A Florida Cop Gets Into a Shootout With an Acorn, Emptying His Gun Into His Own Patrol Car
Deputy Jesse Hernandez, whose bullets miraculously missed the handcuffed suspect in the car, resigned during an investigation that found he "violated policy."

A falling acorn prompted a Florida sheriff's deputy to empty his pistol into his own patrol car, where a handcuffed suspect was sitting at the time. Another deputy also fired at the car. Amazingly, neither the suspect nor anyone else was injured. The bizarre incident, which happened on November 12 in Fort Walton Beach, led to the resignation of Deputy Jesse Hernandez three weeks later, the Okaloosa County Sheriff's Office revealed on Friday.
Hernandez, who had been a deputy since January 2022, and his partner, Sgt. Beth Roberts, were responding to two service calls. The first, received at 8:42 a.m., involved "a vehicle driving around honking its horn and disrupting the peace since 3 a.m.," the sheriff's office said. The second call was from a woman who said her 22-year-old boyfriend, Marquis Jackson, had stolen her car and "had been calling and texting her threats." She "provided text messages she said had been taken from inside her vehicle showing what appeared to be a firearm suppressor pointing at the dash of the victim's vehicle."
Jackson, who showed up at the scene on McLaren Circle around 9:09 a.m., "was detained, searched, handcuffed, and placed in the rear of Deputy Hernandez's patrol vehicle while the investigation continued" and "the victim completed the affidavit for the stolen vehicle." She "told deputies Jackson had a silencer" but "she was not sure where it was" and added that he "had more than one weapon." Meanwhile, "other deputies found the victim's vehicle at 1656 Hunt Club Street."
Body camera video shows what happened next. Hernandez is walking back toward his patrol car when he exclaims, "Shots fired! Shots fired! Shots fired!" He rolls, runs away from his car, turns, and fires 17 rounds into the vehicle, emptying his magazine. While he is firing the last few rounds, he shouts, "I'm hit! I'm hit!" Later he says, "I'm good, but I feel weird." Then he speculates that "it might have hit my vest" and asks another officer, "Dude, am I hit?"
Hernandez was not hit, because no shots were fired until he began shooting at the patrol car where Jackson was sitting. After "witnessing Deputy Hernandez's response and reaction and fearing for his life," the sheriff's office says, Roberts "responded with gunshots towards the car as well in response to the perceived threat."
That's a lot of responding. To what, exactly? The sheriff's office says Hernandez "heard a pop sound which he perceived to be a gunshot." It adds that "the audible sound Deputy Hernandez reported can be heard on body cam video" (not by me!) and that "witnesses also attested they heard the sound they thought could have been a muffled gunshot." During the ensuing investigation, Vice News reports, Hernandez was shown "frame-by-frame footage" in which an acorn can be seen hitting the patrol car, which was parked near an oak tree. "Acorn?" Hernandez asked. "Acorn," an investigator replied.
"Immediately we began working diligently to determine the complete sequence of events and facts surrounding what transpired," Sheriff Eric Aden said. "Deputy Hernandez resigned during the course of our investigation but was ultimately found to have violated policy" because his use of deadly force was not "objectively reasonable." The internal investigation "also led to the determination" that Roberts' "use of deadly force was objectively reasonable," and "she was exonerated." A review by the 1st Judicial Circuit State Attorney's Office found "no probable cause for criminal charges" against either deputy.
Aden said he is "limited in further response due to pending litigation." But he added: "We understand this situation was traumatic for Mr. Jackson and all involved and have incorporated this officer involved shooting…into our training to try to ensure nothing similar happens again. We are very thankful Mr. Jackson wasn't injured and we have no reason to think former Deputy Hernandez acted with any malice. Though his actions were ultimately not warranted, we do believe he felt his life was in immediate peril and his response was based off the totality of circumstances surrounding this fear. Just as we have an obligation to protect our officers so they can go home safely to their families, law enforcement has the same obligation to any citizen being investigated for a crime."
If Hernandez's actions "were ultimately not warranted," of course, he cannot take refuge in "the totality of circumstances." Those circumstances included a suspect who had already been repeatedly searched and taken into custody. Yet the pop of a falling acorn was all it took to convince Hernandez that Jackson had somehow managed to conceal a handgun equipped with a silencer, then retrieve and fire it, all while handcuffed and restrained by a seat belt in the back of a police car.
In a Facebook post, Jackson claims he "had not done anything wrong" when he was approached by the deputies. "They never told me anything," he writes. "I decided to cooperate and just follow demands….I was searched multiple times, then unlawfully handcuffed and placed into the backseat of the cop car while being strapped down by the seatbelts."
When the shooting started, Jackson says, "All I could do was lean over and play dead to prevent getting shot in the head. I was scared to death and I knew all I could depend on was God! I ignored everything and prayed! Windows were shattering on me the whole time as bullets continued flying across me. I was blessed not to get hit by any bullets or get hurt physically but mentally, I'm not ok. I haven't been the same since and I don't think this feeling I have will ever change. I truly believe I'm damaged for life!"
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
FWIW, he also missed the acorn.
That acorn was a bad seed.
If he hadn't taken action the dogwood have got him.
That oak tree was coming right at him!
The whole thing was nuts.
I would just leaf if I saw the cops roll up.
Pretty squirrely cop.
Hey!!! I do NOT cop to that!
(So therefor I resemble that remark!!!)
So plucky Squirrell denies dropping the acorn?
In his defense, that particular acorn did fall pretty far from the tree.
It came from a bad branch of the family.
Though his actions were ultimately not warranted, we do believe he felt his life was in immediate peril and his response was based off the totality of circumstances surrounding this fear.
Over an acorn hitting his car? It's not like there was an angry mob breaking down barricades.
Because that's when you're supposed to pull out your gun and start shooting. Also, a mob of eighteen people of whom six were cops who were just standing there watching and not being assaulted.
Hey, in LA when there was a cop shooter on the loose, just driving around with your lights off at 5 AM to deliver newspapers was enough to make cops fear for their lives.
I truly believe I'm damaged for life!
I agree but we may have a disagreement on when that damage first occurred.
So we now need to outlaw sound suppressors that sound like acorns?
Assault acorns.
Just lucky it wasn't a chestnut.
Or a black walnut. Black nuts matter riots!
I didn't know that Plants Vs. Zombies was real. Nor that Cop Zombies had guns.
Great way to do this by checking https://www.fredykia.com/search/used-houston-tx/?cy=77034&pr=0:8990&tp=used
I wanna know what brand car that was! Two cops mag dump into it and the person inside survives . . . I want me some of that!!
Oh, I gotta wonder where did all those bullets go, and I think that maybe it's the cops that should be limited to 10 round mags. With all the superior skill and training beyond us mere civilians on display in this incident, it is obvious they can't be trusted with full clipazines.
Well, this was foreseen when we took away their batons.
Now, imagine if they weren't cops but a pair of concealed carry permit folks who unloaded into their own car with someone sitting in the back seat.
Anyone who opens fire on an acorn should be demoted to desk duty and not allowed near weapons.
Ten is way too many. Barney here should only have one.
American Cops are some of the most poorly trained shooters in the world. Cop does a mag dump at what? Where was his target? When did he reassess the situation? Back when cops carried six shot revolvers they were trained to fire three shots and then reassess. Perhaps going back to that might be a good idea, as they are trained to mag dump then assess. This current training seems to put the public at unnecessary risk.
I agree with you, but can you train a guy that thinks he was shot during the shootout with an acorn? He should not be assessing or reassessing anything having to do with a gun or police work and filtering out these type of people should also be part of the training.
Cop does a mag dump at what? Where was his target? When did he reassess the situation?
*Both* Cops. That’s what blows my mind and I’ve made this point before. Even for military CQB drills everyone doesn’t just go full mad minute every time a car backfires. There are designated shooters and fields of fire established. Opening up because the guy next to starts lighting things up pretty much just guarantees (in the ‘pushes the odds closer to 1 every time’ sense) you *won’t* hit anything of tactical importance and *will* hit something of value, tactical or otherwise, that shouldn’t be shot.
This calls for a ban on assault oaks that can fire more that ten acorns
No one needs more than ten acorns.
Except maybe the Reason squirrels.
Thirty four rounds (seventeen rounds per gun) and no hits. Obviously they need more range time. I'm not the best pistol shot but I can consistently put all 17 rounds from my SigSauer M-17 into the silhouette off hand at 25 meters but consider I need more practice because my group sucks and only about half end up in the ten circle. Much better with a rifle (with my AR I can pretty much consistently shoot a three shot group under a dime size and my last deer was just over three hundred yards and went right through the x ring, took out the aorta and both lungs).
Ever do that well when the tree is shooting back?
This is the correct question. I shoot a G-22 pretty damn good from a variety of distances and positions. Same with a 1911. But I've never had my targets shooting back at me.
It’s difficult to survive an acorn assault.
Neither did this cop.
Disagree. Not to downplay the bravery of soldiers in combat but, pragmatically, the issue has been largely demonstrated to be between completely psychological and bullshit.
You can take a bunch of high speed operators and their high speed gear and put them side-by-side with novices, skilled non-combatants, and olympic shooters and, as (kinda) demonstrated by the article, wind up with people with lots of combat experience under performing people who are relatively untrained but following instructions and stepping through the motions deliberately. See Elisjsha Dicken, Kyle Rittenhouse, etc.
To be more clear, if you can put 8/10 rounds in the A-zone from 40m in practice and can't do it while being shot at, you probably have trouble removing things from your pocket and dropping to cover while being shot at too and skill/precision's got nothing to do with it. Again, not to impugn anyone, if you're in the middle of a football field, cover *or* concealment while taking fire can be a difficult problem to solve.
Not to shit on Rittenhouse, but he didn't fire on anyone who wasn't point blank. And that's to his credit, really, he didn't overreact and open fire on everyone who was chasing him or throwing things at him. But it's an example of good reflexes, I'd say, and not marksmanship under pressure.
Not to shit on Rittenhouse, but he didn’t fire on anyone who wasn’t point blank.
Fair. I was thinking that he displayed a manual of arms that (shouldn't have been required, insert FA/AR hate here, and) probably saved his life and that I've seen trained pros loose their shit over at the range. Again, not that the pros would get pissed and lose their shit in combat but the malfunction was enough to throw them off their civilian game but, seemingly, not enough to throw Kyle off his life-or-death self-defense.
If nothing prepared you for shooting, copious amounts of dry-fire and manual of arms wouldn't be demonstrated to improve live-fire performance. If no amount of live-fire performance translated to combat performance, we wouldn't perform any live-fire or dry-fire drills.
Slap
Pull
Observe
Release
Tap
Squeeze.
Though I guess the Army has changed this slightly. But this was the way I was trained. Slap the magazine up
Pull the charging handle
Observe the firing chamber and the ejected round
Release the charging handle
Tap the forward assist three times
Squeeze the trigger. Should be performed in under 3 seconds.
You're using examples of "untrained" people who won their fights. How many people lost gun fights because they froze, shot poorly, didn't get cover, failed to clear a stove pipe, etc?
These poor bastards did not receive any press because they failed. Rittenhouse and Dicken are glorified because success in these situations is rare.
How many people lost gun fights because they froze, shot poorly, didn’t get cover, failed to clear a stove pipe, etc?
This is getting into the weeds a bit.
The FBI published data on mass shootings from 2000-2013. The majority of the time, the shooter self-deleted before anyone could do anything. You could say the victims didn’t find cover quick enough or you could acknowledge that no amount of training was going to save them.
13% of the time unarmed civilians stopped the shooter. Like when Jared Loughner failed to clear a stovepipe and a civilian hit him with a folding chair. Do we chalk that up as a plus for combat folding chair training or just ascribe it as a fluke? What about the other 20 unarmed incidents?
If we chalk all of them up as varying flukes, where does that leave the 7 or so incidents where armed civilians and/or off-duty officers shot their way to a solution fall? Not flukes because a gun was used? Flukes when it was civilians but not when it was cops? Otherwise, doesn’t that mean about half the 28% of times cops stopped someone it was also just a fluke?
Bottom line, top shelf training is no guarantee of success nor against failure but being *completely* unprepared certainly doesn’t make things better. And ideas like “A lack of accuracy, even under fire, can be more than made up for with paranoia/situational awareness, other physical and/or mental preparedness, and/or manual of arms.” are by no means some entirely crazy notion.
It’s funny you use the term “poor bastard” my son’s Middle School FB coach was ex-SWAT. He had a tale about a guy on one force they called “Iceman”. Iceman had a habit of policing his brass at the range until one day, he got into a gunfight and lost. Investigators at the scene found double-strikes on the rounds in the cylinder and live rounds in his pocket and were unable to determine whether he had just got caught and continued to pull the trigger on an empty weapon or if he’d accidentally loaded the gun with spent brass.
Neither did these cops.
You train as you fight,fight as you train. Fact is, most people (myself included) don't spend enough time on the range and when they do go they don't practice under conditions they'll actually encounter. Police forces are infamous for ignoring basic marksmanship. And since they weren't actually being shot at, 34 rounds downrange without a single hit? That's pretty pisspoor shooting.
What exactly would count as a hit here? You could make an argument that since they were shooting at nothing every round was a hit.
For the record, that's mostly joking. Firing even one round without a clear target suggests very poor judgment. Doing a spray 'n' pray mag dump is hard to justify even when you have an actual target.
Thirty four rounds and they didn't get a single hit on the acorn!
I can understand why the one cop didn't hit the "suspect" since he was shooting at the back of the patrol car and those things are stuffed full of gear that the bullets never went past. i don't know where the other cop was shooting from and to where. i hope they count all the bullets to make sure they aren't in some else house or car
A cop panicked. Again. Okaloosa County's finest, I'm sure. Lucky no one was hurt. But sounds like the original perp is gonna get him some green.
He'll probably get the bill for the damage to the vehicle.
To "Its_Not_Inevitable";
The man that porkey was using for target practice was NOT a "perp".
His Hog Calling Girlfriend was mad at him so she called for porkey to come murder him for her. He was a victim.
Something somewhat similar happened in my town. It turned out that the pig was porking the man's girlfriend.
Something more similar and worse happened here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Jeremy_Mardis - where a six year old child was murdered by a pig that couldn't keep it in his pants.
I still don't understand Reason's hate toward the police. They have always been Police bad, defund them. Notice they don't talk about the looting, I mean helping stores with inventory or cars jackings.
There are 708,001 full time police officers in the US. Of course, they are going to screw up. Hell, with people, I'm surprised it's not more.
Reason - hate cops, open borders, free drugs for all, and go Biden
Ah, yes. But where, exactly, do we want Biden to go?
That is the real question.
Reason doesn't hate all cops - Reason just hates the bad cops.
If the police department actually policed itself, the occasional screw-up would be accepted. But when it's covered up, hushed up, ignored or worse, endorsed, the cops on the sidelines are making themselves part of the problem.
So to the case above, who arrested Hernandez for flagrant violation of gun safety and probably a dozen different state and federal laws? Why did Roberts start shooting with no clear target or reason other than that Hernandez was going insane? How the hell does any reasonable cop say with a straight face that Roberts' "use of deadly force was objectively reasonable"?
This is not just one cop gone nuts - this case is evidence of an entire department in crisis. If that doesn't worry you, it should.
If the police department actually policed itself,
The police DO police themselves. There are millions of cop/civilian interactions every year. Millions. And maybe a hundred serious screwups every year.
In the year George Floyd died there were 9 questionable shootings of unarmed men. 9 --out of millions.
That's a better record that Reason's record for accurate journalism.
Do you read the articles here at all? There are hundreds of serious screwups per year documented just on Reason. Also documented is the atrocious state of data collection which means that we have no idea how bad the real problem is. But just given the number of jurisdictions that are being investigated by the feds, we know that the number of bad interactions is a whole lot higher than mere hundreds.
You didn't cite your source for "9 questionable shootings" in the year George Floyd died but that seems implausible. I will note, however, that you invalidly qualified it to "shootings of unarmed men", a restriction that excludes cases like Philando Castile. The victim being armed does not automatically make the shooting any less "questionable".
If they do read the articles, I'm pretty sure they're getting the special Bizarro World edition. The articles they're commenting on don't bear much resemblance to the ones I'm reading. I honestly don't know why a lot of the commenters even bother visiting the site unless they just really enjoy celebrating Shit on Reason Day. (Spoiler: every day is Shit on Reason Day.)
Let's say that was you and a buddy who just unloaded pistols into your car with some poor fucker in the backseat.
What do you think would happen to you?
I was wondering how someone was going to make it about Biden. You stretched and pulled, and it was a real workout, but you did it.
The cop unloaded an entire mag because he heard an acorn and the other cop joined in. Both got off mostly scott free. That is why there is hate on cops.
West Point Grad. 10 years military service and deployed overseas but no combat duty. This has the look and feel of affirmative action all over it.
So much for using the web to research.
From what I suspect is A.I. (at the top of the results, no reference link):
The average Okaloosa County Sheriff salary ranges from approximately $62,046 per year for a Deputy Sheriff to $62,046 per year for a Deputy Sheriff. The average Okaloosa County Sheriff hourly pay ranges from approximately $30 per hour for a Deputy Sheriff to $30 per hour for a Deputy Sheriff.
From indeed.com:
Average Okaloosa County Sheriff's Office Deputy Sheriff yearly pay in Florida is approximately $49,127, which meets the national average.
From zip recruiter:
As of Feb 7, 2024, the average annual pay for a Sheriff Deputy in Okaloosa County is $59,294 a year.
On the other hand, if you want to hire one of these security experts, the county web site has this:
Rates
All details have a $2.00 per hour administrative fee and will be billed at a 4-hour minimum regardless of the need. The following rates apply:
Tier 1 – $37.00 per hour plus administrative fee.
Tier 2 – $47.00 per hour plus administrative fee.
Tier 3 (Holiday) – $52.00 per hour plus administrative fee.
Tier 4 – State Contract or Negotiated Rate. Must speak directly with the Professional Compliance Inspector for approval.
Note: Events requiring five (5) or more deputies will require a supervisor. The supervisor’s rate of pay is higher depending on the number of deputies on the detail.
An 8% management/convenience fee is charged by the vendor (RollKall).
Yet another trigger happy cop. Shoot first. Think only after the investigators have reviewed the video.
One guy driving around for hours honking his horn. Another guy steals his girlfriend's car. Another one uses deadly force against an acorn. There has to be a Florida Man joke in there somewhere.
Sounds more like Chicken Little decided to go into law enforcement.
Gaear;
More like a pig joke.
Fortunately, in my county (Contra Costa County California); the deputies don't just start blasting away till they run out of ammo. Fortunately for the criminals anyway.
Instead, when confronted with a methhead party - turned 30 thug riot that has attacked a senior citizen - the useless chicken pig boy and sow girl with a badge just turn tail and run. That way no one downrange is in danger of their poor marksmanship. BTW: the meth heads had AT LEAST 74 complaints and Porkey was afraid to do anything every single time. That "at least" is because if a report is made by neighbors that border the party palace over it's back fence, and they don't know the address, or someone reports by the cross street intersection, or if one of their vicious dogs are reported while roaming the neighborhood looking for someone to bite; the useless tarded porkers won't identify the house even though it's right there in the complaint.
We'd be safer if there were no pigs and we could handle the criminals ourselves.
The dude in the car was lucky that it wasn't a chestnut that fell.
Great point!
If he missed the acorn, then fire him immediately. If he actually hit the acorn, then give him a commendation.
The REAL issue is the FALSE and actually unproven claim by the GF that the man was ARMED and DANGEROUS. In fact, failure to find any arms on the man (arms being legal to carry for any nom-felon either way) the GF should be ARRESTED for causing the incident altogether.
People do not understand the MIND SET of any police officer when they are told that someone who is being ACCUSED of something is even KNOWN to carry arms or even OWN THEM. This changes everything and officers are much more likely to respond with FORCE up to and including DEADLY FORCE. Arrest HER for causing this since there was no weapon found.
If the useless chicken pigs DON'T know what kind of firearms you have; they will be less likely to bust down your door, "feel threatened", and murder you.
You can give Florida Man a badge but he’s still Florida Man.
You go to the acorn wars with the squirrels you've got.
Few points:
1. The first officer was allowed to resign without any further consequences or charges.
2. He thought he was shot and somehow did not know he was not shot until he was at the hospital.
3. The other cop was completely cleared because if one cop is shooting, no matter how unjustified, is by itself justification for any other cops to shoot. Had the suspect been killed or injured by one of the bullets from the second cop, he would have gotten nothing.
'The internal investigation "also led to the determination" that Roberts' "use of deadly force was objectively reasonable," and "she was exonerated." '
How is firing 17 rounds at an unseen target "reasonable"? Or if she was shooting at the guy in the backseat and missed 17 times, is that "reasonable"? I hope that guy wins $10 million in a lawsuit after the jury hears what this Sheriff Department considers "reasonable". I hope this is introduced in evidence at every lawsuit against the department until the sheriff and all other supervisors have been replaced and the policies completely rewritten.
Markum23; Everything you wrote is reasonable.
Just wow. So, he heard an acorn ... but why did he say he was hit ? And what's with the ground-rolls ? If this wasn't so serious where a man was almost killed, I would laugh at such a parody of behavior.
Liberty_Belle; Yes. Completely.
Acorn: 1
Cop: 0
If Hernandez’s actions “were ultimately not warranted,” of course, he cannot take refuge in “the totality of circumstances.”
Sure he can. But in doing so, he revealed his lack of qualification for the job. And he resigned, appropriately.
I mean, it’s a facepalm of a story – to be sure. Somehow this guy made it to the street without having learned from the academy how to best mitigate fear and keep cool under pressure (whether real or perceived) to avoid precisely this kind of overreaction. But he clearly realized it about himself, and willingly surrendered his badge immediately. I don't see any indication in this article of him rationalizing his actions or wanting to stay on the force, so....
This is about as unobjectionable as it gets. So… why doesn’t Jacob seem to feel satisfied at the result?
I was thinking:
This is the consequence of hiring low intelligence pigs. But then I realized that if either the pig OR the sow had even as high as an IQ of 90; one of those bloodthirsty retards would have remembered exactly where they strapped-down the searched and handcuffed "suspect". A stupid pig is a good pig in this case.
BTW: Did you catch the Pig-Tards screaming orders at people? Hilarious.
A five year old could have done better.
Was there lipstick on the female pig?
I can't watch this without thinking " PARKOUR ! ". lol.
I suspect that cop's wife learned very quickly not to make popcorn at home.
Sullum is a reliable reporter, but lost me with this part: "use of deadly force was not "objectively reasonable."" Since when do reason and objectivity figure into what Florida cops do? For starters, their lawMAKERS are nutty as fruitcakes!