12-Year-Old Boy Removed From School Over 'Don't Tread on Me' Patch
"The Gadsden flag is a proud symbol of the American revolution," says Colorado Gov. Jared Polis.

Jaiden is a 12-year-old boy who attends the Vanguard School in Colorado Springs, Colorado. He is the subject of a video that went viral on social media; it shows the boy and his mother confronting a school administrator who asserts that the Gadsden flag patch on his backpack violates district policy.
"The reason that we do not want the flag displayed is due to its origins with slavery and the slave trade," says the administrator.
Meet 12yo Jaiden who was kicked out of class yesterday in Colorado Springs for having a Gadsden flag patch, which the school claims has "origins with slavery."
The school's director said via email that the patch was "disruptive to the classroom environment."
Receipts in the ???? pic.twitter.com/qQ8jK1zSpR
— Connor Boyack ???? (@cboyack) August 29, 2023
On Monday, school officials removed Jaiden from class due to his Gadsden flag patch. His mother has fought back against this disciplinary action, explaining that the flag—a coiled snake above the phrase "Don't tread on me"—is not a pro-slavery image; it has its origins in the Revolutionary War and was intended as a symbol of resistance to British tyranny.
District officials did not respond to a request for comment, but Libertas Institute President Connor Boyack—who first publicized Jaiden's situation—shared an email that they sent to Jaiden's mother, in which the district reiterated its position that the Gadsden flag is an "unacceptable symbol" tied to "white-supremacy" and "patriot" groups.
It's true that some white supremacists have appropriated the flag. But so have classical liberals and libertarians—including Reason (check out our 404 Error page). Some lefty groups have cited Gadsden too. There's even a pro-LGBT version.
In any case, Jaiden's mother is absolutely correct that the flag's origins have nothing to do with racism or slavery. In their email, district officials approvingly cited a 2016 Washington Post article by Reason's Eugene Volokh evaluating an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) case. The case in question involved a post office employee whose Gadsden flag hat had generated racial harassment claims. But ultimately, the EEOC declined to rule that the Gadsden flag was a racist symbol.
The Supreme Court has ruled that K-12 officials have significant authority to limit students' free expression rights in order to promote classroom cohesion. But the school cannot discriminate against Jaiden's viewpoint by wrongly and arbitrarily declaring the Gadsden flag to be a hate symbol.
"There is nothing inherently disruptive about a student displaying a Gadsden flag patch on his backpack," writes Aaron Terr, director of public advocacy at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression. "Public school administrators can't ban the expression of an idea, symbol, or viewpoint just because they personally dislike it."
Democratic Colorado Gov. Jared Polis also came to Jaiden's defense, describing the flag's message as "iconic" in a post on X.
"The Gadsden flag is a proud symbol of the American revolution and [an] iconic warning to Britain or any government not to violate the liberties of Americans," wrote Polis. "It appears on popular American medallions and challenge coins through today and Ben Franklin also adopted it to symbolize the union of the 13 colonies. It's a great teaching moment for a history lesson!"
When reached for comment by Reason, Polis reaffirmed his comment and noted that he also agreed with sentiments expressed by Rep. Ted Lieu (D–Calif.).
"I oppose banning the Gadsden flag in schools for the same reason I oppose conservative schools districts that ban LGBTQ flags in schools," wrote Lieu. "Let kids be their authentic selves and give them a world of information—students can figure out what's important to them."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So dreamy.❤
He really is.
Reason righty gets dragged for their fawning of Polis, but good for him on this one.
The kid is admirable, but using the term "dreamy" might summon SPB2. Let's not do that.
“I oppose banning the Gadsden flag in schools for the same reason I oppose conservative schools districts that ban LGBTQ flags in schools,” wrote Lieu.
So, are we going to question whether Ted “I would love to regulate speech, but the 1A won’t let me.” Lieu conflated citizens and communities "banning" their publicly-funded schools from flying LGBTQ flags as policy with children choosing to wear the Gadsden flag and being prevented by agents of the state or are we still too busy substantiating the claims of Ron DeSantis’ discussion of Penny Hopper in a manner that conforms to our political opinoins?
What about kids wearing the
resistor color coding chartLGBTQ flag?They just gave us a perfect way to get rid of the rainbow flag, the blm flag etc. You need to get some patriot group to appropriate the symbol and voila now it is a symbol of “white supremacy” I mean it worked for the OK sign.
It doesn’t work that way son.
It's not supposed to work that way but recent evidence suggests that in fact it does.
Only because 4chan hasn't figured out a way to do that yet.
It's a rainbow. What color do you get when you put light from all those colors together?
"Nothing says perfection like white"--President Snow
I mean it worked for the OK sign.
Tweak it slightly. Switch the red and orange stripes in the order, make all the colors slightly more sepia-toned, frame the whole thing with a thin white border... something.
Just to add to the nefarious mystique, undermine the whole "I'm an individual." ethos when they shout "Quit copying!" and/or just to generally fuck with them.
There are already several versions of a "Let's Offend Everybody At Once" Flag.
Here are the two most comprehensive in their offense-giving vitriol:
https://images-cdn.9gag.com/photo/aBwoLMA_700b.jpg
https://images-cdn.9gag.com/photo/aNn61eG_700b.jpg
Oh wait! Neither of them include the Atheist "A", either the old Atheist Atom or the new circled "A" made with a single pen stroke! Damn it! Now I'm offended for being left out!
🙂
😉
Talk about appropriation.
Join the inductance!
Their slogan would be Choke on This, or maybe their mascot is named Henry.
Conflating is all the media does these days. I have no problem with teachers having pride flags on their cars or even on their clothing. But I do have a problem with posting it in the building or flying it outside on the grounds.
Further, without knowing where you and your fellow taxpayers live, if you all decide to offer teachers a pink slip for wearing rainbows at school, that's your tax dollars at work. If, OTOH, an administrator decides, of their own accord, to teach that 2+2=5 or The Gadsden Flag was a symbol of slavery, that really kinda starts to look like misappropriation.
>>the district reiterated its position
the double-down is delicious.
Sounds to me like the school district just committed to (1) consuming a huge slice of humble pie in the near future, and (2) pumping up this young man's college fund with the judgement he and his lawyer are pretty much sure to win.
Way to go ignorant, wanna be tyrant, liberal educators!! I love to watch these people commit self-destructive actions.
the school district just committed to (1) consuming a huge slice of humble pie
Or at least 30 Days in the Hole.
Have we just given up on tar and feathers?
30 Days in the Hole, by Humble Pie
Better watch what you say. They'll be calling you a radical...
I keep getting suspended by Twitter for using those words
That's when you know you're jailhouse-bound.
Isn’t that what Shreek does with the young boys he kidnaps?
One would hope.
Leftists should be brutally punished at every opportunity. They specially so they can learn the lesson they it is not ok to be a leftist.
Crowbars are a good starting point. Immolation is a happy ending.
Could be a nice payday in this for the family. Clearly the leftists running the school district need to learn some career ending lessons.
Problem is that the "leftists" wouldn't be footing the bill, the taxpayers would.
NO STEP ON SNEK
But the kid should be thrown out for having a name like Jaiden.
>>for having a name like Jaiden.
this. at least punch mom in the face for it
edit: I'm sure he'll want to in a couple years
I was just thinking the kid has a really slappable face.
Could be worse. Jaydyn.
Or even Jdn.
J'Aidhen
J'ayd'n
Gaden -- but pronounced Jayden and you always correct people for pronouncing it with the hard G.
Is that like J’Quellin?
There was a basketball or football player a couple years ago named SirValiant Brown. I like it.
My current favorite NFL name is DiCaprio Bootle. Wish he got more playing time.
Best name ever in the NBA - World B. Free.
word. got his autograph at the Spectrum when I was a kid.
Humorously on the same topic; Obama's FBI listed belief in the US Constitution as a mark of terrorism. The left is literally in an ideological battle against the USA and any patriots it can find.
Liar.
Says the liar.
"Many militia extremists view themselves as protecting the U.S. Constitution, other U.S. laws, or their own individual liberties. They believe that the Constitution grants citizens the power to take back the federal government by force or violence if they feel it’s necessary. They oppose gun control efforts and fear the widespread disarming of Americans by the federal government."
http://web.archive.org/web/20120915111407/http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2011/september/militia_092211
I saw something very similar on an FBI or Homeland Security domestic terrorism report in about 2007/2008. So there is nothing new from the Bush admin to the Obama admin. In fact, there was a kerfuffle about that older report because it specifically mentioned libertarian and the report was released during the RP 2008 election campaign. The conspiracy theorists who pervaded that campaign had a great time uncovering stuff.
They are only wrong insofar as they make a categorical error.
The Consitution is not the foundational document of our nation. It is the organizational and operational document of our present govrrnment.
The Declaration of Independence is our foundational document. One that plainly states it is the right of the people to "take back" the government when it exceeds its rightful boundaries.
Present government flunkies and functionaries notwithstanding.
The Constitution is the founding document because the Independence of the United States was not in doubt and because it is the supreme law of the land.
The Declaration of Independence expressed the Founders’ ideals on Natural Rights, their grievances against King George III, and the resolve to break free of his rule, but The Declaration of Independence was not a legal document.
If anything, it was an illegal document and every signatory if caught would have hung by the neck until dead had the Patriots not succeeded in throwing off the British Empire.
Both the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence are admirable documents, but with different purposes.
They believe that the Constitution grants citizens the power to take back the federal government by force or violence if they feel it’s necessary.
You/they are a traitor you dumb fuckstick.
You -- Anyone who protects the definition of the USA (US Constitution) is a traitor to the UN-Constitutional [Na]tional So[zi]alist Empire conquering the USA from within...
Funny how you Nazi-fanboys can't seem to understand UR the enemy in this nation.
Why do you think the 2nd Amendment was written?
Because they didn't have typewriters or computers yet?
^---- This.
No, as a Soros loving Marxist, YOU are the traitor. You’re also a pedophile.
Kill yourself.
You/they are a traitor you dumb fuckstick.
Any country controlled by your side deserves to be overthrown. You're not the counter-culture anymore.
You rape little boys, and jack off to videos of little boys being raped. You should be tortured to death.
From a 1775 letter about the Don't Tread on Me rattlesnake. The letter is credited to Benjamin Franklin (who among his other achievements seems to have been the lyricist for Metallica):
"I recollected that her eye excelled in brightness, that of any other animal, and that she has no eye-lids—She may therefore be esteemed an emblem of vigilance.—She never begins an attack, nor, when once engaged, ever surrenders: She is therefore an emblem of magnanimity and true courage."
https://www.americanheritage.com/rattle-snake-symbol-america
Didn't he want the turkey to be our national bird though?
That's a common myth. Really he didn't want the eagle, but never actually proposed the turkey. He just pointed out how the turkey was a nobler, braver bird than the eagle.
And, IIRC his aversion to the eagle had to do with it being a too common element in monarchical symbolism.
“Let kids be their authentic selves and give them a world of information—students can figure out what's important to them."
I liken this to allowing children to play, on a playground, absent a published list of no less than 103 rules and strict adherence thereto.
Anything less is literally hating children because somebody might get hurt, or worse, offended.
"patriot" groups.
Oh the horror people who are proud to be American. Can't have that. Must ban any symbol that creates pride in our country. Remind me again who are the seditious crowd here?
Exactly.
That has been the whole point behind morphing hard core racists like the KKK into "White Nationalists". A war of words to associate anyone who might believe in America First, for any reason, with the folks most reviled in the US. Propaganda 101.
Alas, it works. At least for a goodly swath of the populace, like the teacher who unquestioningly calls a Revolutionary era symbol "Associated with slavery"
If someone considers a group called the "Oath Keepers" to be dangerous radical far right extremists because they actually take their oaths of office and oaths of service to the Constitution seriously, it makes you wonder what that someone wants to do to us.
Why would you wonder?
They're pretty fucking obvious about it.
"The reason that we do not want the flag displayed is due to its origins with slavery and the slave trade."
Oh my, the Stars and Bars? Or haven't they gotten that brave yet?
They're never brave. They only do that shit when they are in their echo chambers, and are aghast when they get confronted by anyone who rightly calls them fucking nuts.
Half of modern politics is pretending to be offended. Poli-Sci classes probably spend a week on how to literally, and figuratively, do the "clutching my pearls" gesture.
The Stars and Stripes have the same origins. But yeah, it is considered a right wing symbol, especially if the stars are in a circle, like the first flag of the USA.
For Round 2, the kid should juxtapose a “The 1619 Project is a lie.” patch next to The Stars and Bars on his backpack and, when they tell him they both have to come off, that they have to pick one. Either the Stars and Bars originated with slavery well after Independence or The Stars and Bars didn’t originate with slavery.
Wear a Stars and Bars flag made with the rainbow colors and people's heads will explode.
Seriously though, I am sure there are some idiots that think the Scottish flag is a confederate symbol just because it has a big X on it.
Even Polis knows this is a bridge too far.
For now...
One of the many ?blessings? of Commie-Education.
USA Commie-Education and Socialist Security; who would-a-thunkit? Just to name a couple of literally hundreds.
You're an idiot. You hate the Constitution and wish for a Confederate uprising to overthrow the USA.
The southern Democrat Confederate uprising? Now, now; UR just dismantling into delusions now. Maybe its finally time to give up your socialist utopian dream take-over of the USA and become a USA patriot honoring the US Constitution above democracy and Individual Liberty and Justice for all. You can do it; you'll feel a lot better.
The flag has "origins with slavery," except for the states that didn't allow slavery, and except for the fact that it was a protest against what was then considered tyrannical government, but which would now be considered a dangerously laissez-faire banana republic with irresponsible levels of austerity, and lacking in even the most common sense regulations.
Considering the British Crown were some of the largest slave trader financers at the time, the Garden flag could if you squint enough actually be anti-slavery.
The New Socialist Liberal Bill of Rights:
1. Conform or pay the price!
OK, so the problem everyone should have here is with how grossly misinformed our so-called "educators" (to say nothing of our politicians) are. They don't actually know the origins or intended purpose of these things they talk about.
> "I oppose banning the Gadsden flag in schools for the same reason I oppose conservative schools districts that ban LGBTQ flags in schools," wrote Lieu.
Which tells us he doesn't understand either.
The Gadsden flag has nothing to do with slaves or slavery. The LGBTP flag is flat out hate speech and an open, contemptuous display of intolerance. And yet, somehow the Gadsden one is the one that's problematic, and the LGBTP one is accepted?
Are we sure this is about the flags and their meaning, and not about the partisan interests backing each of them respectively? Anyone? Bueller?
I remember in Science class in the 60s when the teacher said airplanes fly because the front of the wing is higher than the back. I tried to tell him about the Bernoulli's Principle. It didn't work.
Gadsden himself owned a large number of slaves in South Carolina and directly or indirectly imported African slaves. Although the flag has nothing whatever to do with slavery or white supremacy, Gadsden himself did. No libertarian could ever excuse slavery and still claim to be a libertarian. History is what it is, although new facts and evaluations can alter interpretations and conclusions concerning it in retrospect. Trying to spin history doesn't help anyone's position in the culture wars ... it just discredits their effort.
Gadsden himself owned a large number of slaves in South Carolina and directly or indirectly imported African slaves.
Which has shit-all to do with the teacher's stupid claims. It's just a lazy guilt-by-association argument, sort of like marxists arguing that the US is evil because it once had slavery and still doesn't guarantee 100 percent equal outcomes for every single person.
Working part-time, I bring in more than $27,000 USD per month. I listened to a variety of people explain to me how much money they would reasonably expect to make online, so it’s still difficult to determine. It did become genuine, and it completely db40 altered my life. Everyone should now just try this line of work.
By using this website—————>>> https://www.dailypay7.com/
Of course, "libertarian" folks will let school administrators off the hook for their actions. It seems school boards and administrators violate parents, students, and the public's rights on nearly a daily basis, but the libertarian movement is once again silent, like they were during the covid pandemic.
Eat a dick, troll.
If you think libertarians were silent you’ve been listening to the wrong libertarians.
And FYi Reason is not a good voice for libertarianism.
You don't get out much do you?
And Babylon Bee, as usual, is right on it,
https://babylonbee.com/news/kid-suspended-for-being-in-possession-of-history-book-with-us-flag-on-cover
Bingo!
It's shit like this why we need more Gadsen Flags.
Although I do admit the Gadsen flag has been appropriated by way too many people and has become essentially meaningless. And even adopted ironically by states rights movements. Still this is going to backfire on the haters so much that I've placed an order for moar popcorn.
The Libertarian version with the porcupine in the center and the motto "Don't Tread On Anyone" has a touch of modernity and universality. Only functionally illiterate public officials--but I repeat myself--could misunderstand it.
"On Monday, school officials removed Jaiden from class due to his Gadsden flag patch."
Ironic, don't ya think?
There is no downside to such attacks for culture warriors seeking to exhaust the targets of their ideological umbrage. No one will ever be punished for violating the First Amendment rights of students in their schools; and no one will ever be punished for causing someone to lose their jobs or their positions by mobbing them for political incorrectness. They are free to attack people and violate their Constitutional rights repeatedly and compensate their victims using taxpayer money at no personal cost no matter how many times they are rebuked or reversed by the courts.
The administration and teacher pool is now completely under the control of uncurious, indoctrinated and poorly educated millennials.
And the Nazis appropriated swastikas, and the homosexuals appropriated gayness. But try using those for their more general meaning now, huh?
And Internet commenters appropriated Nazis.
The swastika was stupid and superstitious and thus rationally evil even before it was a symbol of genocide and tyranny, simply because the swastika was a symbol believed to bring good luck.
And goodness knows, Heterosexuals burning Homosexuals at the stake with bundles of sticks (called "faggots") were not exactly a gleeful bunch, so the Heterosexuals kind of abandoned gayness some time ago. Homosexuals were just exercising squatter's rights, so to speak.