Greater Protections for Assange
Plus: Abortion pill case, another fatal subway crime, China's Cultural Revolution, and more...

Extradition decisions: Yesterday, Britain's High Court ruled that WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange—who stands accused of violating the Espionage Act due to his 2010 decision to publish classified documents leaked by whistleblower Chelsea Manning that revealed disturbing U.S. military actions—cannot be extradited to the United States until greater assurances are provided about how he will be treated in custody and at trial, including receiving First Amendment protections.
The court gave U.S. authorities three weeks to provide assurances that Assange "is permitted to rely on the First Amendment to the United States Constitution…that he is not prejudiced at trial (including sentence) by reason of his nationality, that he is afforded the same First Amendment protections as a United States citizen and that the death penalty is not imposed."
This decision had been anxiously awaited by Assange-watchers, given that he is very close to the end of the road, in terms of appeals, within the British court system.
The U.S. has until May 20 to provide these assurances to the British High Court; if they are not satisfactory, he will receive a full appeal hearing in the U.K. Concurrently, Assange's legal team is seeking an appeal with the European Court of Human Rights, which could possibly delay extradition further.
In other words, his fate remains uncertain, but this move by the British court is a decidedly good one. For more on Assange's case, watch this episode of my show, Just Asking Questions, in which Zach Weissmueller and I interviewed Julian's wife, Stella (who also happens to be an attorney who has worked on his case).
Abortion pill legality being considered: Today, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case involving the legality of mifepristone, one of the drugs used to induce abortions. The decision will most likely be announced in June, later in the term, and will have significant implications for whether the pill can be prescribed by mail or telemedicine.
"At issue is whether the [Food and Drug Administration (FDA)] acted appropriately in expanding access to the drug in 2016 and again in 2021," reports The New York Times. "The court is also expected to consider whether the plaintiffs, a group of anti-abortion doctors and organizations, can show that they will suffer concrete harm if the pill remains widely available. Lawyers call this requirement standing."
The Biden administration says, via brief, that the group of doctors has brought the lawsuit "based on speculative and attenuated injuries."
Here's a timeline of mifepristone approval, access, and lawsuits, spanning all the way back to 2000. More on how the FDA has determined mifepristone's risk/safety here.
"Two-thirds (66%) of US adults say they oppose banning the use of mifepristone, or medication abortion, nationwide, and 62% oppose making it a crime for healthcare providers to mail abortion pills to patients in states where abortion is banned," per a CNN writeup relying on KFF polling data from earlier this month. All of that is to say: abortion restrictions, particularly early-term procedures (which seemingly strike many people as less grotesque, more anodyne) have not proven to be a winning political issue for Republicans, so if the Supreme Court does move to restrict mifepristone, the political ripple effects may be major.
Scenes from New York: Another subway system crime, this one involving a man being shoved onto the tracks by a stranger, struck and killed by the oncoming train, during rush hour in East Harlem. (We discussed the rise in this particular category of crime on the JAQ episode with criminal justice professor/former Baltimore cop Peter Moskos.)
QUICK HITS
- A little after 1 a.m. this morning, a cargo ship struck the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, causing the bridge to collapse. A rescue effort is underway for "upwards of seven people" who were reportedly traveling on the bridge at the time it collapsed.
- Yesterday, a New York appeals court reduced the size of Donald Trump's bond in his civil fraud case from $464 million to $175 million and gave him an extra 10 days to secure the bond and pay up.
- Joe Biden has gained on Trump in six of seven battleground states, per new polling.
- Are Chinese cybercriminals stealing voter data?
- In news that shocks literally nobody, wokeness is apparently "associated with lower mental well-being."
- Really incredible scene:
The opening scene in Netflix's #3BodyProblem is a brilliant, terrifying depiction of China's Cultural Revolution. Watch it now.
The entire series is worth watching, but this scene, moved from the middle of the original novel to the start of the English translation, provides a… pic.twitter.com/BpEjPY58Vm
— Nick Gillespie (@nickgillespie) March 25, 2024
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
A little after 1 a.m. this morning, a cargo ship struck the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, causing the bridge to collapse.
I am awaiting instructions on what to blame this on.
The video, btw, was weird. Ship power appeared to blink off a couple times before the thing turned itself right into the support.
Either very unlucky or very suspicious. There's smoke billowing the whole time, so it looks like it maintained engine power, but it looks like it really revs up before hitting it.
One would think that a ship that big in a port like that would be on autopilot to stay in the right part of the channel. Maybe it was on autopilot and it suddenly jerked it into the bridge after the power outage. From watching the video several times, it sure does look suspicious.
"Autopilot"?
I sure am no mariner, notwithstanding 3.5 years as a supply clerk on an aircraft carrier, but I really really doubt any ships rely on "autopilot" in river channels or harbors.
They may not. That was a random guess from a guy that has been passenger to boats in some tight channels.
Paging Captain Francesco Schettino...
I was a mariner for 20 years - ships do not use autopilot when entering and leaving port.
Fishermen sure don't. At Galveston there are lights we keep lined up as we approach the jetties at Port Aransas. Those alignments tell us we're in the middle of the ship channel and our small boat is not about to hit anything or run aground.
They have all hands on deck in the ship’s bridge to navigate the channel. It’s not as automated as an airplane.
On a civilian ship that would be, maybe, three people.
A harbor pilot takes control of large vessels as they make there way up the Chesapeake.
Between this and the Ever Forward, a few years back, they don’t seem to be doing well. In the Ever Forward, the pilot was distracted on their cellphone and grounded the ship.
Friend of mine drives a train. On tracks. Not allowed to have cell phone in cab. Does have provided communication for emergencies. Too much danger to allow distractions. Makes real good money
You know who else said "for-Ever" and "Forward"?
Obama?
The guy whose banner bore a strange device, "Excelsior!"
It was nowhere near the center of the channel and the engines were blowing smoke. Must have lost navigation soon after leaving the port. The crew had to be aware of the peril. Just speculating. Lot of liability here so we probably won't get any information from the ship owners anytime soon.
I'm pretty sure navigation in and out of ports is still very much a human controlled thing. Really need to understand well how the currents and tides and stuff interact.
It looks like they had an engine or electrical problem. The lights go out, then back on with a plume of black smoke from the smokestacks. Looks like they tried to reverse there, but the lights went out once again. After that, they drifted into the bridge pier.
The ship wasn't in the center of the channel, because there is two-way traffic under that bridge. They were properly in the right lane. A harbor pilot was required aboard, but as I understand it, a pilot does not steer the ship. He doesn't understand the ship's characteristics, so he tells the captain and helmsman where the ship should go, and they steer it.
They were going out of the harbor at about 8 mph. That seems fast for maneuvering something so big in a harbor, but time is money - I'd guess thousands of dollars an hour in payroll, depreciation, and other expenses for such a ship - so they'll go as fast as practical. Nowadays I expect they've planned the whole course on computer to an accuracy of a few inches before they start, and they should be fine as long as the computer doesn't lose power or something.
If all of a ship's propellers rotate clockwise, they have a "paddle wheel effect" pushing the stern to the right a little in addition to push in addition to the push. The helmsman corrects for that by turning the rudder very slightly.
When the power blinked off, they reversed the propellers to slow down, which swung the stern left. Apparently they either forgot to steer against this, could not steer for a few seconds due to the loss of electrical power, or reversing the propeller roiled the water around the rudder so it lost effectiveness for a few seconds. With the stern going left, the bow pointed to the right - and it coasted into the bridge pier before they regained control or the ship slowed more than 1 or 2 mph.
If they'd been nearly under the bridge when the problems started, they'd have been OK because they'd be past the pier before the ship turned. If they'd been further back, they would have slowed more and might have corrected course before they reached the bridge. If they'd done nothing, most likely the ship would have kept on course and been fine. But... Did someone panic when the lights went out?
What I've read indicates that they lost steering due to a mechanical problem. Dunno if true.
There was a long vid on Zerosledge, now unfindable, that showed a brightly lit ship going under the bridge successfully, then turning off a bunch of lights later on. Camera then pans back to the pylon. The Singapore ship approaches, blinks lights and smacks the support, "power outage" blamed. But why did the earlier ship shut off so many lights? Was it parking?
Of course it's White Supremacy, the only question is finding the nearest white person or group they can target for the crime.
Trump.
Always and forever, Trump.
How long until shrike and msnbc blame this one event for any economic issues this year?
DEREGULATION DID IT!
And all those Libertarian politicians funded by The Koch Brothers!
🙂
😉
Francis Scott Key owned slaves. Therefore the name of the bridge is the root cause.
I was about to say that. Plus bridges are patriarchal constructs, and an offense to Mother Earth, or at least the whales that bump their heads.
Bridges, like guns, cause suicide. The bridge collapse saved lives.
More like prevented illegal suicides, outside the oversight of government MAID centers.
Speaking of stupid shit like this, apparently in 2021 Patrick Henry Community College changed its name because Patrick Henry is verboten now. Say hello to Patrick & Henry Community College, named after the two counties it serves, Patrick and Henry... both so named in honor of Patrick Henry.
Are you TRYING to get cancelled?
Somehow that seems very appropriate.
Wasn’t Patrick Henry anti-slavery? He was born on a plantation, but if I remember rightly he wrote against it and criticized his own state of Virginia, saying slavery had retarded its development. He had slaves but treated them like employees instead, saying that freeing them would just get them enslaved to others.
What could those morons be complaining about?
"Liberty for me, death for thee."
-Patrick Henry, circa 2020
It was one of those Virginians (I think Henry) who wrote that he knew slavery was wrong but he intended to keep relying on slave labor because he didn't want to give up his lifestyle.
That might have been Thomas Jefferson.
Crashing into the bridge was an escalation of the "kneeling for the national anthem" that was so prevalent in the NFL (and other sports) a few years ago. Francis Scott Key wrote the poem that was turned into the national anthem. So it was just a more destructive version of kneeling to protest the national anthem.
/sarcasm
Depending on what side you're on, either white supremacy or DEI.
Personally, I am on the side of gravity. Check out the Gravity Party candidate for 2024, Giant Meteor.
It is interesting that the ship hit the Key Bridge at exactly the point at which it would do the most damage and not only take much of the span down, but also put the Dundalk port out of business for quite a while.
It didn't 'hit at exactly the point at which it would do the most damage'.
It hit a support. If it didn't hit a support, well, it wouldn't have hit anything, would it? And dropping any support would have brought the whole thing down.
Stop being a conspiricist.
Yeah. It hit a 20 foot wide support which brought most of the over-water part of the 1.6 mile bridge down. Pretty accurate accident.
Bruh, yes, its going to bring the rest of the bridge down. The two spans resting on that pylon are pretty heavy and they're going to disrupt their neighbors - if it had hit the other span the same thing would have occured.
And you'd be surprised how often ships hit small targets *in the open ocean*. Its not 'hit a small target' - its 'a small object intersected with a MASSIVE one*.
Especially when you lose power (and thus steering) and drift off course.
Buddy of mine, heard it crash this morning. He didn't report hearing any "Allah Akbar" or "Lock Her Up" chants, so I think the usual suspects are off the hook.
Too early to blame it on the dawns early light
Fist got one upped.
TOO SOON
Was expecting some lines from the anthem from you.
direct assault on our national anthem
Just don’t blame it on terrorism, they’ve already done an intensive investigation and concluded it wasn’t that.
CARGO SHIPS DON'T COLLAPSE STEEL BEAMS!
Ha
Does this mean sailors will have to take their shoes off and be groped before boarding?
Those are freedom feels and all USA citizens should be happy to accept liberty's embrace.
Don't forget to cup the balls!
Hey, a fella could pay good money for that in some ports.
Considering they're celebrating new 'wind driven' cargo ships (now where have I heard of that before) maybe taking off the shoes will be so they can have better traction when tending to the lines and stays.
Buttigieg is on his way, my bet is he blames it on the racism of Francis Scott Key.
The ship sports a Singapore flag. So according to Mangu-Ward it is ipso-facto obvious that it has nothing to do with the Chinese Communist Party. Case closed. Next?
If this is indeed sabotage, my bet would be on China. Baltimore is one of the biggest ports on the East Coast and exports a lot of farm and construction equipment from the Midwest.
I am awaiting instructions on what to blame this on.
C'mon man. This is Reason! It's clearly Sen. Wesley Jones' fault for introducing the Merchant Marine Act of 1920.
Yesterday, a New York appeals court reduced the size of Donald Trump's bond in his civil fraud case from $464 million to $175 million and gave him an extra 10 days to secure the bond and pay up.
Things are coming up Trump.
Still.
Imagine having to pay $175 million just to make an appeal.
If this was Russia and Putin's leading opponent had to pay $175 million just to appeal a crooked ruling, Reason would be full of opprobrium.
Imagine having to pay 500M without any victims.
The whole scenario is shit. The left was losing their minds yesterday with MSNBC saying the courts were favoring Trump.
It has been fascinating to watch. They were all cheering along while he got railroaded by a phony court. Next, they were all pumped about how broke he was. Stage 3 was them upset because he was going to let her take his shit and that would help him win. Now, the justice system is unfair because he is getting off scott free by posting a $175M bond for a crime that had no victims or losses.
Yup. But the cunts at MSNBC all have at least stage 3 TDS, and need to wail every day.
Then he made a cool $3 billion the same day.
Looks like it's more like $5B at the current stock price.
“Stage 3 was them upset because he was going to let her take his shit and that would help him win.”
This was the talking point sarc settled on. Poor sarc.
And, again, these people are our elected leaders, our nominal betters. The people who, apparently, can't avoid walking into a "Do what I want or I'll hold my breath until I pass out." Polish Standoff.
The center-right's been puffing themselves out about how this was fraud, and are starting to realize now that if it was, the banks were complicit in it--either because they didn't do their due diligence as required, or were in on the "fraud" themselves because they figured they'd get more money on the back end through interest.
Well, great, but if that's the case, why didn't James go after the banks, too? And why hasn't she or the DoJ done what amounts to a RICO or mass suit against the industry for doing this practice for fucking literal decades?
And the answer is that everyone knows why--like the Carroll civil suit, it was designed specifically to selectively prosecute and punish Trump. No one else. And they've been such tards about it that this shit isn't even moving the needle politically anymore--Biden's been such a shit President, and the pendulum in the culture war is finally starting to swing back the other way, that Trump is in an honest-to-goodness position where the 3 am ballot dump, fake water main breaks, and fake election-day voting machine breakdowns might not be enough to overcome his margin for victory.
Everyone fucking knows this is a political persecution that doesn't have jack shit to do with the actual laws. The center-right like the Dispatch pussies are trying to pretend that these are justified, but they're just as dishonest as their leftist allies.
Well, great, but if that’s the case, why didn’t James go after the banks, too? And why hasn’t she or the DoJ done what amounts to a RICO or mass suit against the industry for doing this practice for fucking literal decades?
James has said she won't prosecute others in similar situations. It violates stare decisis to prosecute only one party when the proof is the same in both cases. The People have to be able to rely on the courts to apply the law equally in all cases.
""Well, great, but if that’s the case, why didn’t James go after the banks, too?""
I was making that point yesterday. The fine is about profits (ill-gotten gains) due to misrepresentation on the paperwork. The bank clearly made money on the deal too. Why Trumps gains are foul and the banks gains are not, is a valid question. That's something that should be raised in the appeal.
The fine cannot be about profits because it's more than the value of the buildings and these weren't 30 year minimum payment mortgages
Please to be noticing who get the loot - - - - - - - -
Not the "victims". They aren't getting a dime and they don't want it either. This was plain and simple robbery by a pair of criminals abusing the court system and egged on by a clique of fascists.
Remember, one man's criminal is another Marxist's freedom fighter.
Imagine having to pay $175 million
It’s an absurd amount of money. But if you look at it as a percentage of his net worth (excluding Truth Social) it’s the equivalent of someone worth $250,000 having to cough up around $20,000. It’s a lot, but it’s doable.
Again, I’m not defending the judgement. Just putting it into perspective.
I'm not racist, but...
I'm not sexist, but...
No offense, but...
I'm not defending [the Left], but...
Sarc, never defending the Left, but always defending the Left.
You are an embarrassment to the Corps.
You are an embarrassment to humanity.
Just here for intelligent discussions. You say so all the time. Why won't people believe you?
"I don't like your posts, therefore you're an embarrassment to the corps"
-sarc
I’ve got a few friends and several coworkers who are retired Marines (they make it very clear that they’re “retired,” not “former", hooah). They’re some of the most humble and respectful people I’ve ever met in my life. They’d be embarrassed to see that guy representing their beloved Corps.
cough cough *bullshit* cough cough
I’ve got a few friends and several coworkers …
Things that never happened.
I don't know... Let's check in on the Massachusetts Maritime Academy while we're at it.
How far the mighty have fallen.
I'll take things that never happened for $500, Alex.
Ain’t that cute. Textbook ad hominem. “You’re a liar, therefore I need not consider what you said.”
I could write a textbook about people fellating fallacies about you guys. Which is pathetic, since before The Donald was elected, such fallacious arguments were a hallmark of the left. People right of, say, Tony, could be counted on refraining from fallacies or making an effort to not use them when pointed out.
Now it’s a badge of honor. Y’all are even worse than the leftists were when O’Bummer, the black Irish Jesus, was president.
2014: “You don’t like his policies because you’re racist!”
2018: “You don’t like his policies because you’re deranged!”
You guys became what you hate. Pathetic.
Still not an ad hominem retard. Do you need the examples again?
2014: “You don’t like his policies because you’re racist!”
Weird. You do this shit all the time regarding migration. Including Saturday.
I could write a textbook about people fellating fallacies about you guys.
Going to figure out what fallacies mean first?
sarcasmic 5 hours ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
You are an embarrassment to the Corps
Wtf kind of response did you think this deserved? Fucking retard.
Always made up "friends" to justify you being an asshole. Lol.
I’ve got a few friends and several coworkers who are retired Marines (they make it very clear that they’re “retired,” not “former”, hooah).
No, you obviously don’t. OOHRAH. Not hooah, moron.
Even sand fleas are more worthy of respect than you are. You certainly don't rate to speak for any Marines.
You are an embarrassment to the Corps.
You're an embarrassment to the core.
Trumpanzees can be counted on to screech, burn Beatles albums and books, hop up and down and fling ordure every time Sarcasmic posts a clear statement. Ah! Do I spy a Moot Lewser button?
Nooooo! Not the Beatles!
I missed the burning of Beatles albums.
The difference is that someone with $250 k net worth can easily get $20k in cash without spooking the markets and crashing the value of their major holdings.
Sarc’s made it pretty clear discussing this he’s quite ignorant on the relevant topics.
More of a justification than a defense.
Again. You are defending it. Judgements are based on harm. Not based on net worth.
No you ignorant cunt. The person in your example would have $249k in home equity and $1k in cash and all other assets with maxed out credit and the fraud judgement preventing them from getting a home loan. The only way to pay would be selling the house for a cash offer and netting far less than the $249k. But you know this and are lying in your standard defense of Leftist abuses.
Its not 175million to appeal. Its 175 million to stay enforcement of the judgement while the appeal is ongoing.
He lost the case and the judgment amount is still owed until or rather unless the appeals court lowers it. And its not a fine. Its a disgorgement. Apparently had real numbers been used vs his fake numbers, the interest rates and insurance rates of the various deals would have been markedly different. Since this was an ongoing course or practice over many years; it adds up quick.
Show the math.
Again. The banks testified they did their own valuations. Are you sure you're a lawyer.
The judge valued the disgorgement as the delta in imagined loan rates as well as the total profit on the buildings. The profit includes the interest paid on the loan. Using both metrics went way above assumed loan rate deltas.
We know you aren't a mathematician, but are you sure you're a lawyer? The judge here double hit him on the claimed harm using the formula he did.
""Apparently had real numbers been used vs his fake numbers, the interest rates and insurance rates of the various deals would have been markedly different. ""
The bank probably based the interest rate on past business and that Trump is a VIP customer. This is something that could have been brought up if there was a trial.
The summary judgement was basically based on saying the paperwork was incorrect and on that alone you will not get a jury.
If a jury heard the testimony from Deutsche Bank about the loans that they gave in the penalty phase, I don't not think there would have been a guilty verdict.
In a just world, yes, I would agree. With a jury drawn from residents of New York City, I could see them voting liable regardless of the evidence or counter-evidence provided at trial.
In the Libertarian spirit of defending even the undefendable, on another Forum, I actually did this with the very Trump I despise.
When an Attorney, of all people, called Trump a traitor, I said that he may be either a Giant Douche or a Turd Sammich, but calliing him a traitor requires arresting, indicting, trying, and convicting him of all elements of Treason specified in Article Iii, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution proven before a Judge and Jury of Peers with no acceptable defense, beyond a resonable doubt.
I then pointed out that The Founders set a high bar for Treason for a good reason, since they were considered traitors to The British Crown of the biggest Empire on the face of the Earth at their time.
And then I said you may arrest, indict, try, and attempt to convict him and sentence him to death if you wish, but I’m still not voting for either Trump or Biden and no one can make me.
And since I considered myself soiled with the mere thoughts and words of Giant Douche vs. Turd Sammich, I excused myself to perform Pilates and *Ahem!* washed my hands of the whole thing.
🙂
😉
I hope all the Trumpistas are happy!
Oh, and I also pointed out this also holds true with all the accused J6 Insurrectionists, who have long since deserved their Constitutional Right to a speedy public trial.
I am nothing if not consistent.
Joe Biden has gained on Trump in six of seven battleground states...
Things are coming up Joe.
Apparenrly screaming about the death of the USC football coach is worth a few points to dems.
UCLA fans hardest hit.
They must be polling the Dominion voting machines and AI.
One poll, others just as recent show it going the other way in the swing states.
Joe Biden has gained on Trump in six of seven battleground states…
I know Ukraine and Gaza, what are the other 4? Yemen? Jordan? Are we still counting Afghanistan?
Are Chinese cybercriminals stealing voter data?
Actual voter data or the made-up stuff?
No widespread theft.
And are they doing research on voter gain of function?
...wokeness is apparently "associated with lower mental well-being."
The downside of mining victimhood for power.
Emotional angst and nihilism are not downsides. Ask any revolutionary or totalitarian.
This guy gets it. ^
According to Jordan Peterson, the #1 risk factor for wokeness is being female; #2 is low verbal intelligence.
https://podclips.com/c/low-verbal-iq-strongly-predicts-politically-correct-beliefs
The opening scene in Netflix's #3BodyProblem is a brilliant, terrifying depiction of China's Cultural Revolution.
Some will see it as a roadmap.
They already do
Oh did I get the clips mixed up? I thought I was watching a video from Evergreen College in Washington
The book was great. Chinese author. He apparently had to move the first chapter in his release in China to get past the censors there. Put near the middle.
The trilogy is one of the better ones I've read.
No the Netflix series doesn't stay true to the book. Some scenes yes. Many no where near close.
They'd never portray it to show just how insane that period became, because too many people here Europe and the FVEY nations might start seeing the similarities.
And most of those would be motivated to try harder.
Yeah. The entire BLM and now Palestine movements are mirrors of the red guard and the young pockets of the SS. It shows the irrationality of the crowds to subject others to a belief system.
The book does an amazing job with this.
In the 2nd book it catches up with the 3 red guard members who killed the professor in the opening scene and talks about how they were the first ones sent to the work camps after they were no longer useful to the revolution.
Still shocked China allowed the publication with how scathing it is against the Mao revolution.
Yeah. The entire BLM and now Palestine movements are mirrors of the red guard and the young pockets of the SS. It shows the irrationality of the crowds to subject others to a belief system.
Yeah, it's not an accident that the Cultural Revolution, the New Left and violent revolutionary period of the late 60s-early 80s, and the Current Year movement were/are all fronted by youth groups, particularly university students. These are the stupidest people who mistake their idealism and self-righteousness for wisdom, and are ridiculously easy to wind up.
The destruction of the Cult of Youth that's been active since the end of World War II is going to have to be a pre-requisite for any society to have a hope in hell of remaining functional.
Communism was ongoing during the thirties and forties. Plenty of university students took up the cause, some fanatics joined the Spanish civil war fighting for Stalin's "Republicans". In the forties many took up spying for the USSR. We had a respite in the fifties lasting to the Vietnam war.
Judging by the clip on X, not a pleasant movie.
No but an important one. And I was reading a post from a second generation Chinese woman whose grandmother had to experience watching it done to her husband, and she said it was actually worse.
IRL they did it to him for several days in a row, stopping just short of death, and the family was forced to go on stage and clean up the blood after every session. Truly one of the most evil times in human history, and people don’t realize we’re heading down the same path.
Edit: I guess she’d actually be third generation.
I was a kid when the cultural revolution was going on. I remember reading a story about it in Life magazine with page after page of big glossy photos. Mostly old men being hauled around in carts through hostile crowds. What I don't remember is any denunciation of Mao. The whole thing was portrayed as a foreign oddity. Maybe I was too young to get it but I don't remember any particular outrage in the press at the time. My Lai on the other hand...
Just look at the disparity in how it’s covered in schools compared to Nazi Germany.
The media doesn't even cover the Japanese atrocities prior to and during the war in contrast to the nazis but they sure know who to shame for Hiroshima.
The media doesn’t even cover the Japanese atrocities prior to and during the war
Really? "Empire of the Sun" immediately comes to mind. Before the History Channel became mostly reality tv they had programs chronicling the horrors of Japanese occupation of China. Yeah it doesn't get as much coverage as Germans killing white people, but it's not like it's been ignored.
It's important to remember, in context, that the violent suppression of the Tiananmen protests took place precisely because Deng remembered what happened to China, and to him personally, the last time a bunch of university students decided to get uppity.
The clip isn't the movie.
It's an origin story. To alleviate spoilers I'll not go into detail, but it was to explain a character's motivations.
I haven't seen the movie, this is from reading the book. Which was beautifully translated, BTW, the translator adding foot notes for the English reader who might not get certain bits of cultural context. The third book was Meh, second OK, first one excellent. Well worth the read, especially with the interesting twist of the Chinese viewpoint.
Yeah. 3rd one was a bit of a slog but I still enjoyed it.
And I really enjoyed the dark forest theory stuff. But the imaginary girlfriend was too sarc like minus the character being intelligent.
"No the Netflix series doesn’t stay true to the book"
After watching their cartoon/anime live adaptions, this is not shocking in the least.
or a lazy remake of the demise of ned stark from season 1 of GOT
I'm with Nick on this one. But if the thing hews close to the book, and series never do, it may be just the excuse the illiterati need to NOT read the books--nor nor listen to the unabridged audio. The real deal was recommended to me by an engineer. It is a sobering look inside the "finite pie" and "us or them" mentalities endemic to looter worldviews.
No wonder you'd be in perfect harmony with the CCP.
Another subway system crime...
The Tom Cotton Plan isn't working.
Needs more surge.
Crime is down. Quit watching the bad channels that tell you otherwise.
Yeah, crime is down. Like in the subways more than at street level.
I've been told by a myriad of talking heads and politicians that increased crime is misinformation.
"When you walk into a place like this, you take three steps down. Physically AND socially."
Ah, but not reporting does not mean non-existent. As long as an anti-"snitch" culture exists, as long as people equate reporting violent crimes with Karen calling the cops on kid's lemonade stands or adult neighbors smoking joints, crime statistics will always be approximate at best or wildly inaccurate at worst.
So, to hell with repealing any of those moronic laws?
How dare you mention Tom Cotton. Now the entire NYT news room has to take the day off for emotional counseling.
Ackshuyally, IIRC, the previous fatslity in the NYC subway was considered self-defense and no charges were filed against the shooter.
...until greater assurances are provided about how he will be treated in custody and at trial, including receiving First Amendment protections.
The Limeys think he has dirt on Hillary.
Also, the Brits blathering about free speech rights being honoured is rich.
It's not like he prayed silently or misgendered someone, those are real crimes unlike supposed espionage.
One hundred percent, but despite the hypocrisy I'm glad they're doing it, because the centipedes in the IC really do want to Guantanamo Bay his ass.
No I don't think Assange should be in jail. But this isn't a 1st amendment issue. He isnt indicted for publishing. He is indicted for providing tools and instructions to get the materials off the system.
Do you think publishing cnc code to turn a block of aluminum into a receiver is free speech?
Thats not what he did. He was working directly with the person to get information off. They didn't just go to his blog.
I guess the distinction is;
"you could break the law by doing X"
vs
"please break the law for me by doing X"
So, mind control?
More akin to a mob boss telling his crew how to rob trucks and asking them to.
There wouldn’t be reprisals from Assange if they didn’t do it.
If he wasn't an active participant in the execution he'd be fully covered under precedent.
I was tickled that the British officials even know how to spell "free speech".
^+1, FoE.
Nobody needs more than 3 types of body.
I always thought the three-body problem was whether you dig one big hole, or three smaller ones.
I've heard of Body Type A and Body Type B, but what's the third type of body?
"X"
Formerly known as?
Non-trinary.
There are 10 types of people in this world, those who understand trinary, those who don’t, and those who don’t get it.
Numbers look bigger in base 3.
The entire trilogy is about theoretical physics.
https://en.wikipedia.org//wiki/Three-body_problem
I wondered if it was porn.
I bet you thought The Brother Karamazov was porn.
At issue is whether the [Food and Drug Administration (FDA)] acted appropriately in expanding access to the drug in 2016 and again in 2021...
Without even bothering to trump up an EUA?
The opening scene in Netflix's #3BodyProblem is a brilliant, terrifying depiction of China's Cultural Revolution. Watch it now.
I'm on the third episode. Like the series so far. And that opening scene was as he describes.
I wonder if you’ll be able so see the comparisons to what your comrades are doing now?
Too drunk to notice.
No. He and his comrades can't tell the difference between fantasy and historical/science fiction. Marxist ideologues really have trouble distinguishing between science and magic. That is how they come up with shit like bears in trunks.
Considering the campus struggle sessions that have been caught on phones in the last 10 years, this history will repeat itself.
I’m particularly curious with sarc (guess I’m back on mute this week) because a little while back around the time when he was expressing faux outrage about trump calling commies vermin, he made the brilliant claim that all the violence done by them was done by governments and not people.
If there is one absolute fact in discussions with sarc is he has never read a history book and has no desire to do so.
Ditto logic texts (exception: wikipedia)
I went through all three books long ago and recommend them as a window onto Chicom premises. Most of China's problems stem from British moral intimidation. Like today's christianofascists, Palmerston Brits used tu quoque to convince Celestials: "If opium is so immoral, surely you must ban backyard poppies--not just OUR dumping of boatloads of trunkfuls of prepared smoking opium, right?" The Qing fell for it, were toppled, and the socialists who replaced them cold-turkey made the glut, Balkan Wars, and WWI--as glutted producers fought over shrinking markets.
More "progressive" governance from Colorado, as reported by the Denver Post:
Democrats in the Colorado Senate fought off a challenge from within their own party Monday and advanced a bill that would increase displacement protections for tenants — clearing that hurdle nearly a year after the legislative death of a similar proposal.
The bill generally would give renters of apartments and other housing a right of first refusal to renew an expiring lease. Landlords would need to have a good reason for not allowing them to renew, such as failure to pay rent or plans for substantial renovations.
The bill drew strong pushback from Republicans and some Democrats over concerns it would swing the balance too far toward tenants.
The measure faces a final vote in the Senate as early as Tuesday. It then would need agreement from its legislative backers in both chambers for changes made in the Senate before heading to Gov. Jared Polis’ desk.
Will they affirm peoples' rights to (other peoples') property? How far can the left-left wing of the Colorado senate go? What will Gov. McDreamy do?
In isolation and with those as possible reasons for denial, this isn't too bad. Now combine it with other property restrictions and I can see where this quickly becomes abusive if not a transfer of ownership but not responsibilities.
And does this almost mandatory renewal continue at the old price?
What an unnecessary bill! No landlord is going to throw out a good tenant paying market price, just for the fun of finding a new tenant who may or may not be as good. The only purpose of this bill is to force landlords to rent to bad tenants.
What an unnecessary bill! No landlord is going to throw out a good tenant paying market price, just for the fun of finding a new tenant who may or may not be as good. The only purpose of this bill is to force landlords to rent to bad tenants.
Retarded Colorado potheads unironically believe that landlords are artificially keeping rents high, and that rent controls are needed. The people they vote into office are just as retarded as they are.
A groovy apartment in a cool neighborhood with no/low rent in a human right. Also, free wifi.
This makes me think again that we should think about redrawing American jurisdictional boundaries. Our legacy states no longer accurately distinguish political and cultural populations, and thus at least distort republican governance.
Imagine Colorado divided into three new entities: Front Range, Western Slope, and Plains. Would they function better in governance?
Imagine if parcel owners on the border between states could change states -- move the border around them.
The hell with foot voting.
Even crazier idea: remove geography from representation. Let's allow Americans to define as many political entities as they like, and then declare affiliation. We can have, say 50 groups, each with two senators. And House representatives can be allocated by population.
Even more crazier: Split the nation into ideological groups that share the same land mass. But each group can then define laws that only apply in-group.
This makes me think again that we should think about redrawing American jurisdictional boundaries. Our legacy states no longer accurately distinguish political and cultural populations, and thus at least distort republican governance.
Honestly, redrawing the state lines is probably the only thing left that might extend the life of the US a bit longer. As it stands, I'll be surprised if we make it another decade.
Think if only liberals had to pay for all the spending they want. I'd be all for those taxes on them.
No, it’s an abomination of property rights and free association. I’m not familiar with Colorado’s constitution but I doubt it gives them the authority to do this.
I wish you were right. The Democrats in Colorado have exceeded those in CA and NY in some ways.
Last year the citizens voted down a referendum for revisions to property taxation and state income tax, especially rebates over the allowed maximum revenue. Polis then called a special session, which let the Democrats pass laws that essentially imposed what the people had just rejected.
And keep in mind, that "solution" was to a problem they caused in the first fucking place by convincing Colorado's idiot voters to get rid of the Gallagher Amendment, because none of them actually have the stones to try and get TABOR repealed.
"displacement protections"
?????????????
I feel so disadvantaged by only speaking English (the American kind)
The Colorado National Socialist Party loves this kind of shit.
8 states are planning to BAN the sale of gas-powered cars entirely - after Biden unveiled ambitious plans to phase them out by 2032
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/yourmoney/cars/article-13237051/ban-gas-cars-biden-evs-states.html
A more accurate headline would be "8 states are planning to BOOST the sale of gas-powered cars in neighboring states"
The 2030's power plant dearth will be interesting.
Unless they do something about the dearth of charging stations, there won’t be a big draw on power plants.
Problem with EVs is range. I can see them being practical for someone who just putters around town. But for long drives through the middle of nowhere you can’t just strap a jerry can to the bumper. And without a robust network of charging stations, the places EVs can travel will be limited. Due to that range anxiety, I think lots of people will buy gas vehicles or hybrids in neighboring states.
ML, didn't sarc claim you were on mute just yesterday?
Reduced freedom of movement is the feature, not the bug.
Forget charging stations, I'm advocating for bumper-car style power lines over every street, just like in the Super Mario Bros movie.
The trollies in San Francisco are pretty neat. Or at least they were before all the, you know, shit.
Turn the country into one big Rice A Roni commercial!
They want to depopulate rural areas and have us all move into their 15 Minute Villages.
Good thing Biden and these states recognize the constitution.
I pointed this out as well when Colorado passed that stupid law saying that 80% of its vehicle sales had to be electrict
The Biden administration is doing this mainly because the numbers have come in, and the average person doesn't want to buy these electric vehicles. They're for status chasers and shitlib suburbanites who don't have to worry about how they'll charge up their vehicle every night. So the administration and the blue cities are going to brute force everyone else into going along with it, which will also benefit them by forcing people in the hinterlands to move closer to the urban cores.
The article says that New Mexico Demoshits are trying to figure out how to implement something similar, given that Lujan-Grisham is basically Gavin Newsom's pet poodle and tries to copy whatever California does. It looks like the main thing holding them back is the fact that so many of their blue-collar and Indian Dem voters would get absolutely screwed with something like this.
They're doing something similar here in Maine. Though they're getting a lot of pushback, even from people who already own EVs, because they're shit in the winter. Battery power doesn't work well when it gets cold outside.
I'll go EV after the invention of the fission battery.
People act as if electric cars are a new thing. Know when the first EV was made? 1888. They've had over one and a quarter centuries to figure this shit out.
Then why didn’t they?
Energy density. Physics is a bitch.
Probably safer than the Li batteries. I'm waiting for homeowners' insurance with a rider excluding fire caused by an EV.
Rescue people really don't like having to deal with EVs after a crash either. Between the dangerous voltages and the likelihood of a very hard to put out fire it's not a nice thing to have to get into.
Do not remember the district/city, but one FF said in an interview that they recommended letting them burn. Seems some of the gases from the burning batteries are *nasty*.
I drove past a car fire once like fifteen or twenty years ago. The heat was crazy intense. Scary shit. And it wasn’t even an EV.
Agreed. Until you've seen one close up, you wouldn't believe how fierce a full car fire can be. I still vividly remember the one I saw as a child in 1989. We were a good distance away for safety, and it still felt like an inferno.
We already have those;)
Mr Fusion.
I have a loaner car which is EV.
The loaner given had a defective battery.
If your battery dies…doors do not open.
Great times.
Wouldn't that happen to any car with power locks?
Not like this. Doors were unlocked (my son left it a little while earlier). The latch to physically open the door --- does not work. Was told that happens in new cars.
Which makes the lack of any advanced notice of a battery issue all the more fun.
Yeah, when the battery dies in an EV, the car completely bricks out. It's why battery replacement is so fucking expensive.
New Mexico is Arizona with more Marxists, er, artists, and less money.
Yeah, people don’t realize how fucking poor that state actually is. Everyone thinks of Santa Fe when New Mexico comes up, but that’s an outlier of a city which is mainly just a colony of California and Washington DC boomer retirees, supported by native peon labor. Albuquerque’s got the Air Force base and Sandia Labs, Rio Rancho has the Intel factory, and Los Lunas has the Facebook data center, but these are relative blips on the economy. It’s really a working-class, blue collar state that would revert back to being a giant sheep ranch if it wasn’t for the federal government’s economic presence.
New Marxico?
So . . . not like Arizona at all. Arizona at least is a functioning state.
THAT is why Maine repealed its dry laws, and every dry state after went bust. To Prohibitionists this was proof godliness had to be imposed at gunpoint on the entire nation, and the 16th Amendment was the rotten egg hatched of that cracked pot. Observe that the 21st "repeal" amendment simply set the stage for a resumption of prohibition, with federal thugs enforcing the superstitious edict of State bigots.
You're actually mistaken. Prohibition actually reduced crime, as well as abuse--and contrary to your claim, there wasn't any "godliness" that was "imposed at gunpoint at the entire nation"--Prohibition didn't cause a civil war. The "superstitious edict of State bigots" did society a big favor.
Here's the source, coming from Vox of all places:
https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2019/6/5/18518005/prohibition-alcohol-public-health-crime-benefits
And another:
https://lafollette.wisc.edu/news/prohibition-may-have-extended-life-for-those-born-in-dry-counties-nov-2023/
Repent of your evil ways.
'The court gave U.S. authorities three weeks to provide assurances that Assange "is permitted to rely on the First Amendment to the United States Constitution…that he is not prejudiced at trial (including sentence) by reason of his nationality, that he is afforded the same First Amendment protections as a United States citizen and that the death penalty is not imposed."'
Sure, Assange can have the same assurance of First Amendment speech rights as all US citizens. Not sure what that is worth these days.
As long as he doesn't say Maga and cheers on chock at Jesus he can say what he wants
Promise that; but only give him the 'republican on J6' kind.
Haha, I was lying when I said those people had rights, suckers!
"At issue is whether the [Food and Drug Administration (FDA)] acted appropriately in expanding access to the drug in 2016 and again in 2021," reports The New York Times. "The court is also expected to consider whether the plaintiffs, a group of anti-abortion doctors and organizations, can show that they will suffer concrete harm if the pill remains widely available. Lawyers call this requirement standing."
Did anyone ask the clumps of cells?
And would it matter if they rebranded themselves as fetal migrants?
Or squatters
Big no to that, squatters have rights.
'Another subway system crime, this one involving a man being shoved onto the tracks by a stranger, struck and killed by the oncoming train, during rush hour in East Harlem. (We discussed the rise in this particular category of crime on the JAQ episode with criminal justice professor/former Baltimore cop Peter Moskos.)'
Shoved, or spontaneously invited to participate in an authentic ethnic folk dance?
I need to know everyone's race before I can begin to assign fault, exoneration or sympathy.
Skin color is the most important thing.
'In news that shocks literally nobody, wokeness is apparently "associated with lower mental well-being."'
Feature, not bug.
Also, a trend that we should encourage, and then offer MAID at all woke population clusters.
At this point I assumed poor mental health was a requirement for being woke, so not shocked here.
So does wokeness cause mental illness or does mental illness cause people to be woke? Chicken v egg?
Yes.
I think it attracts the mentally ill and then makes them worse.
Partially, but I also think college freshmen who aren’t mentally ill are susceptible to propaganda by faculty and older students while they’re adapting to college if they didn’t have a freedom in high school. I went to a bit of a party school, and there were a lot of people that were overprotected in high school that went nuts with partying when they got there and flunked out that were neither mentally ill or stupid.
Yeah, definitely only part of it. I don't think it accounts for all of wokeness. It's just something I have personally observed several times with people I know.
Uh-hilk, uh-hilk... (Moots Lewser)
^ Here's a mentally ill person where you can start testing your hypothesis!
I read this morning that Calgary rejected the plea of a father of a healthy 27 year old to deny her access to MAID.
State sponsored suicide is not a conspiracy theory.
"The opening scene in Netflix's #3BodyProblem is a brilliant, terrifying depiction of China's Cultural Revolution. Watch it now.
The entire series is worth watching"
It's not. I did watch that opening scene but got bored after it jumped to present day.
I did binge From on Sandra's recommendation. It was alright. The characters have the problem all characters have in sci-fi horror, their personalities and attitudes change on a dime depending on what the scene requires their personalities to be at that moment, without regard to past characterization or actions.
Character development was much stronger in the book. I had high hopes for this series and was disappointed after the first scene.
Half the characters in the show aren't even in the book.
From was breathtaking until it wasn't ... and then I didn't pay for the second season.
Uh oh, Massie supports a Reason bugaboo!
“My district has 250 miles of the Ohio River with 3 dams, city water intakes & a dozen bridges.
The Jones Act requires shipping on inland waterways to be conducted with vessels built, registered & crewed in the United States.
I support the Jones Act even if it’s “protectionist.””
https://twitter.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1772612360940769303
On inland waterways it probably makes more sense.
Yeah, I haven’t read any of the more recent articles here about it, but the ones I had in the past, I don't remember them addressing inland waterways. I just thought it was funny.
Just went back and skimmed the responses he’s getting hammered pretty good by Spike and a bunch of other prominent libertarian accounts.
'The opening scene in Netflix's #3BodyProblem is a brilliant, terrifying depiction of China's Cultural Revolution. Watch it now.
'The entire series is worth watching, but this scene, moved from the middle of the original novel to the start of the English translation, provides a rare but important depiction of a society run amok by power-mad, ideology-crazed groups hell-bent on purifying society along Marxist-Maoist lines.'
I am most of the way through Days of Rage: America's Radical Underground, the FBI, and the Forgotten Age of Revolutionary Violence, by Brian Burrough. For those who forgot the 1970s (or neglected to learn), that decade saw the rise of multiple "revolutionary" groups, motivated by Marxism and black power, who sought to motivate the American proletariat through bombings, assassinations, and other "actions". By the time the decade ended, these Mao-admirers (at least for methods and success) had committed thousands of actual violent acts. And also inspired thousands of illegal responses from the FBI, police, and other government agencies and officials. I was a bit surprised to (re)learn how much our American revolutionaries directly engaged with comrades in Cuba, USSR, Algeria, etc.
So while the revolution did not happen here, it was not for lack of zealous killers eager to destroy our society.
I am most of the way through Days of Rage: America’s Radical Underground, the FBI, and the Forgotten Age of Revolutionary Violence, by Brian Burrough.
I've recommended that book before on these boards, and I'm glad to see someone run through it. Burrough himself is a turbolib who was sympathetic to the revolutionaries, and so they ended up telling on themselves quite a bit in interviews that he did with them.
From the WSJ:
Truth Social Stock Surges on First Day of Trading
Shares of Donald Trump’s social-media company rose about 40%, making the presidential candidate’s stake worth approximately $5.5 billion.
Democrats have a new target!
Thanks to support from our old friend Mike Liarson.
Interesting we haven’t heard from buttplug or Fascist Jeffy this morning…
What will sarc do for head pats now?
Imagine having to resort to moderation4ever or Tony.
Or misconstrueman?
More from Colorado (and the Post):
Enbrel drugmaker sues over Colorado’s potential price cap, says prescription drug board is unconstitutional
Amgen’s arthritis medication is first drug ruled unaffordable by any state in the country
A drugmaker whose product could be the first subjected to a price cap in Colorado is suing to throw out the state board that deemed its medication unaffordable.
In February, the Colorado Prescription Drug Affordability Board ruled the arthritis drug Enbrel was unaffordable for patients in the state. It was the first time any state in the country made such a declaration, and set up a months-long process to determine whether the board should set a ceiling on what Colorado patients and pharmacies pay for that drug.
Enbrel costs patients and their insurers more than $46,000 per year, the board found, and it won’t have generic competition until at least 2029. Patients use it for four types of arthritis and two other conditions where the immune system attacks the body’s tissues.
The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Denver on Friday by drugmaker Amgen and two of its subsidiaries, alleges the board wasn’t only wrong to find Enbrel unaffordable, but that the Colorado law that created the panel is unconstitutional and should be overturned by the courts.
-- First in the nation! Take that, California!
BTW, Colorado might get its wish, and reduce the amount people in the state pay for Enbrel. Like to zero.
The company should reduce the output to match, and stop selling in Colorado.
>>greater assurances are provided about how he will be treated in custody and at trial
we promise to keep him in custody underwater long before trial, will that work?
Another subway system crime, this one involving a man being shoved onto the tracks by a stranger, struck and killed by the oncoming train, during rush hour in East Harlem. (We discussed the rise in this particular category of crime on the JAQ episode with criminal justice professor/former Baltimore cop Peter Moskos.)
One thing I have noticed is that there are exactly zero instances of people shoved onto the tracks at the Disneyland Railroad.
I wonder why.
Just saw mugshot of suspect. Quelle surprise!
The deranged career criminal charged with shoving a straphanger to his death at a Manhattan train station showed no remorse as he was led out of an East Harlem precinct Tuesday to face murder charges.
Carlton McPherson, 24, is accused of pushing a 54-year-old Bronx man in front of a No. 4 train shortly before 7 p.m. Monday — the latest in a long line of arrests and disturbing incidents, police said.
Before he officially came out of the precinct, he had a smirk on his face before trying to put his hoodie on.
Cops removed his hood, and during the walk to a car, he had a serious face and turned his head away from cameras.
He did not say anything or respond to any reporter questions.
Police said he shoved the victim in front of a No. 4 train as it entered the 125th Street station and was busted after he was fingered by bystanders.
The victim was struck by the train and pronounced dead shortly after police arrived.
The incident comes amid lingering concern over crime in the transit system.
An analysis by The Post this week found that felony assaults in the system have jumped by more than 50% since 2019, and now make up a larger percentage of overall transit crime.
[McPherson] was released without bail after he was arraigned on an October 31 arrest for assault, menacing, harassment and other charges in Brooklyn.
He failed to show up for court twice and a judge issued a warrant for his arrest. He was picked up and brought to court on Jan. 11, where bail was set for $2,000 — which he posted. His next court date was set for July.
“Recidivism is a real issue and the second issue we have in this city is a severe mental health illness problem that was played out at 125th Street and Lexington Avenue at the subway station,” Mayor Eric Adams said. “And he was a recidivist, several severe mental health issues, indicators of violence. When you do an analysis and a cross correlation, you will see its the same people, over and over again.”
The gun made him do it.
How does Disneyland avoid these kind of incidents?
the princesses are armed ... like Haifa
The Republican and Democrat factions wanted initiation of force and got it. So must we now also listen to their "not THAT force" whining?
>>if the Supreme Court does move to restrict mifepristone, the political ripple effects may be major
nothing mobilizes chicks like the loss of murder-power.
I remember ripple effects as a bad hangover and occasional projectile vomiting.
the kids will never understand the 80s.
Or an unwanted pregnancy.
Even the “if the Supreme Court does move to restrict mifepristone” is exceedingly ENB-sane on several levels.
First, if we were talking about pretty much any other drug, vaccine or other, SCOTUS telling a regulatory agency they have to follow their own rules isn’t a restriction, let alone some Constitutional crisis.
Second, mifepristone isn’t the only drug approved for this purpose. Adding a second layer of “You’re going to make me tell you a second time, aren’t you?” to the equation.
Third, all variants of testosterone are the exact inverse regulatory modality. That is, rather than “Follow these steps, show it’s safe and effective, and you can sell all of it you want. Your hormones, your body, your human rights after all.” they are regulated according to the “We’re going to assume that it causes everyone to go into a murderous rage before dying of a heart attack unless you can prove otherwise.”
Fourth, and this is probably just me being a pragmatic male about things even if No. 2 weren’t true, not that SCOTUS blocking it would be a good thing, but if your womanhood depends on the sole source of the one compound that allows you to intentionally abort early-term pregnancies, I’m not entirely convinced people like Dylan Mulvaney are entirely wrong to try and steal your (notion of your) gender from you.
>>if your womanhood depends ...
oh ya, all that.
>>Scenes from New York:
have you written yourself as Wolfe Pliskin yet?
I’d watch.
An eyepatch would take away from Liz' sweet duck lips.
🙂
😉
>>Yesterday, a New York appeals court reduced the size of Donald Trump's
I know, I'm juvenile ... it's why Archer is funny.
Archer is now a smattering of progressive talking points
My Archer canon has him dying in the swimming pool. Nothing after that exists.
I think they could've gotten a lot more mileage out of the Figgis Agency.
I haven't seen the last season. Jessica Walters dies and the place goes to shit?
#3BodyProblem
my experience is 3 bodies is a party not a problem what's the problem?
3 bodies is a party not a problem
Oh, it's a scene, man...
my experience is 3 bodies is a party not a problem what’s the problem?
When they're dead, they're just called hookers. #4BodyProblem
and there's the Saigon whore who bit my nose off!
>> wokeness is apparently "associated with lower mental well-being."
sociopaths gravitate towards tyranny it's their heroin.
>>Are Chinese cybercriminals stealing voter data?
why steal what Joe Manchurian will store in his UPenn office gratis?
>‘Another subway system crime, this one involving a man being shoved onto the tracks by a stranger, struck and killed by the oncoming train, during rush hour in East Harlem. (We discussed the rise in this particular category of crime on the JAQ episode with criminal justice professor/former Baltimore cop Peter Moskos.)
Isn't this something that large American cities just have to put up with as the price for all the great things about living in a large American city you get? Like, didn't Wolfe once say something about how a certain amount of mass-transit crime was just . . . normal for major cities?
Which, it isn't, when you get off the coasts, but hey.
Well, some amount of crime is always to be expected in a city. I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure Liz just quoted some SF dipshit saying stuff like that.
The looters passed a zillion moronic laws that wreck the economy. Now, SURPRISE! There's an added zillion types of manufactured moronic crime plus a rise in actual crime. Nice work, republocrats!
"We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions." - Ronald Reagan
Public transportation would be much more popular in this country if it were racially segregated again.
Looks like I have to stick with Trump after all. I really did think RFK Jr. would have been better at purging the Deep State, but his running mate is a no-go for me.
RFK Jr. Picks Radical Leftist As Running Mate
Huh. I kind of thought he might pick someone to appeal more to center-right voters.
Article says a lot of states require a candidate to have a running mate before they can apply to get on the ballot. Seems pretty fucked up when the major parties just automatically get to put their candidate on the ballot.
>>appeal more to center-right voters
he said out loud last week he's a (D)
No doubt. But I think he is well aware that he gets a lot of interest from people who wouldn't normally vote for a D or who have recently abandoned the party.
after the last four years my money is on no (R) voting for either (D) this time.
Not being an R I couldn't say, but if I do end up bothering to vote, I'm close to being a single issue voter on covid authoritarianism still. Anyone still speaking out against that shit gets a lot of credit in my book. At the very least, it's good that disaffected democrats have an option.
At least she’s cute.
I thought I might vote for RFK jr, if I vote at all. There’s always the LP candidate I guess, but it would be fun to see a third party get more than 5 % of the vote
Another swooning George Wallace hanger-on...
I know you're suffering from dementia, Hank, but comparing RFK Jr. to George Wallace is evil and shitty even for you.
Time to get the nurses in the dayroom to switch the channel to something other than CNN.