Jail Officials Refused To Give Him His Heart Transplant Medication. Days Later, He Was Dead.
A lawyer for the family speculates that jail officials balked at the medication's high price.

Dexter Barry was arrested last November following a dispute with a neighbor. Five days later, he was dead, after jail officials refused to give him necessary medication for his heart transplant.
According to The Tributary, a news outlet based in Jacksonville, Florida, Barry was arrested on November 18, after a neighbor reported him to the police for allegedly threatening to "beat him up" following an extended dispute over Wi-Fi. While the two never physically fought, Barry was nonetheless arrested on a simple assault charge.
During his time in police custody, Barry—who had received a heart transplant in October 2020—frequently insisted that he needed to take specific daily medications to prevent his body from rejecting his new heart. According to body camera footage of the incident, Barry told one police officer at least seven times that he needed this medication to survive.
When Barry appeared in court the morning after his arrest, court transcripts show that he once again requested access to his anti-rejection medication.
"I am on medication," Barry told Judge Gilbert Feltel. "I just had a heart transplant, and I haven't taken my medicine all day since I have been locked up, and I take rejection medicines for my heart so my heart won't reject it, and I'm almost two years out…. And the medicine that I am taking, it's like 30-day prescription that's like $2,400."
"OK. Here's what I will do, Mr. Dexter," replied Feltel. "I am going to simply set a bond in your case of 503 and add the additional condition of no violent victim contact." While Barry was released on November 20, his son and a lawyer for the family say that Barry never received his medication while in jail. By the time he was released, he had missed at least five doses.
Despite resuming his medication, Barry's health declined over the next few days, and he died on November 23, just three days after being released. A pathologist hired by Barry's family reported that his cause of death was his body's rejection of his heart transplant.
Andrew Bonderud, the family's lawyer, speculated that jail officials didn't obtain Barry's medication due to its cost. "Records from jail will likely show they made a note of it," Bonderud told The Tributary. "[The Jacksonville Sheriff's Office (JSO)] recognized it's an extremely expensive medication and how disgusting if it turns out that this was a business decision for the JSO, that they would rather not pay for the medication. They would rather risk death over a business decision. It's one of the most outrageous cases I've ever seen in this city of JSO misconduct."
While the pathologist declined to blame Barry's death solely on jail officials' refusal to obtain his necessary medication, it's clear that JSO officers were, at best, reckless with Barry's health—and at worst, contributed to his avoidable death.
"The police officer could've gone inside and got his medication," Barry's son told The Tributary. "This man is telling you, my heart needs those meds. A two-minute walk would've saved his life."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Something appears to be missing. Why didn't they just pick up his medication from his house or let someone else bring it to him?
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,000 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link—————————————>>> http://Www.JobsRevenue.Com
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM
Agreed. Not sure you can be guaranteed that the local drug store has this prescription in inventory.
Google pays $300 on a regular basis. My latest salary check was $8600 for working 10 hours a week on the internet. My younger sibling has been averaging $19k for the last few months, and he constantly works approximately 24 hours. I'm not sure how simple it was once I checked it out. This is my main concern............. GOOD LUCK.
.
.
BONNE CHANCE…............................ https://Www.Coins71.Com
Exactly. Something else appears to be going on. When the judge heard about it he promptly let the guy go. I think this might be the family looking for a payday.
If you think the family deliberately withholding the medication to get a payday is more likely than cops deliberately withholding medication to be cruel, then that says a lot about what your family thinks about you.
I have made $18625 last month by w0rking 0nline from home in my part time only. Everybody can now get this j0b and start making dollars 0nline just by follow details here..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://www.apprichs.com
They routinely do not listen to the people they arrest. Everybody seems to have the "it's not my problem , the next guy gets to deal with it " kind of mentality. It looks like they just passed the buck continuously until somebody said "ah, I don't want to deal with it ... cut him loose and let him deal with it himself." By then , too late.
No proof, just what I suspect happened.
I think you are right. It is probably hard to listen if you are jail staff, but you have to do it and you have to sort out the BS from important stuff. That did not happen, and Dexter Barry died.
Procedure. He could be hiding illegal drugs in his prescription bottle and they can't test it so they cannot use it. Stupid but so is the "local PD provides drugs to inmates" headline that looms in the possible outcomes.
How hard would it be to pick up his meds and take them to the pharmacy where the prescription was filled and let the Pharmacist identify the medication? Typical Union mentality. It's safer to do nothing, than to do something that might get you in trouble.
It would have had to be the authorities picking it up. Letting someone untrusted bring pills into a jail would be out of the question -- who could be sure what the pills were?
This is tragically far from an isolated incident. Check for news articles on your local jail.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
.
.
.
Just open the link————————>> http://Www.Pay.hiring9.Com
Did the family bring his medication to the prison? Did the prison then refuse to give it to him? Did the cops refuse to get it when he was arrested?
They shouldn't be required to buy his medicine but should have done their best to work with the man and his family to get it to him. If they were just too lazy, incompetent, over worked...than yes the prison should be held accountable for his death.
Actually, yes, they were (and should be) required to provide his medicine once they took him into custody - just like jails are required to provide food, sanitation and other necessities of life. It's true of prisoners of war and it's true of criminal prisoners - the captor is absolutely responsible for the safety of all those in his custody.
And yes, the jail in this case is far more culpable if they failed to take even the meager steps of getting some of the medicine from the person's own stock.
So if you're on an expensive medication you get a pass on the crime you commit because it's too expensive to treat random thugs and degenerates, got it.
No, the captor has to go get the medication. It's not "too expensive", it's your obligation.
Feeding 'em is pretty expensive too. Why should the jail/county have to waste money buying groceries for you scofflaws. Jut let the family bring them food.
Oh, wait. Can't tell what may have been "slipped into" those mashed potatoes. For your own good, we can't let that stuff in.
Sucks to be you, doesn't it?
While Barry was released on November 20, his son and a lawyer for the family say that Barry never received his medication while in jail.
This is not a surprise. I read about this all the time. Cops and jailors routinely refuse to allow inmates access to prescribed medication. The usual excuse is that the prisoner is faking whatever disease or condition they claim to have.
Really? Why didn't the son bring the medication to the jail? Jails are not pharmacies that keep all kinds of medication on hand especially specialized medicine like that
It's not clear from the article where the son lives or if he even knew his father was in jail.
Jails in general do not allow people to bring things in. If you want something nice for an incarcerated friend or family member, you put money on their account to buy from the secured commissary.
I'm sure the turn-keys have "qualified immunity", which means "You shouldn't have done that. Don't go and do it again. But you are a privileged person, so there's no penalty or punishment involved. But don't you do that again, you hear?"
But have Ben Crump and/or Coling Kaepernick (aka Al Charpton in cleats) weighed in yet?
They're busy deleting "Bike Karen" tweets and issuing groveling, public apologies.
What if they had? They would most likely make criticisms of how the police handled his jailing that we would all agree with.
Im making over $13k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.last month her pay check was $12712 just working on the laptop for a few hours. This is what I do,
...
VISIT THIS WEBSITE HERE...................>>> http://www.works75.com
I'm kind of surprised they didn't. It would have given them a perfect excuse to snoop around and see if they could find anything else to charge him with.
Maybe the family didn't want the cops going in the house because there WAS something incriminating to be seen.
Such as a non-prescribed cheap plastic flute? AKA a DANGEROUS medical implement of mass death and destruction?
To find precise details on what NOT to do, to avoid the flute police, please see http://www.churchofsqrls.com/DONT_DO_THIS/ … This has been a pubic service, courtesy of the Church of SQRLS!
And that is exactly why they cannot.
Andrew Bonderud, the family's lawyer, speculated that jail officials didn't obtain Barry's medication due to its cost. "Records from jail will likely show they made a note of it," Bonderud told The Tributary. "[The Jacksonville Sheriff's Office (JSO)] recognized it's an extremely expensive medication and how disgusting if it turns out that this was a business decision for the JSO, that they would rather not pay for the medication.
Serious question on procedure here, how was Barry paying for the $2400 medication before he was arrested?
Umm, health insurance?
How did he pay for the transplant operation? If he or his family could afford hundreds of thousands for that (or is it millions now?), $2400/month would not be a problem. If they received some sort of private charity, it would be a remarkably stupid charity that paid for the operation but not the drugs required afterwards.
OTOH, if Medicare paid for it, that's the way Congress set it up. Part B pays 80% for the operation and hospital stay (and often the hospital and surgeons figure the other 20% is uncollectable and forgive it.) But Part C doesn't pay for drugs, it only assists you in buying Medicare supplement insurance to cover drugs.
I'm very sympathetic to this man and his family. Having said that, the claim that he was refused medication due to the cost is only made by the family's attorney and is in fact contradicted by a family member who points out that the medication was already available. This is pure bureaucratic indifference. Guy gets arrested maybe justified maybe not. Tells the cops he needs his meds. They have orders to take him into custody and decide to let somebody else deal with it. Shifts change and somebody else has to deal with this guy. The jailers don't have the wherewithal to go get the meds. Shifts change. Next shift has to deal with the guy and figures the judge will figure it out. More shift changes and nobody really knows what's going on anymore but the guy finally gets in front of a judge who has another 20 cases to hear before he goes home. In the end if the meds were already available the family could have at least tried to supply them. The attorney is not making the claim that they did. Yeah the system should have done better. But there's plenty of blame to go around. These Reason stories really don't really answer any questions.
Too many details missing to give a clear picture. In writing class we were always told "show, don't tell." This should be even more important for news writers than it is for fiction writers.
There are too many gaps here where it feels like information has been omitted to push a single narrative.
He was in jail 2 days and out for 5 before dying. Not sure if that much of a gap is enough for rejection to set in and cause death. I'd be interested in knowing when/if he went to the hospital. If that was immediately after getting out then it does support the notion that the system is at fault.
What was his interaction like with the police? Was he arrested at home and asking to get the drugs before going off to jail? Did anyone capable of getting them for him know of his arrest?
I do find it hard to believe that the police would be callous in this situation if it could be easily remedied. The judge seems to have immediately given him the chance to get his drugs at home.
A better and more complete timeline is required to place fault (though I am leaning towards the cops being culpable.) It is hard for me to believe that they would allow all the resources involved in a heart transplant to be wasted needlessly
I do find it hard to believe that the police would be callous in this situation
You're naïve. The police are routinely murderously callous. But I agree that in this particular case we don't yet have enough information to make a judgement.
Organ rejection is a progressive process. It could have started the first time he missed a pill. Two days is definitely long enough to start a fatal cascade.
Say the guard bringing hamburger to the jail kitchen got distracted and left the hamburger out for two days. Would it be OK to put it back in the fridge for a few days, then cook and serve it?
From the headline, I expected an article about Jim McDougal.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_McDougal
His mistake was letting them know it was a matter of life or death. If he'd told them it was for blood pressure they might have given him the medication.
I think it also illustrates the somewhat schizo nature of the justice system. Some places, people who actually assault people are arrested and released the same day, while this guy who never actually did assault someone is arrested and held in jail for several days for just presumably an angry threat
This is a common misconception.
Assault is actually the threat of violence.
Battery is the violence itself.
Ha! Way wrong!
verb
make a physical attack on.
"he pleaded guilty to assaulting a police officer"
Similar:
hit
strike
physically attack
aim blows at
slap
smack
beat
thrash
spank
thump
thwack
punch
cuff
swat
knock
rap
pummel
pound
batter
pelt
welt
cane
lash
whip
club
cudgel
box someone's ears
clout
wallop
belt
whack
bash
clobber
bop
biff
sock
deck
slug
plug
knock around
lay into
do over
rough up
quilt
smite
sexually assault
abuse
molest
rape
interfere with
noun
1.
a physical attack.
"his imprisonment for an assault on the film director"
Similar:
violence
physical violence
battery
mugging
grievous bodily harm
That is the popular definition. In English law, and I assume in US common law, “assault” means causing the victim to apprehend immediate unlawful violence - it's not the violence itself.
Note that it's not just a threat to constitute "assault" under the law, it's a threat that a reasonable person would find credible and worry about. If you're perceived as just blowing off steam, it's not assault. If you're obviously physically incapable of carrying out the threat, it's not assault.
That's why it's uncommon to prosecute for just the threat; it's so much easier to prove the threat was real when it came with a bit of battery, or something like brandishing a firearm.
FWIW one of the first cases I studied at college was Tuberville v Savage - which made it clear that the threat has to be immediate, and hence Savage's later defence to his stitching Tuberville up a treat did not stand.
When the government takes an individual into custody the government assumes responsibility for the individual's health both physical and mental health. Dexter Barry and Lashawn Thompson are examples of failure of the governments to meet its responsibilities.
This article is woefully incomplete. The issue seems to be just as much one of negligent jailers as out-of-control pharmaceutical prices. If this guy was too poor to afford meds on the outs then the jail is off the hook. But if someone of means commits a crime the jail has to pay the high prices to keep them alive. Anyone see a problem here? While it is easy to take shots at the jailers it is not too hard to understand their position. They have budgets they have to adhere to. What a shame if rich people used this as an excuse to be set free.
It would not be the case that Dexter Barry would not have access to the medication he needed. A heart transplant is a difficult and expensive operation. The hospital performing the procedure would have made sure that Dexter would have the medication he would need to keep the heart going and to avoid rejection after surgery. These kinds of procedures usually include a case worker to do follow-up. This was a failure of the jail staff.
I notice an oddity that of the regular posters JesseAZ, Mother's Lament, R_Mac, and Elmer Fudd the Chud, none of them saw fit to post on this thread.
Are you suggesting it's the same guy out with the flu ?
No - more likely IMO is they all know that from their claimed positions they should support the family, but really they don't because the "us" in this case are the jailers, and the "them" is the deceased; better to avoid the subject altogether than have hypocrisy exposed.
It is of course possible that one or two of them just didn't bother to open or comment - I don't open every article nor comment on it - nor should anyone be required to comment on every new article posted; but when 4 of the most active right-wing posters do not do so, it's not unreasonable to speculate that they have discreditable reasons in common.