Tennessee Deputy Dies While Texting and Driving, Killing Suspect in the Back Seat
While the deputy's death is tragic, all evidence indicates that the woman handcuffed in his back seat died as a result of his negligence.

Last week, a rookie Tennessee police officer died in the line of duty. But while the loss of the officer is tragic, evidence suggests that his death—as well as the death of a woman in his custody—was a result of his negligence.
Meigs County Deputy Robert "R. J." Leonard, who had just joined the sheriff's office fresh out of the academy in December, responded to a call of a disturbance Wednesday night. According to reports, a man and woman were fighting on a bridge, and Leonard arrested the woman around 10 p.m. According to Meigs County District Attorney Russell Johnson, the arrest was Leonard's first since joining the force.
After handcuffing the suspect—later identified as Tabitha Smith—and placing her in the back seat, Leonard radioed in that he was transporting her to jail. But on the way, according to Johnson, the deputy apparently sent his wife a text that read simply, "Arrest."
"His wife texted back and said, 'That's good' or 'That's great,'" said Sheriff Austin Garrett of nearby Hamilton County. But at that time, Leonard apparently drove the wrong way down a Blythe Ferry boat ramp and into the Tennessee River. At the same time Leonard texted his wife, dispatchers say they received a garbled radio message from him, with the only discernible word being "water."
The following day, a patrol vehicle was removed from the Tennessee River, from which the bodies of Leonard and Smith were later recovered.
While Leonard's death is tragic, leaving behind not only his wife but three children, all too little attention was paid to the woman who died, handcuffed, in his custody. Chief Deputy Brian Malone fought back tears as he announced Leonard's death, referring to Leonard as "part of our family," while only referring to Smith—herself a mother of two—as "the other victim."
The report filed on the events by Los Angeles' ABC7 features the headline, "Bodies of missing Tennessee deputy and woman who had been detained recovered, officials say." But that was changed from the original headline, "Tennessee deputy found dead after making first arrest, patrol vehicle recovered from river." While this reflects an earlier time when less information was available, that article still featured the detail that dispatchers had lost communication with Leonard right as he was texting his wife and that "the deputy, a native of New York, appeared to be texting and radioing while driving in a poorly lit area he was unfamiliar with."
Indeed, a report on Chattanooga's ABC9 noted that the crash "raises questions over safety on Blythe Ferry boat ramps," but the segment still shows that the road leading to the boat ramp in question featured three "rumble strips"—bumps in the road meant to alert drivers to upcoming danger—and three yellow signs warning that "road ends."
Unfortunately, Smith is just one of countless people to die in police custody. In 2014, Congress passed the Death in Custody Reporting Act, which requires the federal government to collect and analyze data on the number of inmates who die each year in state, local, or federal custody. But a report published last year by the Leadership Conference Education Fund and the Project on Government Oversight found that the government "has yet to collect reliable data, let alone produce the required study." Citing data from the Government Accountability Office, the report notes that "in 2021 alone, the government potentially undercounted deaths in custody by nearly 1,000 compared to other public data sources."
Leonard's crash was almost certainly an accident, driving down a dark road in an unfamiliar area at night. But preliminary evidence suggests a degree of negligence, both by texting while driving and failing to heed multiple posted signs. While Leonard's death was a tragedy, it is necessary to note that his negligence also caused the death of a woman in his custody.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
>>Leonard's crash was almost certainly an accident
there are no accidents only negligent actions. the QI question will be fun.
a man and woman were fighting on a bridge, and Leonard arrested the woman around 10 p.m.
AFAICT she worked extra hard to beat a man at the stupid game to win the stupid prize.
ma'am when the police show always be the most quiet.
At that was somehow a capital crime? I'm used to your copsucking, but I'm surprised even you would find a way to victim-blame a woman for getting drowned due to a cop's gross negligence. Or am I just crazy for thinking that cops should have some responsibility for not driving off the road and drowning prisoners?
How much money would a rookie cop’s widow have?
I believe QI is applicable to the agent ofvthe state's personal liability. The county's liability would possibly be blocked by sovereign immunity.
Just like the flipping cops to say nothing of the victim of police manslaughter, only their crappy loser officer.
the government potentially undercounted deaths in custody by nearly 1,000 compared to other public data sources.
Could be worse. They could've been found guilty and sentenced to death by a 9-3 split decision.
GPS?
Wasn't that also in The Big Sleep? No GPS there.
Next time believe me when I say the red lines are roads, the blue lines are rivers!
>>Wasn’t that also in The Big Sleep?
also Risky Business ... "who's the U-Boat Commander?"
I think I've got it, courtesy of Google Maps. The bridge where the fighting took place must've been on Route 58 over the Hiwassee River. Seeking a shortcut to Route 60, the deputy took a right turn onto Blythe Ferry Lane, and took it all the way to the drink.
Same day that Billy Joe McAllister jumped off the Tallahassee bridge.
By some horrible accident I know the song, and I wish I didn't because of its egregiously maudlin tone...so I know that it's the Tallahatchie bridge.
Seeking a shortcut to Route 60, the deputy took a right turn onto Blythe Ferry Lane
^this
I looked at some pictures of the boat ramp. The road, lined with trees, runs straight off into the boat ramp. If he missed the signs, there are no lights at all and no barrier to indicate the road ends.
Writing that the deputy drove the wrong way down a boat ramp is a misleading narrative. There was no way he could have stopped once he left the road. Hitting the water would have been like driving into a wall.
If he put down the fucking phone perhaps he'd have noticed something.
I have to question his local training in this situation. When you sign on with various emergency services, it's totally common practice for new folks to drive around endlessly to figure out where all the obscure crap is. Maybe his training officer could have pointed this out!
I suppose QI would also apply to drunk driving?
Is texting while driving a crime in the state of Tennessee? If so looks like criminal negligence and the county owes this woman's survivors some serious cash.
That's just stealing and shoveling innocent people's money around.
Yeah the taxpayers pay the bill. But they got the government they elected.
SOME of them elected, but, sure; root to loot the people who DIDN’T vote for that county’s government. Show us how much *you* care; *you* should give the family the X million dollars that they “deserve”.
But while the loss of the officer is tragic
Not especially.
He invited this accident and his own death. It's sad that he took another person with him. If he'd lived, he would have received qualified immunity and walked away, after taking a human life.
Ms. Smith's death was tragic. The deputy's death was Darwin in action.
Don't be an asshole. The rookie cop may have been a very dedicated young man who seized an opportunity in his city of few opportunities. Can't really say it's all his fault when the hiring and training systems obviously failed him seriously.
Yeah maybe the kid could have consumed one of those "don't text and drive" PSA's that litter the earth. Maybe on the patrol room wall or something....
This is why we can't have nice things. When the people we "entrust" with public safety go and do stupid things like this it's another straw on the camels back. Eventually that breaks and we get more texting and driving laws that are idiotic and simply expand the power of the state.
Tragic? Maybe for individual liberty.
Honestly, I don't have a huge problem with laws against texting while driving. I don't really care to share the road with impaired drivers. It doesn't matter whether they're drunk, high, falling asleep, glued to their phone or just really damn stupid. My car and possibly my body are going to be just as banged up in any case.
Cops have always thought themselves to be exempt from traffic laws, even in their personal vehicles when they're on personal business. Turns out they don't have the godlike skills they think they do.
I doubt he expected to drive across the water followed by feeding the county with a couple of catfish and a bucket of his mother's potato salad.
No, but he apparently did think he was qualified to drive while distracted. Having seen some of the antics cops get up to whether it's speeding, driving while distracted or just general recklessness, I have to agree with Dave. A few years ago I nearly got clipped by a cop who cut a corner too tight, with no flashers or other sign he was even on an emergency run. Oh, and I was in the right lane, so if anyone had been in the left turn lane he would have smacked them head-on . Several years before that I just barely avoided getting creamed by another cop. A couple of cars were running with flashers but no sirens even though it was the middle of the day in the business district. It was a bright, sunny day so I just barely saw the flashers in time to stop short of the intersection where they were turning left. One block later one of them T-boned a senior citizen. The only good news is that the golden-ager was in a Grand Marquis. Since that was just a rebadged version of the cop's Crown Vic, there was a lot of property damaged but no serious injury.
a rookie Tennessee police officer died in the line of duty.
More precisely, an egotistic Tennessee police officer killed himself and another person while committing a crime. 8-(
Sadly, this entrant in the Darwin Awards took an innocent victim with him.
I think the woman, who had already passed on her genetics, disqualifies this as a full Darwin Award. Also we don't know if the officer had reproduced. We can hope he didn't being he was clearly dumber than a box of rocks.
We do know the Officer reproduced (3 times in fact):
leaving behind not only his wife but three children
Why is someone that graduated from the academy working on his own in less than two months? Most patrol training is at least 5 to 6 months. And even with that it takes another year before you even begin to feel like you know what you are doing. Sounds like a backwater country bumpkin department in a state with no standards.
US cops in general have abysmal training standards. On average it takes twice as much training to become a barber with combs and scissors than to become a LEO with a badge and a gun.
"rookie" - The Ghost of Ted Kennedy
Leonard apparently drove the wrong way down a Blythe Ferry boat ramp
The critical thinking skills of Joe Lancaster just never seem to improve. It is ridiculous to say Leonard drove the wrong way when there is no correct way to drive down a boat ramp. I had to read it twice because I couldn't figure out what "wrong way" was intended to communicate from the context leading up to it. It implies negligence not in evidence.
Sorry to be so pedantic, but sloppy writing is demonstrative of sloppy thinking.
And the picture chosen to accompany this article is completely misleading as is the story that Lancaster chooses to relate. Watch the video in the link in the story and you find out that Leonard was not driving the wrong way at all as it is a two-way road that goes straight to the ramp. It looks like every other road in rural Tennessee right up until it exits the woods and terminates at the ramp. If he was going even 30 mph, there is no way he could have stopped short of the water. He didn't drive "down" the ramp, he drove "off" the ramp.
Yes, there are signs that he clearly ignored if he was looking at his phone, but the worn out rumble strips probably didn't even register. It is a shitty rural road at night with no lights or warning signal. A little actual research might tell us how many other people have made the same mistake. It is a little surprising to me that Leonard was unable to exit the vehicle and get to the surface. He may very well have died trying to save his passenger.
This actually is a tragedy and if it was not for the click-bait worthy headline, this is not a story that gets national coverage. It should have been left quietly alone.
The headline is correct !
Driving the right way is to back down the ramp with a trailer - tail first, as the wrong way is to go down front first.
Regardless of which direction the vehicle was facing, kinda hard to imagine a more wrong way than the one where no boat is launched and everyone involved in not launching any boat dies.
"Wrong way" means driving on the ramp at all instead of turning. No one is even a little confused except for your disingenuous ass. Pretty bad when even m.c is making more sense. (At least in this thread.)
"This strains credulity."
That's what I originally thought when I first read this article.
Then I dug into it a little further, and now my thought is, "Joe Lancaster is a dishonest hack pushing yet another Reason-published ACAB narrative that grossly distorts the actual reporting.
Here's a key piece of omitted info (pulled from citations IN the article): "His wife texted back and said, 'That's good' or 'That's great,'" Garrett said at a press briefing earlier on Thursday. "We know that his phone did not evidently receive that text."
So, there's half the "texting" angle right out the window.
Combine that with the other text that apparently was pretty close in time to his last garbled/lost radio communication - both of which are highly suggestive that he was making them AFTER he went into the drink (with an open car window, I might add), not before. That is to say, they're more likely panic communications that occurred after he drove into the river, rather than the cause of under the claims of "negligent distracted driving".
And apparently going in the drink from this boat launch isn't a one off.
- Officials said just last month another person drove into the water in the same area but survived.
- Several cars have driven into the river in the past, authorities said.
So it's treacherous territory and he's unfamiliar with it in the first place; its got a conspicious lack of lighting and signage, as well as its abruptness (and apparently it's not the only boat launch like this in the area that the locals have complained about - "Both sides turn from road to river very quickly, and feature relatively few safety measures."); and at least one report mentioned another potential cause:
So, if he wasn’t paying attention because he was distracted by the person in the back.
Which, let's face it - that's a thing that happens with pissed off people under arrest and on their way to jail. I only mention it because other articles mentioned it, but Reason chose to omit that potential contributing factor for some reason.
Maybe because their ACAB clickbait headline wouldn't make sense if they did. Or if they reported any of this story fairly and objectively. (Don't even get me started on the wholly misleading Dreamstime photo they used, instead of the readily available photo that paints a completely different picture of this particular dock. In case you're curious:
https://newschannel9.com/resources/media/aad426b2-c615-49b7-89e1-3d6e4191e9da-medium16x9_MeigsCountyboatramp.PNG
Finally - let's throw out one more quick idea. His text to his wife, which appears to have been made when he's already in the water and is quickly filling his vehicle through his open window. Radio's failed. Maybe - just maybe - this cop was doing whatever he could think of to alert someone that he had someone under arrest in the back of his car.
Never even entertained the notion though, did you Reason. Wouldn't want to disrupt the narrative.
(Oh, and ps - don't pretend like you're extensively sourcing your article (16 in-line citations!) when most of them are just the same couple stories OVER AND OVER again. For the record: FOX three times, Instagram twice, ABC four times (twice in once sentence, even!), and three links specifically devoted to grinding the "died in police custody" axe.)
Once more with feeling:
https://i.imgur.com/LZRBivg.png
Yeah I kind of had a feeling it was something like this.
Then I dug into it a little further, and now my thought is, “Joe Lancaster is a dishonest hack pushing yet another Reason-published ACAB narrative that grossly distorts the actual reporting.
Having experience from when Joe first started contributing to Reason, I started with this premise and worked backwards to confirm it.
Nice job finding the references to previous accidents. After seeing video and pictures of the boat ramp, I was pretty certain this deputy was not the first person to drive off the road there. It doesn't take much research to write a better story, but the real story does not fit the narrative.
Is it Shit on Reason Day? Oh, right, it's always Shit on Reason Day. If he was texting after he went into the water, that was still deeply stupid and negligent. Get out of the damn car and save yourself or there's no chance you can save anyone else. And the idea that the single word "arrest" with no other context was intended as some kind of warning is ludicrous.
If people have repeatedly launched themselves off this ramp, that still suggests some official negligence even if not by the deputy himself. If similar accidents keep happening in the same place, I don't think it's asking too much for whoever's responsible for maintaining the road to at least put up some clearer warning signs or take further measures to help people avoid a known hazard.
Reason for stricter texting while driving laws?
It continues to be amazing the way the forum comes into these stories with a suspension of disbelief and a complete disregard for any all consequences.
Like the group that nominally would be the most opposed to the establishment and operation of star chambers would, ironically, be the best persons to staff it. Reason always frames the clearly guilty party in accordance with the preconceived notions, why would you question what you didn't see happen otherwise?
Or, this is crazy, maybe we could expect cops to follow laws? TN has had a law against texting while driving on the books since 2009. A cop of all people should be expected to know that.
But at least no dogs were shot.
A cop who has an deaths/arrest rate of 2. This has to be a record.
Arrestee '...What do I need a seat belt for?...'
Officer '...It's for your protection Ma'am....'
Well at least he and his wife had one last celebratory moment of taking someone’s liberty. Imagine if he could have also bragged he managed his first kill as well. At any rate, one look at his wife and you can see she’s a hard one. Got to hand it the the police department as well. Their new pick tuned out to be a bad driver, and lawless texted as well but they have nothing but condolences for someone who just murdered a woman.