Police Almost Beat Him To Death. After His Conviction Was Dismissed, Prosecutors Are Recharging Him.
Joseph Zamora spent nearly two years in prison after being convicted of assaulting police officers. The Washington Supreme Court overturned his conviction, but local prosecutors want to charge him again to show him the "improperness of his behavior."

Joseph Zamora was nearly beaten to death by police in 2017. After surviving a medically-induced coma and a monthlong ICU stay, he was charged with assaulting a police officer and served two years in prison. Zamora's conviction was overturned by the Washington Supreme Court last year. Now, a prosecutor is trying to recharge Zamora because he has "not accepted responsibility for his role" in the beating that almost killed him.
The incident occurred in February 2017 when police officer Kevin Hake stopped Zamora while he was walking to his niece's house in Grant County, Washington. The cause for the stop was a neighbor's report about a suspected "car prowler."
A struggle between the two men ensued, which the state conceded "escalated far beyond what should have happened." According to an Appeals Court opinion, during the struggle, Hake "drew his handgun and placed it against Mr. Zamora's ear, temple, and in his mouth." Over his radio, another officer reported hearing Hake say, "Put your hands behind your back, I'll fucking kill you."
According to the Appeals Court opinion, six additional officers arrived on the scene, and they "collectively struck [Zamora] repeatedly, pepper-sprayed him in the face twice," and used their stun guns to stun him three times. By the end of the beating, Zamora wasn't breathing and had no pulse.
Zamora was taken to a local hospital, where a blood test determined that he had methamphetamine, amphetamine, and THC in his system. He was soon transferred to another hospital, remaining in the ICU for around four weeks.
Eventually, prosecutors charged Zamora with two counts of third-degree assault for his alleged assaults of two officers, one of whom sustained some bruising and a "couple small scratches around [his] hand and wrist." The other officer injured his hand by repeatedly punching Zamora in the back of the head.
Zamora was convicted and served nearly two years in prison. However, in June 2022, Zamora's conviction was thrown out on appeal after he argued that the prosecutor in his case had made racially-biased statements during the jury selection process.
The prosecutor in Zamora's case, Garth Dano, had quizzed potential jurors about their beliefs on immigration, border security, and crime committed by immigrants, asking them questions like "Can you make room for the idea that when they hear that 100,000 people come across illegally a month, and of those we've got people from countries that—countries on our list that aren't even allowed in the country are part of that group?"
The Washington Supreme Court unanimously reversed Zamora's conviction, ruling that while Zamora is not an immigrant, these statements were racially biased.
"Contrary to the State's assertion, no legitimate, relevant trial purpose supports the prosecutor's questions or statements," wrote Judge Charles W. Johnson. "Rather, the apparent purpose of the remarks was to highlight the defendant's perceived ethnicity and invoke stereotypes that Latinxs are 'criminally; and 'wrongly' in the country, are involved in criminal activities such as drug smuggling, and pose a threat to the safety of 'Americans.'"
According to documents obtained by the Seattle Times, following the Supreme Court's ruling, Zamora asked when he could file a tort claim, which is necessary to file a civil rights lawsuit against the city and its police department. Zamora also reportedly left a voicemail to Grant County Prosecutor Kevin McCrae "demanding" that he charge the officer who beat Zamora with attempted murder.
McCrae is now attempting to prosecute Zamora again for the same alleged crime—seemingly in retaliation. While McCrae has refused to comment on the reasoning behind his attempt to retry Zamora, a draft response to a bar complaint against McCrae after he decided to recharge Zamora obtained by the Seattle Times contains an explanation.
"It is clear to me that Mr. Zamora had not accepted responsibility for his role in this incident," McCrae wrote. "While there is no more jail time available in this case, any conviction would still count as criminal history on his offender score, would have an effect on the sentence for any future crimes Mr. Zamora may commit, and hopefully impress upon Mr. Zamora the improperness of his behavior."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
How dare he assault a police officer’s fist with the back of his head!
You have to laugh at the sheer mendacity of that.
Puts me in mind of the man in Ferguson who was charged with destruction of property after his blood allegedly went onto a police uniform.
I basically make about $14,000 to $18,000 a month online. It’s enough tocomfortably replace my old jobs income, especially considering I only workabout 10-13 hours a week from home. I was amazed how easy it was after I triedit copy below web….
.
.
GO HERE —————->> https://Creatdoller.blogspot.Com
I vaguely recall a case from a few years back where a man was charged with destruction of government property because he bled on the uniforms of officers who beat him.
I have made $18625 last month by w0rking 0nline from home in my part time only. Everybody can now get this j0b and start making dollars 0nline just by follow details here..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://Www.pay.hiring9.Com
Sorry, but a court statement including the word Latinx tells me everything I need to know about the justices. Leftwing loons in the majority so of course Emma is sucking their collective (and collectivist) dicks.
Yeah, that was glaring. This must have been before the DNC memo went out to their members telling them to shut the fuck up and stop using the term.
Don't forget they also included a Prince Harry favorite, '...unconscious bias...' too. An injustice has been done to the people of that State by a woke if not totally insane State Supreme Court. The appellate court upholding the verdict did a masterful and professional job and presented a plain and simple 'just the facts and law' presentation. Of course they should ignore this tripe and retry him.
Yeah. Every year when the new ballots come out, I see three or four candidates stumping for State Supreme Court,,, ALL of then unopposed. Makes me sick. That used to be a good court. I'm surprised we didn't hear ol Robbie the Fergie chime in on this case. This one is just the cup of tea he likes.
Seems to me once Mr.Zamora heard the clear words "I'm gonna effing KILL you" all bets were then off. At that point it was do or die for their intended victim.
It also is in language quite clear that Mr.Zamora has been once put on trial for certain actions. The US Constitution guarantees he can NEVER be put on trial again for that same set of actions. So this dirty copper is on a vendetta, one at which he failed last go-round. He should/must be blocked from having another'go" at this man.
If he had been acquitted, or his conviction overturned "on the merits", that would be true. But instead, it was overturned because of improper questions posed to potential jurors, essentially making his first trial a mistrial. So double jeopardy doesn't actually apply. Nevertheless, the facts of the case argue strongly against renewed prosecution. As you said, Seems to me once Mr.Zamora heard the clear words “I’m gonna effing KILL you” all bets were then off. At that point it was do or die for their intended victim. Seems that way to me too.
While IANAL, it seems that the case was tried in front of a jury (properly or improperly seated) and once the case started, jeopardy attached (in this case literally, as he did 2 years). Jeopardy attaches when the jury is sworn. (See Downum v. United States, Crist v. Bretz, and Martinez v. Illinois.) It was a quick look up.
The conviction was reversed on a due process violation.
The state is entitled for another attempt to punish Mr. Zamora.
I have made $18625 last month by w0rking 0nline from home in my part time only. Everybody can now get this j0b and start making dollars 0nline just by follow details here..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://www.Apprichs.com
A reversed conviction means the trial didn't happen, so he can be tried again. It happens often - but not so much when the original case was this bad.
Double jeopardy applies. The trial was completed with a guilty verdict, he served 2 years before the conviction was overturned.
The reason why is immaterial.
The case is not yet over so it is not double jeopardy. The Appeal was part of the original conviction; the supreme court ruled that the first trial had procedural flaws and send the case back. It has never been fully resolved. Hence no double jeopardy.
No, they should not retry him. They should try the officers involved. And compensate him. I trust the Washington Supreme Court that there was impropriety, even if they’re “woke”. It’s irrelevant to question prospective jurors about immigration so as to filter out non-conservatives. The libertarian position is never give benefit of the doubt to the government, give benefit of the doubt to the individual, limit the power of the government over the individual which includes limiting the power of the police. The individual gets benefit of the doubt, not any agents of government arrayed against the individual. Governments have mass murdered a lot more people than individuals acting on their own behalf have. The libertarian position is to limit the power of the police.
That the dude was put in ICU for 4 weeks when the cops had negligible injury makes me suspect excessive force, based upon that alone. That seems like reasonable cause to investigate, at least. If they investigate, they could find probable cause to charge the officers.
I don’t care if the Washimgton Supreme Court is woke. They were right to overturn the conviction.
It's irrelevant to this case to question jurors about immigration, but it could prejudice the jury, which is a reasonable fear..
The courts in Washington State have become increasingly leftist. It’s gotten pretty bad.
The article doesn't mention video, but dollars to donuts says the assault on LEOs charge is a CYA by the cops. For which a corrupt, scumbag prosecutor managed to convince twelve morons to convict by appealing to prejudice.
But, yeah: whine about "Latinxs."
That popped out to me like a big red flag. It makes me think the judges decision had nothing to do with whether Zamora was improperly tried, he was just a liberal offended by a statement about illegal aliens. Not saying the decision was necessarily wrong, but it sure sounds like it was made for the wrong reason.
werd
I guess it's a good thing that the state is now open about totalitarian actions.
It’s been that way since shortly after Jay Inslee became governor.
For sound economic perspective go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
Suckmyballs.substackz.com
Now, a prosecutor is trying to recharge Zamora because he has "not accepted responsibility for his role" in the beating that almost killed him.
Had he not been there, the police wouldn't have been able to beat him into a coma! The whole thing is his fault, really.
That's exactly what I was thinking as I read through that. How dare Zamora not accept responsibility for being there, because if he hadn't been there then this never would have happened.
I wonder if this prosecutor says the same to rape victims - because under what seems to be their logic then if they had not been present then the rape would never have happened. Doesn't even matter what they may have been wearing - how dare they even exist!
Just lay back and enjoy it.
The problem is Emna refuses to provide any backstory except the blatantly anti-LE position. Reason does it so often you cannot tell real abuse from false narratives from what they write.
Here’s backstory – https://www.krem.com/article/news/state/washington-justices-blast-racist-questioning-former-grant-county-prosecutor/293-566309bf-0878-4baf-86c1-0d181cb69c9f Looks to me like some of those officers should be prosecuted for something, at least excessive force, or assault causing great bodily harm.
After all, repeatedly bashing an officers hand with the back of your head is pretty heinous.
Next time he'll probably put gunshot residue on the cop's hands.
While there is no more jail time available in this case, any conviction would still count as criminal history on his offender score
Offender score? Jail time available?
*pulls out constitution*
Let's see here:
"nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb"
So the state is going to charge him with a crime twice even though they can't punish him if they convict just to rack up a meaningless and entirely arbitrary "score" that they can then use to double punish him later when he inevitably gets pulled over for a broken tail light?
Exactly the point I was going to make–but you beat me to it.
But if he as a really good–aggressive–attorney, he can make hay from this. Your Constitutional citation is exactly right. Therefore, to violate that is, well, an unconstitutional act. It’s highly doubtful that the threat to re-charge him would be the work of a single person. Therefore, [drumroll…] by definition, it is a “conspiracy to deprive him of his constitutional rights.”
To remind the reader, this is one of the major charges that brought down the KKK in the Selma case back in the ’60s. If they’ve already charged him, the case is Zamora’s–game, set, and match. All he’s got to do is have it filed. Which can be done qui tam. That puts the ball squarely in the feds’ court.
I don’t know what kinds of shoes McCrae likes to wear, but I’m sure they’re very nice shoes. I wouldn’t want to be in his shoes just now.
Does convicting him, of an offense that was overturned, so as to "count as criminal history on his offender score", constitute as placing him "in jeopardy of life or limb"?
So, no double jeopardy, by wanting his prior bad acts to be part of his criminal record.
I AM Making a Good Salary from Home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing, under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it's my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone. go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart ......
SITE. ——>>> cashdollar12.com</a
Legally, they aren't trying him twice. The first conviction was vacated, so it legally never happened. Even though he served his sentence already.
If SCOTUS hasn't seen that argument yet, maybe they will intervene. But the outcome has to be that it's double jeopardy.
It is NOT Double Jeopardy. A Criminal Conviction being VACATED is NOT the same as an ACQUITTAL.
Libertarians and leftists celebrate joyfully when the police state is thwarted as it was in this case. Conservatives (and you can tell who they are from the comments on this article) scream in frustration upon learning that a victim of police violence achieved a small win in court, a win that will never restore his health or return to him the 2 years of freedom taken away from him.
Ahh yes. Just ignore all the leftists cheering the shooting of an unarmed woman. Political prosecutions. And 5 year sentences for non violent J6 actors.
Such an intelligent argument.
If you are a part of a crowd that breaks into a building, you are guilty of a crime, even if all you did was follow the people ahead of you in and wander around. If that building was the US Capitol and the election was being ratified in the Senate, they are going to charge you at the high end of the available prison sentence, and rightly so.
The January 6 protesters tried to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power from one administration to the next and broke into the building to do so. (If they had stayed outside the fence, chanting on their bullhorns, they would have been fine.) It is very confusing to me that people continue to deny that that was a very bad thing to do.
Ahh yes, look at all the times JesseAZ brings up St Ashli, as though he were some redneck Cato, in preference to - and hence deflecting from - addressing the instant case.
I note that in general JesseAZ stays away from articles covering police or prosecutorial abuses, unless it's about J6. You will search in vain for a post where JesseAZ condemns these violent cops, except when it's about St Ashli, or when he wants to criticise those who do condemn violent cops for not being as outraged as him over St Ashli's fuck-around-and-find-out death.
Well, just cuz the conviction was thrown out, doesn't mean he's not guilty. They will have to retry this guy without the illegal immigration language.
Just because the conviction was overturned doesn't mean he's innocent. Without the illegal immigration wording, they will have to retry this individual. https://drift-boss.co/
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM