Biden Considering Higher Tariffs on E.V.s Imported from China, Raising Prices for Americans
Tariffs of 25 percent introduced under Donald Trump have been allowed to remain in place, and Biden may tack on even more to shield American firms from competition.

U.S. lawmakers, afraid of competition from China, have advocated for President Joe Biden to make products more expensive for Americans. Unfortunately, Biden may do it.
In a November letter to U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai, a bipartisan group of lawmakers urged the Biden administration to raise tariffs on electric vehicles (E.V.s) imported from China. Under President Donald Trump, the U.S. imposed 25-percent tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars worth of Chinese imports. (Imported automobiles already receive a 2.5-percent tariff across the board.) Since taking office, Biden has allowed Trump's tariffs to remain in place, worsening inflation and costing Americans billions of dollars in higher costs.
The November letter—signed by Reps. Mike Gallagher (R–Wis.) and Raja Krishnamoorthi (D–Ill.), among others—argued that for E.V.s, 25 percent is too low. "It is critical that tariffs on PRC automobiles not only be maintained but also increased to stem the expected surge in PRC imports," the letter warned, using the acronym for the People's Republic of China. "It is only a matter of time before PRC manufacturers will be able to absorb the additional 25 percent tariff on PRC vehicles to access the U.S. market."
Over the weekend, Axios reported that "the Biden administration is moving toward keeping many of former President Trump's controversial tariffs on some $300 billion in Chinese imports in place, and aims to increase duties on electric vehicles and some critical minerals," such as the rare earth metals used to make E.V. batteries. The 2022 Inflation Reduction Act also provides tax credits to Americans who purchase E.V.s but is limited only to those sourced and assembled in North America.
The Axios report speculated that Biden could raise tariffs in order to be competitive in his reelection bid against Trump, as a means "to undermine any attempts by Trump to cast Biden as 'soft' on the Asian powerhouse." But the tariffs have a real impact on Americans' wallets by making products less affordable.
"The Biden administration conversations have picked up recently as officials grow concerned about Chinese clean-energy exports, which are flooding global markets at low prices as China's domestic economy slumps," The Wall Street Journal wrote in December. "U.S. officials worry that American companies, even with the protection of existing tariffs and new subsidies, won't be able to compete with China's production."
While the administration is concerned about American companies' ability to compete with China, it seems to care little about American people who may enjoy the ability to buy energy-efficient products at a steep discount.
The Chinese government aggressively subsidized E.V. production for more than a decade, and manufacturers followed the money. Chinese manufacturer BYD produced five million vehicles during that time. Then, amid slowing demand, the government pared back its generous subsidies and Chinese automakers responded by dropping prices aggressively. European automakers, in turn, have scrambled to find a way to lower prices on their own vehicles to compete.
Unfortunately, tariffs on China mean American consumers are unable to take advantage of the situation. Europeans are able to buy E.V.s made by Chinese companies for less than $45,000—less than the average cost of an E.V. in America—but 25-percent tariffs make them artificially noncompetitive in the States.
And it's not just Chinese firms that are affected by tariffs: Nissan builds vehicles in China which it then sells around the world, as does Tesla. The lawmakers who called for increased tariffs acknowledged as much in their November letter: "Many of the EVs exported from the PRC are made by Western brands, such as Tesla, that have significant production capacity in the PRC. Furthermore, U.S. automakers are starting to shift the production of vehicles for the U.S. market to the PRC, such as the Buick Envision and the Lincoln Nautilus. The trend of shifting production from the United States to the PRC underscores that the current tariff level on imported vehicles from the PRC is insufficient."
Or…perhaps it indicates that American companies are making a financial decision and going where manufacturing costs are cheaper. Tariffs don't make domestic products cheaper, they make foreign-made products more expensive, leaving consumers without an inexpensive alternative to buying American.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Biden is taxing stuff from China to prop up domestic industry! Another move principled Trump supporters should applaud!
Trump is taxing stuff from China to prop up domestic Industry, so we reluctantly voted for Joe Biden!
I get paid more than $120 to $130 every hour for working on the web. I found out about this Qf activity 3 months prior and subsequent to joining this I have earned effectively $15k from this without having internet working abilities Copy underneath site to..
Check It—>>> http://Www.Smartcareer1.com
What you mean "we" kemosabe?
Does this mean he's a racist? Those are the rules right?
Yup. He's racist.
At last, the poor child slaves will become just unemployed child slaves.
https://thefederalist.com/2024/01/05/africans-might-know-its-christmas-if-they-werent-slaves-to-green-energy/
Well, it’s a good thing that we got rid of that uncouth economic illiterate we previously had in the White House, and all those nasty trade-restricting tariffs!
Why raise tariffs on them when he could just remove their subsidies?
Actually, the Buy American Act means that a lot of the EV's on the market don't qualify already.
By subsidy, do you mean the mandate you buy one?
I agree, 2023 was the hottest year on record, so I want my mandated electric vehicle to be as cheap as possible! Fighting Climate Change is too important to worry about which country reaps the profits!
Also, once again, whomever's turning the lights off don't forget to repeal The Jones Act on your way out!
So let me get this strait. Joe Biden hasn't eliminated a tariff that Donald Trump put in place. Interesting.
Correction needed...
Tariffs of 25 percent introduced under Donald Trump have been allowed to remain in place, and Biden may tack on even more to shield American firms from ... [Na]tional So[zi]alist policy in D.C.
I mean seriously.... What's the narrative playing out here that foreign manufacturing gets US exemptions that US citizens don't get? How about a "free-trade" export policy to export all environmentalists and their Nazi-clan to foreign countries?
Bloomberg News has this to say about PRC's electric vehicle production: https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-03-20/quality-issues-plague-china-s-electric-car-industry
Tariffs protect domestic jobs. Period.
That's correct, in the same way "guns kill people" is right. Technically correct but lacking any linkage to reality.
Yeah, he sort of left out they increase the cost to US folks.
Well, no they don't on anything like a one-to-one ratio. They might simply make the good so expensive (paying US wages) that no one buys it meaning there are no added jobs.
Gonna guess you might be a union memeber.
Well, this is gonna take some un-packing:
1) EVs suck and would never sell in the amount they did a couple of months ago absent subsidies, as is currently obvious.
2) And now import EVs are subject to a higher (un-subsidized) price?
Not sure I've got all the conditional clauses worked out here, but would someone please explain who are the bad guys?
It sounds like the important thing is that government is in control.
Like Maryland used to actively restrict the number of wineries AND fund initiatives to increase and expand the number of wineries. That sort of thing.
Or you can look from the 2030 sustainability goals to the 2050 goals and assume they’re actually just trying to get rid of cars altogether. It kind of makes sense in that context. If you want a car it’ll have to be one of these and they’ll have to be too expensive.
Wait, so Biden is going to add Tariffs to Imported EV vehicles.
Ok, US will make their own. Oh wait, Biden is also going put tariffs on the rare earth metals needed.
Sure that makes complete sense there.
Yes, we have rare earth metals here, but the democrats/socialist will flip out with the danger to people mining for them. Since it's in China, they don't care right now.
Given all of the videos of the Chinese EVs spontaneously catching fire. I consider these higher tarriffs a safety measure.