NYC Child Protection Agency Uses 'Coercive Tactics' To Bully Parents Into Allowing Warrantless Searches
According to a new lawsuit, NYC's child protection agency almost never obtained warrants when it searched over 50,000 family homes during abuse and neglect investigations.

Every year, thousands of New York City families are subjected to invasive home searches as part of child abuse and neglect investigations. While less than 7 percent of these investigations lead the agency to file claims of abuse or neglect, a new lawsuit alleges that the city's Administration for Children's Services (ACS) workers often make misleading—or outright false—threats to coerce parents to allow ACS to conduct warrantless searches of their homes.
According to the lawsuit, which was filed on Tuesday, ACS employs a widespread policy of coercing families under investigation to allow case workers into their homes. ACS workers allegedly often tell families that they "must" or "have to" let them search their homes, insist that they do not need a warrant for the search, and even threaten to take noncompliant parents' children away.
Even though ACS workers are technically legally required to obtain a warrant to search homes, the agency very rarely seeks them. According to the suit, of the almost 53,000 investigations conducted by ACS in 2023, it only sought 222 court orders to search families' homes.
"Even assuming ACS completed only one home search during each investigation (it typically conducts several), ACS sought court orders for just 0.4% of home entries," the suit states. "This means over 99.5% of home searches that ACS conducts are 'presumptively unreasonable' under the Fourth Amendment."
Once inside a family's home, the suit claims that ACS workers engage in incredibly invasive tactics, looking "inside medicine cabinets, under beds, in closets and dresser drawers, in the refrigerator, and in cupboards." Even more troubling, strip searches of children are common, with workers demanding that children lift up their shirts or pull down their pants. Over the course of an investigation—the average length is 60 days—families are typically subjected to these searches more than once.
The agency itself seems self-aware about the impact of these coercive techniques. According to one 2020 report by the National Innovation Service, ACS policy "incentivizes [staff] to be invasive and not tell parents their rights." The report noted how "the experience of an investigation, even when an allegation is ultimately determined to be unfounded, too often traumatizes parents and children."
Further, agency leadership has also acknowledged that many reports of child abuse and neglect are completely unfounded, as individuals are allowed to make anonymous reports. A 2023 letter from the New York City Bar went so far as to state that a "significant percentage of" child abuse hotline callers "make false reports, for the purpose of harassment."
In all, the suit argues that ACS' policy of using coercive tactics to enter families' homes without a warrant constitutes a violation of their Fourth Amendment rights, arguing that the agency's "failure to adequately train or supervise ACS caseworkers regarding the protection of parents' Fourth Amendment rights" has directly led ACS workers to use manipulative, false tactics to persuade families to allow them to "conduct warrantless, non-exigent searches of Plaintiffs' and class members' homes."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Won’t you think of the motherfucking children?
I'd imagine those are one of the groups of children they really do want to remove from their homes.
How about the childrenfucking mothers?
If they have evidence of that, they need to take it to a judge and get a warrant.
Police state enforced by social workers.
Indiana just took a kid from religious parents despite no abuse for not letting the kid transition.
Sure. Because in the eyes of the ideological orthodoxy that controls the State, protecting a child from horrible and irreversible mutilation with lifelong health consequences is abuse.
I'm shocked, shocked I tell you, to learn that mindless bureaucrats are abusing their power.
They are just refs.
Sounds like plug's dream job:
>>allow ACS to conduct warrantless searches of their homes.
>>allow case workers into their homes.
operative word ...
NYC? This is standard practice throughout the country.
This is pretty much standard police practice, period. Unless you are a lawyer or have one on speed dial, it's hard to stand up to a mob of police in body armor threatening to shoot your dogs.
Not t sure body armor is necessary . Think most parents are too shocked to react to the threat of having their kids taken away if they don’t let them in. I’m guessing too that 99% of the time it’s the parent’s ex who calls CPS.
Wonder how much NYC pays the CPS gestapo agents? Probably get a bonus for each search they conduct.
They get a piece of the action on the adoptions they arrange after taking a kid from their family.
Well, as I was told this morning, it is the duty of the state to 'protect children'. So what if a few parental liberties are sacrificed along the way. The goal is to make sure the children are taken care of. Isn't that right?
Your sarcasm is appalling. These caseworkers are overwhelmed as the need is so great. They are dedicated, caring public servants who shouldn't have to comply with warrant requirements, which are for the investigation of crimes, not the protection of children. Constitutional rights end where there is reason to investigate parental treatment of children.
And what do the parents have to hide?
Is this Jeffy parodying himself?
Ha ha. You got the sarcasm.