Chicago Teachers Union Boss Sends Son to Private School
Stacy Davis Gates, the president of the Chicago Teachers Union, previously said school choice is for "racists."

The head of the Chicago Teachers Union who has described school choice as "the choice of racists" sends her son to a private school.
Stacy Davis Gates, who was elected as president of the Chicago Teachers Union in 2022, has long derided school choice—a wide range of policies that make it easier for parents to send their children to schools other than their local public school, often by getting back some of the government funding that would have followed their child to public school—as inherently racist.
"*School choice* was actually the choice of racists," Gates tweeted in August 2022. "It was created to avoid integrating schools with Black children. Now it's the civil rights struggle of our generation?"
In a letter she wrote earlier this month, Gates explained her decision to enroll her son in a private school while her other two children remained in Chicago Public Schools (CPS).
Chicago classrooms are "struggling to recover from waves of school closings and disinvestment under previous mayors. Public and charter high schools in our Black and Brown neighborhoods are living and breathing examples of inequality," she wrote. "For my husband and me, it forced us to send our son, after years of attending a public school, to a private high school so he could live out his dream of being a soccer player while also having a curriculum that can meet his social and emotional needs."
This excuse misses key context. While Gates is right that school systems across the nation, including in Chicago, are still reeling from pandemic-era setbacks, she herself led the charge to keep Chicago Public Schools closed sporadically as late as early 2022. When CPS announced a two-week shutdown in January 2022, Gates told The New York Times that the closure was necessary for schools to "get themselves together."
Gates also frames CPS as underfunded, describing "decades of systemic underinvestment in marginalized communities." However, over the past five academic years, CPS' operating budget has actually skyrocketed—increasing from $5.92 billion to $8.49 billion, despite enrollment dropping by nearly 40,000 students over the same period.
Further, in consistently framing school choice advocates as racist, Gates also ignores the fact that minority parents are often the strongest supporters of school choice. According to a RealClear Opinion Research poll from earlier this summer, 73 percent of black respondents supported school choice, the highest of any demographic group. At least 70 percent of other demographic groups also support school choice policies.
But Gates is correct about a core part of her justification for sending her child to a private school: CPS is failing to serve families and students. Despite spending an eye-popping $29,000 per pupil, three-quarters of CPS students failed to meet state standards in a reading test this year. Over 80 percent failed to meet state standards in math.
"You are making a choice because perhaps, I assume, you can afford to do that, that a lot of Chicago parents don't because they can't afford it," CNN Primetime host Abby Phillip told Gates during an interview last week. "Proponents of school choice say the state should have a role in helping those families who can't afford it make the same choice that you did for your family."
"The school choice movement was a cudgel for integration in this country, that is a fact," Gates responded.
Gates understandably wants her son to have the opportunity to attend the best school for him to, as she put it, "live out his dream." But she doesn't seem to see a problem with denying other parents that same choice—or framing them as collaborating with racists for doing so.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Classic commie move, by a commie.
Take away choices and better alternatives for the peasants, declare that said alternatives are bad and must be avoided, and then make sure the elite are the only ones with access to the good stuff.
This playbook is old and tired
Some animals are more equal than others.
It's an insult to animals to compare them to this woman.
I get paid over 220 Dollars per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. i never thought i’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 15k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. it was all true and has totally changed my life. This is what I do, check it out by Visiting Following Website
Click Here.. →→ http://Www.Easywork7.com
Umm, calling people racist is their main source of power. They are gonna do it. Mock them for their evil if you get the chance. Do not let them govern.
Her mistake was entering the upper echelons of the teacher's union while she still had school age children. Most union bosses and politicians are smart enough to have their kids graduated from a private school before they waif into the school choice debate.
Do as I say, not as I do, bitches.
Maybe she was “feeling the spirit”
https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/sanfrancisco/news/san-francisco-mayor-london-breed-defends-criticism-after-video-dancing-maskless-night-club/
From the link:
Last November, she was criticized for gathering with people from outside her household for a dinner at the French Laundry during a fall COVID surge.
The French Laundry again?
I think the place got more visible name recognition after Anthony Bourdain did an episode of his show there. Now its kind of the culinary equivalent of what Studio 54 was for the upper-class left in the late 70s and early 80s.
A place to snort coke and get a blowjob in the VIP room?
In wealthy circles (especially tech money, and Hollywood money), it’s been well known for a while since it’s one of only 14 3-star (Michelin rating) restaurants in the USA, the first one to reach that rating outside of NYC, and is currently regarded by many as the single “best” restaurant in the country, probably because of its proximity to where so many of the top domestic wines are produced.
Bourdain probably increased awareness among those who can’t really afford to eat there, or who would have to save for years to cover the cost of a single meal.
Chicago Teachers Union Boss Sends Son to Private School.
Truth in headlines:
Stacy Davis Gates, the president of the Chicago Teachers Union, by her own words, is a racist.
“The head of the Chicago Teachers Union who has described school choice as ‘the choice of racists’ sends her son to a private school.”
Get out of town!
Seriously, since when do Democrats (and their constituents) have a prob with “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others”?
$29,000 per pupil… So an Independent Contractor teaching 30-students at the Commie-Education wages would make $870,000/year while the expected yearly teaching hours in Illinois is 1080 hours = $805/hour.
Course that’s what Commie is all about. Stealing with the ‘gov-guns’ and there is no limit to the amount of greed, projection and excuses Criminals use to STEAL-by-guns more, more, more. It's way past time to see what $800/hour can do in the free-market.
When an upper middle class bureaucrat must represent themselves as being the voice of the proles while still exercising the privileges of the nomenklatura, leads to some pretzel logic.
We will be a lot better off when we start jailing and executing Marxists. Instead of allowing them to run government, business, etc.
Few things are more libertarian than putting down a devout Marxist.
How many people have you murdered over politics? C'mon tough guy, don't be a pussy and say zero.
Communists aren’t people.
As tempting and justified as it is to (just) blame Gates, I can't get past the fact that 3/4 of CPD families are paying $29K for failing performance. I'm dubious about how much difference handing them (back) $29K to not care where *else* they send their kid to school would make.
It very much feels like a multi-generational version of Jordan Peterson's question about the 10% of the population that's too stupid to be cannon fodder.
They're not the ones paying it, for one thing. Or it's invisible to them. But property taxes hit wide. So there's no real accountability, and if anyone tries to complain, they'll be lambasted as "not caring about the education of children", no matter how appalling of a job the education system is doing of it.
I've had morons tell me, in so many words, that it does not matter how badly the school system is doing, they will always support more money for it, and the reason it's failing is because it doesn't have enough money. And a complete and utter failure to achieve the stated goals is no reason to consider revamping anything.
"Liberal is a Hypocrite."
A story as old as time, told 10 million different ways.
They're not hypocrites; they're actually superior to you and me.
(/sarc just in case.)
If it weren't for double standards, progressives would have no standards at all.
Boy, if you thought Chicago was a shithole before, just wait and see how a few years of Black Liberationists being in charge of the place will go.
I'm shocked, shocked I tell you, to learn that this Marxist cunt is a hypocrite. Who could have possibly seen that coming?
So “school choice” in this context implies that the government subsidizes private schools as well as public schools with tax money. It’s not the same thing as choosing to pay to send your child to a private school and pay school taxes to support the public school system. The only way to eliminate “school choice” would be to ban private education and make attendance at public schools mandatory for all children. This would be the equivalent of “Medicare for All” with penalties for providing medical treatment outside the official system. It would be better if Reason writers would make such fine points clear in their articles.
You pay whether or not you attend. Do you really think there's a point in calling that a choice? You can buy this car or that car but you'll pay for this car either way you chose.
Yes, I do call that choice. You can choose to violate a bad law and go to prison. You can choose to pay twice so your child will get a better education. Note that I did not say that it was "free choice."
Touche... Though I don't know of many people who consider ...
being held-up by a gun and threatened (gov-gun) to support their cause/gain part of the "choices" arena.
Sure they can chose to fight the armed-criminal and be kidnapped or shot or they can just hand over their wallet. So many ?choices?.
Such a lame pseudo-argument. No one is arguing the semantics you are arguing. We are arguing about poor and middle class families that maybe can't afford an alternative to public school having the opportunity to send their kids to a better, and sometimes private, school like the upper classes do now because they can afford it. This can be done by "giving" the money to the kid so the parents can decide where to send their kid to school. That is the argument. Do you have an opinion on that? No one is interested in your stupid argument.
There you have it. Straight from the horse's mouth: private schools are rayciss but let's not leave out charter schools and home schooling. They're all rayciss because responsible parents want for their children a good education instead of woke indoctrination and brain washing. They want their children to learn math, science, proper English, civics and history. They wish for their children to grow up as responsible, productive citizens and not habitual criminals, gang bangers and drug addicts, not having children out of marriage and become a welfare dependent slobs.
One rule for me...Another for Thee.
30,000 white girls, raped by black males, every year! It's far more common than school shootings. White families want school choice to protect their daughters from rape.
Check out Ray Epps over here.
Great comment.
Do the feds actually know the numbers?
If they did, they'd lie about them.
Isn't amazing how all policies that people on the left disagree with are somehow racist? It's become so tiring watching the left constantly use the claim of racism or some other type "ism" in order to avoid the substance of an issue.
The party of slavery (racism) loves to project. It's the only tool they have in their [WE] skin-color, gender, wealth-status mob RULES "democracy". A [WE] mob RULES the 'icky' ones has to find a definition between the [WE] and the 'icky'.
Serious question: what does "[WE]" mean?
The hidden "We" propaganda-noun of collectivist minds (i.e. Communists).
The opposite of Individualism. A term used all over the Democratic Platform to pretend no-one is an Individual thus no-one has Individual Liberty or Justice only the [WE] 'noun' does.
Progressives, conservatives and libertarians see the world through different lenses.
With progressives it's all about victimhood. To them the world consists of the oppressed and the oppressors.
With conservatives it's all about existential threats. There's always some enemy trying to tear things down.
With libertarians it's all about coercion. We see value cooperation and see force as a last resort.
So with the left it's no surprise that they go straight to racism, because that explains whatever the issue is in terms of oppression.
+1000 Well Said.. Except the 'emergency' existential threats isn't a conservative thing at any substantial amount compared to the victim-hood parties existential threat (hut-hum: climate change, COVID, etc, etc, etc).
There's plenty of historically racist policies that the left is in love with, and they're perfectly able to ignore the "original sin" in those ideas while they'll shamelessly insist that past abuses are sufficient reason to justify setting aside any conception of whatever they want to stop anyway.
A few examples:
Many of the earliest "gun safety" laws were enacted in the south in the late 19th century for the purpose of preventing freed slaves from obtaining firearms as protection against attacks by racially motivated terrorist groups, including the KKK which were coincidentally also ingrained in to the structure of the Democrat party in the region about as thoroughly as the Teachers Unions are ingrained into the modern version of that Party.
The FHA, as established by FDR's New Deal, essentially made racial "redlining" the law of the land in mortgage lending for almost 50 years, and the carry-over of FHA boilerplate into the language of "GI Mortgages" issued after WW2 essentially created a de-facto state of racial segregation in the early suburbs which largely consisted of tract housing sold to borrowers returning after the war.
The "closed shop" policies with the unions across the entire "Hollywood" studio system, and the resulting restricted access to most jobs within that industry was a huge contributor to the lack of diversity in that industry which has been criticized widely from within and outside the system even in recent decades. The need to have connections within a certain union has been a barrier to access for a more racially diverse pool of workers, and the up-front charges to get into any of the unions/guilds (in the case of many "below the line" jobs, the fee can equal months of take-home pay for those working full time) are a barrier which makes it harder for those who don't have family resources to help create access to that kind of work.
My understanding is that the original "minimum wage" laws were explicitly racist. As were the original marijuana prohibition laws.
I've heard that about minimum wage, but I don't understand how that kind of law would disparately affect unskilled (or low-skilled) workers of different races.
I've also heard that enforcement around pot was ramped up under Nixon for the purpose of mainly jailing black people, but I don't know if those were new laws or just a change in enforcement priority. I've also heard that early pot prohibition was largely driven by the William Hearst (who may have grown up with a relatively "enlightened" attitude on race for his time, if the depiction of his father in Deadwood was accurate) who mainly wanted to limit competition for his paper mills. Hard to say what's true in all that.
Sometimes the culture war comes for you, Reason. But sure, you just keep sitting on the sidelines.
You’re right! The Reason staffers should fight by becoming bold comment section warriors! That’ll make a difference!
With the amount of Nazi-Indoctrination coming from Commie-Education (highlighted right here at Reason) it just might. I like to think humans aren't inherently stupid just stupidified by their own greed or/and Nazi-Indoctrination.
Union Leader Exposed as Hypocrite
In other News at 11:
Water Is Wet
Puppies Are Cute
What else is new! My kids attended private school in Chicago with the Daleys, Obamas and Emanuels. This takes the hypocrisy to a whole new level!
Stacy Davis Gates' school choice rules for thee and not for me provides another classic example of Rob Henderson’s Luxury Beliefs, and of course shameless hypocrisy.
Well...turns out she was right after all. School choice IS for racists.
"Stacy Davis Gates, the president of the Chicago Teachers Union, previously said school choice is for "racists.""
Not sure about that, but at least one hypocrite is included
Here's the fact of school choice - it will result in better outcomes for parents who are heavily involved in the education of their children - as one would hope is the case for someone in Stacy Gates position. On the whole, you can get a better education for your children in many private schools than you can in most public schools.
However, for the all too many parents who are struggling to get by & too often in the case of neglectful parents, they are too involved in their personal issues to research the private schools or pay the extra money above whatever vouchers might be offered. Their kids will end up attending public schools which have had their funding drained by the voucher system or private schools that are the kind of scam schools that were promoted by Betsy DeVos & her husband.
So school choice - good for some families, a disaster for the many who are on the margins of society. But then, that is a frequent bias of conservatives. Many believe that everyone in the USA has equal opportunity & failure is a character flaw, not the result of circumstances.
Full disclosure - I went to a private school & went from being a C student in public school who was trying to hide to a B student - still trying to hide but needing to hide at a higher standard ;-). My parents weren't heavily involved but I was lucky that I had a wealthy grandfather who provided the means for the better education. As I said, for those who can afford it, many private schools offer a far better outcome. However, vouchers will further reduce the people (& children) on the margins.
There are issues with public education that could be improved. Undercutting public education will not achieve that.
"However, for the all too many parents who are struggling to get by"
STEAL MORE from THEM!!! /s
"Many believe that everyone in the USA has equal opportunity & failure is a character flaw, not the result of circumstances."
The circumstances that aren't a character flaw is gov-gun "armed-theft"...
Your logic will always fail because you fail to acknowledge that gov-guns don't teach... People teach... The 'guns' just STEAL.
How many lies can you pack into a comment?
I make more then $12,000 a month online. It’s enough to comfortably replace my old jobs income, especially considering I only work about 11 to 12 hours a week from home. I was amazed how easy it was after I tried it… ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://workscoin1.pages.dev/
I made a million a month. Your program sucks!