Review: It's Cloned Mammoths vs. Billionaire Hunters in This New Sci-Fi Novel
Ray Nayler's The Tusks of Extinction explores the value of nonhuman intelligence.

Ray Nayler's debut novel, The Mountain in the Sea (2022), told an inverted version of a first contact story. Instead of intelligent aliens from another world, human beings encounter evidence of another tool- and language-using species here on Earth: a variety of octopus. Nayler's future was one in which nonhuman intelligence abounded, in the form of varying levels of AI, and in which people had so thoroughly dismissed and disrespected the natural world they nearly overlooked the dawn of a newly advanced species right beneath the waves.
In Nayler's similarly themed follow-up, The Tusks of Extinction, poachers have wiped out Earth's wild elephants. Advances in cloning technology allow scientists to bring back the wooly mammoth. But the mammoths don't know how to be mammoths. So the scientists that cloned the giant creatures also resurrect a digital copy of a dead scientist and activist who, before her death, studied elephants in the wild.
As in Mountain, Tusks treats intelligence and consciousness as spectrums rather than as simple binaries, portraying a planet on which humans are not so special, and animals, extinct and reborn, serve as moral competitors. In a world where new forms of intelligence seem to be appearing every day, his books raise vital questions about what qualities give a being worth.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "The Tusks of Extinction."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0374605955/reasonmagazinea-20/ to see these books, FYI...
Book-writing seems to be a total crap-shoot. I read some successful fiction books, and find them to be totally empty-headed! Other books (writers) that I have found, write fiction that I find MUCH more interesting, and have very few reviews posted! What is at work here... "Tell the reader, that which they want to hear"? You are good, your friends and family are good, and the EVIL CORPORATIONS are to be blamed? That's one suspicion that I hold...
Here's a sample of a writer that I found interesting, who was NOT inclined to tell people that which they wanted to hear!
https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0BDD6WKT3/reasonmagazinea-20/
"In Nayler's similarly themed follow-up, The Tusks of Extinction, poachers have wiped out Earth's wild elephants."
I thought it was Trump's sons. Nayler is obviously MAGA.
Yes, Trump IS pretty wild and out-of-cuntrol!!! Can ANYONE ever tame Him and His Wild antics? Or even His Wild Thang, Spermy Daniels? Can SHE be cuntrolled, even?
I don't want to say that both these books sound incredibly stupid, but both these books sound incredibly stupid.
If you can clone mammoths you can clone elephants.
MESSAGE fiction is the worst fiction.