Nathan Wade Resigns From Trump Prosecution in Georgia
Neither Wade's letter of resignation, nor District Attorney Fani Willis' letter accepting his resignation, grapple with what a complete unforced error their relationship was.

On Friday afternoon, Georgia attorney Nathan Wade resigned from the Fulton County district attorney's prosecution of former President Donald Trump for attempts to change the 2020 election results. Wade was the lead attorney on the case, but his relationship with District Attorney Fani Willis drew unwanted attention to the prosecution.
The allegations first became public in January, when one of Trump's co-defendants filed a motion in the case alleging that Willis and Wade had been romantically involved. The motion claimed a conflict of interest and asked that Willis and her office both be disqualified.
Wade was hired in November 2021, and over the next two-plus years he was paid over $720,000 by the Fulton County District Attorney's Office—considerably more than either of the other attorneys hired for the case. Wade received this lucrative offer despite having no apparent experience in felony jury trials, much less one as complex as prosecuting a former president with racketeering.
In trying to get Willis disqualified, defendants claimed that Wade took her on lavish vacations and gave her expensive gifts during their relationship, giving Willis an incentive to keep the investigation going—and keep Wade employed—so she could continue to benefit from his paychecks. Wade and Willis claimed under oath that they split the cost of their trips, with Willis often paying him back in cash.
In a ruling issued Friday morning, Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee split the difference. While he found that "Defendants failed to meet their burden of proving that theDistrict Attorney acquired an actual conflict of interest in this case," he also determined that "the prosecution of this case cannot proceed until the State selects one of two options. The District Attorney may choose to step aside, along with the whole of her office," or else "Wade can withdraw."
On Friday afternoon, Wade opted for the latter, tendering his resignation in a one-page memo addressed to Willis.
"The furtherance of the rule of law and democracy is and has always been the North Star of our combined efforts in the prosecution of those who are alleged to have attempted to overthrow the results of Georgia's 2020 presidential election," Wade wrote. "I am offering my resignation in the interest of democracy, in dedication to the American public, and to move this case forward as quickly as possible. I am proud of the work our team has accomplished in investigating, indicting, and litigating this case."
Willis soon replied with a brief of her own, accepting Wade's resignation and speaking of his tenure in glowing terms.
"I compliment you for the professionalism and dignity you have shown over the last 865 days, as you have endured threats against you and your family, as well as unjustified attacks in the media and in court on your reputation as a lawyer," Willis wrote. She calls him "an outstanding advocate" and expresses her "sincere gratitude on behalf of the citizens of Fulton County Georgia for your patriotism, courage, and dedication to justice."
Not present in either Willis' or Wade's memos was any realization of the inappropriate nature of their relationship and how it may well have tainted their case, which had been considered the strongest of any of the prosecutions against Trump. Instead, Willis engaged in an inappropriate relationship with a subordinate that would be frowned upon in nearly any workplace in America, much less one that has the power to wield criminal charges.
"If this case were in federal court, disqualification would be a no brainer—federal prosecutors are not allowed to participate in cases where someone with whom they have a close personal relationship has a substantial financial interest," Atlanta attorney Andrew Fleishman wrote at The Hill. "In other words, they can't hire a spouse or boyfriend to be a special prosecutor."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
These people have no shame.
Worse, they're proud of what they've done.
At least they weren’t brother and sister.
Nathan Wade should have gotten it on with Spermy Daniels (Who Art Our Queen, Drenched in Vaseline) instead, and THEN he'd be given a free pass! Also, he SHOULD have gotten Sidney Powell to LIE in court for him! He FAILED miserably here and hair on BOTH cunts, so I have ZERO sympathy for him! HE DIDN'T EVEN LEAVE VIDEO FOR US TO WATCH!!! Twat a miserable excuse for a PORN STAR when ye need one!!!
(THAT is why and where-hair we need The Donald!!! CUM to us and our cameras, Dear Leader!!!)
Did you fap to Daniels or something? Is that why you're obsessed?
Want to hear the best part? Judge McCafee used to be employed by fani and even donated to her campaign.
If it wasn't for all the corruption they wouldn't have laid the crazy charges. Ethical prosecutors and judges don't do what they're doing.
Professionalism and diginity? The guy perjured himself and so did you. The strongest case Joe? Everyone agrees this case is as thin as tissue paper. RICO is for mobsters not Presidents looking for election fraud.
Did the judge mention or otherwise address the perjury that was committed?
Nope. But there's a strong possibility that the GA AG will appoint a special prosecutor to investigate that.
I'm not betting money on that.
He did not. He also reduced detailed witness testimony to one line in the judgement calling it unspecified despite dates and incidents testified to.
He talked about it, but decided that by itself it wasn't enough to disqualify both Willis and Wade. The main thing they were lying about (and the main problem in his view) was their relationship, so his fix was allowing only one of them to remain on the case.
He said that there was an "odor of mendacity" about the testimony (a line from Cat on a Hot Tin Roof), and "reasonable questions about whether the District Attorney and her hand-selected lead SADA testified untruthfully about the timing of their relationship further underpin the finding of an appearance of impropriety and the need to make proportional efforts to cure it."
There may be a bar or other disciplinary action in their future, but the results of those are almost always underwhelming.
Did the Jim Logjam mention, define, demonstrate, give a link or a citation for, or otherwise address the perjury that was committed? Or did Jim Logjam just throw out some shit and see if shit would stick, with fellow travelers of the One True Tribe?
Maybe Jim Logjam should call Sidney Powell into the case!!!
I know that Sidney Powell’s and Spermy Daniels’s demands sound kinda horribly HARD-assed, butt, hear me OUT now! A hard bargain is hard to swallow, butt Sidney Powell and Spermy Daniels (along with Trump, we trust) are gonna get UP to the challenges!!! Sidney Powell and Spermy Daniels, just like Donna Rice on Gary Hart on the “Monkey Business”, will GET DOWN on the Challenger! (Trump will challenge Biden, again, even though Trump REALLY won the erections that were STOLEN from Him!!!)
Anyway…
“What do Donna Rice and Christa McAuliffe have in common? They both went down on the Challenger.” … Now add to that, Sidney Powell and Spermy Daniels ass well!!! Maybe add Mammary-Fuhrer, AKA Mother’s Lament, with a Head Full of Cement, Ass well!
http://home.iscte-iul.pt/~fgvs/Dundes,%20six%20inches.pdf
"When Hart was asked by reporters, 'Did you commit adultery'? his answer was: 'Do blow-jobs count?'" Another common joke was "What do Gary Hart and the entire population of China have in common? They were all eating rice last Saturday night (last week)." "Do you know what 'Hart' stands for? Had any rice today?" "Have you heard about the Gary Hart diet? You eat rice three times a day and lose everything."
Sidney Powell was right. Those machines were as honest as the ones outside Vegas truck stop bathrooms.
Having parked at a number of Nevada truck stops, they're actually one of few places in that state that don't have slot machines everywhere. At least when it's a Pilot or Flying J.
The judge didn't allow any of the evidence directly showing they perjured themselves to be presented during the hearing and he knows it. Which means the entire "there was no direct evidence of perjury" rigamarole was a carefully manufactured fig leaf he could hang the decision on and the fix was in from the start.
What I like is that Fani is demonstrably more guilty of the RICO violations she is going after Trump for.
Any reasonable person knew that Donald Trump would turn his criminal trials into circuses. He didn’t need the prosecution to provide him with the clowns.
You seriously mean to tell me that the state of Georgia could not come up with anybody better than these morons to prosecute a case against a former president? This case really is about “saving democracy”, then democracy is in big, big trouble.
Nothing says "saving democracy" like prosecuting political enemies while scamming the taxpayer.
They have to save democracy from people who might vote for the wrong candidate.
The primary charges were so ridiculous even this judge already tossed them. The claim being that Trump and his codefendants petitioned government officials to commit a felony. You know like trying to remove a candidate from ballots. Oh wait.
Don't forget the supposed breach making this illegal was The Constitutions of the US and Georgia. Not any particular part of them, just their entireties.
Here at the Harvard Legal Review, we call that the "constitutional vibe" defense.
By turning it into a circus you mean demanding the same standard any other defendant is allowed? The same challenges etc? I hear this from the left, delay, delay, delay, except his lawyers are filing the same appeals any competent lawyer would file. In fact, the only reason to rush the cases is for purely political reasons. The whole 'Trump is trying to drag this out until after the elections uhmm bad.' is pure 100% bullshit. No, the rush to get a case (none were filed before summer of last year, so a year of pre-motion hearings are absolutely consistent with an average court case that isn't being rushed before an arbitrary deadline, e.g. the election) done before the election is a complete mockery of our judicial system. It's pure Banana Republic bullshit.
What I mean is that he would try the case in the court of public opinion, relying on the Russiagate debacle to claim that he was being targeted politically, regardless of the merits, or lack of merits of the allegations against him. And with enemies like those morons in Georgia, he doesn’t need friends.
The federal case is not any better (why is Trump being punished when literally nobody in history ever has been before?) and the NY case is even weaker than that. The case he LOST was a pathetic joke.
Seems what you really mean is that you are a TDS-addled steaming pile of shit.
"...You seriously mean to tell me that the state of Georgia could not come up with anybody better than these morons to prosecute a case against a former president?..."
No one with a scintilla of honesty was going to pursue such flimsy charges. Have no idea if it is true, but the claim is there were hopes they could get some bottom-feeder to somehow put Trump behind bars before the election and thereby raise issues about seating a jailed POTUS candidate.
Dunno, but by now what was formerly in the "are you kidding?!" bucket has become "well, could well be". Trump broke a shit-load of swamp-dwellers.
And it seems the only way to do that was to employ Willis. And hope no one noticed.
This was a HUGE mistake as now any citizen in GA can sue the hell out of him on behalf of the State.
Instead, Willis should have recused herself from the prosecution. Now the PEOPLE have actual harm committed and a financial gain that was disproportionate to the background and ability of this shyster.
"Neither Wade's letter of resignation, nor District Attorney Fani Willis' letter accepting his resignation, grapple with what a complete unforced error their relationship was."
"Unforced error" my ass! The entire point of this dog and pony show was to benefit Fani! She gets the TDS crowd shouting "yas queen slay" and her boy toy can now take her on vacation at the taxpayers' dime!
She should have been thrown off this case minimum!
"their case, which had been considered the strongest of any of the prosecutions against Trump." Really? Citing the NYT? This is yet another novel application of a vaguely constructed statute designed not to uphold any rule of law but to prosecute political enemies of the regime. How do we know? Because Fani told us exactly that when she ran for office. Can't wait for the May issue of Reason wherein Joe Lancaster explains the libertarian case for banana republic political prosecutions.
This claim here continues to be very strange at a libertarian magazine when the transcript of the call is already public. On top of that the call was recorded in Florida, a 2 party consent state so even that evidence is poisoned fruit. Yet reason is silent.
Speaks rather loudly that the only criminal justice reform Reason cares about is lawfare against conservatives and US citizens.
Why would a publication that supports a Nazi collaborator do that?
That was a bit weird. Whenever I've seen the cases ranked it's the documents case at the top, but maybe the Hur report undermined that?
The RICO part of this was always a stretch and dismissal of some of the underlying charges makes it even stretchier.
Judge in the documents case taking a hard look at arbitrary enforcement.
https://revolver.news/2024/03/special-counsel-jack-smith-documents-case-going-down-in-flames-judge-cannon/
Robert Hur report and testimony is the biggest elephant in the room. The term “arbitrary enforcement” used frequently by both the defense and Judge Aileen Cannon.
Cannon hammered the fact no former president or vice president has been charged under Espionage Act for taking and keeping classified records including national defense information–which represents 32 counts against Trump in Jack Smith’s indictment.
Prediction: Cannon won’t dismiss the case based on the motions debated today–vagueness of Espionage Act and protection under the Presidential Records Act.
But it’s very likely she will dismiss the case based on selective prosecution, a motion still pending before her.
Cannon hammered the fact no former president or vice president has been charged under Espionage Act for taking and keeping classified records including national defense information–which represents 32 counts against Trump in Jack Smith’s indictment.
.
“Given the constellation of what happened before”–meaning no criminal prosecution of former presidents including Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan and vice presidents–Cannon suggested Trump could have reasonably expected he was in the clear.
Someone tell Sullum.
Mens Rea. The judge has been overruled by the circuit court before in this case. But if she dismisses the charges for arbitrary enforcement it will end up in the Supreme court. It could take years but this case will go down. Hopefully Jack "8-0" will become Jack "9-0".
It can't be men's rea as the judge pointed out in the case. Jack Smiths own team argued that willful retention occurred on Jan 20th when he exoted the white house. That would make each of her asked examples guilty as well.
Wonder what date Jack would set for Biden before 2021 considering the fact that he never had declassification authority. Turley is claiming that Hur basically smoked the illegal retention of documents case but that Smith can still prosecute obstruction. But how do you obstruct a case without a crime?
By being Donald Trump. He's guilty! Everyone knows he's guilty! We just have to find the crime!
Fani likely getting investigated for fraudulent prosecution and or misappropriation of tax payer funds. Judge likely to throw out the classified documents case. The USSC likely to throw out the underlying charge (the blocking of an official investigation) charges against Trump (and most of the January 6th defendants) and the defense getting a huge dump of documents they say will exonerate Trump (the files from the Feds investigation in the so called hush money case) in New York. Trump ahead in the polls with no post state of the union bump. What is the over and under that some proggie is going to try and whack him now? Everything else seems to be failing.
With all of the lawfare against him Trump is probably suicidal. The regime will conduct a thorough and reach the conclusion that inexplicably all of the cameras were mysteriously disabled.
Thorough investigation.
*can't edit anymore. I guess I'm treading on thin ice.
Have you paid your yearly commenter’s tax?
(Only slight sarcasm here.)
This is an edit to test.
I’m still grandfathered bitches! Nah. Still waiting for KMW to bring the hammer down. Haven’t decided if I’ll stick around. Been fun and educational reading the comments but the articles are rarely enlightening. @edit.
This is where I'm at as well... I frequently recommend reason to the tiny group I really talk to - mostly because of the comments section BUT I do warn them that it is a very frequently vulgar and hostile place, so be prepared. Also tell them there is excellent background and commentary\analysis to be found in the comments section.
Also a good place to grow one's vocabulary!
I don't like the idea of giving any financial support to the content they put out. It's also hard to believe that the comments will be as valuable once they paywall it. Pretty sure I'm done here once they paywall. I used to read Dailywire until they locked some articles and eliminated their comments (though maybe comments do show up if you're logged in as a member)
At a time where engagement is money for media outlets it is baffling that so many decide to nuke it.
I’m going to laugh my ass off if Willis ends up in prison from this.
Shit the edit worked.
I sometimes get logged out after a post and then try to edit and can't figure out what is happening. Until I refresh the page I dont see im logged out.
Wade and Willis claimed under oath that they split the cost of their trips, with Willis often paying him back in cash.
Did Fani hand over any of that cash to Wade’s wife?
Apparently not:
https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-fani-willis-nathan-wade-atlanta-georgia-fulton-county-scott-mcafee-ethics-bar-1879705
“Since that time, D.A. Willis admitted to an improper relationship with Mr. Wade, so Ms. Wade had every reason to determine how the marital money was being used before the divorce. This was not an unusual action by a divorcing couple.”
I hope all these clowns end up on Divorce Court, ATL Edition
Judge Steve Harvey, presiding.
I'm assuming that Fani doesn't grasp the concept of "per capita".
There was no damage to the case itself. No case is about the lawyers — their self-importance notwithstanding. Rather, criminal cases are about the defendants themselves. All the damning evidence against these defendants are still there. Even against those who managed not to be charged — yet fear they might be.
Damning evidence of, uh, talking about something, right TDS-addled shit-pile?
"...Not present in either Willis' or Wade's memos was any realization of the inappropriate nature of their relationship and how it may well have tainted their case, which had been considered the strongest of any of the prosecutions against Trump..."
So, according to the steaming pile of TDS-addled shit Lancaster, the worst outcome is the demolition of one more lame attempt to GET TRUMP!!!!!
Stuf it up your ass, scumbag.
"Even after considering the proffered cellphone testimony from Defendant Trump, along with the entirety of the other evidence, neither side was able to conclusively establish by a preponderance of the evidence when the relationship evolved into a romantic one. However, an odor of mendacity remains. "
There were over 2000 telephone calls plus another 12,000 text messages between Willis and Wade in 2021, and cell phone data placing Wade at Willis's home, but it is a toss up according to the judge.
https://www.atlantanewsfirst.com/2024/02/23/2000-calls-12000-texts-alleged-between-da-fani-willis-special-prosecutor/
Maybe “romantic” is a euphemism for you-know-what, and the judge couldn’t decide from the evidence the precise date when they first did the nasty, made the beast with two backs, rolled in the hay, knew each other in the Biblical sense, f&^%ed each others’ brains out (to the extent this is possible with them), did the horizontal bop…you know, engaged in intimacy.
“Defendants failed to meet their burden of proving that the District Attorney acquired an actual conflict of interest in this case”
Of course this is ridiculous on the face of it, but even if it were true, the subsequent ruling that the prosecution could not continue while both suspects continued to participate – because of the conflict of interest that he just said that the District Attorney did not acquire! – egregiously contradicts the first statement in a way that seriously undermines our confidence in the impartiality of the judge! Either the defense failed to prove the conflict of interest and both attorneys could continue on, or there was a conflict of interest forcing one of them to drop out.
Either way, one or both of them are guilty of corruption, kickbacks and fraud and should be prosecuted under the very clear laws that prohibit such behavior by officials. "Splitting the difference" is not something that judges in a major criminal case should routinely - or ever - engage in!