Georgia Arrests 'Cop City' Bail Fund Organizers for Fraud, Money Laundering
As with other cases in recent months, Georgia law enforcement has used specious classifications to charge nonviolent protesters with domestic terrorism.

After the Atlanta City Council approved the construction of the Public Safety Training Center, a police training facility, in a patch of city-owned forest in 2021, activists mobilized against the project, which they derisively call "Cop City." A group called Defend the Atlanta Forest camped out in treehouses to prevent construction. Some have even turned violent, throwing rocks and Molotov cocktails at police.
But the police response has come under scrutiny in recent months, including the police killing of a protester that was later ruled a homicide and numerous arrests of activists and protesters for nonviolent offenses.
This week, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI) and the Atlanta Police Department (APD) arrested three activists—Marlon Kautz, Adele Maclean, and Savannah Patterson—on charges of money laundering and charity fraud. According to a GBI press release, the agencies "executed a search warrant and found evidence linking the three suspects to the financial crimes." The Intercept described it as "a heavily armed…SWAT raid," seemingly corroborated by a photo shared on the blog Welcome to Hell World.
The charity in question is the Atlanta Solidarity Fund, a bail fund that has supported activists arrested while protesting Cop City. Kautz, Maclean, and Patterson are the three listed officers for the Network for Strong Communities, of which the bail fund is a part.
Bail funds are nonprofit organizations that pay bail bonds for arrestees who could not otherwise afford it. This allows people who have been charged but not convicted of a crime to go home rather than sit in jail awaiting trial. Some conservatives find bail funds controversial, stipulating that such agreements let "murder and rape suspects get out of jail while awaiting trial." But judges are the ones who set bail, and in Georgia, some crimes are ineligible for bail. Anybody offered bail in Georgia has, by definition, not been charged with any of the most egregious offenses.
Georgia's actions this week seem retributive. The charging documents are not yet available, but arrest warrants provided to Reason by GBI Public and Governmental Affairs Director Nelly Miles are underwhelming.
The warrants hang on the contention that Defend the Atlanta Forest is "a group classified by the United States Department of Homeland Security as Domestic Violent Extremists." Law enforcement has used this claim for months, charging 19 protesters in February with domestic terrorism charges even though nine were only accused of misdemeanor trespassing. According to Grist, "a DHS spokesperson denied that the federal agency classifies any specific groups with this term."
But the warrants justify the arrests based on this supposed classification, apparently deeming any payments or reimbursements as material support for terrorism. In one example, Maclean was reimbursed $228.29 to "move the jail support hotline to a new plan" and add "two (2) phone lines." In another, "Patterson was reimbursed via her personal PayPal account" $6,657.59 in 26 payments over nearly two years. "These payments were for various expenses such as gasoline, forest clean-up, totes, covid rapid tests, media, yard signs and other miscellaneous expenses."
Perhaps these uses violate the law on how a bail fund can use the cash it raises. But the arrest reports explicitly use support for forest protesters as justification for prosecution. Just like deploying a SWAT team to look for evidence of financial crimes, using domestic terror charges for operating a bail fund seems particularly egregious.
In a statement after the arrests, Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp said, "These criminals facilitated and encouraged domestic terrorism with no regard for others, watching as communities faced the destructive consequences of their actions." Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr, whose office also participated in the case, further clarified that the "arrests are about the violence that occurred at the site of the future Atlanta Public Safety Training Center and elsewhere."
But the arrest warrants contain no such allegations of violence against Kautz, Maclean, or Patterson. Georgia law enforcement is once again using group affiliation and a specious "violent extremist" classification to justify treating an entire swath of people as domestic terrorists.
Lauren Regan, executive director of the Civil Liberties Defense Center, called the raid and arrests "an extreme provocation," in a statement to the Atlanta Community Press Collective. Regan added, "Bailing out protestors who exercise their constitutionally protected rights is simply not a crime. In fact, it is a historically grounded tradition in the very same social and political movements that the city of Atlanta prides itself on," including the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I feel certain everyone is being honest here.
So much bullshit in this article I just don't have time for a point-by-point.
I'm glad Reason is against charging people for group affiliation, now maybe they can look at other similar events such as anyone in DC on Januaray 6
Hey now. We are to ignore the DoJ going after GoFundMe accounts for those people.
Let’s not forget about the Canadian government going after people who funded the trucker protests.
It was worse than the holocaust!
I have made $18625 last month by w0rking 0nline from home in my part time only. Everybody can now get this j0b and start making dollars 0nline just by follow details here..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://www.apprichs.com
Noticed that too. Reason seems to support all protests...EXCEPT 1/6. Odd.
Trespassers will be shot on sight ; hang the sign. But fuck all these domestic terrorist charges.
I am underwhelmed by sympathy for antifa fucknuggets.
I fully share your sentiments re: Antifa, BUT:
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7515521-william-roper-so-now-you-give-the-devil-the-benefit
As J6 protesters go, so go BLM and ANTIFA.
Huh, I suspected it, commented about it, and it appears UC Davis has come to the same conclusion.
I'm no physicist [nor lawyer nor Doctor] but a cow naturally growing its cells until they can be harvested into a Porterhouse probably uses the same amount of energy as it takes to grow the Porterhouse in a vat (per porterhouse cell).
Sure, but it's a question of where that energy comes from. Not that I think "the sun, into grass, into ribeyes" isn't likely to be pretty darn efficient.
Hunh. Never thought of it that way. Cows are solar powered. 😀
Everything is solar powered.
Anaerobic bacteria hardest hit.
I never thought of it like that. I like it!
Just sent that out in an email to my chat group this morning, too.
I guess they'll need to keep working on the bug-loaf that the WEF wants everyone to eat (well, they want us to eat it, not them of course, they'll stick with their surf-and-turf and champagne).
Some conservatives find bail funds controversial
Eat shit and die Joe Friday, you partisan hack. How many J6 protesters couldn't get out on bail?
Homeboy must have died from the Fauci Ouchie, he hasn't posted here in months.
Not missed.
We ignore J6 prosecutions here. Too local. Unlike Atlanta which a global issue.
Like the riots that didn’t happen in 2020.
"Non-right-wing website fails to promote J6 conspiracy thinking, right-wingers butthurt".
If it were up to you, Ashli Babbitt would have been hailed as the patron saint of tourism by now.
Liar lies, film at 11.
And assholes like you are just thrilled she was murdered, right fuck-face?
You know they get off on it.
Hey shrike. What conspiracy theory are you referring to?
Libertarians are referring to no bail, solitary confinement, 5 year sentences for non violent actors, illegal bank records requests from BoA, seditious conspiracy theories without evidence of any type of plans, withholding tapes, getting cell phone data of everyone present, multiple false arrests for people not even there, dozens of confidential informants,, undercover cops on sites, planting evidence for defendants, using CIto get defense plans of defendants, etc.
I will even add in giving a medal of honor to a cop killing an unarmed woman since you brought it up.
So what are you referring to?
Still not shrike you fucking liar.
Long sentences for non-violent crimes are not unknown – particularly if they are associated with other actions that are violent.
You lot keep promoting a big lie about the relative peacefulness of the J6 riots, ignoring even actual video. I am reminded of an ex-colleague who insisted that St Ashli was acting peacefully and when I directed him to the video showing what she was actually doing when she was shot, refused to watch it. Conspiracy thinking doesn’t require there to be an imagined explicit conspiracy. It is a state of mind concerning events, including denial of the evident narrative.
Anyone who actually believed your account would think that there were largely peaceful crowds moving into the Capitol as part of their constitutional rights, were all calmly and correctly directed in by Capitol police through the regular public entrances, but such violence as occurred was exclusively conducted by FBI informants and government agents provocateurs, Capitol security ushered politicians away from these peaceful civilians because they over-reacted to a non-existent threat, and thereafter hundreds of peaceful civilians were imprisoned in the Lubyanka.
FWIW I've noted before the outrage of the right at the J6 rioters being treated just as badly as other prisoners on remand - because up until then you lot never gave a shit about prisoners on remand.
Shrike, where did I claim they were totally peaceful? Even the first thread at J6 i call out the violent protrstors and how they should be prosecuted. But they should be done so at similar lengths and costs as other riots. I have been consistent on this for every riot. Unlike you who supports unequal treatment based on political party.
5 years for non violent acts is not common. It is unique to the modern DoJ. Especially in regard to J6. At no other time for any other riot has the DoJ spent tens if millions trying to find everyone involved, generally only seeking out violent perpetrators. But shrike, you love disparate execution ofnlaws that benefit the left.
I have never called J6 perfectly peaceful shrike. I have commented multiple times about there being two groups of people, one at the east entrance, one at the west. The riot was only on one side. See the Straka video. Amazing you accuse others of not watching videos shrike. Lol.
So in summary. Shrike supports political prosecutions. He ignores bad actions by the government targeting people he dislikes. He creates strawman to push a point. He is generally uninformed.
Shrike is a soros paid moron who defends the left at all cost. He will even mock an unarmed woman shot by cops if it benefits the left. He will evoke holocaust comparisons if it benefits the left. Shrike is a modern retarded leftist.
“ You lot keep promoting a big lie about the relative peacefulness of the J6 riots, ignoring even actual video.”
There were 10’s of thousands of people protesting around the capital and less than 500 who entered the goddamn building and even less than that that actually committed any act of violence or property damage. There is ample video proof of this. Contemporaneous video shows the police firing tear gas into a peaceful crowd (something you would have lamented and been outraged about just two months before J6).
So yeah, it was a mostly peaceful protest, not a “Big Lie”. Especially in relation to how you all promoted the previous 8 months of protests.
Oh, and Libertarians have been the only people that have been consistent about the immorality of prisoners on remand and I’ll be damned if smug assholes like you are going to pretend like you’ve ever cared about it unless it was a group you favored.
Good day bruv!
If it were up to you, Ashli Babbitt would have been hailed as the patron saint of tourism by now.
Don't be ridiculous.
Not addressing the point.
It directly addresses your attempted mockery of sainthood.
Oh fuck you guv.
George Floyd, patron saint of inner-city drug abusers, petty thieves, and BLM protesters around the world.
But at least the cops who murdered him got prosecuted, which is more than the Capitol Keystone Cop who seems to have seen his chance to shoot someone without consequences and took it.
Yeah, how dare the cop shoot a white woman at the front of a violent mob breaking down windows to get in further, rather than a black guy on the street.
If breaking a window is a Capital offense to you a lot of BLM and leftist rioters should be dead at this point.
That's a bit of a mic drop...
Because skin color is the most important thing, eh?
"As with other cases in recent months, Georgia law enforcement has used specious classifications to charge nonviolent protesters with domestic terrorism."
Rings a bell, doesn't it?
I don't think "nonviolent" is an apt description for these folks.
"Sometimes nonviolent"?
"Mostly nonviolent"?
Seems like some on the left who cheer the police state for going after right of center people are finally realizing it will eat them too. Poor babies.
It's not like they were speaking during their allotted time at a school board meeting or anything heinous like that.
“”Bailing out protestors who exercise their constitutionally protected rights is simply not a crime.”
Strange, I didn’t know building treehouses on land that wasn’t yours and throwing rocks/molitoves at people was Constitutionally protected. I love people who cheer when those right of center like the Jan 6 protesters are arrested and rot in jail get their panties in a twist when the shoe is on the other foot. They want the right to riot without the consequences but that is how they have been trained the last several years.
Seems weird to see libertarians argue that property crimes are not crimes.
...killing of a human, that was later ruled a homicide (killing of a human).... or e.g. '....death of a human, that was later ruled a death (death)....'
The rest of article makes that sound intelligent.
Yeah that's just silly. Nobody ever denied it was homicide. Nobody denies that Ashli Babbitt's death was a homicide but the guy who killed her was declared a hero.
Don't you just hate it when the left gets treated like the right?
So when the government makes up thinly-veiled pretenses to go after some people it's good because they deserve to be taken down no matter what, but when the government makes up thinly-veiled pretenses to go after some people it's bad because they are on the right side of history.
All depends on which side you're on, unless you're on the side that says government should be held to a higher standard and use actual probable cause and not political attacks on the opposition.
I support the right to peacefully protest, and I'm not sure why a libertarian (or really anybody) would support this mass deforestation to build a $90 million, 85 acre, seemingly militaristic "police training compound." I'm very surprised by the comments here.
query for you: Why would a libertarian (or really anybody who isn't a brain-dead "liberal" or "progressive") have a problem with a police-training facility? Or for that matter, with a military-training facility?
hint: There's nothing "un-libertarian" about maintaining law & order (police) or protecting the nation from external enemies (military).
Good luck working it out!
"...the police killing of a protester that was later ruled a homicide..."
Of course it's homicide. That doesn't mean it's not justifiable. All murders are homicides; not all homicides are murders. There's the matter of criminal intent.
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM