Rent Control 2.0 Looks a Lot Like Rent Control 1.0
Rent control is getting a rhetorical makeover from progressive policy makers.

Once considered the best example of a policy that undermined itself, rent control recently has received a rhetorical makeover from progressive policy makers. They claim smartly designed laws against "rent gouging" can prevent tenant displacement without constraining housing supply or quality, proven consequences of old-fashioned rent control. The trick, they say, is setting a relatively generous cap on rent hikes, exempting new construction, and allowing landlords to raise rents as they please on vacant units.
Rent control 2.0 strikes "the right balance between protecting tenants from egregious rent increases [and] providing landlords with the ability to make a fair rate of return," then–California Assemblymember David Chiu (D–San Francisco) said in 2019, when the Golden State was preparing to follow Oregon's lead by passing the nation's second-ever statewide rent control law.
Just four years later, legislators in California and Oregon are considering legislation that would turn rent control 2.0 back into the more familiar version. That development is a reminder that the rent control ratchet moves in just one direction.
In California, Sen. Maria Elena Durazo (D–Los Angeles) has introduced a bill that would reduce the state's allowable rent hike, currently the lesser of 10 percent or inflation, to the lesser of 5 percent or inflation. The "right balance" Chiu endorsed in 2019 apparently was not the right kind of right.
Oregon legislators, meanwhile, are considering a bill that would lower the state's current rent cap of 7 percent plus inflation to the lesser of 10 percent or 5 percent plus inflation. The state's existing cap gives landlords a lot of flexibility to raise rents in response to rising inflation, which proponents said would not constrain the housing supply. But after several years of high inflation, activists and lawmakers are demanding a stricter standard.
The story in New York is similar. In 2019, the state legislature tightened and expanded a longstanding rent stabilization ordinance covering nearly 1 million apartments in New York City. Now lawmakers have proposed a "good cause eviction" bill that would let tenants challenge any rent increase in court. Rent increases of 3 percent or more would be considered presumptively unreasonable.
Once you concede that the government should regulate rent increases, it's only a matter of time before "smart" rent control policies give way to less thoughtful ones.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Once you concede that the government should regulate rent increases, it's only a matter of time before "smart" rent control policies give way to less thoughtful ones.
It seems to me that promising free shit to idiots is a smart way for a politician to keep his job. It's worked at least for the last century for them.
I don't like "lite" beer. I don't like Democrat-lite (aka RINO's) either. If I want beer, I want one with some body and flavor, and when the weather is cool, I like a stout. The same principle goes for politics - I'd prefer at stout conservative, but I'd rather have an avowed socialist than a wussy who hides behind conservative posturing to vote for larger government, all the while peeing on my leg and complaining about the rainy weather lately.
Same with rent control. Either the landlord owns the building and can charge what he wants for rent, or tell him that he can't ever raise the rent, and if he protests, the city will order him to lower his rents by 10%. It'll blow up in people's faces (but it won't get on mine), and I figure anybody who is damnfool enough to fall for it deserves exactly what they get.
Bought a building in NYC or LA, did you? Sucks to be you, doesn't it? Put another bag of popcorn in the microwave, Mabel.
Its plain that no rent increases should be allowed at all!
And landlords should be forced to accept section 8 vouchers as payment in full.
How about mandatory set asides for a certain percent of undocumented persons.
And please do not forget 5% of all units for the homeless.
And no guns allowed in any rental unit.
Did I Miss anything?
As long as the government controls 'private' property, the details don't really matter, do they?
Nope.
It will be different this time. You know, because like good intentions and stuff.
REAL rent control has never been tried!
This has to work now, all tthe smartest people have studied the issue and worked out all the bugs. Well except for the one little one of governments distorting markets doesn't work.
For sound economic perspective go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
"Progressive" / Aggressive Gov-Guns against citizens lawmakers use gun-threatening law to setup Commie-Housing in the USA.
It wasn't that long ago such a corrupt initiative would've blown the doors off USA citizens. Now the citizenry is nothing but silent Frogs in a pot of boiling water being heated by the Nazi-Left while they read their daily Nazi-Propaganda. If you've ever wondered how the German Nazi citizens got so principle-less and inhumane look no further than what's happening in this nation right now.
You cannot elect [Na]tional So[zi]alist[s] to represent you and expect anything but a Nazi-Empire to get built. Gov-Guns don't make sh*t. They either ensure your Liberty and Justice against other gun packers or they Steal, Kill and Destroy you. Grow a brain frogs.
2.0? Is this really only the second major release?
And what happened to 1.1?
Southern Cali Dems get their money from Hollywood, not Silicon Valley. They don't speak tech
"Rent increases of 3 percent or more would be considered presumptively unreasonable."
Don't pay any attention to the fact that the landlord's operating & maintenance costs have increased by more than the allowed rent increases.