Janet Yellen Accidentally Ate Chinese Magic Mushrooms but Swears She Didn't Get High
"I can tell you none of us were affected by the mushrooms," Yellen insisted to CNN.

America's chief macroeconomist accidentally microdosed on Chinese "magic mushrooms" last month. Well, sort of.
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen accidentally dined on hallucinogenic mushrooms on a recent diplomatic trip to China. However, she swears she didn't actually get high from the dish.
"There was a delicious mushroom dish. I was not aware that these mushrooms had hallucinogenic properties," Yellen told CNN's Erin Burnett. "I learned that later."
"I can tell you none of us were affected by the mushrooms," Yellen added. "I read that if the mushrooms were cooked properly, which I'm sure they were at this very good restaurant, that they have no impact. But all of us enjoyed the mushrooms…and none of us felt any ill effects."
The mushrooms, according to The Washington Post, are typically foraged by locals in the Yunnan province and prised for their "umami-laden and porcini-like" flavor, not their hallucinogenic properties.
"There's a difference in cultural attitude about the psychoactive effect — it's like the food itself is more important than this property," Colin Domnauer, a Ph.D. candidate who studies the mushrooms, told the Post.
A fascinating part about these specific mushrooms—whose name translates to "see hand blue"—is that scientists are yet to figure out what exact compound causes hallucinations in those who eat the undercooked fungi, leading to possibly untapped uses for medicine and psychotherapy.
According to the Post, publicity over Yellen's brush with the supposedly harmless mushrooms has led the dish to sell out in China, where the shrooms are served at multiple locations of a restaurant called "In and Out" (which, alas, is not related to the West-coast burger chain.)
This latest incident provides an amusing tale about the weirder sides of diplomacy—and perhaps distracts from Yellen's disastrous handling of the national debt. But if Yellen had ended up going on an unwanted trip, Reason thankfully has a nifty guide on how to take shrooms, and what to do if you end up taking a bit too much.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Bill Clinton, 1992: "I didn't inhale and I didn't try it again."
Janet Yellen, 2023: "I tried them, but unlike Afroman, I didn't get high."
Maybe lizard people are immune.
She looks more like the bird from the "O Rly" meme
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,000 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
Leave Laursen out of this.
LEAVE BRITTNEY ALONE!!
I get paid over $220 per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I would be able to do it but my best friend earns over $35k a month doing this and she convinced me to try.For Details
.
.
For Details►————————————————————➤ https://Www.Coins71.Com
Barack Obama, "I got high daily, but only in my mind"?
He also fucked dudes, but only in his mind.
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning sixteen thousand US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome7.com
And Boris Johnson snorted some coke, but didn't inhale. Or maybe it was sugar.
Dang, I thought we finally had a reasonable explanation for her fiscal policies.
Too bad they weren't highly poisonous.
I doubt we will see this in the roundup tomorrow, or anywhere on Reason:
https://slaynews.com/news/leaked-photos-jan-6-prisoner-tortured-held-horrific-conditions-months/
“Local story “
A quick google of the author Frank Bergman said most of his articles are full of fallacious reasoning and/or based upon things that are factually untrue.
He'd fit in great with the commentariat.
So no concern for political prisoners being mistreated, held for extended periods without charges, or forced to sign loyalty oaths and give up their freedom of speech then?
Sarc is a sociopath.
I'm saying I don't necessarily trust the source.
Youre saying your first instict as “a libertarian” is to distrust state abuse of a J6 arrested despite numerous documented abuses because you have been defending the shit for 3 years.
Likewise the source is Jim Hoft who is linked in the second fucking paragraph since you didnt read the story.
Sorry. 6th paragraph.
Look at sarc learning what ad hominem actually means. Good for you little buddy.
Um, no. It’s not an ad hominem to not trust someone because they have a reputation for being untrustworthy. An ad hominem is when you say someone is wrong about trucks because they don’t like grilled cheese sandwiches. Or when you say they’re wrong because you accuse them of being a hypocrite (tu quoque, the commentariat’s favorite fallacy).
Again. Your first instict was to dismiss fucking photos despite a long 3 years of documented abuses. Because you're a piece of shit.
I would piss on Sarc if he was on fire.
But only on his head, and that only to make sure his cognitive centers lasted longer for the full experience. Plus, y'know, pissing in his face while the rest of his body burned.
I think sarc wants you to piss on him.
Welp, I was wrong. You still don't know what an ad hominen is:
marked by or being an attack on an opponent's character rather than by an answer to the contentions made
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ad%20hominem
It literally means to attack someone based on their reputation and not their argument. Anybody want to start a counter on how long before drunken sarc forgets?
5 bucks on now.
If Sarc ever bothered to read it in the first place. He might be too plastered by now to notice.
Sarc may have been making an ad hominem argument technically, but his point was just that he didn’t believe the story or trust the source, which is directly relevant to the argument. Skepticism of any source is good instinct, and it may be the most common argument used here. Compare this to ad hominems attacks irrelevant to the argument like references to a commenter's supposed alcoholism.
Calling sarc an alcoholic is an insult. His argument is not being dismissed for being an alcoholic. You made the same mistake sarc does.
Yes. I take your point. You are correct. I was wrong. An insult is not an ad hominem, it is something even more pointless having nothing to do with the argument at all.
Tell you what. Find a trustworthy source that will corroborate this dude's piece and I'll change my tune.
Man. This is one great bookmark for the next time you claim to be a libertarian.
Then again when MSNBC and dems were pushing trump russia you fully supported it no question.
When government said they weren't censoring anyone, defended it no question.
When CDC said vaccines and maks worked no question, even when given studies.
Great work buddy. Couldn't ask for a better bookmark.
You are not the arbiter (another word you will need to look up) of trustworthyness. Though based on your post about homosex, you might be a_biter.
So no concern for political prisoners being mistreated, held for extended periods without charges, or forced to sign loyalty oaths and give up their freedom of speech then?
That shouldn't happen to anyone. I don't put the J6 yahoos on a pedestal.
How long before the booze finally ends your worthless life?
Looks like some piece of shit is realizing how bad his responses look.
What pedestal? Not treating prisoners like this? Thats your pedestal? You freely rant in every other article about abuses. Yet you restrain yourself for J6.
Remember when people being picked up away from riots was beyond the pale to him? But this is apparently fine.
They used unmarked vans. A total violation and worst abuse in the history of the country.
Yeah sure. That's exactly what I meant when I said it shouldn't happen to anyone.
The stupid, it burns!
When did you ever refer to antifa as “yahoos” , you miserable liar?
No, just no concern for obvious bullshit. We're heartless that way.
The pictures were AI generated yells sarc. Bookmarked you piece of shit.
This is what the fake ass libertarians like Mike, sarc. And Jeff defend.
They should apply for jobs here.
Isn't CA requiring pig farmers to give your future breakfast more space than that?
As can be seen:
https://www.asiaone.com/sites/default/files/inline/images/14664_1476507127.jpg
See Hand Blue mushrooms can be as blue as the hair of Biden's older cabinet members.
Or the younger ones.
Her being on 'shrooms would actually explain a lot.
Ok, I'm about to be "that guy", so to be "that guy", THIS is what gets Janet Yellen talked about in these pages?
It's weird how "that guy" simultaneously feels like the only adult in the room *and* the least likely to be a gossiping old maid, 12 yr. old girl, or 14 yr. old boy:
[Makes "roll your window down gesture" at "that guy"]
Pardon me, but the adults in the room are tittering over a rumor that Old Lady Yellen may've accidentally ingested!
It's all very far out and groovy... very Hunter S Thompson-this-or-that-public-official-is-totes-on-mescaline-man but I just can't help but wonder if there's something else Yellen might be involved in that could intersect, even on the outskirts, of libertarian interest.
"There's a difference in cultural attitude about the psychoactive effect — it's like the food itself is more important than this property," Colin Domnauer, a Ph.D. candidate who studies the mushrooms, told the Post.
Well we all know what the Chinese Government's attitude is to people using or peddling drugs, so that's probably the only way they can look at them.
What are the odds that this guy ever finishes his PhD? Or that he still cares when he does?
What about their attitude towards raw bat?
Or pangolin cock. Or raccoon dog meat.
This would explain a lot, actually.
"Inflation is gonna be so transitory, man.... the numbers are just going to float down, like this TV if I drop it off this building...."
It might, but Yellen's idiocy long predates her consumption of Chinese magic mushrooms.
I think incompetence, affirmative action, and senility are better explanations of her conduct and performance.
No man, she like took shrooms and we want to know about her trip... don't be a square, daddy-o.
...
She probably also can't get drunk off alcohol, because she is already drunk.
Given the magical thinking Yellen does every day, how the fuck would she know if the shrooms had any affect?
That might be the explanation for her op-ed piece in yesterday's Wall Street Journal. The title was so bizarre I wasn't sure if it was farce or sarcasm; after I read the piece, I was even more unsure.
Does she actually believe the crap she preaches?
Maybe it was the mushrooms.....
A lot of things are bad for you if you eat them raw...
"I can tell you none of us were affected by the mushrooms," Yellen added.
"Ma'am, this is a Wendy's."
Heh. Janet and Brandon go to White Castle.
Also: she didn't inhale; and she didn't have sex with that woman.
Odd that Emma writes perhaps distracts from Yellen's disastrous handling of the national debt while linking to an article which does not claim of any "disastrous handling", and nor would such a claim be true. It's almost as if she doesn't understand what a treasury secretary does.
Sadly, that article is probably all they have referencing her here. But now they have a shrooms article, too, so they’re starting to roll.
A Treasury Secretary mostly weeps. Geithner had to mitigate the results of the G Waffen Bush asset-forfeiture crashing of all mortgage-backed derivatives when grow houses and bank accounts were confiscated wholesale because plant leaves. He probably understood what was happening, but being honest about politicians wrecking the economy isn't in the job description. Asset forfeiture graphs peak at the FY 2007-2008 timelines. Bear in mind that fiscal year 2007 began in October 2007... Republicans lie about responsiblity for the Crashes of 1907, 1920, 1929, 1931, 1973, 1987, 2008, 2010 and 2015, but one expects that from looters.
Start making more money weekly... This is valuable part-time work for everyone... The best part ,work from the comfort of your house and get paid from $10k-$20k each week ... Start today and have your first cash at the end of this week...
HERE →→ https://www.dailypay7.com/
I believe that, as in any other game, the sensation of receiving a reward is what makes people devoted to video games. There are not many opportunities to be rewarded in the actual world. It is essentially the reason for playing a game. Everyone desires to be the last person standing in lol beans. I must state that it is extremely rewarding to be the last person standing. However, what the majority of players do not realize is that the majority of their opponents are proxies.
Looter Kleptocracy politicians do realize that most of their opponents are non-voters because they do not grasp the law-changing clout of libertarian spoiler votes. Conservatism means keping the suckers in the dark, whatever it takes. The last Republican to win the popular vote needed help from fellow mystics Bin Ladin and Hussein to garner the necessary hatred.
Blue brushing on a mushroom can indicate psilocybin in some cases.
https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/mystery-of-why-magic-mushrooms-go-blue-solved/4010870.article
Know your shrooms for excellent zooms.
Slow news day? Run out of DeSantis and Trump bash material?
"See stem turn blue when handled" might be a passable translation, and beheading a typical Chinese outcome for the cooks were it true. I believe this story as much as I believe Clinton "did not inhale" and "did not have sex with that woman." On dosage, a cereal bowl heaped high with cubensis mushrooms is WAY too much. But a single shroom is not much stronger than a can of Thud Blight.
She is so far off the wall she would never know if she were high on shrooms.
Given her policy positions I had assumed she had been taking hallucinogens her whole life.
https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
Even if the use was overseas i would think that makes Yellen an unlawful user of a controlled substance.
I hope she has surrendered any firearms she owns.
One law for some, another for the others.
Given that Yellen is a biden dementiacrat, she's hallucinating 100% of the time anyway.