Challengers Is the Horny Tennis Movie Hollywood Needs
A witty, erotically charged three-way love story about tennis, sex, and ambition.

For the last decade or two, Hollywood, like the rest of America, has been marked by a sex recession. Depictions of lovemaking, not long ago a fixture of big-screen productions, all but went away. Nudity practically disappeared, especially in big-budget productions. The number of studio-produced romantic comedies dwindled. Children's films dropped lovestruck princess plots that resolved in weddings for journeys of empowerment and therapeutic self-discovery.
There were myriad reasons for the shift: Some of it was a product of #MeToo, and a growing sense that on-screen sex and nudity were both unnecessary and exploitative. Some of it resulted from the rise of superhero movies and the decline in films targeting adult moviegoers. Ironically, the shift occurred in concurrence with changes in physical appearance, especially among male leads, who bulked up and got shredded for larger-than-life superhero roles. The result was a curious on-screen world in which, as one writer put it, "everyone is beautiful and no one is horny."
So it is somewhat jolting to see a movie in which everyone is beautiful and also very, very horny. Indeed, sexual desire, and the way it infuses so many aspects of one's life, is the subject of Challengers. It's a delirious, delightful, love-triangle romp—not only the horniest tennis movie you'll ever see, but the horny tennis movie Hollywood needs.
Directed by Luca Guadagnino from a screenplay by Justin Kuritzkes, Challengers tells the story of three ambitious tennis players who love and lust for each other. There's Mike Faist as Art Donaldson, the studious nice guy of the group. There's Josh O'Connor as Patrick Zweig, the charming-but-erratic striver who can't quite get his act together. And connecting the two, there's Tashi Duncan, played by Zendaya, a should-have-been superstar who switched to coaching after an injury derailed her tennis career.
Kuritzkes' script flitters back and forth in time, taking viewers from the moment the trio first meets at a juniors tournament to the peak of their careers, showing the trio coming together and coming apart. The nonlinear narrative, which spans a decade or so, captures the ebb and flow of desire and the ways it can turn into an obsession over time.
Zendaya's Duncan is the pendulum that swings between the two male leads, but it's clear they're competing for more than just her attention. A crucial scene, early in the movie, depicts the trio perched on a hotel bed in a three-way kiss shortly after they first meet: As it lingers, Duncan leans back, watching with satisfaction as the two men continue the kiss without her. For her, the pleasure is in both attention and power, and even more specifically in converting the former into the latter.
Part of what makes Challengers so invigorating is that it understands the complexities of adult desire, the interplay between attraction to another and how that person reflects on the self. It's a movie about how lust and love and heartbreak are all tied up with ambition and self-perception, and the ways those change over time: In college, Duncan falls for Patrick because of his edge, his rakish charm. But after her injury, she marries Art for his stability, his calm competence, his compliant willingness to be guided and molded by her. With Duncan as wife and coach, Art becomes a top-ranked tennis player; his career is the life she couldn't have.
In every scene, every interaction, every serve, and every line of dialogue, you see the connection between sport, ambition, sex, power, and self-definition. The three young leads bring deep vulnerability to their performances. But rather than softness or tenderness, that vulnerability takes the form of burning, high-stakes desire. Guadagnino makes Challengers a movie about wanting, in every aspect of life. Tennis, for this trio, is a game and a career, but it is also a love language, an intimate, intense, highly physical exchange between two people seeking total understanding of themselves and each other.
Did you ever think that tennis is a lot like sex? might seem like a thin conceptual reed on which to hang a movie, but Kuritzkes' screenplay keeps finding new ways to explore the power dynamics of the game, and meta-game of lust and ambition around it. Guadagnino, meanwhile, directs with such verve that it never settles into blandness; at times he captures tennis matches from underneath the court, or with POV shots of tennis balls flying between rackets. A pulsing, witty score from Nine Inch Nails' Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross—their best film work since the score for The Social Network—keeps energy levels high. Reznor and Ross' playful, EDM-influenced soundtrack underscores the movie's metaphorical conceit, that tennis and sex and desire are a sensual dance of domination and submission.
Challengers is not a gratuitous film in terms of nudity or explicit sexuality. But its heat levels are off the charts. There is an unapologetic sense of erotic intensity, a libidinous spark rooted in star power and silver screen glamour, that has recently been too absent from the big screen. Challengers will not, on its own, end Hollywood's sex recession. But as an indicator, this one goes a long way toward bringing sexy back.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Nobody needs a movie about tennis, Peter.
This article feels like it was written to fill a quota. Fortunately, that seems pretty apt for the movie.
"This is the horny, sexy tennis movie everyone needs. Hollywood has suffered a dearth of nudity in recent history and this movie doesn't provide any."
I can't wait for people to stop trying to make Zendaya happen. She's not a terrible actress, but she's also not great and she doesn't have the sex appeal to make up the difference. Certainly not as bad as Lena Dunham or Kathy Griffin but even if she was naked, I wouldn't want to see the movie.
She's a frizzy haired bean pole. Don't get her appeal.
Too bad Sydney Sweeney didn't star in this one.
Yeah, she’s got great jugs and gets naked a lot.
She's decent enough looking, but way to skinny and small for a pro tennis player.
She could well be the most photogenic person on Earth though.
It's the continuation of Adapting Reason for Modern Audiences.
We need some just to balance out all the silly ice skating movies. Ugh. Where's the John McEnroe Story when you need it?
'Slap Shot' is NOT an 'ice-skating movie', I don't care what you say.
Personally, with all the “for modern audiences” I continue to be astounded that we don’t have a version of Hoosiers where Bobby Knight throws chairs and smacks and chokes several different teams of diverse or all black players.
1/3 of the state would be, “Yeah, that’s pretty much the way it happened.”, 1/3 of the state would be, “Yeah, but the players weren’t black!”, and another 1/3 of the state would be “Yeah, but he was the winningest coach in Indiana Basketball History.”
4 words
Cindy Morgan, tennis attire
Enough already with these celebrities with one name.
But! But! But! Without depictions of erotic lovemaking by Disney Princesses, and other constant 24/7 sex scenes, our children will grow up to be GAY!
That's a big enough straw man to feed the prince's horse while he climbs Rapunzel's tower.
I guess I'm old... I have NO idea who these actors are.
How can you praise this movie? Two white cis-males oppressing a POC-ish natal female? Straight sex with nary a trans/gay/fatty involved? You must be a MAGA Christo-fascist plantation owner.
Sounds like the two simps are bi curious.
In a sport known for lesbos Reason cheers for this shit
Sounds like a MISS to me.
guarantee I’m the biggest fan of threesomes here and i play tennis a ton ... dude if a male tennis coach was bedding two of his coachees there would be shit on fire everywhere. this was a bad idea put to film
The growth in the overseas market and relative decline in the domestic market is the biggest reason for the decline in nudity. The Chinese, among many others, are watching more movies and their censors don't like nudity.
You ought to see how American games journalists reacted to a skin-tight body suit in a recent video game. They make people uncomfortable with Drag Queen Story hour look like coke-sniffing porn producers.
Well, to be fair, the censors probably do like nudity. They just don't want other people watching it.
The growth in the overseas market and relative decline in the domestic market is the biggest reason for the decline in nudity. The Chinese, among many others, are watching more movies and their censors don’t like nudity.
This is between overblown and irrelevant. Nobody made a Tennis movie with Zendaya and two white guys in the lead roles to appeal to a Chinese audience, nudity or not.
There was a shift between international and domestic (and back a couple times) from the 80s to about the 00s, and China was only a fraction of it, but since then it turns out that other cultures actually have electricity and working film cameras or can buy them and prefer their own culture and can compete with the US on the international market.
There could be an argument that certain politically ideological undertones are bleaching out the distinctions between cultures or within one culture specifically without regard for market demand, but you would just be a bourgeios, Eurocentric, white-or-white-adjacent racial purist/supremacist for even thinking something like that out loud.
A crucial scene, early in the movie, depicts the trio perched on a hotel bed in a three-way kiss shortly after they first meet: As it lingers, Duncan leans back, watching with satisfaction as the two men continue the kiss without her.
This is how you know it is make-believe.
I'm sure the studio said...you have to have the guys make out..after all you can't get funded unless you have a gay scene. I'm surprised there isn't a biological woman who decides to be a man and beats both the guys who go off together and leave Zendaya by herself. I'm sure Rotten Tomatoes critics would give it a 100! And Reason would applaud.
Now have a movie about the Coe versus Ovett 1980 Olympics...that would be worth watching.
This is how we know that 'reason' really consists of leftists -- because it's always about sex for leftists. It's like you don't think you exist unless you have tab A in slot B, or some perverted variation thereof.