Biden's Student Loan Pause Overwhelmingly Benefited Wealthier Americans
Is this what equity looks like?

It's been more than three years since federal student loan borrowers had to make regular monthly payments or face accumulating interest—and it's now more clear than ever that the student loan payment "pause" overwhelmingly benefited more affluent Americans.
Student loan payments and interest were temporarily put on hold by former President Donald Trump in March 2020, and that pause has been extended six times during the past three years. In November, President Joe Biden extended the pause until June 30 of this year—giving the Supreme Court time to review his proposal to forgive up to $20,000 in student debt for federal borrowers.
From the start, it seemed fairly obvious that student debt relief would generally benefit wealthier Americans since individuals from middle- and upper-income households are more likely to take out loans in pursuit of college and graduate degrees. The past three years have demonstrated just how inequitable the student loan pause has been, as a new report from the Brookings Institution makes clear.
"The payment pause especially benefits high-income households because they tend to have larger student loan balances—and therefore higher payments," writes Sarah Turner, a professor of economics and education at the University of Virginia and the author of the Brookings report. "Without the pause, households in the top 40% of the income distribution (corresponding to family incomes above about $80,000) would account for about 60% of student loan payments but only 41% of borrower households. By contrast, households in the bottom 20% (corresponding to incomes below about $30,500) account for about 13% of borrower households but only 5% of payments."
Turner points out that the student loan pause is "appreciably less progressive" than Biden's proposed student loan relief plan—even though that, too, would overwhelmingly benefit affluent Americans—because it applies to all federal loans. She also warns that many low-income borrowers might struggle to make payments when the pause ends, as their economic circumstances might have changed considerably in the three-plus years since they were last expected to make a student loan payment.
"Overconfident promises from the Biden administration about the likelihood of loan forgiveness have likely made existing relief programs less salient to borrowers," Turner writes. As such, many borrowers may not be prepared for the bills that could be coming this summer if the Supreme Court strikes down Biden's student debt forgiveness plan. "Failing to prepare at-risk borrowers for these outcomes is irresponsible and may inflict more harm on those who have already spent years struggling with burdensome student debt," warns Turner.
Indeed, the final result of Biden's refusal to restart federal student loan payments (and his politically charged promises to forgive a significant amount of that debt) may be to crush the very low-income borrowers that the president has talked so much about helping. Is this what equity looks like?
There's no doubt that the White House would try to pass the buck if that comes to pass—when Biden extended the student loan pause in November, he said he was only doing it because "Republican special interests and elected officials" had sued to block his debt relief plan. But no one forced Biden to overpromise student debt relief and then overreach his executive powers in an attempt to deliver it. In fact, no one forced him to keep extending the student loan pause again and again, either, even long after the pandemic's economic effects have subsided.
Biden's extensions of Trump's student loan pause serve as another example of how well-intentioned policies can spiral out of control without a clear exit strategy. Some student loan borrowers may have needed temporary assistance during the height of the pandemic, but transforming that temporary solution into a lengthy pause on student loan payments has mostly benefited those who didn't need the help in the first place.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Who did you strategically vote for Eric? He ran on this yet you seem perplexed.
The student loan payment pause benefited the Democrats' voters and foot soldiers. If you're thinking any differently, Boehm, you're an idiot.
You mean the program started by Trump?
You honestly can't be this stupid. It has been paused under Biden who keeps extending it dumbass.
Remember when Trump banned offshore drilling?? I will never forget!
Earning money online is very easy nowdays. Eanrs every month online more than $17k by doing very easy home based job in part time. Last month i have made $19754 from this job just in my spare time which is only 2 hrs a day. Very easy work to do and earning from this are awesome. Everybody can get this right now and start earning cash online by follow instructions on this webpage.............
SITE. —> usdtwork
Remember that businesses were closing and laying people off. No one knew what was going to happen next. When Biden took over maybe his first pause was okay but after that the rest was pure pandering. he brags that he created 12 million jobs ( most were just people going back to the jobs that already exited) and we keep hearing their are 10 million openings. Why would we still have to delay loan repayments?
And certainly why would forgive any of this debt?
Oh yeah! Votes.
Told ya! 😛
#OBLsFirstLaw
#LibertariansForBiden
Is this what equity looks like?
Boehm looks across the room to the medicine cabinet where the Red Pills are stored. But it's just a furtive glance.
*audience gasps*
"Equity."
"...well-intentioned policies..."
And Boehm wonders why people think him just another poorly closeted Marxist.
I dont get why they continue to use the well intentioned epitaph for democrat policies. Very telling.
I earned $25000 last month by using the use of working on-line most effectivefor five to eight hours on my computer and this turned into so clean that i inmy view could not receive as proper with earlier than working on this internetsite. in case you too need to earn this kind of huge coins then come and be apart of us. try this internet-website on-line ...........
This Website➤---------------➤ WORK AT HOME
All their personal friends are progressives. They'd rather keep those friends than call their policies horrible.
Why? It is mandatory.
Stalin just wanted to modernize the Soviet workforce and be more efficient about food production and resource allocation. I assure you that all of his policies were well-intentioned. They just suffered a few unexpected and completely unforeseeable setbacks.
"Stalin just wanted to modernize the Soviet workforce and be more efficient about food production and resource allocation."
"I assure you that all of his policies were well-intentioned."
Really? You couldn't have thought of a better example? Stalin committed genocide through mass starvation programs. He ordered all Soviet POW's captured by the Germans to be sent to Gulag's for espionage, all farmer's who took food to feed their starving families to be executed or sent to the Gulag (see the Gulag Archipelago). The only worse person you could've chosen as "modernizing their nation's workforce" is Mao.
Mao was a Chinese patriot who came up with brilliant plans to uplift all Chinamen and teach them to properly respect their elders.
You're kidding, right?
Please add something like " /sarc " after such comments or at least let us know if the source of that "information" was Xi, Biden, Obama or who?
Thanks!
Lol.
Actually, this is what fascism looks like.
>>Is this what equity looks like?
the fuck is equity? just stop, bro.
Equity is the portion of your mortgaged house that you actually own. That is, market value minus what it would take to pay off your mortgage in full.
Or do you mean "equity" as used now by Regressives instead of "equality", almost 80 years after Orwell coined the phrase "Some animals are more equal than others"? "Equity" in the political sense is an utterly meaningless word replacing "equality" as a smokescreen for policies that make one group "more equal" than others.
Yes.
It is what all progressivism and left wing politics looks like: pretending to help others while enriching themselves.
I earned $25000 last month by using the use of working on-line most effectivefor five to eight hours on my computer and this turned into so clean that i inmy view could not receive as proper with earlier than working on this internetsite. in case you too need to earn this kind of huge coins then come and be apart of us. try this internet-website on-line ...........
This Website➤---------------➤ WORK AT HOME
This what "progressivism" when carried too far looks like. Of course I personally prefer the progress that occurs when government gets out of the way of progress, but progressives have not always been wrong.
This what “progressivism”
when carried too farinevitably looks likeI don’t think the 1900s and 1910s progressives were all bad. But the things that those progressives were complaining about have long been fixed at this point.
You do understand that the whole "made the trains run on time" is the rhetorical equivalent of "not all bad."
So if you offer it as damning faint praise, fine. But if you think it makes them in any way acceptable you are mistaken.
They are avowedly and most certainly anathema to individual liberty.
Private automobiles, good roads, and privately-owned and operated airlines get you where you’re going much faster than a passenger train, no matter how punctual. The assumption in “He made the trains run on time” was that propping up an obsolescent technology was a proper role for government. This was something shared by Fascism and 1920’s Progressivism, because these were just different versions of the same movement. So were Communism, socialism, and FDR’s “liberalism” – all tried to substitute centralized government control for the free market, and all failed.
The softest fail was the softest version of this movement, American Progressivism, renamed to Liberalism only because FDR needed something to distinguish his platform from Hoover’s. It merely turned caused mass impoverishment by turning yet another market Panic into a decade-long Great Depression. The others also spawned mass murder by starvation, governments that ran tanks over and machine gunned their own people, a remarkably bloody world-wide war, and Gulags and concentration camps.
Ah, another progressive libertarian.
Aka enemy of the people
Either you accept the premises of progressivism or you don't. If you do, it will necessarily be "carried too far". That's because progressivism can never fulfill its promises, so its policies always keep escalating.
Progressives have not always been wrong, but statistically, they are wrong so often that the ideology is a failure. And that's not an accident, that is intrinsic to progressivism.
Spot on...
Progressives have been wrong for 100 years. When asked what they’ve done for us they point to the 40 hour work week, which, OK, bully for them, but that was literally DECADES ago.
Literally nothing they’ve done or advocated in my ENTIRE lifetime (I was born in the 1970’s) has been any good for me or America, at all.
The one thing they COULD do, antitrust, they’ve basically abandoned, as it turns out that they’re perfectly fine with monopolies and the merger of corporate and state power, as long as THEY’RE in charge of it all. And that demonstrates that they don’t really care about principles at all, just power.
Progressives didn't come up with the 40 hour work week.
But they are also not consistently wrong. They are smart people and they have plenty of good ideas. Denying that makes you look foolish.
The problem is that they are trying to use government to implement those ideas, that they also have plenty of bad ideas, and that the people who have the ideas aren't on the hook for the consequences.
No, progressives have pretty much zero good ideas.
Abortion on demand on the taxpayer dime, disarm the citizenry, trans all the kids by force against the will of the parents, let men dominate womens' sports, force everyone to eat bugs and drive unaffordable vehicles while they turn a profit on their government edicts, and let all the criminals loose and jail the law-abiding who have the gall to defend themselves.
No. They are wrong, evil, and have literally NOTHING of value to offer. The only people who look foolish are those who would defend them and that agenda in any way, shape, or form.
It's what casually and openly buying votes looks like.
Oh, and it's what spending tax money without any appropriation looks like, too.
I'm guessing you didn't realize that the alternative to Trump was going to be this bad?
I dunno ... Trump was pretty bad ...
LOL
Leftists are literally cancer.
Final 1/2-year yes. Cherry-picking isn't a reasonable thought process.
Yes. Just another page in the Buying Votes Playbook.
Anyone who read the democrat party platform knew it would be this bad.
They told us right out loud.
This student loan fiasco is more of a mess than Biden's planned evacuation from Afghanistan was. Both Trump and Biden played a part in both, but in both cases Trump's half-baked plan was stellar in comparison to Biden's complete and utter bumbling.
Why we elect ancient fools is a wonder. Trump was elected and it a complete joke, but the Democrats didn't want to be outdone by the incompetence of the Republicans. Instead they double-downed and elected Biden who make Trump look like the rational choice.
Trump was a rational choice against Hillary. Trump was also a big middle finger to the Republican establishment in the primaries, which is why they hate Trump more than the Democrats. (Never Trumpers). I am an independent, but the real problem is the voters, they vote red or blue, and could care less about the person or policies. I don't even care about personality, it is all about policy to me when it comes to voting.
The problem is what is done to anyone crazy enough to run by the media and incumbents. Look at the mud slinging, and now the political harassment. What sane person would want that? You have to be a narcissist at the very least or more likely a sociopath to want to run for President. So those are the people we get.
'Equity'. Uh-huh.
When does Motherjones make a hostile bid for Reason?
"Surprise, surprise, surprise". -Gomer Pyle USMC
The wealthy aren't taking out loans for college. It's interesting the study pegged the figure as over $80,000 which hardly qualifies as wealthy. In fact a very large number involved here are young Black people, first of their families to go to college who are struggling to make enough after college to pay for the loans.
LOL
"In fact..."
If it is indeed a "fact' then you should have no problem providing the evidence that "a very large number involved here are young Black (sic) people".
They are referring to college grads making over $80,000 and up to $125,000. I don't believe race makes a difference on ability to pay back a loan if they are making 6 figures.
Headline; Students get to use Gov-Guns and commit "armed-robbery" on their neighbors... One Free Commit-a-Crime pass given to the *special* people to enslave the 'icky' ones.
Because that's what the Democrat Party is *always* all about. Which [WE] gang gets to RULE! It's gangland politics 101. And anyone has to wonder why politics is going this direction and the nation can't get along and is dis-assembling?
What to do when the entity put in charge of ensuring Justice-for-all turns and becomes an “armed” gang of criminal thugs.
Half of the world’s population is impacted by the Top Women’s Health Concerns, making it an important subject.
https://health4uz.com/the-top-womens-health-concerns/
Women live, on average, ten years longer than men.
Why don't we focus on men's health concerns until that inequality is addressed? Increase funding for men's health, decrease funding for women's health?
For that matter, why don't we focus on achieving gender parity in the shitty jobs that men are doing right now?
So let me get this straight: because some young person decides to get a college degree in gender studies, queer politics and the science of trans, then can’t find a job because who would hire an idiot like that in the first place and in the second place would most likely end up causing trouble in the work place trying to stir up trans politics and screaming about white male misogyny, transphobia and racism. How many tens of thousands of college grads with absolutely worthless, meaningless college degrees, that offer nothing to a prospective employer? Now senile old Joe wants the American taxpayer to bail them out just because, well you know the real reason why….to buy the vote of young people. In this way the taxpayer, will be forced at gunpoint , to cover for the people who made totally stupid decisions to get an absolutely worthless degree, that has nothing to offer to anyone, whereas the owner of said college degree might as well use it to wipe their ass with it. Don’t fret little sparkle fart, the American taxpayer will bail your worthless ass out.
The sleepy old fogey .
I believe that we should always meet the needs of the younger generation. After all, providing support to students through educational services such as https://writemyessaytoday.us/ is an important aspect of ensuring the academic success and personal growth of students. By offering various forms of support such as academic advising, tutoring, counseling and career services, educational institutions can create an environment conducive to student success and well-being.