Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Inflation

Elizabeth Warren's 'Shrinkflation' Rant Is an Incredible Exercise in Blame-Shifting

The Massachusetts senator blames corporate greed for price increases that were caused by inflationary federal spending she supported.

Christian Britschgi | 2.7.2024 12:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Elizabeth Warren | Michael Brochstein/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom
(Michael Brochstein/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom)

Do you hate it when the big bag of chips you bought turns out to contain mostly air inside? Well, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D–Mass.) does, and she's crusading to end this injustice.

In a series of tweets and videos over the past few days, Warren has come out swinging against the "shrinkflation" of Doritos, Oreos, and other store-bought products whose sizes have shrunk even as their prices remain the same.

Fewer Doritos in your bag.
Fewer Oreos in your box.
Less toilet paper on your roll.

You aren't imagining it—big corporations really are making you pay the same amount (sometimes more) for less. It's called "shrinkflation," and we've got to crack down on it.

— Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) February 6, 2024

"These big corporations are shrinking how much they give us, but they're charging the same amount or sometimes even more. Corporate executives thought we wouldn't notice, but they're wrong," said Warren in a video posted to X (formerly known as Twitter) earlier this week.

From Doritos to Oreos to toilet paper, giant corporations are shrinking how much they give but charging the same price or more. We're not fooled.
 
Corporations are boosting their profits with these tricks.
 
It's time to crack down on shrinkflation and corporate greed. pic.twitter.com/AefmKWAvZu

— Elizabeth Warren (@SenWarren) February 4, 2024

Another word for shrinkflation is an obscure concept economists call "inflation"—where general price increases erode the purchasing power of consumers' dollars. Inflation can appear when the price of a same-sized bag of chips increases, and when the size of a same-priced bag of chips decreases. Both phenomena are still just the per-unit cost of a good increasing.

Warren's rant about shrinking Oreo packages is just the senator's way of adding a conspiratorial gloss to the painfully obvious effects of decades-high inflation the country's lived through during and after the pandemic.

But one doesn't need conspiracy theories to explain recent inflation. The federal government's $4 trillion in fiscal stimulus during the pandemic put a lot of cash in people's hands right as production was falling. The inevitable result of more money chasing fewer goods is higher inflation.

The Biden administration and a Democratic Congress made things even worse by passing a $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan in March 2021, when an economic recovery was already underway.

Warren supported all these massive spending bills and at times even advocated for more generous spending on things like rent subsidies. If the senator is looking for someone to blame for shrinking cookie packages, she need only look in the mirror.

She's opted to look into a camera instead to blame "shrinkflation" on the greed of corporate executives who've increased their profits faster than the rate of inflation.

"We're not fooled. These giant corporations are inflating their profits and leaving us with the crumbs. Literally," says Warren in her video.

This is remarkable, if facially convincing, blame-shifting. It's true that corporate profit increases outpaced consumer inflation early in the pandemic.

That's not because they discovered a magical ability to get consumers to spend more for less. Rather, those increased profits are also a product of policies Warren supported. Corporations raised their prices in anticipation of rising production costs. Government stimulus gave consumers a lot more money to spend on their products. Naturally, they made more money for a time.

The cause-and-effect Warren traces between smaller snack packages and higher corporate profits are really just two effects of inflationary spending policies the senator supported.

Warren has called for a "crackdown" on corporate greed, although she doesn't elaborate on what exactly that might look like. Perhaps she wants quotas of Oreos per package?

While the senator is posing as a hawk on "shrinkflation," she's called on the Federal Reserve to slash interest rates, another policy that would in all likelihood increase inflation and corporate profits.

As it stands, the rate of inflation is cooling. Corporate profits are also falling as higher production costs have caught up with their higher prices.

This doesn't mean prices will decline to pre-pandemic levels. The increased air in Doritos bags is here to stay. Consumers might rightly feel some anger when their chip bag comes to a premature end. If they're looking for someone to blame, they'd be wise to point an orange, crumb-crusted finger at Warren's inflationary agenda and not the corporate executives who made their snack.

Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: AI Versus Age-Verification Laws

Christian Britschgi is a reporter at Reason.

InflationElizabeth WarrenGovernment SpendingCoronavirusCorporationsEconomicsCongressFederal government
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (186)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Minadin   1 year ago

    Her entire career is an extended exercise in blame-shifting.

    She started out as a bankruptcy lawyer.

    1. middlefinger   1 year ago

      To be fair, I don’t think the leftist Democrats believe that spending/printing causes inflation. Lately, every post or interview I’ve read calls for the exact same spending as Covid. They believe Democrat voters were doing great during Covid (an illusion based on decreasing purchasing power & Fed non calculation of Shrinkflation.)

      Throw in the corporate addiction to leverage/debt zero interest rates and all of this was the perfect storm. My COL is up 25 percent since diaper man took office.

      1. MrMxyzptlk   1 year ago (edited)

        They have to believe a dozen impossible things before breakfast. One is the triple martini next to the roasted heart of a child is a normal breakfast in America.

    2. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

      Lawyers should be barred from all elected office.

    3. Bruce D   1 year ago

      In any inflation scenario, prices, and therefore profits, get bid up before costs. When new money or credit is introduced into the economy, the prices of consumer or finished goods are bid up first, before the costs of raw materials, which increases profits since underlying raw materials and labor costs have yet to be bid up.. After the prices of finished or consumer goods have been bid up, producers then have more money to then compete for raw and underlying materials and labor. Then, underlying costs - raw materials and labor costs - are then bid up thereby reducing profits back down to the original margins. So, yeah, prices and thereby profits are bid up first. Then when inflation filters down to underlying costs and capital goods, profits are reduced back to previous percentage levels.

      1. Bruce D   1 year ago (edited)

        Anything bought on credit gets bid up first. Companies can expand via borrowing more easily, without dipping into profits. Capital goods and real estate then get bid up, refecting itself in higher stock and real estate prices, which means profits and stock prices go up. Since wages are a cost to the producer, they won’t increase until the money filters down and producers use it to compete for labor. In my estimation that’s why wages always tend to lag. Inflation hurts the workers more than it does the capitalists, whose asset prices become inflated.

    4. diver64   1 year ago

      That midwit must have been feeling ignored with all the limelight on the Hamas Squad. It seems that, like Biden and Dem Big City Mayors, every time she opens her mouth we are treated with garbled nonsense showing how uninformed and silly she is.

  2. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

    Just buy your Cheesy-Poofs in bulk at Costco.

    Food inflation problem solved.

    Squaw should go back to her bank bashing.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      Even those are not immune to shrinkflation.

      1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

        Even those are not immune to shrinkflation.

        THEY WERE IN THE POOL!!!

        1. VULGAR MADMAN   1 year ago

          She definitely makes me shrink.

          1. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

            Her voice is certainly boner kryptonite.

          2. RobRBarron   1 year ago

            As if you needed the help, needledick...

    2. Senater Tim Scott   1 year ago

      Mr. Shrike:

      Are you going to publish more phony bullshit about the Venezuelan style collapse of the Biden Kommunist Koncentration Kamp of America? I mean, next up, you’ll probably tell us that if you parked a million dollars last year in an index fund you made more money than most lawyers. Ridiculous!

      You wanted to get to know me better yesterday so I told you the truth. I’m a.) a Black man who b.) is the junior Senater from South Carolina who also is c.) engaged and d.) has a girlfriend that I see in summer camp in Canada every year. So, can I ask you the obvious? How high up on the org chart are you at the Lord Snorzos Company anyway? No one can actually be not getting paid for your propaganda.

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

        TIMMEH!

        1. Sevo   1 year ago

          turd lies. That's not a surprise to anyone who reads his constant stream of bullshit.
          But it's becoming obvious that as Misek is too stupid to understand the concepts of "evidence" or "relevance", the concept of "honesty" is simply beyond turd's ken

      2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

        In which SPB engages in his Tim Scott fantasies on a public comment forum.

    3. One-Punch_Man   1 year ago

      Wait, there is a Dem you don't like.

      It's the end of times.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        Well, to be honest, Warren is a native fauxmerican, not black.

      2. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

        There is only a handful of DC critters I have any respect for.

        And the Squad is the worst. They all need to go.

        Just keep AOC around for that ass.

        1. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

          This, like all of spb's posts, is a lie.

          1. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

            He certainly supports their policies, which aren’t much different form Soros, whom he worships as his god.

        2. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

          At 34, she’s the equivalent of four 8 1/2 year olds.

        3. Sevo   1 year ago

          turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
          turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

    4. Sevo   1 year ago

      turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

  3. sarcasmic   1 year ago

    As it stands, the rate of inflation is cooling.

    Nuh uh. I've been told in these comments that doing from 8% down to 3.5% is the path to triple digit inflation.

    1. Minadin   1 year ago

      You've literally never been told that.

    2. Mickey Rat   1 year ago (edited)

      Oh goody. We are doing 90 in a 30 mph zone and still picking up speed, but at least we don’t have the accelerator on the floor anymore!

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        I told him the same a week ago, and he came up with the triple-digit inflation shit.

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago (edited)

          It is amusing how he spends all morning screaming liar at everyone as he openly lies and creates strawmen in every thread critical of a Democrat.

          1. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

            Do you ever wonder if he gets beaten up a lot when he gets shitfaced and runs his mouth in public? I doubt he has any teeth left.

        2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

          Then clarify what you mean. Without any personal jibes.

          1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

            "Without any personal jibes?"

            Go ahead. You first.

          2. Outlaw Josey Wales   1 year ago

            To Jibe with something is to agree. Unless you are sailing.

            Starting with a personal stab at some commenters and not expecting a personal response seems like a fool's errand.

        3. sarcasmic   1 year ago

          Or are you going to stand back and throw insults at me for being critical of something you refuse to reiterate or explain.

          I'm thinking door number two.

          1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

            “Without any personal jibes?”

            1. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

              Isn't jibe a nautical term?

          2. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

            No one gives a fuck what you think drunky. You’re just some piece of shit that shows up to rage about Trump and flail at anyone who criticizes your precious democrats.

            Just crawl into your bottle and die already. It’s going to happen sooner or later anyway. Just let go.

      2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

        We're not picking up speed. 3.5% is less than 8%. It's still more than the Fed's target of 2%, but a lot less than the aftermath of all that sudden COVID emergency spending that was signed into law by two presidents.

        1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

          No fair using numbers to make your point.

          Name calling is what they understand.

        2. Minadin   1 year ago

          If your acceleration is positive, you're gaining speed. If we're still comparing inflation to acceleration.

          1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

            I still don't understand the comparisons to Argentina's triple digit inflation.

          2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

            If inflation is acceleration, what is velocity? The value of the dollar?

          3. Randy Sax   1 year ago

            position = amount of money in the market = x
            velocity = change in the amount of money in the market over time
            acceleration = change in velocity over time

            X1 = X0 + Vt + 1/2a(t^2)

            1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

              I was going to compare inflation to compound interest. Only in reverse.

              Still doesn't explain why certain people are claiming our current inflation is leading us to become the next Argentina.

              1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

                “Without any personal jibes?”

                1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                  So you can't explain their reasoning either?

                  1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

                    By your own standards, that's a personal jibe.

                    “Without any personal jibes?”

              2. middlefinger   1 year ago

                Use California as an analogy. Sure, the FAANG stocks, Entertainment industries, climate, outdoor activities are desirable wealth creation powerhouses that are now the world’s 4th or 5th largest economy.

                Now adjust the state for COLA, Cost of living adjustments, they have the highest poverty levels in the U.S. Since we’re discussing Shrinkflation, some Fed worshipping economists might say, well rents have come down five percent. What have the rents come down per square foot. Shrinkflation is about yield.

                1. middlefinger   1 year ago (edited)

                  “Climate smart American made” green new deal fertilizers might be affecting yields? I know potatoes are up 300 percent. Could be the fossil fuels thing.

                  https://www.usda.gov/media/press-releases/2023/03/10/usda-announces-29-million-increase-american-made-fertilizer

                2. B G   1 year ago

                  Rents came down 5% because almost that portion of the State's population fled to other states at a time when the Pandemic closure of the southern border also created a severe restriction on the inflow of illegal immigrants to take their place (as it had been in the span from 1995-2019 when net migration of taxpayers was outbound from the State in every single year but the total population continued to increase). The exodus of people needing housing, combined with the Newsom regime's Covid response destroying the tourism traffic which made keeping a portion of housing supply off the market as air-bnb or other short-term rental units helped to relieve a bit of the market pressure from the housing shortage that the local governments have been exacerbating in the major cities for multiple decades.

            2. One-Punch_Man   1 year ago

              Kinematic formula - is near and dear to my heart. Go Physics

            3. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

              Yep, exactly what I tried to tell Sarc last week. For some reason, he morphed it into triple-digit inflation when I mentioned that instead of heading toward the brick wall at 100 m/s2, we're heading toward it at 30 m/s2.

              1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                More like instead of heading towards that wall at 160$/t^2 we're heading there at 3.5$/t^2, or whatever the math is. Fed's target is 2%. I think 3.5 is a lot closer to 2 than to 160. But that's just me.

              2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                I think I understand what you're saying now. The inflated value of the dollar is the velocity while inflation is the acceleration.
                Could compare that to compound interest because that x% rate of inflation applies to what was inflated by y% the previous year.

                I still don't see how you're saying that's the path to Argentina.

                1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                  We've been over this all morning. Youre a moron.

            4. MrMxyzptlk   1 year ago

              Do you think the majority of democrats can do math?

              1. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

                Not really. Other than what they’re told by their elite masters.

              2. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

                1 amnisty bill +2 million voters to swing states = totalitarian control

            5. RobRBarron   1 year ago (edited)

              “position = amount of money in the market = x”

              WRONG

              That is money supply and it has various categories…M1…M2…M3 P*…

              “velocity = change in the amount of money in the market over time”

              WRONG

              Velocity is how many times a single dollar turns over in the economy…or to be more technical…how many times one unit of money supply is transacted for goods/services in the domestic economy over a specified period of time…

              “acceleration = change in velocity over time”

              Finally got one correct…

              “X1 = X0 + Vt + 1/2a(t^2)”

              That’s a physic equation…

              Current monetary velocity of M1 is around 1.55…which is very low historically…

        3. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

          "We’re not picking up speed. 3.5% is less than 8%."

          If you try thinking before you type, you won't have to try to backtrack shit like this later.

    3. JesseAz   1 year ago

      Fuck youre broken. And a moron.

      1. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

        I amuse myself by slapping him around. He’s too much of a pussy to push back. He appears to be obsessed with you though.

  4. But SkyNet is a Private Company   1 year ago

    And here I thought the problem was corporations foisting large portion sizes of unhealthy processed food on us. Make up your tiny mind

    1. n00bdragon   1 year ago (edited)

      I demand my Oreos to pack a hundred cookies in a box, cost a nickel, be healthier than celery, and be made from naturally grown Kobe beef in America like god intended.

      1. MrMxyzptlk   1 year ago

        Well, I suppose if you're going to have delusions you may as well go for the really satisfying ones.

    2. B G   1 year ago

      We need to get the unit prices of junk food back down so that people won't complain as loudly about the excise taxes on them which are supposedly intended to reduce consumption.

      If junk food gets more expensive due to something as "trivial" as the devaluation of pretty much every global currency at once, then people might consume less and the revenues from the taxes will go down. Without that tax revenue, the government won't be able to fund the PSA campaigns encouraging people to eat healithier and quit buying chips/cookies; the same model that's worked so well with "truthout" and tobacco taxes in CA.

      1. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

        La lot easier to simply implement my reparations program. Since idiot democrats voted for this malignant shit, let them pay. Don’t have enough money or stuff? Just take some off the nearest democrat. Democrats love reparations, so this should be cool with them.

        1. B G   1 year ago

          The old Democratic "base" might have cared about reparations.

          The new Dem base is the tech billionaires who would actually have to pay for it. So many "high earners" have moved out of CA since Newsom was elected that the State Govt estimates it's going to reduce State Income Tax revenues by $3.5Bil per year, and they're also losing revenue on sales/use tax, vehicle registration, and corprate income tax (in cases where the big dogs are taking their companies and jobs with them), and all the taxes they'd have collected from all the ancillary economic activity which is no longer happening in the State.

          If Gavin wants to make good on his promises of reparations (in a state where slavery was never allowed), he's going to have to try to hit up a lot more than 1% of the population, and the people who buy into the BS line that all their hardships are die to someone else's greed aren't about to agree to pick up the tab for a huge handout just because they're being told it's "justice" to hand over $Billions from people who never owned slaves to people who never were. Just like every other "progressive" policy initiative, it gets dramatically less popular when people learn that there's no workable way to make "the one percent of the one percent" pay for it all.

  5. SQRLSY One   1 year ago

    Flabby GrokPot is a favorite advice columnist of mine. Concerning Elizabeth Warren Jeffs Dahmer-Bezos-Epstein, I saw this below exchange just the udder day...

    Dear Flabby GrokPot,

    I don’t get it! HOW in the Sacred Name of Government Almighty can ANYONE bring themselves to vote for Elizabeth Warren Jeffs Dahmer-Bezos-Epstein?!? I mean, Elizabeth Warren can’t decide WHAT her personal pronoun is; That of a Native American, or that of a Skraeling! Warren Jeffs is a convicted polygamist and cultist sex offender, and the Jeffs Dahmer and Bezos and Epstein are or were, respectively, a berserk necrophiliac cannibalistic murderer, a greedy, filthy-rich capitalist, and a convicted sex offender! So just HOW could ANYONE vote for Elizabeth Warren Jeffs Dahmer-Bezos Epstein?!?

    -Dazed and Confused

    Dear Dazed and Confused,

    I’m dazed and confused ass well! However, I suspect that Elizabeth Warren Jeffs Dahmer-Bezos Epstein represents a bit of “all things to all people”! He-she-it-they-zey-zem is variously, precariously, and precociously an hemorrhoid ointment AND a floor wax, AND a dessert topping!!! ALL are delicious, butt some hemorrhoid ointments-cum-dessert toppings ARE more delicious than udders!!! Ass far ass it goes, about Elizabeth Warren Jeffs Dahmer-Bezos Epstein being a Skraeling, rumor has it that they-zey-zem have been seen Skraeling around with Bill Clinton, Monica Lewinsky, the Cat in the Hat, and Spermy Daniels, and many more, all at the same time! I don’t know if that’s true or not. Also, sorry, I don’t know if there’s video, or not! So please don’t bother to be “asking, for a friend”, because I already know that you’d REALLY be “asking, for a fiend!”

    - Flabby GrokPot

  6. Ajsloss   1 year ago

    Who brought this crackpot?

    1. SQRLSY One   1 year ago

      Who brought the Lizard People? Why is stuff and stuff so stuffy? Why not ask questions that the Lizard People, or maybe perhaps even the Mammal People, can make sense of?

  7. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

    ""Warren has called for a "crackdown" on corporate greed, although she doesn't elaborate on what exactly that might look like.""

    AG's suing on civil law grounds and receiving cash settlements.

    https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2023/attorney-general-james-takes-historic-action-against-pepsico-endangering

    1. Minadin   1 year ago

      It would probably look a lot like that 'independent' consumer protection racket agency she was trying to set up as her own personal fiefdom, without any sort of accountability to the Executive or to Congress, funding based entirely upon how much they could fine private businesses and citizens.

  8. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

    Elizabeth Warren, proving once more that she is an idiot, or thinks her voters are idiots.

    1. Minadin   1 year ago

      It's both, trust me.

      1. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

        Spending policies having long term negative co sequences? That's impossible! Her intentions were so sincere!

    2. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

      Lucky for her, most of her voters are, in fact, idiots.

    3. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago

      I know several ‘educated’ people who think she’s smart. So painful to listen to them gibber about her.

  9. Senater Tim Scott   1 year ago

    Great article Christian! Like you I can’t stand it when someone with a smelly vagina talks about corporate greed and CEOs lining their pocket. Part of that money goes to me, the Black junior Senater from South Carolina. Get your own fucking cash you racist White women from Massachusetts. White people always trying to keep the Black Man down.

    You know what else I hate? Liars like the S@P500 company who publish bullshit statistics like this…

    S&P 500
    INDEXSP: .INX
    Follow
    OverviewVideosCompare
    4,989.55 +35.32 (0.71%)!! [Cone on!]

    Liars. Everyone knows that America is in decline in the age of Biden’s Kommunist Koncentration Kamp of America. The S&P500 company must get its money from either the Gates or Lord Snorzos Company. They’re usually the ones behind these phony statistics.

    SELL!!! SELL!!! SELL!!!

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Haha! Spb forgot to change socks.

      1. Senater Tim Scott   1 year ago

        As Mr. Buttplug will tell you I’m not him. He thinks the Biden Crime Family in America’s Kommunist Koncentration Kamp is doing just fine. I don’t. I’ve invested heavily in BRICS currencies and nuclear fallout shelters. He doesn’t have a single Rupee to his name is my guess. What a sucker! SELL!!! SELL!!! SELL!!!

        1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

          TIMMEH!

        2. MrMxyzptlk   1 year ago

          We're advising all our clients to invest in canned food and shotguns.

    2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

      He thinks people buy this bullshit.

    3. Super Scary   1 year ago

      "Senater Tim Scott"

      Was "Senator Tim Scott" already taken or something? Or are you just trying to own it?

    4. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

      So you've escaped your gray box to spew your racist shit huh. Back you go.

  10. Eeyore   1 year ago

    You can still hate shrinkflation - even if it is your policies that caused it.

    1. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

      My guess, she didn't notice until she overheard the help complaining. She then admonished them for lollygagging by yelling arriba arribba andale andale!

      1. Eeyore   1 year ago

        Or she danced around talking in fake Apache while blabbering about peace and pipes.

  11. MWAocdoc   1 year ago (edited)

    “Incredible” – as in “unbelievable” which has somehow morphed into “amazing!” Of course, her “rant” is all three of the above: unbelievable and amazing – in the sense of “amazingly stupid for saying such tripe and hoping anyone would actually believe what xhe said.” Of course, xhe is not credible in ANY sense of the word.

  12. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

    Surprised she'd want more money going to the evil for profit insurance companies when they rake in the profits for diabetes treatments.

  13. Eeyore   1 year ago

    There is a lot less Warren in the bag than there used to be.

    1. Minadin   1 year ago

      Many moons ago, Warren was still an old bag.

    2. MrMxyzptlk   1 year ago

      She used to be a blivet. No, that's spelled right. Now she's running low on bullshit and that bag is saggin'.

  14. Longtobefree   1 year ago

    Bad news; I need all that evil corporate profit to continue.
    You see, it keeps the values in my 401k from falling.
    And yes, I will vote this November, if there is an election.

    1. defaultdotxbe   1 year ago

      People always seem to forget about their 401ks when they complain about "wall street" making money.

    2. MWAocdoc   1 year ago

      There WILL be an election, but it won't make any difference.

  15. Foo_dd   1 year ago

    another reason she is dumb for harping on shrinkflation...... it is one of the things that obscures just how bad inflation really was/is. i have never heard of them even trying to adjust for it in the CPI numbers..... they look at the cost for a box of granola bars, not the price per bar.

    i do think inflation is finally starting to cool, but the real world impact of the irresponsible money printing in the pandemic was much greater than those responsible for it (like warren) want us to really know.

    1. middlefinger   1 year ago

      It’s also in ingredients. For instance, my protein shake used to have 30grams per bottle, 6 pack, 12 oz bottles. Now, 20 grams per bottle, 6 pack, 12 oz bottles.

      Watered down flation.

  16. Its_Not_Inevitable   1 year ago

    "Elizabeth Warren's 'Shrinkflation' Rant Is an Incredible Exercise in Blame-Shifting"

    And stupidity.

  17. Bob T   1 year ago

    While I am of the opinion that Liz will never win the George Washington Cherry Tree Award, I am more amused to see what happens once the manufacturers get down to packaging one chip or cookie in a bag.

    1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

      what happens once the manufacturers get down to packaging one chip or cookie in a bag.

      HAPERINFLATION!

    2. Eeyore   1 year ago

      For cookies that already exists.

    3. MWAocdoc   1 year ago

      We already have that option! But it's a really REALLY big cookie!

  18. Eeyore   1 year ago

    8oz party size. They just fail to specify that it is a pity party for one.

  19. middlefinger   1 year ago

    Wait. Is reason promoting the right wing trumperism conspiracy theory that the Fed lies about inflation? If shrinkflation = inflation, then why are the inflation percentages, according to the feds, down?

    What a messy web the central planners weave.

    1. See.More   1 year ago

      .

      ... If shrinkflation = inflation, then why are the inflation percentages, according to the feds, down?

      I dunno... maybe 'cause the feds don't factor shrinkflation into their inflation calculation...

      1. middlefinger   1 year ago

        Correct answer! New question WHY?

  20. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

    Yeah, while "shrinkflation" is irritating, it is not something that requires Congressional action. Of course it is a bit of a sneaky way for a company to cut costs by giving customers less than what they think they are getting, hoping that they won't notice. And in some extreme case it might be a type of fraud, but fraud is already illegal. Like most demagogues she is just grandstanding on this issue to bash her perceived enemies.

    1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

      The raw costs are insignificant.

      They do it so the consumer buys more often. I worked in demand planning and costing systems for a huge software company.

    2. MWAocdoc   1 year ago (edited)

      If the customers can’t be bothered to read the “$ per unit” labels that every food retailer in America has been required to provide right their on the shelf next to the product, whose fault is that?! I don’t believe you can call what customers do when they shop thinking. But thank god for the Warrens who want to pretend they can protect customers from themselves!

  21. middlefinger   1 year ago (edited)

    Anyway. She’s right and wrong at the same time. She’s right about shrinkflation and wrong about corporations profiting with watered down game playing. Shrinkflation should be added to the official federal reserve central planning inflation calculations.

    Shrinkflation = inflation.

  22. One-Punch_Man   1 year ago

    Remember when old Lizzy...well old doesn't really narrow it down...but Lizzy was drinking that beer as a common person.

    Good times

    1. MrMxyzptlk   1 year ago

      I still cringe at that..

  23. Chip D   1 year ago

    Corporations are making record profits...not all of the high cost of things can be blamed on expenses

    1. Minadin   1 year ago

      As a percentage of margin or just in raw dollars?

      If the dollar is worth relatively less than if was previously, but the percentages in a particular business are otherwise unchanged, one would expect 'record profits', as reported by the stupid administration and legislators doing the spending and money printing causing the inflation, and the absolutely retarded and uncritical media that carries water for them.

      Think about this: If you started measuring your annual salary in pennies instead of dollars, that number would be a lot larger, right?

      1. EdG   1 year ago

        Corporate Profits Annual Increase
        2022 +9.8 %
        2021 +22.6 %

        1. Minadin   1 year ago

          So, of total dollars then, and not relative to margin? That appears to be the number you posted. Though, without any sort of context.

    2. TJJ2000   1 year ago

      They have to... Biden-inflation scaled the $ down (worthless) and profits had to reflect that to survive inflation.

      1. Miss Ann Thrope (She/It)   1 year ago

        Which means that thing you bought for 100 dollars a few years ago and sold on eBay yesterday for 150 inflated bucks is subject to income tax...

  24. EdG   1 year ago

    Interesting. The "federal government" is responsible for the $4 trillion in Covid spending that occured while Trump was president, but "President Biden" and "the Democratic Congress" are responsible for the $1.9 trillion in Covid spending that occured while Biden was president. Holy Bat Turds, Batman! One president is getting a free pass for spending more than twice as much as the other president!

    1. TJJ2000   1 year ago

      Who wrote the Cares Act as well as passed it unanimously?
      Who wrote the ARPA bill as well as passed it on party-lines?

      Trump only gets a free-pass because leftards keep trying to shift their fair share of blame. Which is MOSTLY their fault.

      And Biden and the Congress are on-spot to have a full term surmounting more debt than Trump even thought the pandemic is over. How do you explain that BS?

  25. Thoritsu   1 year ago (edited)

    No corporation is as greedy or uninhibited as the Government.

  26. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

    You know what else is shrinking? My will to live every time I see that old cunt's fugly mug.

    1. MakeOrwellFictionAgain   1 year ago

      That's a man, man!

      1. Fats of Fury   1 year ago

        That's a Mann, man. Mrs. Mann. She hasn't been Mrs. Warren since 1978.

  27. MakeOrwellFictionAgain   1 year ago

    All progressives are intractable ideologues and economic dyslexics -- a toxic cocktail of ego and ignorance.

  28. MakeOrwellFictionAgain   1 year ago

    I used to get 1/2 gallon of ice cream and now it's 1.5 quarts for about the same price. Biden did THAT!

    1. B G   1 year ago

      That all happened because of the inflation that was caused by the Fed dropping rates to 0% for the first time in the wake of the 90s stock/asset bubbles bursting.

      Breyers dropped from 64 to 56 oz in 2000, then to 48 oz in 2007.

      Considering the Fed has "printed" more money (tracked by expansion of the "Fed Balance Sheet") relative to the size of the economy between 2009 and 2019 than Weimarr Germany did in the 1920s, and then did it again from 2020-2022, it's a wonder that "half gallons" of ice cream aren't down to 36 oz (although the price has gone from around $3 to around $6-7 in my area)

    2. Miss Ann Thrope (She/It)   1 year ago

      That was long before he was prez. Now, I wouldn't disagree that his time in the senate contributed.

  29. Fats of Fury   1 year ago

    That's a Red Herring.

    1. Miss Ann Thrope (She/It)   1 year ago

      And red herring are smaller than the other kind. Same amount in the can, less fish.

  30. TJJ2000   1 year ago

    Yes it's blame-shifting ... but 'why' is the bigger story.
    For [Na]tional So[zi]al[ism] ... Regulatory capture of the market.
    Democrats have been playing this game for decades.

  31. B G   1 year ago

    If Progressive politicians didn't rail against the intended results of "progressive" policies, they'd be left with no meaningful way to pretend to be fighting inequality and wealth concentration.

  32. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

    Commie shits should terminate themselves.

    1. Minadin   1 year ago

      They can't be relied upon to do anything for themselves.

  33. tazmo8448   1 year ago

    Reading all the posts it really looks like the far right has lost their minds. Any lame brain can see what's going on in the real world. Thinking Corporate Greed is Patriotic is about as stupid as one can get. We all see (take for example) 5 lbs of sugar now 4 lbs with a higher sticker price. Or that shaving cream is now in a smaller container and the price is twice as much as the larger size. Wake up morons.

    1. Its_Not_Inevitable   1 year ago

      If they kept it the same size it would cost that much more. And it costs more because of the expansion of the fiat money supply by your heroes at the Fed and in the government.

    2. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

      Says the guy that never had to make payroll.

    3. TJJ2000   1 year ago

      "Thinking Corporate Greed is Patriotic is about as stupid as one can get."
      Thinking Gov-Gun THEFT is Patriotic ...

      We do all see the consequences of 'armed-theft' on the price-tag.
      Speaking of can't fix stupid - The more leftards STEAL the worse it gets.

      It's morons like you who cannot even wake up enough to realize your socialist mentality is the very reason things are going down the toilet ... did you seriously think the USA has gone more capitalist lately?

      But sense your bigoted indoctrinated ignorance can't think I'll just ask this. If you think it's so unfair WHY aren't you cashing in on this unjust price-tag???????? What's stopping you from making gobs of this unjust extortion? Are you just going to sit on your *ss and complain because your too F'En lazy to go do something? Yep; that's right. The leftard mentality ... whine and complain their lazy *sses off for the THEFT of others labors endlessly until one day their mentality eats all the resources and there's nothing left.

    4. Minadin   1 year ago

      For every problem, there is a solution that is clear, simple, and wrong.

      Democrats like Biden and Warren like to blame nefarious, nebulous, imaginary entities like 'big grocery' for price increases at the supermarket, because it deflects blame from their own policies. There's not an obvious one in particular to blame, either, so, to their simple-minded and ill-informed minions, who like simple answers, it all seems to make sense.

      But the fact of the matter is that there are many, many market forces and other variables that factor into the price that people pay for goods and services. Some, many of these are artificially affected by government interference in things like wages, raw material costs, transportation costs, taxes, regulatory compliance, monetary inflation, etc. - just to name a few.

      Grocers in particular operate on very thin profit margins of around 2%, and they need to make some profit to stay in business, but they also are in a very competitive market sector, so they aren't in a great position to overcharge consumers - if they did, the guy down the block wouldn't, and they would be out of business.

      If you believe that 'corporations' suddenly rediscovered that money in their coffers was good for business when Biden was sworn in, you're either unserious, or have been seriously misled.

      1. RobRBarron   1 year ago

        The current margin on a gallon of gas is near all time highs.

        The current margin on groceries is near an all time high.

        The current margin on rents is near an all time high.

        The only sector of the economy that is in distress is commercial real estate.

        *Pricing power* is a real dynamic in the economy whether the truly strabysmal or just simply ignorant want to believe it or not...

        1. TJJ2000   1 year ago

          So go sell gas, open a grocery store, start renting.
          My gosh. If the job pays so well and you won't take it; it's nobodies fault but your own.

          1. RobRBarron   1 year ago

            Huh?

        2. Miss Ann Thrope (She/It)   1 year ago

          Interesting and I'd like to learn more. Where did you get that info?

          1. RobRBarron   1 year ago

            There are any number of sources of information including the industries themselves...Census Bureau (QFRs)...research for the initial knowledge base takes some time but if you establish that adding to it is a relatively rudimentary task...

            1. Miss Ann Thrope (She/It)   1 year ago

              So you can't cite anything...

              1. RobRBarron   1 year ago

                I can cite numerous things...but last I looked I wasn't your research assistant...

  34. AT   1 year ago

    Fewer Doritos in your bag. Fewer Oreos in your box.

    Isn't this the same woman (or at least a woman of the same party) constantly whining about the obesity epidemic as a result of the allure of too much cheap junk food and not enough healthy alternatives?

    Why isn't this "Less kale in your salad. Fewer soy-based gluten-free ethically-sourced beans in the $15 coffee served by someone with a Masters degree in underwater gender theory."

  35. davard   1 year ago

    She copulates with niggers

    1. Minadin   1 year ago

      Congratulations, you've perhaps found the one thing I wouldn't criticize her over. What she does on her own time is her own business, unless she makes it a public policy campaign to prevent other people from doing the same.

      In this ONE regard, I don't think she has.

    2. Bruce D   1 year ago (edited)

      So what, asshole? She puts on a strap-on and fucks you up the ass.

  36. RobRBarron   1 year ago

    If government spending was responsible for inflation the US would have been in a continuous inflationary spiral since the 70s...

    The roots of the latest inflation can be found in the stupefying decision to remove 15-20MM barrels of oil a day off of the world market. This was done in April of 2020 at the behest of Trump who cut a deal with Russia and Saudi Arabia to effectively hand them control of the world oil market.

    Decreasing the supply of oil dramatically increased its price and thus costs. Couple that to a supply chain in distress and it's a fairly easy exercise from there to understand why we experienced the transitory *supply push* inflation.

    1. TJJ2000   1 year ago

      It has continuously inflated since the 1970's and your theory entirely falls apart at the pump as well as being insanely stupid about Biden shutting down pipelines as soon as he took office.

      1. RobRBarron   1 year ago (edited)

        *Inflationary spiral*, which is the term I used, and *inflation*, which I did not use, are two different dynamics.

        You’re welcome for that update to your deficient knowledge base.

        Joe Biden didn’t shut down any pipeline. He stopped construction of a redundant system to import Canadian tar sands…a system that would not have added one drop of oil to the global supply…

        1. RobRBarron   1 year ago

          True or False;

          OPEC output is lower now than it was in 2019.

        2. B G   1 year ago

          Keystone XL wouldn't have added any oil to the global supply, but it would burn a hell of a lot less diesel than moving all that oil by train does.

          As far as environmental risks from problems, is oil spilled by a train derailment any less dangerous than oil coming from a pipeline leak?

          The primary benefit to shutting down construction of another bigger pipeline parallel to a number of existing pipes was political goodwill toward a politician from a bunch of activists who'd protest the next sunrise if they were told that "big oil" was going to make a nickel from it happening.

          1. RobRBarron   1 year ago

            There has been a raging debate in Canada for decades about the harvesting of tarsands on the environment...Keystone has been a target for activists...they thought that they could mitigate it by transferring a good portion of that risk to the US...

      2. RobRBarron   1 year ago

        Pop Quiz: US oil output is at not only US record levels but globally as well and US exports have supplanted OPEC and other producers on the global market.

        True or False

        1. TJJ2000   1 year ago (edited)

          False according to EIA. (Thousand barrel a day crude oil)
          2019 Nov 13,000.
          2023 Nov 13,308.

          Standard yearly increase 1200.
          2023 Nov should be 17,800 by standard growth.

          Biden Killed the Keystone XL pipeline as soon as taking office.
          True or false?

          1. RobRBarron   1 year ago

            You answered the wrong question which was "'*OPEC* output is lower now than it was in 2019.' True or false?"

            The answer to that is *TRUE*.

            OPEC:
            December 2019 30.95MMbbls
            December 2023 27.78MMbbls

            US oil output hit an all-time record high in December of 2023.

            No country has ever produced that many barrels a day

            1. TJJ2000   1 year ago

              Your deception lies in population growth. You just as well be trying to make a point about oil production larger today than the horse and wagon-era.

              The point is FALSE. Standard growth has been curbed.

              1. RobRBarron   1 year ago

                Is that word salad response supposed to mean something to smart people?

                Oil isn't measured in population growth...it's measured in demand...

          2. RobRBarron   1 year ago (edited)

            Did you miss this?

            Joe Biden didn’t shut down any pipeline. He stopped construction of a redundant system to import Canadian tar sands…a system that would not have added one drop of oil to the global supply…

            The main purpose of the KXL pipeline was to mitigate environmental concerns in Canada and transfer them to the US. There is an existing pipeline that begins in Hardisty and crosses over to just outside Winnipeg, turns south and then bisects the US down to Cushing and which carries the same tarsands that KXL was to carry…

            1. TJJ2000   1 year ago

              That's right Gov-Guns curbed what the market said it needed.

              1. RobRBarron   1 year ago

                The market did not say that it needed the redundant system...in fact, it has said the opposite...

  37. tlapp   1 year ago

    The shrinkflation is the value of the dollar going down. The policies she supports are the cause. Far worse than a smaller bag of Doritos.

    1. RobRBarron   1 year ago

      The Dollar is strong against all major currencies in the world...

      1. davard   1 year ago

        Big fucking deal, you retard. They're all weak against actual stuff to buy.

        1. RobRBarron   1 year ago

          Stunning retort there, Little Lord Foo Foo...the dollar's purchasing power has been fairly stable since last Summer when prices began to fall precipitously and incomes continued to rise...

          It must really suck for you folks to believe shit *is* that actually *ain't*...

          1. TJJ2000   1 year ago

            ^^^ What inflation? I see no inflation! ^^^

            1. RobRBarron   1 year ago

              Feel free to misrepresent my comments like the good little MAGAt you are...

              1. TJJ2000   1 year ago

                Your comments *are* the misrepresentation. Way to self-project like the common leftard you are though.

                1. RobRBarron   1 year ago

                  Where did I sate that there is no inflation?

                  Either quote me or bend that needledick of yours around to your ass and go fuck yourself, dickhead...

      2. B G   1 year ago

        Every major central bank in the world was racing to see who could devalue their currency the fastest once Covid hit.

        I'm still confused how the Yen isn't stronger, though. Japan had been doing everything possible to devalue their currency since the "lost decade", and didn't have many other ways to keep up a relative pace with the rest of the west when we all got into that game.

        1. RobRBarron   1 year ago

          Japan has been signalling an upward trajectory on its interest rates for a year now...

  38. Use the Schwartz   1 year ago

    Can't let a Warren article go without mention of her Native American Heritage.

    Hmm, how to tie it in?

    That feeling of disappointment when you open that bag of chips and you find - almost nothing? That must have been how Warren felt when she got her DNA test back.

    "But muh cheekbones!"

  39. Tim V   1 year ago

    How can anyone vote for such an embarrassment?

    1. Minadin   1 year ago

      Massholes.

  40. myqurantutor   1 year ago

    very informative and useful information.
    to save ourselves from the increasing inflation. i started my online Quran teaching institute where teaching the Quran to kids, beginners, and adults is my primary focus. for more information you can visit
    https://myqurantutor.co.uk/

  41. fredgrosso   1 year ago (edited)

    Elizabeth Warren isn’t the person raising the prices at Whole Foods every day.

  42. Reason4thinking   1 year ago

    Not to get too picky, but it has not been "decades of inflation" since the pandemic. And too much money chasing too few products as the cause of inflation is bogus reasoning. Supply is contracted, and demand stays the same. Prices go up. The extra money in your pocket helps to pay. No money to pay and demand goes down, so does your economy. The intent of the stimulus packages was to get through a time when people were being laid off en masse: at peak 25% of working people in this country were either unemployed or converted to part time status and underemployed.

    I like to use the "Pepsi" index to evaluate the economic impact of corporate policies. Pepsi makes consumer products that most consumers can really live without and demand should be elastic They are well and truly disposable. Yet, people buy even with those high prices, which means demand is passing as ineleastic. The CEO of Pepsi (and quite a few others) have publicly stated that they are happy to keep prices high knowing that demand is inelastic. Several CEO have talked about briefly pausing "targeted" price increases but not getting rid of the practice. In the last quarter of 2023, Pepsi net profits increased 147%. Yet there total volume fell. How does that happen? Shrinkflation and price gouging.

    Corporations are analytical entities. They used the pandemic as a gigantic marketing excercise and came to conclude that their profits can be maintained because of their market position and inelastic demand. Marketing to consumers has converted a want into a need. How many companies make soft-drinks?? Elizabeth Warren is right to point out yet another excellent example of how markets fail.

    Whether legislation is appropriate is another story. But for certain, at this point the consumer has to say, enough. Make your demand elastic. Do you really need those potato chips and cheetohs?

    1. Richard Bees   1 year ago

      In a free market, you are not "gouged". If the price goes up, you buy less of it. If you want to buy more, you are gouging yourself (you did say this was elastic, right?)
      Legislation is never appropirate, it distorts a free market to the point no one knows what something is worth and cannot make informed decisions.
      Stop pumping trillions into the mix and people do what they're supposed to do: buy less. Inflation is NOT a solution. It's an additional problem and yours to keep long after the spending has stopped, like the home version of a really crappy game.

  43. Gregdn   1 year ago (edited)

    The problem with Warren’s ‘logic’ is that she can’t explain why greed suddenly kicked in last year or the one before. One would think greed would be ever present.

  44. Richard Bees   1 year ago

    Warren is the ultimate Karen, constantly emitting a shrill, hectoring stream of advice, like a far less entertaining version of Andy Rooney. Okay, sweetheart, we'll go back to original size and you explain the price increase to us. I mean, you're going to bitch about something, right?
    Shooting through a couple trillion to placate the masses during your fake lockdown, that wouldn't have anything to do with this situation, would it?
    Heaven forfend, but perhaps the government shoveling money out of helicopters had something to do with this?
    I find it hard to believe you obtained a law degree without ever taking a class in economics, but hey, that's what it looks like.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Cincinnati's Beer-Loving Germans Endured Anti-Immigrant and Anti-Alcohol Resistance

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | From the August/September 2025 issue

Brickbat: Second Opinion

Charles Oliver | 7.3.2025 4:00 AM

How the NCAA Helped Trump Score Big on Transgender Issues

Billy Binion | 7.2.2025 5:34 PM

Under the 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' Car Companies Won't Be Fined for Failing To Hit Arbitrary Fuel Efficiency Goals

Joe Lancaster | 7.2.2025 5:15 PM

The 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Keeps Most of Joe Biden's Energy Subsidies

Jeff Luse | 7.2.2025 4:44 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!