Congress Prepares To Reauthorize a Warrantless Domestic Spying Program the FBI Abused
Competing FISA Section 702 reauthorization bills will reach the House floor next week, Speaker Johnson says.

Congress is gearing up for a potential showdown over the expected reauthorization of a warrantless domestic spying program that's been misused by the FBI and widely criticized by civil libertarians.
That surveillance program—authorized by Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)—was created after 9/11 with the intention of tracking foreign spies and potential terrorists. But it has predictably morphed into a way for law enforcement agencies to get a warrantless peek at Americans' phone records, emails, and other electronic communications—the FBI ran more than 3.3 million queries through the Section 702 database in 2021, according to an annual transparency report.
With the program set to expire at the end of this year, Congress has a rare opportunity to reform Section 702 by, at the very least, prohibiting law enforcement from using it to snoop on Americans. So far, that doesn't seem to be happening.
The Senate voted Thursday to advance the annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), and the 3,000-page bill contains a "clean" reauthorization of Section 702, according to Sen. Mike Lee (R–Utah), a longtime critic of the surveillance program.
"After all we've learned about the FBI in recent years, the fact that some members of Congress are still willing to reauthorize FISA 702 without reforms—not even a warrant requirement for "backdoor" surveillance of Americans—makes me wonder if they're illiterate," Lee posted to X (formerly Twitter) on Thursday.
Lee says he intends to vote against the NDAA when it comes to the Senate floor for a final vote. He likely won't be the only Republican to do so, but rolling the Section 702 reauthorization into the larger military spending bill means it will be difficult to prevent its passage.
Instead, the fight will be over the language that gets added to the NDAA. While the Senate is moving forward will full reauthorization, there are competing proposals drafted in the House.
The House Judiciary Committee approved a bill on Wednesday to reauthorize Section 702 with the added requirement that the FBI and other intelligence agencies obtain a warrant before using the program to obtain information about Americans.
"The overwhelming, bipartisan vote in favor of this legislation confirms a mutual interest in protecting our Fourth Amendment privacy rights from rogue intelligence actors," Rep. Andy Biggs (R–Ariz.), chairman of the House subcommittee on federal surveillance issues, said in a statement. "Any effort to stall consideration or pass a clean extension of the current FISA authorities is a punishment of the American people."
However, the House Intelligence Committee passed its own version of a Section 702 reauthorization on Thursday. That bill would only require that the FBI establish probable cause before searching the Section 702 database for information about Americans, Roll Call reported.
In a letter to members on Thursday, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R–La.) promised to bring both bills to the House floor next week to give lawmakers "a fair opportunity to vote in favor of their preferred measure."
With that possible showdown looming, lawmakers should keep in mind that Section 702 has vacuumed up so much information about Americans that the full scope of the program can't even be quantified, as Sharon Bradford Franklin, chair of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, an independent executive branch agency responsible for advocating on behalf of Americans' rights in national security matters, told a House committee in April.
When Section 702 was approved in 2008, it removed older provisions of the FISA law that required the government to obtain a warrant from the special FISA court before wiretapping communications between Americans and foreigners. Agencies must obtain permission from the FISA court before conducting any surveillance, but the court effectively rubber-stamps all requests and does not review specific targets.
As a result, "vast quantities of our communications are still searched and amassed in government databases simply because we are in touch with people abroad," explains the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). And the number of foreign targets keeps growing. There were 89,138 targets for Section 702 collection in 2013, the first year that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence released a transparency report about the Section 702 program (in response to outrage generated by Edward Snowden's leaks about the spy program's uses). That figure had climbed to 246,073 by 2022. More foreign targets mean more "incidental" collection of Americans' communications, and a larger database for domestic law enforcement agencies, aided by the FBI, to sift through.
There's also evidence that the FBI improperly used Section 702 databases to spy on Americans involved in the George Floyd protests, the January 6 riot, and in less high-profile situations. A Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court report unsealed in May showed that the FBI improperly used its warrantless search powers more than 278,000 times during 2021 alone.
The FBI changed its internal policies regarding the Section 702 database in 2022, but those reforms could be easily reversed unless Congress takes more serious action. The White House's Intelligence Advisory Board has recommended reforming Section 702, and called the FBI's internal changes "insufficient to ensure compliance and earn the public's trust," as Reason previously reported.
Congress will have a rare opportunity next week to rein in the federal government's warrantless spying on Americans' communications. It's an important fight, and one that's long overdue.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
They should add an amendment funding the bill by eliminating the FBI.
Both Republicans and Democrats are in disagreement with libertarians on this. Is it appropriate to say "both sides" or is this, like everything from gout to the weather, Biden's fault?
did the FBI use a fisa warrant to spy on him?
Why would it matter?
how can it be appropriate to both sides an issue when one side owns the delivery vector?
It has bipartisan support (as in both parties, or both sides) in Congress, and ownership of "the delivery vector" tends to swap every four to eight years.
Me today, you tomorrow.
Sen. Mike Lee (R–Utah), a longtime critic of the surveillance program
Rep. Andy Biggs (R–Ariz.), chairman of the House
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R–La.)
Not to mention Rand Pauls constant critic of the surveillance program.
In case you didn't notice. The opposition is 100% Republican.
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning 16,000 US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome9.com
I get attacked for "promoting the leftist narrative" by the village idiots when I say this, but I have no doubt Trump will take full ownership of "the delivery vector" and abuse it to the best of his ability should he be re-elected. And those same village idiots will be cheering him on with blood in their eyes.
You get called a leftist for pushing leftist narratives, like the Trump dictator comments, refusing to criticize the left and shitting up every thread critical of them, and joining shrike on jeff in brotherly victim hood like this morning. Being pro censorship, defending the state in masking and vaccine mandates, etc is icing on the cake.
You also cry a lot about being called everyone despite years of calling everyone else conservatives and Trump cultists.
I mean you've even defended every deep state attack on Trump himself and any other conservatives so why would people even think you're against this program?
I mean it was used against Trump in 2016 and you fully supported it while pushing Trump Russia.
How it was used here.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2018/01/14/understanding-fisa-7021617-and-how-it-was-used-in-2016/
I know I know. Biased site you won't read but has actual pictures of all the FISA applications. So you'll claim it was fake like this morning.
Here was the IC using it against Republicans again recently.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/4110850-fbi-improperly-used-702-surveillance-powers-on-us-senator/
Weird how it tends to happen more in dem administrations.
Here it being used in J6 investigations which you supported.
https://www.techdirt.com/2023/05/22/fbi-used-section-702-surveillance-powers-to-spy-on-protesters-crime-victims-and-political-party-donors/
Used against political donors.
https://www.protectprivacynow.org/news/court-bombshell-fbi-improperly-used-section-702-against-left-right-and-19000-political-donors
Pretty standard to use under Obama even against congress.
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/343785-newly-declassified-memos-detail-extent-of-improper-obama-era-nsa/
But both sides exactly equal.
I doubt the FBI would be on board with Trump. Or much of any other dept in the federal guv.
>>I have no doubt Trump will take full ownership of “the delivery vector” and abuse it to the best of his ability should he be re-elected.
his past presidency does not evince this.
"I have no doubt" ... and your 'no doubt' is found NO-WHERE but your own TDS.
Trump didn't endlessly attack and investigate and snoop on his opponents... That was the Democrats.
I mean Biden, the current president, has had his administration go and support a clean 702 reauthorization a dozen or more times this year. But can't criticize him can you.
The loudest mix of critics is both minorities of dems and reps in the House. But since you can't criticize Biden it is an everyone problem.
Im sure you were consistent in 2018 and blamed both sides as well.
https://reason.com/2023/07/11/bidens-flip-flop-on-warrantless-surveillance/
NYT is worried the GOP is going to end the program.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/03/us/section-702-spying.html
Both sides equal though.
Let me guess, at Thanksgiving dinner you were not happy with either potatoes or dressing and helped yourself to a healthy serving of both sides?
Conservatives are masochists, they like the way the Republicans spank them. Trying to get through all that mental illness and delusion requires something more than words.
Besides, when their guys spy on you it's because you really are a bad guy. Their sure of that.
Keep in mind, Trump is a serious aberration in the normal left to right turnover. The Republicans didn't want him anymore than the Democrats so they both went crazy on him. Pointing out how one of the Republicans own party boys, George Jr, abused the system makes more sense.
"Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R–La.) promised to bring both bills to the House floor next week to give lawmakers "a fair opportunity to vote in favor of their preferred measure.""
The new Speaker of the House is, with this statement alone, head and shoulders above any of the previous speakers from the last two decades or more. This was one of the key criteria for the Tea Party to stonewall recent Speaker elections - actually enabling debate on key issues instead of strongarming a personal legislative agenda. Kudos, at least so far ...
It's an indictment of our government that this is such good news.
Even the bill requiring a court finding of probable cause isn't far enough. IC had no problem getting FISA courts to stamp investigations against Trumps campaign.
To be fair, FISA courts have the authority to issue warrants with or without probable cause. There should be no special courts or administrative law judges. Only suspected crimes should be investigated and searches only based upon probable cause should be permitted.
What is the point?
Presidents since the beginning have ignored the law, and the Constitution itself, when they wanted, with little cost. John Adams pushed for the Sedition Act and used it to throw newspaper editors in jail just seven years after the First Amendment had been ratified, supposedly guaranteeing freedom of the press.
All this argy bargy about 702 is the curtain hiding the elephant no one wants to discuss -- that ordinary people need to be able to prosecute the government with something in between the ballot box and the cartridge box.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
There is no way to "be able to prosecute the government with something in between the ballot box and the cartridge box."
That's why libertarians promote limited, minimal government. We know that all power will be abused. So the only way to limit abuse of power is to limit power. Doesn't matter which party is in charge or who they promise to smite.
Though you'd never know that from reading the comments.
The hell you say. Here is just one idea.
Before any bill becomes enacted, convene a jury of 12 random "competent" adults, by which I mean no mental patients, prisoners, etc.
Put each in a room by themselves. Give each the bill in question, a pad of paper, and a pen. No erasing, no trash can. Every page torn from the pad has to go in a box for a later permanent record.
Tell them to summarize what they think the bill does.
Convene a second similar jury. Instead of the bill at stake, they are given copies of the summaries. Their job is to answer one basic question: Are these summaries consistent? Answer YES or NO.
If any single person from this second jury says NO, the bill is void and not enacted.
If all agree YES, then the bill becomes law.
And in addition, all those notes from the first jury become the basis for later interpretation of what that law means. If there is ever any court case regarding overstepping that law, convene another jury. Give them those summaries and the case at hand. If ANY of them say the case at hand violates those summaries, that is the end of the case.
No appeals from any of these juries. No Supreme Court review, no appeals of any kind. This does allow appeals from the third jury's case, but for other issues, not for whether the use violated the first jury's understanding.
Not a bad idea, though I doubt many lawyers (and most politicians are lawyers) would agree.
Ah, but when THEIR side has control these powers will only be used for good! They promise. Just don't ask what they think is good. You won't like it.
FBI could spy on folks that meet up at Olive Garden.
free breadsticks and unlimited salad with your wiretap, sir?
...the FBI improperly used its warrantless search powers...
Literally a violation of the U.S. constitution, and nothing else happened.
"Good thing that crazy Canada/UK/Australia stuff can't happen here in the good ol' US of A. We have the constitution to protect us!"
- A lot of Americans in 2020.
Why does anyone think that the Feds will actually stop their warrantless searches of American citizens even if Section 702 is not renewed? For the one year period ending December 1, 2022, the Feds made more than one million search queries on American citizens that violated Section 702. There are more than 10,000 Federal employees with access to make such queries. Have any of them been disciplined, lost their jobs or been arrested for violating Section 702? I have never heard of a single government employee to have had any negative consequence for doing so. And if there is no Section 702 they will just keep their data base going and continue to search it whenever they feel like it. Who is going to stop them? They have become above the law.
Our government is in the process of destroying our country, for our own good. All this "land of the free" and "democracy is best", are sales gimmicks with little evidence to support these contentions. The world is learning the truth.
The "democracy" is the worst. The "land of the free" can't exist inside of [WE] mob RULES! ideology. The USA is a Constitutional Union of States and that Constitution is the "land of the free" definition.
"makes me wonder if they're illiterate,"
Makes me wonder what the FBI has on them thanks to domestic spying.
Nice comment