That she didn't know dialing 911 means opening yourself up to all manner of high testosterone cop bullshit is bad on her.
Wood alcohol does cause blindness.
Blindness DOES give "woodies" to MANY sore-in-the-cunt cuntsorevaturds, doesn't shit?
NONE are so blind ass those who willfully REFUSE to see!
What offense did he reasonably believe she was about to commit? Seems like he didn't even have any basis to demand she identify herself.
She also wasn't "abroad in a public place" per the portion of the statute that was referenced. And he certainly didn't need her "address" either, since he was at her house.
the cop could say he believed she was SWATTING her neighbor
Calling in a noise complaint would not be swatting, as they don't typically send the swat team in for noise complaints.
Wow, it's worse than that: It's not even a 'stop and identify' - here's the whole text of the statute:
Section 15-5-30
Authority of peace officer to stop and question.
"A sheriff or other officer acting as sheriff, his deputy or any constable, acting within their respective counties, any marshal, deputy marshal or policeman of any incorporated city or town within the limits of the county or any highway patrolman or state trooper may stop any person abroad in a public place whom he reasonably suspects is committing, has committed or is about to commit a felony or other public offense and may demand of him his name, address and an explanation of his actions."
https://law.justia.com/codes/alabama/title-15/chapter-5/article-2/section-15-5-30/
That's it, they actually quoted most of the law in the article. He doesn't have any authority to do this in her home (and probably the curtilage, if not her entire property), and he doesn't have any authority to see her ID, just 'ask her name'.
You can't have a police state without police.
WTH does the word "abroad" mean in this context?
They're going to change to the law to saw "abroad, adude, or adudette, or any other agender the subject identifies as".
Was there ever a time when police faced consequences for arresting people on charges that they knew would be dropped? Or has the process always been the punishment for the crime of POP?
But if you return stolen documents, all is well!
The bad guys were taken off the streets, and the good guys went home to their families.
Get with the program.
Hate to break it to you all, but this is the sort of crap that *must* become commonplace if the right-wing fantasy of "deport all the illegals" ever were put into practice. After all, how else is the state supposed to know who is an illegal and who is not?
Skin color!
Not speaking English?
But the real point is keeping them out in the first place, not giving them welfare, and actually deporting them when they commit a minor crime or after they've served their sentence or a serious crime.
Not speaking English?
lol, no profiling there
If they're crossing the border at some place other than a port of entry?
Don't be a DNC apologist.
What about all the illegals who are already in the country? How are you going to tell who is an illegal and who is a citizen?
I guess we shouldn’t have a border or immigration policy then.
Here is a better idea. Instead of trying to deport 11 million illegals, which is going to violate all of our rights because it necessarily means creating an Alabama-style "Papieren Bitte" regime, instead give them work permits and the legal ability to stay in this country.
It is Alabama.
Which is a free state compared to NY.
And Reason is turning a blind eye to the violent, bigoted, hatefull, antisemetic, pro-war, and anti-capitalist Hamas soldiers destroying private property and trespassing on the formerly prestigious college campuses.
1930s Germany got it's anti-semetic start on college campuses in Germany.... then came the gas chambers.
The Hamas activists (democrats) will go for the black people once they finish exterminating the Jewish people.
NY is not a stop and ID state.
“…stop any person abroad in a public place whom he…”
The even more obvious problem with this cops actions? She wasn’t abroad in a public place.
Fuck the justice system.
It's not entirely clear how Barton ended up at Stallworth's home on February 23.
Well, I mean, you could try googling it. Oh wait what's this: She then went out to her car and purposely turned on the alarm to draw her neighbor's attention.
Seriously though, who does that in a civilized society. This chick is the whitest (and trashiest) of white trash. "You gon' annoy me? I gon' annoy you mo! Mah name is KA-REN."
No really, she did that:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alabama-police-officer-was-disciplined-arrested-woman-refusing-show-id-rcna142834
I'd criticize Emma for not doing the basic legwork to find that out, but we all know that Emma isn't a journalist. She's a JoUrNaLisT lmao.
The only problem? Barton had no legal basis to demand Stallworth fork over her I.D.
And yet, once again Armchair Lawdog Emma Dumb Dumb completely fails to understand the situation. She wasn't arrested for failing to fork over ID. She was arrested for failing to ... wait for it ... "provide their name, address, and an explanation of their actions".
Now, the one-sided video heavily slants this fact. But WATCH the video (Emma clearly didn't). Based solely upon that, do you know her name? Her address? Her actions?
Nope.
I'd actually be real interested to see the bodycam footage of whether that ever happened. But, nobody - least of all "JoUrNaLiSt" Emma - seems interested. She done got all the narrative chum she needed right out the gate.
On March 8, Mayor of Andalusia Earl Johnson issued a formal apology to Stallworth
That means jack squat and has no bearing whatsoever on determining the right or wrongness of 5-0's actions. He's politicking.
But, I get it. Advances the narrative. Because "JoUrNaLiSm" lol.
So why not write her a ticket/arrest her for disrupting the peace, which is an actual crime, versus failing to identify (which she wasn't even charged with)?
No idea. I wasn't there. And we only have a one-sided telling of the story.
The law does not empower them to demand she identify herself in her own home. Someone quotes the whole text above.
It does if she's suspected of a crime. Which she clearly was.
"any person abroad in a public place"?
No, not that.
Johnson noted that Barton "has been disciplined for failing in his duty to know the law."
--------------
Now *this* is where I'd like to see a 3 strikes law implemented. 3rd strike and you're out; go find another job.