Milei Begins Shock Therapy in Argentina
The self-described anarcho-capitalist president devalued the peso, halved government ministries, and announced a series of spending cuts.

When Javier Milei assumed the presidency of Argentina on Sunday, he promised to shock the country's economy to end its economic crisis. In his first acts as president, the self-described anarcho-capitalist devalued the peso, halved government ministries, and announced a series of spending cuts.
On Tuesday, Milei's new administration announced a sharp currency devaluation, weakening the peso by more than 50 percent. As a result, the official exchange rate increased from 366.5 per dollar to over 800.
After years of previous administrations forcefully slowing the peso's decline, the central bank also set a monthly devaluation target of 2 percent in an attempt to anchor inflation.
"We're always worse off because our response has been to attack the consequences but not the problem," Economy Minister Luis Caputo said in a televised address. "What we've come to do is the opposite of what they always did, and that's solve the root problem."
"For a few months, we're going to be worse than before," Caputo said, adding that the government plans to double social welfare programs to help the poor absorb the shock.
In another bold act, the chainsaw-wielding president cut the number of federal ministries by half, from 18 to nine. Only the ministries of foreign affairs, economy, security, defense, human capital, justice, infrastructure, health, and internal affairs remain. Meanwhile, the ministries of transport, public works, science, culture, territorial development and habitat, tourism, livestock and agriculture, and women's affairs were either eliminated or recombined.
Going forward, the government has announced a series of spending cuts to solve Argentina's "addiction to fiscal deficit." It plans to cut spending equivalent to 2.9 percent of its gross domestic product by reducing energy and transport subsidies and cutting security and pensions.
Other measures include reducing transfers to provincial governments, restoring personal income taxes, and increasing import taxes. With public employment accounting for 18 percent of the country's total employment, the administration also announced that it will carry out an extensive review of contracts and that contracts less than a year old will not be renewed.
Argentina's left has promised to fight against Milei's shock therapy plans. The governor of Buenos Aires, Axel Kicillof, promised to "fight boldly" against the new measures. Union founder Juan Grabois called Caputo "a psychopath" on the verge of committing "social murder."
But International Monetary Fund (IMF) spokesperson Julie Kozack welcomed the government's "bold initial actions" that "aim to significantly improve public finances in a manner that protects the most vulnerable in society and strengthen the foreign exchange regime."
"Their decisive implementation will help stabilize the economy and set the basis for more sustainable and private-sector led growth," she wrote in a statement.
The results of the shock can already be seen: Argentine sovereign bonds rose to the highest in two years after Caputo announced the measures. By Wednesday, the benchmark 2035 bond "added as much as 1.4 cents to trade at 35 cents on the dollar," according to BNN Bloomberg.
Milei's Argentina is facing rapidly rising inflation, a 40 percent poverty rate, a $43 billion trade deficit, and debt, including $45 billion owed to the IMF. To save the country's economy, Milei promised a tough pill to swallow. That is exactly what he has delivered in his first week as president of Argentina.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Good on him.
Let's hope they all have the political stomach to see it through.
I'm legitimately excited for Argentina. I will watch your career with great interest
How long before all this is blamed on Trump?
You people are a cult. No one has even mentioned Trump.
And JFree also misses the joke.
JFree's an asshole
The Don also promised to help Texas' Grand Goblin replacement for George Wallace send men with guns to enslave pregnant women into involuntary servitude (their duty to The Party). What's the use of a Monroe Doctrine if you can't send the DEA to run Latin American governments the way Putin does the Ukraine?
Right now,this is the second elected President to actually deliver on his promises,Trump being the only other.
Sounds like a remarkable balanced approach for such a bold one. Clearly, there are some rather un-libertarian actions involved during the transition that they can hopefully wean themselves off of once things stabilize.
Welfare was supposed to be a temporary measure to support people during the Depression.
Remember that government welfare is immoral because it starts by taking the fruits of people's labor and giving it to people who don't labor, depending upon a bureaucrats decision as to who qualifies to get other people's money and how much. Nothing is fair or moral about it.
Meanwhile, the ministries of transport, public works, science, culture, territorial development and habitat, tourism, livestock and agriculture, and women's affairs were either eliminated or recombined.
Oh noes! Not The Science!
There's a difference between Science, and science. If the government is involved, you can be sure it's Science.
I think you have that backward. Take a read of say the American Chemical or Physical Society these days..taken over by liberal art cultural marxists. As for Govt Science..buddy...its a money pit of often useless spending to enrich "research" that promises utopia and delivers peanuts. $100B in Fusion Reseach since 1960 and still 20 years from commercialization. Particle Physics is a money pit. Then there is every decade "war on cancer"...and so on. Govt distorts real science. From the transistor to the IC to the laser, the private sector has delivered.
And how will they manage to have a culture without a government department?
Can we send them Fauci for free?
That's genocide!
That just means that they won’t allow Fauci into their country….so OK!
“Argentina's left has promised to fight against Milei's shock therapy plans. The governor of Buenos Aires, Axel Kicillof, promised to "fight boldly" against the new measures. Union founder Juan Grabois called Caputo "a psychopath" on the verge of committing "social murder."”
Leftists are apparently the same world wide.
Yeah "on the verge of committing “social murder.”" sounds like a veiled threat of an 'Et tu, Brute?'/someone is going to die on behalf of the people situation.
Leftists are apparently the same world wide.
They are. Literally. As Douglas Murray once said about the fundamental difference between leftists and small-c conservatism: The French conservative may want something different than the British conservative, who may want something different than the Spanish conservative, where the left tends to want the same thing, everywhere, at the same time and in the same order.
They don't call it "international socialism" for nothing.
I'd prefer you use "statists or authoritarians" rather than "leftists". You're failing to include all the RINOs (a majority of Rs in Congress) who vote for the same things, while often claiming to be against them. After all the House (controlled by Rs) recently voted for big MIC spending and continuation of the FISA court for nothing in return.
Yes,"Leftist"is too kind,PC to me;Socialists,Authoritarians or plain old Commies is the proper term.
Milei Begins Shock Therapy in Argentina
Maybe it'll stop him from talking to his dog. The Libertarian Movement doesn't need any David Berkowitz "Son of Sams".
🙂
😉
Thanks for your input statist fuckbag.
He's the one who admitted he would retain the "social safety net" in Argentina and peg it's currency to Federal Reserve funny money and institute womb policing so that there will be more mouths in the "social safety net", a sure prescription for more hyperinflation and squalor for Argentina.
Yet somehow I'm the Statist asshole?
Again, your handle should be Dummy Madman, Dummy.
Sanford Dummy Reel
https://youtu.be/moYdbNXBwvk
Your first comment was nothing but an insult, the second has some substance.
""For a few months, we're going to be worse than before," Caputo said, adding that the government plans to double social welfare programs to help the poor absorb the shock."
Given the peso was devalued by over half, doubling social welfare programs means a real cut in social welfare programs. That's talking like the left who now have to explain why, and show economic truths they don't want known. It's going to undermine all their economic BS they use to sell more government to the people in spite of the fact it's not good policy.
at this point Corn Pop listening to his dog would be better for America than say the neocon globalist idiots like Blinken, Burns, Nuland, and Kaganovich.
Anarcofascist mysticism is the farthest thing from libertarian. Hayek eurotrash? (http://bit.ly/3DZrEa3)
Lenin and the Soviet commies correctly underestood in 1905 that anarco-whackjobs are a parasitic liability.
Man, I blocked you other stupid profile for this garbage. Thanks at least for outing yourself with this "Anarcofascist" gibberish. Can't help yourself I guess.
See ya.
Trying to figure out why an active move to devalue the peso would work. To make exports cheaper in order to pull in dollars? That seems rather - activist - for a long-term move to dollarization.
Hope his welfare/transfer/ safety net stuff works. I would have decentralized that authority to regions instead. Takes it out of the national currency/debt based argument going forward - much more difficult to recentralize in a next govt - and presumably locals have a much better idea how to do whatever for their own people more wisely.
Maybe to bring it in line with black market reality.
Its to make the official value of the peso match its *real* value - there's a massive disconnect between what the government says you can buy and sell pesos at vice what people are actually buying/selling them at.
The first step is looking at the world *as it is*, and not as its wanted to be. Not necessarily anything more than that.
Secondly, its to peg it to a fairly (fairly) stable currency which prevents the government from printing money willy-nilly.
And, thirdly, with it stabilized (ideally) it becomes more attractive for use outside of Argentina - makes it easier to buy imports with. I've been to many places where, once you're outside that county, no one wants that currency.
How stable is our currency? We just finished printing up a fuck-ton of "stimulus," with more on the way for "Green Energy" and foreign adventurism.
And since you said this and walked into it...
I’ve been to many places where, once you’re outside that county, no one wants that currency.
Soooo...Did Boss Hogg print his own Hogg Dollars in Hazzard County?
🙂
😉
Decentralizing welfare (or anything, really) is something you can't just do in one go - the state's need to be set up to take on those responsibilities before the central government drops them into their laps.
In Argentina there are two exchange rates: the official one (which is artificially controlled by the government) and the black market one (which more closely reflects the actual market value of the peso in dollars).
The devaluation from 400 to 800 pesos per dollar closes the gap between the two, bringing the official rate closer to the real market value. This will make imports more expensive for Argentines, but stimulate Argentinian exports (since many global markets are denominated in dollars).
JFree's an ignorant asshole.
Still, isn't this the usual Government-picking-winners-and-losers we've come to know and love (/sarc) from politicians? As far as fiscal and economic issues, Millei's just not hitting on it for me.
Chile tried libertarian politics for 40 years following the right wing coup of Pinochet. It failed in Chile:
https://truthout.org/articles/the-failed-libertarian-experiment-in-chile/
While I understand that the policies of the outgoing government were unsuccessful, I am skeptical that what has previously failed will now prove successful.
The failure of libertarian economics is the failure to account for human nature. Ambitious people will always come to dominate the socio-economic sphere of any society, regardless of the economic structure. The only way to prevent tyranny is to create a government that is not beholden to powerful people but is actually capable of providing a check on powerful ambitious people. Unbridled libertarian policies do not achieve this. A government is needed which will enable them to be successful without allowing them to take over society. I do not know that such a government has ever manifested but libertarianism does not promote such as it relies on judges who are easily corrupted. At least in the American system, you need to buy a great # of politicians & judges to fully corrupt the system. Libertarian policies make corruption much cheaper.
You need more than a high word count to make your assertion worth anything.
Cuba! Ever wonder why you see pictures of people hanging out on the beach- midday-with a fishing pole? (I guess to get more calories than rationed by the Socialists). Ever wonder why no housing has been built since the revolution? New cars, nope. Pharmaceutical discoveries, no. Technology nope.
For the rationed and the bureaucracy in charge of rationing, the Ambition of the prole is evil. Except when the ambition of socialist central planners grandkids (Castro) go yachting in the Mediterranean. The poor, as with all socialism, are little consumption items and chattel slaves on a computer screen to be rationed by the central planners accordingly.
A cite on The Socialist Revolutionary grandkids:
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/americas/cuba/article223928565.html
A brilliant Cuban doctor told me she missed the Soviet tech flooding Cuba back when it was a potential missile platform. But now that Paradise has collapsed, there is no technology in Cuba save patched-up antiques. Fear of well-deserved nuclear broiling is no longer an incentive for bootlegging foreign tech, but the island dictatorship would rather starve everyone than allow freedom to replace fear and coercion as incentive for technological progress. Old habits die hard.
Libertarian policies make corruption much cheaper.
No, they make corruption less valuable.
So Christian DEA prohibitionist Hitlerism is libertarian?
I read this morning that he has also banned protests and pickets, and will arrest parents who bring their kids to protest rallies. Is this correct? (I read the announcement in Spanish. My Spanish is decent, but there are differences in usage between Mexican and Argentinian Spanish and I almost certainly missed nuances and idioms.)
Cultural Marxists and Bolsheviks are the enemy of liberty. He should deport them...to say Ukraine where the Trotskites live in their pretend paradise.
I am genuinely interested in knowing whether or not you’re serious?
If only we can do the same in the States: Close down any federal agency created after 1960, cut defense spending in real dollars to what Ike spent when actually defending the western world from the USSR, stop all this foreign interventions, scale back the Fed to only exist to offer short term loans to banks in trouble with real assets as collateral and to clear checks. Revisit the CRA of 64 to ensure govt does not discriminate or force anyone to while allowing free exchange between willing parties. And stop all this insane sexual mutilation of kids by woke moms and teachers...
I'd like to deport all neocons back to Eastern Europe but perhaps they will get the message and leave on their own.
Some easy ways to cut defense spending:
A) shit can like 2/3rds of flag officers, we have way to many flag officers, with to much staff, doing way to little, making way to much money that should be spent on door kickers and the guys who make sure they have beans and bullets.
B) cut 80-90% of DoD civilians (which actually outnumber active duty military personnel). These jobs used to be done by soldiers, sailors etc, which comes with the extra benefit that when the Germans launch a counteroffensive in winter through the Ardennes forest (which your intelligence completely missed despite the soldiers in the field screaming that something big was brewing up) they can pick up a rifle and help hold the line. Maybe not go on the offensive but good enough to hold the line.
C) block contract buying. The Navy needs 20 destroyers, contract with Newport News or whichever company you're buying from, to purchase all twenty, over a given point of time, instead of 'we'll buy two this year, maybe another two next year, etc. This allows the builders to hire the workforce necessary, prepurchase equipment and material. Buy in bulk (which is almost always cheaper) and cuts production overrun by improving efficiency in production.
D) end use it or lose it, must spend everything budgeting. Allow units to transfer unused funds to other units that are short, allow units to bank some of their excess spending for when they actually need it. This one isn't military specific but government wise.
Remember Miley's promise to send goons with guns to shoot doctors and force pregnant women into Comstockist involuntary servitude--perinatal death rates be damned?
Remember Arnychist My Lai waving a translated copy of Lysander Spooner's "Vices are not Crimes" and talking about repealing prohibition? He promised to get rid of their central bank (which caused inflation in response to U.S. prohibitionism crashing all economies). Then he kinda sorta hinted at repealing American drug prohibition laws (that caused Crashes, Great Depressions and two World Wars). Will he push for legalizing production and trade or stick to bullying girls and helping the DEA kick in doors to shoot people?
While I love the reforms generally, having one man weild this kind of power is very scary.
I am pretty liberal (libertarian if you will, except things like selling assault rifles to toddlers), but I was sad to see the most reasonable candidate, Patricia Bullrich, thrown out of the race. She was as determined but also as pragmatic as Thatcher.
But I now think Argentina needs a radical like Milei to finally get Argentina out of a century of decline and fascist Peronism. And the reforms are pretty much exactly the right ones. Finally, he is showing more pragmatism than his rabble rousing indicates. He has avoided his radical conservatism to play out, stopped short of outright dollarization in one fell swoop, and even ramped up but also targeted and cleaned up social spending.
Like Thatcher, privatization should be next. But doing it now would see fire sales prices and the state having to assume entitlement liabilities, as with Thatcher (who cringed at doing so, but thought demonstration effects essential).
So maybe he will actually pull of the feat and stare down the parliamentary and big state opposition. For a country I love, I would wish nothing more.