Could Virtual Cashiers Be the Future of the Restaurant Industry?
Having someone take your fast-food order on a virtual call may seem strange, but the benefits speak for themselves.

In an innovative move, a chain of New York City restaurants introduced virtual cashiers, who are taking customers' orders over Zoom from their homes in the Philippines. The approach has sparked heated debates, with some claiming it is a step toward a dystopian, impersonal future. But the technology might not be as bad as critics think.
Customers at Sansan Ramen and Sansan Chicken in the Long Island City neighborhood in Queens are no longer greeted by a cashier face-to-face but instead interact with one displayed on a flat-screen monitor. Although physically half a world away, the virtual cashiers handle menu inquiries and take customers' orders just like in any other restaurant.
this is insane
cashier is literally zooming into nyc from the philippines pic.twitter.com/opAyS8AYUs
— brett goldstein (@thatguybg) April 6, 2024
The initiative, launched by New York–based Happy Cashier, has been under testing since October. It currently operates in several stores in Queens, Manhattan, and Jersey City, including the dumpling joint Yaso Kitchen.
Yet since the virtual cashiers started trending on social media, the system has faced criticism. A New York Times reporter who visited a Sansan Chicken said the cashier had a spotty connection, making it hard to hear. Another reporter tried to order something off the menu at Yaso Kitchen, but the virtual cashier didn't seem to know what they were ordering. And a New York Post article seemed to care more about the system's tipping standards than the benefits of the technology.
Beyond technical glitches, the model has sparked broader economic and social concerns. Critics argue that virtual cashiers are taking away job opportunities from New Yorkers, especially amid the shrinking local fast-food work force. Meanwhile, others have come to the defense of foreign workers who are being "exploited" with a meager salary of $3 an hour—way under New York City's $16.
Despite these concerns, employing virtual cashiers could have several advantages. For struggling businesses, it offers a way to reduce operational costs and maintain lower consumer prices.
Chi Zhang, the founder of Happy Cashier and a former restaurant owner himself, sees the model as a necessary adaptation. Facing high rents and operational costs, having "a virtual-assistant model, somewhat akin to that employed by overseas call centers, could help maximize small retail spaces and improve store efficiency," he told The New York Times.
"I simply cannot avoid discussing this topic," he told Fortune, referring to using outsourced labor to cut down costs. "The cost is admittedly cheaper than the U.S."
While the operational costs of virtual cashiers are lower for restaurant owners, the wages are also competitive by Philippine standards. According to Zhang, his virtual cashiers are earning over 150 percent more than the average cashier earns back home. It's a win-win situation.
The concept of virtual cashiers is not entirely new. Back in 2022, the Canadian food chain Freshii hired almost 100 workers from places like Nicaragua to take orders and payments through a video calling device after the company was left grappling with staffing shortages caused by the pandemic.
With the technology still in its pilot stage, improvements are expected. Zhang hopes to quickly scale up the number of virtual assistants by the end of the year, positioning his venture as the leader of a transformative trend in the restaurant industry.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Very clever idea, but the unmanned tablet is the future.
This may have a future in Applebees tier restaurants.
You mean like Chili's? Because they already have an unmanned tablet option.
I hate that thing. Constantly flashing ads during your meal, too.
Some people must like it, and it will be good for them. Chilis must have had it for 8 or 9 years now, as I remember them when they first appeared, and it's been nearly that much time since I've been to that restaurant.
I dislike electronics at meal time and don't want to be forced to interact with a tablet. If I have to do my own ordering and checkout, I guess it's a lot cheaper because I won't be expected to tip, but that's not why I go to a restaurant.
Fast food is different than sit down. Might as well kiosk it if I'm not using cash.
So what's the point of even having restaurants? Why not go back to say, automats, where you put in coins and get your pre-cooked, microwaved food (like Applebees).
Or vending machines.
Seems somewhat likely. Especially considering the other patrons.
What are these "coins" of which you speak?
Must save all those college students and single moms from being exploited by a job with a flexible schedule and cash in hand at the end of the day.
Not to mention all the guys hitting on them.
It’s all a conspiracy of the strip clubs and onlyfans to funnel those hapless ladies into their part of the service industry.
Of course, four more years of bidenomics and no one can afford food anyway, so this is a self correcting issue.
They’ll be able to afford bugs.
This is what a high minimum wage buys you.
Yeah, this bit stood out:
taking customers' orders over Zoom from their homes in the Philippines.
So, basically just an end run around minimum wage laws here in the United States.
It's not even a question that places like California are 'helping' fast food joints see the writing on the wall for the future of their business model.
And yeah, fast food isn't great for you but everyone is well aware of that and continues to do it anyway. If you're the kind of person who says 'well good, people shouldn't eat it anyway' then you are the actual problem here.
So, basically just an end run around minimum wage laws here in the United States.
Minimum Wage + Learning from COVID Lockdowns = The Law of Unintended Consequences
I think it's hilarious.
"... fast food isn’t great for you but everyone is well aware of that ..."
Pure nonsense! Food is food. You can eat too much food and gain weight, which isn't good for some people. You can eat the wrong balance of proteins, fats, starches and sugars which may not be good for some people. There is absolutely NO evidence that "fast food" is even a thing, let alone that it might be bad for you. How many times do we need to debunk control-freak narratives before they finally die?
Outstanding! I firmly believe that progress for the past several decades has been mostly due to the ability of technology to outsmart the regulators.
Although this may be true, it's not necessarily a recommendation in favor of regulators. Even people who should know better frequently forget to include the opportunity costs in their cost-benefit analyses. What other innovations were not pursued because of the diversion of talent and resources into developing innovations stimulated by having to subvert the regulators? Home schooling technology was advanced during COVID-19 lockdowns and the world may eventually be a better place as a result of subverting public tax-funded school systems, but I certainly would not recommend lockdowns because of it!
Although this may be true, it’s not necessarily a recommendation in favor of regulators.
No, it is a recommendation AGAINST regulations.
Happy Cashier gives me Happy Ending, yes? Robotically or robo-twatically?
Tim's virtual Magical Flute. That's your future.
I will be re-incarnated ass an Electric Eye!
https://genius.com/Judas-priest-electric-eye-lyrics
Up here in space
I'm looking down on you
My lasers trace
Everything you do
You think you've private lives, think nothing of the kind
There is no true escape, I'm watching all the time
[Pre-Chorus]
I'm made of metal
My circuits gleam
I am perpetual
I keep the country clean
[Chorus]
I’m elected electric spy
I’m protected electric eye
[Verse 2]
Always in focus
You can’t feel my stare
I zoom into you
But you don’t know I’m there
I take a pride in probing all your secret moves
My tearless retina takes pictures that can prove
See Judas Priest Live
Get tickets as low as $24
You might also like
The Hellion
Judas Priest
Master of Puppets
Metallica
Painkiller
Judas Priest
[Pre-Chorus]
I'm made of metal
My circuits gleam
I am perpetual
I keep the country clean
[Chorus]
I’m elected electric spy
I’m protected electric eye
[Guitar Solo: Glenn Tipton]
[Bridge]
Electric eye
In the sky
Feel my stare
Always there
There’s nothing you can do about it
Develop and expose
I feed upon your every thought
And so my power grows
[Pre-Chorus]
I’m made of metal
My circuits gleam
I am perpetual
I keep the country clean
[Chorus]
I’m elected electric spy
I’m protected electric eye
[Outro]
I'm elected electric spy
I'm elected
Protected
Detective
Electric eye
I just don't go back to places that have poor service.
One restaurant I liked before the lockdowns went broke, and the place that took it over got good reviews, so I tried it. The food was good, but you ordered as you walked in at a kiosk and prepaid, and a robot brought your food out later. But the kiosk still prompted you to pay an 18, 20, or 22% tip.....
hah, I responded up thread and thought the same.
I'm not paying a tip if I have to do the work. And the high tip amounts on the prompt at some places anger me.
Went to a brewpub a while back. Nearly empty, they sat me in the worst table in the place, never refilled my tiny $4 glass of iced tea, and I had to flag down the waiter twice to get my bill. They had one of the portable card machines and it prompted for 18%, 22% or 25% tip, and didn't have an obvious way to enter your own tip or get past the screen.
I found a way out of the screen, won't go back, and tell all my friends "fuck that place." Sandwich was good, but the entitlement and shit service mean I'll go to one of the other dozen brewpubs within 10 minutes drive of the place next time.
Worst part? I almost felt bad for stiffing the waiter when I figured out how to cancel out of the tip screen. Almost. I got over it.
Give them a few sheet metal screws and washers for a tip.
I just don’t go back to places that have poor service.
If the food is good then why not leave a shitty tip and come back another day?
A nice thing about reliance on tips is that lousy servers don’t make much money and and up quitting. And it’s those people who agitate for the government to force employers to pay servers higher wages.
Blinded by their good intentions the lawmakers never even consider that the result could be no servers at all, and we end up with touch screens on all the tables.
>Having someone take your fast-food order on a virtual call may seem strange, but the benefits speak for themselves.
Uhm, no - the 'future' will be an AI that takes your order. And an AI that makes your food. At no point will you be able to interact with a human in order to fix a problem either.
Also, in the interim before AI does this you'll get your order taken by a Bangladeshi man that barely speaks English using a Zoom filter to look like a cat.
I’ve tried the big tablet style ordering systems in several fast food restaurants, and find them completely non-intuitive. You have to go through seven or eight screens to order anything, especially if you don’t have their app.
since I'm bitching everywhere here...
I'm not downloading a separate app for every damned restaurant. Now they want to put their spyware on my phone AND have me do the ordering work.
I'm not their demographic. Been a year since I've been to any fast food, but my last McD's experience was that convoluted kiosk system. It was bad, but at least I didn't have to provide my own hardware and give up personal information to get a burger.
And this is where New York City restaurant workers learn that the Actual Minimum Wage is zero.
CB
So the issues with service are basically the same as you might have with a human cashier? I'd liken the intermittent connection to someone who can't decide if the phone is more important than the person standing in front of them, so this is a wash.
It solves some problems fairly neatly. If you don't own the building, especially in a place like New York, owning a restaurant tends to be a short term arrangement because you are actively working to make your rent unaffordable - the more popular your location, the less likely you'll be able to afford your next lease because you made the location so popular. In that situation, investing in your employees is taking a long term view to a short term problem.
For places like McDonald's, it might make them actually viable businesses. If your workers require government assistance to make ends meet, society is subsidizing your business and it isn't viable. In the absence of government assistance, your customers will be served by homeless people and is likely not viable.
Ultimately, people who don't like remote cashiers or cashier-less restaurants are going to have to pay more for personal service. Nothing wrong with that.
They ARE human cashiers. They just are not physically located in the restaurant.
Unreasonable wage demands have consequences.
Like many new technologies, this will have a positive & a negative side. It is certainly beneficial to small restaurants running on slim margins. What is more probable is that large chains will adopt it en masse, enabling them to lower prices further & drive more small restaurants out of business.
The unfortunate trend in modern business is to conglomerate more small businesses under the umbrella of large businesses. The tendency towards more monopolistic & oligopolistic business practices has become much stronger in recent years. Even in the industries where there are numerous small businesses, s.a. the restaurant business, the small businesses are highly dependent on a very few regional suppliers for their products.
This leaves me with the question; once they finally replace all (or most) of us with robots, who will be left to buy the products?
In an innovative move, a chain of New York City restaurants introduced virtual cashiers, who are taking customers' orders over Zoom from their homes in the Philippines.
These are NOT virtual cashiers. Remote and virtual has distinct meanings.
To alter an old tech phrase: the market sees regulation as damage, and routes around it.