Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

First Amendment

12-Year-Old Boy Removed From School Over 'Don't Tread on Me' Patch

"The Gadsden flag is a proud symbol of the American revolution," says Colorado Gov. Jared Polis.

Robby Soave | 8.29.2023 5:24 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Still from a video capturing Jaiden, a 12-year-old boy who attends the Vanguard School in Colorado Springs, Colorado, who was removed from school over his Gadsen flag patch | Screenshot via Connor Boyack / X
Gadsden flag (Screenshot via Connor Boyack / X)

Jaiden is a 12-year-old boy who attends the Vanguard School in Colorado Springs, Colorado. He is the subject of a video that went viral on social media; it shows the boy and his mother confronting a school administrator who asserts that the Gadsden flag patch on his backpack violates district policy.

"The reason that we do not want the flag displayed is due to its origins with slavery and the slave trade," says the administrator.

Meet 12yo Jaiden who was kicked out of class yesterday in Colorado Springs for having a Gadsden flag patch, which the school claims has "origins with slavery."

The school's director said via email that the patch was "disruptive to the classroom environment."

Receipts in the ???? pic.twitter.com/qQ8jK1zSpR

— Connor Boyack ???? (@cboyack) August 29, 2023

On Monday, school officials removed Jaiden from class due to his Gadsden flag patch. His mother has fought back against this disciplinary action, explaining that the flag—a coiled snake above the phrase "Don't tread on me"—is not a pro-slavery image; it has its origins in the Revolutionary War and was intended as a symbol of resistance to British tyranny.

District officials did not respond to a request for comment, but Libertas Institute President Connor Boyack—who first publicized Jaiden's situation—shared an email that they sent to Jaiden's mother, in which the district reiterated its position that the Gadsden flag is an "unacceptable symbol" tied to "white-supremacy" and "patriot" groups.

It's true that some white supremacists have appropriated the flag. But so have classical liberals and libertarians—including Reason (check out our 404 Error page). Some lefty groups have cited Gadsden too. There's even a pro-LGBT version.

In any case, Jaiden's mother is absolutely correct that the flag's origins have nothing to do with racism or slavery. In their email, district officials approvingly cited a 2016 Washington Post article by Reason's Eugene Volokh evaluating an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) case. The case in question involved a post office employee whose Gadsden flag hat had generated racial harassment claims. But ultimately, the EEOC declined to rule that the Gadsden flag was a racist symbol.

The Supreme Court has ruled that K-12 officials have significant authority to limit students' free expression rights in order to promote classroom cohesion. But the school cannot discriminate against Jaiden's viewpoint by wrongly and arbitrarily declaring the Gadsden flag to be a hate symbol.

"There is nothing inherently disruptive about a student displaying a Gadsden flag patch on his backpack," writes Aaron Terr, director of public advocacy at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression. "Public school administrators can't ban the expression of an idea, symbol, or viewpoint just because they personally dislike it."

Democratic Colorado Gov. Jared Polis also came to Jaiden's defense, describing the flag's message as "iconic" in a post on X.

"The Gadsden flag is a proud symbol of the American revolution and [an] iconic warning to Britain or any government not to violate the liberties of Americans," wrote Polis. "It appears on popular American medallions and challenge coins through today and Ben Franklin also adopted it to symbolize the union of the 13 colonies. It's a great teaching moment for a history lesson!"

When reached for comment by Reason, Polis reaffirmed his comment and noted that he also agreed with sentiments expressed by Rep. Ted Lieu (D–Calif.).

"I oppose banning the Gadsden flag in schools for the same reason I oppose conservative schools districts that ban LGBTQ flags in schools," wrote Lieu. "Let kids be their authentic selves and give them a world of information—students can figure out what's important to them."

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Alabama Set To Try New, Untested Execution Method

Robby Soave is a senior editor at Reason.

First AmendmentPublic schoolsFree SpeechCivil LibertiesColorado
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (101)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fats of Fury   2 years ago

    So dreamy.❤

    1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

      He really is.

    2. R Mac   2 years ago

      Reason righty gets dragged for their fawning of Polis, but good for him on this one.

    3. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

      The kid is admirable, but using the term "dreamy" might summon SPB2. Let's not do that.

  2. Fats of Fury   2 years ago (edited)
  3. mad.casual   2 years ago (edited)

    “I oppose banning the Gadsden flag in schools for the same reason I oppose conservative schools districts that ban LGBTQ flags in schools,” wrote Lieu.

    So, are we going to question whether Ted “I would love to regulate speech, but the 1A won’t let me.” Lieu conflated citizens and communities "banning" their publicly-funded schools from flying LGBTQ flags as policy with children choosing to wear the Gadsden flag and being prevented by agents of the state or are we still too busy substantiating the claims of Ron DeSantis’ discussion of Penny Hopper in a manner that conforms to our political opinoins?

    1. Unicorn Abattoir   2 years ago

      What about kids wearing the resistor color coding chart LGBTQ flag?

      1. Rockstevo   2 years ago

        They just gave us a perfect way to get rid of the rainbow flag, the blm flag etc. You need to get some patriot group to appropriate the symbol and voila now it is a symbol of “white supremacy” I mean it worked for the OK sign.

        1. VULGAR MADMAN   2 years ago

          It doesn’t work that way son.

          1. Rossami   2 years ago

            It's not supposed to work that way but recent evidence suggests that in fact it does.

          2. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

            Only because 4chan hasn't figured out a way to do that yet.

            1. Bill Dalasio   2 years ago

              It's a rainbow. What color do you get when you put light from all those colors together?

              1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

                "Nothing says perfection like white"--President Snow

        2. mad.casual   2 years ago

          I mean it worked for the OK sign.

          Tweak it slightly. Switch the red and orange stripes in the order, make all the colors slightly more sepia-toned, frame the whole thing with a thin white border... something.

          Just to add to the nefarious mystique, undermine the whole "I'm an individual." ethos when they shout "Quit copying!" and/or just to generally fuck with them.

        3. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

          There are already several versions of a "Let's Offend Everybody At Once" Flag.

          Here are the two most comprehensive in their offense-giving vitriol:

          https://images-cdn.9gag.com/photo/aBwoLMA_700b.jpg

          https://images-cdn.9gag.com/photo/aNn61eG_700b.jpg

          Oh wait! Neither of them include the Atheist "A", either the old Atheist Atom or the new circled "A" made with a single pen stroke! Damn it! Now I'm offended for being left out!
          🙂
          😉

      2. Gaear Grimsrud   2 years ago

        Talk about appropriation.

        1. Unicorn Abattoir   2 years ago

          Join the inductance!

          1. Stuck in California   2 years ago

            Their slogan would be Choke on This, or maybe their mascot is named Henry.

    2. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   2 years ago

      Conflating is all the media does these days. I have no problem with teachers having pride flags on their cars or even on their clothing. But I do have a problem with posting it in the building or flying it outside on the grounds.

      1. mad.casual   2 years ago

        Further, without knowing where you and your fellow taxpayers live, if you all decide to offer teachers a pink slip for wearing rainbows at school, that's your tax dollars at work. If, OTOH, an administrator decides, of their own accord, to teach that 2+2=5 or The Gadsden Flag was a symbol of slavery, that really kinda starts to look like misappropriation.

  4. Dillinger   2 years ago

    >>the district reiterated its position

    the double-down is delicious.

    1. Carey Allison   2 years ago

      Sounds to me like the school district just committed to (1) consuming a huge slice of humble pie in the near future, and (2) pumping up this young man's college fund with the judgement he and his lawyer are pretty much sure to win.

      Way to go ignorant, wanna be tyrant, liberal educators!! I love to watch these people commit self-destructive actions.

      1. Unicorn Abattoir   2 years ago

        the school district just committed to (1) consuming a huge slice of humble pie

        Or at least 30 Days in the Hole.

        1. R Mac   2 years ago

          Have we just given up on tar and feathers?

          1. Unicorn Abattoir   2 years ago

            30 Days in the Hole, by Humble Pie

            1. ThomasD   2 years ago

              Better watch what you say. They'll be calling you a radical...

          2. Nardz   2 years ago

            I keep getting suspended by Twitter for using those words

        2. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 years ago

          That's when you know you're jailhouse-bound.

        3. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   2 years ago

          Isn’t that what Shreek does with the young boys he kidnaps?

        4. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

          One would hope.

      2. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   2 years ago

        Leftists should be brutally punished at every opportunity. They specially so they can learn the lesson they it is not ok to be a leftist.

        1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   2 years ago

          Crowbars are a good starting point. Immolation is a happy ending.

    2. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   2 years ago

      Could be a nice payday in this for the family. Clearly the leftists running the school district need to learn some career ending lessons.

      1. jimc5499   2 years ago

        Problem is that the "leftists" wouldn't be footing the bill, the taxpayers would.

  5. Unicorn Abattoir   2 years ago

    NO STEP ON SNEK

    But the kid should be thrown out for having a name like Jaiden.

    1. Dillinger   2 years ago (edited)

      >>for having a name like Jaiden.

      this. at least punch mom in the face for it

      edit: I'm sure he'll want to in a couple years

      1. Vernon Depner   2 years ago

        I was just thinking the kid has a really slappable face.

    2. JesseAz   2 years ago

      Could be worse. Jaydyn.

      1. Unicorn Abattoir   2 years ago

        Or even Jdn.

      2. Vernon Depner   2 years ago

        J'Aidhen

        1. JesseAz   2 years ago

          J'ayd'n

          1. Stuck in California   2 years ago

            Gaden -- but pronounced Jayden and you always correct people for pronouncing it with the hard G.

        2. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   2 years ago

          Is that like J’Quellin?

          1. Nardz   2 years ago

            There was a basketball or football player a couple years ago named SirValiant Brown. I like it.
            My current favorite NFL name is DiCaprio Bootle. Wish he got more playing time.

            1. Tyval Dayall   2 years ago

              Best name ever in the NBA - World B. Free.

              1. Dillinger   2 years ago

                word. got his autograph at the Spectrum when I was a kid.

  6. TJJ2000   2 years ago

    Humorously on the same topic; Obama's FBI listed belief in the US Constitution as a mark of terrorism. The left is literally in an ideological battle against the USA and any patriots it can find.

    1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

      Liar.

      1. R Mac   2 years ago

        Says the liar.

      2. TJJ2000   2 years ago

        "Many militia extremists view themselves as protecting the U.S. Constitution, other U.S. laws, or their own individual liberties. They believe that the Constitution grants citizens the power to take back the federal government by force or violence if they feel it’s necessary. They oppose gun control efforts and fear the widespread disarming of Americans by the federal government."

        http://web.archive.org/web/20120915111407/http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2011/september/militia_092211

        1. JFree   2 years ago

          I saw something very similar on an FBI or Homeland Security domestic terrorism report in about 2007/2008. So there is nothing new from the Bush admin to the Obama admin. In fact, there was a kerfuffle about that older report because it specifically mentioned libertarian and the report was released during the RP 2008 election campaign. The conspiracy theorists who pervaded that campaign had a great time uncovering stuff.

        2. ThomasD   2 years ago

          They are only wrong insofar as they make a categorical error.

          The Consitution is not the foundational document of our nation. It is the organizational and operational document of our present govrrnment.

          The Declaration of Independence is our foundational document. One that plainly states it is the right of the people to "take back" the government when it exceeds its rightful boundaries.

          Present government flunkies and functionaries notwithstanding.

          1. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago (edited)

            The Constitution is the founding document because the Independence of the United States was not in doubt and because it is the supreme law of the land.

            The Declaration of Independence expressed the Founders’ ideals on Natural Rights, their grievances against King George III, and the resolve to break free of his rule, but The Declaration of Independence was not a legal document.

            If anything, it was an illegal document and every signatory if caught would have hung by the neck until dead had the Patriots not succeeded in throwing off the British Empire.

            Both the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence are admirable documents, but with different purposes.

        3. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

          They believe that the Constitution grants citizens the power to take back the federal government by force or violence if they feel it’s necessary.

          You/they are a traitor you dumb fuckstick.

          1. TJJ2000   2 years ago (edited)

            You -- Anyone who protects the definition of the USA (US Constitution) is a traitor to the UN-Constitutional [Na]tional So[zi]alist Empire conquering the USA from within...

            Funny how you Nazi-fanboys can't seem to understand UR the enemy in this nation.

          2. TJJ2000   2 years ago

            Why do you think the 2nd Amendment was written?

            1. CE   2 years ago

              Because they didn't have typewriters or computers yet?

              1. Gozer the Gozarian   2 years ago

                ^---- This.

          3. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   2 years ago

            No, as a Soros loving Marxist, YOU are the traitor. You’re also a pedophile.

            Kill yourself.

          4. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

            You/they are a traitor you dumb fuckstick.

            Any country controlled by your side deserves to be overthrown. You're not the counter-culture anymore.

      3. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   2 years ago

        You rape little boys, and jack off to videos of little boys being raped. You should be tortured to death.

  7. The Margrave of Azilia   2 years ago

    From a 1775 letter about the Don't Tread on Me rattlesnake. The letter is credited to Benjamin Franklin (who among his other achievements seems to have been the lyricist for Metallica):

    "I recollected that her eye excelled in brightness, that of any other animal, and that she has no eye-lids—She may therefore be esteemed an emblem of vigilance.—She never begins an attack, nor, when once engaged, ever surrenders: She is therefore an emblem of magnanimity and true courage."

    https://www.americanheritage.com/rattle-snake-symbol-america

    1. CE   2 years ago

      Didn't he want the turkey to be our national bird though?

      1. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

        That's a common myth. Really he didn't want the eagle, but never actually proposed the turkey. He just pointed out how the turkey was a nobler, braver bird than the eagle.

        1. ThomasD   2 years ago

          And, IIRC his aversion to the eagle had to do with it being a too common element in monarchical symbolism.

  8. Quo Usque Tandem   2 years ago

    “Let kids be their authentic selves and give them a world of information—students can figure out what's important to them."

    I liken this to allowing children to play, on a playground, absent a published list of no less than 103 rules and strict adherence thereto.

    Anything less is literally hating children because somebody might get hurt, or worse, offended.

  9. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

    "patriot" groups.

    Oh the horror people who are proud to be American. Can't have that. Must ban any symbol that creates pride in our country. Remind me again who are the seditious crowd here?

    1. Stuck in California   2 years ago

      Exactly.

      That has been the whole point behind morphing hard core racists like the KKK into "White Nationalists". A war of words to associate anyone who might believe in America First, for any reason, with the folks most reviled in the US. Propaganda 101.

      Alas, it works. At least for a goodly swath of the populace, like the teacher who unquestioningly calls a Revolutionary era symbol "Associated with slavery"

      1. CE   2 years ago

        If someone considers a group called the "Oath Keepers" to be dangerous radical far right extremists because they actually take their oaths of office and oaths of service to the Constitution seriously, it makes you wonder what that someone wants to do to us.

        1. Nardz   2 years ago

          Why would you wonder?
          They're pretty fucking obvious about it.

  10. Use the Schwartz   2 years ago

    "The reason that we do not want the flag displayed is due to its origins with slavery and the slave trade."

    Oh my, the Stars and Bars? Or haven't they gotten that brave yet?

    1. Stuck in California   2 years ago

      They're never brave. They only do that shit when they are in their echo chambers, and are aghast when they get confronted by anyone who rightly calls them fucking nuts.

      Half of modern politics is pretending to be offended. Poli-Sci classes probably spend a week on how to literally, and figuratively, do the "clutching my pearls" gesture.

    2. CE   2 years ago

      The Stars and Stripes have the same origins. But yeah, it is considered a right wing symbol, especially if the stars are in a circle, like the first flag of the USA.

    3. mad.casual   2 years ago (edited)

      For Round 2, the kid should juxtapose a “The 1619 Project is a lie.” patch next to The Stars and Bars on his backpack and, when they tell him they both have to come off, that they have to pick one. Either the Stars and Bars originated with slavery well after Independence or The Stars and Bars didn’t originate with slavery.

    4. Tyval Dayall   2 years ago

      Wear a Stars and Bars flag made with the rainbow colors and people's heads will explode.

      Seriously though, I am sure there are some idiots that think the Scottish flag is a confederate symbol just because it has a big X on it.

  11. ThomasD   2 years ago

    Even Polis knows this is a bridge too far.

    For now...

  12. TJJ2000   2 years ago

    One of the many ?blessings? of Commie-Education.

    USA Commie-Education and Socialist Security; who would-a-thunkit? Just to name a couple of literally hundreds.

    1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

      You're an idiot. You hate the Constitution and wish for a Confederate uprising to overthrow the USA.

      1. TJJ2000   2 years ago

        The southern Democrat Confederate uprising? Now, now; UR just dismantling into delusions now. Maybe its finally time to give up your socialist utopian dream take-over of the USA and become a USA patriot honoring the US Constitution above democracy and Individual Liberty and Justice for all. You can do it; you'll feel a lot better.

  13. CE   2 years ago

    The flag has "origins with slavery," except for the states that didn't allow slavery, and except for the fact that it was a protest against what was then considered tyrannical government, but which would now be considered a dangerously laissez-faire banana republic with irresponsible levels of austerity, and lacking in even the most common sense regulations.

    1. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

      Considering the British Crown were some of the largest slave trader financers at the time, the Garden flag could if you squint enough actually be anti-slavery.

    2. Liberty Lover   2 years ago (edited)

      The New Socialist Liberal Bill of Rights:
      1. Conform or pay the price!

  14. AT   2 years ago

    OK, so the problem everyone should have here is with how grossly misinformed our so-called "educators" (to say nothing of our politicians) are. They don't actually know the origins or intended purpose of these things they talk about.

    > "I oppose banning the Gadsden flag in schools for the same reason I oppose conservative schools districts that ban LGBTQ flags in schools," wrote Lieu.

    Which tells us he doesn't understand either.

    The Gadsden flag has nothing to do with slaves or slavery. The LGBTP flag is flat out hate speech and an open, contemptuous display of intolerance. And yet, somehow the Gadsden one is the one that's problematic, and the LGBTP one is accepted?

    Are we sure this is about the flags and their meaning, and not about the partisan interests backing each of them respectively? Anyone? Bueller?

    1. Jerry B.   2 years ago

      I remember in Science class in the 60s when the teacher said airplanes fly because the front of the wing is higher than the back. I tried to tell him about the Bernoulli's Principle. It didn't work.

    2. MWAocdoc   2 years ago

      Gadsden himself owned a large number of slaves in South Carolina and directly or indirectly imported African slaves. Although the flag has nothing whatever to do with slavery or white supremacy, Gadsden himself did. No libertarian could ever excuse slavery and still claim to be a libertarian. History is what it is, although new facts and evaluations can alter interpretations and conclusions concerning it in retrospect. Trying to spin history doesn't help anyone's position in the culture wars ... it just discredits their effort.

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

        Gadsden himself owned a large number of slaves in South Carolina and directly or indirectly imported African slaves.

        Which has shit-all to do with the teacher's stupid claims. It's just a lazy guilt-by-association argument, sort of like marxists arguing that the US is evil because it once had slavery and still doesn't guarantee 100 percent equal outcomes for every single person.

  15. Spencer O'Neill   2 years ago (edited)

    Working part-time, I bring in more than $27,000 USD per month. I listened to a variety of people explain to me how much money they would reasonably expect to make online, so it’s still difficult to determine. It did become genuine, and it completely db40 altered my life. Everyone should now just try this line of work.

    By using this website—————>>> https://www.dailypay7.com/

  16. Guardian253   2 years ago

    Of course, "libertarian" folks will let school administrators off the hook for their actions. It seems school boards and administrators violate parents, students, and the public's rights on nearly a daily basis, but the libertarian movement is once again silent, like they were during the covid pandemic.

    1. Gozer the Gozarian   2 years ago

      Eat a dick, troll.

    2. R Mac   2 years ago

      If you think libertarians were silent you’ve been listening to the wrong libertarians.

      And FYi Reason is not a good voice for libertarianism.

    3. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

      You don't get out much do you?

  17. Jerry B.   2 years ago

    And Babylon Bee, as usual, is right on it,

    https://babylonbee.com/news/kid-suspended-for-being-in-possession-of-history-book-with-us-flag-on-cover

    1. MWAocdoc   2 years ago

      Bingo!

  18. Brandybuck   2 years ago

    It's shit like this why we need more Gadsen Flags.

    Although I do admit the Gadsen flag has been appropriated by way too many people and has become essentially meaningless. And even adopted ironically by states rights movements. Still this is going to backfire on the haters so much that I've placed an order for moar popcorn.

  19. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

    The Libertarian version with the porcupine in the center and the motto "Don't Tread On Anyone" has a touch of modernity and universality. Only functionally illiterate public officials--but I repeat myself--could misunderstand it.

  20. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 years ago

    "On Monday, school officials removed Jaiden from class due to his Gadsden flag patch."

    Ironic, don't ya think?

  21. MWAocdoc   2 years ago (edited)

    There is no downside to such attacks for culture warriors seeking to exhaust the targets of their ideological umbrage. No one will ever be punished for violating the First Amendment rights of students in their schools; and no one will ever be punished for causing someone to lose their jobs or their positions by mobbing them for political incorrectness. They are free to attack people and violate their Constitutional rights repeatedly and compensate their victims using taxpayer money at no personal cost no matter how many times they are rebuked or reversed by the courts.

  22. Truthteller1   2 years ago

    The administration and teacher pool is now completely under the control of uncurious, indoctrinated and poorly educated millennials.

  23. Roberta   2 years ago

    And the Nazis appropriated swastikas, and the homosexuals appropriated gayness. But try using those for their more general meaning now, huh?

    1. The Margrave of Azilia   2 years ago

      And Internet commenters appropriated Nazis.

    2. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

      The swastika was stupid and superstitious and thus rationally evil even before it was a symbol of genocide and tyranny, simply because the swastika was a symbol believed to bring good luck.

      And goodness knows, Heterosexuals burning Homosexuals at the stake with bundles of sticks (called "faggots") were not exactly a gleeful bunch, so the Heterosexuals kind of abandoned gayness some time ago. Homosexuals were just exercising squatter's rights, so to speak.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

'Banal Horror': Asylum Case Deals Trump Yet Another Loss on Due Process

Billy Binion | 5.29.2025 5:27 PM

Supreme Court Unanimously Agrees To Curb Environmental Red Tape That Slows Down Construction Projects

Jeff Luse | 5.29.2025 3:31 PM

What To Expect Now That Trump Has Scrapped Biden's Crippling AI Regulations

Jack Nicastro | 5.29.2025 3:16 PM

Original Sin, the Biden Cover-Up Book, Is Better Late Than Never

Robby Soave | 5.29.2025 2:23 PM

Did 'Activist Judges' Derail Trump's Tariffs?

Eric Boehm | 5.29.2025 2:05 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!