Ron DeSantis Says He's a Christian. He Should Read the Parable of the Good Samaritan.
It's wrong to use human beings as pawns in an apparent political stunt.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis appears to be getting a bit big for his britches. He's not only imagining himself as the nation's next president as he competes for the Republican nomination, but he recently envisioned himself as one of Jesus' disciples during one of history's greatest dramas.
"These guys all went out and they dedicated their lives to spreading the gospel," DeSantis said in a televised interview on the Christian Broadcasting Network. "I look back at that and would love to have been able to be there with them." Some died horrific deaths as martyrs. None of them sought or gained governmental power, so it's an interesting take from an ambitious politician.
That's not the only area where DeSantis might need a Sunday school refresher. Recently, someone orchestrated unannounced charter air flights of immigrants from a refugee camp to Sacramento. As CNN reported, the Latin American asylum seekers, who had documents purportedly from Florida's government, were driven from Texas to New Mexico, then flown to California and dumped on the doorstep of the Catholic diocese.
"We are here because they offered us a job," a Venezuelan man told CNN. "We were deceived by the people who provided the flight service. They offered us jobs and housing." Defenders say the operation was voluntary because the refugees signed papers—even though few understood the English verbiage. DeSantis had been mum, but his administration later reportedly defended the flights by saying the migrants were well-treated.
Last year, DeSantis boasted that he sent 50 migrants from a Texas facility (yes, Florida officials went to Texas to do this) to the Massachusetts vacation town of Martha's Vineyard. "There may be more flights, there may be buses," DeSantis told cheering supporters. As Reuters reported, Texas' Republican Gov. Greg Abbott sent 17,000 migrants to Washington, D.C., New York, and Chicago.
The obvious goal is to force Democratic states to deal with the consequences of a Democratic administration's lax immigration policy. The Biden administration denies that it is ignoring the border problem and claims illegal border crossings are down 70 percent, but in January Pew Research Center found that encounters between border agents and immigrants were at record levels. DeSantis is making border security a top political issue.
Ironically, many recent migrants are from Venezuela, which suggests the situation isn't entirely the result of a porous border, as The New Yorker noted, but the failure of a far-off communist hellhole that has displaced 20 percent of its population. The article reminded us that non-border-state Florida typically has welcomed refugees from totalitarian Cuba.
Real border states are struggling to deal with an influx of illegal border-crossers and those seeking asylum. Voters should certainly debate the nation's immigration policies, which are fair game for earnest disagreement. Can't both sides agree, however, that it's wrong to use human beings as pawns in an apparent political stunt?
Do these airlifts sound like something Jesus and his disciples would have supported or something from uncaring Roman authorities? As the Gospel of Luke explains, Caesar Augustus mandated a census, thus requiring people who lived in the Roman Empire to trudge to their home towns to be registered for tax purposes. Jesus ended up in a manger after Mary and Joseph failed to find a place to stay.
During his ministry, Jesus had much to say about how we should treat strangers. In the story of the Good Samaritan, for instance, a lawyer questions Jesus about how he can receive eternal life. Jesus answers by telling him to love the Lord with all his heart and to "love your neighbor as yourself."
The lawyer responds in a lawyerly way: "Who is my neighbor?" And then Jesus tells the parable, by which the Samaritan helps a traveler who was left for dead by robbers—after a priest and Levite passed by the injured man. The real neighbor was the lowly man who helped the traveler, not the religious officials who went along their merry way.
After the migrants were dropped off in Sacramento, religious groups have tended to their needs, which showed that some people know the right way to behave. Attorney General Rob Bonta promised an investigation into whether the trip involved "state-sanctioned kidnapping." Gov. Gavin Newsom blasted DeSantis in a vicious tweet. I'm no fan of these politicians, either, but they are right to be outraged.
Sacramento Mayor Darrell Steinberg struck the right tone: "Sacramento is going to do everything it can to care for these vulnerable people who are dropped off at our doorsteps. No matter what the terrible motivation was from whoever did this, that's our job." In fact, liberal communities have schooled these conservative politicians by providing assistance to the stranded migrants.
They indeed have been Good Samaritans. DeSantis might envision himself as one of Jesus' disciples, but before he gets too carried away he might want to brush up on that parable.
This column was first published in The Orange County Register.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Are you saying Sacramento is a worse place than a refugee camp?
Well, it is in California...
Just so everyone is on the same page regarding claims of refugee status, here's what the United States agreed to: https://www.unhcr.org/media/convention-and-protocol-relating-status-refugees
Pages 16 through 37 are the important bits, as well as 53 and 54 (to make the previous part apply to people who became asylum seekers after January 1st, 1951) with the rest being a lot of fluffy prefatory text and things such as details about what information should appear on passports. 23 double-spaced, wide margin pages.
The criticism doesn't even hold. DeSantis sent them to a place that will welcome them with open arms, supposedly, and give them all the benefits of citizenship without having to actually become citizens.
I can't think of a better deal or more Christian thing to do for migrants than to lovingly transport them for free to these sanctuary cities.
I know that the worst place has to be wherever they teach this nonsense below as truth:
Do these airlifts sound like something Jesus and his disciples would have supported or something from uncaring Roman authorities? As the Gospel of Luke explains, Caesar Augustus mandated a census, thus requiring people who lived in the Roman Empire to trudge to their home towns to be registered for tax purposes. Jesus ended up in a manger after Mary and Joseph failed to find a place to stay.
The Romans simply did not conduct their census in this manner. This could have required months of travel by foot, horse, mule, or camel, during which time the citizen wouldn’t be able to work and pay taxes.
The Romans may have been brutal tax collectors and slavers, but they weren’t damn stupid. So already, the New Testiment story of Jesus in The Holy Bible has a big factual error and is wrong.
They're not human beings. They're illegals. Jeez.
See, this is the most infuriating and depressing thing about this whole episode.
It would be one thing if DeSantis' supporters would say something like "Yeah, well we know it wasn't totally right to treat people like this, but we had to make this important point yada yada yada..."
But mostly they don't even pretend to recognize the dignity or the humanity of the migrants. It's instead YOU GO DESANTIS! PWN THE LIBS! WATCH THOSE LIBRULS CRY! HAHAHAHA!
Would we expect a President DeSantis to treat migrants any more humanely than a Governor DeSantis did?
We've seen the political landscape on the right move from "migrants are just people who want to earn a better life for themselves but they should come here legally", now to "migrants are dangerous criminal invaders who should be treated like the vermin that we know them to be". Where does the end of this road lie?
https://reason.com/2022/09/27/for-florida-gov-ron-desantis-political-stunts-are-more-important-than-substance/ and
https://reason.com/2022/09/21/are-ron-desantis-migrant-flights-legal/
Ass POTUS, DeSatan will be forcing USA taxpayers to trick and ferry billions upon brazilians of sub-Brazilians from Brazil to Botswana, and to deport illegal sub-Martians from Mars to Uranus! Ass long ass the illegal Martians SUFFER-SUFFER-SUFFER, red-meat-hungry socons and troglodytes will be DELIGHTED to spend those extra tax dollars! Butt I for one think that illegal Martians are intelligent beings, too, and hope that they will NOT suffer on Uranus, from too many foul odors, etc.!
DeSatan… SPEAKS to me! Get Thee behind me, DeSatan!
Scienfoology Song… GAWD = Government Almighty’s Wrath Delivers
DeSatan loves me, This I know,
For DeSatan tells me so,
Little ones to GAWD belong,
We are weak, but GAWD is strong!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
DeSatan tells me so!
DeSatan loves me, yes indeed,
Makes the illegal sub-humans bleed,
Protects me for geeks and freaks,
I LOVE to pay taxes, till my wallet squeaks!
PUNISH Disney, I’ll PAY for their pains,
Ass long ass DeSatan Blesses our gains!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
DeSatan tells me so!
DeSatan expels the low-lifes to Venus,
Moves them ANYWHERE, with His Penis!
His Penis throbs with His Righteousness,
Take no heed, He says, of His Frighteousness!
ALL must be PUNISHED, they say!
So never, EVER be or say gay!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
DeSatan tells me so!
Our USA taxes must PAY The Way, He may say,
To EXPORT the illegal Mars aliens, every day!
To Pluto, Jupiter, or Uranus, they must ALL go!
Oh, the places that the low-lifes will go, you must know!
The taxes we shall pay? Through the money, we must BLOW!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
DeSatan tells me so!
(If we did NOT do-doo, doo-doo-doo, ALL of this, then that them thar illegal Mars aliens WILL show up on OUR doors, in the formerly pure USA!!! We MUST keep them AWAY, far away, out in the Deep Dark Yonder!)
#MeInTheAss’CauseI’maGullibleLowBrowBlowHardConTard
#BeenTrumpledUnderfootForFarTooLong
Stop calling them "migrants." That implies humanity. You're supposed to call them "illegals." That puts them on par with bootleg gin and counterfeit Steely Dan tickets.
I know, right?
And I think this points to another core difference between libertarians and conservatives (at least today's conservatives).
While both libertarians and conservatives tend to believe in a hierarchy of humanity (unlike the left, which tends to have utopian dreams of complete equality in all ways), in that we tend to believe that people are different, those differences will naturally produce different results, and there is nothing inherently wrong with that; libertarians anyway will say that there is a limit to this hierarchical classification of humanity. That on the level of *natural rights*, even the dumbest poorest sickest Guatemalan has exactly the same natural rights as the smartest richest healthiest American. They are the same on this level. But for today's conservatives, I think that hierarchy of difference is far more totalizing. They are more willing to believe that the Guatemalan is simply an inferior human being than the American, and are not as willing to recognize the innate natural rights that they have.
Yet if a plane filled with children crashed in a jungle the Guatemalan kids would survive while the Republican children would die clutching their smart phones.
What a relatable and totally true scenario, drunky! Lazy entitled American kids are too soft to even bother surviving a catastrophic plane crash, but those strong, swarthy Guatemalan children would surely keep the plane afloat by sticking their arms out the windows and flapping them like wings while those lazy Americans just looked on, stupefied.
THIS IS WHAT PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN PLACES WHERE CUBAN SANDWICHES DON'T EXIST BECAUSE THERE'S NO SPICS TO TELL PEOPLE ABOUT THEM ACTUALLY BELIEVE
I would be willing to bet money and lay odds on that outcome. And it's the Republicans (plus Jesus freak Dems like WJ Bryan) who--since Roosevelt was elected by Czolgosz--banned South American exports and coerced their trade and economies into backward poverty. The irony is delightful.
It's easy to reach that conclusion when it's the conclusion you started with, even though it isn't supported by even one single shred of actual evidence, nor could you even be fucked to link to some radical left wing publication to even circle jerk your pre-formed conclusion for you, cytotoxic. Everyone possesses natural rights by virtue of being human. What they do not possess are positive legal rights, which are jurisdictional. That's what those imaginary lines on the map that you think shouldn't exist called "borders" are for. They delineate where jurisdictions begin and end. A Guatemalan has the same right not to be murdered as a Nepali or an American, or even a piece of shit Marxist Canadian like yourself. He just doesn't have a right to enter the United States without permission and receive food, housing, clothing, and provision at no expense to himself due to the largess of taxpayers.
See, this is the most infuriating and depressing thing about this whole episode.
It would be one thing if Democrats would say something like “Yeah, well we know we didn't really illegal immigrants to come to our city, but we had to declare ourselves a sanctuary city to make this important point yada yada yada…”
But mostly they don’t even pretend to recognize the hypocrisy or the humanity of the migrants. It’s instead YOU ARE RACIST AND HORRIBLE FOR BRINGING THEM TO OUR CITY! WAAAAA!
Them Democrats, man. Their evil actions leave Republicans no choice but to be evil right back!
There's nothing evil about asking someone to live up to their affected principles, Episiarch/Bo Cara Esq. There is something evil about affecting principles and then abandoning them as soon as you are actually confronted with a scenario where you have to live by them, though.
Hi, Tulpa! How was your Father’s Day? (I think that’s the last time we spoke.)
I don't see the Republicans wanting to import a new slave class. That's there goal. But you are such an unserious troll it's not worth it.
Sending them to sacto is treating them like “vermin”?
Virtue signaling hyperbole is not helping anything.
The rhetoric has been exactly the same ever since 15 years ago when you were still using your cytotoxic handle and unironically saying that American citizens should have their welfare benefits taken away from them and given to illegal immigrants because illegal immigrants are better people who deserve it more, cytotoxic. Weirdly, people who actually have to live in the border towns and cities overwhelmed by hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants per month have a slightly different view of it than you do up in the greater Toronto area in Canada where you live with your mother, or drunky does from his "I ain't never heard of a Cuban sammich, we ain't got no spics in Maine" section 8 apartment.
He gave them the choice to take free flights to California.
What exactly do you think "isn't right" about that?
Wait is he putting them in camps? Wait, that is the Federal Government (AOC hiding btw. He is sending them to places that said they would take them all. How hard is that for you to understand? Oh wait, it's easy to say that when it doesn't affect you.
Come on down to the Texas border Jeff. Come hang out and see how you like it.
Can you two get a room, please?
Book it right next to your circle-jerk with JA, ML, RM, Chucky and the rest of the trolls.
Post the Mean Girls list, drunky!
They like to make people watch.
Are we sure DeSantis ain’t one of ‘em. His name sounds kinda I-talian.
Mike exposes his racism once again.
Yeah; Criminals are human beings….
Who CHOSE to break the law. (Trespass on someone else’s greener pasture).
I mean; being a human being HAS to entitle one to graze any pasture in sight.... right, right? /s
If being in the country without government permission is trespassing, then that means government owns where they live, work and shop. Didn't know you were a big supporter of socialism.
Socialism isn’t the government owning just anything though, it’s owning the means of production. We aren’t quite there yet.
However;
The government DOES own all the land, (that’s why we pay to rent it from them), and they get to decide who or who doesn’t cross the country’s border.
Drunky doesn't understand fee simple and allodial title in real property because the landlord of his section 8 apartment didn't think it was important enough to explain to him.
Let us not forget the illegal scum he flew from Texas to Martha’s Vineyard were legal asylum seekers. That was a little fuckup on the part of his agent in Texas (which, according to recent reports, is not located in Florida).
But they still got kicked out of Martha’s Vineyard.
Honest question: don’t the asylum treaty’s require them to seek asylum at the first safe country?
Not really since they have no valid legal claim for asylum based on any law or precedent, and would have been legally obligated to claim asylum in the first country of safe harbor even if they did, but maybe they'll cover that in your 14th year of law school, eh Bo Cara Esq.?
Why didn't your Dems keep them there? They could of helped built that windfarm...oh that's right more virtue signaling.
Mike why don't you take them all in instead of complaining. It's easy to hide and spew racist stuff here right?
Rilly. Like pregnint females... no individual, no individual rights.
Yeah, don't dehumanize those honest, hard working spics that drunky never encountered before in his life because they don't have any spics up in Maine, and that's why he didn't know what a Cuban sandwich was despite being a professional gourmet chef.
They are "illegal aliens".
Like other criminals, they are also human beings.
Uh, Greenhut, have *you* read the parable of The Good Samaritan?
Because the Samaritan puts the traveler up at the inn and, while I've never been, I hear that Martha's Vineyard is pretty nice as far as inns go.
I must've missed the part of the Bible that says, "Christianity for thee, but not for me."
Hey now. MV didn't kick them all out. They kept 4. 1 to be a landscaper and 3 others to be roofers about painters.
And they fed them pizza!
The Good Samaritan did NOT put up the victim in an inn on Uranus, which smells pretty bad!
DeSatan tis of Thee,
Sweet Man of tyranny!
From every mountainside,
You can smell Him for free!
DeLand where de eagles glide!
DeLand where de illegals hide!
DeSatan, tis of Thee I sing,
To the liberals, tears You bring!
You make the proggies cry!
Talk with THEM?! Don’t even try!
DeSatan, tis of Thee I praise!
For the woke, Holy Hell You raise!
Illegal Martians? Low-life scum, You catch and send,
To Uranus with them! Ignore tax dollars You spend!
We must punish ALL, who to USA might sail,
At ALL costs, DeSatanism MUST prevail!
#MeInTheAss’CauseI’maGullibleLowBrowBlowHardConTard
#BeenTrumpledUnderfootForFarTooLong
Literally no one reads your shit, sarcasmic.
Literally EVERYONE has fucked your slutty pussy AND eaten your brains, Lucile, which is why you have none left!
Reason has joined the Atheists Tell Christians The Bible game.
I'd really be interested in what Greenhut's qualifications are for pontificating on what constitutes a good christian. Did he spend some years in a seminary I'm unaware of? Do tell!
Pretty sure he's a Jew.
JINO
Otherwise he'd have taken motes and beams to heart.
It's one of the most annoying political "gotchas" to be employed. This thing you believe in but I don't agree with is not being followed by you based on my own interpretation of the thing you believe in and participate in that I don't agree with or believe in.
What cuts through all of that crap? Are you doing good, or are you doing evil? The good will do good, and find their justification afterwards... The evil will do evil, and find their justification afterwards!
Gov DeSatan, ass we might expect from His Name (Cursed Be His Name, in shame!), wants to do evil! So HERE is Gov DeSatan's interpretation of "Biblical-Literal Christianity"!
God COMMANDS us to kill EVERYONE!
Our that them thar VALUES of society outta come from that them thar HOLY BIBLE, and if ya read it right, it actually says that God wants us to KILL EVERYBODY!!! Follow me through now: No one is righteous, NONE (Romans 3:10). Therefore, ALL must have done at least one thing bad, since they’d be righteous, had they never done anything bad. Well, maybe they haven’t actually DONE evil, maybe they THOUGHT something bad (Matt. 5:28, thoughts can be sins). In any case, they must’ve broken SOME commandment, in thinking or acting, or else they'd be righteous. James 2:10 tells us that if we've broken ANY commandment, we broke them ALL. Now we can’t weasel out of this by saying that the New Testament has replaced the Old Testament, because Christ said that he’s come to fulfill the old law, not to destroy it (Matt. 5:17). So we MUST conclude that all are guilty of everything. And the Old Testament lists many capital offenses! There’s working on Sunday. There’s also making sacrifices to, or worshipping, the wrong God (Exodus 22:20, Deut. 17:2-5), or even showing contempt for the Lord’s priests or judges (Deut. 17:12). All are guilty of everything, including the capital offenses. OK, so now we’re finally there... God’s Word COMMANDS us such that we’ve got to kill EVERYBODY!!!
(I am still looking for that special exception clause for me & my friends & family… I am sure that I will find it soon!)
Literally no one reads your shit, sarcasmic.
Literally EVERYONE has fucked your slutty pussy AND eaten your brains, Lucile, which is why you have none left!
And not the textually, factually, or historically correct version either. The "The Bible says what I say it does.", "Place no other Gods or morality before me.", atheist performative self-dick punch version.
LOL
Gotta appreciate the "doing religion wrong" angle from a site that supports Joe Biden, the devout Catholic leader of the legalize-post-viability-abortion party. 🙂
Reason, as a tax-exempt foundation, is prohibited from supporting any political candidate, and they didn't in 2020 either.
Many of the staff said the would "reluctantly support" Biden.
That means they're just as enthusiastic as the J6 tourists. Just look in the dictionary. "Reluctant" means "fervent."
Support is support, whether it's "reluctant" or enthusiastic.
They pulled the lever for Joe Biden. His positions were clearly articulated, so they either didn't do their homework and find out what they were, or they knew what they were and found them at least tolerable.
"...found them at least tolerable."
Maybe they found them less TOTALLY DISGUSTINGLY INTOLERABLE than the positions of The Pussy-Grabber In Chief! Who we now know wants to wipe His Precious Ass with the USA Cunts-Tits-Tuition!
The Meeting of the Right Rightist Minds will now come to Odor!
Years ago by now, Our Dear Leader announced to us, that He may commit murder in broad daylight, and we shall still support Him! So He Has Commanded, and So Must it be Done!
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jan/24/donald-trump-says-he-could-shoot-somebody-and-still-not-lose-voters
And now, oh ye Faithful of the Republican Church, It Has Become Known Unto us, that it is also in His Power and Privilege Ass Well, to murder the USA Constitution in broad daylight. Thus He Has Spoken, and Thus Must It Be Done! Thou shalt Render Unto Trump, and simply REND the USA Constitution, and wipe thine wise asses with it! Do NOT render unto some moldering old scrap of bathroom tissue! Lest we be called fools, or worse!
https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/03/politics/trump-constitution-truth-social/index.html
Proud Boys, STAND with TRUMP, and stand by! And if ye don’t agree 110%, then we don’t need you polluting our world, because all who disagree with us in ANY way are LEFTISTS!!!
There, I think that’s a wrap! I’ve covered it ALL! You can take the rest of the day off.
(You’re welcome!)
Literally no one reads your shit, sarcasmic.
Literally EVERYONE has fucked your slutty pussy AND eaten your brains, Lucile, which is why you have none left!
Who, precisely, is “they” in your sentences? Precisely, please. No hand waving.
Jesus Christ, Episiarch/Bo Cara Esq. Are you actually that fucking stupid or just hoping somebody else might be? "They" is referring to the Reason staffers who voted for Biden. See those comments connected to the one you replied to by a little dotted line? Those are called threaded comments! The ones that are indented and connected with a dotted line are called "replies." If you read the comments, and then read the replies, it's easier to figure out which noun in the comment the pronoun in the reply is referring to. Hope that helps, you faux-autistic fucking faggot.
So when you vote against some awful candidate, you fully and completely support every policy of their opponent.
Wait a minute, you don't? You're like nuanced and stuff?
Then why do you claim others do what you don't do?
You mean like how you've spent 16 hours a day literally every day of your life for the last 8 years sitting here in a drunken stupor telling anyone who voted for Trump that they are racist Nazis who support Trump killing immigrant and raping women, drunky? Like that? That kind of nuance? Oh what's that? You don't like having your own standards applied to you?
The funniest part of this comment was the implication that Sarc has standards.
Sarc only has substandards.
Catholics were really embarrased by Hitler. Good to see they can at least learn the definition of an individual right--unlike hooded socks.
Particularly when he sent thousands of them to death camps, including the majority of the occupants of Dachau, Hanky, you historically illiterate subhuman piece of shit.
even though few understood the English verbiage.
You know that we have seen the actual documents they are given and they are in both English and Spanish right?
What the fuck is this false propaganda?
It is now called journalism. You can get prizes if your lies follow the political narrative.
(see 1619 project)
Dude, the parable itself is 9 sentences long and Greenhut is clearly, at best, working from what he skimmed decades ago. You expect him to have read the signed agreements or know anyone who does?
While the author is recommending New Testament reading, he might want to read the bit where Jesus says judge not lest ye be judged.
“Steven and his wife live on an acreage outside of Sacramento”
That must be nice. Except for being in the socialist hellscape that is California. I assume since he knows the bible so well that he also knows the verse "He that hath two coats impart to him that hath none. So if he believes in open borders and has "acreage" and really believes in the "Good Samaritan" story, I'm sure he's opened his "acreage" up to homeless illegals.
So if he believes in open borders and has “acreage” and really believes in the “Good Samaritan” story, I’m sure he’s opened his “acreage” up to homeless illegals.
Yeah... I don't think I'd put a lot money on that bet...
But fuck, if I'm wrong, I'll actually send him a check to help pay for it.
His small farm looks quite nice and private, with no evidence of illegal immigration camps. It's certainly not like the shitholes of Portland and SanFran where illegals and homeless have ruined everything. He bought for $321k in 2011, and the property now has an estimated value of over $800k. Way to time the market. He should sell now and GTFO California. Or donate his land to illegals. After all, they didn't cross the border---the border crossed them! X)
So Steven and his wife should use YOUR tax money to ship the illegal sub-humans (in their neighborhood) to YOUR state, or to Mars or Uranus, just like DeSatan does! Problem(s) solved!
I thought the Federal govt is already doing that - under cover of night so as not to disturb the news cycle
Fed-Gov does that, sure. And in the past, has put babies and children in wire cages, separated them from Mom-Dad and lost track of who belongs to whom, etc. We elected the Fed clowns that have this done, and so be it. It would be the same if Gov DeSatan was doing the same thing WITHIN FLORI-DUH!!! But NOOO... Gov DeSatan spends FLORI-DUH tax money to ship "illegal sub-humans" from TEXAS to Martha's Vineyard! So ass POTUS, we can fully expect Gov DeSatan to trick and ferry billions upon brazilians of sub-Brazilians from Brazil to Botswana, and to deport illegal sub-Martians from Mars to Uranus! Ass long ass the illegal Martians SUFFER-SUFFER-SUFFER, red-meat-hungry socons and troglodytes will be DELIGHTED to spend those extra tax dollars! Butt I for one think that illegal Martians are intelligent beings, too, and hope that they will NOT suffer on Uranus, from too many foul odors, etc.!
https://reason.com/2022/09/27/for-florida-gov-ron-desantis-political-stunts-are-more-important-than-substance/ and
https://reason.com/2022/09/21/are-ron-desantis-migrant-flights-legal/
So things are bad, but if we're stupid and evil enough to elect DeSatan ass POTUS... Things will get WORSE! FAR worse!
You could have just said "Yes, and I'm a moron" without the extra paragraph of your lame ass copypasta that literally no one read, sarcasmic.
"Jesus says judge not lest ye be judged."
Judge yourself by the same standards that you use to judge others with!
Jesus ALSO called evil people broods of vipers! That's pretty judgmental, wouldn't you say?
https://biblehub.com/matthew/23-33.htm
You brood of vipers, how can you who are evil say anything good? For out of the overflow of the heart, the mouth speaks.
Do you not take your meds as prescribed?
All of those who disagree with MEEEE are… Mentally ILL!!! YES, this! Good authoritarians KNOW this already!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry_in_the_Soviet_Union
All of the GOOD totalitarians KNOW that those who oppose totalitarianism are mentally ill, for sure!!!
Muted.
I bet you mute your conscience as well, ye part of the brood of vipers!
https://biblehub.com/matthew/23-33.htm
You brood of vipers, how can you who are evil say anything good? For out of the overflow of the heart, the mouth speaks.
This is the way.
He does not.
You mean like when you were just crying like a bitch because somebody held the Reason staff accountable for who they voted for in the exact same way that you've spent the last 8 years calling anyone who you suspect might have voted for Trump a Nazi, sarcasmic? Like that?
Here’s where your argument is weak: Greenhut does not claim to be a Christian or to be a follower of Christian principles.
What Greenhut did do is lay on an argument that DeSantis is not following *his* professed Christian principles.
Inquisitive Squirrel 53 mins ago
It’s one of the most annoying political “gotchas” to be employed. This thing you believe in but I don’t agree with is not being followed by you based on my own interpretation of the thing you believe in and participate in that I don’t agree with or believe in
What cuts through all of that crap? Are you doing good, or are you doing evil? The good will do good, and find their justification afterwards… The evil will do evil, and find their justification afterwards!
Gov DeSatan, ass we might expect from His Name (Cursed Be His Name, in shame!), wants to do evil! So HERE is Gov DeSatan’s interpretation of “Biblical-Literal Christianity”!
God COMMANDS us to kill EVERYONE!
Our that them thar VALUES of society outta come from that them thar HOLY BIBLE, and if ya read it right, it actually says that God wants us to KILL EVERYBODY!!! Follow me through now: No one is righteous, NONE (Romans 3:10). Therefore, ALL must have done at least one thing bad, since they’d be righteous, had they never done anything bad. Well, maybe they haven’t actually DONE evil, maybe they THOUGHT something bad (Matt. 5:28, thoughts can be sins). In any case, they must’ve broken SOME commandment, in thinking or acting, or else they’d be righteous. James 2:10 tells us that if we’ve broken ANY commandment, we broke them ALL. Now we can’t weasel out of this by saying that the New Testament has replaced the Old Testament, because Christ said that he’s come to fulfill the old law, not to destroy it (Matt. 5:17). So we MUST conclude that all are guilty of everything. And the Old Testament lists many capital offenses! There’s working on Sunday. There’s also making sacrifices to, or worshipping, the wrong God (Exodus 22:20, Deut. 17:2-5), or even showing contempt for the Lord’s priests or judges (Deut. 17:12). All are guilty of everything, including the capital offenses. OK, so now we’re finally there… God’s Word COMMANDS us such that we’ve got to kill EVERYBODY!!!
Literally no one reads your shit, sarcasmic.
Literally EVERYONE has fucked your slutty pussy AND eaten your brains, Lucile, which is why you have none left!
Sorry if it annoys Inquisitive Squirrel and you. It is a valid mode of criticism against a campaigning politician who touts ethical beliefs and then acts hypocritically.
The problem is the person assuming and ascribing a particular set of ethical beliefs on the other person and then claiming that person is not living up to them. Which is ironically coupled with the fact that the person making the charge doesn't actually believe in those ethical positions to begin with. It's simply a bad faith argument and does very little at best to show hypocrisy.
It'd be like accusing someone who likes basketball that they don't like basketball because they don't believe Michael Jordan is the GOAT. It's basically a straw man ethical position ascribed in order to use it as a gotcha.
"As a Good Christian, I say unto ye, that y'all should be a GOOD Christian, and love ALL of your neighbors, like I do!"
And then the NEXT day, I spew utter hatred at the illegal sub-humans, and urge y'all to HATE and DESPISE them? And you can NOT see fit to call me a hypocrite... "Do as I say, and not as I do"?
What if I am a BLMer, and I espouse LOVE, and then riot and destroy things? Would you see fit to call me a hypocrite THEN? Or does it only matter what TRIBE I belong to? Tribalism uber alles!!!!
Am I right, or am I a right-wing wrong-nut?
Just an FYI again to you. I have you muted and won't respond to you. You're obviously free to keep posting responses to me, but just want to make it clear why I don't respond to you.
So you've muted me, butt just ass you say that... You respond to me! Are ye ALSO muting yer CONSCIENCE? Inquiring minds want to KNOW, dammit!
(You have ASStutely refuted me... By muting me! Way to go, Oh Great Intellectual Tower of Power, of the Hour! Nanny-nanny-noo-nah, can't hear you!)
Literally no one reads your shit, sarcasmic.
Literally EVERYONE has fucked your slutty pussy AND eaten your brains, Lucile, which is why you have none left!
This is the way.
It will still respond.
I presume it says things that are as deranged and vile as everything else it says when it does, but the hilarious part is the fact that it thinks anyone who doesn't respect it enough to read its ramblings would respect it enough to assign any value to its rantings just because they're personalized.
Really, atypical antipsychotics would do it a world of good.
All of those who disagree with MEEEE are… Mentally ILL!!! YES, this! Good authoritarians KNOW this already!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry_in_the_Soviet_Union
All of the GOOD totalitarians KNOW that those who oppose totalitarianism are mentally ill, for sure!!!
Literally no one reads your shit, sarcasmic.
And yet you spend 16 hours a day, every day of your life, deflecting any criticism of Democrats who fail to live up to their stated principles, including using the national guard to forcibly remove a couple of dozen immigrants out of the hundreds of thousands that crossed the border in Texas and made their way up to their legally-defined "sanctuary" city, as "whataboutism" and "ad hominem", Episiarch/Bo Cara Esq. It's almost like you're just a stupid piece of shit partisan shill running any gambit you can to deflect from your radical Marxist fellow travelers or something.
Show me where in the Bible it says there shouldn't be any borders.
"Love your neighbor?"
What, the invisible ink there says "except if your neighbor lives across the invisible lines in the sand, on the other, WRONG-TRIBE side of the line?"
“Do-gooder derogation” (look it up) is a socio-biologically programmed instinct. SOME of us are ethically advanced enough to overcome it, using benevolence and free will! For details, see http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Do_Gooders_Bad/ and http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Jesus_Validated/ .
Then they crucified Jesus, 'cause Jesus made them look bad! ALSO because Jesus made them look bad FOR THEIR STUPID, HIDE-BOUND TRIBALISM! "The parable of the Good Samaritan" was VERY pointed, because the Samaritans were of the WRONG tribe, in the eyes of "Good Jews" of the day.
Still literally no one reads your shit, sarcasmic.
Is there anyone who has NOT muted this?
Hi Tulpa!
“Dear Abby” is a personal friend of mine. She gets some VERY strange letters! For my amusement, she forwards some of them to me from time to time. Here is a relevant one:
Dear Abby, Dear Abby,
My life is a mess,
Even Bill Clinton won’t stain my dress,
I whinny seductively for the horses,
They tell me my picnic is short a few courses,
My real name is Mary Stack,
NO ONE wants my hairy crack!
On disability, I live all alone,
Spend desperate nights by the phone,
I found a man named Richard (Dick) Decker,
But he won’t give me his hairy pecker!
Dick Decker’s pecker is reserved for farm beasts,
I am beastly, yes! But my crack’s full of yeasts!
So Dear Abby, that’s just a poetic summary… You can read about the Love of my Life, Richard Decker, here:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/10/11/farmers-kept-refusing-let-him-have-sex-with-their-animals-so-he-sought-revenge-authorities-say/ and https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/sex-animals-bestiality-farm-cows-horses-richard-decker-new-jersey-a9152136.html
Farmers kept refusing to let him have sex with their animals. So he sought revenge, authorities say.
Decker the hairy pecker told me a summary of his story as below:
Decker: “Can I have sex with your horse?”
Farmer: “Lemme go ask the horse.”
Pause…
Farmer: “My horse says ‘neigh’!”
And THAT was straight from the horse’s mouth! I’m not horsin’ around, here, no mare!
So Richard Decker the hairy pecker told me that, apparently never even realizing just HOW DEEPLY it hurt me, that he was all interested in farm beasts, while totally ignoring MEEE!!
So I thought maybe I could at least liven up my lonely-heart social life, by refining my common interests that I share with Richard Decker… I, too, like to have sex with horses!
But Dear Abby, the horses ALL keep on saying “neigh” to my whinnying sexual advances!
Some tell me that my whinnying is too whiny… Abby, I don’t know how to fix it!
Dear Abby, please don’t tell me “get therapy”… I can’t afford it on my disability check!
Now, along with my crack full of yeasts… I am developing anorexia! Some are calling me a “quarter pounder with cheese”, but they are NOT interested at ALL, in eating me!!! They will NOT snack on my crack!
What will I DO, Dear Abby?!?!?
-Desperately Seeking Horses, Men, or ANYTHING, in Fort Worth,
Yours Truly,
R Mac / Mary Stack / Tulpa / Mary’s Period / “.” / Satan
There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer slave or free, there is no longer male and female; for all of you are one in Christ.—Galatians 3:28
Greenhut, fuck you, you shilling twat.
Sacramento declared itself a sanctuary city.
These people are present in the country illegally.
Don't bitch about how the people who don't want them here are delivering them to the people who say they do want them, just because it puts them closer to you.
There have been four times as many illegal immigrants that have entered the country since Biden took office as are legitimate residents of my entire state. Or to put it another way, the entire population of New York City.
And shockingly enough, rents have gone insane and we have an enormous homeless problem now. Now, I'll admit that some portion of the rent issue is people fleeing your shithole state, but the massive influx of illegals certainly hasn't helped. If I could, I would gladly ship every last one of them to San Francisco, Sacramento, Portland, Seattle, Chicago, Boston, New York City, D.C., and so forth.
If I could, I would gladly ship every last one of them to San Francisco, Sacramento, Portland, Seattle, Chicago, Boston, New York City, D.C., and so forth.
With or without the consent of the migrants?
You're doing it again. "Consent" implies humanity. Illegals have no humanity because they are illegal.
That’s a lovely man of straw.
Just like Maine has no Cuban sandwiches because it has no spics, right Drunky the Gourmet Chef?
Two more individuals there whose input I don't respect enough to even bother reading.
Like, I haven't even muted "raspberrydinners" because no matter how misguided I consider his positions, he's at least clear about arguing them honestly. Sarc, Chemleft, The Squirrel, Lauren... they're just worthless, mendacious interlocutors. And that I'll not abide.
With their consent, of course; the alternatives being: imprisonment or self-deportation.
I wasn't aware that you needed consent to relocate someone who is already in government custody, cytotoxic.
These people are present in the country illegally.
Claiming asylum is not illegal.
Fraudulently claiming asylum is illegal. Most of these "migrants" have no basis for the claim and they know it. They make the claims intending to disappear before their hearings.
And you would know this how?
The exact same we we know if it's legitimate.
Outside of most of them coming here instead of the first country they pass, as per international law, you mean?
A Venezuelan who travels via land passes through (at minimum) seven other countries, those being Colombia, Panama, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Honduras, Guatemala, and Mexico.
Cite on this international law?
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/11/20/2019-25288/agreement-between-the-government-of-the-united-states-of-america-and-the-government-of-the-republic
An agreement between the US and Guatemala? Are you not embarrassed that that was the only cite you could come up with when asked to cite the international law everyone keeps alluding to?
Why would it embarrass anyone to have cited an agreement between two nations - you know, otherwise known as an "international agreement" or "international convention" - as an "international law" when that's perfectly accurate, Episiarch/Bo Cara Esq.? Are you not embarrassed that you're still so fucking stupid after your 16th year of pretend law school that you don't know the meanings of basic English language words or legal definitions?
Given the complete lack of shame displayed thus far, I presume he is not, in fact, embarrassed.
No, I'm not "embarrassed". The principle of a "safe third country" has been part of international agreements regarding refugees since the 1951 United Nations Convention on Refugees, but you are a pedant who specifically requested a cite to a LAW based on this principle.
Because they passed through at least one country in which, by law they should have applied for asylum and remained in.
That's how.
By law, the witches needed to be BURNED, and the slaves needed to STAY enslaved!
That's how! All Hail THE LAW!!!
Cite on this law?
It follows simply from US immigration law: if you try to enter the US from Mexico, obviously you are not currently persecuted and hence have no grounds on which to apply for refugee status in the US.
The definition of a "refugee" in the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. By the time you're 7 safe countries past where the country from which you are a refugee, you're a fucking tourist, Episiarch/Bo Cara Esq.
And you would know this how?
Because that's what they do.
Simple: you can only enter the US legally if you are a citizen or if you have a valid visa. If you have neither, your entry is illegal. This is independent of any status you claim.
Refugees must apply for asylum at a valid port of entry.
Courts may consider imminent fear of persecution or death to be a mitigating circumstance for entering the US illegally. But obviously, if you enter after crossing all of Mexico to enter the US illegally, that condition is not satisfied.
In addition, nobody has a right to asylum. Any country has complete control over who it chooses to grant and not grant asylum to. All that international law guarantees is the right to seek asylum; it does not impose an obligation on any nation grant asylum.
Economic opportunity is not a valid basis for asylum.
It is the way they are doing it.
Shockingly Reason is silent on the welfare issue and costs to illegal immigration as they promote it. Not a single story on what the sponsorship program actually requires. Paying all costs to benefits or costs on government from a migrant one sponsors. Instead reason seemingly advocates for ignoring these costs.
I bet Greenhut wouldn't ignore it nearly as much if he had a pile of them living in his yard.
I'll chip in to rent the bus.
I was wondering if Southwest would give a discount if you rented the whole plane. They already have an ABQ -> OAK route.
Last year, DeSantis boasted that he sent 50 migrants from a Texas facility (yes, Florida officials went to Texas to do this) to the Massachusetts vacation town of Martha's Vineyard.
Texas is where a huge chunk of these illegals are, but hey, if DeSantis wants to skip the bussing step, he can just come to Albuquerque and do a round up.
The obvious goal is to force Democratic states to deal with the consequences of a Democratic administration's lax immigration policy.
NO FUCKING SHIT.
Ironically, many recent migrants are from Venezuela, which suggests the situation isn't entirely the result of a porous border, as The New Yorker noted, but the failure of a far-off communist hellhole that has displaced 20 percent of its population. The article reminded us that non-border-state Florida typically has welcomed refugees from totalitarian Cuba.
Hrm, hang on, I've almost figured out what the difference here is... Oh yes, I've got it! It's that the refugees from Cuba are coming directly to Florida, and the refugees from Venezuela are traveling through, at minimum, seven other countries before they arrive at our border.
Are all seven of those other countries also communist hellholes? Or is this a bullshit comparison?
Real border states are struggling to deal with an influx of illegal border-crossers and those seeking asylum.
We sure as fuck are!
Voters should certainly debate the nation's immigration policies, which are fair game for earnest disagreement. Can't both sides agree, however, that it's wrong to use human beings as pawns in an apparent political stunt?
Making Democrats live up to what they preach for the rest of us is a political stunt, and sending them the people they claim they wanted is using those people as pawns. Got it.
Allowing mass illegal immigration and then crying about the fate of the poor "asylum seekers" is a political stunt.
Executive orders about illegal immigration are a political stunt, because they do nothing to permanently solve the problem. They just slap a politically expedient band aid and talking point on it.
Declaring yourself a "sanctuary city" while knowing that you'll personally bear almost *NONE* of the costs of mass illegal immigration is a political stunt.
Crying at a detention facility about poor illegal immgrant children and then doing *NOTHING* about the fact that thousands of them just disappear to god knows where is a political stunt.
The Democrats' entire position on illegal immigration is a political stunt. They want to cry, be outraged, and talk about Jesus would do, but have done absolutely nothing by way of legislative solutions to the problem.
Agree. They should make most immigration legal. That would solve a lot of problems, especially the one of an aging population.
Nice bullshit bait-and-switch conflation there, going from “illegal immigration” to “immigration”. Is this Fiona’s sock?
The only problem associated with an "aging population" is that it might possibly nuke the social welfare programs, which isn't actually a problem except for all the people the Democrats have been trying to attach to them for 70-plus years. Otherwise, that's just a bullshit assertion with no basis for actual alarm.
It's hard for a radical Marxist these days. On the one hand you have to be an environmentalist Malthusian depopulation campaigner, and on the other, you have to support unlimited immigration to every first world country because we aren't making enough babies. Well, I guess it's actually not that hard when you're an unprincipled piece of shit incapable of experiencing even the most fleeting moment of self awareness or cognitive dissonance.
They should make almost all crimes legal. That would empty the prisons and free more people to work.
There is legal immigration - you and Reason realize that right?
Crying at a detention facility about poor illegal immgrant children
Crying at an empty detention facility, at that.
Right, so we have Democrats and Republicans pulling political stunts. Do you acknowledge that there are political stunts from both major political parties?
No, Episiarch/Bo Cara Esq., forcing Democrats to live up to their pretended principles is not a political stunt.
Get out a map and locate Venezuela.
Which seven countries would they be coming from?
I said "through". Those would be Colombia, Panama, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Honduras, Guatemala, and Mexico.
I nearly went ahead and listed them in my original post there, so I'm not sure why you think asking is some sort of "gotcha". Again, which of them are communist hellholes?
Seems he assumed you could not read a map as he clearly cannot.
They complain about a few hundred being shipped to a 'place that wants them' (Virtue signaling). They don't care about the million on the border towns.
Perfect liberals here - all are high and mighty till it affects them.
not only did you write this, but you actually published it.
there's a difference between personal and public policy, but enjoy your moral high ground
there’s a difference between personal and public policy
Is there with DeSantis?
So which is it, Episiarch/Bo Cara Esq., he's a Christian Nationalist theocrat or an unprincipled Jesus-hating hypocrite?
enjoy your moral high ground
It's not his. The Christians left the border open and he's between squatting and renting it.
Some would like to claim asylum at Greenhut's house.
Anybody have the address?
Yep. I won't dox him here, but you can find it if you are adept with search engines.
Only took a few minutes to find Steven Greenhut's address. Don't worry, I won't dox him, but any one can find he lives on 5.89 acres. That's plenty of acres for housing some homeless illegals sent by DeSantis. Come on, Greenhut--be a good Samaritan and open up your property to those in need!
We all know real charity is forcing all taxpayers to fund it.
Exactly.
Immigrants are not sitting around waiting to be housed, fed, and given jobs, like some Appalachian hillbillies.
I propose sending homeless people in LA or San Francisco to Caracas or Havana, and Venezuelans and Cubans to LA and San Francisco.
At least they wouldn't shit on the sidewalk.
Oh. So they aren't being sheltered in hotels and schools in NYC and other blue cities. All misinformation i guess.
Yes they are. They are a huge cost in terms of taxpayer dollars.
A hotel five miles from me was purchased with state funds for a few hundred homeless people. The "non-profit" operating it won't prohibit drugs and alcohol use in the rooms. What could go wrong?
"Immigrants are not sitting around waiting to be housed, fed, and given jobs, like some Appalachian hillbillies."
You are a racist.
Is that really a shock?
Lol, hi there cytotoxic. You really had to create yet another sock to shill your "brown people are morally superior to lazy Americans" shtick again?
"I'm not going to dox you but it would be a shame if I did because you wrote something I don't like. Yep, it'd be a reaaaaallllll shame"
Yeah, it's kinda like what your faggot friends in Antifa do, shreek, only nobody is going to attempt to murder Greenhut.
https://twitter.com/Jordanpkjj/status/1674561600907534337?t=xjq6VDFrJWC1vxNOrN1HCA&s=19
In 2021, a group of French military officers signed a letter to the French President that had received over 130,000 signatures, warning of a future civil war in France, and that if decisive actions were not taken, the Military would be forced to take control of the country.
The letter stated that the French military was now composed of a "generation of fire" - a younger generation of politically motivated and patriotic soldiers who had seen combat and were ready to take action and enact harsh measures to save France.
France today is on the brink of civil war, with mass anarchy & destruction in multiple cities.
What we are witnessing are the dying breaths of a once great civilisation.
There is no other choice left for the French Military, because very soon it will be too late for anything...
[Link]
This is a big reason that Obama and Biden’s handlers have been trying to troon out the US military; like Franco with Spain, they understand that the military is one of the pillars of American identity, and has been for decades. The difference is that Franco empowered the miltiary while the current administration wants to cut its balls off, inject it with estrogen, and put it in a dress.
I had to look up 'troon' to be sure I understood what you were saying.
It sure does look like that is defense policy now.
Panotjer raspm why the democrats have to be removed immediately.
Goddamn, my typo reading skills are mad. I still managed to get that you meant "Another reason". 😀
https://twitter.com/Tinkzorg/status/1674721814914670596?t=EW5mj4udznmMgHTZwe9tdA&s=19
Really fucking funny that we were just going "bruh Ruzzia is like 48 hours from a civil collapse and blood on the streets!!!!!".
Turns out that 48 hours later the average Russian is still too busy drinking kvass and listening to hardbass to riot while France is falling apart.
[Link]
https://twitter.com/iamyesyouareno/status/1674737410553311236?t=8BgzOyz1LP6eph9HjM1BXw&s=19
They are dragging native Frenchmen from their vehicles and beating them.
This is not about the Algerian teenager that was killed, it’s about them taking over France.
[Video]
Mainstream "news" outlets aren't even mentioning the ethnicity of the "teenager" and the rioters.
In what way are these “migrants”, who are not supposed to be here in the first place, being harmed by being given transportation from Texas or Florida to Sacramento or Martha’s Vineyard?
https://twitter.com/spectatorindex/status/1674726409753993222?t=CWdxjkfl0a4HpIIdWBaFow&s=19
BREAKING: PSG coach Christophe Galtier has been arrested for an investigation into discrimination, after allegedly complaining about the number of 'blacks and Muslims' in the squad at former club Nice.
when they start arresting the soccer coaches it's Katie bar the door.
https://twitter.com/AmyMek/status/1674666367512084480?t=f1uzDdC-qQCbKmdV8AS6gQ&s=19
France has fallen...
Police are unable to control the migrant and left-wing riots taking place across the country. French media has surrendered and cannot keep track of the number of towns and cities across the country being looted, set on fire, and destroyed.
Islamic attacks, riots, murders, rapes, assaults, and lynching of police across France are part of a new normal in a country struggling with mass illegal migration.
France is now the main Islamic country in Europe, with more than 10% of its population being Muslim.
Islam is the second-largest religion in France, but it takes the first position when counting active practitioners.
There is no coming back from this - their future is Islamic!
(P.S. How are those strict "gun control" regulations working for the good guys in France? Politicians have left citizens defenseless)
[Link]
For funsies:
Always fun to go back and notice the insanely and rabidly racist and egotistical presumptions like "America wasn't mult-cultural until East Indians (I) got here." Shikha wove into all her stories.
In what universe is Shikha "conservative"?
Californians seem to confuse private acts of charity with government actions by force of arms.
But then, they are confused by many things - - - - - - - - -
For sound economic perspective go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
No.
oh man, you guys really got him *this* time! lol
"If he's really a Christian, he should.."
Every time I see this, my response is "Go fuck yourself."
especially because every time it's from a non-christian too
Yep. It almost always comes from non-Christians as a dumb, poorly understood interpretation of scripture to prop up their selfish and/or political religion. I'm not Christian, but was raised that way and absolutely hate this bit of virtue signaling theater. Don't try to use someone else's principles to attack them when you neither understand their principles nor adhere to a similar or even coherent philosophy.
Whatever Greenhut's personal beliefs are, he did pretty well with interpreting the scripture.
He really didn't, Episiarch/Bo Cara Esq., but it's good enough to fool teenage reddit atheists of all ages, like yourself.
Yep. Like others here, I'm not a Christian but was raised as such and have read the bible several times. I've read a lot of books about the history of scripture and the early Christian sects, which has been enlightening. Point being: I can smell the frauds who pull the shit this author did.
It's a valid criticism to make against a campaigning politician who touts certain ethical beliefs and then acts hypocritically. Sorry it upsets you.
What "certain ethical beliefs"? Please be specific, Bobby.
The Gospel, from the New Testament. Explained in the blog post above that we all supposedly read before commenting.
The blog post above has absolutely nothing to do with the gospel, Episiarch/Bo Cara Esq. Gospel means "good news" and it's a theological term of art referring to redemption through Jesus Christ as the Messiah. The blog post above employs a superficial interpretation of one parable told by Jesus Christ in the New Testament to try to score a political point. The parable of the Good Samaritan is no more "the gospel" than the Tuskegee Experiments are "the science."
If you find yourself moralizing like this, then you clearly don't understand the purpose of Jesus teaching with parables.
Jesus taught with parables, so ass to teach us all this: So long as you wear Your Protective Magic Underwear, You can do ANYTHING THAT PLEASES YOU, and NOT suffer the consequences!
Literally no one reads your shit, sarcasmic.
The other day I read that when squirrels lay in the shade and spread out to transfer heat to ground, it is referred to as "splooting".
https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/other/to-survive-extreme-heat-squirrels-go-sploot/ar-AA1dgupw
I made me laugh because I imagine that as the sound made when SQLYFKR shits his pants in the middle of a thread. It certainly has a cooling effect.
Ahhhh, "a wet sploot". Sort of a full stream sharting.
Oh, just fuck off, you sanctimonious cunt
I cannot believe I just read an article advertising Ron DeSantis as a Christian hypocrite and then following that title off into immigration policy. Perhaps a little less drugs in the morning huh?
Here's what the local Democratic "Christians" are saying in the sanctuary cities.
There are sooo many delicious ways to interpret this, now that Greenhut has brought his theological training into the conversation.
I'm not a Christian, nor versed in the verse, so like so many Reason links these days, I had to go TO the link to see how Reason has either misrepresented what was IN the link, or at least read the source material so I can interpret it on my own.
So there's this distillation from the link provided:
Who is the "man"? According to the original text which I got from another link, the man is a victim of robbers who attacked him and left him for dead. So now, I get all Jules from Pulp Fiction and I think to myself, who are the robbers? One interpretation might be that the Robbers are the government officials in the country from which the 'man' is fleeing. The Inn could be Martha's Vineyard where the migrants were sent to be taken care of. Or, perhaps the 'robber' is Ron DeSantis, who beat and robbed the migrants (of their dignity, I suppose), upon arriving in Martha's Vineyard, the fine people of MV said, "Sorry, there's no room at OUR inn, here's a Papa John's Pizza" an sent them away so that other people could pay for their care, because the fine Christians of MV expressly claimed they not only didn't have any room at the inn, but didn't have any resources to care for the man, despite having a sign on the Inn saying, "And none shall be turned away."
Again, I'm no Christian Theologian on the level of Greenhut, but I can't help but wonder if there's some Serpent parable that could get thrown in here.
Now, I would guess that the instant you indict the fine people of Martha's Vineyard, the quick response would be to snort and say, "They're not Christians" and then walk away beaming like a True Zinger has been done unto thee. I would be forced to agree, that they're definitely not acting like Christians, that much is clear, but I would also add that I don't really abide by their bullshit, socially constructed morality either, so here we sit, staring each other down, wondering who really is on the right side of history.
Looks like the fine citizens of Sanctuary cities haven't read... what the people they voted said they were going to do:
By the way, I spotted this story the other day. (At least) four of the Venezuelan asylum seekers DeSantis flew to Martha’s Vineyward stayed there:
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/28/us/migrants-desantis-marthas-vineyard.html
“Ms. Cauro is one of at least four migrants who have quietly stayed behind on the island, forming bonds with a community that opened what doors it could. Ms. Cauro, 25, is working as a landscaper. Her brother, Daniel, 29, and her cousin, Eliud Aguilar, 28, found jobs in painting and roofing.”
All four of them. Well played.
(Yes, I know it's the much-despised-around-these-parts New York Times. I'll try to find another link that isn't paywalled.)
The Times paints the whole situation in glowing terms. For example, the quote above describing "Ms. Caruso" as a landscaper when the actual work she is doing is pulling weeds. It also quickly glosses over the sticky detail that the asylum seekers are not supposed to be working. (A stupid rule, by the way.)
Still, the story does cover the basic facts: at least four migrants stayed in Martha's Vineyard, and we just found out about it two days ago.
Contrast with an opinion piece about the Times article that goes way over the top in trying to paint it all in a negative light (and fucks up the facts right in its title by calling the migrants "illegal", which they are not):
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/turns-out-illegal-immigrants-love-it-at-marthas-vineyard
"Remember all the anger and vitriol directed at Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) for sending illegal immigrants to Martha’s Vineyard in Massachusetts? Well, those illegal immigrants are loving their new life there.
"Well, at least the ones that liberals didn’t force to leave."
Here's a non-paywalled link:
https://dailycaller.com/2023/06/28/marthas-vineyard-desantis-immigrants/
That is heart warming. Perhaps another plane load should be sent, there seems to be no shortage?
How generous! I'll bet all 4 of them get to eat pizza every night too!
Here’s what the local Democratic “Christians” are saying in the sanctuary cities.
A smarmy pundit from Australia quoting people from Chicago?
Why, oh, why did I deign to watch one of your videos? If I recall correctly, weren't you the one who was going on the other day about people who watch TV news instead of finding higher-quality sources of information? I asked at the time what you considered a good source of information, and you never responded -- is this your idea of quality news reporting?
He wasn't quoting anyone, Episiarch/Bo Cara Esq. He played a fucking video clip of people in Chicago saying things themselves. If you're going to lie, it's better to lie about one of the lengthy videos Paul posts so that you don't can't be so easily called out on your lies by spending literally 20 seconds on a short video clip.
Also, I'm guessing Paul linked to the short-form video since you throw a bitchy little histrionic cunt fit every time he links to a video whose length exceeds your 35 second attention span. It's almost like you're just a lying piece of shit seething and malding like a faggot all the time.
Reminds me of the Berkley high rise ordinance where a local councilperson invoked Rear Window as defense of high rises and in favor of privacy.
What's so juvenile about Reason's take on illegal immigration is they believe that not only must any illegal immigrant that arrives here be allowed to stay here at ALL cost, but that illegal immigrant has a right to remain within a 3 minute walk of his port of entry, from here until the end of time. And further, if that migrant is sent to a sanctuary political construct precisely because that sanctuary political construct loudly and proudly declared their willingness to take all migrants and care for them, doing so constitutes a "cheap stunt".
Entire population of New York City in the last 29 months.
Eight. Million. People.
Illegally entered the country.
Even if you split them evenly among the four states that comprise the southern border, that would double the population of New Mexico.
"Not sending them somewhere else" is simply not an option.
Cite on Reason's take on illegal immigration?
(The particular controversy the above blog post centers on involved *legal* immigrants.)
No, it doesn't Episiarch/Bo Cara Esq. Even if we accept your retarded premise that these are legitimate asylum seekers, that does not make them legal immigrants (immigrants authorized to enter the country legally), it makes them... legal asylum seekers. Once they receive asylum they would be legal immigrants. It helps when you try to be a pedantic prick that you actually have some fucking clue what the fuck you are talking about, you mindless fucking faggot.
I posted the fucking link to the actual UN Protocol.
You reposted the fucking link to the actual UN Protocol.
I know Mike hates watching videos, but he's supposedly amenable to text links that provide "cites" for him.
This is just more mendacity, which is why Lauren gets the little grey box. It is my devout wish that one day everyone with give Lauren the grey box treatment, because I truly believe most casual visitors here are smart enough to understand that when there's someone who is just utterly and blatantly ignored every time they say something, it's because their idiocy isn't worth addressing.
Everyone here despises you, Mike. They consider you a worthless moron. The drivel that dribbles from your keyboard is less illuminating than random bird shit sprinkled across a driveway.
>>It's wrong to use human beings as pawns
when is your piece railing against everyone and all human history?
Maybe that was Greenhut's way of inching towards the Red Pill, and will one day write a 3000 word thinkpiece on how it's wrong to declare yourself a "sanctuary ____________" when you have literally no intention of following through on such a declaration.
lol. hopes are high.
Shipping pawns to MV in a political stunt is wrong but sacrificing pawns to beat a Russian on the global geopolitical chessboard is just how the game is played.
This entire article is simply moronic.
Greenhut view is so violently skewed from reality that it's hard even to attempt to guess why he wrote this.
It WAS written for Californian consumption, so that may be what's behind the sheer, blinding stupidity on display, but who can really tell anymore given the state California and it's inmates have sunken to.
Possibly the saddest thing is that there is staff at Reason who read this putrescent drivel and nodded along.
so violently skewed from reality
Hmm, he quoted The Bible a lot.
Imagine spending 3 dozen posts simping for Greenhut because of his stellar religious scholarship and then falling back into your fedora tipping reddit teen atheist shtick as soon as it becomes clear that Greenhut maybe isn't actually a stellar religious scholar after all. If you were the kind of person who was capable of shame or cognitive dissonance it would probably be pretty embarrassing.
Really? A lot? 9 words in two quotes, one being a truncated fragment of a verse.
Steinberg..the cosmo enightened Jew..DeSantis the swarthy, crude Italian...yep got it..same same..funny how Reason always goes down this road don't they?
'Parable of the good samaritan' . . . wow, you're witty.
But I am not, and I'm not a good Christian, i'm just an ordinary Christian, and not as witty as you.
Go phch yourself.
"Witty"? Whom are you quoting? Whom are you addressing with your comment?
Since "witty" wasn't in quotation marks in the post to which you are replying, Episiarch/Bo Cara Esq., I'm guessing he wasn't quoting anyone. And since his comment isn't threaded beneath another comment, I'm guessing he was addressing it to the author of the article. Hope that helps, you faux-autistic retarded fucking faggot. You're really batting a thousand today on abortively trying to be a pedant while misquoting people and not being able to follow simple fucking comment threading.
You can't be a MAGA and Christian at the same time.
When we want an expert opinion on Christianity and morality, we seek out the guy who got his original Sarah Palin's Buttplug account banned for posting dark web links to hardcore child pornography, shreek. Thanks for showing up for it.
Can you be someone who thinks Trump was and is an egotistical idiot but who still voted for Trump (twice) because he was for all the still way better than Clinton and Biden and the crap candidates the LP put up (seriously gun-grabber Weld and Johnson who agrees with Bernie 77% of the time or whatever, and Jorgenson who took the BLM knee to the face?)
Maybe Joe and Kamala should just admit that "It's wrong to use human beings as pawns in an apparent political stunt."
I seem to remember huge convoys of illegal migrants funded by US left organizations designed to be timed with the 2020 election, coordinated with coverage from all of the networks excoriating Trump for the "crisis on the border". Funny twist: the convoys were late getting there so the stories kept talking about a border crisis with nobody there.
lol yeah sure okay grandpa, let's get you some food and then off to bed with ya.
Still malding about it 3 years later, shreek? Let's get you some dark web links to hardcore child pornography and off to jail with ya.
Desantis is a MAGA Christian. aka he's not really a Christian.
When I want to know who is or isn't a real Christian, the first person I ask is a guy who got his Sarah Palin's Buttplug account banned for posting dark web links to hardcore pornography, shreek. Thanks for showing up for it.
Pretty sure he's been excommunicated from the MAGA ranks.
What could be more charitable than giving weary travelers an all-expenses-paid trip from where they're not wanted to a city that has declared itself a sanctuary and will welcome them with open arms?
DeSantas every bit as good a Christian as the guy 93% Christian Germany voted in 90 years ago. Hitler defended Positive Christianity, collectivized mystical altruist morality, and Made Germany Great Again. The GOP platform includes many NSDAP planks. Its speeches follow the pattern too: (https://bit.ly/3izsEKj)
Hitler loved Christians so much that he murdered hundreds of thousands of Catholic clergy and tortured tens of thousands more at Dachau. Spot on as usual, Hankie, you historically illiterate subhuman piece of shit.
Shit, did Hank slip his leash and get out of the memory care unit and into the part of the facility with internet access again?
Pick up on the trans-dressing "subhumanator" mystic with the published history books and verifiable identity. Anonymity is Trumpanzee Ku-Klux kowardice. 93% of Germans identified as Jesus freaks in 1932. So "Literacy Testes" here imagines none who elected, supported, cheered, murdered and vandalized for the Jesus-peddling altruist "were really" superstitious Christians. Yawn.
Whose pawns are they, really? The deliberate utterly inhumane way that the Dimbots are breaking the law to fake "compassion" is exposed in what happens when migrants are sent from overwhelmed border states (where CIS often has dumped them) to underwhelmed states and cities that have declared themselves welcome wagons for illegal border crossers.
In a truly libertarian society that Reason Magazine purports to uphold, migration in places where persons and property are respected, would be much more orderly.
But no, Pharisees have to make a big show of dropping a pittance into a beggar's cup, to make a show of caring for the poor guy.
New York City, District of Columbia, Martha's Vineyard, have been exposed as the ones using immigrants as pawns for political and propaganda purposes. They view immigrants as their own voting bloc to ride to ever more statist riches. Hypocrites all. Martha's Vineyard's special PR person in charges of 'welcoming" illegal immigrants (haha fooled you) was the one who coordinated the rapid-fire deportation of the whole lot. Give them a free meal and get rid of them fast. Can't have them inside those big tall walls. And her hilarious justification being that the zip code of millionaires did not have the resources to handle them. Well, why not? Aren't you the ones always demanding higher taxes to pay for more statist services? It can't be to tax the other guy, could it?
It took Mayor Eric Adams a little longer to deport them from NYC, but the process is on-going.
Oh look! An apologist for the drug nazis whose exported prohibition laws and Hidden Persuadors packed South American governments with cowardly USKleptocracy puppets--then wrecked their economies with laws making a crime of trade and production. Go there. Learn the language. Then come back and vote Libertarian.
The parable of the Good Samaritan was about an INDIVIDUAL giving charity, NOT about GOVERNMENTS!!!!! Hypocrites who don't want dirty immigrants messing up their mansions are perfectly fine with piling them in with the hoi polloi. Helps the numbers in polls to keep the crony river flowing with largesse from the common pot, and saying is't to help the poor. Wouldn't be to help the non-profits get more from the public treasury, right?
YOU should read the parable of the good Samaritan. YOU should stop using ILLEGAL activity as political pawns. YOU are FAR MORE guilty of the actions you accuse others of engaging in than they ever will be.
What is particularly Galling is to have non-Christian critcize you're religious practice.
What type of name is, Greenhut?
Not to defend Greenhut's political analysis, but how do you know what Greenhut believes or doesn't believe based on his name? Hmmmm?
Greenhut is a real name. Gall is a counterfeit Klan masque.
You'd have to go a long way to find anyone as un-Christlike as an American Christian.
"As the Gospel of Luke explains, Caesar Augustus mandated a census, thus requiring people who lived in the Roman Empire to trudge to their home towns to be registered for tax purposes. Jesus ended up in a manger after Mary and Joseph failed to find a place to stay."
You might want to look into the historicity of this narrative. To my knowledge there is no trace of such a census, nor would a census have been emburdened with the pointless exercise of returning to one's home town. The Roman Empire was BIG, and travel slow. The whole Gospel narrative is spatchcocked together out of elements of the Isis and Mithra myths, among others.
Even the twaddle about a manger is deeply misinterpreted. That option of accommodation would have been quite luxurious for the time and place.
Gosh. BBC just came out with a story about two out of three little girls who escaped the Holocaust, and Orwell's British Broadcasting Corporation claims they were Jewish. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-tyne-66040197
But Mr Lucile bot here would have us believe that's the Big Lie, and that all three girls were in fact Landover Baptist True Christians™ because Hitler was the real Jyoo! And all those peeeople who saluted and supported him, the Christan 97% of Germany's population, were as gullible as a rioting shrewdness of rabid window-breaking Trumpanzees!
Boy, don't even have to read this story to know Reason's side. Hey, Reason - he is sending them to places that said they will accept them. You know all those Sanctuary cites. It's easy to virtual signal isn't it?
How many immigrants has Reason taken in?