Biden's $42 Billion Broadband Boondoggle
More than 90 percent of Americans already have access to high-speed internet.

President Joe Biden has rolled out his Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) plan, which will be subsidized by $42 billion from the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021. That is an obscene amount of money to invest in technology that will be obsolete by the time it's built.
Nailing down internet service statistics is fraught, but let's look at various reports to get some idea of what's happening.
The stated goal of BEAD is to "connect everyone in America to reliable, affordable high-speed internet by the end of the decade." The billions in subsidies are being divvied up among the states and territories based on the number of households without access to broadband service. The administration estimates that 8.5 million households and small businesses are in areas without high-speed internet infrastructure.
BEAD defines high-speed internet service as a download speed of at least 25 megabits per second and an upload speed of 3 megabits per second (25/3 Mbps). This level of service enables users to check emails, browse the web, Zoom, and stream videos. BEAD defines "underserved" areas as those lacking access to 100/20 Mbps.
A 2022 report by America's Communication Association (ACA), which lobbies for more than 500 small- and medium-sized internet service companies, found that nearly 88 percent of households already live where at least two competitors offer 25/3 Mbps service, and 85 percent lived where at least one operator offers 100/20 Mbps service and a competitor offers 25/3 Mbps service. On current trends, the ACA projects that 95 percent will have access to at least 100/20 Mbps service by 2025.
In its January 2021 14th Broadband Report, the Federal Communications Commission found that nearly 90 percent of Americans had access to fixed terrestrial internet services at speeds of at least 25/3 Mbps in 2015. By 2019, that had risen to nearly 97 percent. In urban areas, those figures rose from 97 to 99 percent, and access to those speeds, even in rural areas, rose from 62 percent to 83 percent by 2019.
Citing more recent data, the technology data and management consultancy OpenVault in its first quarter 2023 report notes that 90.5 percent of American households are already signed up for internet download speeds of 100 Mbps or more.

"As usual, the politicians who wrote the rules for the BEAD and other federal grants are far behind the real-life curve," observes Doug Dawson, the president of communications consultancy CCG. "Grants that allow somebody to build a network that can deliver only 100 Mbps are investing in obsolete technology. By the time those grant networks are constructed, any new networks that deliver only 100 Mbps will be years behind the rest of the broadband in the country."
Providing access to high-speed internet services to the vast majority of Americans was not achieved by spreading around government largesse. The U.S. Telecom Association reports that private companies invested $86 billion in just 2021 (latest figures) to build out their broadband networks further.

In addition, US Telecom's broadband pricing index report notes that the real prices for both the most popular and the highest speed options have fallen since 2015 by 44.6 and 52.7 percent, respectively.
In other words, U.S. private broadband companies are already providing access to faster and increasingly cheaper internet services and, on current trends, will finish the job well before Biden's BEAD boondoggle gets off the ground.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
You oughta see how much he's spent on Ukraine. And FWIW, at least this $42 billion is being dumped in our own backyard and set on fire. We don't even know how much of ~$100 billion went into Prigozhin's bank account in what may just end up being Biden's "Bay of Pigs".
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do.....
For more detail visit the given link..........>>> http://Www.SalaryApp1.com
Just unhappy your fascist friends aren't winning over there?
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,500 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,500 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link————————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
Will the two to five percent that don't want internet be forced to get it so they can reach their goals?
I quit my job and that’s it. I make $120 an hour doing these simple online tasks from home. Also, I make $30,000 a month by working online three hours a day. Also, I recommended q1 for you to try…You won’t lose anything, try the site below and make money everyday…
.
.
.
Further information:>>>>>>>>>>> https://Www.Coins71.Com
No, they just need to pay to have access to it, whether they actually want to purchase and use the service is irrelevant to the narrative.
Where I go camping out in the middle of nowhere, far from public utilities, can I now force the cable company to lay a mile of cable for free so I can have Wi-Fi in my tent? Heck, it's one of the few areas without high speed internet!
and access to those speeds, even in rural areas, rose from 62 percent to 83 percent by 2019
Okay, putting broadband down in rural areas is inherently racist since that is where the "poor whites" tend to live. And they are overwhelmingly Trump supporters to boot.
KamKam should point this out to old Joe when he wakes up from his nap.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
The retard explaining something to a guy with dementia. I'd buy tickets.
He probably thinks she's the maid half of the time.
"If you ain't my maid, then you ain't black."
"...which will be subsidized by $42 billion from the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021..."
Pretty sure that's spelled "slush fund".
After the disaster rural electrification turned out to be -- a well-meaning program, but it mostly enabled a bunch of slack-jawed bigots and half-educated culture war casualties to connect online and lather each other into a QAnon-Trump-insurrectionist-bigot-MAGA mess -- why would any sane person want to subsidize advanced internet connections throughout our desolate, deplorable, can't-keep-up backwaters?
You still trying these desperately grasping trolls?
You've never been to a rural area in your pathetic life.
Excellent work, Mike. I greatly commend your effort because I currently generate more than $36,000 each month from just one simple web business! Even with just $29,000, you may start developing a reliable vs-10 online income and these are just the most basic internet operations occupations.
click here……> workingbitecoin.com
Truthtekker1 Actually, he has never been anywhere with sufficient population to be called rural.
Before you point out farmland is rural, I am aware of that.
Why so angry, Reverend? Did your hayseed husband take away your biting pillow?
Fuck off and die, asshole bigot.
I'm still dead from when we lost net neutrality.
It's honestly just amazing to me that these kinds of garbage spending actions by the federal government are thought of by anyone (other than the corporate and bureaucratic beneficiaries) as a good idea anymore.
bbvnvn
Covfefe
trunalimunumaprzure
As is usual for this topic, the article largely ignores upload speed.
This is bad and wrong.
3Mbps upload is not useful.
20mbps upload is almost useful.
But of course, cable tends to be highly asymmetric. Which means that focusing on making home internet connections actually useful for more than just mindless consumption would cause problems for the cable companies.
3mbps up is fine for most users, its plenty for email, web browsing, streaming video, etc. It's a bit low for video conferencing like Zoom, but I've found that 10mbps is sufficient for that, as well as gaming. 20mpbs is fine for all but the heaviest uploaders or households with multiple users gaming or video conferencing at the same time.
What are you uplinking 4k movies? 3Mbps, as pointed out is more then enough for 90% of people.
Let’s do math – 3Mbps per second, 3600 seconds in an hour – 10,800 Megas per hour or 10 Gigs. Tell me who is uplink 10 gigs.
And you say 72 gigs is almost useful.
I've gamed, Zoom or Teams with 5 mps upload no issues.
YOU never actually upload enough for 3Mps to be necessary.
For sound economic perspective go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
"But that trick NEVER works!" - Rocket J. Squirrel to Bullwinkle Moose.
"Hey, Kamala! Watch me pull a rabbit outta ma hat!" - Sleepy Joe Biden to Eugene Charles Allen (post-mortem)
For once I agree with you. It's a complete waste of tax dollars. We did this shit decades before and the ISPs took the money and ran.
One would think we would learn.
I get paid more than $140 to $170 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $10k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site…
Here is I started.…………>>> http://www.Richcash1.com
42 billion dollars is just a rounding error in the big guy's America.
If it weren't for Starlink, my only option would be an AT&T hotspot with a cap of 25 GB/ month and speeds of 10/3 on a good day. So, my area is definitely underserved. That said, I choose to live in the middle of nowhere and don't expect taxpayers to bring me internet, especially since the richest man in the world has already solved my problem.
It won’t actually do anything, but your kidding yourself if you think most rural people have access to good internet. I have to use a phone hotspot
Technically I could go back to Highesnet, which qualifies as high speed internet but in reality is slow, expensive, and has a very small data cap
Starlink is better, but even more expensive and a waiting list.
Nobody needs more than a 14.4 modem.
Streaming tranny pr0n in 4K is a human right! Not everyone has a local library, you know.
BBB = Biden's Big Blunders
Predictable Democrat. ALWAYS growing the [Na]tional So[zi]alist Empire and conquering the USA.
They don't care if the Socialist curse kills you; as long as they get your $/labor.
The party of slavery.
Why build anything with services like Starlink. I know there are waiting lists but surely they'll be available LONG before this all gets built.
I am not claiming this bill is the cure, but I disagree with your sentiment that this is not a real problem for rural America. We faced similar issues with Electricity and Phone lines a century ago. Go stand on the southwest corner of Pennsylvania and check your cell phone. Then, travel 10 miles in any direction visiting homes to see what then asking what they have access to. Up and down the Appalachian mountain range, I am sure you will find 10's of thousands of people with no or very spotty cell or internet access. I know one school district had many challenges during covid with getting students access to remote learning.
All problems must be cured by "armed-robbery".... /s
I mean Heaven-forbid anyone has to *EARN* their satellite telephone.
If you choose to live in the boonies, don't bother whining about boonie 'issues'.