Apple Abandons Plans for Driverless Electric Car, Shifts Team to AI
While a disappointment to green-tech supporters, Apple's decision reflects the growing uncertainty in the E.V. market.

On Tuesday, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman reported that tech giant Apple, famous for its consumer electronics like MacBooks and iPhones, had canceled its long-gestating plans to build a self-driving electric vehicle (E.V.). Gurman further reported that many of the 2,000 employees working on the car project "will be shifted to the artificial intelligence division" to "focus on generative AI projects, an increasingly key priority for the company."
Plans for an official Apple E.V.—codenamed "Titan"—date back a decade, though an Apple board member said in 2014 that company founder Steve Jobs, inspired by what Tesla Motors was doing at the time, "was gonna design an iCar" before his death in 2011. In 2015, Business Insider reported on the existence of an Apple project that a company employee said "will change the landscape and give Tesla a run for its money."
Interestingly, Tesla CEO Elon Musk claims he offered to sell his company to Apple in 2017 but Apple boss Tim Cook "refused to take the meeting." At the time the automaker was struggling to deliver its long-delayed Model 3 sedan—a period Musk has referred to as "production hell." In his 2021 book Power Play: Tesla, Elon Musk, and the Bet of the Century, Tim Higgins of The Wall Street Journal wrote that Musk and Cook actually did discuss terms of an acquisition, but talks broke down when Musk insisted on being made CEO of Apple. Both Musk and Cook deny having ever even spoken. Responding to the news that Apple planned to shutter its E.V. program, Musk tweeted emojis of a salute and a cigarette, later adding, "The natural state of a car company is dead."
The Titan project seems to have languished in the years since: By 2016, the company appeared to pivot from building its own car to designing autonomous self-driving technology that it could license to other automakers. Then by 2020, the project had proceeded well enough that Apple reconsidered: The company planned to start production in 2024 on an E.V. with a battery that would boast lower costs and longer ranges than competitors. Between December 2022 and November 2023, the company logged more than 400,000 miles of autonomous test drives on public roads, according to Wired.
By the beginning of this year, however, the company had reached an impasse. Bloomberg's Gurman wrote in January that Apple was at "a make-or-break point": The company did not expect to introduce a car until at least 2028, and the final product would have "more limited features" than the "truly driverless car" originally envisioned, but Apple still anticipated a price tag of $100,000 or more.
In canceling the E.V. project, Apple is expected to redouble its efforts into generative AI—on an earnings call in January, Cook said "we continue to spend a tremendous amount of time and effort" on artificial intelligence but gave no specifics—as well as products like the Vision Pro virtual reality headset.
While the project's cancellation is bad news for those who support a shift to renewable energy sources, it unfortunately reflects the growing uncertainty in the E.V. market. While the U.S. sold a record number of E.V.s in 2023, the sector's growth is more sluggish than anticipated. As CNN's Peter Valdes-Dapena wrote this week, consumers find prices too high, and public charging stations too unreliable, to make the switch. Even legacy automakers like Ford and G.M. have softened previous pledges to switch their production from gas burners to E.V.s.
In fact, the switch from E.V. to AI is expected to be a financial boon for Apple: Bloomberg Intelligence analysts Anurag Rana and Andrew Girard noted that artificial intelligence seems like the safer bet "given the long-term profitability potential of AI revenue streams versus cars."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
artificial intelligence seems like the safer bet "given the long-term profitability potential of AI revenue streams versus cars."
That profitability potential of AI revenue - at least the centralized form that Big Tech is jerking off to - is about as risky as those EV cars. All that needs to happen to break those AI models is for the content of those models to become AI generated. Then the models collapse.
'Apple Abandons Plans for Driverless Electric Car, Shifts Team to AI'
Not enough anti-racism opportunities in robot cars?
Building a workable car is a lot harder than building a passable phone and handheld computer. For starters, a car can't have its systems crash every 100 miles or so and require a restart/reboot.
Yeah, the “change out the proprietary charger with every other new model” business plan doesn’t exactly mesh well with the industry-wide infrastructure build out problem.
“The frame of your car bending when you sit on it isn’t happening and, if it is, it’s a feature.”
Well, at least Apple will produce lots of photorealistic images of cool driverless cars.
But what will the drivers look like?
will there be a company who programs an AI to find the truth?
AI is the new bright shiny object.
Remember when Bailey was writing that driverless cars were right around the corner and that would make the individual ownership of cars obsolete?
Bailey is consistently wrong about pretty much everything.
The future of EVs isn't "uncertain", it's years (and construction of nukes) away.
What vehicles will be available then is not known now.
And the market isn’t doing so well for EV’s right now.
Apple won't enter a market without a compelling competitive advantage over the existing players. They didn't see a way to get that in the car business, so they tapped out. Good for them for taking the shot, and also for knowing when to let it go.
What I see in the next 20 to 50 years is the replacement of ground cars with air cars for most personal transportation. The air cars will be fully autonomous, powered by hydrogen fuel cells, and switching to them will allow surface roads to be reserved for heavy cargo only except for the occasional bike path.
Larger aircraft will still be around for long-distance travel, but they should also be autonomous for safety. Computers don't get drunk or depressed and decide to commit suicide with a couple hundred innocent people along for the ride.
-jcr
What I see in the next 20 to 50 years is the replacement of ground cars with air cars for most personal transportation. The air cars will be fully autonomous, powered by hydrogen fuel cells, and switching to them will allow surface roads to be reserved for heavy cargo only except for the occasional bike path.
I can't tell if you don't understand how driverless technology has failed, how HFCs work, are going to blow up a lot of people, or all three.
Fuck you, too.
-jcr
LOL.
While a disappointment to
green-tech supportersretards, Apple's decision reflects thegrowing uncertaintyobvious (to everyone except retards) recession if not demise in the E.V. market.The "driverless" aspect of self-driving cars should be squarely in the middle of the AI wheelhouse. Driverless/AI itself, rather obviously to anyone with an elementary grasp of physics, is marginally at best improving efficiency one way or the other.
Given Apples' commitment and abandonment of Driverless AI on the asserted environmentalist grounds, actually generates uncertainty around Apple's own intellect in moving from Driverless AI failure to more Generalized AI (success?)
The way EV sales aren't keeping up with production, manufacturer and dealer lots are going to be filled with an abundance of driverless EV's.
All the attention to the lack of usable charging stations for EV's is apt, but only part of the story. When will we have the hugely-increased electric supply needed to run them? Try on this for a calculation: One horsepower is 740 watts; a watt is the product of voltage and amperage. A car uses a lot of energy, much more than does a house. Where will all of that electric energy come from? As for me, I wouldn't mind having an electric car, if it had a reasonable range, 400 to 500 miles, and could recharge in just twice the time it takes for a fill-up. Say, twenty minutes for 400 miles of driving. When that is possible on every country road, I'd be willing to go electric.
What innovative methods have established themselves in the best way in the analysis of the influence of a changing climate https://dragonflyaerospace.com/understanding-synthetic-aperture-radar/ After receiving reliable information, it is formulated in the strategy of effective use.
https://dragonflyaerospace.com/understanding-synthetic-aperture-radar/
I notice that there is a controversial attitude towards AI in society, and many people really still cannot or do not want to trust AI technologies and various AI tools like Top AI Influencers. After reading more on the site topaiinfluencers.io, I think these influencers are already having quite a big impact on global trends in different industries, including the fashion world. I'm sure that soon we'll see advertising integrations with them more often.