These Members of Congress Have a Revolutionary Idea: Write and Pass a Budget the Old-Fashioned Way
A return to so-called normal order wouldn't fix all of Washington's many problems, but it would be a step in the right direction.

Amid the ongoing fracas over the federal government's debt limit and possible debt default, there's a group of 63 lawmakers pushing an idea that's so simple it might be revolutionary: have Congress do its job.
The bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus—made up of 31 Republicans and 32 Democrats—has reportedly crafted a debt limit proposal that calls for Congress to return to so-called regular order for the passage of annual budget bills. That means the dozen appropriation bills that make up the federal budget would go through the full congressional process, including committee hearings and individual votes for each, rather than being rolled together in the massive omnibus packages that Congress has relied upon in recent years.
According to a draft proposal from the caucus published Wednesday by Axios, a return to regular order would be one of several changes the lawmakers in the group would demand as part of a debt ceiling deal. They're also asking for the creation of a new fiscal commission to make recommendations on stabilizing the federal government's dangerously high levels of debt, and the adoption of budget controls (similar to those that were in place between 2011 and 2018) to limit future spending increases.
If those terms are agreed to, the group's framework would raise the debt ceiling to a level that won't be reached until after 2025—in other words, until after the next election.
On their own, those proposals won't solve America's serious fiscal challenges. But they would be a series of good first steps toward taking the mess seriously and would avert the potentially catastrophic debt default that looms over everything in Washington right now.
While the Problem Solvers Caucus is mostly made up of centrist members of Congress, there's at least some overlap with the right-wing House Freedom Caucus, whose approval is essential to getting any proposal out of the chamber right now. In January, as part of its effort to hold up the election of House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R–Calif.), the Freedom Caucus demanded that McCarthy allow lawmakers to offer amendments to spending bills on the House floor—a practice that has been effectively banned by recent speakers from both sides of the aisle.
That's not quite the same as a return to "regular order" but it's the same sort of idea. Both would empower individual lawmakers to exert greater control over the budget-making process. It would, in short, let legislators be legislators. As it stands now, most rank-and-file members of Congress have little say in the process and can offer only up-or-down votes on the finished product.
That so many observers have identified this problem as being fundamental to what's broken in Congress ought to mean something. Shortly before retiring at the beginning of the year, then-Sen. Pat Toomey (R–Pa.) told Reason that the "dysfunction" caused by the lack of regular order "is the biggest thing that I would hope my colleagues would fix." Former Republican-turned-Libertarian congressman Justin Amash for years has been advocating a return to regular order as a first step toward fixing Congress' broken budget process.
It's probably right to be skeptical that the Problem Solvers Caucus' proposal will gain much traction right now, amid a partisan battle over the debt ceiling. McCarthy on Wednesday said the House will pass a bill next week raising the debt ceiling until mid-2024, rolling back federal spending to last year's levels, and placing stricter work requirements on food stamp and Medicaid recipients. It's unclear whether he has the votes to pass it, but it's pretty clear that the package won't go far in the Democratic-controlled Senate. President Joe Biden, meanwhile, has been steadfastly refusing to negotiate with McCarthy over the looming debt limit.
Everything is pointing toward a continued partisan stalemate as the leaders of the House, Senate, and White House try to bang out a last-minute deal to avert a major problem. And that does a great job of illustrating why Congress would benefit from a committed return to doing things the way it is supposed to do them.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I’m remodeling $960 per day using my phone part-time. I’m presently on my fifth record for $27,000 and each one I’ve made has been from replicating and pasting photographs off the internet. This industry helps the United States generate more nd34 money every day for certain goals and tasks, and the quality earnings are just amazing. More information may be found . . In this article————————————— https://salarycash710.blogspot.com
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do.....
For more detail visit the given link..........>>> http://Www.jobsrevenue.com
Does anyone in congress now even remember how to do this?
Yes, that’s why they’ve avoided it for so long. It would take work, like actually reading thousands of pages of bovine excrement which is not something a congress critter is willing to do. I mean it’s literally less than 12 percent of congress crites. What hope do you have of anything coming of this if people don’t literally beat on the doors, flood the phones, and storm the email boxes of congress critters? Oh wait, that will probably get them charged with twiddling with congress, or exercising their fundamental rights in violation of tear-wrist DHS excreta or some sort.
In a Congress so divided a 63-member group could go a long way in moving legislation if they wanted to do so. Their plan has two strong points, the first is to pass the debt ceiling without a protracted and useless battle. The second is to address spending where it really matter in the budget process system. Removing the debt ceiling rhetoric and eliminating the end of term omnibus spending bill would both be real progress.
You start with the assumption that raising the debt ceiling is the right thing to do.
You are wrong.
^This. There is no truly legitimate reason why not raising the debt ceiling by a certain date has to be a major catastrophe, but the democraps are guaranteed to do everything they can to turn it into one, the samexway they leveraged the mostly harmless Wuhan boogie-woogie flu into a major crisis. It's literally the only thing that they truly excel at.
The "Barrycades" will get dusted off and put up again, the Tressury Department will be ordered to delay Social Security payments even though they don't have to, the Obamite scum will do everything they can think of to try to inflict maximum pain on people (again).
The only solution that could save the country requires the democrat party to end. There is no other way.
certainly the party that is now what are called democrats
Here's the thing. The contracts have already been signed. The services have already been provided. But the government hasn't paid its suppliers yet, so if the debt ceiling isn't raised, people won't be paid what they're owed. And then few people will be willing to work with the government anymore, so everything will become more expensive for the government.
CGP Grey made a great video about it.
https://youtu.be/KIbkoop4AYE
The problem is, the debt limit doesn't restrict what the government can buy. It only restricts the government's ability to pay for it.
Then Biden better okay ball. There will be no $6.8 trillion budget.
‘Play’
I agree. Even if it, in the end, it results in even a little change, it is a step in the right direction. Maybe a hundred-mile journey can be started with a single step....
Is this like when Bush I agreed to a time ax increase now in exchange for promised cuts later? The cuts that he never got and the tax increases that doomed his presidency?
Their plan has two strong points, the first is to pass the debt ceiling without a protracted and useless battle. The second is to address spending where it really matter in the budget process system.
That's a nice plan. What makes you think it'll survive to step 2? What's the incentive?
Just more bloviating to try and convince people that the government can be trusted again, i.e. we will take 15 votes instead of one to add another trillion to the debt.
Not even a step in the right direction. The only thing that would make even a tiny difference at this point would be to block any further raises in the debt ceiling for any reason. If they claim that they would then have to shut down the Federal government, let them! If they only shut down popular functions like Social Security and Medicare payments – let them! The Federal government should not be allowed to spend a single penny more than they take in in revenues ever again. THAT would be “a step in the right direction” and “a good start.”
And social security recipients would storm the capitol; this time they would probably even pose a real insurrection, with or without the encouragement of the capitol police.
Sign me up!
And social security recipients would storm the capitol
May look something like this.
That is exactly what I was hoping it was going to be!
Thank you.
Good news. But do we really need a new commission, can't they just use simpson bowles and then just ignore that like last time and save some money?
pan. et. circenses.
It's cute you think there could ever be a fix to the dysfunction in congress.
it would be a step in the right direction.
Not giving is taking, slowing the rate of a budget increase is cutting, and reducing the velocity at which you cast yourself off any given fiscal cliff and into the ever-growing chasm of debt is stepping in the right direction.
"The deficit growth has slowed down!"
I don't remember where I heard that from, but it fits.
Why is anyone assuming that the DNC and the GOP actually want the problems with Congress solved? That would require actual work, rather than soundbites.
They are catering to a lunatic mentality. Both parties suffer the delusion that they can vote away the other party and assume total control. It's like thinking you can be first on the freeway -- no matter how fast you go, someone somewhere will be farther ahead of you. The only guarantee is that the faster you go, the sooner you will have a car wreck.
They like what they have. They have 6 Trillion Dollars a year to give away to friends and family.
there's a group of 63 lawmakers pushing an idea that's so simple it might be revolutionary: have Congress do its job.
The rest of Congress had a good laugh over that.
"Do our jobs? Pffft! What do you think this is? The private sector?"
LOL +100000000000000...
If Congress was actually willing to do its job they wouldn't have delagated their power to the executive branch and ABC agencies.
Convenient. Sounds like just another excuse to kick the can while claiming to have "done something."
Don't hold your breath
After 30 years, what makes these critters remotely believable? Are they are all kinda new critters? Or just old shit wrapped up in shiny colors
Here are the real culprits -- those of us who are still registered as DEM or GOP. Both parties are ruled by their extreme lunatics. As long as we remain registered as DEM or GOP, the party will carter to the 1%-15% lunatics and ignore the other 85%.
I finally practiced what I preach and re-registered as Independent. I did NOT register with the other party since both are ruled by extremists. When enough people leave both parties, then they will pay attention to the center, i.e. doing their job.
I do not mean to form a third party -- right now the extreme element of every political party controls the policy. Look at Israel. There is no rational reasons for what the ultra right is trying to do.
Once we are unknown until we emerge from the voting both, we are unknowns. Think of its as the Schrödinger's Cat approach to politics. They never know what our votes will be until after we've voted and they open the ballot boxes.
"Congress would benefit from a committed return to doing things the way it is supposed to do them"
What do all congressmen SWEAR an oath to when they start their JOB????????
If they cannot even *pretend* to work within the Peoples Law over them why would anyone believe anything else they promise to do from them???? They cannot even obey the most SERIOUS law over them.
"The bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus—made up of 31 Republicans and 32 Democrats—"
Looks like 32 Democrats will be getting primaried by their own party in 2024.