Brickbat: Prudish Policing

The British government has proposed a bill that would make it illegal for men to whistle or make a pass at women on the street. The Protection from Sex-Based Harassment in Public Bill will make it illegal to cause "intentional harassment, alarm or distress" to a person in public based on their sex. Those found guilty of violating the law face up to two years in prison.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I've been told that women wear those tight yoga pants with a short top for comfort, not to show off their ass. So don't look at them.
Look, don't stare. It's perfectly possible to enjoy the view without being a total creeper about it.
How can you tell somebody identifies as a man or a woman unless you catcall them and see how they respond? What if they're non-binary or two sex or asexual?
Soon it will be illegal to NOT catcall a trans woman because that's transphobic.
Go for it! 🙂
The corruption of Mathematics in Ontario, Canada.
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/22white-supremacy-how-woke-ideologues-corrupted-canadas-math-curriculum/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=homepage&utm_campaign=river&utm_content=featured-content-trending&utm_term=first
"Two plus two no longer equals four, according to members of the Ontario Mathematics Coordinators Association (OMCA), who consider the equation to be a white-supremacist dog whistle instead of a basic mathematical truth.
According to a webinar created by OMCA president Jason To, proponents of math’s political neutrality who use the phrasing “2 + 2 = 4” are engaged in an act of “Covert White Supremacy.”
In one tweet, Theijsmeijer pointed her followers to commentary by Laurie Rubel, an associate professor of mathematics education, explaining that proponents of “2 + 2 = 4” are grounded “in white, Western mathematics that marginalizes other possible values.”
Rubel argued that supporters of math’s political neutrality were oblivious to a deeper point: “It’s about truth: who holds the truth, who decides what is true, and how open we are as a society to multiple truths.” Although Rubel acknowledged the equation “literally” equals four, the statement is “used as a kind of basic truth & way to ridicule many critiques of mathematics as white and as western and as exclusionary.”
Rubel’s beliefs are becoming widespread among Ontario’s leading mathematics bodies, senior administrators, and a compliant academic establishment, according to several teachers whose accounts were substantiated by educational materials reviewed by National Review.
As math has become hyper-politicized, test scores have continued to plummet."
I can remember when we locked up the crazy people - - - - - - - - - - - -
Now we lock them up in universities and call them "Professor".
This acknowledgement of "other ways of thinking" will reverse that by making all answers true, thus guaranteeing full marks for everyone.
Skin color will dictate the truth in mathematics.
After reading the whole article, all I can say is "holy fuck, those people are psychotic". Also evil, because they're actively damaging the chances of any "disadvantaged" students to *escape* that position by understanding numbers and being able to use them to lift themselves. Which I do understand is their actual intent. Malevolent bastards.
"Which I do understand is their actual intent."
Exactly, because without the "oppressed" the progressives don't have anything to run on.
White supremacy so insidiously covert, they started using Arabic numerals in the 9th Century.
Just another spokesperson for Big To, toing the party line.
That's the funny part. We use an Arabic numeral system.
And it's not just symbolic either. Or, rather, it's integral to the historic adoption of mathematics as symbolic operations. That is, the representation of "4" as "2+2" may be a superficial trifle, but the representation of "1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1" as "10" and "10+1" as "11" is essentially non-Western and critical to higher and "lower" mathematics.
I say 2+2=20. Calculated in base 4, this is totally correct.
Indian, actually. Arab traders borrowed them from India, then the (mostly Greek) Byzantines borrowed them from the Arabs. Modern Arabic actual uses significantly different symbols. But, then or now, Indian, Arab and Greek mathematicians would all agree that 2+2=4. (Stipulating that you’re calculating in base 10.) Kinda blows the “white supremacy” silliness out of the water, since the Greeks were the only one of those groups that would count as even vaguely white. (Not that "whiteness" was even really a thing back then.)
The truth is what big brother says it is.
Say you have an alternate truth that the state disagrees with. Will the state accept it as true?
The definition of truth is being distorted based on the saying that everyone has their own truth which isn't really true. You do have your own set of experiences and situations but that is not truth although some people say they have their own truth. Now they are using a new definition of truth to lie.
2=2= anything other than four is a lie.
How many fingers do you see?
Orwell warned us.
Note on door:
“Could you keep the math lessons down! I’m trying to sleep!” –Your Neighbor in Room 102.
🙂
However, I don't think this is an attack on math. It's an attack on logic and perhaps western culture in general.
The Socratic method is now considered white supremacy interrogation.
This is what anti-free speech legislation creting a police state looks like.
"Those found guilty of violating the law face up to two years in prison."
And this one has some fairly serious teeth. Just leaves me wondering when we will reach to tipping point, where the sane people stop shrugging their shoulders and hunkering down.
GB, with things like it's no pointy knives or scissors laws and now this, is truly one big nursery school.
And then the government wonders why everyone is single, lonely, and not having the next generation of taxpayers.
If that law was in place a couple generations ago, many of the people who voted for it would have never been born.
The Protection from Sex-Based Harassment in Public Bill will make it illegal to cause "intentional harassment, alarm or distress" to a person in public based on their sex.
"She didn't whistle at me, guv'na. I want her locked up!"
what about the Brit chick cat-callers? fire up an Equal Rights Amendment!
A line from an old Elton John (Bernie Taupin) song comes to mind: "I don't whistle at you down the street. I would if I could, but I can't whistle you see."
Naw, I think the Brits are trying to catch up with US incarceration rates.
What if she requests to feel harassed, alarmed, or distressed on the basis of sex? Asking for... uh... a friend.
But a woman making an unwanted comment to a guy is apparently ok, based on the complete lack of reciprocity mentioned in the original link.
These people ruled a global empire for a couple of centuries, but now they're
liningqueuing up to get castrated.Wouldn't. Neither of them.
I’ve profited $17,000 in just four weeks by working from home comfortably part-time. I was devastated when I lost my previous business dec right away, but happily, I found this project, which has allowed me to get thousands of dollars from the comfort cfs06 of my home. Each person may definitely complete this simple task and earn extra money online by
visiting the next article———>>> http://Www.jobsrevenue.com