USDA Announces New Rules That Could Ease Another Baby Formula Shortage
The rules would allow the government to temporarily ease restrictions on WIC formula purchases during a shortage. But those restrictions shouldn't exist in the first place.

Last week, the Department of Agriculture announced new rules for the implementation of the Access to Baby Formula Act of 2022. The new rules seek to allow the government to temporarily waive tight restrictions on formula purchases made with Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) funds during emergencies and future baby formula shortages.
In February 2022, Abbot Nutrition, the largest baby formula manufacturer in the United States, announced that it was recalling three popular brands of baby formula following complaints of bacterial contamination at a manufacturing facility in Michigan. The supply shock that followed was worsened by already existing pandemic-era supply chain issues. Within months, out-of-stock rates in 10 states had climbed to over 90 percent.
Making matters worse, restrictive labeling regulations by the Food and Drug Administration and heavy tariffs made importing formula produced in the European Union practically impossible. Low-income families who used WIC to buy formula were particularly affected by the shortage, because states hand out lucrative, exclusive contracts to a single baby formula manufacturer, meaning WIC users can only buy formula from the single company their state is contracted with.
In May 2022, Congress passed the FORMULA Act, which temporarily lifted heavy tariffs on baby formula imports. The change allowed massive imports of foreign formula, easing the shortage. That same month, the Access to Baby Formula Act of 2022 was also passed, which would allow the government to temporarily waive restrictions on WIC purchases of baby formula.
Last week, the USDA finally released proposed rules concretely implementing the directions in the law. According to the proposed rule, the secretary of agriculture would gain the permanent ability to waive WIC rules during an officially declared period of emergency and 60 days after the emergency period. The rule also requires that state WIC contracts with formula manufacturers include explicit remedies in the case of a formula recall. Importantly, new contracts will allow WIC users to purchase other companies' formulas if the contracted company experiences a recall. Additionally, the new rules would require state WIC agencies to create a plan for "alternate operating procedures" in the case of a shortage or another emergency situation.
While these new rules will make it easier for families using WIC funds to access formula during shortages, state governments shouldn't be handing out exclusive, crony contacts to baby formula manufacturers in the first place. And while these rules might help during a shortage, the government would do well to remove the massive tariffs on baby formula to prevent another shortage in the first place.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I thought increased access to abortion was what would alleviate the shortage. And shouldn't mothers be breastfeeding anyway?
What about chestfeeders?
You misogynist! You savage white supremacist!
Not everyone who wants to breastfeed even can. Some mothers just don't produce milk, or produce enough milk, for their children.
Don't worry. Once the 'vermin' who are 'poisoning the blood of the country' are dealt with, then there will be plenty of baby formula for the hardworking patriotic Americans who deserve it.
Am I doing that right?
Not in the least.
Oh you're right. It wasn't as faithful to the Hitler style guide as it should be.
Jeff is bullshitting again.
He loves illegals.
Very touching.
Especially the pedophiles.
Really, dipstick? I'd tell you to go fuck yourself, but I sincerely doubt you can reach that far.
Repeat after me:
It was wrong for Trump to accuse any migrants, illegal or otherwise, of "poisoning the blood of the country". It was wrong for him to do so regardless of what Biden or Obama or anyone else said or did.
Can you say that in good conscience?
Try it the other way.
Instead ask "Is it right for Trump to refer to millions of
peopleillegals as poisoning the blood of the country, and do you agree that there's a lot of work ahead doing something about it?"You'll get a yes every time.
Or even this one:
"Look, we all know that the illegals are vermin who need to be rooted out. In order to rid ourselves of this poison in the blood of our country, should we use cattle cars to deport them all, or just shoot them where we find them?"
The defenders have said that "a lot of work" doesn't mean more government, because that's not the intention. That must mean government condoned vigilantism. So option b looks more likely.
And Trump really liked that Duterte guy in the Philippines who asked vigilantes to murder anyone they suspected of dealing drugs.
Wow, just wow. I am in ever-living amazement and awe of the Sarc and Jeffy Show. Do you do this circle jerk often, or am I just special enough to see it?
You can't say it, can you?
Is it because you agree with Trump that illegal immigrants are "poisoning the blood of the country"?
You've been told what it is before, dork. You're doing nothing more than sealioning.
R Mac "owned" me by saying Biden said blah blah blah first (which automatically justifies anything Republicans do), that Trump's wall will catch the illegals already in the country, and that I didn't read the article carefully enough.
Boom! Trump defended!
It's spelled "pwned" and doesn't need the quotes.
I gave him a pat on the back and three attaboys since he was obviously pleased with himself.
And you're not exactly telling the truth about that exchange.
Really? He pulled a Biden quote out of his ass and that justified whatever Trump said. He said Trump will catch illegals already in the country by doing what he was doing, which was building a wall. And he got sooo excited that I went by the headline and top few paragraphs without reading all the way to the bottom that I had to congratulate him. I would have patted him on the head but that would be too close to his teeth.
Because the quote came from a Biden staffer, you nit, not from Trump.
The Hitler quote did, not the Trump quote. Doesn't make Trump's words any less chilling. Saying there's a lot work to take care of millions of people poisoning the blood of the country. You think that means building a wall or hiring a couple more border agents?
Other countries tried lowering birth rates. It didn't work there.
The problem is once again single sourcing.
Are you talking about the basket of deplorables?
I remember when discourse like that was considered unacceptable and inexcusable. Do you?
Se am I supposed to agree here that Hillary Clinton is in fact a Nazi-- aside from her economic ideals?
Perhaps you might agree that this type of discourse is crap and it ought to stop, and not just when you or your tribe are on the receiving end.
Yea, let’s censor everyone.
Instead of giving one guy or office the permanent ability to temporarily waive some of the rules in specific circumstances only (emergencies), wouldn't it be better to figure out which of these rules we could probably just live without, and remove them permanently?
What a novel idea. Worth trying.
Now you are doing it right.
Except Jeff would open the border completely. He is an advocate for importing pedophiles from other countries.
The utopian idea of opening the border is more realistic than paring back the welfare state. So we agree to disagree, open the border AND keep the expansionist welfare state. Because #1 is a realistic and achievable goal, but #2, too far, dude, too far.
Nonsense. He doesn't want the competition. Now, he is in favor of importing undocumented children...
That's only what libertarians have been saying for like ever. Problem is that Democrats say we're hardcore conservatives when we don't like their rules, and Republicans say we're hardcore leftists when we don't like their rules. And they both really believe it.
The rules would allow the government to temporarily ease restrictions on WIC formula purchases during a shortage. But
those restrictionsWIC and price supports on dairy products shouldn't exist in the first place.FTFY
Why is it on sale if there is a shortage?
Every tariff's sacred, every tariff's great
If a tariff's wasted, Trump gets quite irate
Baby formula could be cut with the vaxxes being discarded.
No, they'll get mixed in with the new *checks notes* Trivalent vaccine that will protect you from Alpha, Delta AND Omicron!
Now with 10% fewer blood clots!
Remember that day the Constitution was ratified to allow the federal government to have 'access' to food bills?
Yeah; me neither.....
F'En [Na]tional So[zi]alist[s].
American boobies need to produce more milk.
The boobies in Gummint need to stop "helping" us with price supports on dairy and let prices either bust-bust or boom-boom according to supply and demand. Then free individuals can either buy more or create substitutes as needed and the Free Market can just motorboat us all to prosperity and a happy ending.
🙂
😉