Poll: A Majority of Las Vegas Voters Don't Want To Pay for Athletics' New Stadium
The team's owner, John Fisher, may have overestimated Las Vegas residents' enthusiasm for a new baseball team.

Oakland Athletics owner John Fisher's effort to relocate the baseball team to Las Vegas, Nevada, had seemingly earned him promises of $600 million in public funding for a new stadium from state lawmakers that he didn't need.
But if Fisher was hoping for a fresh start in Las Vegas, he might be in for a big surprise.
A poll by Emerson College found that only 32 percent of respondents reacted favorably to their tax money going toward the construction of a new baseball stadium for the Athletics. A formidable 52 percent voted in opposition.
Fisher's campaign to negotiate an extortionate deal with Nevada lawmakers is yet another potential example of taxpayer-subsidized stadiums, an unsavory arrangement that has become so commonplace it's easy to lose count.
The result of this poll, however, is a reminder that not everyone is on board with this corporate welfare. Just last week, taxpayers in Kansas City rejected a sales tax for renovations on a football stadium and the construction of a new baseball stadium, despite those teams' owners threatening to relocate if the initiative failed.
The Athletics ownership, however, has moved past such ultimatums. The team recently relocated to Sacramento, where they will stay at least until the end of the 2027 season.
The decision to leave Oakland came after many years of tension between Fisher and the city. The key catalyst was the infamous Coliseum stadium, which had been home to the Athletics since 1968.
The outdated arena is generally considered among the worst stadiums in pro baseball and has gone through it all: sewage troubles, feral cats, dead mice in soda machines, cat feces, moth infestations, and broken seats. The list goes on.
But attempts to replace it were in vain. Fisher's demand that the public fork over $855 million for infrastructure and development around a new ballpark—Fisher is worth $3.1 billion, by the way—was one of several reasons why he had a falling out with the city.
Many fans have also blamed Fisher's incompetence for the team's failures, and they've made that clear in numbers: Since 2022, the Athletics have recorded the lowest average attendance among all the Major League Baseball teams, with just 10,275 per game in 2023.
Fisher doesn't have support from all of his players either. Trevor May, a former reliever who retired as an A's player, went on a tear against Fisher during his retirement announcement, calling him a "greedy fuck."
The owner's pursuit of public funds is yet another attempt to make taxpayers bolster a private business and perhaps compensate for his mismanagement. Fisher now wants to take those problems to Las Vegas. The poll by Emerson College suggests that voters are not buying it.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Fuck you, cut spending.
Poll: A majority of Reason commenters don't want to fund the war in Ukraine. Or Gaza. Or anywhere else.
But cutting military spending is such a 3rd rail in politics because it gets whistleblowers offed like they are bit actors in Homeland. Or the Clinton Cabinet. Whatever.
sewage troubles, feral cats, dead mice in soda machines, cat feces, moth infestations, and broken seats. The list goes on.
I'm sure it does. But not one of the things on that list, or all of those things on that list, requires a new stadium. Train the feral cats to eat the mice before they die in the soda machines, then leave their crap at the front door for garbage pickup. Did this asshat Gap heiress not see Moneyball?
The Los Angeles Dodgers owners not only paid for their own stadium, they even pay property taxes on it to this day.
Fisher is rich; he can do the same.
Unfortunately, neither Democrats nor Republicans oppose welfare for billionaires. 🙁
It doesn't matter if 99 percent of Las Vegans are in favor of it. Spending taxes extracted by the force of law for the benefit of specific private persons or businesses is just, plain, wrong.
Small business doesn't get the same considerations, despite every person and politician saying how important small business is. How it is the backbone of the economy. Humans are a clown show.
"Trevor May, a former reliever who retired as an A's player, went on a tear against Fisher during his retirement announcement, calling him a "greedy fuck."
That describes every billinaire and most humans
I'm not sure a 0.02% poll is a representative sample to base an entire article on. Unless, of course, you're grinding your "no taxes for stadiums" axe. Which Reason loves to do.
Have you seen how the Golden Knights have absolutely transformed Vegas culture? From their Cinderella debut season to winning the Stanley Cup - the Knights absolutely turned Vegas into a sports town and destination.
Have you taken in a football game while in Vegas yet? For some reason beyond explanation - they love having the Raiders there. The Raiders - of all teams - whose only notable aspect prior to Vegas is having psychotic fans that flip and burn cars when they lose. But since leaving Oakland (or, perhaps more accurately, leaving the people of Oakland), suddenly the Raiders are kinda respectable again. (Funny what happens when you move out of California.)
It's why I question the sample. Vegas is a tourist destination. Having another tourist feature that comes pre-loaded with a loyal following of baseball fans, and seeing how Vegas itself absolutely embraced their sports teams - I'm kinda thinking it's not an accurate representation of Vegas' thoughts on the subject.
Fuck the Golden Knights.
Well, I mean, we all have our teams. I'm just saying that the GK's have really transformed Vegas into an entirely different city. Been there lately? It's Knight Life everywhere you look.
I live in Las Vegas. I like the sports teams. I don't like being forced to pay for their stadiums.
The popularity of a team does not automatically translate to willingness to involuntarily subsidize it.
Admittedly, I'm unfamiliar with how Las Vegas translates tourist dollars into local spending on behalf of Vegas and its residents. I do know that "The Strip" is a different entity from "Las Vegas," and I also know that "Las Vegas" is kinda broken up into a couple distinct areas which all kind of generally bear the moniker. But are you telling me that a subsidized stadium brings nothing in return for the city/people of Las Vegas? Or that you don't think whatever it brings is worth whatever tax burden you incur to help pay for it?
No one gets to criticize a sports team owner for being "greedy" in a world where Jerry Jones exists.
"The team's owner, John Fisher, may have overestimated Las Vegas residents' enthusiasm for a new baseball team."
In fairness, he may just have overestimated Las Vegas residents enthusiasm for his below the bottom of the barrel team. If it was an actual good team, it's just distantly possible that there might be more enthusiasm.
Not that spending public money on a good team would be justified in any case...
If the projected economic benefit to the surrounding taxpayers outweigh the cost of the stadium then it's a good deal. If not then it should not be done.
If the initiative needs to pass, then the benefits to the taxpayers will need to be laid out and explained.
Since there is no professional sport that provides a benefit, the taxpayers will clearly see the the new stadium isn't worth paying extra for.