Dating Apps Are Horrible. A Colorado Bill Would Make Them Worse.
The problem is the users, not the apps.

On Hinge, the basic text prompts where users share information about themselves are an unmitigated hellscape.
"All sex is choke sex when you're being strangled by the invisible hand of capitalism," read one profile I came across. The app offers a surprisingly large number of men who like to do yoga in the nude. A different man holds up a picture of himself with a "world's smallest cock" mug and yet didn't bother to post a picture of the adorable rooster. Things aren't much better once you open a chat: I recently asked a man in his 40s what he liked about Spain and he replied simply, "Chicas."
These are relatively tame examples. Unfortunately, some people deal with dangerous and aggressive users on dating apps, and lawmakers are taking note. But however terrible online dating may be, government intervention isn't the answer: The problem is the users, not the apps.
A bill recently introduced in Colorado aims to make dating apps such as Hinge and Bumble safer for users. The first section of S.B. 24-011 would force all dating services with any users in Colorado to submit an annual report to Colorado's attorney general about misconduct reports from users in the state or about users in the state. If that isn't available, the app must report all misconduct reports from the entire United States. These reports would all become public.
While the bill leaves some of the details up to the state's attorney general, this would probably mean that when people file false reports about each other on dating apps, the reports would all become public record. The bill uses the term "information about a member," suggesting that it would require disclosure about each individual member. Scorned lovers, racists, incels, and others with hostile motives could file false reports and harm people's job and dating prospects in the future. And a report on a government website looks a lot more legitimate than someone mad on social media. These reports might even lead to law enforcement investigating innocent users.
If you file a report against an ex to get back with them, that would be filed with the attorney general and become public record. And if a racist files a false report against every person of color, that could come up when future employers research those people. I also research dates prior to going out with them less as a matter of safety than the fact that a lot of men who have asked me on a date turned out to be married. But if I was unaware of how the law required disclosure, I might be dissuaded from dating a man if I saw this come up in his search results before even clicking on the link.
Like trying Tinder before using Hinge, the prior version of the bill was somehow even worse. It would have changed Colorado law to allow a dating service user injured by another member to sue the dating service if a report was ever filed with the dating service prior to the incident. It doesn't matter if the two people didn't meet on the app, and it doesn't even matter if the misconduct report is true. The report only has to be filed before the "incident." That means that even if the user is suspended and had connected with another user before the report was filed, if they harm that user, the app would still have been liable.
A spokesman for Democratic Gov. Jared Polis said that "the Governor believes in a free and open internet and that decisions about how people interact on social media are up to the individual, not the government."
At a time when many elected officials are seeking to blame platforms for the behavior of users, Polis offers a different approach. "Whether you meet a potential date at a bar, dance club, coffee shop, or online it is important to take safety seriously," the spokesman explained. "The Governor appreciates the sponsors' willingness to make changes to the bill that removed any private right of action and will allow dating sites to continue to be available to Coloradans." Polis' office did not comment on any of my abysmal dating stories.
Dating apps are horrible because they have horrible users—like the man who brought me to a cafeteria, drank a beverage that he packed for himself without asking me if I wanted one, grilled me for 15 minutes, and ghosted. (I later learned he was 14 years older than he claimed and Hinge had repeatedly banned him. He's tried to match with me three times more since that day.)
The Colorado bill would not help keep users safe but harm their future dating and employment prospects, often without reason. This is the wrong approach.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Lady, you've swallowed too much Kool-Aid. You are part of the problem.
Gosh. Are all racists white? Are all racism victims "people of color"?
Yeah, you're as woke as the rest of them.
And then you compound this with
"Wrong approach"?!?! Is there a "right approach" to government interference with dating apps? Fuck no! Just plain butt out!
Fah! Get it through your head, lady, government is the problem.
The rule of charity suggests another meaning for her remark - the right approach would be for people (in their private capacities) to warn others away from these apps.
The fact that she mentions this "approach" business in terms of the bill argues that there is a better approach possible in the bill, when the only better approach is no bill at all.
"This is the wrong approach", she wrote. Did she thereby exclude the "approach" of NO bill at ALL? Why live your life constantly picking fights, where your "offenders" don't need, want, or deserve a fight? How's your digestion and blood pressure these days?
The sqrl is particularly concerned with your digestive state, as this pertains to its documented culinary interests. It is also very concerned with your fight-picking proclivities, as it will not put up with any emerging competition in that area.
"...as this pertains to its documented culinary interests."
Documented? Citation please, empty-headed liar, liar, air-hair on fire!
I later learned he was 14 years older than he claimed and Hinge had repeatedly banned him. He's tried to match with me three times more since that day.
Subtext: Author is a horrible enough date to be worth ghosting four times.
ITT, we learned mtrueman is a fed. Act accordingly.
Od course, only a racist finds people of color to be fully human with likes, loves and hates all their own. Not like the savior progressives that are here to protect them from the big bad world and themselves if necessary.
They're either nature's children, household brownies (the help), or spirit guides to your average AWFUL.
spirit guides
The Magic Negro stereotype.
What 'Cuba Gooding Jr.' things may come
Again, there’s another way to read her comment: that she’s trying to fight the progressive supporters of this bill on their own ground by suggesting that the bill could empower (among others) racists.
It’s a good smackdown against woke politicians if she can show the unwoke uses to which their policies could be put.
Declaring there are boogeyman man racists out there looking to harm the progressives doesn't exactly decrease their own concerns.
Who knows, maybe she's progressive, maybe she's taunting progressives by citing unprogressive uses which could be made of this bill.
If you didn't see yesterday's thread sarc was saying nobody here who calls him out would listen to a brown person. The people who scream the loudest with accusations of racism of others are generally the most racist.
Dreamy dreamy Polis.
Oh, it's ok to poke government's nose into dating apps, just not like this bill. That's about as much of a "different approach" as choosing 9mm instead of .45 for the guns carried by EPA inspectors.
I thought Reason would cool on the Governor McDreamy suckholing after his gun control shenanigans.
Colorado Democratic governor signs 4 gun control bills into law
I was wrong.
2A isn’t a priority for Reason. See my post below, what are the odds they even cover that story?
Guns, gods, and clinging is soooo flyover country.
There's a reason Reason's tagline is 'Mexicans, ass-sex, and pot'.
These dating apps, with their, ah, special user base, seem like part of a plot to promote continence.
Of course, a government database will solve all these problems! /sarc
The government selecting breeding stock. Brave New World was just as much an instruction manual as 1984 for these types.
Dating as managed by the people at the DMV. And maybe actually managed by the DMV.
These dating apps, with their, ah, special user base, seem like part of a plot to promote continence.
Unless as a fetish, what does continence have to do with this? Is continence the opposite of "golden showers"?
🙂
😉
The problem is indeed with dating app users, but in a more fundamental way: they use an app to find dates.
Online mate-seeking has now reached over 50% of dating, replacing family, friends, social groups, work, etc. as ways of meeting people. And guess what? All those methods that rely on people have filters and other safety measures built in. Now the work-at-home, eat-at-home, play-at-home class wants the state to intervene in their date-at-home use of the infamously anonymous (and unfiltered) internet?
Possibly, but with the downfall of churches and other social groups, there are relatively few places to meet people.
And work especially has such potential negative consequences that I would never dream of asking out anyone from the office like in the 80s.
The Holodecks can't get here fast enough.
As someone who found their wife on a dating app, like most of the internet it depends on how you use it. Are there gross and/or dangerous people on dating apps? Of course there are! But those same gross and/or dangerous people can be found in bars, in churches, bowling alleys, at work, among your friends of friends, etc. The people on the internet are not inherently more gross and/or dangerous, but it's easier to cast a wider net and pull in more people of all types.
But here's the kicker. People posting kissy faces in the mirror or dick pics, they do it because for a certain segment of users it works. It might not be you, but it works for someone. If it doesn't interest you, just don't respond to it. I'm not going to say it's "unfortunate" that women have to deal with a lot of persistent men on dating apps, because that's the half of bargain that they get (even if they don't get to choose). For every woman complaining about overly persistent men on dating apps there's a man who does nothing but persist without getting any replies at all. That's just the reality of how it is. If you fight through it long enough you might get noticed by someone who actually cares about as a person though.
The root problem is deception by users and government should have no role in determining the truth in individual posts (see Covid). Now if a dating service got creative and published DMV or voter info that would be a valuable service.
Women famously shun MAGA males so imagine a check box for the unfortunate condition. Males lie of course. So just open up an API and fire away. Consent would be part of the user agreement.
It would be worth the extra cost to most users to get say - a credit score or party affiliation.
"Women famously shun MAGA males"
A MAGA male features in every AWFULs Fifty-Shades-of-Grey rape fantasy. A big brute of a man stealing her away from her pudgy, blue-haired, proggy boyfriend.
But you know who doesn't have rape fantasies? That kid you have tied up in your basement.
MAGA-males like Senators Lindy Graham and Down-Lo Bro Tim Scott are the subjects of female rape fantasies? Which one is the "big brute of a man"?
You have quite the imagination.
"MAGA-males like Senators Lindy Graham"
You have quite the imagination. Next you're going to tell us Lynn Cheney, John McCain, Tim Ryan, Mitch McConnell and Mitt Romney were MAGA too.
Shit like this that wouldn't even trick a toddler is why Open Society fired you.
Next you’re going to tell us Lynn Cheney, John McCain, Tim Ryan, Mitch McConnell and Mitt Romney were MAGA too.
It depends on the time of day. When Mitch McConnell was helping Trump get his nominees on the Supreme Court, then he was MAGA. When Mitch McConnell was condemning Trump for not doing enough to stop the riot on Jan. 6, then he was off the MAGA train. It's all about loyalty to Trump.
As per usual, you are wrong.
Trump is the living embodiment of Milton's test, "make the bad people do the right thing."
Getting judges through the senate is back-scratching.
Fascist Jeffy supports the judges democrats nominate.
MAGA Mac supports Trump stealing government property, sexually assaulting women, and trying to get the election overturned using extra-legal means.
[R] Mac supports Trump stealing government property, sexually assaulting women, and trying to get the election overturned using extra-legal means.
No he doesn't. Stop projecting; it announces a manifestly dilute ethos unbecoming a self-proclaimed radical individualist.
Ask Jeff what extra legal means is. Because trump petitioned government which is legal.
He doesn't even believe the bullshit he posted. He's in a rage and flailing. I've actually been involved in helping women abused by sexual assault. He's a sick fuck for saying that but he doesn't care.
He's attacking me for pointing out his support of fascism. And in the most disgusting way possible.
I’ve actually been involved in helping women abused by sexual assault. He’s a sick fuck for saying that but he doesn’t care.
Like that fat fuck has ever known the touch of a woman in the first place.
Lindsey Graham is the opposite of MAGA you lying pedo.
Imagine if was was not lying, and actually thinks of Graham as a MAGA brute.
He and sarc were claiming the uniparty who voted for the spending bill were MAGA just yesterday.
No, Miss Lindsey endorsed Donnie:
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2023/04/23/sotu-lindsey-graham-trump-endorsement-scott-haley.cnn
However, the fact that he is a lying two-faced politician is duly noted.
You’re a fucking moron.
So anyone who voted for Trump over Biden or Hillary is full blown MAGA?
Is that you Joe? Would explain why you like child porn.
is full blown MAGA?
Not always. Some are limp-wristed MAGA.
Define MAGA for the group. Like most narrative words you use, this should be fun.
Yeah, now I'm actually curious as to what Buttplug thinks for a change.
MAGA = any idiot who believes America is only great when Fatass Donnie is president.
So you don't actually have a real definition?
Show me one person who has ever made that assertion.
Why don't YOU define MAGA. While you are at it, define Uniparty and define Deep State.
MAGA – Those loyal to The Donald, True President of the United States, Smiter of Illegals, Taxer of Imports, Enemy of The Left, and Savior of the Nation.
Uniparty – Democrats and Republicans who wear matching unitards under their suits, and vote in unison against MAGA politicians.
Deep State – A secret organization within the government working against Americans to take over the government, and the world. It’s the same nonsense that’s been said about Freemasons, Templar, and all those other shadow groups conspiring against all that is good. They’ve just given it a new name.
Broken.
Retard and retarder.
It's a slogan Trump put on some hats. That's all it is. Some democrats have attempted to turn it into a slur, which is really pretty bizarre if you think about it.
He's like that anti immigrantnhyper Maga guy... Bernie sanders
Women famously shun MAGA males so imagine a check box for the unfortunate condition.
That’s for sure. “No MAGA” or “No Trump supporters” is so common on dating profiles it should be a check box like “no smokers.”
I see. So this is why incels have all moved to the left.
Ironically almost every married couple I know leans conservative.
Guess if you want to swipe right as you drink yourself to death, be anti maga?
“No MAGA” or “No Trump supporters” is so common on dating profiles
Today I learned that:
1. Sarcasmic cruises dating apps, and,
2. his matches are woke women
1. I have been on dating apps, but it’s been a while.
2. I ignore anyone who puts politics in their profile, regardless of what the politics are.
So you’re wrong on both counts. Not that it matters. You’re only interested in telling lies about people so I'm sure you'll be repeating what you just said until people believe it.
So you were makingg a bald assertion you have no evidence of to get a head pat from shrike?
What did I "lie" about, you stupid shit?
You just confirmed you used dating apps, and if you weren't given woke women matches how would you know that all your matches said “No MAGA” or “No Trump supporters”?
When you go and equate some with all, are you lying or showing off how stupid you are?
It's one or the other. Which is it?
I swear you get dumber by the day. While being a hypocrite. You do this all the time. Especially regarding illegals.
Oh, and there were some pro-Trump women as well. They’re easy to spot since they like to pose with their 80s hairstyles in front of their rusty trucks parked outside their trailers. Bad grammar and misspelled words are always a giveaway.
Poor sarc.
I’ll take things that sarc is making up for $200 Alex.
The Daily Double!
(actually the daily too many times to count)
Did MSNBC contributors give you this lie?
Awe, poor sarc.
The Anti- Make America Great Again crowd.
It's literally amazing how open leftards can be about their de-stain for America.
Here's a thought. Maybe if leftards hate it so much they should LEAVE and move their self-entitled cry-baby *sses to their utopian [Na]tional So[zi]alist nation instead of being the 'user' problem in a nation they despise.
Ironically; Most of these Anti-USA individuals migrated here from their utopian self-generated nightmare because the real 'utopia' is ultimate selfishness and greed and armed-theft from which they've already sucked (like leaches) the prosperity out of the last environment dry. Their baseline is to eat the cake and have it too. To graze off of others pastures. 100% selfish consumption without any desire to produce that of which they desire.
And that my friend is exactly the 'user' problem on dating sites.
Oh, my Colorado, what has happened to you? You once exemplified the spirit of the west, that independent streak exemplified by prospectors, ranchers, railroad tycoons, and brash entrepreneurs who built up towns and cities and seldom sought to inhibit the actions and beliefs of others.
Now we suffer from metro-tyranny, with attitudes dominated by do-gooder West Coast socialism and eagerness to intrude on every aspect of public and private life.
"You once exemplified the spirit of the west, that independent streak exemplified by prospectors, ranchers, railroad tycoons, and brash entrepreneurs "
And no women. Those were the days.
You might be on to something. How many women, and new-age cultivated men, would prefer to stay home where things are safe?
Why leave home if there's a treasure of false reports targeting people of color at your fingertips? Maybe one of your brash entrepreneurs sees an opportunity here.
exemplified by prospectors, ranchers, railroad tycoons, and brash entrepreneurs
That Colorado had clean, respectable, affordable whorehouses everywhere. That made it unnecessary for men to be constantly on the prowl for pussy.
Maybe not just pussy. A visit to Leadville Colorado was one of Wilde’s highlights in his tour of America.
Oscar Wilde stood on this wooden stage 137 years ago wearing silk stockings, velvet coat and profusion of lace while explaining the wonders of art to a packed house of grimy silver miners.
...
He told the crowd of 888 at Tabor Opera House the tale of Italian master Benvenuto Cellini, a silversmith, but the miners misunderstood the time frame. They asked why Wilde had failed to bring Cellini with him. Easy answer: Cellini died in 1571.
“Who shot him?” a voice shouted from the crowd.
,,,
After his lecture, Wilde strolled across the street to a “dancing saloon” and saw a notice posted over the piano. It’s the most famous sign in saloon history.
“PLEASE DO NOT SHOOT THE PIANIST,” the notice read. “HE IS DOING HIS BEST.” The dancing saloon, the Silver Dollar, remains open for drinks.
https://gazette.com/news/remembering-the-leadville-night-oscar-wilde-charmed-grimy-silver-miners-david-ramsey/article_e90207a0-bdff-11e9-ade4-6bfcb17aec3c.html
like the man who brought me to a cafeteria, drank a beverage that he packed for himself without asking me if I wanted one, grilled me for 15 minutes, and ghosted.
You got out of that one with minimal cost. He was probably a Dave Ramsey type. Stay the fuck away from them.
Who the fuck is Dave Ramsey?
He is the MAGA male financial advisor. For dudes who can't figure out how credit cards work. #2 in AM talk radio now that Fat Rush is fini.
The Financial Whisperer to Trump’s America
Dave Ramsey has spent 25 years helping radio listeners climb out of debt. What does he see behind their economic anxiety?
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/03/11/radio-dave-ramsey-2018-trump-217229/
Lol. Have to defend credit card debt since it has surged under Biden. Never change man. Never change.
No one is defending credit card debt, you liar.
The 2018 Politico article linked above noted the problem in 2018. I am just surprised that high-interest revolving credit needed to be explained to millions of Trump boys.
That's not all Ramsey does retard. Lol. It is one part of his financial advice.
But keep defending getting into debt and shunning someone who has helped tens of thousands at this point.
ML is clearly correct regarding him getting fired. This one is nonsensical.
Remember. He is the one advocating buying Taylor Swift concert tickets off credit cards to prove the economy is booming.
Why do you respond to him? All he does is lie. I glanced at the page before signing in and noticed he lied about me twice. I'll keep him on mute though so I won't be tempted to defend myself.
Why do you respond to him?
This site is my only interaction with conservatives.
In real life I avoid discussing politics with conservatives. They just get angrier.
I could see that if he was a conservative. But he's not. He's nothing but an attack dog that defends Trump, and Trump is not a conservative at all.
Lol. Back to defending the old guard "good" conservatives after trying to blame the "bad" ones for the spending bill?
Youre right. I'm not conservative. I'm actually a libertarian. Not a liberaltarian who defends and deflects for the left on every topic.
Sarc’s a libertarian that supported the proxy war against Russia.
I see. So you subscribe to a non intellectual bubble. No wonder all you have is narratives.
"This site is my only interaction with conservatives."
Zero surprises there.
"In real life I avoid discussing politics with conservatives. They just get angrier."
Of course, if you trolled, harassed and shitposted IRL like you do here you'd always be picking up your teeth.
Of course, if you trolled, harassed and shitposted IRL like you do here you’d always be picking up your teeth.
I think that wins the ironic hypocrisy prize for the year.
sarcasmic 2 years ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
If you said that to me in public, and I put your internet-tuff-gai-ass in the hospital, the cops would laugh at you when you tried to press charges.
Actually I think your post kind does, trollio.
Interesting. How does Butt Plug know they are conservatives without interacting with them?
Guess he's just another liar, a modern version of that old aphorism: you know he's lying when his fingers are typing.
MAGA hats are a reliable sign.
MAGA hats are a sign of authoritarianism, not conservatism.
MAGA hats are a sign of authoritarianism, not conservatism.
Fair point.
So you two are asserting all conservatives wear MAGA hats?
Do you two understand how dumb both of you sound?
Plugs just trolling and Sarc is drunk (and trolling).
Yep, turd lies.
Do you think Linsey Graham is MAGA, sarc?
If it will make the pedo promise to be his friend, yes.
What lie sarc? People can look at yesterday's thread. Just because you drunkenly blacked out doesn't mean you didnt post.
He's great. I used his debt snowball to rid myself and my wife of debt. Took 8 years. Within a year of the divorce she'd already racked up thousands in credit card bills. What a waste. I still pay mine in full every month.
He does provide a valuable service. It's just that personal finance is not very complicated. My original point is that high-end chicks are looking for a dude that doesn't need Ramsey's advice.
Back in the 90s I got dropped by a smoking-hot 35 yr old female childless exec for being worth only $250,000. I'm just glad I got the test drive.
Personal finance is not about the math, it is about the behavior. That is what makes it difficult. Anyone who graduated highschool can do the math associated with budgeting. But it takes discipline and sacrifice to really do what it takes to get out of debt and cut back the lifestyle so as to live within one's means.
Anyone who graduated highschool can do the math associated with budgeting.
LOL.
Right. There are high school graduates who are completely illiterate and innumerate. I've worked with some of them.
"Anyone who graduated highschool can do the math associated with budgeting."
Poor Sarc.
Haha, Fascist Jeffy just dunked on his buddy sarc.
Do you find it odd your new besty just slandered him for no apparent reason?
Did you mistake sarc for being principled?
So Sarc had credit issues? So what? Donnie has filed bankruptcy six times and hopefully once again soon.
And shrike once again applauds fascist use of government against people he hates. Shocking.
Credit issues? This is why these nitwits are best on mute. Having credit card debt and having credit issues are totally different matters. They're either too stupid to understand that, or doing their usual tactic of telling lies to goad someone into defending themselves. I can never tell which. Who was it. Oh, Big Mac? Definitely the former. That guy's several lumens short of a candlepower in a world full of flood lamps.
Didn't you say you once were bankrupt and living out of your car and sleeping on friends couches?
Nope. That's what they said after playing "telephone" with a long line of losers. I won't tell you what it started as. The truth is much less entertaining.
You never admitted you were homeless once?
So sarc is either lying now or lying then. My guess is now.
Lmao, sarc is actually arguing against what turd is posting and doesn’t even realize it.
He isnt the brightest piece of shit in Maine.
Having credit card debt and having credit issues are totally different matters. They’re either too stupid to understand that, or doing their usual tactic of telling lies to goad someone into defending themselves.
You wouldn't look so retarded if you actually read what arguments are being made instead of lies and assertions of shrike, jeff, or your own delusions.
Dave Ramsey has some very sound advice for getting out of debt and living on less than you make. He is absolutely right on how to budget. It is essential to controlling where your money goes. If you don't control your money, then your money controls you. If that is not one of his sayings, then it should be.
His *investment* advice, however, is rather naive. No one is ever going to get rich in the stock market following his advice. It is however good starter advice for the confused newbie who has no idea what the difference is between all of the different investment vehicles. But it shouldn't be relied upon for long-term investing.
I didn’t follow his advice to the letter. Just set up an emergency fund and used the snowball to get rid of old debt. Mostly hers. One thing he stresses is that you’re not going to get ahead when others have a claim to your paycheck. He’s right about that.
you’re not going to get ahead when others have a claim to your paycheck.
Including the government and deadbeat ex-wives?
Ramsey says a handful of GOP presidential candidates reached out in 2016 to solicit advice. Rick Santorum asked him over dinner what he wanted to see the next president do to help the economy, Ramsey says. His response: “As little as possible.”
And MAGA people like him? That’s odd, because The Donald plans to do a fucking lot to “help” the economy. Of course he’s also got the “Taxes hurt the economy” crowd screaming “What do we want? Import taxes! When do we want them? Now! How high should they be? One hundred per-fucking-cent! More taxes! More taxes!” from the rooftops.
It's bizarre.
Only bizarre if you’re ignorant pushing CNN talking points.
Tax cuts and doubled personal exemption. Also pushed deregulation costs which dwarf import taxes. The fact that you’re still ignorant to basic facts isn’t bizarre.
And that pesky fact dems want to tax you so much more. Never talk about that do you?
Lol.
He still can't name a single president who hasn't used tariff powers. It is utterly amazing how this is thenone anti trump argument he is most boisterous about while ignoring everything else.
REPUBLICAN FAMILY VALUES UPDATE! FAKE IMPEACHMENT LIAR JAMES COMER EDITION!
A woman who dated gubernatorial candidate James Comer while the two were in college said in a letter to The Courier-Journal on Monday that he was physically and mentally abusive to her during what she said was a two-year relationship.
.
"Did Jamie Comer ever hit me? Yes," wrote Marilyn Thomas, who attended Western Kentucky University with Comer in the early 1990s.
.
She said Comer became "enraged" in 1991 after they visited a Louisville abortion clinic and learned that she had used his real name on a form requiring proof that she had an escort to drive her home.
2015
https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/politics/elections/kentucky/2015/05/04/james-comer-domestic-violence/26901137/
#RisingGOP-Star
Is this as credible as Ford?
Believe her! But not her.
Neat how every time a Republican runs for a position, some prog claims he touched her thirty years ago and only managed to find the courage to come forward when it's politically convenient for the Democrats.
Liberal taqiya.
Christian Nationalists are at it again!
Congress rings alarm bells about gun control over DOJ’s ‘National Extreme Risk’ center
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/congress-rings-alarm-bells-about-gun-control-over-doj-s-national-extreme-risk-center/ar-BB1kpRjN
They are correct. Every doj employee with a gun is a threat to americans
In a you can't make this up news...
Letitia James is defending a historical property owner who grants her campaign events in a case of a fraudulent 3M loan against elevated property values. The group stopped repaying months after obtaining the loan and James is using her power to stop foreclosure on the property to repay the loan.
https://nypost.com/2024/03/17/opinion/an-irish-society-an-unpaid-loan-and-the-hypocrisy-of-letitia-james/
Is that grift too local?
The hypocrisy is the point. It's to let the other side know that the Democrats can do anything and they can do nothing. It's primary aim is to demoralize the opposition, and bankrupting the victims is just a pleasant bonus.
And Fascist Jeffy cheers them at every step.
The Stanford Professor at the heart of Obama Common Core math deceleration program meant to promote equity while slowing down math learning based their entire research on fraudulent data.
https://www.joannejacobs.com/post/algebra-for-none-fails-in-san-francisco
Nothing says progress like making the smart kids wait for the dummies to catch up.
Progress is white supremacy.
Now the doo-gooders in the Colorado legislature wants to tamper with dating apps.
This tells me they have too much time on their hands and/or a bigger bunch of Karens than I thought.
Colorado was better off when all the progressives were hippies, getting stoned in Boulder.
It seems that they were planning to take over the world between trips - - - - - -
The Colorado state legislators are the most fundamentally retarded people you'll see outside of Sacramento. Just a bunch of poli-sci majors, idiot females, and mystery meats who think the policies they think up while getting stoned are functional in the real world.
All while trying to out-do California.
The state legislature is so retarded, that two freshmen Democrat reps actually resigned their positions last year rather than waste their time. And their own fucking party is in complete control of the state Congress!
"like the man who brought me to a cafeteria, drank a beverage that he packed for himself without asking me if I wanted one, grilled me for 15 minutes, and ghosted."
Wait a minute.
You actually accepted an invitation to a CAFETERIA?
I guess that explains why you use dating apps.
Chicks be dumb sometimes.
She said "brought me". Maybe she was tied up in the trunk.
That's pretty scary...especially if there were bears in the trunk.
Another election, another mysterious 10 thousand ballots out of nowhere.
https://www.nbcchicago.com/illinois-election-2024/more-than-10k-ballots-mistakenly-left-out-added-to-unofficial-vote-count-chicago-board-of-elections/3391532/
Clean elections, no fraud, trust the institutions.
Thing is, there are Democrats locally who are now wondering if Trump and the right might just have been right regarding 2020. It’s so blatant and obvious that even lifelong Democrats are stunned.
Stunned but still will vote a straight (D) ticket.
No widespread fraud.
Current vote delta was less than 25% of the "found" vote by mail. Of course not widespread. Just have to punch it over the line.
Word is, they didn't expect so many Republicans to pull Democrat primary ballots. Illinois is an open primary state so you can declare which party's ballot you want when you get to the election judge on election day (or request by mail). Apparently, tens of thousands of Republicans voted as "Democrats" just to vote for Eileen Burke over Clayton Harris. The current thought is that they are in a panic as they didn't print enough ballots with Harris on them.
Exactly the amount needed to secure the wins.
coNsPirAcY tHeoRY
So something the NYT will admit was true, in about 6 months?
But Reason won't for three years.
I've been watching this shitshow for the past several days now.
And it's all for, get this, a Democrat versus Democrat primary. Eileen Burke was up by over 10,000 votes at the end of Tuesday. Every day since, more votes have been "found", and her lead over Clayton Harris, the Machine and Preckwinkle's choice, has dwindled to about 4,000. Now, the Chicago Board of Elections "finds" another 10,000 uncounted votes. Apparently the mail-in and drop box votes are running 60%+ for Harris.
https://twitter.com/TheMarkSchipper/status/1771694534881104040
https://twitter.com/IsIllinois/status/1771754863686201627
Here's the guy (Max Bever) running the Chicago Board of Elections.
https://twitter.com/CPD1617Scanner/status/1771887087396032963
Mistakenly, my ass.
https://twitter.com/Agent1Security/status/1771728812608286724
A bill recently introduced in Colorado aims to make dating apps such as Hinge and Bumble safer for users...
So, Bumble not allowing men to speak to women until a woman speaks to them first simply doesn't protect women enough? Not sure how to interpret that, really.
Women really must not have any agency if they need so much paternalistic over protection, or to quote Jack Nicholson in As Good As It Gets:
Woman: How do you write women so well?
Nicholson: I think of a man, then I take away reason and accountability.
This is what happens when women rule.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1168182/Catfights-handbags-tears-toilets-When-producer-launched-women-TV-company-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html
When I was in the military, I was in a shop that was probably 50% female when I got there after my Korea tour. Tons of backbiting, gossiping, and stupid high school drama.
Not coincidentally, a lot of that shit ended when the shop went down to about 10% female in a year and a half due to PCSs, cross-training, and separations.
I don't know how anyone who has worked with more than one or two women could imagine that's how it would work out.
Legit? Not familiar with this guy.
https://twitter.com/_misfitpatriot_/status/1771674503925342566
My doorbell automatically records while in use... makes me question it a bit. But then again, only this instance. There have been enough reports woth the J6 and parent school board folks for us to know this happens.
Just because he's paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get him.
Here's an idea. Put down the fucking phone, get out of the basement go down to the local bar and ask a pretty girl to dance. Do people like not do that anymore? Or join a club or a church. Or let a friend hook you up. Don't people have friends anymore? Sit down and have a fucking conversation face to face. Yeah it's scary. Every accomplishment you'll ever achieve in this life is scary. If you're not terrified you're not doing it right. But we need the government to regulate dating? Seriously? We are a nation of crybabies that apparently can't get their shit together even to fulfill their most primal needs.
Went to the bar yesterday with the wife to watch a couple games and get a pizza. No dancing but there was definitely interactions between younger people of the opposite sex. I think it depends on where you live.
Glad to hear that. I don't get around much anymore.
"go down to the local bar "
The local bar is subject to more government regulation than online dating apps. The brewers and distilleries are subject to even more government regulation. It's probably best to stick with dating apps, at least for now.
Whoosh!
Air travel? Government regulation. Better to walk.
Are there any churches with bars?
The Catholics will give you a sip of wine and a cracker at the end, there.
Ep. 83 The Biden administration is trying to send an 82-year veteran to prison for life for the crime of repeating ‘Russian misinformation.’ The scariest, most important criminal case you’ve probably never heard of.
https://twitter.com/tuckercarlson/status/1771294532325257685?
This guy is a hardcore Black Socialist. Being indicted for “sowing discord, spreading pro-Russia propaganda and interfering in elections within the United States.” (?). 1A be damned.
https://nypost.com/2023/04/21/socialists-charged-with-aiding-russia-after-fbi-raids/
Every day there's some sort of fascist outrage that would be absolutely unthinkable in a democratic country fifteen years ago, and does Reason ever mention anything about it?
Not if Mexicans, weed, and butt sex are not affected.
Oh yeah, what about Christmas?
— Fascist Jeffy
R Mac is the troll who intrinsically accepts all of the Christian stuff that is automatically baked into our laws and culture and society, and then says "but those Christians aren't imposing anything on me!"
Fascist Jeffy doesn't understand (actually he does, he's lying) the difference between cultural norms and the fascism he supports.
Because his comment is, literally, defending a violation of free speech. Gaear is pointing out a man being thrown in a cage for speech.
An actual man, an actual individual, in an actual cage, for speech. All libertarians should be outraged.
But here's Fascist Jeffy complaining about people getting Christmas off. Will you get arrested and thrown in a cage working on Christmas? Of course not. I even told him I've done as such with no repercussions. Millions of people work on Christmas in this country without threat of imprisonment. He had no response because he's a dishonest piece of shit. He doesn't actually care about people being thrown in a cage. That's what kind of "individualist" he is. Who gets thrown in a cage doesn't matter to him. He admitted as much, he's more interested in semantic arguments.
This is why I now call him Fascist Jeffy. He'll tell you it's because I like to call names. Do I call you names? I'm pretty selective in who I call names. If you're not an enemy of liberty I've never called you a name.
It would be a lovely day if we found out Jeff had fallen under a boxcar and been minced into a quarter ton of pork slurry.
With our luck he'd just lose legs and end up forming Les Assassins en Fauteuils Roulants.
So I think I have figured out the pro-Trump types. It starts with two simple premises:
1. They really do believe Democrats are not just merely wrong, but downright evil and traitors in all but name.
2. They have stopped viewing politics as a contest between different legitimate ideas, but instead as a battleground in which the war between the Real Patriotic Heroes (them) is fought between the Evil Treasonous Vermin (them).
If you start with these two premises, then it all makes sense:
1. They will support Trump no matter what. It does not matter at all how many times he is indicted, it does not matter how many crimes he may actually have committed, it does not matter how immoral he is in his personal life, it does not matter frankly what policies he advocates. Because Trump is their General in the war against the Evil Villainous Democrats. When a soldier is at war, the general's personal problems are irrelevant. All that matters is that the good loyal soldiers follow the general's orders to defeat the enemy. Who cares if the general bends a few rules or cheats on his wife? The only thing that matters is victory.
2. Discussing issues with them is completely pointless. All that matters is the tactics and strategies that will be necessary to defeat the Evil Villainous Democrats. Who cares if the national debt is out of control, or who cares about the moral intricacies of the abortion issue? None of that matters. All that matters is whatever it takes to defeat the Evil Villainous Democrats. To wit:
- They oppose gun control not because they prioritize liberty, but because they want to make sure they have their guns in case they need to shoot a few Democrats.
- They are in favor of restrictive abortion laws, not because of any conscientious commitment to protecting life, but because they think the issue harms Democrats.
- They are in favor of restricting immigration at the border, not because of welfare or crime or stealing jobs, but because they view immigrants as new recruits for The Enemy, and they want to stop the Evil Villainous Democrats from getting more recruits.
So if this is right, to reach these Trump people, discussing issues with them is pointless, and discussing Trump's troubles and faults is pointless. What has to happen instead is to humanize the other side. Democrats are not evil monsters, they are people just like them. And to be fair, the same has to happen for Democrats: they have to view MAGA Trump voters as not some caricature of inbred racist hillbillies, but instead as real people just like them. That is what has to happen.
Of course this is difficult, because to the Trump crowd, treating Democrats as people sure sounds like "consorting with the enemy". That is why the whole warlike analogy has to go away. It is not accurate and it is not right. Politics is not a battlefield, it is just the way we attempt to solve shared problems together, for better or for worse.
Stop viewing them as The Enemy, and stop behaving like you're in a state of war. Then and only then can we have a productive discussion on issues that matter.
Project much there, Jeffy?
This is like the 5th time you've posted this, so I'll only address the part that matters:
They have stopped viewing politics as a contest between different legitimate ideas, but instead as a battleground in which the war between the Real Patriotic Heroes (them) is fought between the Evil Treasonous Vermin (them).
Politics is not a noble pursuit. There exists no policy, rule, or guideline that works (or can be described as effective) without a threat of force.
Therefore politics cannot be intrinsically noble. Thus, it will always be a battlefield.
I just find it funny that the biggest leftist partisan here, jeff, continues to claim he doesn’t have a side.
Jeff's not very original, and I think it's copypasted most of it from some NeverTrumper site.
Who cares if the national debt is out of control, or who cares about the moral intricacies of the abortion issue? None of that matters.
Pretty sure that the Democrats are the ones pushing abortion till birth and running up most of the debt, so maybe you want some other examples.
All that matters is whatever it takes to defeat the Evil Villainous Democrats.
the Democrat party is the oldest and most enduring racist political party in history, and its racism continues to this day. Here are the facts:
The Democrat Party was founded in 1828. Its first national party platform, ratified during the 1840 Presidential election, stated: “ that all efforts by abolitionists or others, made to induce congress to interfere with questions of slavery… are calculated to lead to the most alarming and dangerous consequences, and that all such efforts have an inevitable tendency to diminish the happiness of the people… and ought not to be countenanced by any friend to our political institutions.”
The message was clear: the Democrat Party did not consider Black Americans to be “people” deserving of “happiness.”
That same language was in every national Democrat party platform for the next 16 years.
Democrat party leaders acted on their racist principles, committing high treason against their country and their fellow Americans between 1861-1865 in order to preserve the system of Black human bondage.
In 1868, the Democrat Party platform urged amnesty for the traitors who, during the Civil War, killed hundreds of thousands of Americans for the purpose of preserving slavery. The platform also called for “the abolition of the Freedmen’s Bureau; and all political instrumentalities designed to secure negro supremacy”:
In 1904, seventy-six years after its founding, the Democrat party’s platform complained about the Republican platform:
“The race question has brought countless woes to this country. The calm wisdom of the American people should see to it that it brings no more.
To revive the dead and hateful race and sectional animosities in any part of our common country means confusion, distraction of business, and the reopening of wounds now happily healed. We therefore deprecate and condemn the Bourbon-like selfish, and narrow spirit of the recent Republican Convention at Chicago which sought to kindle anew the embers of racial and sectional strife, and we appeal from it to the sober common sense and patriotic spirit of the American people.” . . .
Throughout most of the 20th century, Democrats condoned or excused policies of apartheid and disenfranchisement of Black Americans.
Wilson to resegregated the Civil Service. Then senate Democrats successfully filibustered a Republican led anti-lynching bill in 1934, and a Republican-led effort to ban the poll tax in 1940. At the time, the poll tax was so effective in the American South that only 3% of Black Americans were registered to vote there.
Elected Democrats fought tooth and nail against anti-racist legislation, filibustering the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and engaging in so-called “massive resistance” against school integration into the early 1970s.
A century and half of racist policies vigorously supported by Democrat party leaders — no other political party in history comes close - and it continues to this day.
And that was just against the Blacks. There was the Democrat's genocide of indigenous people through the Indian Wars, their ethnic cleansing of the Cherokee and other Indian tribes (Trail of tears, etc), the Asian immigration laws, the Japanese internment, etc.
Then Tammany Hall, the Chicago Machine, the Nixon/Kennedy election shenanigans, late term abortion, housing projects, social media censorship, gun control, anti-speech measures, lawfare against political opponents, child sex operations, ad nauseam...
The Democrats are indeed Evil and Villainous.
Where did you copy-paste that from?
The Democrats are indeed Evil and Villainous.
Fine, have it your way. What is your plan to stop Evil Villainous Democrats? You have previously said that they are one short step away from being Nazis. So what is your plan to stop the almost-Nazis? Historically there has been only one way to stop Nazis, and that is with extreme use of physical violence. But hey, maybe you have another way to stop Nazis without killing them. Do you think they will respect the results of elections that they lose? Do you think they will ultimately be restrained by judges' orders against them? Do you think they will respect the Constitution? Of course not, THEY'RE FUCKING NAZIS. So at this point your only hope to stop them is with "extra-legal" means. What's your plan? Do you think your shit-posting at Reason is a viable plan to stop the Nazis?
Truth is, you claim to think they are Nazis yet you do nothing of substance to try to stop them. So either you are utterly powerless - which you are not, no one is - or you don't really believe they are Nazis. It is all an act designed to whip people into an emotional rage to drive them to the polls to vote for your team.
Because YOUR TEAM CANNOT WIN ANY OTHER WAY. You cannot win on the strength of your positive vision for the future because you don't have a positive vision for the future. All your team has is cynical demagoguery.
Maybe you really are a true believer, but the people you listen to and read in your podcasts and social media feeds who feed you this crap, they don't really believe it. They just feed you endless content of hate that you consume in order to drive your clicks and eyeballs to their sites. You are a mark. You are being used.
Oh and the bottom feeders in Team Blue aren't much better. They did the same crap when Trump was in charge. Why do you think they continually called him a Nazi? FOR THE VERY SAME FUCKING REASON that your team now calls Democrats Nazis all the time. Because it was to fool their idiot base to give them money and power.
So there is no hope to convince you, but to everyone else reading this, don't be an easily fooled dupe like ML here. And don't be one of the easily fooled morons who hangs on every word of MSNBC content either. Be a truly independent thinker and reject the emotional appeals from both teams. Don't vote for Trump and don't vote for Biden either. Both teams are horrible and neither team deserves your support.
"Then Tammany Hall, the Chicago Machine, the Nixon/Kennedy election shenanigans, late term abortion, housing projects, social media censorship, gun control, anti-speech measures, lawfare against political opponents, child sex operations, ad nauseam…"
Small potatoes. Read about the how the civil war was fought in and around Kansas. The James gang were marauding thieves and murderers not above scalping their Radical Republican rivals, fashioning souvenir necklaces of ears from their corpses and so on. After a while the Republicans reciprocated in kind.
Hey everyone, this guy’s a fed.
Meh. Judge the parties on their merits now. The Democrats still are awful (and racist) without having to dredge up the past. No need to draw on things that people who have been dead for generations did.
You cheer democrats imprisoning their political opponents then post this bullshit?
Do you think that if you repeat that lie often enough, that it will become truth?
Your response to Peter Navarro being imprisoned:
chemjeff radical individualist 5 days ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
When a Democrat breaks the law, is caught, and sent to jail, that is called ‘justice’.
When a Republican breaks the law, is caught, and sent to jail, that is called ‘political persecution’.
You see, Republicans are inherently good people. They are Real Muricans who believe in the real American values that Real Patriots are supposed to believe in. Therefore if they break the law, they should be given the benefit of the doubt. They had good intentions and were trying to do the right thing.
But Democrats are inherently evil people. They are traitors in all but name only. They hate America and *when* they break the law, it is evidence of their evil criminal intent and they should be locked up forever, if not summarily executed
That's right. I'm mocking you and your team for always whining about "political persecution" whenever any Republican does something bad, regardless of whether the crime is valid or not. I'm not cheering anyone going to jail. I'm making fun of you.
Should Navarro be in prison?
Why do you lie about what I said?
Should Navarro be in prison?
Note Fascist Jeffy calls me a liar for saying he supports democrats imprisoning their opponents,. but he won't actually denounce them putting a man in prison. He's more concerned with Christmas.
You cheer Republicans forcing rape victims to give birth to their rapists' babies.
You're absolutely right. That was the number one priority at the recent White Patriarchy meeting.
How can you be so fucking retarded?
Another lie from Lying Jeffy. He knows it’s a lie and posted it anyway.
Seriously, what kind of sick fuck posts things he knows are lies about fucking rape? One of the most evil actions humans can do, and he’s lying about it to make himself feel good on an anonymous message board?
You’re fucked up dude.
Seriously, what kind of sick fuck posts things he knows are lies about fucking rape?
What kind of sick fuck posts things he knows are lies about pedophilia? Or about being a fascist or a Nazi? Or about cheering when someone goes to jail? Or any of the countless things that you lie about me on a daily basis? Hmm?
Why do you do it? This is why:
to make himself feel good on an anonymous message board
cite?
But seriously, why do you cheer when Republicans force rape victims to give birth to their rapists' children?
You're a psychopath.
Why do you cheer when your shitty friends on this message board do horrible things and advocate for horrible ideas, such as murdering political opponents or telling outright slanderous lies about others? What kind of sick fuck derives joy from the suffering of others, like you and your friends do on a daily basis?
And you whined that not letting child molesters into the country was "decreasing their liberty." Get the fuck off your high horse before your rolls of fat breaks its back.
"your shitty friends on this message board do horrible things"
Such as?
He knows it’s a lie and posted it anyway.
That would be what you do to me on a daily basis.
Well then it should be easy for you to post examples of me "cheer(ing) Republicans forcing rape victims to give birth to their rapists’ babies."
You're a sick fuck Fascist Jeffy. You realize everyone can read all this right? And everyone can see I've never posted anything like that?
You should go ahead and call me a racist while you're at it.
Stop viewing them as The Enemy, and stop behaving like you’re in a state of war. Then and only then can we have a productive discussion on issues that matter.
Them first. And "productive discussion on issues that matter" is just more glittering generalities by spineless "centrists" who don't actually stand for anything other than conflict avoidance.
You at least are more honest than ML, you are honest enough to admit that you favor authoritarian repression against the Evil Villainous Democrats. So I'll give you credit for that I suppose.
What is your plan for the repression? Gulags and death camps for Biden voters?
Again, fucking retarded. Do you have any clue to the regime that created the Gulag, their political agenda, and which US party still embraces those same politics and morality?
You’re evil Fascist Jeffy.
What kind of sick fuck posts things he knows are lies about calling people evil fascists?
The pseudonymous kind. I doubt the cowardly fuck would dare to do it using his own name.
LOL, feel free to post yours anytime. Remember, I actually gave KAR an address to meet me at when he said he was going to stab me in the temple.
My wife made me promise to keep my identity private because she was afraid they'd show up when I wasn't home, but I'd put my money on her if these fucking idiots showed up. They'd make good fertilizer.
"because she was afraid they’d show up when I wasn’t home"
She's afraid of people who'd make good fertilizer? Takes all kinds.
mtrueman is a fed.
"LOL, feel free to post yours anytime."
I feel free enough to decline.
"Remember, I actually gave KAR an address to meet me at when he said he was going to stab me in the temple. "
I don't remember but at least he didn't threaten to stab you in the church.
Fuck off fedboi.
I feel free enough to decline.
I doubt the cowardly fuck would dare to do it using his own name.
LOL
Who are you "mtrueman"? I've got some free time. Maybe you and Fascist Jeffy could both meet me together. I'm on record as being in SE Michigan. I'd only use my off hand to bitchslap both of you for fun, but I'd use both hands to end you both.
"Who are you “mtrueman”?"
Just a guy who makes good fertilizer. I wouldn't want to scare your wife.
Fuck off fed.
What lies Fascist Jeffy?
Give us some more of those glittering generalities, fat boy. "Issues that matter" is entirely subjective.
>1. They really do believe Democrats are not just merely wrong, but downright evil and traitors in all but name.
2. They have stopped viewing politics as a contest between different legitimate ideas, but instead as a battleground in which the war between the Real Patriotic Heroes (them) is fought between the Evil Treasonous Vermin (them).
So, basically, you're projecting your own internal mental state on others.
Now flip the parties and you see the basic problem of today's politics:
1. They really do believe
DemocratsRepublicans are not just merely wrong, but downright evil and traitors in all but name.2. They have stopped viewing politics as a contest between different legitimate ideas, but instead as a battleground in which the war between the Real Patriotic Heroes (us) is fought against the Evil Treasonous Vermin (them).
See, this is the kind of crap that has to stop.
Charlie Kirk: "Some people say, but Charlie, what do the Democrats want? They want the full and complete destruction of the United States of America. They do not want a better country. They do not want you to live in a better tomorrow."
Charlie Kirk: " If you vote Democrat as a Christian, I think you can you can no longer call yourself a Christian. You have to call yourself something else. I do not think you could be a Christian and vote Democrat."
https://youtu.be/EdsUwAWQsDU?si=MJlIqLLEGgwgYHDI&t=2999
This is ridiculous. It paints Democrats as evil monsters. This type of rhetoric and this type of garbage is what has to go.
If you've been watching the election shitshow in Chicago, then you know Democrats are bad.
"This is ridiculous. It paints Democrats as evil monsters. This type of rhetoric and this type of garbage is what has to go."
Democrats are evil monsters. Baby-killing child castrationists, anti-speech zealots, social-media censors, kangaroo-court-officiating politruks, pedophile porn purveyors in schools, gun grabbers, Gaia cultists, anti-Christian bigots, and fascists who try to imprison and bankrupt their political opponents.
Your party needs to be completely destroyed, Jeffy.
Fascist Jeffy loves all that shit.
What is your plan to "completely destroy" the Democratic Party?
What is your plan to destroy MAGA? Oh wait, I already know, and you’re supporting it. Use the government to jail and bankrupt them. Like a good fascist.
What kind of sick fuck posts things he knows are lies about other people supporting “destroying MAGA”?
Poor sarc..
You don't want to destroy MAGA?
The Democrats have said, repeatedly, that the US is a horrible, structurally racist, state that has committed genocide and war crimes.
Their stated aims - the stuff they publicly admit - is to infiltrated every institution and change them radically from the inside. Ie, to destroy them and rebuild the nation in their preferred image.
Just because when they're done the nation will still be called 'the United States' doesn't mean it wasn't destroyed and something else built in its place.
I don't know where this is going but the story is starting to stink like a Nord Stream pipeline.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/us-nato-issue-rare-solidarity-messages-after-moscow-attack-death-toll-rises-137
Meanwhile, the Russian government has continued to question what intelligence concerning the planned attack that Washington may have had ahead of time. In a March 7 emergency alert, the US Embassy in Moscow said it was "monitoring reports that extremists have imminent plans to target large gatherings in Moscow, to include concerts."
The embassy further urged all US nationals in the country to remain vigilant and "monitor local media for updates." The Kremlin has demanded answers and even raised the possibility of Western involvement, given also the current claims that the terrorists may have had a 'Ukraine connection'.
"We did not receive any notifications or messages in advance," Antonov told RIA. However, White House spokesman John Kirby has sought to clarify, "I’m not aware of any advance knowledge that we had of this."
Remember, the CIA supported Isis to defeat Bashar al-Assad, who was supported by Putin. Isis claimed responsibility for the attack. So yes, it’s plausible the CIA was behind this.
Hamas also teamed up with al Qaeda, the Saudis, the Americans, and Israel, against the Party of God and Iran, to defeat Assad. Al Qaeda at least had the decency to refrain from slaughtering Shiite Muslims. ISIS had no such qualms, and I don't think the US supported them. The US can be said to have supported the Taliban going back to the Carter years and the pullout from Afghanistan under Biden. It was an ISIS terror attack that killed some dozen US service persons and let's not forget a much larger number of Taliban militia members working along side the US troops providing security.
If the CIA or the Ukrainians were involved, it must have been a rogue operation. It's hard to imagine an official green light for it.
OK fed.
You won't think it's OK when I order my minions to do fed things to you.
Is there some obligation that the US notify them?
Do they not have their own internal security apparatus?
>And if a racist files a false report against every person of color,
And racists define 'racist' as 'person without color'? Racist.
I’ve only met one person in my life who had no color.
He was an albino.
And I'm pretty sure he has the same ancient African ancestry we all have.
These reports might even lead to law enforcement investigating innocent users.
Or at least checking out their private photo exchanges, just to be sure.
I’m just waiting for Shoshana to be in the latest MGTOW compilation videos about women-hitting-The-Wall.
🙂
😉