AOC Slams the FDA's Harmful Overregulation of Sunscreen
On this one issue, the democratic socialist sounds a lot like a libertarian.

Credit where credit is due: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D–N.Y.) may be a self-described democratic socialist, but when it comes to the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) overregulation of sunscreen—a nontrivial issue—she sounds a lot like a libertarian.
In a recent TikTok video, AOC interviewed esthetician Charlotte Palermino about the abysmally limited sunscreen options in the United States.
"U.S. sunscreen regulations are not necessarily making us more safe," explains Palermino. And AOC agrees:
US sunscreens are far behind the rest of the world and our regulations aren't necessarily making our sunscreens better or safer — but it doesn't have to be this way! pic.twitter.com/vaZXpZ2a7S
— Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@RepAOC) August 11, 2023
AOC is calling out a very real problem. Sunscreen is regulated like a drug, which means the product is subject to byzantine FDA regulations that have largely thwarted innovation in the category for the last 20 years.
As the economist Alex Tabarrok has pointed out, European and Asian countries enjoy vastly superior options.
"Suncreens in Europe and Asia are better than in the United States because more ingredients are allowed and these create more effective and more pleasing suncreens," he writes.
This is no accident, but rather the deliberate result of regulatory policy. The European Union, for instance, has approved 27 different compounds for use in sunscreen, whereas the FDA has only approved 17.
"The number of approved ingredients matters because not all filters can seamlessly be formulated into sunscreens or other suitable products for skin application," writes the Cato Institute's Gabriella Beaumont-Smith. "Moreover, some of the ingredients approved in the EU and Japan but not the US are more effective and long‐lasting."
If the FDA won't clear more sunscreen ingredients for use in the U.S., the agency should at the very least allow reciprocity: Foreign sunscreens could be made available with warning labels noting that they were approved by European health officials but not by the FDA. Of course, the best option would be for U.S. regulators to simply get out of the way and acknowledge that these products are obviously safe for human use. Indeed, not approving them is the greater danger, since using sunscreen is one of the best ways to prevent skin cancer.
In her TikTok video, AOC encourages her supporters to confront their members of Congress on this issue. Ideally, she would pursue the argument she's making here to its logical end and endorse very broad regulatory reform. After all, FDA inaction is depriving Americans of much more than just sunscreen: Regulatory hurdles are partly responsible for everything from the baby formula shortage to the high price of insulin.
Nevertheless, it's good that even though AOC was feeling the Bern, she apparently doesn't want to get burned.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning sixteen thousand US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply.
Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome7.com
Matt Gaetz takes American General to task for engineering coups in third world countries. On this issue, Republican sounds like old-timey libertarian on foreign entanglements.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
Sunscreen is white supremacy.
In other FDA news.
Doctors Can Prescribe Ivermectin for COVID-19
"FDA explicitly recognizes that doctors do have the authority to prescribe ivermectin to treat COVID," Ashley Cheung Honold, a Department of Justice lawyer representing the FDA, said during oral arguments on Aug. 8 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit."
So sorry that this is happening to you right now JFree, Mike, Sarc...
Thoughts and prayers.
Have you been following the continuing Sam Harrisification of Sam Harris?
According to his most recent Meditations, he laments that COVID didn't really "get our attention" as it wasn't deadly enough-- and had it been more deadly, we wouldn't be asking questions about origin, vaccine effectiveness or vaccine safety. The only reason we're even asking these questions is because COVID passed us by largely unnoticed.
"There is no mountain of bodies high enough that I can't fail to learn a lesson from."
I don't normally wish someone an agonizing death of hemorrhagic fever, but when I do, it's because they're quite literally begging for it.
Seems like Sam found religion after all.
Sanjay Gupta of CNN hardest hit (preferably by one of Joe Rogan's spinning back kicks).
I've found that black shoe polish smeared all over your body makes a wonderful sunscreen.
Is that you Trudeau?
God forbid that someone, sometime will develop cancer or chronic dysphoria syndrome and someone somewhere will discover that she used a European sunscreen not approved by the FDA and then the class action lawsuits will start, including everyone who ever used a European sunscreen and developed cancer, chronic dysphoria or mange. Then there will be Congressional hearings followed by the President banning foreign sunscreen ingredients and travel from sunscreen countries.
First thanks to AOC and Reason for bringing this matter to our attention. I use sunscreen frequently and was not aware that there were better options. Also, it is worth noting that people are complex and cannot be fitted into silos. I suspect that Reason might find more libertarian tendencies in AOC if they looked. Don't expect to find as many as Nick Gillespie has, but I suspect that Nick and AOC enjoy a few common ideas.
Nick is an unrepentant COVID fascist, so you're probably right.
Sounds like it's Nick's stopped-clock moment as well as AOC's. Maybe they should date each other.
She ain’t looking so good no more.
Did she ever?
The European Union, for instance, has approved 27 different compounds for use in sunscreen, whereas the FDA has only approved 17.
Oh okay. So the difference is that they have a better regulatory body, not that they've bypassed a regulatory body.
No, it's that they have a looser regulatory body in this instance. They were alright with flipper kids after all.
We don't need 27 sunscreens. /bernie
Yeah... It seems to me she just wants sunscreen to be regulated differently, not necessarily less.
^
AOC opposes regulation? Where am I? Which way is up? What color is the sky?
But trust me on the sunscreen.
Nope. She wants more, not less.
I think Robby doesn't read his own stuff.
Which is grounds for promotion at Reason.
Where do you see a call for more regulation in that?
Gonna need to see her topless before I can weigh in on this
Robby, you do realize she is calling for MORE regulation, right?
Uh, no, she isn't. She's calling for looser regulation of sunscreen.
Not according to that video. She agrees with the esthetician that sunscreen be regulated as a cosmetic, which is less stringent than drug regulation. So she’s calling for less regulation of sunscreen.
However, she also agrees with the esthetician’s call for government funding of R & D for sunscreens. So a mixed bag, but better than no bag at all.
A libertarian opposes the existence of the FDA.
AOC likes the FDA, she just wants it to be more progressive and more in line with European regulators.
That doesn't make AOC a libertarian, it makes her a transnational socialist, which she actually is.
Thereby illustrating that there is little difference between some self-proclaimed "libertarians" and socialists. We also see that when it comes to open borders, tariff-free trade with socialist nations, drugs, and sex.
But I'd rather have "libertarians" than socialists.
Everyone is libertarian to some degree or other — even the most ardent socialist. None of them would abolish every single possible choice.
Socialism is about maximizing choice. Libertarianism is not.
See, you outed yourself as a fake libertarian and actual socialist.
Well Said, "A libertarian opposes the existence of the" UN-Constitutional "FDA."
So typical of the "libertarian" Reason folks. Fighting some small regulation is so important to them and finding a bolsheik on their said immediately makes said bolshie a hero to Robbie and gang. Forget Fauci, the Fed, the attack on the Bill of Rights everyday by Biden's gang and even their hero..the failed hedge fund gay Gov of Colorado banning adults from buying a gun. But AOC...what a defender of liberty. JC...Reason how low can you go?
It's important to drive wedges into the bolshies. I agree with the Reason folks on that tactic. Encourage every deviation, no matter how slight, from the totalitarian. Get some competition going for our favor.
So I think it's great to be able to say, "Even AOC thinks...." I mean, if a radical libertarian thinks something's a good thing, what's the big deal, that's a given. But when even a Tamerlane or a Macias or a Stalin thinks it's good, that's news!
There is no "tactic" here.
Leftists and libertarians both agree on reducing government limits on many personal, individual choices.
But removing such choices is only libertarian if you also force individuals to assume the risks and costs of the consequences of those choices. Leftists still socialize those costs.
When "libertarians" join leftists in repealing government limits on personal choices, they aren't pursuing libertarian policies, they are just being useful idiots.
Where do you see in this any call to foist the costs of decisions to buy a certain sunscreen onto other persons?
The European approval process for sunscreens is less strict, so there is a higher risk of unexpected side effects. The medical costs of dealing with such side effects are socialized in the US.
Encouraging injury through dangerous drugs or medical procedures and socializing the resulting costs at this point is standard operating procedure for progressives, to the point that it must be viewed as a cynical political strategy. That is, progressives have an incentive to make Americans sick because it increases the need for government social programs and healthcare, giving them more power.
Of course, in the case of sunscreens, given Europe’s experience, the additional risk is likely small. But what also drives AOC, however, is a knee-jerk preference for any of the authoritarian/progressive/socialist policies popular in Europe.
In any case, “have the FDA approve sunscreens because they are approved in Europe” is not a libertarian position.
Letting a voluntary action (including transactions) take place rather than forbidding it is a libertarian position. FDA’s “approval” of sunscreens (actually not an approval of the products themselves but permission to market them in interstate commerce) under that condition (as opposed to not allowing it) is more libertarian than not.
Your hypothesis about European agencies socializing costs of behavior w.r.t. sunscreen is either incomprehensible or bizarre, I can't tell which.
Trashing your neighbors home is a "voluntary action", but not libertarian. Colluding with another party to defraud a third party is a voluntary transaction between two parties without being libertarian.
Whether an action is libertarian or not depends not just on whether the persons performing the action are doing so voluntarily, but also whether the actions impose costs on others.
I stated no such hypothesis.
I stated the fact that in the US the cost of iatrogenic damage due to harmful drugs is socialized by the government. Therefore, in the US, drugs are approved by the government.
In a libertarian society, the cost of iatrogenic damage would be born by private actors and those private actors would tell you what drugs you can and cannot use. E.g., your private health insurance carrier would drop you if you started taking drugs that they did not approve.
Libertarianism doesn't mean maximizing choice, it means merely that your choices are constrained by private actors, not by government.
Seems like all the drug manufacturers who pay billions out in lawsuits would like to know how to get into some of that government socialization of costs.
Not that there isn't some socialization of the dangers of bad drugs, but to say that private parties (drug companies) are not on the hook is disingenuous.
Those billions largely go to lawyers, and they are the exception, not the rule.
And where did I say that???
I'm pretty sure AOC's "great awakening" here is just an example of the old adage about even a blind nut finding a squirrel every once in a while.
I'm afraid sunscreen isn't enough to get my hopes up that AOC isn't a treasonous [Na]tional So[zi]alist still. Call me when she finds out there isn't any federal authority by the very definition of the USA and the people's law over their government for an FDA.
Hey, if she needs someone to apply sunscreen to her back...
You are going to let her front burn? You monster.
Start now earning cash every month online from home. Getting paid more than $15k by doing an easy job online. I have made $19715 in last 4 weeks from this job. Easy to join and earning from this are just awesome. Join this right now by follow instructions here....
Open This Website............>> https://www.dailypay7.com/
The FDA is obsolete. Blow it up and start over.
Everyone seems to want a "non political" solution from political agencies. You can't ever square that circle. The best outcomes would come when agencies like the FDA are eliminated altogether and let the market produce these products. Tort and contract law could easily accommodate any issues of negligence or malfeasance on the part of market participants.
https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
Sure, that'd be the best conceivable outcome. But how about among the choices that are actually before us? Why bother even discussing an ideal that never changes (Why should it?) but has no intersection with the world, while pretending to discuss current events?
If we didn't do that, these comment boards would be nearly empty.
Because that 'ideal' is the only way to save the USA from it's rail into socialist despair.
If it is the best conceivable outcome then we need to make it one of the choices before us. It is past time to make the best argument and make it stick. Cheers!
"she sounds a lot like a libertarian"
Robby, she's not that cute and I'll bet she's not worth a damn in the sack.
Seriously, no one is a libertarian whose primary problem is being worried about sunscreen.
Sunscreen is just one example of an issue.
Plus, one good rule of thumb is "Don't stick it in crazy."
Broken clock
What is with all the weird vogueing? Or is that hand modeling?
Is that some kind of in-joke? Or is this their style... Look, I Pretty!??!
It is really odd for a political leader, that's for sure. If there were some sort of weekly comedy satire skit show, surely they would mock this performance.....
"a nontrivial issue"
Wow, where is the door to your world? I want to live in a world where sunscreen flavors are a "nontrivial issue." Must be nice to have all the real problems solved.
Hey now….. Don’t get too excited, for even a stopped clock is correct twice a day.
And BTW, I do doubt AOC could even spell 'Libertarian' without a teleprompter.
Boston University's Finest...!!! They're seen as the short-bus VoTech college of the Boston area, thanks to her.....