The Sindex: Cigarette Prices Outpacing Inflation
The Reason Sindex tracks the price of vice: smoking, drinking, snacking, traveling, and more.

Inflation stressing you out? Making you wish you had just a touch of nicotine in your system? Unfortunately, that'll cost a lot. While prices economywide have risen 3.1 percent in the last year, cigarette prices have jumped 8 percent. On top of federal and state taxes that often make up half the price of a pack, tobacco companies tend to raise their prices faster than inflation to make up for declining sales volume. These and the rest of the numbers in the Reason Sindex use data from November 2023.
Category | Change since January 2020 | Change in last year |
---|---|---|
Overall Inflation | 18.9% | 3.1% |
Tobacco and smoking products | 30.0% | 7.7% |
Cable, satellite, and livestreaming services | 16.2% | 4.3% |
Medicinal drugs | 6.2% | 5.0% |
Meats | 26.8% | 3.6% |
Televisions | -22.6% | -9.5% |
Cigarettes | 31.3% | 8.0% |
Sugar and sweets | 25.6% | 5.4% |
Airline fares | -5.6% | -12.1% |
Gasoline, unleaded regular | 25.5% | -9.3% |
Prescription drugs | 3.1% | 3.8% |
Alcoholic beverages (At home) | 10.0% | 1.5% |
Alcoholic beverages (Away from home) | 18.5% | 5.2% |
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
No specific mention of chewing tobacco. Some of us would like to new.
I new yew wood stay that!
Category Change since January 2020 Change in last year
STUPID Reason Comments
. . . . . +3.67% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +537.9%
Trumpanzees have taken over, and Idiocracy is at hand!!!!
You're doing more than your share.
Sure, ALL of the regulars KNOW that I'm one of the foremost Trumpanzees, leading us all to Idiocracy! Where's my vaccine antidote, that I might help re-erect the Sacred Stolen Trump Erections?!?!?
And 99.9% of that inflation is from you, Jeffy, Sarc, Pluggo, Misek, M4e, and misconstrueman alone.
Nice of you to keep track of your comments like that. Do you keep a diary?
And I thought the church of squirrels was a bit strange.
Really? Sins?
Prescriptions.
Meat.
Televisions.
Airline travel
Agreed. I don't grant their premise that these are "sins."
And if humans had either biological bodies that could heal and rebuild themselves or cyborg bodies, none of these would be either "sins" or even self-harming vices.
This is getting on the bottom of the lameness abyss for Reason.
haven't you heard of the climate church
Praise Gaia and her prophet Greta!
Amen brother:
https://vvattsupwiththat.blogspot.com/2024/02/but-what-about-guy-in-chicken-suit.html
That was going to be my comment. Some explanation of why buying gas for your car is a sin would be helpful much less prescription drugs and airline travel. This index makes little sense.
Prescriptions (drugs). If we were Perfect, we wouldn't need them. Therefor, a sin and a vice! The ONLY out is if you get GOD to write your prescription!
Meat. Eating meat stops a beating heart! Even if you wait for the animal to die first, ye are depriving maggots and organisms of decay, of THEIR meal!
Televisions. Ask the Amish; they can explain it better than I can. I think it might have something to do with, you might get exposed to WRONG theology on that them thar EVIL TV!
Airline travel. Ask the Amish, again. Also carbon emissions! If God had meant for us to fly, He'd have given us wings!
Wait, wait, WAIT a minute now! I have finally, fully fingered shit out!
Keeping or spending ANY money for your own selfish (bodily or otherwise) purposes is, indeed a SIN, because shit ALL belongs to Government Almighty!!! Now start Worshitting the RIGHT thing! Praises Be to GAWD!!! = = Government Almighty's Wrath Delivers!!! And ONLY GAWD, for our TrumptatorShit and our BudenFuhrer are a jealous GAWD!!!
Oooops, meant "BidenFuhrer" not "BudenFuhrer"... I suppose Buddha-en Fuhrer might work ass well? Was The Buddha very talented at hair-sniffing?
Speaking of medication...
Is there a decently effective medication for compulsive hair-sniffing, Oh Wise Doctor Un-Earthly non-Human Septic? Does it work on our planet ass well ass yours?
(Twat we REALLY need on OUR planet, though, truth be told, is a cure for all of the TDS, which are Trump's Deranged Supporters!)
Does it work on our planet ass well ass yours?
So, uh, what exactly is your planet, Sqrlsy, 'cause it sure as hell ain't Earth?
I cum from Planet Not-Addicted-to-The-Stolen-Erections-"Theory"! Ass such, I am QUITE sure that this must be a TOTALLY alien planet to you! Butt do NOT worry about it... No matter HOW strange, or strangely devoted to the Theory of The Stolen Erections, that you might becum... The Donald is SNOT going to let you fuck Spermy Daniels! She is sexclusively HIS Queen, Who Art Drenched in an Obscene Scene of Vaseline! So just FORGET this shit! Shit is TWAT gonna happen!!!
"Even if you wait for the animal to die first, ye are depriving maggots and organisms of decay, of THEIR meal!"
But eating vegetables deprives an animal of its meal.
Television is a vice, definitely. What passes for mainstream content nowadays would’ve been considered porn not long ago–and rightly so! To say nothing of the violence of the content. Even if we ignore the time-wasting aspect of it (and wasting time is a vice), 99% television is filth.
Oh, cum ON now! TRY the very latest TV, with an open mind, please!!! Right now, The Donald is getting shit ON with Spermy Daniels, Our Queen, in a Glaze of Vaseline!!! Twat a scene, twat a SCENE!!! TV will RAISE your Spirits up HIGHER, till you meet your DESIRE!!!
(Just so long ass your desire is SNOT the One and Only Spermy Daniels, Our Queen, in a Glaze of Vaseline, Who Art Reserved for Our Emperor, Dear Leader, and Dear Leader alone! Don't get TOO greedy, now!)
So travel, medicine, and meat are now considered vices?
Who decided that? Asking for a friend so my friend can punch him in the face.
Well, "Meat is Murder" I've been told by some people, so if you consider murder a sin...
Oddly eating bugs is not murder. Or something.
That's because bugs eat us.
Vegans are what they eat eats, and it's not pretty.
Hmm, TVs show the biggest price decline. Any chance Big Brother is behind this?
No, they are cheap because they are made in China, almost everyone has one (huge supply, little demand since 4k content isn't there), and they are subsidized somewhat by the advertising the manufacturer sells.
Walmart wants to buy Vizio because of the latter. Vizio has been very aggressive with ads, even having them take over antenna TV , forcing it into their ad ridden "Free View" platform while also sucking your internet bandwidth
A focus on "sin" and taxes? The perfect melding of libertarian and libertine.
Cigarettes and tobacco products are possibly the most regulated products in that list. Coincidence? I think not!
Others covered the "Meat is not a sin" aspect.
But I might also point out that that number is bullshit. It's official, and correct, but bullshit.
The way the prices are compiled for these stats allows basket switching. So, if I was buying ribeyes on sale for $5 a pound but now I can't afford ribeyes that are $9 or $10 a pound and buy a london broil or chuck for $6, they call that 20% inflation. Because "meat" just means "Meat".
Where I live, I regularly got better cuts for roughly half what I pay now for the same cuts. Pork that used to go on sale for 99 cents to a buck and a half (the crappy shoulder picnic roasts) is $2.49. The $2.50/3 a pound loin is $5. Chicken has roughly doubled, though you can still get slight breaks on sale, that are only 30-40% more.
SO, yeah. Meats aren't 20%, they're close to double, if you go kind for kind.
Beef is a rare treat for me now. Haven't been able to afford fresh fish for years. Can still afford pork and chicken.
Sorry to hear that. I eat a lot of beans these days, for health rather than money reasons. Fish is mostly good for your health but bad for your budget, as I suspect that you know already. Other than that, your meat-habits will leave your health as well as your budget better off. Too much RED meat in my getting-older years gave me GOUT, for one thing!!! But... Beans!!! Beans are a GREAT source of protein and fiber; good for what ails ye!!! (Also nuts.)
Yeah, before Covid and the Trump-Biden currency printing bonanza I would regularly get frozen Mahi-mahi once a week. The price has basically tripled while my wages went up 50%
Anyone who has purchased meat knows these official numbers are pig shit.
Ground chuck one of the cheapest of all beefs is up 200%
So just what does the official inflation rate track? Seems like like it should care more about food and less about cheap electronics made in China
So, I'm not really clear what I'm supposed to take from this.
Are you against Bidenomics and this Administration's efforts to wreck the American economy in general, or just upset that it's affecting your vices more than anything else?
Like, would you be OK with the inflation if it were affecting corn the same way it was affecting tobacco? And, if not, then why not specifically focus the article on why the Biden Admin's inflation is problematic in its own right rather than single out only the vices?
No problem ... I'll 'splain it to you! The narrative from every administration over the last six decades - not just the current one - has been that the economy is hurting the little guy and that the government's job is to protect the little guy from any and all painful choices. The only way they can think of (although most of us would not call it thinking) is to print and borrow and spend more money than the government collects in revenues, massively inflating the currency and hurting the little guy much more than "the economy" would have without the government's "help." All clear now?
Nice summary.
I second the motion... That IS a "fair and balanced" summary!!!!
"On top of federal and state taxes that often make up half the price of a pack"
50% federal and state retail taxes
+25% federal income tax to earn the price-tag.
+8% annual ?free? money-tree USD inflation.
---------------------------------------------
83% of YOUR labor goes to Politicians-Government.
Who's the plantation owner of slave camps again?
Unfortunately, lately there have been changes in the lives of each of us that are related to what surrounds us. And you’re right, prices for goods are often inflating. so I was interested in finding alternative ways to earn money. Trailing is what gives me a good income. And this trading margin calculator is what helps me make decisions. It accounts for market volatility and gives traders precise margin needs based on the state of the market at the time. For traders to successfully negotiate the constantly shifting Forex market and steer clear of overleveraging amid spikes in volatility, they must possess this flexibility.
Yet people continue to smoke. The cigarette companies and the government both know that demand will not really change no matter how much they raise the price, whether by inflation, taxes, or both.
People continue to eat meat, drink alcohol, and fly too-you can thank the Covid handouts for the higher prices.
While this article attempts to deceive readers to believe that
recent cigarette price hikes were caused by taxation and regulation by Big Bad Government, virtually every cigarette price hikes during the past decade was imposed by cigarette manufacturers to offset rapidly declining sales/consumption (as vaping has replaced most cigarette smoking among those <40, and has replaced the vast majority of cigarette smoking among those <30, and has replaced virtually all cigarette smoking by those <20.
In fact, since the FDA first banned e-cigarettes in 2009 (by falsely claiming they were gateways to cigarettes for teens), the cigarette smoking rate among US high school students has declined from 22% to <2% (a 90% decline).
Thank vaping for the massive decline in cigarette consumption during the past decade.
While some fundamentalist Christians used to preach (75-200 years ago) that tobacco, alcohol, opioids, cocaine, caffeine, nudity, porn, nonmarital sex, contraceptives, abortions, out-of-wedlock children, working Sundays, and even dancing and playing cards were sins) as they campaigned/lobbied to ban all of these products and activities, they've limited their prohibition campaigns to just banning abortion (and contraceptives).
As an atheist, the only reason I spent the last 40 years increasing the price of cigarettes from $1/pack to almost $10/pack now was because cigarette smoking is still the leading cause of disease and death. These price hikes (via litigation and taxation) have been the key reason why US cigarette consumption has declined from 32 billion packs in 1983 to less than 8 billion packs in 2023.
Meanwhile, the cigarette smoking among high school students has plummeted from 30% in 1997 to less than 2% in 2023 (due to price hikes, smoking bans and especially vaping).
If you keep tobacco, alcohol, opioids, cocaine, caffeine, porn, promiscuous sex, out-of-wedlock children, overworking, and gambling out of your life, your chances for a happy and fulfilling life greatly improve. Frequently, traditional wisdom becomes traditional because it is correct.
As an atheist, the only reason I spent the last 40 years increasing the price of cigarettes from $1/pack to almost $10/pack now was because cigarette smoking is still the leading cause of disease and death.
Um, I'm pretty sure that's not even a little bit true. Even at its most generous interpretation, one would have to conclude you don't know the difference between "cause" and "contributor."
Also, why'd you feel compelled to enlist the State to price them out of use? What, you couldn't successfully argue the subject on its merits? Kinda like Biden and the menthols, because the darned black people just don't know what's good for them?
Despite AP's false ad hominem smears against me, the answer to
his/her question was/is economist call "external costs", which are the billions of dollars spent by federal, state and local taxpayers to
treat many chronic diseases and disabilities caused by cigarettes (via Medicaid, Medicare, SS, VA, state/local governments), extinguishing fires (which are still the leading cause of home fires), cleaning up cigarette butt litter, etc.
Like all healthcare inflation, the cost of treating sick and dying smokers have increased twice as much as other that of overall inflation since the 1980.
The cigarettes that smokers bought for <$1/pack (before and during the 1980s) caused diseases and disabilities costing tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars to treat, and smokers are far more likely to receive government provided and subsidized healthcare (than nonsmokers).
Also, because cigarettes are taxed by the pack (not as a percentage of price), state cigarette tax rates declined sharply from WWII until I began campaigning to increase cigarette tax rates in the 1980s.
The good news is that these government policies to hold cigarettes accountable for the harm they caused has helped reduce adult cigarette smoking to just 11%, (down from 35% in the 1960s), and helped reduce teen smoking to <2%.
And unlike government bans of illegal drugs, cigarette smokers and cigarette sellers were NEVER arrested or incarcerated.
the answer to his/her question was/is economist call “external costs”, which are the billions of dollars spent
But that's not what you originally said. You said, quote: "because cigarette smoking is still the leading cause of disease and death."
Those aren't even the same two things. Which means I was correct when I speculated that you don't know the difference between "cause" and "contributor" (or, if you prefer, "mortality" and "morbidity"). Don't take it personally - most people, it turns out, aren't smart enough to recognize the distinction (COVID proved that in spades).
You've essentially pivoted your argument completely from "Smoking should be sin taxed because it kills people" to "Smoking should be sin taxed because treating smokers is costly."
The problem with that - I'm sure you know - is the latter isn't a problem with smoking, it's a problem with taxpayer-based public health care. And your argument should be against that instead; smokers - like anyone else with any malady of any kind - should be 100% financially responsible for their own health care. That solves your "external costs" issue completely.
(Also, there was no ad hominem there either. Just saying.)
And unlike government bans of illegal drugs, cigarette smokers and cigarette sellers were NEVER arrested or incarcerated.
Would you have preferred them to be? If so, why?
(Also, if you want to go down the tangent of why smoking - and drinking, for that matter - are a false comparison to drug use, we can. You've already, perhaps inadvertently, illustrated why.)
I am old enough to remember when these work at home scam sites used to promise only $500 / week.
Is anyone at reason monitoring these comments and tracking the year to year inflation rates of how much you can earn a week working from home againt the core inflation rate?