The National Debt Is a National Security Issue
The growing debt will "slow economic growth, drive up interest payments," and "heighten the risk of a fiscal crisis," the CBO warns.

It's a dangerously addictive habit that threatens to ruin our children's lives and undermine America's national security—and this week Congress finally acknowledged as much, although it remains unclear if lawmakers have the guts to do anything substantial.
No, I'm not talking about TikTok. I'm talking about the $34.6 trillion national debt.
The Senate unanimously approved a resolution on Wednesday calling the debt "a threat to the national security of the United States" and calling expected future budget deficits "unsustainable, irresponsible, and dangerous."
"We have more than doubled our national debt in just ten years," said Sen. Mike Braun (R–Ind.), who sponsored the resolution. "America is moving down a dangerous and unsustainable path of reckless spending and the federal government has yet to take it seriously."
The passage of a nonbinding resolution on the Senate floor is several steps short of actually addressing the federal government's addiction to borrowing—but, as they say, recognizing that you have a problem is the first step toward solving it.
And the approval of that resolution was timely. Later on Wednesday, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) published its latest long-term budget projections. The report shows that annual budget deficits are on pace to grow from an expected $1.6 trillion this year to $2.6 trillion in 2034, $4.4 trillion in 2044, and $7.3 trillion in 2054.
As a result of those rising budget deficits, the national debt will continue to accelerate upward. The CBO projects that the federal government's debt will total $114 trillion by 2054. The debt is already roughly the size of the nation's economy and is expected to surpass the all-time high of 106.4 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) by 2028. By the end of the 30-year projection, the debt is estimated to reach 166 percent of GDP.
"Such large and growing debt would have significant economic and financial consequences," the CBO warns. "Among its other effects, it would slow economic growth, drive up interest payments to foreign holders of U.S. debt, heighten the risk of a fiscal crisis, increase the likelihood of other adverse outcomes, and make the nation's fiscal position more vulnerable to an increase in interest rates."
Higher interest rates are already having a significant effect on the federal budget. This year, payments on the existing debt will total an estimated $870 billion, which is more than the Pentagon's budget. Debt payments have jumped by 32 percent since 2023, thanks to higher interest rates and a larger pile of debt.
The new CBO report shows that debt payments will be one of the fastest-growing parts of the budget for the foreseeable future, along with the twin old-age entitlement programs of Social Security and Medicare. By 2051, interest payments will be the single largest line item in the federal budget.
If there's a sliver of good news to be found in the new CBO projections, it is that the situation looks slightly less dire than it did last year. That improvement is due to higher expected levels of immigration and stronger estimates of future economic growth—not because of anything that policy makers in Washington have done. (If anything, they seem determined to prevent those improvements from coming to pass, whether by limiting immigration or regulating the economy more strictly.)
We should also keep in mind the usual caveats here: The CBO does not account for the possibility of recessions, natural disasters, wars, or other unpredictable events that could cause the federal government to borrow more heavily than current law expects. The past 30 years have included 9/11, the war on terror, the Great Recession, and the COVID-19 pandemic, so it seems pretty likely that the next three decades will include at least a few emergencies that drive deficits higher.
"There is no way to look at these eye-popping numbers without realizing we need to make a change," Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, which advocates for lower deficits, said in a statement about the CBO report. "And yet we have lawmakers promising what they won't do: I won't raise taxes, I won't fix Social Security, I won't pay for all the things I do want to do. And so we continue on this dangerous path."
Indeed, on Thursday, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R–La.) told reporters that he supports plans for a so-called "fiscal commission"—which could propose some solutions to Congress' budgeting problems—but only if the agency could not suggest tax increases or cuts to entitlement programs.
That approach guarantees that the federal government will have to continue borrowing heavily to make ends meet. Despite the Senate's declaration that the national debt is a national security risk and the CBO's attempts to sound the alarm about the federal government's fiscal trajectory, there's still a major shortage of elected officials who want to take the problem seriously.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"We have more than doubled our national debt in just ten years," said Sen. Mike Braun (R–Ind.), who sponsored the resolution.
Been doing that since the 80s bub, regardless of the party in power. Where have you been?
But Boehm, you voted for this!
Remember how you said in 2020 that you weren’t going to vote, but that if you thought it might make a difference, you MIGHT vote for Biden? That is heresy and wrongthink, and that means you are no different than a Biden cultist who enthusiastically supports Team Blue.
Therefore, because you thought about maybe possibly voting for Biden, that is the same as actually voting for Biden and supporting all of his policies and therefore you deserve it.
To be fair, Trump's Deranged Supporters defend everything the man says or does, so they're not expecting Biden voters to do anything they don't do. Only problem is that most who chose Biden were actually voting against Trump, while most who chose Trump were voting for Trump. So there's no Biden cult.
You amd the morbidly obese pedophile have gotten pretty close.
It must be love. And all you’ve got since Jesse won’t return your affections.
You Trump Cultists won't let anyone else interrupt your circle-jerk.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Sevo gets to mop up after each Trump-Cult circle jerk.
His posts are what's called wizdumb around here.
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS addled lying pile of lefty shit, who is too stupid to provide an insult that isn't embarrassing to HIM!
Eat shit and die, turd.
Toss the seal a squirrel, it's bark's gone rabid
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1WildSHrUI
Now that's some Grade A projection right there.
Hey, it’s the other pedophile jumping in to white knight for his morbidly obese Pedo counterpart! Are you two trading child rape videos yet?
And you even got Drunky to pal around with you.
No one fixates on Trump here more than you, sarc. That's your entire agenda. You think you're a brave lone voice in wilderness or something.
To borrow your logic on Bernie Sanders - why should I care about Trump, when he's a guy who can only be president for 8 years? The left is in charge of virtually every major institution and is arguably more bigoted than any Proud Boys.
I don't need to disavow Trump's more questionable comments and decisions to rail on the left's lunacy, in a a show of "principle" or being consistent. Trump is a blowhard. The left chants for the deaths of cops and Jews.
Chuck Schumer imitating the Emperor's voice -
"Everything is happening exactly as I foretold"
The National Debt Is a National Security Issue
Well, yeah, but TikTok and HUNTER BIDENS PENIS! are more important in DC.
Comer Keeps Stepping In It as Impeachment Witness Dishes Dirt on Giuliani
.
Lev Parnas called the MAGA universe a “cult.”
.
But on Wednesday, Parnas said, “The only information ever pushed on the Bidens and Ukraine has come from one source and one source only: Russia and Russian agents.”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/comer-keeps-stepping-in-it-as-impeachment-witness-dishes-dirt-on-giuliani
Pro-Soviet MAGA team now a laughing stock for fake impeachment hearing.
Haha you aren't too bright there. You really haven't followed the witness statements. Maybe you should take your talking points from the White house.
But hey someone should inform Trump that RICO isn't a crime. That's what AOC is saying.
You do have to love Biden and lifetime long government democrats. Somehow, they are millionaires. How does that work huh?
Not to defend AOC but she said RICO is a "category" of crime and she is right for once. Bobo-Dickhead couldn't name an underlying crime. The hearing unraveled and became a farce.
#Still my favorite big-booty Latina
Yep, it's not a crime.
If you think AOC is a big-booty Latina, I have to question your knowledge of Latinas.
If you think AOC is a big-booty Latina
I'm quoting a famous tweet that someone showed to her. But I do think she is hot.
AOC Shares Video of Far-Right Twitter Troll Calling Her ‘Big Booty Latina’ Who ‘Wants to Kill Babies’
https://www.mediaite.com/news/aoc-shares-video-of-far-right-twitter-troll-calling-her-big-booty-latina-who-wants-to-kill-babies/
(I approve of this message)
turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
No she’s not. You’re a pedohile. I doubt you could get it up for any post pubescent female.
The US government used Russian disinformation to help secure a warrant in a top secret court against an American citizen. Using disinformation for political consumption pales in comparison.
turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
But seriously I don't know what it will take to get the spending under control. I really don't like the idea of "total economic collapse" being the only thing that could do it.
Part of the problem is that we Americans tend to view the country as a whole as a "rich country" that can "afford" all of this spending. But the country is not "rich" if the liabilities far exceed the income. That is "broke" instead.
Also part of the problem is that Americans as a whole tend not to be fiscally prudent in their own lives.
"We have more than doubled our national debt in just ten years," said Sen. Mike Braun (R–Ind.), who sponsored the resolution.
That is true, but it also tracks with total HOUSEHOLD debt approximately doubling over the last ten years.
https://www.newyorkfed.org/microeconomics/hhdc
We get the government that is just as fiscally imprudent as we collectively are.
Getting rid of you and your fellow travelers would do a lot.
You Nazi faithful do love to kill "others".
The TDS-addled shit-pile turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
No, you faggot democrats are the fascists, pretty much all your policies and authoritarianism are textbook fascist. So stop projecting. No one buys your bullshit.
But you won’t. As you are incredibly stupid. Probably why you posted kiddie porn links here.
We should just forgive each other’s debts! Problem solved!
Or just put Hunter Biden in jail where he belongs!
See, the whole anti-CRT anti-gay crap that Team Red is pushing in schools is really about getting rid of the debt. Because when kids aren't indoctrinated to think about slavery being bad or that gays being normal, then they will turn into "real Americans" who value fiscal responsibility, and then they will balance the budget. Problem solved!
People ask me why I hate conservatives so much.
It's because they engage in nothing but culture wars.
(Progressives suck too)
turd lies. The TDS-addled turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
Yeah, you do t,oke it when you can’t groom little kids, right Fatfuck?
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit.
But seriously I don’t know what it will take to get the spending under control. I really don’t like the idea of “total economic collapse” being the only thing that could do it.
Politicians care about one and only one thing, and that is getting elected (or reelected). That means they look forward no further than the end of their term. If they promise free stuff, they get elected and stay elected. If they even whisper about cuts that would mean people losing their job or their transfer payment, then their political career is over. Gone like a fart in the wind. So there’s no incentive to do anything about the debt and deficit. Quite the opposite.
So yeah, nothing will change until investors stop buying bonds. Then shit’s gonna get real messy.
How about have the 2024 budget match the projected revenue, unlike Biden's 7.3 trillion dollar budget that Jeff and Sarc love.
Than freeze the budget for 10 years and let growth start handling it.
I can hear Jeff, Sarc and the rest of the democrats - "that's end of the world! People will all die!" I mean that is what they said that on a 3% increase
They will also scream for open borders. Because tens of millions of illiterate indigents who likely speak little English will be a boon to the US economy, somehow.
Wow, you're so naive you believe that either party cares about runaway deficits?
The GOP House is fixated on HUNTER BIDENS PENIS, you know. Don't you?
The Senate is no better.
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Time for your Droxy, Sevo. Take a double dose this time.
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
And turd is stupid enough to imagine that a reference to "Droxy" is somehow clever; he is a stupid pile of shit, ain't he?
You mean the GOP RINO senators that go along with your democrat masters frequently? Yeah, no shit.
unlike Biden’s 7.3 trillion dollar budget that Jeff and Sarc love.
lol, right
What part of the budget would you cut?
The Department of Education, the Commerce Department, the EPA, no more to the Ukraine, no more pork, no more foreign aid, start a national sales tax as we eliminate the income tax and then eliminate 90% of the IRS, and a host of others.
But where I what I would like is transparency where every penny goes to every agency. That would put a giant weed up the GOP and the democrats' asses.
Social Security and Medicare are the biggest items contributing to deficit and debt. Without addressing those two things you might as well be pissing into the wind.
But SS has auto-cuts built into it when the surplus is depleted.
The TDS-addled ass clown turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Total budget for Department of Education: $84 billion
Total budget for Department of Commerce: $111 billion
Total budget for EPA: $79 billion
Total amount spent on Ukraine: $75 billion
Total amount spent on foreign aid: $61 billion
Total of these amounts is $410 billion.
Total US government spending is about $6 trillion.
So what you have proposed is roughly 7% of the overall budget. It does not even cover the annual deficit.
Sarc is right, going after these programs is small potatoes. Real spending cuts must include serious entitlement reform.
It’s like a household going from a dual to single income and trying to balance the budget by rolling their own cigarettes and making their own coffee.
When what they really need to do is downsize their home and unload that car with the big monthly payment. Maybe say goodbye to the pets. Buy chicken instead of steak.
Make government do what we've been doing for the last four years.
You heard it here first, folks: every little bit doesn't count.
Saving pennies when Benjamins matter is foolish.
Look at me! I just put a 0.00004% dent in the problem!
I mean, I know why people like you and One-Punch_Man immediately go to "cut the EPA/Dept of Ed/IRS" in order to cut spending. Because those are agencies that Team Red particularly don't like. But it is not a serious attempt to tackle the problem of the debt. Just like when Team Blue immediately say "cut the Department of Defense and raise taxes on the rich". That is just their team preference, but it is not a serious answer. It is just performance.
A serious answer would have to include doing something real about entitlements.
Lol. Chemjeff selectively nuanced defeatist shilling for big government again.
Where did I shill for anything? I'm just not letting you and your team get away with just chanting "Cut the Department of Education!" and think that you have scored some big victory against the debt. You haven't. It is not a serious answer, it is just a performative gesture for your base. Your team is afraid to tackle the entitlement problem, so you try to fool the moron voters in your team by thinking that cutting some tiny department is some huge victory.
“Total amount spent on foreign aid: $61 billion.”
They gave Ukraine that in just the most recent giveaway.
They rely on gullible morons like you to enable them so they never have to worry about how much they spend.
God you all are so dishonest. I even gave you the figure for Ukraine spending above. OBVIOUSLY the $61 billion does not include the separate $75 billion for Ukraine. Do you really think that a reader would not understand this? What did you think you were trying to prove with your idiotic pedantic comment? I'm not a moron, I understand 61 is less than 75. Oh but wait, I guess you were the moron who was confused. Maybe next time I will use crayons so you can understand.
And change the budget mandates from ‘shall spend’ to ‘may spend’.
If I was king I'd freeze the federal budget, as solid as the rocks between your ears. They could move money around and prioritize, but the total budget cannot increase. After a period of years inflation would eliminate the deficit and balance the budget. Then with no deficit, the debt itself could be addressed.
But don't let what I actually say interfere with the narrative in your head.
not a bad idea
sarcasmic: What do you do about programs passed by Congress that have mandatory increases? Can't freeze that.
Then what?
Agree a spending freeze sounds great....until you look at the surrounding detail.
What do you do about programs passed by Congress that have mandatory increases?
I would imagine that freezing the budget would include ending mandatory increases.
Realistically though it can never happen, because people on fixed incomes vote. That's why I'd have to be king to accomplish it.
Freeze all spending levels, including SS and Medicare? So how would you go about doing that?
My Facebook feed is starting to get filled with lefties whining about the rich needing taxed again. I guess Mark is letting politics back on. I'm sure Act Blue is pounding their emails hard again letting them know that Bezos and Musk are the ones keeping our budget from balancing.
I recommend just increase taxes on the wealthy lefties like Oprah, Obama, Biden, Al Gore, Rob Reiner, Babs Streisand, Whoopie Goldberg, Michael Moore, etc.
Since they say they believe in the redistribution of wealth, I recommend the IRS take 90% of their income.
Then we can all enjoy the shit show they'll provide for us about "unfair taxes."
The irony of people who accuse other people of being greedy failing to understand that wanting 90% is greedy in and of itself.
Greed is a word that’s used by people who want property that does not belong to them. It’s never used to describe takers. No, it’s reserved for people who object to their property being taken away from them.
When was the last time you heard someone say "Look at that greedy fucker who wants to take stuff from other people"?
I'd venture to say never. Never have, never will.
What about someone saying "Look at that greedy fucker who doesn't want to give back to the community or pay his fair share"?
I'd venture to say often. Quite often. Past, present, and future.
""When was the last time you heard someone say “Look at that greedy fucker who wants to take stuff from other people”?""
Isn't that the position of left regarding billionaires? Was it AOC who said Amazon doesn't make a Billion, it takes a Billion?
""What about someone saying “Look at that greedy fucker who doesn’t want to give back to the community or pay his fair share”?""
The ones I hear talk about fair share often are the ones throwing the 90% around. That's my point, they claim the guy is being greedy for wanting to keep what he has. But their concept of greed does not acknowledge wanting to take 90% is also a form of greed. But naturally they will not admit that.
If you are an actor and I am a booking agent and I demand 90% of what you make, you would call me greedy. Rightly so.
Was it AOC who said Amazon doesn’t make a Billion, it takes a Billion?
Now we're getting into a whole different subject where commies see profit as theft blah blah blah. Doesn't refute my point.
they claim the guy is being greedy for wanting to keep what he has. But their concept of greed does not acknowledge wanting to take 90% is also a form of greed.
Yeah! That's what I fucking said! We're in violent agreement!
Democrats h should have to pay reparations for everything they’ve done.
To REALLY raise money from the rich, confiscate the democrat campaign chests, and the endowments of the ivy league.
(let the wailing and gnashing of teeth begin)
Our 401k's are bigger and better sources. According to them. How dare people be allowed to gather wealth and prepare for the future.
"The growing debt will "slow economic growth, drive up interest payments," and "heighten the risk of a fiscal crisis," the CBO warns."
In other news, scientists have discovered cancer can be lethal.
Buckle up they're gonna double the debt in under 10 years.
Five years if the democrats get their way.
Droolin' Joe says: "Whaaa?".
'The Senate unanimously approved a resolution on Wednesday calling the debt "a threat to the national security of the United States" and calling expected future budget deficits "unsustainable, irresponsible, and dangerous."'
Unanimous, eh? How unanimous were the follow up statements? I suspect we had more perfect party line support for "Therefore, we need to triple income taxes and impose wealth taxes on those greedy rich people" and for "Can't we talk about pretending to cut spending?"
Republicans trying to tackle SS, Medicare. These guys are committing political suicide. Fixed income seniors vote and their millennial kids, who don’t want Mom and Pops living with them, vote.
We’re pre-Meili Argentina and there’s nothing anyone can do about it.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-03-20/republicans-call-for-retirement-age-hike-in-clash-with-biden
Thanks for the Ponzi scheme FDR!
The Senate unanimously approved a resolution on Wednesday calling the debt "a threat to the national security of the United States" and calling expected future budget deficits "unsustainable, irresponsible, and dangerous."
They then congratulated themselves on the successful outcome of their bipartisan hard work.
CBO has repeatedly warned that Biden lies.
Remember Biden's Build Back Better estimate?
This is November 2021
The Congressional Budget Office said Thursday that President Joe Biden's $1.75 trillion domestic spending package would increase the federal deficit by about $160 billion over a decade
Biden on crime and everything else is an opium dream
Remember the riots and him doing NOTHING
Yet Joe Biden in a 1993 speech warned of “predators on our streets” who were “beyond the pale” and said they must be cordoned off from the rest of society
A revolution and a lot of ruthless action to exterminate the left will become necessary very soon.
A Senate Resolution and $32.45 will get you a cup of coffee delivered to you by Uber Eats in Seattle. I would be interested to hear that the Senate refused to pass any spending bill from the House that approved spending by the Federal government over the amount of revenues collected. Until then, don't bother me!
Why would anybody think that ordering a coffee to be delivered makes economic sense for ordinary humans? How much should a human earn by taking at least 20-30 minutes of their time to pick up your (probably already) overpriced coffee & deliver it to you?
There really is a homeless industrial complex that has added the migrant contractors grift to the racket. A Denver “Newcomers Response” taxpayer funded salary is $175,000. The Democrat magic money tree givith.
https://denvergazette.com/news/denver-head-of-immigration-response-sarah-plastino/article_babb368c-e6f9-11ee-973d-e7a5af48bdd0.html
Here's a simple fact to help the decision process. Wikipedia has a nice entry for "U.S. economic performance by presidential party."
I suggest voting for the party that has produced the better economic results. Those results track similarly to each party's contribution to the deficit & the debt
In nominal dollars, since World War II, just over 60% of the growth in the debt took place under Republican presidents, and about 40% under Democratic presidents. Each party has controlled the presidency for 40 years of the last 80. The numbers speak for themselves.
Let me just add, regarding economic performance under Republican vs Democrat presidents. Reagan began the pre-occupation with supply side economics. While the economy's performance during the Reagan years was fairly decent (highest performing for a GOP administration since WWII & 4th highest overall in the 80 year period), GOP presidents since Reagan scored the 2 lowest & 3 of the 5 lowest performing administrations over the 80 year period. The other 2 of the 5 were the Ford administration (4th worst) & the Obama administration (3rd worst). Please keep in mind that Obama took office during the worst recession since the Great Depression & if you drop the first year of his administration, the performance rises to 2.2%, coming even with Bush Sr.
The evidence seems quite clear that demand side economics outperforms supply side economics for growth.
The evidence seems quite clear that demand side economics outperforms supply side economics for growth.
Please clarify which party is in fact advocating demand side economics as a primary plank of its economic platform, because as far as I can tell, spending money it doesn't have on shit it doesn't need pretending to help people it doesn't care about is about as much work as our present government is currently willing to do.
I suggest voting for the party that has produced the better economic results.
Whether you love Trump or hate him, his economy was better than Biden's by just about every metric that matters to anyone who works for a living, and it's not even close. So, unless you're simply an innumerate moron who thinks $1,000,000,000,000 every 100 days is no big deal, the choice is pretty clear, and it sure as fuck isn't the democrats. Now fuck off.
Or, we could not vote for either party which got us into this mess in the first place.
And maybe stop defending the authoritarian Marxist party that is pushing a $7.3 trillion budget.
"If there's a sliver of good news to be found in the new CBO projections, it is that the situation looks slightly less dire than it did last year. That improvement is due to higher expected levels of immigration and stronger estimates of future economic growth—not because of anything that policy makers in Washington have done. (If anything, they seem determined to prevent those improvements from coming to pass, whether by limiting immigration or regulating the economy more strictly.)"
Boehm has passed from reluctantly and strategically to arrogantly and stupidly.
What Reason pothead came up with the idea that more immigration will be a boon to the economy? Manufacturing has moved to China. There are no decent jobs for the people coming in. There's no place to house them. Hospitals are going broke treating them. They're living off the taxpayers dime. Politicians are scheming to raise even more money to take care of them.
National debt is a national security concern. So is our unmanaged borders, which is arguably a more pressing national security threat.