America Has Borrowed $1 Trillion Since the Start of Football Season
The federal government is borrowing money at a mind-spinning rate, and you can't blame it on the COVID-19 pandemic anymore.

Here's how fast the federal government is borrowing piles of money: when the national debt hit $33 trillion in mid-September, the current National Football League (NFL) season was already two weeks old.
You don't have to be a fan of sports to know that football season in America isn't particularly long—excluding the playoffs, teams play 17 games over the span of 18 weeks. The final games of the season are scheduled to be played this upcoming weekend, a few days after the national debt officially surpassed a new threshold: $34 trillion, according to an announcement made Wednesday morning by the Treasury Department.
In other words, don't feel bad about how much money you've probably lost on sports betting and fantasy leagues this year. The federal government has run up a $1 trillion tab in less time—and the next trillion-dollar threshold isn't far off.
"Looking ahead, debt will continue to skyrocket as the Treasury expects to borrow nearly $1 trillion more by the end of March," said Michael A. Peterson, CEO of the Peter G. Peterson Foundation, in a statement. "Adding trillion after trillion in debt, year after year, should be a flashing red warning sign to any policymaker who cares about the future of our country."
Indeed, it's astounding how quickly the federal government is piling up new debt. Equally remarkable is how much sooner it has hit some of these thresholds compared to the expected trajectories before the COVID-19 pandemic. As the Associated Press (AP) points out, as of January 2020 the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projected that the federal government wouldn't be $34 trillion in debt until 2029.
Since then, the debt has grown faster due to the unprecedented levels of fiscal stimulus unleashed during the pandemic and because baseline federal spending has failed to return to pre-pandemic levels. In the fiscal year that ended in September, the federal government spent $6.1 trillion, up from $4.4 trillion in fiscal year 2019 (the last one before the pandemic). Federal revenue has climbed in recent years as well—$4.4 trillion last year, up from $3.5 trillion in 2019—but those increases haven't been large enough to keep up with the surge in new spending.
In that January 2020 CBO report cited by the AP, federal spending was expected to hit $5.3 trillion by 2023. The federal government is now running about $800 billion ahead of that pace—and that doesn't account for any of the one-time emergency COVID-related spending—and so naturally the annual budget deficits are bigger and the national debt is growing at a faster rate.
"Though our level of debt is dangerous for both our economy and for national security, America just cannot stop borrowing," said Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonprofit that advocates for lower deficits, in a statement. "This is a moment of consequence and continuing to refuse to pay our own bills will not lead us to where we need to be as a nation."
In some ways, it seemed like 2023 was the start of a political reckoning with the government's addiction to borrowing. In August, Fitch cut the federal government's credit rating, and Moody's warned in November that it might soon do the same. Against that backdrop, Congress navigated a debt ceiling increase that placed some new limits on future discretionary spending—even though so-called mandatory spending on things like Social Security and Medicare are the bigger drivers of the long-term budget problems.
The debt is likely to become an even bigger story in the new year: "The Debt Matters Again," proclaimed The New York Times this week, noting that economists who spent the past decade downplaying concerns about the debt are now getting more worried because of how higher interest rates have made borrowing more expensive.
That's a nasty feedback loop—one that Reason and others have been warning about for years—that means the federal government will have to borrow more money in future years to afford the payments on the money it has already borrowed. The Peterson Foundation estimates that the government spends about $2 billion per day just to service the cost of existing debt.
Oh, and Congress still hasn't passed a budget for the year. The current continuing resolution expires in two stages: one later this month and a second in early February.
Until lawmakers make some serious changes to fiscal policy, expect these announcements to keep coming with greater frequency—at least for a little while. The United States has about 20 years until "no amount of future tax increases or spending cuts could avoid the government defaulting on its debt," economists at the University of Pennsylvania warned in October.
One of the things that makes professional football so compelling is the urgency that comes with each week. With so few games on the schedule, each one is seemingly the most important of the year, and even a single loss early in the season can have a significant impact on a team's long-term aspirations.
Congress would do well to embrace that same sense of urgency when it comes to the country's fiscal status, which is a game no one should want to lose.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Fuck Joe Biden
The president that most of the Reason staff "reluctantly" voted for is going down in history as the president who destroyed the petrodollar and the U.S dollar's preferred global reserve currency status.
And sadly there's nothing he, they, or anyone else can do about it at this point. I hope they're all proud of themselves.
I get paid more than $120 to $130 every hour for working on the web. I found out about this Qs activity 3 months prior and subsequent to joining this I have earned effectively $15k from this without having internet working abilities Copy underneath site to..
Check It—>>> http://Www.Smartcareer1.com
Fuck everyone who voted to increase the debt.
Seconded.
The DEBT is not the DEFICIT. And the DEFICIT is not the DEBT. They are separate problems.
Government BORROWING drives up the debt, not government SPENDING.
The solution to our debt problem is simple: STOP ISSUING DEBT-BASED MONEY! Begin issuing pure “unbacked” fiat money to fund the deficit, rather than going further into debt. The inflationary impact of unbacked dollars is no worse than the inflationary impact of the same amount of debt-backed dollars. Issuing unbacked dollars will halt the increase in the national debt and its crushing $700 billion in annual interest. Paying off part of the maturing debt each year and rolling over the rest will eventually bring the national debt (and its taxpayer-financed interest payments) down to zero. See http://www.fixourmoney.com .
You're dealing with a TDS-addled pile of shit.
For a comparison, it took from Washington to Reagan for the national debt to accumulate its first trillion. Over 200 years and now it's not even taking 200 days.
A hike in inflation.
agree !
I wonder why they didn’t inflation adjust 2019 vs 2023 numbers? If they would have it would be the same amount of spending and there’s no cause for alarm - we are sinking the ship just as fast as we always have.
But that wouldn't make it look like it was all Joe Biden's fault and Chumby couldn't put "Fuck Joe Biden" as the first comment. There's a method to their madness.
IOWs, they'd be lying, which is fine by TDS-addled lefty shits like you.
A trillion dollars buys a lot of buffalo wings.
I think you could buy the city of Buffalo along with the Bills included and still have money left over for a Pepsi.
If they had invested it in something, like betting on the football games instead of Ukraine, we might have almost broken even.
Simply taking all the bets against the Lions making the playoffs would've retired half the national debt.
Blame it on illegal immigrants. Ignore the retired Republican voters who use Social Security to fund their vacations while Medicare pays for a new heart valve.
Reminds me of one of my favorite Babylon Bee articles: Biden Spends $2 Trillion to Discover the Source of Inflation.
Maybe we should talk to the CCP to see how they get away with it. Helicopter money for every developer, ruptured business, failed farm.
Oh wait, they don't.
It's alway fun to listen to the Left telling you how to spend your own money. Of course the illegal immigrants are our fault. We told them there were endless breadsticks, BBQ wings, and cocktail wienies right across the border.
Biden is completely blameless, even that baldheaded MFer he's got running immigration. How can you be held accountable when you don't know what you're doing?
I mean, really.
Pointing at immigrants while retirees bankrupt the nation like playing the fiddle while Rome burns.
Does anyone, anywhere, regardless of political affiliation have a solution to Obamacare and Medicare and Medicaid? Obamacare created millions of “Tech” and insurance pencil pushing middlemen the banks got mergers and acquisitions. Checking into a a doctors appointment is now like filling out a 50 page form. My sister, a RN and the front line MDs are overwhelmed. The whole tech thing sucks and it’s FUBAR data mining and a fucking middlemen jobs program! Our insurance went up 60 percent this year- I guess the democrats keep throwing money at subsidies. The housing subsidies also. Fixing prices and creating useless jobs. The prices KEEP GOING UP, gee I wonder why?
Abolish Obamacare and Medicaid and Medicare. A catastrophic (meaning cancer, car accidents, neurological diseases- anything that will bankrupt a U.S. citizen) single payer that kicks in at 10 percent of AGI, no exceptions. Private Insurance to fill in the gaps. [End rant]
Does anyone, anywhere, regardless of political affiliation have a solution to Obamacare and Medicare and Medicaid?
Yes.
Before the comments section was overrun by Trump worshippers people would said "Fuck you, cut spending."
Realistic solution? Cut spending. How? Freeze it. Nobody on any of those programs gets a raise until inflation balances the budget.
Will it suck? Yes. Will it work? Yes.
That of course means it will never happen.
I’m always good for a fuck you, cut spending.
The craziest thing is we could return the budget to like 2019 spending and it would automatically be balanced against current revenue.
Fuck off and die, steaming pile of lefty shit.
Resume medical "insurance" to what it actually was and should be. Insurance!
Not something that pays the entire cost of health care for everyone and anyone with no regard to how it will be paid for.
Insurance is for catastrophic and/or unpredictable events. Not for daily expenses....except with healthcare. This corruption has destroyed the whole system.
Is anyone, especially here, really arguing that immigrants cost more than entitlement spending? Or do they just point out that there is an actual cost to illegal/unfettered immigration?
At least we have some obligation to seniors who actually paid in for SS amd Medicare. While we have zero obligation to a bunch of illegals. But of course Sarc has to do something to attack American citizens, and republicans in particular.
The drunken pussy does love his precious democrats.
It's always fun to listen to the Right telling you how to spend your own money. You little cons always forget that the Left pays taxes, too, and therefore wants a say in how to spend it.
No even a good copy, let alone intelligent.
Ignorance is no excuse.
It has "Biden Administration" as one of the categories on the bottom, but...
Crtl-F = "Biden" yields no results in the article itself.
haha money printer go brrrr
https://twitter.com/DissidentSoaps/status/1742630953766334804?t=zisZ0AQ-1f5T8FjrWYuMIQ&s=19
They’re intentionally flooding the country with non-Whites while ramping up their anti-White rhetoric.
The point is to lay the blame for every problem, shortcoming & disaster on you, White man.
[Link]
The left should be culled.
Gosh, if only there were a principled and persuasive libertarian publication that would address such issues in a clear and persuasive way. But, alas, there is not.
I wonder what it would have been without Bush and Trump tax cuts? There is more than one way we give out free money in this country. Providing a social safety net, infrastructure, and a national defense without paying for them does eventually add up.
It wouldn't matter much. No matter what the tax rates are, even when top rates were much higher pre-Reagan, the federal government has never been able to collect more than 20% of GDP in taxes and other income, and typically it is more like 17%.
The problem is spending, not revenue. If we returned to the federal spending levels of 2019 and stayed there, we'd have surpluses in a few years.
IOW: "Fuck you, cut spending"
2019 spending levels were sane? Excuse me what? I completely realize that the only real Operation Warp Speed going on during COVID times was at the Federal Reserve, but lets not imagine that surpluses have been anything but a dream since the 90s, and that was only just barely, because of a trifecta of the dot com boom, economic reforms in China, and Japan shitting the bed. America turned up a decade of royal flushes of pure luck and barely managed to break even.
He didn’t say they were sane, just that if we froze spending at that years budget of $4.47T per this link: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/statistics/data/federal-budget-receipts-and-outlays
We’d have surpluses in a few years. Revenue for 2023 was approximately $4.44T per this link: https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-finance-guide/#:~:text=In%2020232%2C%20the%20federal,2023%20was%20Individual%20Income%20Taxes.
So I think that would be totally doable, if anyone actually wanted to (and mind you that 4.47 trillion includes a metric shit ton of bloat).
That makes the assumption that revenue will continue increasing even after spending freezes, but the primary driver of revenue is, somewhat ironically, spending. You never recover 100% of what you spend, but you recover some portion of it. The problem isn't the number of dollars the government brings in but how much those dollars will buy. All this nonsense of "if current trends continue" will never result in anything and creates the same short term reductive budgeting that has that has caused this mess and continues to cause it. We don't need a government that will "someday" being solvent (in our fantasies, if you close one eye and ignore half the equation). You budget for what you have now.
Is that inflation-adjusted 2019 spending you want? Because that's about the same as current spending.
"...Because that’s about the same as current spending."
You.
Are.
Full
Of.
Shit.
Tax cuts definitionally go to the people who pay them. That's why tax cuts for the poor is a dumb concept, and most tax cuts are for the rich.
Doesn't matter. You know why? Thats what a budget is for. You know a budget, you know how much you get per month. They are taking in record revenue and still running trillions.
It's a spending problem not a revenue. Hell, you didn't even need to cut spending just freeze it at a level. The democrats called that apocalyptic.
Except neither of their tax cuts decreased revenue.
Fuck you, cut spending.
The tax cuts increased revenue. Are you really this ignorant?
"I wonder what it would have been without Bush and Trump tax cuts?..."
I wonder what it would have been if you had a brain cell.
But no mean tweets.
"No one" cares about the debt because they know it will NEVER be repaid. Future generations will rightly claim, "*I* didn't borrow that. My grandparents did." The American government, with the broad support of her people (in the name of stock market indexes or "the economy" or "safety nets"), will simply inflate its way out of it. This will eventually end in disaster, but probably not before every other country's government ends in disaster first.
This is the only reason no one has called America's bond bluff yet. No two countries are
the samenot on fire. America is definitely going straight off the cliff, but everyone else is already in free fall. China is literally about to implode as soon as soon as Xi Jinping (age 70) dies. Russia has already imploded. The Middle East is at war (as is tradition). Europe is broke, and unlike America no one wants their colorful oversized bills. England is about to have a constitutional crisis. Australia is being run by escaped mental patients. South America is playing Musical Governments (as is tradition). The only sane place left to go is Mars, but some idiots seem to have the idea that importing humans there will improve the place.Comparatively, America is doing alright.
I'm not going to blame CoVid, I'm blaming every Republican since Reagan who pushed through tax cuts without having the balls to cut programs that are popular with the electorate & would get them voted out of office.
Supply side economics has never worked. Tax cuts for the wealthy does not create middle class jobs. The middle class was stable from the 50s to the mid 70s & has been declining, not just in % of the population but also in buying power since Reagan took office.
Job creation is a result of increased demand. Tax cuts for the wealthy has resulted in stock buybacks which have inflated stock prices (& executive compensation!) while doing nothing in regards to the company's infrastructure. Southwest Airlines problems were only one of the more obvious results. Herb Kelleher is rolling in his grave.
A lot of other things changed in the early 70s (like fully getting rid of the gold standard). Why do you assume that tax cuts are the main culprit?
Whatever, Krugnuts.....
I know you are going to believe what you want without facts but the middle class as seen a rise and poverty decreases.
House have been affordable till lately
Cars - everyone has one. Not just the rich
Flying - hell poor people can fly cheaply.
Vacations
Lots of other things. The middle class is fine. It like everyone spends above their means.
You believe the us vs the rich because you can't work hard or chose poorly.
Tired Old Cliche Alert!
That’s an impressive amount of Democrat talking points crammed into one short post.
Too bad it’s 100% bullshit.
Let us abandon the old myths about debt: a sovereign nation can print as much money as it wants with the only constraint being inflation. And if the money is wisely invested in education healthcare, research, infrastructure, and other things that grow the economy, the onomy can grow faster than debt and keep inflation down.
With this massive spending recently comes also massive growth and the inflation rate is now well below the historical average by 25% and wages are growing faster than the inflation rate. So if that massive spending were indeed causing inflation, which is is not, and if the economy were being hampered (we have record unemployment, record stock market highs).....then that spending would be a problem. But the problem is only when money is misspent on nonproductive programs like weapons and subsidies to il companies and so it creates a gap with growth and brings about inflation. Spending is not the problem if it is used to build the economy and jobs, to increase productivity and avoid creating inflation by unnecessary spending subsidizing the world's richest corporations and giving huge tax breaks to the wealthiest class. IF the spending were harmful, why is inflation down, wages up, unemployment down, the stock market up?
That you, Krugnut's brain damaged cousin? Thought so......
Definitely at least a fellow traveler.
MMT! MMT! MMT! MMT! MMT! MMT!
And if the money is wisely invested in education healthcare, research, infrastructure, and other things that grow the economy
And the government is full of wise men who can figure out where to put this money better than investors?
And if the money is wisely invested in education healthcare, research, infrastructure, and other things that grow the economy
Those things don't grow the economy. They hobble it.
"Let us abandon the old myths about debt:..."
Let us not abandon the old truths regarding fucking lefty imbeciles.
Fuck off and die in a fire.
It's almost like printing money and immediately lighting it on fire isn't actually building anything for the future!
Meanwhile Cuba worse than usual:
https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/cubas-economy-still-shrinking-minister-says-2023-12-20/
The rationers will shrink rations and raise energy prices. I wonder if the central planner who quipped “we must do something different” is
A. Alive right now
B. In a re-education camp
C. On a raft to the U.S.
My money is on B
Stay At Home mummy From the large apple Shared Her Secret On but She Was ready to clear 5000 US dollars Weekly From on-line Work merely 3 Weeks once Losing Her recent Job… https://jobstime0909.blogspot.com
But, but, but … It was all Trumps fault!
Just ask any self-projecting Democrat. /s
Whatever they do; It’s all those other people’s fault!
... Enter the mind of the full blown criminal.
agree !