Texas Tries To Rein in False Accusations of Child Abuse
The state legislature passed a law to limit anonymous reports to its child abuse hotline.

A bill designed to limit false accusations of child abuse is now heading to Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott's desk—one of several attempts to reform the state's Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS).
The bill was introduced last November by Texas state Rep. Valoree Swanson (R–Spring). The bill—which has largely gained support along partisan lines—will ban anonymous reports to the state's child abuse hotline—instead requiring all callers to provide their name, phone number, and address. The bill also requires reporters of abuse to include "the facts that caused the individual to believe the child has been abused or neglected and the source of the information."
While anonymous reports of abuse and neglect to the state's hotline are prohibited under the legislation, the identity of those reporting abuse will remain confidential, except to DFPS and law enforcement officials. These measures, according to the bill's supporters, are specifically designed to limit false accusations of child abuse.
"As Texans, we need to ensure the safety of our children in any situation. HB 63 will allow for more accountability and protections for those involved in potential CPS and DFPS investigations relating to neglect and abuse," state Rep. Kevin Sparks (R–Midland) told The Texan."Without this necessary reform, both agencies will struggle to verify reports and can complicate the issue with hours of wasted time on false accusations."
Opponents have argued that the bill would deter reports of actual child abuse. Kate Murphy, director of child protection policy with the nonpartisan nonprofit Texans Care for Children, told the Texas Tribune that, in 2022, about 1,000 reports of the 12,473 total anonymous calls were found to be substantiated.
"Unfortunately, if this bill were to pass, those 1,000 children would be left to continue experiencing abuse and neglect or worse," said Murphy.
But there's little reason to think that the bill will prevent factual reports of child abuse or neglect from being made. Not only is it a fairly large leap to assume that genuine abuse will go unreported if callers have to give their name and contact information, but the bill still allows individuals to make anonymous reports to 911 or any other local or state law enforcement agency. If these reports are referred to DFPS, the agency is directed to undertake a preliminary investigation to determine whether there is any corroborating evidence for the claims, which can include home visits and interviews—hardly an abdication of responsibility.
Raising the bar for making an allegation of child abuse or neglect is probably a good thing. Child protective services agencies sometimes investigate parents who have simply let their children walk home from school by themselves or allowed them to play outside unsupervised. In 2019, only 16 percent of investigations uncovered a substantiated incident of abuse or neglect.
That said, intervention is obviously justified in cases of genuine abuse, but there's little reason to think requiring that reporters identify themselves to a child protection hotline will prevent real abuse from going unreported.
HB 63 is one of several recent efforts to reform the way Texas investigates reports of child abuse and neglect. HB 730—which is also headed to Abbot's desk and would require DFPS workers to notify parents of their rights, including the right to refuse searches, drug tests, or interviews with children—will strengthen the rights of parents subject to a DFPS investigation. If officials want to conduct a search anyway, they'd have to show probable cause to obtain a court order.
"Unfortunately, the DFPS and Child Protective Services can often be used as a weapon. A lot of times we see this in divorce cases," Sparks told the Tribune. "We probably all know of a circumstance where a family was needlessly traumatized because of an anonymous tip that was ultimately found to be false."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Texas Tries To Rein in False Accusations of Child Abuse
Huh. Then how can "concerned citizens" snitch on their neighbors and call CPS on them on the suspicion that they are raising a transgender child? I don't think they thought this one through.
I am making a good salary from home $1500-$2500/week , which is amazing, undera year earlier I was jobless in a horrible economy. I offer thanks toward Godeach day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay itforward and share it with Everyone, Here is website where i started this……………..
.
.
For Details►———————————————➤ https://Www.Coins71.Com
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM
That's a hell of an intellectual leap there, Jeffy.
Not from what I see in the comments.
So you've seen other such leaps from Jeffy previously.
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do.....
For more detail visit the given link..........>>> http://Www.jobsrevenue.com
That too, yes.
Everywhere drunky looks, drunky sees just what he's looking for!
To be completely fair the subject of CPS is probably a bit triggering for drunky. He lost custody of his children because his "cunt" wife reported his sexual and physical abuse and got a restraining order and full custody when it was substantiated. Drunky likes to pretend he was hacked during the 9 or 10 different times when he told us this story. In vino veritas, they say.
I have made $18625 last month by w0rking 0nline from home in my part time only. Everybody can now get this j0b and start making dollars 0nline just by follow details here..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://www.apprichs.com
Huh. cytotoxic sees a red state doing something good and has to turn it into a fact-free pro-groomer screed? I don't think he thought this one through.
in 2022, about 1,000 reports of the 12,473 total anonymous calls were found to be substantiated.
“Unfortunately, if this bill were to pass, those 1,000 children would be left to continue experiencing abuse and neglect or worse,” said Murphy.
iF iT sAvEs OnE LiFe!!1
In other words, 92% were unsubstantiated.
But now 100% of those that were will fall through the cracks!
Yes 1000/12,473 is a SHOCKINGLY low rate of substantiation.
The phones should have been turned off immediately after seeing those numbers.
> iF iT sAvEs OnE LiFe!!1
Senator Snorkleblowr to introduce the IISOL Bill before the state senate, news at eleven.
If they reporters are actually concerned, they will comply with the new law.
The old constitution had a provision guaranteeing the right to confront your accuser.
Oh, well, put that where free speech, the right to keep and bear arms, and the requirement of probable cause for a strip search in the airport are now kept.
Sixth Amendment? Who needs it.
"responsible CPS entirely more difficult" - Gov. Greg
I have a VERY simple proposal to "reign in false accusations of child abuse". Very simple.
in 2022, about 1,000 reports of the 12,473 total anonymous calls were found to be substantiated.
OMG. shut it all down. shut it down now. wtf. You have a 1 in 12 accuracy BY YOUR OWN ACCOUNTING? which means it's far, far less than 1 in 12.
This is one of those situations where I think the advocates on both sides are telling the truth but that they are largely talking past each other.
Yes, this law will deter some reports of actual child abuse. It won't deter all 1000 of the substantiated reports but it will deter some of them. On the other hand, the fact that only 1000 out of over 12,000 were substantiated means that there were over 11,000 reports that were not substantiated - but every one of those unsubstantiated reports triggered its own investigation with its own costs, efforts and harms to children and families. Detering the harms that are generated by fraudulent reports is a valuable goal in its own right.
It's possible that some of those reports were inconclusive or uninvestigated rather than finding innocence, but yeah. This is like 8% accuracy; I would argue that such a low figure doesn't constitute probable cause for the agency to take any action like insisting on a home visit or an interrogation of the child.
I would argue that MANY of the 1000 that were substantiated were actually false. I have PRESENTED exactly as much evidence as you have.
I quit working at shop and now I make 65-85 per/h. How? I'm working online! My work didn't exactly make me happy so I decided to take a chance on something new after 4 years it was so hard. Here’s what I do http://www.topearn7.com
"Opponents have argued that the bill would deter reports of actual child abuse." Yes, that should be the DEFAULT position! American justice was originally founded on the notion of protecting the innocent. Blackstone correctly said, "It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer." If you don't have the guts to take some risk to protect an actual victim of child abuse that you honestly believe is being abused then, in addition to being a miserable, cowardly excuse for a human being, you don't deserve to be trusted with filing a complaint in civilized society.
Go ask Daniel Penny what being a big brave vigilante gets you, you fucking donut. How many kids have you protected from abuse, tuff gai?
Really? You’re using Daniel Penny as an example of filing a telephone message complaint about an abused child? But to answer your question, physicians and other medical professionals are required by law to notify officials of suspected child abuse, and we’re not allowed to hide behind anonymity when we do so. It’s none of your freaking business how many times I have had to report cases like that. Also, I served as a medic in the Army three years regular and one year active reserve evacuating accident victims in Hueys and, although I don’t consider myself to be a “guff tai” I’ll gladly compare that with your service record any time.
I don’t understand what is your point.
The article did say in the last paragraph that reports of abuse are used as a weapon in divorce cases..
With 12,000 reports and only 1,000 substantiated, it seems like the great majority are deliberately false reports.
Likely by vengeful spouses during divorce.
Now at least they have to leave a name and address.