E.U. Regulations Created a Port Wine Black Market
Over 1,500 types of wine are protected by European Union regulations.

People have been making wine in the verdant hills of northern Portugal's Douro Valley for nearly 2,000 years. Nowadays, the region is home to more than 19,000 grape farmers and 1,000 companies tending terraced vineyards that tower above the Douro River below.
Hundreds of these vineyards are small, often family-owned, properties called quintas, many of which produce port: a syrupy, sweet fortified wine. As a European Union–protected designation of origin product (similar to French Champagne or Italian Parmigiano-Reggiano), the production, labeling, and sale of port are heavily regulated—sometimes to the detriment of the small-scale operators keeping the cultural practice alive.
When I visited the Douro Valley this fall, one quinta owner shared that she couldn't officially sell port because of burdensome government regulations. All port sellers are required to keep at least 75,000 liters in reserve at all times, she explained—a standard that large producers can meet, but one that might bankrupt a small quinta like hers. In effect, she could only participate in this important cultural heritage as a black market seller.
Francisco Montenegro, owner of the Douro Valley–based Aneto Wines, notes that would-be port sellers have to grapple with several regulations that make it difficult for them to enter the market. On top of the 75,000-liter stock minimum, port producers are allowed to sell or market only one-third of their output, "thus forcing the producer to let [two-thirds] of their wines age." They have to register under a specific tax status "as they work with spirits," which requires them to "pay more customs taxes." Government regulations also mandate that producers "wait at least 3 or 4 years if they want to bottle a normal tawny" port, Montenegro says.
A vast regulatory regime dictates the kinds of grapes producers may use, the number of grapes they may harvest in a year, and when they may bottle and sell so-called vintage ports. These regulations largely come from the Instituto dos Vinhos do Douro e do Porto (IVDP), or Port and Douro Wines Institute. The IVDP says it is a government body that "upholds the quality and quantity" of port and Douro Valley wines through "binding specifications."
"We must take into account that not all countries in the world recognize or protect appellations of origin as an intellectual property right," according to the IVDP.
A 2016 Cato Institute report by policy analyst K. William Watson cast doubt on the argument that these regulations protect intellectual property belonging to traditional producers. At their core, patents and copyrights provide "monopoly privileges.…to ensure that people have adequate incentive to invent new technologies or create art," it explained. But geographical indication protection "does just the opposite" by rewarding companies that "maintain old ways of doing things by making it more difficult for innovative competitors to communicate product qualities to consumers."
A Champagne enthusiast might not care that a product comes specifically from the Champagne region of France and meets all the regulations the name demands, and that person wouldn't be harmed or deceived by a product branded as "Portuguese Champagne." He is harmed by this barrier to entry into the marketplace, which limits his options as a consumer.
The E.U.'s "aggressive approach" to geographical indications serves "as a way to monopolize certain markets of commonly produced food categories, confiscating generic terms like parmesan and feta, even though such terms entered into generic usage generations ago," Shawna Morris, former vice president for trade policy at the U.S. Dairy Export Council, told the Associated Press in 2018.
"For centuries, Douro has always meant Port," wine writer John Sumners reported for VinePair last year. But this may be changing in favor of less-regulated products: "Dry table wines offer far more market exposure" and "require less tied-up capital," explained Sumners. According to one wine expert interviewed by VinePair, port sales have declined by around 30 percent in the past two decades.
There are many reasons for that decline, but a regulatory regime that keeps new entrants out of the market can't help. These restrictions don't just serve to keep malicious foreign counterfeiters from flooding the market with low-quality port. They can stymie the efforts of innovative producers and traditional, small-scale operators alike—people with a passion for culturally important products who simply can't afford to take on a massive regulatory burden.
Europe's Protected Booze
As of February 2023, the European Union listed 3,500 food and drink products on its three geographical indication registries, which regulate the naming, packaging, and sale of certain culturally important products. Of those 3,500, 46.6 percent are wines, 46 percent are agricultural products and foods, and 7.4 percent are spirit drinks, according to the European Commission's Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development.

This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Portugal: How Much for a Glass of Port?."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So then, which tastes better, anyway? Port, or starboard?
And PLEASE don’t tell me that THIS, too, now has become a mark of Tribal Virtue!!! To wit, twat, all True Rightists now drink starboard and all True Leftists drink port? DAMN it all; WHEN will all of the hyper-tribalism just STOP?
I don't know? When, Mr. Blue Tribe's medicine man?
Probably never, unless we genetically re-engineer our behavior-influencing genes, and-or hybridize our very brains with computers, to a significant degree... YOU should volunteer FIRST, Perfect Tribal-Shit!
Only sinister squirrels pass port to starboard
Rules to remember when two vessels meet
When two power vessels are approaching head on, both vessels should alter course to starboard to pass port-side to port-side. When two power-driven vessels are in crossing situation on a collision course, give way to the vessel to starboard (right).
Wooo-Hooo, I learned something new today! Old SQRLS can actually learn new tricks! (TURN new tricks, not so much so!)
What if one or both vessels are not "power driven"?
Makes the first post about tribal politics. Complains about tribal politics.
Biggest asshole AND biggest asshat in town, is also at least ONE of the worst tribalists in town... SAYS repeatedly that shit has muted me, butt reads my stuff anyway, and bitches about it!
Makes the first post about EVIL Demon-Craps! Bitches about Demon-Craps! Twat's the difference, dog-piling bitch? Besides WHICH tribe ye bark, howl, and bitch about, Bitch?
Small businesses are as great an affront to left authoritarians as religion.
Isn’t the black market an important cultural heritage itself?
So is despotism.
And canibalism
Haiti hater!
The Irish don't make whisky they make the water of life aka uisce beatha.
So…labeling laws. Call it a fortified wine and be done with it. Use fancy terms if you want. I don’t really care if essentially a trademarked term has specific guidelines attached to its use. It’s labeling and something approaching a concrete definition for that label. As much as I hold no love for the EU, government, or bureacratic organizations I still find it hard to be upset about ensuring something has a clear definition. When we’re talking about exports, these organizations are profiting off of branding and they will go to great lengths to protect the brand
Edit: not meant to be a response to you
"Port? No! This is 'Prot'!"
Or just call it "Starboard Wine".
The EU engineered the implosion of German riesling quality by killing off wine labels that specified exactly where grapes came from, and how ripe they were at harvest
Is that in the article? I got annoyed pretty early and skimmed the rest.
This comes across to me like the arguments over almond and soy milk being called milk. When the term is used on a product that is fundamentally different than the one consumers seek it causes problems. When standards are dropped for a highly sought product interest falls quickly.
The old classification system mapped tens of thousands of vineyards and set regional production grades from dismal- industrial wines from unripe grapes with sugar added , to sublime- hand picked grapes ripened until first frost.
It was too much quality control for the Eurocracy to think about, so they abolished label details
"I still find it hard to be upset about ensuring something has a clear definition."
Assumes without evidence that the definition is clear rather than a dozen pages of legalese.
And no, if you read the article the definition is NOT limited to it was made in this area.
I'm all about helping smaller business owners / vintners break in to the market, so it seems it would be great to pressure the EU to drop the 75,000 L standard and drop the 2/3 reserve requirement. But the author is completely wrong about labelling laws. Champagne on a label means it comes from Champagne, from certain grapes, with certain minimum quality standards, made in a certain style and aged in a certain way. If you want to don't want to play by those rules, you can still make it and sell it, but you have to call it sparkling wine. Similarly, you don't get to call some random fortified wine you made a Port. Or Parmeggiano Reggiano cheese, Prosciutto hame, Cognac, etc.
Does anyone know what the EU's rationale is for the minimum 75,000 liter stock requirement?
Fuck you, that's why.
Belgium had to destroy a shipment of Miller High Life, dumping all down the sewer. Why? Because of the slogan "The Champagne of Beers". I shit you not.
When people say we need to be more like Europe I just want to slap them. Our regulatory system used to be "Legal unless expressly prohibited". Now it is becoming more and more like Europe's: "Illegal unless expressly allowed."
What Made America Great wasn't Trump, or building walls, or any shit like that. What Made America Great was that people were free to do stuff without having to constantly ask a bureaucrat for permission. Trump has NOT gotten us back to that, he hasn't even tried.
Moral of story: Vote Anyone Younger Than Seventy Five in 2024! Don't let the old men in!
A lot, or all of the definitions were prior, and country based and the PU EU is trying for a change to respect some of those designations. If they had their way they'd call anything champagne. They certainly have screwed with other things. I think you can call it mozzarella now even if it's made with milk powder. Eww.