Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Regulation

AOC Slams the FDA's Harmful Overregulation of Sunscreen

On this one issue, the democratic socialist sounds a lot like a libertarian.

Robby Soave | 8.11.2023 4:28 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
AOC against the FDA | Anthony Behar/Sipa USA/Newscom
AOC against the FDA (Anthony Behar/Sipa USA/Newscom)

Credit where credit is due: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D–N.Y.) may be a self-described democratic socialist, but when it comes to the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) overregulation of sunscreen—a nontrivial issue—she sounds a lot like a libertarian.

In a recent TikTok video, AOC interviewed esthetician Charlotte Palermino about the abysmally limited sunscreen options in the United States.

"U.S. sunscreen regulations are not necessarily making us more safe," explains Palermino. And AOC agrees:

US sunscreens are far behind the rest of the world and our regulations aren't necessarily making our sunscreens better or safer — but it doesn't have to be this way! pic.twitter.com/vaZXpZ2a7S

— Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@RepAOC) August 11, 2023

AOC is calling out a very real problem. Sunscreen is regulated like a drug, which means the product is subject to byzantine FDA regulations that have largely thwarted innovation in the category for the last 20 years.

As the economist Alex Tabarrok has pointed out, European and Asian countries enjoy vastly superior options.

"Suncreens in Europe and Asia are better than in the United States because more ingredients are allowed and these create more effective and more pleasing suncreens," he writes.

This is no accident, but rather the deliberate result of regulatory policy. The European Union, for instance, has approved 27 different compounds for use in sunscreen, whereas the FDA has only approved 17.

"The number of approved ingredients matters because not all filters can seamlessly be formulated into sunscreens or other suitable products for skin application," writes the Cato Institute's Gabriella Beaumont-Smith. "Moreover, some of the ingredients approved in the EU and Japan but not the US are more effective and long‐​lasting."

If the FDA won't clear more sunscreen ingredients for use in the U.S., the agency should at the very least allow reciprocity: Foreign sunscreens could be made available with warning labels noting that they were approved by European health officials but not by the FDA. Of course, the best option would be for U.S. regulators to simply get out of the way and acknowledge that these products are obviously safe for human use. Indeed, not approving them is the greater danger, since using sunscreen is one of the best ways to prevent skin cancer.

In her TikTok video, AOC encourages her supporters to confront their members of Congress on this issue. Ideally, she would pursue the argument she's making here to its logical end and endorse very broad regulatory reform. After all, FDA inaction is depriving Americans of much more than just sunscreen: Regulatory hurdles are partly responsible for everything from the baby formula shortage to the high price of insulin.

Nevertheless, it's good that even though AOC was feeling the Bern, she apparently doesn't want to get burned.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Hunter Biden and Donald Trump Should Both Have Jury Trials

Robby Soave is a senior editor at Reason.

RegulationDeregulationAlexandria Ocasio-CortezFDAHealthPolicyFederal government
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (59)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Olivahunter   2 years ago (edited)

    I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning sixteen thousand US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply.
    Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome7.com

  2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

    Matt Gaetz takes American General to task for engineering coups in third world countries. On this issue, Republican sounds like old-timey libertarian on foreign entanglements.

    1. AngliaJames17   2 years ago (edited)

      Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
      .
      .
      Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com

  3. Vernon Depner   2 years ago

    Sunscreen is white supremacy.

  4. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

    In other FDA news.

    Doctors Can Prescribe Ivermectin for COVID-19

    "FDA explicitly recognizes that doctors do have the authority to prescribe ivermectin to treat COVID," Ashley Cheung Honold, a Department of Justice lawyer representing the FDA, said during oral arguments on Aug. 8 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit."

    So sorry that this is happening to you right now JFree, Mike, Sarc...
    Thoughts and prayers.

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

      Have you been following the continuing Sam Harrisification of Sam Harris?

      According to his most recent Meditations, he laments that COVID didn't really "get our attention" as it wasn't deadly enough-- and had it been more deadly, we wouldn't be asking questions about origin, vaccine effectiveness or vaccine safety. The only reason we're even asking these questions is because COVID passed us by largely unnoticed.

      1. mad.casual   2 years ago

        "There is no mountain of bodies high enough that I can't fail to learn a lesson from."

        I don't normally wish someone an agonizing death of hemorrhagic fever, but when I do, it's because they're quite literally begging for it.

      2. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        Seems like Sam found religion after all.

    2. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

      Sanjay Gupta of CNN hardest hit (preferably by one of Joe Rogan's spinning back kicks).

  5. Jerryskids   2 years ago

    I've found that black shoe polish smeared all over your body makes a wonderful sunscreen.

    1. Social Justice is neither   2 years ago

      Is that you Trudeau?

  6. MWAocdoc   2 years ago

    God forbid that someone, sometime will develop cancer or chronic dysphoria syndrome and someone somewhere will discover that she used a European sunscreen not approved by the FDA and then the class action lawsuits will start, including everyone who ever used a European sunscreen and developed cancer, chronic dysphoria or mange. Then there will be Congressional hearings followed by the President banning foreign sunscreen ingredients and travel from sunscreen countries.

  7. Moderation4ever   2 years ago

    First thanks to AOC and Reason for bringing this matter to our attention. I use sunscreen frequently and was not aware that there were better options. Also, it is worth noting that people are complex and cannot be fitted into silos. I suspect that Reason might find more libertarian tendencies in AOC if they looked. Don't expect to find as many as Nick Gillespie has, but I suspect that Nick and AOC enjoy a few common ideas.

    1. Vernon Depner   2 years ago

      Nick is an unrepentant COVID fascist, so you're probably right.

      1. jdgalt1   2 years ago

        Sounds like it's Nick's stopped-clock moment as well as AOC's. Maybe they should date each other.

        1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 years ago

          She ain’t looking so good no more.

          Did she ever?

  8. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

    The European Union, for instance, has approved 27 different compounds for use in sunscreen, whereas the FDA has only approved 17.

    Oh okay. So the difference is that they have a better regulatory body, not that they've bypassed a regulatory body.

    1. Social Justice is neither   2 years ago

      No, it's that they have a looser regulatory body in this instance. They were alright with flipper kids after all.

    2. Vernon Depner   2 years ago

      We don't need 27 sunscreens. /bernie

  9. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

    Yeah... It seems to me she just wants sunscreen to be regulated differently, not necessarily less.

    1. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 years ago

      ^

  10. Unicorn Abattoir   2 years ago

    AOC opposes regulation? Where am I? Which way is up? What color is the sky?

    But trust me on the sunscreen.

    1. Longtobefree   2 years ago

      Nope. She wants more, not less.
      I think Robby doesn't read his own stuff.
      Which is grounds for promotion at Reason.

      1. Roberta   2 years ago

        Where do you see a call for more regulation in that?

  11. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 years ago

    Gonna need to see her topless before I can weigh in on this

  12. Longtobefree   2 years ago

    Robby, you do realize she is calling for MORE regulation, right?

    1. Bill Poser   2 years ago

      Uh, no, she isn't. She's calling for looser regulation of sunscreen.

    2. Roberta   2 years ago (edited)

      Not according to that video. She agrees with the esthetician that sunscreen be regulated as a cosmetic, which is less stringent than drug regulation. So she’s calling for less regulation of sunscreen.

      However, she also agrees with the esthetician’s call for government funding of R & D for sunscreens. So a mixed bag, but better than no bag at all.

  13. NOYB2   2 years ago

    A libertarian opposes the existence of the FDA.

    AOC likes the FDA, she just wants it to be more progressive and more in line with European regulators.

    That doesn't make AOC a libertarian, it makes her a transnational socialist, which she actually is.

    Thereby illustrating that there is little difference between some self-proclaimed "libertarians" and socialists. We also see that when it comes to open borders, tariff-free trade with socialist nations, drugs, and sex.

    1. Roberta   2 years ago

      But I'd rather have "libertarians" than socialists.

      Everyone is libertarian to some degree or other — even the most ardent socialist. None of them would abolish every single possible choice.

      1. NOYB2   2 years ago

        Socialism is about maximizing choice. Libertarianism is not.

        See, you outed yourself as a fake libertarian and actual socialist.

    2. TJJ2000   2 years ago

      Well Said, "A libertarian opposes the existence of the" UN-Constitutional "FDA."

  14. Bill Falcon   2 years ago

    So typical of the "libertarian" Reason folks. Fighting some small regulation is so important to them and finding a bolsheik on their said immediately makes said bolshie a hero to Robbie and gang. Forget Fauci, the Fed, the attack on the Bill of Rights everyday by Biden's gang and even their hero..the failed hedge fund gay Gov of Colorado banning adults from buying a gun. But AOC...what a defender of liberty. JC...Reason how low can you go?

    1. Roberta   2 years ago

      It's important to drive wedges into the bolshies. I agree with the Reason folks on that tactic. Encourage every deviation, no matter how slight, from the totalitarian. Get some competition going for our favor.

      So I think it's great to be able to say, "Even AOC thinks...." I mean, if a radical libertarian thinks something's a good thing, what's the big deal, that's a given. But when even a Tamerlane or a Macias or a Stalin thinks it's good, that's news!

      1. NOYB2   2 years ago

        It’s important to drive wedges into the bolshies. I agree with the Reason folks on that tactic.

        There is no "tactic" here.

        Leftists and libertarians both agree on reducing government limits on many personal, individual choices.

        But removing such choices is only libertarian if you also force individuals to assume the risks and costs of the consequences of those choices. Leftists still socialize those costs.

        When "libertarians" join leftists in repealing government limits on personal choices, they aren't pursuing libertarian policies, they are just being useful idiots.

        1. Roberta   2 years ago

          Where do you see in this any call to foist the costs of decisions to buy a certain sunscreen onto other persons?

          1. NOYB2   2 years ago (edited)

            The European approval process for sunscreens is less strict, so there is a higher risk of unexpected side effects. The medical costs of dealing with such side effects are socialized in the US.

            Encouraging injury through dangerous drugs or medical procedures and socializing the resulting costs at this point is standard operating procedure for progressives, to the point that it must be viewed as a cynical political strategy. That is, progressives have an incentive to make Americans sick because it increases the need for government social programs and healthcare, giving them more power.

            Of course, in the case of sunscreens, given Europe’s experience, the additional risk is likely small. But what also drives AOC, however, is a knee-jerk preference for any of the authoritarian/progressive/socialist policies popular in Europe.

            In any case, “have the FDA approve sunscreens because they are approved in Europe” is not a libertarian position.

            1. Roberta   2 years ago (edited)

              Letting a voluntary action (including transactions) take place rather than forbidding it is a libertarian position. FDA’s “approval” of sunscreens (actually not an approval of the products themselves but permission to market them in interstate commerce) under that condition (as opposed to not allowing it) is more libertarian than not.

              Your hypothesis about European agencies socializing costs of behavior w.r.t. sunscreen is either incomprehensible or bizarre, I can't tell which.

              1. NOYB2   2 years ago

                Letting a voluntary action (including transactions) take place rather than forbidding it is a libertarian position.

                Trashing your neighbors home is a "voluntary action", but not libertarian. Colluding with another party to defraud a third party is a voluntary transaction between two parties without being libertarian.

                Whether an action is libertarian or not depends not just on whether the persons performing the action are doing so voluntarily, but also whether the actions impose costs on others.

                Your hypothesis about European agencies socializing costs of behavior w.r.t. sunscreen is either incomprehensible or bizarre, I can’t tell which.

                I stated no such hypothesis.

                I stated the fact that in the US the cost of iatrogenic damage due to harmful drugs is socialized by the government. Therefore, in the US, drugs are approved by the government.

                In a libertarian society, the cost of iatrogenic damage would be born by private actors and those private actors would tell you what drugs you can and cannot use. E.g., your private health insurance carrier would drop you if you started taking drugs that they did not approve.

                Libertarianism doesn't mean maximizing choice, it means merely that your choices are constrained by private actors, not by government.

                1. Medulla Oblongata   2 years ago

                  Seems like all the drug manufacturers who pay billions out in lawsuits would like to know how to get into some of that government socialization of costs.

                  Not that there isn't some socialization of the dangers of bad drugs, but to say that private parties (drug companies) are not on the hook is disingenuous.

                  1. NOYB2   2 years ago

                    Seems like all the drug manufacturers who pay billions out in lawsuits would like to know how to get into some of that government socialization of costs.

                    Those billions largely go to lawyers, and they are the exception, not the rule.

                    but to say that private parties (drug companies) are not on the hook is disingenuous.

                    And where did I say that???

  15. Jerryskids   2 years ago

    I'm pretty sure AOC's "great awakening" here is just an example of the old adage about even a blind nut finding a squirrel every once in a while.

  16. TJJ2000   2 years ago

    I'm afraid sunscreen isn't enough to get my hopes up that AOC isn't a treasonous [Na]tional So[zi]alist still. Call me when she finds out there isn't any federal authority by the very definition of the USA and the people's law over their government for an FDA.

  17. CE   2 years ago

    Hey, if she needs someone to apply sunscreen to her back...

    1. Eeyore   2 years ago

      You are going to let her front burn? You monster.

  18. LaylaAustral   2 years ago (edited)

    S­t­a­r­t n­o­w e­a­r­n­i­n­g c­a­s­h e­v­e­r­y m­o­n­t­h o­n­l­i­n­e f­r­o­m h­o­m­e­. G­e­t­t­i­n­g p­a­i­d m­o­r­e t­h­a­n $­1­5­k b­y d­o­i­n­g a­n e­a­s­y j­o­b o­n­l­i­n­e­. ­I h­a­v­e m­a­d­e $­1­9­7­1­5 i­n l­a­s­t ­4 w­e­e­k­s f­r­o­m t­h­i­s j­o­b­. E­a­s­y t­o j­o­i­n a­n­d e­a­r­n­i­n­g f­r­o­m t­h­i­s a­r­e j­u­s­t a­w­e­s­o­m­e­. J­o­i­n t­h­i­s r­i­g­h­t n­o­w b­y f­o­l­l­o­w i­n­s­t­r­u­c­t­i­o­n­s h­e­r­e­.­.­.­.

    Open This Website............>> https://www.dailypay7.com/

  19. Truthteller1   2 years ago

    The FDA is obsolete. Blow it up and start over.

  20. Honest Economics   2 years ago

    Everyone seems to want a "non political" solution from political agencies. You can't ever square that circle. The best outcomes would come when agencies like the FDA are eliminated altogether and let the market produce these products. Tort and contract law could easily accommodate any issues of negligence or malfeasance on the part of market participants.

    https://honesteconomics.substack.com/

    1. Roberta   2 years ago

      Sure, that'd be the best conceivable outcome. But how about among the choices that are actually before us? Why bother even discussing an ideal that never changes (Why should it?) but has no intersection with the world, while pretending to discuss current events?

      1. Vernon Depner   2 years ago

        If we didn't do that, these comment boards would be nearly empty.

      2. TJJ2000   2 years ago

        Because that 'ideal' is the only way to save the USA from it's rail into socialist despair.

      3. Honest Economics   2 years ago

        If it is the best conceivable outcome then we need to make it one of the choices before us. It is past time to make the best argument and make it stick. Cheers!

  21. Old Engineer   2 years ago

    "she sounds a lot like a libertarian"

    Robby, she's not that cute and I'll bet she's not worth a damn in the sack.

    Seriously, no one is a libertarian whose primary problem is being worried about sunscreen.

    1. Roberta   2 years ago

      Sunscreen is just one example of an issue.

    2. Medulla Oblongata   2 years ago

      Plus, one good rule of thumb is "Don't stick it in crazy."

  22. 31Trillion   2 years ago

    Broken clock

  23. Cyto   2 years ago

    What is with all the weird vogueing? Or is that hand modeling?

    Is that some kind of in-joke? Or is this their style... Look, I Pretty!??!

    It is really odd for a political leader, that's for sure. If there were some sort of weekly comedy satire skit show, surely they would mock this performance.....

  24. Vesicant   2 years ago

    "a nontrivial issue"

    Wow, where is the door to your world? I want to live in a world where sunscreen flavors are a "nontrivial issue." Must be nice to have all the real problems solved.

  25. JFK Jr   2 years ago (edited)

    Hey now….. Don’t get too excited, for even a stopped clock is correct twice a day.

    And BTW, I do doubt AOC could even spell 'Libertarian' without a teleprompter.
    Boston University's Finest...!!! They're seen as the short-bus VoTech college of the Boston area, thanks to her.....

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How the NCAA Helped Trump Score Big on Transgender Issues

Billy Binion | 7.2.2025 5:34 PM

Under the 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' Car Companies Won't Be Fined for Failing To Hit Arbitrary Fuel Efficiency Goals

Joe Lancaster | 7.2.2025 5:15 PM

The 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Keeps Most of Joe Biden's Energy Subsidies

Jeff Luse | 7.2.2025 4:44 PM

Florida Plans To Deputize 9 National Guardsmen as Immigration Judges To Increase Deportations

Autumn Billings | 7.2.2025 4:08 PM

The Tax Bill Rewards States for Higher Rates of Food Stamp Fraud

Eric Boehm | 7.2.2025 3:25 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!