Green Card Process 'Utterly Failing' To Help Immigrants 'Pursue the American Dream in Lawful and Orderly Ways'
A new Cato Institute report reveals that just 3 percent of those who have applied for green cards will get permanent status in the U.S. in FY 2024.

Only 3 percent of the people who have applied for green cards will receive one in FY 2024, as the backlog continues to grow and migrants continue to choose illegal migration pathways in large numbers. Today's green card processing "reveals a legal immigration system that is utterly failing to direct aspiring immigrants to pursue the American dream in lawful and orderly ways," wrote David J. Bier, associate director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute, in a report released last week.
About 1.1 million green cards may be issued in FY 2024, but there are currently 34.7 million pending applications. The backlog has its roots in the Immigration Act of 1924 and subsequent eligibility restrictions. While 98.1 percent of immigrant applicants were allowed to enter the country with permanent status from 1888 to 1921, just 16 percent of applicants were admitted in an average year once caps were imposed, per Bier. The rate fell to 3.8 percent in 2023.
Adding to the problem is the fact that the government has let 6.3 million green cards go to waste since 1921, failing to meet caps in large part due to processing delays.
Certain nationalities and green card categories experience more severe backlogs and selective processing. "Indians—who make up half the applicants in the employer-sponsored categories—must wait more than a century for a green card," wrote Bier. People who try their luck at the green card lottery, which currently has about 22.2 million applicants, only have a 1 in 400 chance of getting a green card in a given year. Some who apply for family-based green cards "will face lifetime waits for many country-category combinations," according to Bier.
By granting green cards to such a low percentage of applicants each year, the U.S. is leaving a lot of potential growth on the table. "Backlogged immigrants are likely to enter the United States and start working at higher rates than the general population, and they also appear to be more educated on average," wrote Bier. And beyond being an important addition to the labor force, immigrants are helping to reduce the massive federal budget deficit and stave off population decline.
The Cato report suggests that Congress do away with "the unnecessarily onerous rules and arbitrary caps to approve current green card applicants." After tackling the existing backlog, policy changes could be more modest, since "annual legal immigration would only need to increase more gradually to meet future demand."
This report echoes the findings of June 2023 Cato Institute research, which found that "fewer than 1 percent of people who want to move permanently to the United States can do so legally." A variety of factors keep people from qualifying for the existing green card categories, including low annual visa caps, a lack of U.S.-based sponsors (either employers or qualifying family members), narrow definitions of eligible nationalities, and cost.
Green card inaccessibility affects people who are already in the U.S., those who have applied and are still abroad, and those who would apply if not for the daunting and restrictive process. Policies that reduce the backlog and improve future processing could only benefit the American economy and incentivize would-be immigrants to pursue legal rather than illegal migration pathways.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Fuck you & fuck the immigrants Fiona.
The inn is full!
Thanks for deciding for EVERYONE else!
"About 1.1 million green cards may be issued in FY 2024, but there are currently 34.7 million pending applications."
Obviously we should stop accepting new applications until the backlog is cleared.
The great majority of those applications are low priority and should simply be tossed out entirely. For example, there is no reason the US should give green cards based on family relationships. Any green cards based on family relations should only be given to spouses and children and should be given, evaluated, and counted at the same time as the primary immigrant. For the rest, the process takes about ten years, so you have to divide those numbers by ten.
If the US had a skill-based immigration system with the objective of admitting people who make a net positive contribution to the US economy, even one million green cards per year would be hard to fill.
Under the law, as it stands, green cards for people who are family (spouses, parents, siblings - it's not exactly like you can bring your third cousin in for the lulz) should not be counted against the quota at all. The US government is breaking their own laws and Congress has refused to call them on it. The simple solution is for the government to not break the law.
Yeah, that's pretty much complete nonsense. You have no idea what you are talking about.
The limit on high skilled green cards is 140K per years which includes spouses and children so in reality the limit is around 50K of high skilled people. There is a further limit on country of birth in this means we can only issue green cards to may be around 7K Indians and 7K Chineses (with some exceptions because of which this number is little higher to around 11K per year).
Reduct the federal deficit and low population growth of native born americans?
Easy solution..Cut the Federal Govt by 60% and end all foreign military aid. Cut federal taxes to 10% so moms can stay home again and have large families and cook nutritious meals...kid obesity goes down as a bonus as does much of the "gender dysphoria" which is mostly driven lonely and isolated kids.
And this idea of single moms with five kids who don't speak english and have little education is not going to reduce the deficit.
Seeing as Obama and Biden have reduced the not a burden standard we used to have, don't care. Now green card applicants can in fact have utilized government transfers of money and still apply. Fix that and I would care more.
It probably doesn't help that the people in charge don't really want it to.
The system is working as intended. It allows Republicans to claim that "they are only against illegal immigration" while knowing that the legal path is very narrow, if the process works at all.
1.5M a year is narrow said the Act Blue account.
Yes. 1.5 million is narrow. US population is constantly growing. It's implausible to imagine that the country now needs less immigrants than it did in 2005.
But we haven't had 1.5 million immigrants per year, we have had more than 5 million immigrants per year, the majority illegal and we have tens of millions living in the country illegally.
All these people need to be assimilated. That means that we should stop all immigration for a couple of decades.
Don't flood the country with illegals if you want to be able to have an orderly legal immigration system.
> That means that we should stop all immigration for a couple of decades.
Legal immigration and illegal immigration is totally unrelated. Indian people coming to USA on H1B and applying to green card have nothing to do or have no relationship with illegal immigrants crossing the border.
"Close all immigration" for N years also is a meaningless phrase which leads to hurting only legal immigrants and has no impact on illegal immigration what so ever.
Donald Trump is by far and easily vocally more anti-immigrant president we have had and his 4 years saw anywhere between 2-3M illegal immigrants entering the country. That despite COVID which allowed him to use Title 42.
It is not possible to "close border" or "stop immigration" in any meaningful way.
Legal immigration and illegal immigration is totally unrelated.
To the contrary: whether 10 million people settle in the US legally or illegally, 10 million people need to be assimilated.
“Close all immigration” for N years also is a meaningless phrase which leads to hurting only legal immigrants
You are not a legal immigrant until you get a green card, so logically, no legal immigrant is hurt by not giving out green cards.
It is not possible to “close border” or “stop immigration” in any meaningful way.
It is quite easy, actually.
1.5M is very narrow given that illegal immigration is a magnitude more than that.
"About 1.1 million green cards may be issued in FY 2024..."
How many should be issued?
Are these green cards issued for particular skills?
What is the racial make up of these immigrants? Should the racial makeup of admitted immigrants be representative of the US population? DEI is apparently THE MOST IMPORTANT thing, so immigrants should be skilled, able to support themselves, able to speak English, and their racial distribution should be the same as existing US population. Importing resentment, hatred and poverty is not beneficial to the US.
Is there a combination of "Government" and "People" for which the statement:
is untrue?
Green Card Process 'Utterly Failing' To Help Native Americans 'Pursue the American Dream In Lawful and Orderly Ways'.
Healthcare Administration Process 'Utterly Failing' To Help African Americans 'Pursue the American Dream In Lawful and Orderly Ways'.
Election Verification and Validation Process 'Utterly Failing' To Help Americans 'Pursue the American Dream In Lawful and Orderly Ways'.
I expect that most of the folks coming across the Southern border wouldn’t qualify for a green card anyway. This article is just a distraction from the real problem.
7.3 million Border Patrol 'encounters' since Biden took office, and an estimated 1.8 million more 'gotaways', according to the Border Patrol. Which are all record highs. On pace to break 2023's record in 2024.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/7-2-million-illegals-entered-us-under-biden-administration-larger-than-population-of-36-states/articleshow/107891290.cms
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/02/15/migrant-encounters-at-the-us-mexico-border-hit-a-record-high-at-the-end-of-2023/
It's not just green cards, guys, it's the whole comprehensive policy. For most of the Trump presidency we were well under 50k per month. Obama averaged around 50k. Bush 100k before that. Now we're at 250k and rising. Something changed.
We could double or triple the number of green cards per year and it wouldn't affect illegal immigration one iota as those crossing illegally wouldn't qualify. Those illegally crossing at the southern border have no special skills and many are even illiterate in their own languages.
This is just phony argument by the open borders crowd.
I can sympathize with the individuals, but I'm not moved by the argument that our already generous immigration quotas are insufficient. Retaining national cohesion requires limiting immigration to a rate that allows assimilation. The point should be to create more Americans who hold traditional American values. Importing the third world and allowing them to supplant our values does harm to our nation's citizens. Even if you don't care about conservative/constitutionalist norms, it has been evident that we are displacing our own population with disparate other ones that do no share libertarian values.
The numbers quoted in this article make the point for her opposition. There are too many people who want to come here and if it was allowed then our population would be replaced.
Yes.
The ruling junta, which is massively overrepresented in government, is losing the support of the American voter.
The left's messiah, 0bama, lost 3.5 million votes, between '08, and '12, with an overall population increase of about 9 million, in that span.
The junta managed to suppress enough Republican votes to save 0bamacare, which was on the line in the 2012 election.
When HiLIARy ran, another 100,000 votes were lost, with a similar increase in the nation's population.
Trump's success as president was a warning that the junta needed extraordinary efforts to be implemented, because the support, for their communist ways, was shown to be even lower than before.
The junta became alarmed, and saw the need to steal, once again, the election in 2020, followed by this effort to import a new electorate.
It is why every effort for "comprehensive immigration reform" begins with amnesty for every illegal alien, so that they can get the voting bloc of that leftist-inclined, dependent on government, cadre.
The number of illegals, that were in the country, before the Great Replacement, would have turned the tide, but the junta wanted it to be even more of a sure thing, and with states giving a wink, and a nod, to illegals voting, anyway, the count is already distorted, such that a Republican can't get the National Popular Vote, those same states are pushing for.
Anyone, who doesn't see this is blind to the lawless, and corrupt, nature of the ruling junta, that has the gall to call itself the democrat party.
Just a word salad with nonsense like "assimilation", "traditional american values". People are going to come as long as Americans are pro-immigration. Nearly every american I have met including the Trumpian bumpkins are extremely immigrant friendly in their personal life. They not only employ and marry (legal and illegal) immigrants but also help them do business.
As long as that remains the case people will come irrespective of law. The government's choice here is to either have an orderly immigration system or something that gets abused and slapped by these people.
People are going to come as long as Americans are pro-immigration. Nearly every american I have met including the Trumpian bumpkins are extremely immigrant friendly in their personal life
Being friendly to immigrants isn’t the same as being pro-immigration, let alone being pro mass-immigration.
As long as that remains the case people will come irrespective of law.
It’s easy to stop illegal migration into a country: punish employers, deport illegals, and deny government services, housing, and financial services to illegals. Much of the rest of the world functions that way.
Just a word salad with nonsense like “assimilation”, “traditional american values”.
If you don’t understand the concept of assimilation, why don’t you go back to Bangladesh or whatever other sh*thole you came from.
When going through the line is ridiculous and stupid, people skip it.
Take away the incentive to skip the line by making immigration make sense.
Make immigration a net positive for the US.
My stance on immigration boils down to 'let them work.'
I think that not treating them like criminals for getting a job would go a long way in making immigration a net positive.
When a bunch of indigent, uneducated, unskilled people are allowed to work that will suppress wages for America's poor. What do you say to poor US citizens who will be harmed by "let them work"? A simple open door policy is foolish. Immigration policy should not cause harm to citizens, neither poor citizens nor middle class citizens.
Whats great is that people like Cesar Chavez actually understood these basic economic concepts. And he was a union farm worker. Sarc doesn't.
Cesar Chavez was using the immigration law as a protection racket for his union. Nice of you to admit that this is what you have in mind too when it comes to immigration law.
Cesar Chavez was using the immigration law as a protection racket for
his union.Hispanic farm workers.Yes, that's what we have in mind: using immigration law as a "protection racket" for American citizens.
When a bunch of indigent, uneducated, unskilled people are allowed to work that will suppress wages for America’s poor.
Actually, even Borjas, the most well-respected economist that is most skeptical of immigration, even he concluded that the wage competition of low-skill immigrants with low-skill native-born workers is relatively modest. This is because migrants either tend to compete with other migrants for work, or they tend to be entrepreneurial and create their own jobs with their own businesses.
Yes, illegal migrants and low skill immigrants have nearly completely taken over low skill jobs in the US. Therefore, at this point, there is little competition for jobs for low skill works with native-born workers, which is why native-born workers have left the job market and become drug addled welfare recipients.
If one is against minimum wage laws (on the irrefutable economic logic that in the long run government intervention that holds up wages will actually harm everyone in the country including the 'poor' it is intended to help) then there's no reason that government restriction of immigration will not have *the exact same effect*.
I remember when you denied the NY post story about only 2% of those given work permits actually finding a job. Good times.
Where do all these jobs for 8M new people exist? Hochul scrounged new york abd found about 1400 for the 40k there. I like your economic ignorance of jobs just magically appearing for low skilled workers.
That NY Post story was a bullshit story and you know it. The 2% figure only included the people who had applied for a work permit using one particular method (not all possible methods) and included children, the elderly, and people legally unable to work as those "unwilling to work". It was a complete misrepresentation of the truth designed to do exactly what you did with it - to push a false narrative of 'lazy migrants'.
The 2% figure only included the people who had applied for a work permit using one particular method (not all possible methods) and included children, the elderly, and people legally unable to work as those “unwilling to work”.
Yeah, the actual number is probably more like 5%. What's your point?
There is no incentive for any the two parties to fix this. Both sides virtue signal to their constituents about what they claim to want to do. But if something was actually fixed, then who is there to blame?
True. Both sides want increased immigration. Democrats for their "great replacement" strategy. Republicans for the suppression of labor costs.
And yet somehow the USA gets more immigration than any other larger nation on the planet.
Yes indeed. It is "utterly failing" to filter-out socialist dreamers from invading and conquering the American dream by a margin of 70%+.
That's just not even true in absolute numbers? Russia of all places received 4.2 *million* legal immigrants in 2021. That's a country that is half the population of the USA and not even very attractive for immigrants.
But I'm not shocked that borderwankers aren't capable of arguing in good faith.
Figures compiled by the Putin vote counting committee.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/08/20/key-findings-about-u-s-immigrants/
"The United States has more immigrants than any other country in the world. "
Now do how low a percentage of people applying for loans at banks get the money, and how this justifies bank robbery.
Fiona, speaking as an immigrant, it is people like you and Bier who have turned legal US immigration into a clown show with your advocacy for illegal migration, amnesty, and vast increases in immigration quotas.
It took me over a decade to even get my green card, whereas illegal immigrants were celebrating getting citizenship on TV after less than half a dozen years.
The US naturalizes over one million people per year. That is a reasonable rate of immigration. If you stopped giving green cards and citizenship to illegals and the children of illegals, many more people could immigrate.
14% of the US is foreign born. That is on the high end of what is feasible for assimilation. That is nearly triple of the percentage when I came to the US. I came to the US because it was a competitive, meritocratic society based on free markets and individual liberties. I assure you: as you keep flooding the country with third world migrants from an authoritarian, socialist country, people like me will stop coming and may be leaving.
You and Cato are enemies of immigrants and of the American people.
It's very simple in my mind:
If the goal of immigration was to prevent those alleged third-worlders from 'swamping' the US, then it would be still easy for a person from a first-world country to enter.
Is it easy for a well-educated person from a first-world country to enter? No it is not. If the system does not allow Karl the German Engineer to enter in an easy and simple way and impedes him from finding a job offer, then this is not about 'reasonable controls', it's about bullshit.
If the goal of immigration was to prevent those alleged third-worlders from ‘swamping’ the US, then it would be still easy for a person from a first-world country to enter.
You may think in terms of those racist categories, but that is not how the US immigration system functions, is supposed to function, or ought to function.
The US immigration system ought to
(1) be based on meritocracy and select the most skilled and successful immigrants regardless of country of origin or ethnicity,
(2) keep out populations, groups, and ethnicities that have a substantially elevated probability of wanting to harm the US or undermine its form of government; this overrides (1),
(3) limit the total number of immigrants per year to a rate that can be assimilated into US society
If the system does not allow Karl the German Engineer to enter in an easy and simple way and impedes him from finding a job offer, then this is not about ‘reasonable controls’, it’s about bullshit.
“Karl the German Engineer”, just like “Singh the Indian Engineer”, and “Wang the Chinese Engineer”, can’t “enter in an easy and simple way” because the US immigration system is backlogged and clogged with faux-refugees, family reunification, diversity visa recipients, etc.
If we eliminated illegal migration and illegal alien presence in the US, limited refugees to a few tens of thousands a year, and had a meritocratic immigration system, all those “X the engineer” could get green cards within a few months.