How The Simpsons Strangled Itself Into Irrelevance
The once-subversive show now traffics in the clichés it used to mock so effectively.

To paraphrase Marx, sitcoms repeat themselves, first as satire and then as farce. Or maybe just as self-parody.
That's the case with The Simpsons, America's longest-running scripted TV series, longest-running animated show, and longest-running sitcom. Once an engagingly genial yet subversive part of American popular culture whose creator, Matt Groening, sharpened his talents in alternative comix, The Simpsons soldiers on in its 35th season as a pale, tired imitation of its earlier self, one that no longer delights as much as it disappoints. It is almost certainly asking too much for The Simpsons or any other creative offering to keep a sharp edge for this long, but the show's latest controversy provides an object lesson in how pedantic and tedious American culture can become.
In a recent episode, goofball patriarch Homer announces that he will no longer enact one of the show's longest-running gags, which involved strangling his son Bart whenever the kid pisses him off (which is often). When meeting a new neighbor who remarks on his strong handshake, Homer says to his wife, "See, Marge, strangling the boy has paid off….Just kidding. I don't do that anymore….Times have changed!" As the pop-culture site IGN notes, Homer hasn't in fact strangled Bart onscreen since the 2019–2020 season. (Go here for a supercut video that promises "Homer STRANGLING Bart For 10 Minutes Straight!")

Yes, times have changed. The minute I read about the new episode, I thought back to a particularly memorable installment from the show's second season. In "Itchy & Scratchy & Marge," Marge leads a successful campaign to clean up TV after realizing how ultra-violent her kids' favorite cartoon, Itchy & Scratchy, really is. (In a typical episode, "Field of Screams," Itchy the mouse runs over Scratchy the cat with a thresher and then uses the decapitated head to play catch with his son, parodying a scene in the syrupy baseball movie Field of Dreams.)
The inciting incident for Marge comes when baby Maggie imitates what she sees on the small screen and whacks Homer on the head with a mallet. Marge's protest succeeds spectacularly, and she gets the makers of Itchy & Scratchy, whose theme song promises "They fight! And bite! They fight and bite and fight! Fight, fight, fight! Bite, bite, bite!" to create wholesome episodes like the one below, titled "Porch Pals":
The new and improved Itchy & Scratchy is so nauseatingly sweet and good-for-you that Springfield's kids turn off their TVs and go outside to play and start to thrive like never before, a wry commentary on persistent fears that fantasy violence—and fantasy sex—on the boob tube deformed children's moral lives.
In its earlier days, The Simpsons wasn't simply funny. Along with a number of other shows, such as Beavis and Butt-head and Mystery Science Theater 3000, it helped to teach us all how to consume pop culture critically by commenting directly and indirectly on the recurring conceits and tropes of TV and the critical discussion about the medium.
This was no small matter. The country was in the midst of an explosion of cultural offerings that freaked out tastemakers and gatekeepers. As the double whammy of cable TV and the internet rolled out across the nation, powerful people were convinced that most of us, but especially children, were incapable of distinguishing between basic cable and basic reality. What we needed more than ever was a guardian class that would regulate and restrict the music we listened to, the TV and movies watched, and the websites we searched. As the University of Tulsa's Joli Jensen told Reason, the guardian-class attitude proceeds from "an assumption that art is an instrument like medicine or a toxin that can be injected into us and transform us." If you believe that, you are going to do whatever you can to make sure only the "right" sort of messages are being sent. "Just like TV sets or radios," I summarized the view in 1996, "we are dumb receivers that simply transmit whatever is broadcast to us. We do not look at movie screens; we are movie screens, and Hollywood merely projects morality—good, bad, or indifferent—onto us."
That sort of thinking has a long and storied lineage, and it has been applied in various ways to novels, movies, comic books, rock and roll, and other forms of mass entertainment. The idea regularly migrates to new forms of popular culture (video games, social media, smart phones) and usually gets dressed up in scientific-sounding language.
It's hard to recapture the moral and social panic caused by the appearance of The Simpsons and the Fox network on which it appeared. Fox became the fourth over-the-air broadcast network in late 1986 and was known for its edgy content and gross-out humor. Conservatives and liberals alike attacked The Simpsons and the network's other shows, such as Married…with Children, as portents of the end of all that was good and decent in American society. Bluenoses raged at the sight of Bart wearing a t-shirt with "Underachiever" emblazoned on it, with some school districts actually banning the gear. Republican Bill Bennett and Democrat Joe Lieberman, two thankfully mostly forgotten but once powerful political figures, joined forces to denounce such anti-social offerings by handing out "Silver Sewer Awards" that trashed Fox TV and Rupert Murdoch for vulgarizing the airwaves. They were joined by such figures as Sen. Bob Dole (R–Kansas), Attorney General Janet Reno, and first lady Hillary Clinton, who were convinced that "fantasy violence" and promiscuous sex scenes on TV caused those same problems in the real world. Reno explicitly threatened TV networks with censorship, averring that "the regulation of violence is constitutionally permissible" while senators pushed legislation that would have made cable networks subject to FCC content regulations. Pundits predicted an endless rise in mayhem if shows like The Simpsons—which had a famous gag where a character kept shouting "Will someone please think of the children?"—weren't reined in.
Such fears mostly dispersed in the absence of plausible research showing much of a correlation, much less anything hinting at causation, between watching sex and violence on TV and then perpetrating it in the real world. The long and virtually uninterrupted decline in crime that began in the mid-1990s—right as increasingly violent and sexually explicit TV, internet content, and video games were becoming ubiquitous—also helped to minimize calls for more G-rated content and tighter restrictions on who could consume what. Which of course isn't to say they went away: In 2005, for instance, Hillary Clinton, by then a senator from New York, declared that the video game Grand Theft Auto "encourages [children] to have sex with prostitutes and then murder them" while calling for an federal investigation of how games were rated and sold.
Over the past decade or so, calls for kinder, gentler content seem driven less by worries that, say, depictions of violence will cause problems in the real world and more about the pain and suffering that bad representations of particular types of characters might cause among some viewers. Indeed, the last time The Simpsons was widely discussed was in 2017, when comedian Hari Kondabolu* called out the show for its supposedly one-dimensional representation of South Asians in the documentary The Problem with Apu. As a result, the actor who voiced Kwik-E-Mart owner Apu, Hank Azaria, stopped doing the character. A few years later, during riots and protests in the wake of the police killing of George Floyd, the producers of The Simpsons announced that it would "no longer have white actors voice non-white characters."
However well-intentioned such gestures might be, it's clear that they have done nothing to bring viewers back to The Simpsons. In its first few seasons, it averaged well over 20 million viewers per episode. Its most recent complete season drew less than a tenth of that.
"Itchy & Scratchy & Marge" ends with Marge renouncing paternalistic censorship after a movement inspired by her own activism launches a campaign to put pants on Michelangelo's David. Thirty-three years later, the show that once challenged the censorial zeitgeist now seems all too much a part of it.
CORRECTION: This article originally misidentified the writer and star of The Problem with Apu as Akaash Singh, whose 2022 comedy special Bring Back Apu argues that The Simpsons character "is not racist, he's the American Dream."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
lost the edge with Bush Derangement Syndrome in I think the 2004/5 season but I've still never missed an episode.
>>by commenting directly and indirectly on the recurring conceits and tropes of TV and the critical discussion about the medium.
this is true. Simpsons is Americana in cartoon form.
There were still some moments after the Bush years when it was funny. Not always good, but a decade ago you could see them trying stuff, having an occasional laugh though it was mostly pablum.
Trump broke them, like everyone else in Hollywood. Pure woke tripe after that. Went from being a turd in a toilet bowl to the giant pile of shit in the bottom of the privvy at a week long festival. It became actively preachy and just bad. Woke Simpsons is definitely the worst Simpsons.
Simpsons writers were always shitlibs, now they're just middle aged shitlibs
The show has been on for 34 years. There have been several generations of production teams. We’re almost to the grandchildren of the original showrunners.
Don’t even get me started on Doctor Who, which has its 60th anniversary this Thanksgiving.
Unlike the Simpson’s, Dr. Who had an interval in the middle when it was off the air.
Then they came back with better special effects and an attempt to appeal to the female demographic. Very interesting, but they should all get off my lawn.
>>There were still some moments after the Bush years when it was funny.
absolutely. several moments from the last decade fer sure like I said I never miss an episode. but I can quote 1992 --> 2005
Exactly. Then it wasn't "sometimes funny" it was actually culturally relevant.
Alas, now it's anti-funny. I mean, the last one I saw a few years ago was embarrassingly bad. The few I saw just before that ranged from bad to just plain stupid tripe. Those people are just going through the motions, collecting a paycheck to fund their ever more lavish retirements.
Im making over $13k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. This is what I do.
This Website➤---------------➤ https://www.dailypro7.com
That goes double for the American Anthropological Association
I gave up probably around 2001 or so. I was sure at that point that they had at most 1 or 2 more seasons left.
I quit when Phil Hartman died.
So, not recently.
Didn't feel like I was missing much.
You didn’t miss anything.
After South Park started - I never watched The Simpsons again.
Another 20 year old late hot take?
Nick really is the 90's personified.
Not at all.
The 90s were cool and mostly fun, at least judging by the movies.
Nick just sucks balls.
The Simpsons hasn't been relevant for over 20 years.
And isn't coming back even if they fix it, like coal mining.
My kids watch it and have probably seen every episode, but they binge watch it Netflix-style and would never sit down for just a 30 min. episode and between all the other shows then and since, probably never will watch it even half as much as I have.
Doh!
Iirc, they fired all the snarky libertarian writers around season 7 and turned into SNL post Norm MacDonald.
I was just gonna say I gave up about season 7 -- makes sense.
i gave up around seasons 9, 10
"its supposedly one-dimensional representation of South Asians"
The thing is, Nick, Apu was a one-dimensional character: he talked funny. That was it. That was his act. It's "interesting" that Asians were often ridiculed in supposedly hip shows like Seinfeld and 30 Rock as effeminate, money-grubbing, cunning, etc., who took advantage of us trusting, easy-going white folk.
Nonsense. Apu may have started out that way, but he became a well developed character who was one of the more decent and humane characters on the show.
I think maybe the jokes about Apu making an honest living off of Homer’s sloven stupidity hit a little too close to home for Alan.
Originally, Apu didn’t talk funny, certainly not the way Ned Flanders or Comic Book Guy or the Sea Captain or Dr. Nick or Ranier Wolfcastle or Cletus etc., etc., etc. all talked funny straight from their introductions, and his "act" was literally as a convenience store clerk. A job that he prided himself on and that others routinely regarded him as stalwart and trustworthy in even, at worst, nowhere near as underhanded, money-grubbing, or conniving as Moe, Krusty, Mr. Burns, etc., etc.,etc.
Wait'll the "differently-abled" go after the aspy comic book guy.
He owned the store.
Nobody who actually watches the Simpson's would say this.
Apu is one of, if not the, most fleshed out characters on the show.
People who only regurgitate Twitter takes think otherwise.
And possibly the most upstanding citizen of Springfield.
Is India considered 'Asian', and if so why?
Britain.
Not joking, in Britain, Indians and Pakistanis are "Asian".
Pakistani's are black in Britain.
Can't tell if serious. There are people who don't regard India or India Indians as Asian??!
I don't consider India as Far East, but plenty of people do, and I can't say they're wrong.
In America "Asian" has been "East Asian" first for at least my whole life. At least where I grew up. Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, even Filipino around here were always what came to mind as Asian. Southern California got big influxes of Filipinos and Vietnamese after WWII and Vietnam, and always had a large Chinese population.
South Asians we just called Indians. You know, pretty much anyone from India or India adjacent (Bangladesh/Myanmar/Pakistan/Sri Lanka etc). We pretty much ignored all the "stan" SSRs being Asian, they were just russkies. Never even thought about places like Nepal, Tibet, etc except when listening to Bob Seger.
Brits say "Asian" and mean South Asian. Rougher communities just call them Pakis as a slur. But they had a large empire in South Asia and lots of their descendants live in the UK.
This is precisely what I think of when I think "Asian".
I was serious since notably 'Indian' is a discreet demographic completely separate from 'Asian' in the United States. I realize they are adjacent to the various 'Asian Nations' but it's rather like referring to someone from Brazil as an 'American'. Technically true, perhaps, but also somewhat misleading.
They're on the Asian continent.
Which one is that?
They're on the Indian subcontinent.
Have you ever watched any of those shows? What an idiotic take
Apu was one of the best and smartest characters -- gosh you SUCK.
Really the most beloved character on the show. I quit watching after the Hank Azaria bullshit.
Why do so many people decry the idea that we absorb and act upon the sex and violence in a show but have no qualms believing that we absorb other cultural aspects like if there are multi-cultural characters or such or vice-versa? I at least have more respect for someone if they want to regulate both the number of whites and the amount of sex instead of just one or the other.
How about we don't regulate either?
I'd prefer that, I just have more respect for those who have consistent thought on the matter instead of those who only see their evil as needing regulation.
I blame Gen X writers for not teaching their successors a damn thing.
Simpsons was written by Boomers.
The reality is, Gen X dropped the ball and we're paying for that with Millennials and Gen Z.
Gen X had nothing to do with anything.
"Gen X had nothing to do with anything."
This needs to be on a t-shirt. It's funny because it's true.
I would wear that t-shirt.
Put me down for one too, or not, whatever.
Speaking of good shirts: https://onlyforthefans.com/products/less-1984-more-1776-shirt-limited-available-presale
onlyforthefans? Isn't that at bit too close to onlyfans?
ya. billboard this. or don't I don't really care.
Hey ... I raised libertarians!
So have I, or at least constituonalists, and small r republicans.
You don't think American is coarser, grosser, and more vulgar since the 1980s or especially since the 1960s? All these "ground breaking" things have no effect whatsoever?
I love The Simpsons (and South Park and porn on the internet) but to say we're the same before and after, just isn't true.
It boils down to what is the mirror, and what is the real thing.
Is television a mirror of society, or does society change because of television?
I guess it doesn't have to be binary, perhaps it's a case of 'both', but I tend to think society leads and television merely reflects.
If you look closely at societal changes you will see that a small portion of society changes and then uses TV and media to change the next generation. As my brother once stated, "Those who argued the slippery slope of Elvis' hips weren't wrong. The debate is whether or not the slide itself was wrong."
TV is a cognitive feedback loop for weak minds
https://twitter.com/DissidentSoaps/status/1723021711241556120?t=DZJ_nzlHJR9QziYsxkoXDQ&s=19
This kind of comedy used to be legal in America.
[Link]
I stopped watching years ago because I thought and still think the seam had been mined out and all they're producing is rubble.
But apparently Futurama will be returning - on Hulu, alas - so all is not lost. I don't think Jews objected to Zoidberg then and I doubt we will now. Though perhaps ChatGPT will protest the depiction of Bender as a malign stereotype, as though all AIs are interested in hookers and blow.
I'm not sure if I should be pleased or horrified... something's going on at Reason... their article track is starting to look like my youtube feed.
What's next, an interview with Brendan O'Neill?
As if they'd admit how far they'd fallen.
"Pain and suffering that bad representations of particular types of characters might cause"?????
The f???
Everyone is weak now.
Seasons 4ish to 7ish are nearly peerless in quality. I still think of shit almost daily from that era. But it noticeable began to deflate after 9 or so.
cant agree more
I don't think that's the verb you mean.
They were "counterculture" against "normies."
When leftists took control of the culture, they dropped to their knees and became an organ of the state.
Thus ... they were NEVER freethinkers or supporters of individual freedom.
South Park has always been the best in the social commentary space. The Simpsons broke ground but was quickly bested by South Park.
The jokes used to fly like bullets out of a machine gun in the early years of the Simpsons. Then it slowed way down as they started giving us time to understand the increasingly lame jokes and even went as far as explaining the lame jokes with verbal exposes.
The Simpsons is like Howard Stern. Bring either up and people ask "Is that still on?".
isn’t howard growing out his finger and toe nails and saving jars of his own urine post covid?
I know, I know... there is no post-covid for Howie
Just to show how outdated the show is, when it started, Matt Groening's biggest beef was with the nuclear power industry, so he wanted to portray it as evil as possible, run by the evil Mr. Burns, with the idiot Homer Simpson in charge of plant safety.
Now with nuclear being the only reliable and consistent carbon free source of energy, that message doesn't resonate the same way in 2023 as it did in the 1980s.
I think Gillespie remembers that episode a bit different that I do.
The children went out to play when popular tv no longer interested them. The scenes of them engaging in activities and interacting with other human beings are accompanied by a piece from Beethoven (Pastoral, I believe). Later on, when the violent I&S returns, the kids are addicted to tv again and the playgrounds and streets are portrayed as abandoned.
Marge gives up her crusade when her cohorts also want to make noise against the statue of naked David. She has no answers to her apparent contradiction and effectively says "I guess context matters". The episode made a more nuanced point than scolding busybody parents. It did not dismiss the notion of tv as a corrosive influence on children.
The show leaned left from the beginning, but in its prime, the Simpsons weren't afraid to laugh and criticize at its own side. Good examples of that are Jebediah Springfield (AKA Hans Sprungfeld) and Lisa going vegetarian episodes.
Truer words were never spoken... about Reason.
This. Bart Simpson has been in the fourth grade since I was.