Matthew Shepard's Murder Was Almost Certainly Not an Anti-Gay Hate Crime
President Biden commemorated the 25th anniversary of his tragic death by celebrating legislation passed in Shepard's name. But it was based on a major falsehood.

In the fall of 1998, a man named Matthew Shepard was savagely beaten, strung out on a fence like a scarecrow, and left to die as the Wyoming night temperatures plunged. Over the last two and a half decades, the killing has been called many things. But a BBC headline from 2018 perhaps captures best: It was "the murder that changed America."
A statement from President Joe Biden helps explain why. "Twenty-five years ago today, Matthew Shepard lost his life to a brutal act of hate and violence that shocked our nation and the world," he said this morning. "The week prior, Matthew had been viciously attacked in a horrific anti-gay hate crime and left to die – simply for being himself."
Shepard's murder was, without a doubt, an act of hate and violence. But the latter part of Biden's statement—that his murder was spurred by homophobic animus—is the most important. For years, it has been repeated in some of the largest media outlets. It has driven federal policy. It is the part that "changed America," despite all evidence pointing to the fact that it isn't true.
If Biden's statement is any indication, that claim has regardless had long-lasting consequences, including a federal hate crime law bearing Shepard's name that broadened those offenses and gave federal law enforcement more muscular authority to pursue such investigations. Over the years, his death has been invoked as proof that gay people have a great deal to fear in the U.S. "simply for being" themselves, per the president.
How the robust narrative took shape is complex. But it didn't take very long. A few initial elements possibly corroborating such a story were there: Shepard was, indeed, gay; Aaron McKinney—one of the murderers, along with Russell Henderson—used gay slurs in his confession; and McKinney's attorneys attempted to introduce the "gay panic defense," hoping to argue at trial that he had essentially descended into madness when Shepard put a hand on his leg. (The judge was not having it, and his team was prohibited from employing that.)
There were, however, many questions that continued to go unanswered after the initial shock wore off. "The act-of-hate story never quite added up," wrote Elizabeth Nolan Brown in the October 2021 issue of Reason. "Why did police insist that the perpetrators' primary motive was robbery? Why did the allegedly violently homophobic perpetrators supposedly pretend to be gay? And if hate crime protections were needed to stop horrific acts like this from happening, why did Wyoming have no trouble convicting the men of first-degree murder and sentencing them to life in prison?"
It wasn't until the prominent gay journalist Stephen Jimenez published his 2013 book, The Book of Matt: Hidden Truths About the Murder of Matthew Shepard, that those gaps started to narrow significantly. McKinney and Shepard reportedly were connected by the drug trade, with Shepard set to receive a $10,000 shipment of methamphetamine around the time he was killed. Also relevant is that McKinney was allegedly not traumatized by advances from Shepard, as the two had been sexually involved.
In other words, Shepard's murder was almost certainly fueled by disagreements over money and drugs rather than gay identity, something that Henderson confirmed in an interview from prison with the Associated Press in 2018.
But the myth has continued to persist, as they sometimes do when in service of what is seen as the greater good. "25 years after Matthew Shepard's death," the A.P. noted in a piece this morning, "LGBTQ+ activists say equal-rights progress is at risk." Contrast that with what Shepard's father, Dennis, reportedly told Wyoming's governor not long after the murder: "We should not use Matt to further an agenda," he said. "Don't rush into just passing all kinds of new hate crimes laws. Be very careful of any changes and be sure you're not taking away rights of others in the process to race to this."
Yet, we've done that and more. Shepard continues to live on in calls for government intervention and a buttressed police state, as well as culturally, when we tell younger generations of gay people that they could be next.
Shepard's murder was evil. It was evil because murder is evil. Unfortunately, though, that's not always enough.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Most people who looked past common narratives knew this 15 years ago.
Maybe in 15 years we will learn about Floyd's overdose.
Confirmation bias will always lead zealots to believe the narrative that favors their cause even in the preponderance of contrary evidence.
Making an extra $15,000 per month from home by performing simple internet copy and paste jobs. This basic at-home job paid me $18,000 each year. Everyone may now easily make extra money online.
Detail Here—->> http://Www.Easywork7.com
Ye dogs, that's your takeaway? While the motive may have been misrepresented, that doesn't change the fact that a murder occurred. And the fact that Floyd had drugs in his system doesn't change the fact that his death was a murder or manslaughter at the very least.
Lol. His lungs were 3 times the size they should have been based on the original autopsy report. A sign he drowned from fluids in his lungs from an overdose. The 2nd autopsy was done after politics began and on the stand the coroner stated he changed the report due to the video. Not due to medical information.
Yes. It matters when facts change due to politics. But you're one of the people they are attempting to lie to.
He had multiple drugs in his system. He began complaining about not breathing while on the back seat of the cop car. He was already going through an OD. THE NON BIASED medical report agreed with the conclusion until media and lawyers got involved.
This is why Shepard also had the media push a narrative and is still wildly believed by idiots who don't bother looking at the actual facts. Yourself included.
This is also why the onslaught of hate crime hoaxes get so much traction. The Shepard case may not be patient zero, but it didn’t help.
Bad reporting about random crimes is hardly a big deal. What you thus must object to is the positive social change that may have been accelerated by a little propaganda. Or do gays not deserve rights because Matthew Shepherd may have done meth?
The Shepard case should not be used for your cause, but that's what your side exactly did. Your side lied.
What rights do gays not have?
And do you really not see the problem with emotionally driven legislation based on lies?
Tony wants special privileges and free money supplied by the rest of us. Just like every Marxist grifter.
I don't see any "positive change" following the Shepard case. To the contrary, the destruction of the gay community and its takeover by left wing radicals rapidly accelerated after that case.
Exactly. Being a normal person who happens to be gay must be very frustrating when Marxist filth like Tony presume to speak for you.
And to be clear, as gays go, I see you in the direction of Sir Ian McKellan.
Tony is like a worse Andy Dick.
If you have to invent these events to advance your agenda, then things aren’t so bad. You just want special rights not afforded others.
Which is the way of democrat Marxist trash, like you Tony.
A shame you’re back. I thought maybe your rectum finally fatally ruptured. Guess not.
Nobody's dismissing the reality of the murder. But the simple fact is that the LGBTP and their leftist enablers have traded off this lie for years and years. In their desperate bid to play The Perpetual Victim for social/political gain, they always have to make up fictional stories to go along with it - because the reality of the matter is that America is the single-most tolerant nation on earth.
But in order to give "credibility" to their fever dreams of racism and xenophobia and bigotry - they have to sell a lie. Matthew Shepard's death had NOTHING to do with his sexuality, George Floyd's death had NOTHING to do with his race - and all the intersectionality pimps and narrative peddlers know it.
But they lie to our faces anyway, because it's the only way they can play the victim. And THAT'S what people are objecting to. Grossly distorting the facts behind a death in order to pretend that one death is "an attack on us all."
Matt Shepard was killed. Shut up LGBTP. Has nothing to do with you.
George Floyd was killed. Shut up BLM. Has nothing to do with you.
Well said
Ye dogs, that’s your takeaway? While the motive may have been misrepresented, that doesn’t change the fact that a murder occurred.
Are you stupid on purpose? Yes, the fact that the motive was misrepresented is important.
Well said
He had a lethal amount of opiates in his system. And he complained of shortness of breath before any restraint. While prolonged restraint and a failure to promptly render aid to the unresponsive Floyd was likely contributory, his death was almost certainly multifactorial and may have occurred regardless of officer actions that day. Most importantly, there is no evidence that the officers intended to harm him or that race played a role. So the official narrative is nonsense.
https://twitter.com/PeterWrangel/status/1712604551147094204?t=cEnjQhp99TR_10ckuc_2BA&s=19
The vibrant democratic multiculturalism that will be America's future is sure the sight to behold
[Link]
Shit-brained lefty fucks. They should go to Gaza if they want "Intifada Revolution" and see how much Hamas appreciates their "support".
I’m sure Tony would be welcomed with open arms. Before they through him off a building, or forced bottom surgery on him. Like they do in Iran.
Spoiler Alert: I took longer than two weeks to flatten the curve and everyone with who'd had a grade better than a D- in Calculus I up to that point knew that it's not the flatness of the curve, it's the area underneath that matters.
What difference, at this point, does it make?
The story served its purpose. On to the next narrative.
Hot take: Westboro Baptist was an astroturfing exercise aimed at suppressing religious opposition to gay marriage through fear of guilt by association.
- A civil rights lawyer and his Al Gore elector son suddenly decide to start a "church".
- Their church is composed almost entirely of family and old friends.
- It isn't associated with any other church or denomination.
- The church's sole activity is opposing gay marriage.
- They don't do this by protesting gay bars, bathhouses and pride parades, but rather the funerals of soldiers, firefighters, policeman and children, with rhetoric aimed at causing maximum outrage.
- As soon as gay marriage is achieved the church dissipates. Former members renounce it.
Interesting hypothesis. Having little knowledge of the WBC, I won't speculate on the veracity of this idea, but if it's correct, and not government sponsored: well played!
This is related to my motivation to argue with the more extreme statements/beliefs of people I otherwise agree with. When someone goes off the rails with facts, rhetoric, arguments and techniques, they drive more people away than they attract. The LGBT??/wokesters seem to be pushing that boundary. It makes sense that some might do this to intentionally, then mix with sincere extremists.
WBC being a false flag operation makes about as much sense as anything else given those facts.
Since this seems like the place.
Similar hot take: Medical care and death between family members has always been fraught with contention without regard for race, orientation, ethnicity, biological relation, or other and the whole narrative about hospitals as dens for rabid homophobes to, uh, defeat gays (but not violent drug users or pedophiles or Jews or White Supremacists, just gays, and just the married ones) by, uh, denying them visitation rights was purely a fabrication between a social worker, Lambda Legal, and the DNC.
Sure, rabidly homophobic doctors could've actually *killed* a lot more undesirable and/or politically unsympathetic gay people by following Fauci's example and proscribing ineffective or even deleterious HIV treatment regimes but, instead, they chose simply to provide them ammunition for their rights crusade by asking them for the same paperwork they would ask for of any other wayward family member, friend of the patient, or co-worker wandering the halls looking for their kin or friend... even if they didn't have the word "Gay" stamped across their forehead.
The Laramie project is still performed throughout the country. I took my kid to see it just this year. I had never heard of this follow-up. Now. I feel betrayed and lied to.
No matter how good your intentions, a lie shall remain a lie
Only if there is such thing as objective truth, or reality.
The trend these days is to embrace "alternative facts" as equally valid. Create your own "reality". The Laramie Project is simply someone else's "truth". Trump "won". Believe whatever makes you feel good.
You're not really in a position to talk since your side endorsed the lies behind the murder of Shepard.
The conventional wisdom is always carefully constructed and the facts are not the relevant. A lot of this was known in 1998 but like the George Floyd myth no one dared to mention it once the media steamroller took off. But thanks to Reason for bothering to cover this.
This is actually a good example to me of how effective gatekeeping for the narrative can be. I was in middle school when it happened. I had no clue about it when it happened. Instead, I have probably heard the story brought up every 5 years since. Each time it is framed in a way that makes it sound new and they lie about why he was killed, instead focusing on his sexuality and the brutal way he was murdered. It's only because of right-wing media that I am even somewhat aware of the drug part of it. To Binion's credit (I hate to admit that) he has shared information I hadn't yet heard in a way that runs counter to his typical sensibilities
I was in college when it happened - freshman year - and this is the second or third story I've seen today that pretty thoroughly debunks the accepted narrative.
Prior to today, I hadn't heard anything that did question it, that I can recall. I don't know how I missed ENB's article from a few years ago.
To be fair, it was a story from ENB.
They did the same with Kitty Genovese's murder in 1964. The NYT played up false stories about neighbors not getting involved.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Kitty_Genovese
THAT one, I at least knew about, before today.
My wife did not know the story either. I had to inform her that one of the killer was his former lover and that the entire thing was based on a drug and money dispute.
Similar to the Mike Brown myth. He had no less than three autopsies because no one wanted to accept the results. One by locals, another by the Feds, and yet another one crowdfunded by the family. But they all said the evidence showed he was charging officer Wilson when he was shot. Only then did the Obama administration grudgingly drop the matter. His family still got a million dollar settlement from the city though!
The local population on the Michael Brown incident knew it was a myth very early on. I'm local & helped clean up after the riots and arsons, twice, a couple months apart.
Very few people who were acting out were unaware. They just wanted an excuse.
It seems like murder is already enough of a crime that the motive shouldn't change the punishment all that much. The prosecution doesn't have to prove motive to win a conviction, only proof of the crime and who committed it.
The lesson to draw from Matthew Shepard's death is to legalize drugs so that all drug deals are drug deals gone good...In pharmacies instead of back alleys and isolated ranches...With pure but low-powered Genetically-Modified and Chemically-Modified substances instead of toxic, dangerous, "stepped-on" products...With any disputes settled in courts instead of with gangster guns on the streets.
Then, how do you stop people from buying toxic, dangerous, "Stepped-on" products if they prefer them to the low powered products?
No one, of course, would be stopped from trying to make such things for themselves, but you don't see bathtub gin made with batteries dumped in the mash selling side-by-side side with Dewar's or Beefeater's in stores. The reason is that legal products are tested for quality and purity and also consumers want quality and purIty.
the argument against your point it portland
No it's not an argument. Decriminalization is not legalizstion.
You're making a libertarian argument here, in these comments?
Bold!
Making all drugs legal isn't libertarian, that's anarchy. You just don't seem to get that.
Dennis Shepard): Don't be silent for one thing. You have to get out there and show in public that you love all of your children and you're supporting them and you believe that you should be the one making the decisions about their lives and not the legislature.
https://www.cpr.org/2023/10/12/anniversary-interview-matthew-shepard-family-lgbtq-rights/
Kinda funny, coming from the side which wants to raise your kids for you, and indoctrinate them, and call you a ‘domestic terrorist’ at the behest of those SAME ‘legislators’ (NDBA) Mr. Shepard seems to fear so much.
The same side that thinks teachers should be allowed to convince teenagers going through puberty that they were "born in the wrong body" and need hormone injections and radical surgery to correct that, and to hide that manipulation from their parents.
Not a thing that's happening anywhere.
Get a better media diet. You'll feel better.
You're mistaken. Look at Libs of Tiktok for an example.
It’s happening in a lot of places. There are video testimonials from your fellow travelers in government schools bragging about how they do this. And multiple lawsuits from families whose kids were abused I. This fashion.
All because of filth like you Tony. You really are to blame.
I see you're just as disingenuous as always. Again, if you have to live in a fake reality to be right, it may be time to reassess your positions.
"...coming from the side..."
Another fully committed team player. No thought required.
Rah rah!
He's right, that's the thing. You can't refute the facts.
Rob Debree, lead sheriff's investigator at the time, said the book contains "factual errors and lies", and deemed Jimenez's claim that Shepard was a drug dealer "truly laughable"
One bad book with no actual proof and this writer goes off
You know, it's customary to cite your source when you quote from it verbatim.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Book_of_Matt
You left this part out, @arpiniant1:
I spoke to Waters, who has since retired from the police, having seen him praise The Book of Matt on social media. "I believe to this day that McKinney and Henderson were trying to find Matthew's house so they could steal his drugs. It was fairly well known in the Laramie community that McKinney wouldn't be one that was striking out of a sense of homophobia. Some of the officers I worked with had caught him in a sexual act with another man, so it didn't fit – none of that made any sense."
Why this part was relegated to a footnote in the Wikipedia article is troubling. Next time, read from more than one viewpoint.
Wikipedia is edited by leftist activists. Read their entry on Libs of TikTok.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libs_of_TikTok
“Libs of TikTok is a handle for various far-right[a] and anti-LGBT[b] social-media accounts operated by Chaya Raichik (/ˈxɑːjə ˈraɪtʃɪk/ KHAH-yə RY-chik),[10] a former real estate agent.[11][12][13] Raichik uses the accounts to repost content created by left-wing and LGBT people on TikTok, and on other social-media platforms, often with hostile, mocking, or derogatory commentary.[14][15] The accounts have featured hate speech and false claims, especially relating to medical care of transgender children”
Totally neutral, right? It reads like a literate version of Tony edited it.
Thank you! Libertarians have an incredible animus against the gay community, to the point that a renowned Texas LP activist and "constitutional scholar" said gay people had no place in the party. To promote a book that has been thoroughly discredited is just one more notch in Reason's (and Libertarians') anti-gay track record.
Is this what the retarded voices in your head tell you?
Read my comment above, Anastasia. Don't omit information like that again.
The lesson is don't believe anything except your own lying eyes without applying the appropriate amount of disbelief. Some media stories are true and some are false but most are a combination of the two having been filtered through the biases and agendas of those telling the story.
Interestingly, as explained, the source of the homophobia narrative was the defense counsel, while the prosecution put greed as the motive.
It hardly matters. What matters is your own motive in relitigating this murder. A random drug dispute means nothing. Matthew Shepherd the narrative accelerated legal gay rights. So even if it is a lie, it was a useful one.
I AM Making a Good Salary from Home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing, under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone. go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart
OPEN GO HERE↠↠↠ http://Www.DailyPro7.COM
It actually does matter, Tony. Your side lied about the story and continues to lie to promote agendas like intersectional feminism and other false ideologies that threaten the livelihoods of people. We get stuff like cancel culture as a result.
Shepard's father put it best: don't use Matt to promote political agenda.
Tony approves of those things.
So you would support blood libel? It's a lie but there are those that find it useful to support their agenda. So what is the difference?
Tony is a half retard sociopathic deviant.
it matters for those of us who value truth
Truth is white supremacy.
It resulted in the Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009; hate crime legislation doesn’t “expand rights”, it is useless.
“Useful” to totalitarian leftists like you. Harmful to gays and lesbians.
How do you tolerate subnormal Marxist filth like Tony attempting to speak for you?
Being gay isn't my identity or my entire life. And it's not like Tony or his ilk are important.
Most gay men just ignore all this madness. The gay social and sports clubs we used to have aren't really needed anymore because we are so widely accepted. I used to be in all gay organizations, now I'm just participating in mainstream organizations.
I think Christians have a much harder time with the takeover over their institutions by leftists because institutions actually are central to Christianity. Ask Catholics how they feel about their Marxist pope...
binion writes, "shepard's murder was, without a doubt, an act of hate and violence", really? there is no evidence of any hate, just an act of violence caused by a drug deal gone bad. why do people always have to attribute violence to "hate". you can kill someone for not paying their drug debts without hating the person. for the drug dealer it's just business.
GigaWut???
It is the same as the Harvey Milk story. I'll bet 99% of the people who know anything about Harvey Milk believe he was killed because he was gay, when that had absolutely nothing to do with it. It is wild that the two highest profile gay-hate stories in the last 50 years both had nothing to do with gay-ness (and for the record, I support gay marriage and leaving people the hell alone to live their own lives).
I’m personally not in favor of gay marriage, but my preference is to eliminate all marriage licensing so it isn’t my problem in any way. And it says a lot that these activists have to constantly lie about all these ‘hate crimes’.
What's next: Donald Trump is fighting a secret war against giant green aliens? Why is Reason reprinting falsehoods debunked a decade ago? Jimenez's book is QAnon-level conspiracy theory garbage, unfit for publication here. If you don't like hate crime protections for LGBTQ persons, make that argument like an intellectual would - don't resort to nonsense conspiracy theory.
For one thing, McKinney him never admitted homosexuality and described himself as a "drunk homofobick [sic]” in a letter written from prison. If inserting a gay angle was simply a legal survival strategy for Price and McKinney in the weeks and months after the crime, why did McKinney continue to describe himself as “homofobick” when he was in prison - long after he had any hope of getting off on a “gay panic” defense?
Jimenez offers no proof other than hearsay from anonymous meth addicts that Shephard knew his murderer, much less had sex with them. (That's if you believe that these sources exist, which you'd be a fool to believe that.) Here is the direct quote from the only non-anonymous source for this link - Thomas “Doc” O'Connor, a Laramie chauffeur and operator of the Lincoln Escort Service. O'Connor told Jimenez that one night, McKinney and two other men were fooling around in the back seat of his limousine, and that “Matt may have been one of the guys in back [of the limo] with Aaron. ... I can't say for sure.”
Hmm, "I can't say for sure..." is not really the smoking gun that Jimenez makes it out to be.
Also, most homophobic violence comes from "straight" men who feel shame for their urges. . .these beatings are often worse when the shame is attached to actual sexual content. Which is to say that simply having a little gay sex doesn't automatically make one innocent of homophobia.
Anyway, there's a complete debunking of this nonsense conspiracy theory over at mediamatters. I encourage all to read it. Reason is a disgrace for running this garbage. Does the Free Minds in the masthead mean "completely abandoning fact when it disagrees with our world view?" The Enlightenment thinkers that this rag ostensibly hold up as models of Reason were pretty clear that freedom of thought was only gained through rigorous scientific examination of one's own beliefs.
I spoke to Waters, who has since retired from the police, having seen him praise The Book of Matt on social media. “I believe to this day that McKinney and Henderson were trying to find Matthew’s house so they could steal his drugs. It was fairly well known in the Laramie community that McKinney wouldn’t be one that was striking out of a sense of homophobia. Some of the officers I worked with had caught him in a sexual act with another man, so it didn’t fit – none of that made any sense.”
Jimenez did his research. You have not. You have been deceived by the media’s narrative. But you can repent of your errors. It's not too late to start changing yourself.
If anyone else wishes to refute TCKF, have the honor.