Nigeria Looks To Reduce State Role in Energy Sector
The new administration plans to end the state monopoly on oil and gas.

Nigeria's new government may reform the country's energy sector to limit the state's role in the production and sale of oil and gas.
According to Reuters, advisers to newly-elected Nigerian President Bola Tinubu recommended that the government reduce its stake in the state-run Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) to a minority position in order to raise $17 billion in revenue. The plan also proposes unifying Nigeria's multiple energy regulators into a single body, noting that "governance and regulatory concerns have eroded investor confidence, diverting private capital needed for the development of critical oil and gas infrastructure."
This move comes after Tinubu announced an end to Nigeria's fuel subsidies during his May inaugural address, promising to "re-channel the funds into better investment in public infrastructure, education, health care and jobs that will materially improve the lives of millions."
Despite the benefits of cheaper refined fuel that Nigerians gained from the subsidy, its tremendous cost—almost $10 billion in 2022—burdened the government and left little revenue for the state to do anything other than pay off debt.
Furthermore, the distortionary effects on prices caused by the fuel subsidy led to the overconsumption of fuel and the diversion of resources from more productive sectors of the economy.
"It's a tremendous step in the right direction in terms of just making the economy function along more free market principles than before," says Marian Tupy, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute. "There's a lot of wastage and environmental damage which could be avoided if prices at the very least reflect market prices."
Past efforts to remove the subsidy have failed. In 2012, President Goodluck Jonathan's decision to remove the subsidy sparked nationwide protests by labor unions until the plan was reversed. "Nigerians have always felt entitled to cheaper gas and that feeling has always trumped every other consideration," says Ebenezer Obadare, a senior fellow for Africa Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations. "They have felt that the least a government, which is otherwise irresponsible, can do for us is to subsidize petrol and make it cheap."
"What tends to happen with state-owned corporations, or parastatals, is that they tend to become a jobs program," explains Tupy. "So instead of trying to get efficiencies or trying to mechanize the processes, increasing productivity, you just hire more and more people, especially from groups that are close to the government."
"Predictably, one of the places where they have a lot of complaints about the removal of the subsidy is not within, but outside Nigeria where people are now feeling the pain, such as in Cameroon, in places where smugglers are always taking cheap oil from Nigeria to sell at increased prices," notes Obadare.
While these market reforms have the potential to change Nigeria's fortunes, the extent to which the state removes itself from the sector will determine the new policy's success. "To have a properly functioning, growing economy and sustained growth over a long time, there are other things that you have to tackle," explains Tupy. "If the money is deposited into a sovereign fund, for example, that would be much better than if it is spent on current consumption."
The Tinubu administration's recognition that state control over the energy sector has led to its current woes is a welcome development.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Look for China to be the huge beneficiary here, as they have heavily invested
Their investment in Biden sure paid off.
cOnSpIrAcY!
Easily start receiving more than $600 every single day from home in your part time. i made $18781 from this job in my spare time afte my college. easy to do job and its regular income are awesome. no skills needed to do this job all you need to know is how to copy and paste stuff online. join this today by follow details on this page.
.
.
Apply Now Here—————————->>> https://Www.Coins71.Com
They bought him for cheap too.
Hello,
Historically, Nigeria has had a significant state presence in the energy sector, particularly through the state-owned Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), which plays a dominant role in the country's oil and gas industry. The government has been exploring ways to reform and diversify the sector to attract private investment and reduce dependence on oil.
One notable initiative is the Power Sector Reform Act of 2005, which aimed to privatize the power sector and attract private investors to improve electricity generation, transmission, and distribution. This reform process has been ongoing, and the government has made efforts to address challenges such as inadequate infrastructure, high transmission losses, and inadequate funding.
Additionally, Nigeria has been exploring renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind, to diversify its energy mix and reduce reliance on fossil fuels. This includes initiatives like the Renewable Energy Master Plan, which sets targets for increasing the share of renewable energy in the country's overall energy mix.
It's worth noting that the energy sector is complex and subject to various political, economic, and social factors, which can influence the pace and success of reforms. Therefore, it would be advisable to consult up-to-date sources or news outlets to get the most recent information on Nigeria's efforts to reduce the state's role in the energy sector.
Only a spambot says hello.
A Reason commenter says GFY
Or a Flounder
"It's worth noting that 'LIFE' is complex and subject to various political, economic, and social factors..." therefore, it would be wise to think for oneself, not delegate that to a coercive govt., not follow "The Most Dangerous Superstition" (by Larken Rose).
The world bank Nigeria summary is interesting:
"High oil prices since 2021 did not boost the performance of the Nigerian economy as has been the case in the past. Rather, macroeconomic stability weakened, amidst declining oil production, a costly petrol subsidy which is consuming a large share of gross oil revenues, exchange rate distortions, monetization of the fiscal deficit, and high inflation. The deteriorating economic environment is leaving millions of Nigerians in poverty. On current trends, with Nigeria’s population growth continuing to outpace poverty reduction, the number of Nigerians living below the national poverty line will rise by 13 million between 2019 and 2025."
The economy is also slated to grow by some 2.9% The report also notes Boko Haram and regional separatist movements. Problems that can't easily be solved or resolved.
On eliminating the subsidy, from Reason, this quote:
"It's a tremendous step in the right direction in terms of just making the economy function along more free market principles than before,"
I don't like the tone of moral injunction here. That it's morally correct and righteous and principled that Nigerians pay the same price for their oil as the free marketers in Manhattan. If Nigerians shouldn't have the freedom to decide what to charge for oil they pumped from under their land, their very homes, then the author should acknowledge this horrific fact and justify it.
Why haven’t you killed yourself yet?
For sound economic perspective go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
My version of Honest Economics is to tell you that nothing, including your blog, has 100 percent market share. No!
Nigeria, please!
Nigeria is temporarily unable to reply, having lost a million citizens to famine in emplacing its present energy policy.
“Nigeria's new government may reform the country's energy sector to limit the state's role in the production and sale of oil and gas.”
They’re instead going to rely on the remittances that the Nigerian princes will receive as soon as we cash their checks and wire them their money, less a small fee.
Probably way bigger than the oil biz if spam over the last 30 years is any indicator. 🙂
Wazzup Nigeria!
Why would the Regime media report bad news?