Biden Expands Pardons for Low-Level Federal Marijuana Offenders
The pardons freed no prisoners, but the White House says they will ease the burden of a criminal record.

President Joe Biden expanded a categorical pardon today for low-level marijuana offenders convicted on federal lands and in the District of Columbia, a move the White House says will ease the burden of a criminal record for thousands of people.
"Criminal records for marijuana use and possession have imposed needless barriers to employment, housing, and educational opportunities," Biden said in a White House press release. "Too many lives have been upended because of our failed approach to marijuana. It's time that we right these wrongs."
In October of last year, the White House announced categorical pardons for those convicted of simple possession of marijuana on federal lands. Today's announcement expands the eligible offenses.
Biden also commuted the sentences of 11 nonviolent drug offenders serving sentences that were much longer than they would have been if the prisoners had been sentenced today. They were convicted of cocaine and methamphetamine offenses.
On the campaign trail, Biden promised to fix some of the federal drug war's most draconian policies—many of which he was partly responsible for—but his administration was slow to act on those promises, leading to criticism from criminal justice advocacy groups.
As Reason's Jacob Sullum wrote last year, Biden's marijuana pardons were estimated to potentially benefit roughly 10,000 people, but they didn't free a single one of the nearly 3,000 people serving long federal sentences for marijuana offenses. They also didn't apply to noncitizens.
In his statement today, Biden urged state governors to use their clemency powers too. "Just as no one should be in a federal prison solely due to the use or possession of marijuana, no one should be in a local jail or state prison for that reason, either," Biden said.
But as Sullum wrote, the logic of Biden's position on marijuana—that possessing and using it should not be a crime, but selling it should remain illegal—makes no sense:
The moral logic of Biden's distinction between simple possession and other marijuana offenses is hard to follow. He says using marijuana should not be treated as a crime. If so, how can helping people use marijuana justify sending anyone to prison? And why should people convicted of assisting cannabis consumption be saddled with felony records for the rest of their lives?
Still, the pardons reflect the continuing collapse of public support for prohibiting marijuana. Following the passage of ballot referendums in Ohio this November, marijuana is legal in 24 states. A Gallup poll last month reported that 70 percent of Americans favored legalizing marijuana—an all-time high.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"our failed approach to marijuana. It's time that we right these wrongs."
Righting those wrongs would also involve removing the regulations that forbid banks from dealing with marijuana industries legal in the several states and deregulating the DEA prescription schedules for drugs. But of course that's not gonna happen because Biden doesn't really mean what he says.
^ This. If the government were at all serious, they would simply remove the laws that are causing the injuries in the first place rather than forgiving a few people after their lives are mostly ruined.
I suspect the alphabet law enforcement agencies have built a house of cards out of pot specifically as a 'marker' for different criminal conduct but given how many Americans smoke pot every day it should be obvious even to the most stoned among us that this law enforcement narrative is garbage.
How did the DOJ put it? Marijuana users are "unreliable, untrustworthy, and unvirtuous?" And of course anyone who possesses a firearm and uses MJ is rendered a felon. No, they are not giving this up anytime soon.
nice article
The part of "the government" which can do that is not the President. The reason pot is still federally illegal is because Congress wants it to be. Tell them.
“The pardons freed no prisoners,”
I mean, that pretty well sums up how stupid this is.
It got what the Biden administration was hoping for, media saying how pro drug he is for doing nothing.
Biden Expands Pardons for Low-Level Federal Marijuana Offenders
But will he pay off their student loans?
Were the students high when they signed the loan papers?
To borrow over $100,000 for a degree in English? Yes. They absolutely had to be stoned. I suspect the college admissions people provided the Marijuana.
Take it off the Schedule. Asshole.
Isn't that a Congress , not a President thing ?
I have read that the DEA or FDA can reschedule it any time they want. Considering how much else executive orders can do, it seems plausible to me.
Also bear in mind that Biden can stretch his executive authority to the very utmost, if he puts his mind to it. If he doesn't, it's not from a newfound respect for the limits of Presidential powers, for for less creditable political reasons.
Even if the USSC says he can't he would do it anyways. And even brag about doing it.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/biden-supreme-court-136-million-student-loan-debts
But he recognizes the constitution.
Of course he recognizes the Constitution! He has a copy of it on his wall at home in the shape of a dartboard!
As it stands, the ATF can make new rules anytime it wants.
Why can’t the DEA?
It's at the discretion of the DEA unless explicitly ordered by Congress. The DEA falls under the executive branch. So I don't see why any president couldn't just change it with an executive order. Of course the DEA would do their best to fight it, and this Supreme Court would certainly side with keeping it illegal if it came to that.
I believe the DEA has the final word on scheduling and the official procedure involves complicated bureaucracy between the FDA and DEA. It is all within the executive branch. So, while technically, the president can't change the scheduling, as the head of the executive branch a competent president could make it happen.
I don't see why congress couldn't alter the CSA to achieve the same result though.
I don’t see why congress couldn’t alter the CSA to achieve the same result though.
Might be as easy as adding the words "and cannabis" next to alcohol. Two words.
Congress says its an Executive thing. The law says its a DEA thing.
The President says he doesn't have the authority to order the DEA to reschedule.
Why couldn't the guy who said "Then, I have an Article II, where I have to the right to do whatever I want as president” get it done?
If Congress and the law say it's a DEA and executive thing, then Biden, as usual, is lying his ass off.
It takes a certain level of mental capacity to lie [you have to have the ability to know it's a lie]; otherwise it is just demented rambling.
The President says he doesn’t have the authority to order the DEA to reschedule.
The DEA gets their authority to act, all of it, from the President. They're merely a vessel of executive power. The President IS the DEA, in a sense, as well as being the FBI, the DHS, the CIA, the NSA, all of it. They are all mere parts of the whole that is the presidency.
Congress can do it statutorily, or the attorney general can do it administratively. Somebody could sue to keep it illegal by saying the attorney general didn't follow proper procedures, but I don't see how they could get standing, since nobody suffers any material loss from its not being illegal. Like, "I'm hurt by being allowed to buy or sell this stuff"? Since you're not forced to, you suffer no loss. You don't hold a patent on it, so you don't suffer any loss by someone else's being allowed to sell it.
If the attorney general won't do it, s/he's fired. And you keep firing attorney generals until you find one who will. Line them all up, the process should take no more than a few seconds before you find one.
Could the DEA argue that they'd be harmed by being deprived of all those juicy asset forfeitures?
I'm sure the DEA would argue just that. Without Marijuana being illegal they might have to go after dangerous people who don't sample their own wares and would shoot back.
So as a follow up to my own question , I just read that the President can sign executive order to have DEA review it for rescheduling; but cant make them do it. The DEA can review it and just say "nah" and keep going business as usual. There is nothing the President can directly to do end it, not in his powers. Congress can roundabout do it with laws that make it moot, but hasn't; and prefers that it goes through normal channels of the DEA.
Ultimately , it seems up to the DEA and how much drug revenue they want to give up to leave hippies and stoners alone.
That's really a bit of a red herring. If Biden wants it done he can make it happen up to and including firing any intransigent DEA bureaucrats and nominating replacements who agree to reschedule. All of the remaining impediments to legalization are in the hands of a Democrat administration and a Democrat senate. If it hasn't been done it's because they don't want it done.
Drug control is an industry unto itself. And they ain't giving up anything.
Too much money in it. @Hilary Clinton.
Millions of cops, jailors, counselors, drug testers, and parole and probation officers would have to find legitimate work.
Yes, this!!! To the nth power!
And THIS is why Der TrumpfenFarter-Fuhrer didn't do ONE SINGLE DAMNED SIGNIFICUNT THING to fix this shit, while He was Emperor, either!!!
The last time a marijuana legalization bill passed the House and went to the Senate, it died due to Republican opposition there.
Can the President fire the head of the DEA? If not, that seems a violation of the Constitutional principle that the President heads the executive branch.
If he can, then fire that person for wasting government resources. Fire his successor if policy does not reverse. Keep firing them until you get someone in that position that is in touch with reality - or until there's no one left but the janitors.
Actually, the president can just order the DOJ to charge those DEA administrators who are breaking the law.
The "law" say to be on schedule 1, a substance must have 'no medical uses'. So far the DEA just says all the research proving medical uses of the devil weed are not valid, because they say so.
So Mr. Executive could also fire all the medical science deniers for incompetence, and the replacements would get the hint.
No. The Chief Executive can order rescheduling or de-scheduling.
Congress could repeal provisions of the law or abrogate the Single Convention treaty. I believe the executive, legislative and judicial branches all have the power to end federal marijuana prohibition.
The pardons freed no prisoners, but the White House says they will ease the burden of a criminal record.
The elusive prison filled with non-violent marijuana offenders turns out to be more elusive than even I thought.
When "uses marijuana and owns a firearm" counts as a "violent offense" even if no actual act of violence occurred, it does get rather harder to find those in a country where at least a third of all adults own at least one firearm.
"Show me the man, and I'll show you the crime."
L Berea
Aha! Joe is preparing to pardon Hunter after all.
What about prisoners held for violation of probation or parole for mj possession or even possession of mj metabolites in their urine?
I'm a non violent drug offender. Class 4 felony unlawful sale of Marijuana in Colorado. No violence at all.
Man, Biden is really trying to woo the youth vote these days huh? Try and pay off their student loans and forgive them if they smoked pot, maybe if the Fed feels like it, sounds like a good deal to 20-somethings I'm sure.
For everyone else that has money, he's making sure it's worth less every day.
If he was really trying, the feds would mail a couple of ounces to everyone under 30.
To really boost ratings, make it menthol flavored.
Racist!
Then they might forget to vote. Better to just make empty promises.
This is a feeble attempt to shore up the crumbling left flank of Biden's coalition, which is disintegrating because of Biden's complicity in the war crimes in Gaza. This is pathetic.
Gaza war crimes like Gazans raping and beheading women and children civilians?
Or is only the Israeli responce a war crime?
Just kidding, based on your prior posts I'm sure those poor Gazans had to rape and butcher civilians because Israel made them do it since obviously Jews are not allowed to be alive. Shame on them!
FAFO
No no, the war crimes were in Israel, committed by Gazans.
Perhaps during the many decades Methuselah spent in the senate he could have championed eliminating these victimless crime laws.
Ah, but I was so much older then
I'm younger than that now
He actually supported every single one of these laws. Which is why so many Reason staff were reluctant when they voted for him.
Almost like libertarians don't actually support liberty. Weird.
At first they came for the pot smokers not attending cocktail parties…
'"Criminal records for marijuana use and possession have imposed needless barriers to employment, housing, and educational opportunities," Biden said in a White House press release.'
Wait, I thought only greedy capitalists and MAGA Republicans did that.
This is the preliminaries leading up to a pre-emptive Hunter pardon.
It's nothing but a banana republic political prosecution according to Jacob Sullum.
As of today marijuana is a schedule 1 substance, in the company of heroin and such.
If I use marijuana [purchased legally in my State] and own a firearm, I am guilty of committing a felony.
Given the stance of our current administration, I do not see that changing anytime soon. So this is just more sounds good bullshit in run up to 2024 election.
I'd say "stopped clocks...", but that would suggest droolin' Joe is right twice a day.
He's no better than a blind squirrel without sense of smell.
Oh look at the that... The most draconian drug warrior has a change of heart. Well, not really. Just for some chosen few who the King has given his almighty over-lording blessing for some votes probably.
Biden was at the center of building federal policies that escalated the war on drugs and mass incarceration
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/4/25/18282870/joe-biden-criminal-justice-war-on-drugs-mass-incarceration
Yeah Biden and Harris locked up more black men then George Wallace could even dream of. But to be fair they were super predators according to Hilary.
Lol. Yup. It’s like the plot to a bad Seth Rogan/james Franco stoner flick where they get control of the DNC, circa summer 2020.
“Dude. How we gonna beat trump?”
“I know! Biden/harris!”
“Thats so crazy it just might work! Dem voters are idiots.”
I believe that was around the same time as "super predators."
We are so fucked.
Where's that video of Senator Joe Biden praising Strom Thurmond for working with him for passing a drug law that would send crack cocaine users to prison spliced with video of Hunter Biden smoking crack cocaine? Has it been scrubbed off the internet?
"Criminal records for marijuana use and possession have imposed needless barriers to employment, housing, and educational opportunities," Biden said in a White House
They're SUPPOSED TO you gibbering moron!
Please explain the utility and/or morality of barring kids from university for smoking half a joint one time.
Do we want kids doing drugs, or do we not?
If we don't, then there HAVE to be consequences for it. No consequence means we're not taking the subject seriously.
If you do, then come right out and say it loud and proud. Say, "I think kids should absolutely be doing drugs, and I want as many young people on them as possible."
If that's what you think, then own it. If you think that's a problem, then get on board with the solution.
So...grant a pardon for possession offenses, wait for more offenses to accumulate and then give a pardon for *those,* and so on?
Or simply instruct DC prosecutors and park rangers to ignore marijuana violations?
Either way seems incompatible with the Presidential duty to executie the laws until repealed.
Why not reschedule or get a law to make possession legal in federal enclaves?
Faithfully executing the laws is not incompatible with the presidential right to pardon.
The most legally sound way to legalize drugs is for Congress to do just that, but to date the Republicans in the Senate have refused to do so. And new House Speaker Mike Johnson has a consistent record of opposing marijuana reform, so it's TBD if the new bipartisan legalization bill will even make it to the Senate this time.
Faithfully executing the laws would be to hold the DEA and FDA to the science and remove marijuana from schedule I.
He's not going far enough, so he gets zero credit.
--BernieBros and libertarians
Donald Trump wants to put pretty much everyone in camps except the utmost sycophants, laws be damned. And that's cool.
--Libertarians
lmao... Your delusions get funnier all the time.
Never-mind the last 6-years of feeble attempts to lock Trump up ... Oh no; Trump is the one who wants to lock-up everyone into camps... /s
UR such a joke. Leftard projection day-in and day-out.
Libertarians do not support the Orange Supremacist.
Not sure why they wouldn't. He's been the most aggressive president to cut government in the last century. Anything but perfection is unacceptable or what?
See, the problem with imperfect solutions is that you have to evaluate the imperfect part to see if you can live with it. As Trump has said with his own face that he wants to be a dictator and the rules for doing what he wants are inconsequential to him ... I'm not willing to live with that, so Nikki Haley is still at the top of my deplorables list.
Busy dictating less government that is UN-Constitutional to begin with or what? What Supreme Rule has he ever violated that hasn't been literally trampled by every other president.
I think your daily Nazi-Indoctrination plays a bigger part in your evaluation than you think.