Jeb Bush on Why Florida Thrives: 'We Don't Try To Micromanage People's Lives'
Former Gov. Jeb Bush makes the case for why "Florida works pretty good."

A native Texan, Jeb Bush moved to Florida in 1980. He was governor of the Sunshine State from 1999 to 2007, where he quickly became known as a champion of school choice. In 2016, he made an unsuccessful run for president. Now he resides in Miami-Dade County, retired from political life. A self-proclaimed "old-school conservative with libertarian blood running through my veins," Bush is frustrated by the "cyclical world" we live in where "people are very comfortable with advocating government solutions to everything."
Reason's Nick Gillespie spoke with Bush in October about how Florida has become home for many people—from in and outside of the U.S.—who are looking for less government intervention in their everyday lives.
Reason: Florida has become the fastest-growing state in the country. What explains Florida's growth as a destination for people wanting to move there, live there, and work there?
Bush: I think Florida works pretty good. Whatever problems we have pale in comparison to other states. No disrespect to the Northeast, but if you have business up there like I do, and you go and you drive, you're going to get a broken back basically trying to go from here to there. The infrastructure is decayed; the challenges are immense. And you come here and the roads are working; they've got a lot of people on them but fewer potholes. Things work better.
For people that come to visit, they can kind of get the allure of Florida. Typically what happens is they visit a few times and then they say, "All right, I'm making the move. I'm going to get a job."
Both Texas and Florida, two states that have become reliably red, are now kicking the butts of New York and California. These four states are the most populous states in the country. Is there something going on with the political systems in Florida and Texas that are making them better?
Totally. Miami-Dade County, where I live, has 2.5 million people. It's a big, urban, teeming place full of diversity. It has a 1.4 percent unemployment rate. It's full of opportunities. The tax code matters, obviously, for people with more wealth. We don't have income tax. We have smaller governments. The impulse isn't to try to tax your way to prosperity or regulate your way to prosperity. It's not a perfect place, for sure. I get nervous about bragging too much because the minute you stop challenging basic assumptions about the role of government, atrophy sets in, and government just starts filling the seams.
We've had a great run because we've had a period of limited government and we don't try to micromanage people's lives. As long as we do that and we stay focused on the important long-term things: making sure infrastructure stays up with the growth, making sure our natural systems are protected, which is an important conservative principle in my mind. We could rape and pillage the swamplands around South Florida, and you would have a hell of a problem going forward. So investing in these long-term things, which they don't do in California and New York because 20–30 years ago, they made obligations to the unions and obligations in the here and now that created a government that is far bigger than it is in Texas or Florida.
How is the state of Florida's education system?
In Chicago or Washington, D.C., or New York, they spend $25,000 per student. How much of that is basically to pay for the sins of the past? Pension obligations that were negotiated, health care benefits for retirees. How much of that is actually going to the classroom? Compare that to Florida, where people in the past didn't do that.
When I was governor, we eliminated tenure. We moved to an option for a defined contribution plan rather than a defined benefit. The pension is well-funded compared to other states. So you can focus on the here and now in education. Our funding, while it's less than the national average in terms of classroom education, I think is pretty good. And then we didn't just accept the status quo; we graded schools. If schools were failing, parents were given options. We eliminated social promotion. We created real robust accountability. We put a real focus on early childhood literacy, and we created the most expansive public and private parental choice programs in the country.
The result is parents here in Miami-Dade, the third- or fourth-largest school district in the country, 70 percent of the parents decide where their kids go to school. Think of that. Would Los Angeles be better? Would Chicago be better? Would New York be better under that system? Hell yeah, it would.
It's not a surprise for me that if you empower parents, you're going to get a diversity of offerings. And if you have accountability around that and parents understand where their kids stand, you're going to get a great result. For the elite families, everything's going to be fine, because they're the first teachers of their kids. They tutor their kids; they pay for tutors; they do all this stuff to protect their kids and help them learn. But what about the 90 percent of families that don't have that luxury? You better make sure your schools are vibrant and focused on the future.
Particularly in the lower-income communities, kids of color, kids with learning disabilities, we're top five in the country based on the nation's report card. There's still a long way to go. Then, I would add, the University of Florida is a top two or three public university in the country in terms of entrance rates, in terms of research, and in terms of graduation rates. And it's free. Don't get Bernie Sanders upset about this, but we actually have Bright Future Scholarships. So anybody who qualifies for that does not pay tuition. And if you do pay tuition, it's about the lowest tuition in the country—maybe second-lowest. That's a pretty good deal. It's about the best deal a family will ever get from the government, to be able to get a high-quality education.
Does legislation under the current governor, Ron DeSantis, like the Stop WOKE Act, which affects higher education as well as K-12, concern you?
It concerns me a little bit. I do think that if you're in fourth grade or below you shouldn't be accessing any discussion of sexual orientation. If your parents decide that after school, they can talk all they want about that stuff.
Look, the governor is a master at virtue signaling, but so is the left. We're in this virtue-signaling food fight. I'm not sure the substance of the bills that have passed has created a dangerous place for speech. But I do think we have to be vigilant about it. It's one thing to say, "You can't impose these woke cultural values on everybody," which I think is an issue. It's another thing to say, "Well, therefore, we're going to impose our values on everybody."
I'm kind of an old-school conservative with libertarian blood running through my veins. I think what we need to find is an environment where we let people have an honest discourse. And if you believe what I believe, you should have a right to discuss it and defend it. The people that you disagree with aren't the enemy. They just might be wrong. Have an open dialogue. I think our universities are pretty good at that compared to other places where we're seeing right now. If you're a Jewish kid going to one of these elite schools, you're in danger. I mean, that is ridiculous what's going on. So both sides have these impulses that I think I'm uncomfortable with, but I would say the left is probably much worse than the right.
Do immigrants, whether they're from outside the country or within the country, bring their values with them to Florida?
It's always been a concern that all these people, wherever they come from, bring their values. But think about it. If someone's leaving California, they're leaving for a reason. They're probably leaving because they want economic opportunity for themselves and their families, or they're tired of being taxed to death.
In Miami-Dade County, 65 percent, maybe 70 percent, of the people were born outside of the country. There is nothing like it in the rest of the country. And these are patriotic people. They believe in freedom. They've left oppressive regimes. They're concerned when they see policies that try to impose a heavy hand of government. It's chaotic. It's diverse. It's fun. And it adds a dynamism that is really remarkable. It's the principal reason why I moved in 1980, and it's even better now.
You and your brother [former President George W. Bush] were, in many ways, a dying breed of pro-immigration and pro-immigrant Republicans. What has happened to the Republican Party that it has veered so far away from seemingly having anything good to say about immigrants?
I think there are a lot of Republicans that are pro-immigrant. But look, the reason why people are angry is the systems that we've relied on, the institutions we've relied on, haven't worked. We can't enforce our existing laws as it relates to immigration. People get upset. I think it's legitimate. You have the avalanche of fentanyl coming into our country and the tragedy that brings. What institution is working the way it should in the 21st century?
There is a deep resentment that the elites are doing quite well. I'm blessed. I've got a healthy family, an intact family. I'm in business in a way that I can add value. I've got a great life, and a lot of other people do too. But there are a ton of people, they're one paycheck away from real hardship, and the system hasn't been working for a lot of those folks. And so you try to find scapegoats. Whether you like President Trump or not—I'm not a big fan—he has tapped into that anger better than any politician in the last generation.
Does the Republican Party need to go libertarian in order to win the future?
Look, I'm out of politics. I guess I'm so old-school that I think believing in freedom and limited government and entrepreneurial capitalism—rather than picking winners and losers and doing it through government—is the path forward. I've always believed that.
Did you think after 2000 you would be seeing the rise of anti–free trade people and anti-immigrant people on both the Democratic side and the Republican side again?
In 2000, I didn't see it. I didn't see it when I was governor either. This has happened maybe in increments, not discernible to the naked eye. We're not in a linear world. We are in a cyclical world, and the cycle right now is people are very comfortable with advocating for government solutions to everything.
Now, another reason why I love Florida is the contagion hasn't spread to other places. We're AAA bond-rated, and we don't have an income tax. Under Gov. [Rick] Scott, I think they reduced the state debt by 70 percent. There was no debt issued in the eight years that Rick Scott was governor. What other state did that in a high-growth situation? I certainly didn't. Charlie Crist didn't do it. I don't know if Gov. DeSantis has, but there is a way to show that you can pursue limited government ideas and balance the budget, create reserves, deal with hurricanes all the time, not have a bloated government, and put the people that are most vulnerable in the front of the line. That philosophy still exists here.
Let's talk about the concept of the Florida Man: a person—it's usually a man, it can be a woman—doing incredibly insane, stupid things often after snorting whatever was around. That has become ubiquitous over the past decade. What do you make of the Florida Man meme?
Look, it's probably not fair, but who cares? It's funny. We should embrace it. We're striving to have a disproportionate number of candidates for the Darwin Awards each year. We should be very proud of it. To all the people laughing at Florida because of that: I'll take our tax structure, I'll take our environmental policy, I'll take our education system. I'll take our way of life, and I'll be OK.
This interview has been condensed and edited for style and clarity. You can watch the full video interview here.
Photo credits for video: JOE BURBANK/KRT/Newscom; MIKE EWEN/KRT/Newscom; Keiko Hiromi/Polaris/Newscom; Alberto E. Tamargo/Sipa USA/Newscom; Michael Bush / UPI Photo Service/Newscom; St Petersburg Times/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Kyle Mazza/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; White House/CNP/ZUMA Press/Newscom; KEYSTONE Pictures/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Pedro Portal/TNS/Newscom; Abaca Press/Gripas Yuri/Abaca/Sipa USA/Newscom; Jeff Malet Photography/Newscom; KEVIN DIETSCH/UPI/Newscom; Paul Hennessy/Polaris/Newscom; ABDEL MEZA / Notimex/Newscom
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I love that the picture you chose was him in the Jeb! wins meme pose.
I’am making over $20k a month working online. I kept seeing how some people are able to earn a lot of money online, so I decided to look into it. I had luck to stumble upon something that totally changed my life. After 2 months of searching, last month I received a paycheck for $19683 for just working on the laptop for a few hours weekly. And best thing is..It’s so Easy…
.
.
.
HERE———————≻≻≻≻≻ https://Www.Salarypay5.com
Jeb was known as the "smart one" of the Bush sons. Naturally Americans elected the other one twice.
You're just pissy that the establishment got crushed by Trump, and it eats you from the inside out, there, doesn't it, Shrike?
No surprises neocon and oligarch fluffer Buttplug is a Jeb! fan.
Pluggo prefers the younger Bush.
turd lies. That's not a surprise to anyone who reads his constant stream of bullshit.
But it's becoming obvious that as Misek is too stupid to understand the concepts of "evidence" or "relevance", the concept of "honesty" is simply beyond turd's ken.
Is Jeb the best of the Bushes because he was never elected President? Or was he never elected President because he was the best of the Bushes?
Well he didn't start any wars so he's a bit of an outlier in the family.
Bush me once. shame on you.
Bush me twice, shame on me.
Bush me thrice, not gonna happen.
I think we learned that lesson because we only put up with one Clinton regime. No matter how much she cried that the election was stolen and her supporters rioted the weeks away.
Somehow HyR's trying to make it that the GOPe is more libertarian than the MAGAs, and who could be more GOPe than a Bush, huh?
Why anyone would trust a Republican after they've frittered away their presidencies and majorities?
in 2015 i was with a bunch of friends and they were all arguing over the potential election and they all agreed, "ANYONE but Jeb Bush" and then they got Trump and they thought the world was going to end.
ANYONE but Jeb, ,I agree
Florida absolutely has a solid argument for being the #1 most libertarian-friendly state in America today. At worst it's #2 if you want to say that New Hampshire is still #1 (it's certainly close between the two). Which of course explains why so many members of the Reason staff live in the Sunshine State!
Wait, hold on one second, upon further review and deeper fact checking, it turns out that in fact no one on the Reason staff lives in Florida, most of them actually live in New York, California, or DC (the sour dreggy bottom of the libertarian friendly list in pretty much every category).
South Dakota was ranked the 3rd freest state in the nation. Funny none of the Reason staff live here since their business could easily be done by remote workers.
How many establishment cocktail parties are held in SD?
Umm... we add tomato juice to our light beer.... is that a cocktail?
'We Don't Try To Micromanage People's Lives'
But we do micromanage what businesses and universities do.
DeSantis has over-reached on the virtue-signalling. But his policies have cause almost no damage.
Now do: NY, CA, DC, Chi, Phil, Det, Portlandia, Seattle, Minneapolis, LA, etc etc. They are all becoming shit-holes, or are already there.
That's not enough for steaming piles of lefty shits, right, steaming pile of lefty shit?
Are we absolutely certain this is really Jeb? This does not sound like Jeb at all. Where was this Jeb in 2015 and 16?
So dreamy.
Please clap.
I've seen similar with a number of GOPe types. They can say a lot of good things in some long form interview. But once they get back to politics, you wonder what happened to the apparently principled and liberty loving person from the interview.
They remember they’re a politician and they want to hold on to what power they’ve got?
You don't have potholes because you live south of the freeze-thaw cycle. Bad roads are first correlated to the climate conditions that eat roads. The ability of government to keep up with road repairs is a distant second factor that's not even identifiable until you control for the differential damage they suffer.
Very true. It’s just gotten really cold over the last three weeks where I live. Potholes really showing themselves now.
South Dakota has great roads without a state income tax. We pay for it when the bikers come through in August and pay sales taxes.
I dunno. Germany has among the best roads in the world. Plenty of freeze-thaw as well.
It is the lousy quality of American road construction. In PA they have to re-surface I-80 every other year; that was by design to keep the union thugs employed. Repeat across the freeze zone.
He was a weenie then, he's a weenie now. He missed every chance to tear into DeFascist and his toadies, and he waffled, ducked and weaved his way out of everything. No, the anti-woman anti-gay anti-minority anti-freedom trend in Florida is NOT "the same as the left".
Are you sure you know what a Fascist is? It's not just a word to wrap everyone you disagree with up and toss aside.
It’s too stupid to understand that.
You were an ignorant asshole then, you're an ignorant asshole now.
Fuck off and die.
Florida benefits from those pension benefits its retiree residents have earned elsewhere. Florida is also one of the states suing FEMA to prevent the heavily-subsidized National Flood Insurance Program from charging rates more reflective of the risks it covers. In other ways, Florida benefits from its unque geography without bearing all the costs that go with it. I don't deny that Florida does some things right, but it is not and cannot be a model for other states.
End the National Flood Insurance Program. It is a massive welfare program for people who are so stupid that they want to build in flood zones. There are thousands of insurance companies in the US and if zero find you an acceptable risk, maybe you should move your home and business elsewhere.
Yes. Homeowners insurance rates in Florida are climbing fast due to the hurricane damage. The benefits of coastal ownership accrue to the few but the costs accrue to the many. End the NFIP.
DeSantis and the Florida GOP controlled-legislature haven't done shit about the insurance crisis here. Too busy banning drag shows and fucking with Disney.
This is the steaming pile of lefty shit who proposes murder iof the unarmed as a preventative measure if there's a chance they might later do something asshole doesn't like:
JasonT20
February.6.2022 at 6:02 pm
“How many officers were there to stop Ashlee Babbitt and the dozens of people behind her from getting into the legislative chamber to do who knows what?...”
The mobs moving down will do to Florida what the mobs moving into California did.
It will eventually turn into a high tax, highly regulated state.
Florida has quite a few things going for it. As a Floridian, the two that stick out to me are:
1. No income tax.
2. Property Tax laws that prevent property taxes from going up 10-20% a year just because property values do.
That being said, the amount of money being spent at the State, County, and Local levels combined is still rediculous and needs to be addressed.
In addition, the corrections system needs work. Florida's legislature has no problem constantly passing laws, most based on feelings instead of facts, for putting people in prison but never address how to pay of it or reintegration back into society. Florida hasn't had a parole system for almost 40 years and all inmates, including first timers, must serve at least 85% of their sentence.
And these are patriotic people. They believe in freedom. They've left oppressive regimes.
That's important to note. In a lot of immigrant-heavy blue states (and nations), you don't get as much of that. Or, worse, they're cool with the oppression (see: Islam). Hence, the immigrants make no effort whatsoever to assimilate.
It's also why you see a lot of resentment about blue-staters fleeing to red-states. Like illegals, too many come for the perks but then actively work against what makes it so successful.
But when you get a lot of immigrants that fled dictatorships, it's different. And that's because Cubans, notably, since we're talking about Florida, remember what it was like to live under Castro. And they remember what allowed Castro to gain power and misuse it. Same goes for Mugabe, or Al-Bashir, or Duterte, or Maduro, etc. That's still VERY fresh in the minds of those who fled from those regimes, which gives them a very fresh respect for America and all her freedom and opportunity.
In many ways, they're far better Americans than most being produced by the American "education" system. And they're clearly a part of what's helping Florida thrive.
Did you know under Castro they didn't celebrate Christmass?
That made Castro a rebel without a Claus.
And Trump wants to deport these folks as vermin.
They only become vermin when their very first act is to infiltrate America rather than immigrate to her.
What’s the difference between infiltrating America and immigrating to it?
Referring to any human beings as “vermin” is about as dehumanizing as you can get.
vermin /vûr′mĭn/ noun plural
1. Various small animals, such as rats or cockroaches, that are destructive, annoying, or injurious to health.
2. Animals that prey on farm animals or game or that destroy crops.
3. People considered loathsome or repulsive.
Dehumanizing a hated enemy or out group is a standard propaganda tactic, especially in authoritarian movements. You need to give a government more authority to deal with “vermin” decisively, correct?
Jason is a scum-bag lefty shit who proposes murder of the unarmed as a preventative measure if there’s a chance they might later do something asshole doesn’t like:
JasonT20
February.6.2022 at 6:02 pm
“How many officers were there to stop Ashlee Babbitt and the dozens of people behind her from getting into the legislative chamber to do who knows what?…”
I wonder if you’ve ever watched the video. The pathetic thing was that several people, including Babbitt were there trying to break in. You can hear one of them shouting to officers on their side of the doorway about how many people were behind them trying to get in and that they didn’t want to hurt those officers. Then they starting telling people behind them to “make a path” for those few officers to get out of the way, which they did. Then someone with a flag starts using the pole to start bashing the windows. (Probably again, as the windows were already cracked.) One person starts shouting about the officer on the other side having his gun out, but apparently others didn’t hear this, didn’t think he’d shoot, or didn’t care. That officer with the gun looks to have been by himself near the door, with perhaps 3-4 others further down the hall hovering near other doorways. There was a makeshift barricade of chairs and other furniture on his side. Ashlee Babbitt wasn’t on camera when the shot was fired, but from the angle that the officer had with his weapon when he fired, she was likely going through a broken door over the barricade.
So that is what you have. A crowd of people telling officers that they didn’t want to hurt them, so they should just get out of the way and let them bash their way through a door to the Speaker’s lobby (which leads to the House floor – there may still have been congressmen and staff in there at the time).
I still don’t know what Sevo thinks officers should have done differently. Let all those people through? They clearly didn’t have the numbers or riot equipment to wrestle with them in an attempt to detain them with less force.
My suggestion to Sevo then is this. If he is behind the door to his home when a crowd of people is banging on it with clear intention to bash it down to get in, he should just let them go by into the rest of his house with his family. After all, shooting the first person to come through the door would clearly be murder, according to him.
I’m going to save this so that I can post it every time Sevo copies this thing he posts every time he sees me post about anything at all. That way, we can both have our stock answers to each other that have nothing to do with the content of the article we are commenting on.
Fuck off and die asswipe. You made the claim; you own it.
Yes, I did. And you have no answer to it other than your stock reply that lies about what what I am claiming even though you are also quoting me directly. I try and get you to think even slightly more about it, and you still can't deal with the truth. You just love stewing in your righteous anger and the power you imagine telling people to fuck off and die on the internet gives you.
JasonT20
November.26 at 4:33AM
“So that is what you have. A crowd of people telling officers that they didn’t want to hurt them, so they should just get out of the way and let them bash their way through a door to the Speaker’s lobby (which leads to the House floor – there may still have been congressmen and staff in there at the time)
[…]
I’m going to save this so that I can post it every time Sevo copies this thing he posts every time he sees me post about anything at all. That way, we can both have our stock answers to each other that have nothing to do with the content of the article we are commenting on."
I’m going to save this to prove that my earlier comment is exactly correct and the best you’ve got is not admission that you ARE a slime pile of lefty shit, but an attempt to justify BEING a slimy pile of lefty shit.
Please do. Continue to save and repeat your lies and misrepresentation of what I am saying, all while completely ignoring the reality of the situation.
It's not dehumanizing. It's insulting. There's a difference.
Look at your own definition. All three versions applies to illegals perfectly.
Dehumanizing them is to intentionally deny their humanity for the purpose of consciously depriving them of human rights. Pro-abortion folks dehumanize the in utero. Hamas dehumanizes the Jews (and the West). China dehumanizes pretty much anyone that's not China.
The only reason you object to "vermin" is because you know it's associated with unwanted creatures who are making their way into your home against your will and best efforts to prevent it. If I said someone was a bear of a man, or a foxy chick, or had the heart of a lion - you'd rightfully regard them all as compliments, despite the fact that it's metaphorically comparing them to lesser animals.
And they're not hated enemies. They're deeply resented for abusing our kindness and generosity.
America has no objection to immigration. But use the front door, instead of crawling in through a window you smashed. Is that really so wrong a position to take in your book?
Seek treatment for your TDS, twit.
That is why Poles, Czechs, Hungarians, etc also make for good citizens in America. At least those who were around before 1989.
Meth
In Chicago or Washington, D.C., or New York, they spend $25,000 per student. How much of that is basically to pay for the sins of the past? Pension obligations that were negotiated, health care benefits for retirees. How much of that is actually going to the classroom? Compare that to Florida, where people in the past didn't do that.
Jeb! is supposed to be smarter than his older brother. So he knows that pensions and health care benefits for retirees are deferred compensation for those people that had worked in the school systems. People earn their retirement by working, thus deferred compensation like that for teachers is money that was spent in the classroom.
It is absolutely fair to say that some states and districts obligated themselves to unsustainable retirement benefits, and that the unions that negotiated for those benefits while contributing to legislator's campaigns share the blame. Governments got away with that at the time by manipulating the actuarial analysis and projections of pension fund growth to make contributions lower while those people were working. Thus they didn't have to have taxes as high as they would have needed to be to keep the pension funds healthy.
Jeb is right that Florida didn't do that. The Florida Retirement System was relatively healthy in comparison to most state pension funds when he was governor. Although, its funded ratio has decreased over the last 15 years. It was over 100% funded when the Great Recession hit in 2008. Rick Scott and Ron DeSantis haven't done anything to make it recover, with it actually going down some since 2011 when Scott took office. (See this pdf from Reason Foundation for analysis of the FRS problems.)
This shows that it isn't just whether employees are earning "too much" in pensions, but how the funds are managed that matters. And Florida GOP governors have not helped improve the FRS. The criticism from the right is always that the pension fund assumptions are manipulated to give benefits that are more generous than the taxes being collected can justify. Here we see the other side of the coin. Assumptions that are too rosy in order to keep government contributions down so that they can have lower taxes, without giving employees anything extra. (In fact, the pension benefits are lower than they were in Jeb's time, since they did away with COLA adjustments in 2011 for new hires.)
Jason is a lefty shit pile who proposes murder of the unarmed as a preventative measure if there’s a chance they might later do something asshole doesn’t like:
JasonT20
February.6.2022 at 6:02 pm
“How many officers were there to stop Ashlee Babbitt and the dozens of people behind her from getting into the legislative chamber to do who knows what?…”
I wonder if you’ve ever watched the video. The pathetic thing was that several people, including Babbitt were there trying to break in. You can hear one of them shouting to officers on their side of the doorway about how many people were behind them trying to get in and that they didn’t want to hurt those officers. Then they starting telling people behind them to “make a path” for those few officers to get out of the way, which they did. Then someone with a flag starts using the pole to start bashing the windows. (Probably again, as the windows were already cracked.) One person starts shouting about the officer on the other side having his gun out, but apparently others didn’t hear this, didn’t think he’d shoot, or didn’t care. That officer with the gun looks to have been by himself near the door, with perhaps 3-4 others further down the hall hovering near other doorways. There was a makeshift barricade of chairs and other furniture on his side. Ashlee Babbitt wasn’t on camera when the shot was fired, but from the angle that the officer had with his weapon when he fired, she was likely going through a broken door over the barricade.
So that is what you have. A crowd of people telling officers that they didn’t want to hurt them, so they should just get out of the way and let them bash their way through a door to the Speaker’s lobby (which leads to the House floor – there may still have been congressmen and staff in there at the time).
I still don’t know what Sevo thinks officers should have done differently. Let all those people through? They clearly didn’t have the numbers or riot equipment to wrestle with them in an attempt to detain them with less force.
My suggestion to Sevo then is this. If he is behind the door to his home when a crowd of people is banging on it with clear intention to bash it down to get in, he should just let them go by into the rest of his house with his family. After all, shooting the first person to come through the door would clearly be murder, according to him.
I’m going to save this so that I can post it every time Sevo copies this thing he posts every time he sees me post about anything at all. That way, we can both have our stock answers to each other that have nothing to do with the content of the article we are commenting on.
This is the steaming pile of lefty shit who supports murder of the unarmed as a preventative measure, since they might, sometime later do something the asshole doesn't like:
JasonT20
February.6.2022 at 6:02 pm
“How many officers were there to stop Ashlee Babbitt and the dozens of people behind her from getting into the legislative chamber to do who knows what?...”
Don't let the asswipe forget it.
Oh, and note to asswipe:
fuck off and die; Make your family proud and the world a better place.
Yep. No answer to facts and reasoning. Speaking of the unarmed, I guess that is why it was unfair of me to enter into a battle of wits with Sevo.
Yes, I get all my best advice and deepest insights from Jeb. And now, I have this bridge I'd like to sell you. The pink unicorns are looking to move it fast.
A 6-week abortion ban is micromanaging at the highest level. Tick tock, GOP.....