What J.D. Vance Could Learn From Reading Hillbilly Elegy
The senator used to know why the U.S. Steel/Nippon deal is nothing to fear.

In Chapter 4 of Hillbilly Elegy, the Rust Belt memoir that launched his political career, Sen. J.D. Vance (R–Ohio) relates a story about the time that Kawasaki bought out Armco, the steel-making company that once employed Vance's "Papaw."
Kawasaki is, of course, based in Japan. At first, Papaw and the other residents of Middletown, Ohio—described by Vance as "a town full of World War II vets and their families—react to the news as if "General [Hideki] Tojo himself had decided to set up shop in southwest Ohio." Once the initial fervor dies down, however, Papaw and the rest of the Middletown community recognize that the foreign company's investment in their local community can be a good thing. "The Japanese are our friends now," Papaw tells Vance.
"The Kawasaki merger represented an inconvenient truth: Manufacturing in America was a tough business in the post-globalization world," Vance writes. "If companies like Armco were going to survive, they would have to retool. Kawasaki gave Armco a chance, and Middletown's flagship company probably would not have survived without it."
There's another lesson that a reader might draw from Papaw's reaction to the Kawasaki takeover as well: It doesn't make much sense to apply geopolitical thinking to the world of business. Yes, the Japanese are "our friends now," but there's also a world of difference between an imperial war machine and a multinational corporation that wants to pay you wages for work.
On Monday, another Japan-based company, Nippon Steel, announced that it would be purchasing another struggling American steelmaking company, U.S. Steel, in a deal reportedly worth $14.1 billion.
Upon hearing the news, Vance did not exactly follow his Papaw's example. "Today, a critical piece of America's defense industrial base was auctioned off to foreigners for cash," thundered Vance in an official statement. "Rest assured that I will interrogate the long-term implications for the American people, and I will do everything in my power to protect the future of our nation's security, industry, and workers."
It seems that Vance has forgotten that the Japanese are our friends now, not shady "foreigners" invading crucial American industries. Perhaps he's also unaware that Nippon Steel has operated in the United States for 40 years, and that the company already owns two smaller American-based steelmakers: Standard Steel and Wheeling Nippon Steel, according to Reuters.
Maybe he can pick up a copy of Hillbilly Elegy and learn that other lesson too. There's absolutely no reason to apply silly geopolitical thinking to this transaction, especially when both U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel are publicly traded companies. One has a headquarters in the United States and the other has a headquarters in Japan, yes, but the truth is that both companies are owned by their shareholders—and literally anyone in the world can buy shares in either.
(Cynically, one might note that the Nippon deal means U.S. Steel won't be sold to Cleveland-Cliffs, another major steelmaker that had been aiming to acquire its rival. Cleveland-Cliffs, of course, is headquartered in Vance's home state of Ohio.)
Vance's reaction to the U.S. Steel announcement did serve one productive purpose, however. It is yet another illustration of how the populist right is merely recycling the flawed economic policy ideas of the far left.
For example, here's how progressive Sen. John Fetterman (D–Penn.) reacted to the news: "It's absolutely outrageous that [U.S. Steel] have sold themselves to a foreign nation," Fetterman said in a video recorded, somewhat bizarrely, on the roof of his house. "I am committed to doing anything I can do, from using my platform or my position, in order to block this."
If those statements were swapped, would you be able to tell the difference? Fetterman and Vance engage in the exact same set of fallacies, using almost exactly the same words to engage in some light xenophobia and some promises of heavy-handed government action.
Unsurprisingly, prominent figures of the so-called "New Right" jumped to praise Fetterman. "I'm starting to like this guy a lot," Compact magazine founder Sohrab Ahmari posted on X (formerly Twitter), referencing Fetterman's video statement.
This is all quite silly. America's interests are not served by having two supposedly rival political movements committed to seeing foreign investment as a threat to the country's sovereignty or American workers.
The good news is that the people on the ground—the Papaws of this story—seem to get it. "Don Furko, president of a union local in Clairton, Pa., said he was hopeful that new owners will add more workers in the region," The Wall Street Journal reported Monday. Meanwhile, both "U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel said they would honor existing contracts with union-represented workers, and that the companies agreed on the importance of investing in employees," the Journal added.
Nippon Steel is not personally owned and controlled by the ghost of General Tojo. It's a successful, publicly traded corporation with a long history of paying Americans wages for work. There's nothing sinister about this. Conservatives, especially, should understand the inevitable problems that result from mixing up geopolitics and businesses, as it only creates more opportunities for the government to stick its nose where it doesn't belong.
Maybe Vance needs another lesson from his Papaw.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Am guessing the move was strategic to comply with American Iron & Steel as well as Buy American, Build American restrictions on imported products used in publicly funded projects.
Eric needs to know that times change circumstances. Papaw’s day is very different from today.
Back then, foreigners (yes, that’s what they are) owned little of American capital and real estate. The creeping ownership of American sovereignty is larger than we think.
This is all part of "You'll own nothing, have no privacy, and be happy."
The libertarians are apparently OK with that. As long as we get maximum returns on our capital!!
Cleveland-Cliffs isn't doing so hot either. The construction of their Coshocton plant has been delayed several times over the years waiting on more funding. It's finally coming together. How do I know? I have the STAAD model of their annealing platform on my other monitor as I type this.
This is not ANY kind of "thinking" let alone "geopolitical" thinking. This reaction substitutes slogans for thinking. Set aside for a moment the fact that neither Vance nor Fetterman are likely even capable of rational thought in the first place. Thinking is NOT what gets politicians elected or re-elected these day. I can count the number of thoughtful, rational, principled politicians on the fingers of one hand lately. All they have to do to get elected in this increasingly polarized political environment these days is to run in a district that has hot-button issues and push the right buttons.
This reaction substitutes slogans for thinking.
welcome to post-truth America
And you’re one of it’s biggest adherents.
Unsurprisingly, prominent figures of the so-called "New Right" jumped to praise Fetterman. "I'm starting to like this guy a lot," Compact magazine founder Sohrab Ahmari posted on X (formerly Twitter), referencing Fetterman's video statement.
Fetterman is Ahmari's Frankensteinian Monster.
🙂
😉
"The Kawasaki merger represented an inconvenient truth: Manufacturing in America was a tough business in the post-globalization world," Vance writes.
(1) Globalization is likely going to reverse, because of the cost of maintaining international shipping, the fragility of supply chains, increasing global hostilities, and the economic and demographic failures of Europe and China.
(2) Manufacturing is largely a "tough business" in the US because US policymakers have deliberately destroyed it.
"(2) Manufacturing is largely a “tough business” in the US because US policymakers have deliberately destroyed it."
The problem there is that the ones who did it actually see the destruction as a "victory". For all their whingeing about the loss of "good factory jobs" by the left (some of which seems like it might just be motivated by thinking that factory work will translate automatically into union membership, which progressives seem to see as some kind of panacea that'll fix everything from climate change to soggy cereal), there's no way they'd be less unhappy about the "carbon footprint" inherent in the process of making steel.
So, he understood the Armco/Kawasaki deal and got it right according to Boehm's enlightened leftist standards.
But he's leery of the US Steel/Nippon deal.
Huh.
Did anyone perhaps, ever consider that maybe he has more information than Reason's 'repeat every leftist mantra' bots that pass as journalists?
That he sees an issue here that wasn't present in the previous deal?
Who knows? Be nice if someone would report on that instead of simply taking pot shots at people questioning the deal.
He has more information, yes., That he gets more political exposure and may put himself in the frame to be the VP if he comes out against such deals. He didn't have this information when he wrote HE.
There is no good capitalist reason to oppose the deal, but there certainly are political points to be gained in doing so.
And national security reasons.
I have to wonder whether the "national security" issue is really such a big deal for something like a steel mill, as long as foreign ownership is going to keep the plant operating.
It's not like the whole facility can be packed up and moved back to the "home islands", and as long as it's not going anywhere or being sold off for parts, it can always be taken back physically in the event that Japanese ownership of the plant actually creates some kind of a problem or conflict; it's not exactly in line with the 4th amendment, but in a time of war, how many U.S. Courts are going to suddenly become sticklers for the rights of a hostile power (and if Japan isn't on the opposing side, then there's still not likely to be much of a problem with them owning the thing).
Moral issues aside, possession becomes 100% of the law when there are bombs in the air.
Are you seriously suggesting that a central planning politician has more information than the business owners with skin in the game?
Are you a fucking Marxist?
Criminy. Learn some fucking economics, you moron.
Maybe Boehm recently tried Skyline Chili and is now reflexively distrustful of anything coming out of the Cincinnati region.
Did anyone perhaps, ever consider that maybe he has more information than Reason’s ‘repeat every leftist mantra’ bots that pass as journalists?
Look at Azathoth here agreeing with left-wing Senator Fetterman. Who would have thought it was possible.
How so?
Nippon Steel, announced that it would be purchasing another struggling American steelmaking company, U.S. Steel, in a deal reportedly worth $14.1 billion.
The real concern is what makes Nippon succesful to the point they can buy out their competitor, and why can't US Steel succeed on its own?
what makes Nippon succesful to the point they can buy out their competitor, and why can’t US Steel succeed on its own?
I am reminded of the joke of the economist who sees a $100 bill lying on the street but doesn't pick it up- because if it were a real $100 bill, someone would already have picked it up.
Perhaps U?S Steel was run really badly - short-term thinking, perhaps, or overly reliant on a few domestic customers and not good at marketing itself abroad. Or it may be that there's nothing particularly wrong with US steel but Nippon Steel is just that much better managed, which gives it a lower cost of funds, and US Steel becomes a much better business if it too had a lower cost of funds. Perhaps Nippon Steel calculated it was cheaper to buy an existing concern than build new plant., etc etc.
"Hey, we're flexible. Pearl Harbor didn't work out so we got you with tape decks."
Unions. Honda builds cars in Ohio. The populist right and populist left have merged horseshoed (somewhat?) on union labor. Now that the unions are supporting Hamas leftists , not sure how the breitbart right will handle the union sympathies? The socialists have traditionally looked at unions as useful idiots or property owning bourgeois and enemies of the revolution.
Japanese are successful at manufacturing because they train their workers, pay union type salaries without the dues or the defined benefit pension bureaucracy. Offer 401ks and aren’t fans of college degrees for stamping paper stacks.
The first version of the story I heard is that Nippon Steel is paying a premium over the market value of US Steel in order to position themselves in front of all the "infrastructure" spending that's been enacted by the Biden Administration.
I hope for their sake they have a good understanding of how little of the top-line numbers from the "Infrastructure" Bill and "Inflation Reduction" Act bills are actually being spent on infrastructure, and how little of that total will be going just to purchase steel. Not to mention that if they bought US Steel outright, there might be some "buy american" clauses which might prohibit any spending at all with a foreign-owned operation (and if they bust out the unions, they'd definitely be DQ'ed from even bidding on any of those purchases).
In exchange for pieces of paper they give us stuff, and then use those pieces of papers to keep Americans employed? Seems like a win-win to me.
I'm sure the lighting filters on that photo were taken completely organically and not manipulated in any way whatsoever.
"HE'S LURKING IN THE SHADOWS!!!!"
Some more random numbers:
Japanese population 125 million.
Japanese navy has 150 vessels.
Communist Chinese population 1,411,778,724.
Communist Chinese navy has 340 warships.
Communist China is A little over 400 miles from Japan.
(oddly enough, this number is not easily found on the web. I had to measure form a map)
Russian population 144 million.
Russian Navy 256 fleet units.
Russia is 26 miles from Japan.
The USA has 300 deployable combat vessels.
The USA is 8,261 miles from Japan.
As a Pittsburgher who has witnessed the collapse of the world's largest steel manufacturer (and much of Western PA's previous economy) during the past 45 years (US Steele is now the world's 27th largest steel manufacturer), I worry that Nippon Steel will shut down most of its newly acquired plants in America, move US Steel's headquarters to Japan, and manufacture more Toyotas in Japan (instead of in the US).
Why? It's cheaper to manufacture them in the US. Lower labor costs in the non-unionized South, no need to import raw materials for making steel in Japan because all of the stuff needed to make steel is already here in America.
By the way, did you know that Nippon Steel used to run a theme park? Space World, in Kitakyushu. It closed in 2017 though.
https://web.archive.org/web/20190716180544/https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/east-asia/article/2126292/2017-year-japans-space-world-reached-its-final-frontier-and
Dear Media: Can you stop with the "formerly known as Twitter" nonsense? It's been a while now. We all know what X is.
US Steel has a major plant in Braddock, PA where Fetterman was mayor. I suspect Fetterman will stop opposing the merger if Nippon promises to keep the Braddock plant open. I also suspect that, if the merger fails due to Fetterman and his buddies, U.S. Steel will eventually shut down Braddock and the town will rust away. But the voters of Penna. will keep re-electing Fetterman because "he tried to save our jobs."
Libertarians are hopeless.
Autarky is far superior to globalism. Capitalism by itself, and "free markets," will maximize profitability to the detriment of all other concerns. Clearly, there is a role for government here.
I wonder whether the writers at Reason even know the word "autarky."