He Wants To Label Food 'Low FODMAP.' The Government Won't Let Him.
Lots of Americans have an intolerance to FODMAPs—the sugars prevalent in garlic, onion, and many other foods.

My first Stossel TV Fellow, Trevor Kraus, initiated this column.
Our video version is called "Freshly Cooked Censorship: Why You Can't Put 'Low FODMAP' on Food Labels."
Kraus reports that rigid government rules prevent food producers from informing you about useful foods, like low-FODMAP foods.
FODMAP is an acronym for sugars prevalent in garlic, onion, apples, honey, and many other foods. Lots of Americans have an intolerance to FODMAPs. For a few, it can be deadly.
Ketan Vakil, who's FODMAP intolerant himself, started a company that sells low-FODMAP foods like bone broths, garlic chive salt, and green onion powder—all with fewer of the ingredients that can cause stomach problems.
"I decided to replace those ingredients with other things that taste great, but don't cause stomach symptoms," says Vakil. "We use the tops of scallions, just the green parts. They taste like onion. Not the exact flavor, but really similar. That part of the plant is lower in FODMAPs."
Sounds great.
But stupidly, the government won't let him say "low-FODMAP" on his labels.
It's not because Vakil is lying about ingredients or their usefulness. He's right in saying his labels have "scientific backing that the medical community accepts."
Doctors acknowledge that FODMAPs are a problem for some people, causing cramping, diarrhea, stomach bloating, etc. Choosing low-FODMAP products would help many.
But the government still won't allow Vakil to put "Low-FODMAP" on the label.
"We had to remove the Low-FODMAP certified symbol, 'gut-friendly,' all the words that would help a shopper find that product for themselves," says Vakil.
The government didn't actually "ban" those words. They just don't allow them because they're not already on the government's approved list.
So Justin Pearson, senior attorney at public interest law firm the Institute for Justice, is helping Vakil sue the government.
"Everyone agrees that Ketan is telling the truth," Pearson points out. "The government just bans it because it's not on the outdated, pre-approved list."
Some of the approved terms don't seem very scientific, or even specific. Ambiguous labels like "home style" and "deli fresh" are approved. But "Low-FODMAP," a more useful term, isn't allowed.
The "approved" list isn't even easy to find. It's scattered throughout several government websites. It took Kraus hours just to compile a partial list of what's approved.
"How do you get on that list?" Kraus asks Pearson.
"With a giant pile of money," Pearson replies, sarcastically referring to the years of lawyering and lobbying that would be required to get the Agriculture Department or the Food and Drug Administration to agree to a wording change.
Does the government ever update its list?
"No," says Pearson. "Why would they? Federal agencies do not respond to the market. Only businesses do."
Of course, some businesses make meaningless and deceptive claims. "We have a job to make sure consumers have access to accurate and useful new information," says the director of the FDA's Center for Food Safety.
Fine. But in this case, the bureaucracy is banning useful new information!
"It's hard enough to get a product out the door," says Vakil. "Not being able to explain it accurately to my customers, who we started the company for, is very frustrating. Laws that have been on the books for years harm my customer."
Lots of people suffer from a digestive problem. They don't want to wait for vendors like Vakil to struggle through the government's lengthy approval process.
Pearson says, "The best-case scenario: They could do it in a couple years. If you believe that, I have a bridge to sell you."
Vakil doesn't want to wait to help people. "I don't want to solve it for them in eight years. I want to solve it for them tomorrow."
If Vakil and Pearson win their case, it would be a game-changer not just for people who have trouble digesting garlic and onion, but for millions more whose lives could be improved by future diets we don't even know about.
COPYRIGHT 2023 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Make “Lowfodmap” the name of your company, and splash it on the packaging.
Do you think a meat packing company named “EndGenderDysphoria” would get the green light?
I Am Earning $81,100 so Far this year working 0nline and I am a full time college student and just working for 3 to 4 hours a day I’ve made such great m0ney.I am Genuinely thankful to and my administrator, It’s’ really user friendly and I’m just so happY that I found out about this…
I Worked Here ==> http://Www.Smartcareer1.com
Would they only sell sausages and meatballs?
What is breast meat, chopped liver?
I can’t tell you that. What does it identify as?
That was my first thought as well
Great idea!
The creativity of Americans never ceases to amaze me. I keep seeing new products and ideas, and think “Why didn’t I think of that?”
Note the Institute for Justice, a group of libertarian leaning lawyers, does a lot for our freedoms. I give Reason, and Stossel, credit for reporting it. I thank all of you for that, this Thanksgiving.
Lots of Americans have an intolerance to FODMAPs. For a few, it can be deadly.
No John, they don’t and no, it’s not. You’re not fighting the libertarian cause here, you’ve been suckered by the lies and are just fighting on the side of the next social-justice “Animal fat causes obesity and heart disease” rent-seeker.
They’re not stopping him from naming his company or his product “Low-FODMAP”.
They’re not stopping him from writing “Low-FODMAP” on the label any more than they’re stopping anyone from writing “Vitalizes body and mind”, “Keto”, “Gluten-free”, High Protein, or “Less than 100 mg of Caffeine per 8.4 oz. container” on a can of Red Bull.
Like the “vaccines cause autism” research, the research behind gluten sensitivity and FODMAPs has since been retracted and otherwise reframed by its originator. The medical community agrees wheat is a problem the way they agreed animal fats, syndrome X, and sodium were a problem.
What they aren’t letting him do is advertise that his food contains or is free of made up bullshit and/or treats or averts some made up disease. You may not like it, but between all the anti-oxidant, superfood, microbiotic, gut biome, bullshit and actual, literal poison and snake oil a line, one way or another, has to be drawn. I’m absolutely with you that I wish the rules were fewer and more sane. Part and parcel to that is not falling for every made up bullshit pseudo-science fad that falls off the turnip truck.
In other words, you’re against government regulation until you’re for it.
Whether Stossel’s reason is valid or not, he’s on the libertarian side, and you are not.
Yeah, I’m also opposed to lying until I’m told the truth too. I can see how such a reversal might be hard for some people to understand.
This is the same fallacious game the other liberteen fashionistas love to play; that just because someone can be framed as being anti-government or even just anti-establishment, they are inherently correct or libertarian. Regardless of whether the framing is just unwittingly omitted half-truth or knowing and outright lie.
Stossel’s on the side of people who were pro-mask, pro-pseudo-science, rent-seekers yesterday, who will be pro-mask, pro-pseudo-science, rent-seekers tomorrow, and who just happen to be, today, opposed to the current set of rent-seekers.
I’ve heard this sort of bullshit before. It’s rampant in the supplement industry where the FDA is exceedingly liberal about letting people load up their labels with even more bullshit. Someone will cry “Foul” that the FDA cracked down on them. Even go so far as to point out that the FDA cracked down on them but not someone else. When, in reality, the FDA asked some rather relevant questions like “What exactly makes this food Low FODMAP?” and get answers back like “Because we use the tops of onions.” rather than assay results and clinical literature.
This is the same retarded bullshit where “libertarianism” winds up as bake the cake and side with Antifa protestors to (not) win elections because it’s popular.
mad.casual, your assertions are without references or reason. Wikipedia has articles on FODMAP, and it’s referenced in publications such as the NIH, Harvard, Oxford, John Hopkins and others. Many of the 11% of the population with IBS find FODMAPs to be a problem.
As to killing people, I’d bet eating an irritant on an ongoing basis will shorten your life. If you have food intolerances, I’d advise avoiding those foods. Further, I’m not aware that Stossel was for forced masking, and if he was, so what? We were all mis-informed by Fauci, the FDA, and the CDC. I personally don’t want assay results and clinical literature in this article, it’d be too long.
And did you mis-spell your handle, and meant mad-causal? Please show your readers some respect, so they don’t think you mis-spelled your handle.
Wow Wikipedia and the nih! How many of those sources also said 10% safe and effective for the wu flu jab?
Go fuck yourself. Respect, amnesty, is earned, not owed. The disingenuous bullshit of “doing something on an ongoing basis” = “kills” is why that’s as it should be. So people don’t mistakenly give respect to shitheel sealions like you. You aren’t “MoreFreedom” you’re “MoreControl”, you need people to be so stupid as to eat something that gives them the shits to death, obliviously and without agency, so that your pseudo-intellectual self-righteousness is justified.
*You* may’ve been misinformed by Fauci, NIH, Harvard, Oxford, John Hopkins and others… *we* were not and “so what?” is the reason you’re owed nothing less than syringe full of dysentery-contaminated feces at your next booster.
Your assertions about Low-FODOMAP people are not found in evidence and they are advocating coercing anyone to do anything. Rare as the condition may be, individuals have a right to preserve their health against it and food companies have a right to produce food that preserves their health and to accurately label it. Now go babble somewhere else.
“Everyone agrees that Ketan is telling the truth,”
Everyone? Yeah, go fuck yourself you eco-consensus shyster.
For a few, it can be deadly.
This is Reason (drink). GTFO with your “People will die!” bullshit.
Then the FDA could claim that the label is misleading. They didn’t.
You know that first hand or are you just inferring from what Valik’s lawyer said?
Because, again, this isn’t the first time I’ve seen this sort of stupid shit go down, even here at Reason. More than half the time it’s someone answering “Because I know how to cut the tops off an onion.” in response to the completely reasonable question by the FDA of “How do you *know* your product is a low-FODMAP food?” and they’re lawyer chiming in with “Well, *everyone* says it’s low-FODMAP!”
Who have Vakil and Pearson voted for in the past? Is this a new fondness for minimal government?
$100 at 10:1 odds that, whether you’ve actually looked it up or not, you already know the answer to that question.
If you would care to parlay the bet, I will double your money (and irony) that neither of them has voted for Dr. Oz.
Wonder if this is just for the sprayed, monoculture crap produce or actual vegetables. Onions are the second most awesome veggie trailing only the potato (potatoe if your last name is Quayle).
It’s bullshit literally created by the same guy at the same time as the gluten sensitivity bullshit that, again the same guy, showed was psychosomatic, or other, bullshit when he tried to reproduce it.
Peter Gibson (2011): “‘Non-celiac gluten intolerance’ may exist, but no clues to the mechanism were elucidated.”
Peter Gibson (2013): “In a placebo-controlled, cross-over rechallenge study, we found no evidence of specific or dose-dependent effects of gluten in patients with NCGS placed diets low in FODMAPs.”
Later studies confirmed his 2013 conclusions.
This article is Stoss, perpetuating the dietary equivalent of the “Vaccines cause autism.” (long COVID, chronic Lyme disease… take your pick) argument in 2023 and feeding into people’s victim/persecution and Munchausen by proxy complexes.
Dude, Peter Gibson is the good guy here. He didn’t create the bullshit around gluten-free products. Those who misread and ran wild with his study did. Gibson went where the evidence led, did try to cash in on gluten-free hype, and blogger Aaron Carroll praised Gibson for that.
Jebus, have some Sanka!
Correction: Did not try to cash in…
FODMAP stands for Fermentable Oligosaccharides, Disaccharides, Monosaccharides And Polyols. That definition doesn’t help much, though. They are particular categories complex carbohydrates that are “resistant” to human digestion. Which means that your gut bacteria do more of the work which means you have more gas. Most of us solve that by farting. But if you try to hold it in (or can’t release the gas), yeah, that can cause real problems.
Examples of FODMAPs include fructose (found in almost all fruits and many vegetables), lactose (milk), fructans (wheat, and other grains), galactans (beans and legumes) and sugar alcohols like xylitol, sorbitol, maltitol and mannitol (some foods and lots of artificial sweeteners).
So, yeah, these occur in “actual vegetables”.
I had to look it up, and it ended up a fascinating tour through political correctness and pseudo- science posing as science. Did you know an avocado is high FODMAP but an eighth of an avocado is low FODMAP. Just cut your avocado into eight pieces before you mash it onto your toast and you’ll be OK.
Bye now – I feel the need for a FODMAP boost.
That definition doesn’t help much, though.
Your other definition doesn’t help much though as *any* carbohydrate is both fermentable and an oligo-, di-, monosaccharide, or polyol. The definition, and any downstream disease, is tautological. Again, this has been demonstrated by the studies I linked to as well as other investigations and common sense. For instance, fructose (which is *not* a complex carbohydrate) is frequently listed as a FODMAP, but it’s one of three sugars absorbed *directly* through the gut into the portal vein. If you wanted to supply your body with sugar without an IV and without requiring any digestion in the gut, fructose is one of three sugars you would use. Everyone absorbs different amounts of fructose at different rates and there are people with genetically-predisposed lesser abilities to absorb fructose but lumping that in with FODMAPs is like saying you have a meat digestion disorder because you’re allergic to shellfish.
This would be obvious to anyone who’s worked in biochemistry and studies of animal digestion but, if you were a wide-eyed researcher looking for funding, the search for things that give people the tummy rumbles is a mine of infinite depth and, as long as their particular tummy rumbles aren’t actually stunting their growth or directly killing them, easily and abundantly mined.
I’d say of you’re allergic to all that you should know what those things are and look for them on the FDA required labels.
We have a freond who is really allergic to citrus. If we have a candle with a citrus oil in the wax she starts coughing. We have to double check all sorts of stuff if she’s coming over to eat. It’s a pain, but you’d be surprised what else you see on that label when you look. I’ve changed my shopping habits because of one friend’s allergy.
Not to say the guy shouldn’t be allowed to put whatever he wants on his products but I don’t think it’s as big a deal as Stosel is making it out to be. Print the ingredients label in larger font and put it on the front. That should work well enough.
The symptoms and reactions described by FODMAP advocates could be many things but they are not allergies. Completely different biological pathway.
Sugar alcohols make me fart and shit violently with significant pain. The small amount of mannitol found naturally in things like kelp usually isn’t a problem, because I would never eat enough. When they use it as an artificial sweetener it is deadly.
At that point if you think you can’t eat any of that do you take the hint that nature wants you dead?
Onions trail potatoes (but only in awesomeness).
Potatoes are there to deliver yummy fats to my mouth. Like sour cream, butter and cheese.
I thought they were a salt delivery system, like french fries.
Man, is there anything the potato can’t do?
They could also serve a vehicle for meat in the form of chili when you hollow the potatoes out. A versatile thing, the pomme de terre! (French word for “Potato,” literally translated as “Apple of the Earth.”)
John’s essays increasingly need Author Allergic to Brainfood warning labels
Ketan Vakil? Is he a vampire? Garlic can be deadly to a vampire.
Stakeholders interested in an answer to this.
They will be kept in the dark.
Tell ’em, or they might get cross.
If you can’t eat garlic then maybe the Van Helsing Institute needs your address…..
He probably can’t tell you, having no capacity for self-reflection.
🙂
😉
Lots of Americans have an intolerance to FODMAPs. For a few, it can be deadly.
I seriously can’t with these dumb new fad diets that pop up every couple years. So, I’m just going to let Chris Rock explain it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eybZtDx6tAU
I guess the FDA is too busy being a dictator and mining BS propaganda about COVID, drugs and smoking to define a standard for the FODMAP label.
Maybe…. Just maybe… A private standards organization (hut hum: ISO) that relies (held accountable) by paid-value significance would do a much better job than an entity funded by armed-theft. Then if those private standards organization violated the people’s trust the halls of justice would correct them.
This is the massive problem with asking the “halls of justice” to be a supplier sits. Merging the two literally VOIDS the people’s “halls of justice”. It’s just like pretending Walmart is the new Government so when Walmart steals from you where do you go for Justice? Walmart?
That over a million Americans died from COVID is not propaganda it is fact. Hundreds of thousands die every year from smoking — that is a fact.
But when you are in the hospital dying from respiratory disease you have Medicare pay for your hospital stay.
A private standards organization would simply give Unregulated Big Pharma and Unregulated Big Insurance total control over your healthcare. That might not be such a bad idea. Unregulated Big Insurance would order hospitals not to bother trying to treat the blithering idiots who refuse to get vaccinated. It would lower healthcare cosas and clean up the gene pool!
Here’s a fun fact. 100% (3.46million/year) people die. Covid didn’t even out-due deaths from heart disease or cancer or even the common-cold in the 1900s (per the CDC) – while smoking rates went from 70% to 10% Covid still couldn’t out-due cancer. The alarmist is the BS.
And OMG!!! People wouldn’t live for eternity and they’d have to actually pay their own bills to have control over their healthcare???? The horror!!! /s
I think it’s funny you think government is some sort of monopoly god in comparison to pharma and insurance since its only government using ‘guns’ to do business.
…ironically the same ‘gun’ packing monopoly that created COVID.
Ultimately, the issue with FODMAPs is that it’s the same anti-human, (anti-)progressive, anti-science, GND/ESG messaging in a different package. It starts from the animism that producing more than enough calories for everyone using Western agricultural practice *must* inherently be bad and attempts to tie completely irrelevant disease and conditions to the presumption.
As I indicate above, there is no carbohydrate or even glyco-protein that doesn’t fit under the definition of FODMAP. There are diets, such as Keto or carnivore diets that completely avoid carbohydrates, but many FODMAP advocates cannot abide this. They cannot abide this very much akin to the manner that anti-CO2 activists cannot abide nuclear power. They’ve spent too much time demonizing the kinds of people who would eat meat and use nuclear to recognize that as the obvious solution to the bundle of sticks they’ve cobbled together into a problem.
So, they have to pretend that the real reason 11% of people get occasional intestinal problems is from eating a Western-style diet is because of the carbohydrates and that nobody outside the US ever gets the tummy rumbles and, even if they did, only wind-power and onion tops can solve it.
Too bad. A FODMAP would be really useful in policing the flight line.