Biden Threatens To Block GOP Plan To Send 3,000 People Back to Federal Prison
The White House cited the extraordinarily low recidivism rates among those released and the savings to taxpayers in its veto threat.

The White House has threatened to veto a Republican Senate resolution that would result in roughly 3,000 federal offenders who were released to home confinement during the COVID-19 pandemic being sent back to prison.
In a statement of administration policy released Wednesday, the Biden administration said it opposes Senate Joint Resolution 47, introduced by Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R–Tenn.) in late October. As Reason previously reported, the resolution, which criminal justice advocates say could reach the Senate floor for a vote as early as this week, would overturn a Justice Department rule allowing some federal offenders to remain under house arrest after the end of the government's COVID-19 emergency declaration.
The White House cited the extraordinarily low recidivism rate among those released to home confinement and the reduced cost to taxpayers compared to incarceration.
"Of the over 13,000 people released to home confinement under the CARES Act, less than one percent have committed a new offense—mostly for nonviolent, low-level offenses—and all were returned to prison as a result," the statement says. "Moreover, since home confinement is less than half the cost of housing someone in prison, this program has saved taxpayers millions of dollars and eased the burden on BOP staff so they can focus on the higher risk and higher need people in Federal prison."
The resolution is the latest in a battle among the Biden administration, criminal justice advocacy groups, and Republicans over the continuation of the pandemic-era policy.
In the final days of the Trump administration, the Justice Department released a memo finding that once the federal government ended its COVID-19 emergency declaration, all former inmates with remaining sentences would have to report back to prison.
Criminal justice advocacy groups began pressing the Biden administration to reverse that decision, arguing that the program had been an unqualified success and that it would be bizarre and cruel to send back people who had thrived on the outside. The White House initially declined to do so, instead announcing a clemency initiative that would have targeted only nonviolent drug offenders, leaving thousands of others, such as white-collar offenders, to return to prison regardless of their conduct. But last December, the Justice Department reversed course and issued a new memo finding that the BOP had the discretion to leave them under house arrest for the remainder of their sentences.
"It would be a terrible policy to return these people to prison," Attorney General Merrick Garland said, "after they have shown that they are able to live in home confinement without violations."
Republicans balked at the sudden change in legal opinion. Sen. Tom Cotton (R–Ark.), one of 28 Republican co-sponsors of Blackburn's resolution, wrote that the reversal "betrays victims and law-enforcement agencies that trusted the federal government to keep convicted criminals away from the neighborhoods that the offenders once terrorized."
Criminal justice advocates say there's no terror going on. Right on Crime, a conservative criminal justice reform group, wrote on X, formerly Twitter, that the resolution "will cost millions to lock up thousands of people who have been thriving with no offenses while following all the rules of electronic monitoring."
Caught in the middle of all this are thousands of people who have spent the last three years trying to put their lives back together, such as Kendrick Fulton, who was incarcerated for 17 years for a nonviolent drug offense before being released to home confinement under the CARES Act. Fulton has since gotten his commercial driver's license and steady work.
Fulton told Reason earlier this month, "We're doing better than people that are all-the-way discharged, and they wanna send us back. They know the program is a success. They know it's a win-win, and it's saving taxpayer dollars."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Leave out the ones that committed victimless crimes then release the rest of those.
The gopers didn't fight The Big Steal, and didn't fight the opening of the bastille in the first place, so of course the fake president seeks to illegally pardon them. Then again, that was the plan from the get-go, just like with illegal aliens. It ain't over til the non-White criminal wins!
"the extraordinarily low recidivism rates"
Even if that were true, it would be irrelevant. But it's not true. What is true is that non-Whites are issued millions of free crimes per year, with more and more felonies being re-defined as misdemeanors, while law-abiding Whites are re-defined as felons.
Thanks for joining Reason Rep Bowman.
How is recidivism rates irrelevant? Do you work in criminal justice?
The Big Steal®.
The brand most favored by idiots.
Idiot. The President has power to pardon anyone convicted of a federal crime.
The article's short on discrimination via victimlessness, only mentions "nonviolent drug offenders" and "white collar" as categories, plus "low level".
And replace them with the Biden administration.
Fulton told Reason earlier this month, "We're doing better than people that are all-the-way discharged, and they wanna send us back. They know the program is a success. They know it's a win-win, and it's saving taxpayer dollars.
Nothing has changed. He's still black. Therefore, he should be in prison. R's and paleo's aren't interested in woke excuses like 'saving taxpayer dollars' or 'win-win' or god forbid 'successful govt action'.
Look. Jfree with more everyone who laughs at him is racist arguments! Seems to be a pattern this morning.
And if Biden had even a single nut in his sack, he’d just pardon or provide clemency to those who have complied with the terms of the home release of the CARES Act (which is in fact the implementation of the First Step Act).
That was my thought. If he really believed this program was an unqualified success. Why waste all this time and effort on veto'ing and the like. Just pardon everyone and be done with it.
It's hilarious that yall think Biden has any convictions, ability to make decisions, or is even aware of what "he" does
He doesn’t have any convictions yet.
Nor executions, unfortunately. He and his entire family should face firing squads.
While I generally agree, the issue of executing his *entire* family does raise some legitimate questions.
Except the ones who didn't mask up right JFree?
Of course you go straight to skin color. I mean, why not start with the least plausible reason to preface your argument.
Nothing about equal application of the law? Nothing at all?
Curious.
This is entirely about the dog-whistling related to crime.
Thanks for telling everyone that you’re a dog.
There has long been a vile racist bloc among US Libertarians.
Not really. The Secret Service wasted no time infiltrating the White Camelia, Ku-Klux Klan and similar slaver collectivists by 1872. Republican nationalsocialist narcs, snoops, informants, plants and impersonators infiltrated beer and liquor entrepreneurs effectively enough to wreck the entire economy by 1930 and banking system by 1933. Nixon-Anslinger goons infiltrated Woodstock nation as the first wave of the Army of God. Since libertarians ably reshuffled the 2016 election the LP is infiltrated by EVERY force-initiating looter gang with other people's money to burn.
Sen. Marsha Blackburn, Tom Cotton and the most of the rest of sponsors* all voted for the Cares Act.
Fuck your buyers remorse. If anyone should be sent to prison it's you assholes.
*Only Thune and Lee were in office and didn't vote for it, couple new Senators like Britt, Budd, Vance get a pass (My count was 8 of them on a quick look).
This is one of those headlines where one punctuation mark inserted strategically could change the entire meaning.
He needs the space for the 2000 J6 insurrectionists he is targeting.
>>white-collar offenders
criminals who can't even Jean Valjean it are the worst of all.
"extraordinarily low recidivism rates"
Lol
99% safe and effective
Like people said above, Biden can simply pardon the ones who, on reconsideration, turn out to have received excessive sentences.
In principle, if you let someone out of prison due to an emergency situation, then once the emergency ends…back to prison he goes.
Biden could have pardoned drug offenders like Kendrick Fulton who got jobs and kept out of trouble. This would reflect badly on the initial sentence, but at least it wouldn’t tie someone’s fate to an epidemic.
But some people are in federal prison because prison is the right place for them.
A process of considering individual pardon applications would help sort the wheat from the chaff. Maybe some people who weren’t released due to COVID should have their applications considered, too.
Should we really send the message that people released from prison due to an alleged temporary emergency will never go back to prison again even after the emergency is over?
I don’t think Biden wants to grant pardons because he doesn’t want to make a mistake and find that someone he pardoned did a crime afterward. There would be a specific document naming the person, pardoning him, and then there would be Biden’s signature. Even the dullest voter could notice that. If it’s just a matter of a bureaucratic regulation, Biden appears (to dumb voters) to have kept hands off, and he can blame low-level bureaucrats.
You hit the mark. Biden doesn't believe his own words on the subject and is just trying to shift the blame for his own inaction.
If he gave a fuck, he would pardon them.
I’m dubious. There’s a pretty clear paper trail linking him and Hunter to bribery and influence peddling with agents of corrupt and belligerent foreign governments and the general policy, apparently keeping him from sub-35% approval ratings and impeachment talk, has been not to breathe a word about it.
I’m pretty sure it’s purely the background malevolence of the leviathan. Someone above said “If he really believed…”, this is an misestimation. If he *barely* believed what he was saying (replace ‘he’ with ‘his handlers’ as necessary), he would pardon everyone or a large portion of them. If he *really* believed, he would pardon them, de/reschedule the root of the majority of their drug convictions, and go full ‘shall not infringe’ EO on any non-violent/procedural weapons violations (as well a few more potential ideas I’m not considering). It’s pretty clear that the Congressional court jesters aren’t going to seriously oppose him with a complicit media composed of “Moderate TDS sufferers” like Sullum on the fence about these issues and/or in his pocket.
But, that’s not what we’re getting, we’re getting the status quo of “We should let ‘innocent’ people out of prison.” from one side of his mouth and “Hell yes I’m going to turn innocent people into criminals for legal activity that doesn’t hurt anyone! You’d need an F-18 and maybe a few nukes to stop me.” in a rather plain “I don’t give a shit about anyone up to and including all of humanity as long as it keeps me in office and my party and aligned bureaucrats in power.”
If he pardons them, then there sentence is commuted and they wouldn't be on parole or home monitoring. These people are still under the auspices of the criminal justice system until their sentence is discharged. If one of these currently released people commits a new offense, they go back to prison on the previous sentence. If they are pardoned and commit a new offense, they do not.
So if you oppose Biden's stance here, can you explain why pardoning is better?
Yes, Trump released them from prison, so Biden must put them back in. It's all beautifully logical.
Idiot. This IS a form of commutation. Which he has the power to do.
Get out of DC.
Fire KMW.
Talk liberty first, pragmatism second.
For fuck's sake, why no outrage that all these shenanigans take place by executive fiat? Aren't we supposed to be a nation of laws, not men?
Why didn’t Pravda investigate Stalin?
And stop trying to sell liberty to progressives. They ain't buying.
The law is that the President can pardon or grant clemency to anyone convicted of a federal crime.
NOW he wants to save tax dollars?
I call bullshit.
Parole Board chairman : They've got a name for people like you H.I. That name is called "recidivism." Parole Board member : Repeat offender!
America, land of incarceration. The biggest threat to American freedoms is not Russia, China, al Qaeda, it's the American government.
Most of the incarcations are by states not the federal government.
New York started emptying out prisons about a dozen years ago and violent crime rates plummeted. But the right wing nutjobs commenting here don’t care about public safety.
Republican girl-bulliers and looter prohibitionists fer shoor. Take cross-dresser Republican George Santos, f'rinstance. Santos declared his avowed opposition to the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision by the Supreme Court, which recognized an individual's right to terminate a pregnancy. That moral claim was spelled out in the 1972 Libertarian platform: "We further support the repeal of all laws restricting voluntary birth control or voluntary termination of pregnancies during their first hundred days."
From what I can glean from the article these people are subject to electronic monitoring which probably explains the low recidivism rate if that claim is true. I don't really have a problem with that status quo and as others have noted above, a blanket pardon fraught with potentially damaging political consequences for the regime is a non starter. But what about the people sentenced under the same guidelines for the same crimes after senile Joe declared an end to the Covid emergency scam? Can they not make the case that they are not getting equal treatment of law? Under what logic can they be imprisoned while people convicted of the exact same crimes in the exact same courtrooms are not? Even libertarians should agree that equal application of law applies here.
Exactly. What makes these offenders special, because they must be special to receive special treatment one might think.
I'm no fan of petty laws that turn otherwise law abiding citizens into felons for victimless crimes, but I don't pretend everyone in prison fits that description either and if we agree as a community that 'X' is a crime, you shouldn't get special treatment for spurious whims of the current day politics.
No matter which way you cut that, legislative action is the correct remedy not pardons or 'special circumstance' pleading by the President.
BYODB Re your:
"if we agree as a community that ‘X’ is a crime, you shouldn’t get special treatment for spurious whims of the current day politics"
I don't remember agreeing that getting caught smoking green flowers, or eating the wrong mushrooms on a pizza three times running should land anyone in a cage for the rest of their life, no parole possible, plus twenty.
But pResident Joke Bitem does. That's why that cocksucker wrote and sponsored all those sadistic drug laws. Which is in turn why, even though I voted for Gary in 2016, and JoJo in 2020; I am still grateful for Trump's signing of the senator Mike Lee's First Step Act and the mostly awful CARES act. Those two laws let about 30,000 people out of their good-ole-Joe torture sentences. Credit where credit is due, and gratitude is good for MY soul.
Joe is concerned about the cost to taxpayers? Covid has been over for how long? Why weren't these people rounded up long ago? Commercial drivers license, steady work? Doesn't sound like home confinement to me.
Home confinement means you are at home with some kind monitoring device attached to you. You are able to leave home for work, school or religious services, but all of those need to be pre-approved by the Bureau of Prison.
Is C.J. a blogger or reporter? What is this? Amateur Night at Reason HQ?
Every night is amateur night.
How did someone on "home confinement" get a commercial drivers license and driving job?
Home is where the heart is?
Home confinement means you are at home with some kind monitoring device attached to you. You are able to leave home for work, school or religious services, but all of those need to be pre-approved by the Bureau of Prison.
And it varies from state to state, but I know, first/secondhand (former license holder who worked with, non-federal, convicts), that generally as long as the crime isn’t (like) murder or vehicular manslaughter, both of which would bar him from release (AFAICT), the state will issue you a CDL with appropriate training.
I'd love to see Dementia Joe try to say "recidivism."
He could just say; “Hunter”.
I'd love to see the Big Orange One try to say it too, without a teleprompter.
Shouldn't it be illegal to consider the race of the offender when deciding sentencing? What happened to the 14th Amendment? It seems like an obvious Equal Protection violation, in possibly the worst way to deny equal protection, when doling out prison time.
"The White House cited the extraordinarily low recidivism rate among those released to home confinement and the reduced cost to taxpayers compared to incarceration."
But not *zero* recidivism rate. So fuck 'em, back in the cooler.
And for some mysterious reason, you don't blame Trump for putting them on the streets in the first place.
Kendrick Fulton, who was incarcerated for 17 years for a nonviolent drug offense before being released to home confinement under the CARES Act. Fulton has since gotten his commercial driver’s license and steady work.
1. This is really confusing – as JAFO asked: “How did someone on ‘home confinement’ get a commercial drivers license and driving job?” This should be explained in the article.
2. Isn’t this type of work release much better than home confinement or return to prison? I would suggest that any reprieve from returning the former inmates to prison could be conditioned on them finding and holding down jobs. It’s better for society and it’s better for the former inmates and their families.
Are they legal people or illegal people?
^How the leftard thinks and self-projects.
Outside of leftarded-land people choose to DO illegal and/or legal acts like invading another nation uninvited.
Idiot. It isn't a crime to be in the US illegally.
I guess breaking into your house isn't a crime either then huh?
Over a period of 1-year. The 10-year rate is....
"Ten years after release, 82% of state prisoners had been arrested again—an average of nearly seven arrests each."
Not to mention; releasing earlier just heightens that.
"offenders incarcerated for more than 120 months were estimated to be approximately 30 percent less likely to recidivate than those serving shorter periods"
https://www.ussc.gov/research/research-reports/length-incarceration-and-recidivism-2022
I'd like to see magical wands of a more just justice system but I'm just not seeing anything here but a 12-month post-jail withdrawal from criminal mindsets.
The White House cited the extraordinarily low recidivism rate among those released to home confinement and the reduced cost to taxpayers compared to incarceration.
The government’s argument is sound. I know that there’s a twisted element in our society who enjoys inflicting suffering upon others. Most of them are Republicans, who run to the polls, not to improve our quality of life, but to reduce the government into an expression of their own pettiness: kick those immigrants out; get those people off welfare; lock up those criminals for longer times; kill the people on death row; that sort of thing is what motivates them. It’s always about getting the government to do something to someone else, make those other people feel their irrational self-righteous wrath.
But in this case, the motives of the government are good, and their argument is sound. There is no rational counterargument. Some of the comments below are just ridiculous, one person even saying it's part of some big plot. If the people who’d been put under house arrest have remained law-abiding citizens, clearly the time they did spend behind bars was reformative. Let’s take that as a win, and let them live, and recover what’s left of their lives. It’s still not going to be easy for an ex-convict, because they have a record. They'll be lucky to find a place to live. What a country!
I know that there’s a twisted element in our society who enjoys inflicting suffering upon others. Most of them are Republicans
We don’t need you to demonstrate to us that you are oblivious to the actual twists that many of these people are in prison to begin with thanks to Biden’s own, named and proclaimed, policies *or* that it was Trump(R)'s signature that got them out. It’s enough to just say “I think Biden is right.” to clarify that you aren’t in touch with the same reality the rest of us are. We all already see and see through the empty “OMG! EVUL RETHUGLIKKKANZ!” virtue signalling you use to cover your misanthropy and self-loathing.
"It’s always about getting the government to" ... Ensure Individual Liberty and Justice for all.
Mr. Armed-Theft Anarchist... Republicans have no desire to improve criminal livelihoods that steal(welfare) and kill others. You got that right. Because most crimes take Liberty or Justice from other innocent victims. And for the victimless crimes. That is a law changing issue not a 'ignore' the law because I was clean for 360-days.
There are Gentlemens Agreements that arm-twist Monroe Doctrine colonies into--not just murdering their own citizens to please the congressional Kleptocracy--but also disallowing migration by Americans convicted of twigs and seeds who seek to live elsewhere and escape Hoover-Anslinger-Nixon-Reagan-Bush mystical jihadists. It's The Scarlet Letter, only updated to 1914 witch-burning.
Once upon a time, Congress passed a simple to understand law regarding home confinement during the pandemic. The BOP read it and '...concluded that it would be unprecedented to allow section 3624(c)(2) home-confinement placements to last years or even decades, and thus that Congress would not have “fundamentally altered the structure of home confinement beyond the emergency circumstances” without clearly saying so...'
Now the communist bureaucrats are at it again, claiming, they, not Congress, get to say what a 'clear' law says.
Wrong. Long Dong, Gorbashuch, Mutterkreuz mom, KKKavanaugh and Palito are the ones empowered for life to say the 15th Amendment absolutely NEVER said females had a right to vote, and that forcing women to squeeze out Hitlerjugend even if it kills them is NOT slavery or involuntary servitude.
You have to love Reason's audacity. They claim to be a Libertarian site, yet they are firmly in the hip pocket of the Liberal Socialists. The intent all along was for these people to go back to finish their sentences, yet when it time for that to happen it's the evil Republicans that are responsible.
If this is ever needed again, good luck at getting it through.
Why doesn't Biden and the Democrats in the Senate just change the petty laws for shorter times for *everyone* charged with victimless drug offenses?
Oh yeah; If it isn't about lying, cheating (the law) or stealing they're just not interested I guess. Make the BS laws then cheat them when the time serves them. The most basic instinct of lawless rulers.
The white collar criminals are the worst of the worst. They steal trillions of dollars from their victims. They ruin retirements, they hide the funds and or use them for extravagances and leave widows and retirees penniless.
Yet they receive lower sentences than someone found with drugs. Some of these white collar criminals do more damage than drug dealers do.
I believe that white collar criminals need to be sentenced to one year in prison for every "average American annual wage stolen or destroyed". Minimums would be the statutory, maximum would be required at one year for every $60,000 stolen or destroyed in value without parole available. Example, Maddoff would have been sentenced to mandatory 1 million years in prison. Bankman Fried, 167,000 years in prison mandatory. Carbonak Hacking group, a total of 16,700 years in prison mandatory.
Bottom line, the Feds need to pick up every white collar criminal and return them to finish their full sentencing, they are the worst of the worst.
Is the recidivism rate truly so low? Or is the DOJ, like state and local Soros prosecutors, ignoring many crimes?
Aside from that, I would like to see most nonviolent criminals serving their sentences by house arrest with very close monitoring and conditions onerous enough that the only ways this is easier for the convicts than prison are things that are very helpful in rehabilitation - staying in touch with family and holding a job.
Note to Mexican
and Ecuadorianreaders: The looter kleptocracy defines “drug offender” as anyone with a seed in the ashtray, or who watched someone pass a joint at a concert and failed to screech “POLICE” that minute and swear out a complaint. American/CHIcom shoot-first looter prohibitionism is again in effect in Ecuador, since the latest foreign puppet took office, so “dolarisados” are getting what they bargained for. Entreguistas!