FBI Made 'Inappropriate Use' of Foreign Surveillance Program To Spy on Americans
A White House panel says the FBI's internal control over Section 702 databases are "insufficient to ensure compliance and earn the public's trust."

A White House advisory board has recommended that Congress place new restrictions on the FBI's access to a foreign surveillance tool to prevent the bureau from using it to spy on Americans' electronic communications.
That surveillance program—authorized by Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)—was intended to track foreign spies and potential terrorists but has predictably morphed into a way for law enforcement agencies to get a warrantless peek at Americans' phone records, emails, and other electronic communications. In the report published Monday, the White House's Intelligence Advisory Board said the FBI's use of the databases created by Section 702 should be limited to investigations dealing with foreign intelligence—the same standard that is used at the other intelligence agencies with access to that data.
"FBI's use of Section 702 should be limited to foreign intelligence purposes only and FBI personnel should receive additional training on what foreign intelligence entails," the report recommends. The report says the FBI has made "inappropriate use of Section 702 authorities, specifically U.S. person queries."
While the full scope of Section 702 data collection remains unknown, there's no doubt about the FBI's aggressive use of the database. In 2021, for example, the FBI ran more than 3.3 million queries through the Section 702 database, according to a government transparency report. Separately, a 2021 report from the secret federal court responsible for adjudicating FISA-related matters documented 40 instances in which the FBI accessed surveillance data as part of investigations into a host of purely domestic crimes, including health care fraud and public corruption.
The FBI imposed new internal restrictions on the use of Section 702 surveillance last year, but the new White House report says those changes are "insufficient to ensure compliance and earn the public's trust."
Indeed, the public (and Congress) ought to be wary of the FBI's promises to police itself—and of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court's (FISC) ability to hold the bureau accountable. As Reason's Scott Shackford detailed in 2021, the FBI had promised the FISC in the wake of the Carter Page scandal that it would change procedures to stop snooping on Americans. The FISA court rubber-stamped those changes.
But the new White House report suggests the FBI is still up to its old tricks with regard to Section 702. As the Associated Press notes, the report details how the FBI used its access to the database to run queries for "a U.S. senator and state senator's names without properly limiting the search, looking for someone believed to have been at the Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection and doing large queries of names of protesters following the 2020 death of George Floyd."
Those latest revelations show that "the Federal Bureau of Investigation simply cannot be trusted with conducting foreign intelligence queries on American persons," wrote Matthew Guariglia, a senior policy analyst at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which advocates for privacy in online communications, last week. "Regardless of the rules, or consistent FISC disapprovals, the FBI continues to act in a way that shows no regard for privacy and civil liberties."
The FBI's ongoing misuse of the Section 702 database has become a hot-button political topic, particularly among Republicans who are unhappy about the bureau's surveillance of former President Donald Trump's allies, including Page. A group of six Republican lawmakers led by Rep. Matt Gaetz (R–Fla.) and including Rep. Thomas Massie (R–Ky.) have introduced a resolution calling for Congress to allow FISA to expire at the end of the year. Meanwhile, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have spoken out about the need for reforms to Section 702 in advance of the December deadline for the program's reauthorization.
The federal intelligence community seems to be taking that threat to its snooping seriously. Monday's report claims that blocking the reauthorization of the spying program would be "one of the worst intelligence failures of our time." In a statement, White House National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan said Congress should reauthorize the program "without new and operationally damaging restrictions on reviewing intelligence lawfully collected by the government and with measures that build on proven reforms to enhance compliance and oversight."
It would appear that the FBI's abuse of Section 702 to spy on Americans' communications has exceeded even the intelligence community's willingness to defend such unconstitutional techniques. As such, revoking the FBI's ability to use the Section 702 database to investigate routine crimes ought to be the starting point for congressional negotiations over the future of the program.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Start now earning cash every month online from home. Getting paid more than ****k by doing an easy job online. I have made **** in last 4 weeks from this job. Easy to join and earning from this are just awesome. Join this right now by follow instructions
.
.
here,═══☛☛ elizabethashley8.blogspot.com/
Secret courts are Un-American
The FISA court should be allowed to expire.
Especially as they were caught spying on President Trump’s campaign
Duh!
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,300 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,300 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
Break apart the FBI. It was corrupt from the start and is unsalvageable.
Every single thing it does is duplicated elsewhere already, but with less malfeasance.
How do you figure less malfeasance elsewhere?
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning sixteen thousand US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome7.com
Proudly violating the civil rights of Americans since July 26, 1908.
FBI??!! What about state/local police, the overwhelming source of the creepy surveillance which drives the USA to the world championship of per capita imprisonment AND total prison population??
True, but not relevant to this story.
Well, no shit.
What do you expect when everything is done in a "secret" court. Is there anything more dystopian than a secret government proceeding that nobody can audit or do anything about?
Uh, the title has this backwards. They don't "earn" the public's trust. They have it by definition. They are subject to the same laws as any of us when it comes to civil rights.
Should they violate it, as they have here, prosecute and fire them!
Why is government always pussy footing around about these kinds of things?
I worked in government and yes, there are all these "rights' for the employees, strong unions, etc. But none of those are a prevention to termination when government employees act in criminal or civil violation of their mandate.
Just fire their asses and move on!
Nope. Been hearing this excuse - that we can use existing laws to punish them if they abuse their power - for my entire life. It's an empty promise intended only to hold off reforms. No one's going to fire their asses, much less prosecute them, and courts effectively acknowledged that way back when they came up with the exclusionary rule.
They are subject to the same laws as any of us when it comes to civil rights.
Oh, bullshit. How many times has the exclusionary rule been used to throw out illegally gathered evidence? Since each of those represented a civil rights violation, shouldn't there be, roughly, one arrest of an officer for each instance? Or at least one firing?
Maybe not one to one.
There genuinely is a difference between an unintentional violation -- which should still be part of the exclusionary rule -- and the systemic and constant abuse of power violating both the letter and spirit of a law to circumvent constitutional restrictions.
Still, you're right. There should be scads of prosecutions for this shit. There are next to none, and you're not able to seek recompense in civil court, either. They are very obviously not subject to the same laws as the rest of us.
Sure, because law enforcement gives a lot of breaks to people who "unintentionally" break the law. Try again.
Until those in the FBI suffer consequences to breaking the rules, no amount of "education" will make a difference.
I'm shocked that an agency whose headquarters was named after a man who not only spied on Americans but used the information for blackmail and extortion, would engage in spying, blackmailing and extortion.
This one can't be fixed, it needs to be torn down completely. Build up the Federal Marshall Office with one absolute requirement, no former FBI agents may ever work there. Let them go work in the Job Corps or the Department of Agriculture, or better yet, the Civil Aeronautics Board.
I was going to say that COINTELPRO looks quaint compared to what's going on now.
Another slap in the face to those that say if you have done nothing wrong you have nothing to worry about. Hopefully a hard AF slap.
Hopefully, a stern;y-worded letter will fix this right up and, if not, a second sternly-worded letter will.
Maybe Democrats have finally realized what goes around, comes around. They would be really, really unhappy if the FBI were to do to them as they have had it do to Republicans for the last decade.
All requests for data under this law need to go through the CIA ONLY. FBI makes request, CIA decides whether it is in the realm of search.
With regard to the FBI itself, it needs to be broken into 5 distinct realms.
Investigation of Government elected and appointed officials. (Separate division)
The investigation of complaints against ANY and EVERY police officer with federal prosecution (no more internal affairs). This is already the federal law but has never been practiced. Separate division)
The search for known federal (interstate) criminals, bank robbers etc. (separate division).
Investigations of wire fraud, interstate transportation of stolen goods. (separate division)
Kidnapping and slave/sex trade (separate division).
Possibly one more, organized crime, but that needs to be a joint task force of the above, bringing in the experts from each field when there is too much overlap. A federal judge should have to order each investigation in joint task and give its limits.
regardless of any of this, where any officer knew or SHOULD HAVE KNOWN that they were violating the rights of citizens, that officer should be prosecuted (investigated by the Federal Marshalls office), the officer terminated and lose his retirement and all other benefits (they shall be given to the VICTIMS).
The law should be clear that any information collected incidentally must be immediately turned over to the proper division and no further action shall be taken.
""FBI's use of Section 702 should be limited to foreign intelligence purposes only and FBI personnel should receive additional training"...the report recommends." Totally inadequate recommendations.
Until DOJ starts securing felony convictions against Fed LEO's for 702 violations, the cost/benefit ratio for violation of constitutional protections will remain too enticing for lazy, corrupt Feds.
I remember the good old days when Leftist idiots said anyone who claimed that the US government was spying on us citizenry was a ‘Alex Jones tin-foil hat wearer’ we’ll time has passed and us tin-foil hat people are proven CORRECT. Yet AGAIN.
Apparently "made inappropriate use" is the latest leftist code phrase for "committed tens of thousands of capital crimes."