U.S. Trade Commission Admits Tariffs Raised Prices for American Consumers
American companies and consumers "bore nearly the full cost of these tariffs because import prices increased at the same rate as the tariffs."

Tariffs raise prices.
That's something that shouldn't count as news, but sadly qualifies these days.
Five years after then-President Donald Trump declared a trade war with China and slapped new tariffs on steel and aluminum, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has found that those tariffs jacked up prices and reduced the availability of tariffed goods. In a report released Wednesday, the commission reported that American companies and consumers "bore nearly the full cost of these tariffs because import prices increased at the same rate as the tariffs."
After investigating the consequences of both Trump's Section 232 tariffs (the supposed "national security" levies against steel and aluminum) and his Section 301 tariffs (imposed against a wide range of items imported from China), the ITC reported that in both cases, domestic price increases matched the cost of the tariffs almost exactly. "The USITC estimated that prices increased by about 1 percent for each 1 percent increase in the tariffs," the report states.
That's pretty much the economics textbook explanation for how tariffs work. They raise prices on imports to give an advantage to domestic products. But whatever small benefits might accrue to those domestic producers are overwhelmed by the costs.
The ITC report bears that out.
The steel tariffs, for example, caused imports into the U.S. to fall by 24 percent, according to the ITC's report. The reduction in supply caused prices for steel products to rise by 2.4 percent. In response, U.S. steelmakers churned out more steel, and by 2021 domestic steel production was $1.3 billion higher because of the tariffs, the ITC reports. Similarly, domestic aluminum production increased by $0.9 billion as a result of the tariffs.
That might seem to fit neatly into the narrative that Trump pitched: Tariffs would restrict imports and revitalize American manufacturing.
But it's not the whole story.
The higher prices created by the steel and aluminum tariffs forced those costs onto businesses that buy steel and aluminum. As a result, they cut production by 0.6 percent. Production by those downstream industries fell by $3.5 billion as a result of the tariffs, the ITC report concludes.
Trump used to talk about tariffs as if they would impose new transaction costs on businesses in China. President Joe Biden's top trade officials have made a version of the same argument, claiming that the tariffs can't be removed because it would somehow ease leverage against China.
But Americans pay the full cost of the tariffs, and the real dynamic has always been a domestic one. Tariffs grant small advantages to some domestic industries at the expense of downstream producers and consumers.
This isn't news either! But now that the federal government's own trade experts have come to the same conclusion as numerous academics, economists, and think tanks, maybe Biden will finally listen. We shouldn't need another five years of real-world evidence to confirm what everyone outside the White House already knows.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"Donald Trump declared a trade war... the consequences of both Trump's... That might seem to fit neatly into the narrative that Trump pitched... Trump used to talk..."
TRUMP!!!
"Biden will finally listen."
Oh, it's okay. Both sides, both sides...
I figured I would read the article to see how long before Boehm attacked Trump.
I didn’t hve to wait very long.
No shit. And the attacks are all on him, not policy. They didn’t mention a single policy by name. Just Trump. Trump, Trump, Trump. TDS truly is a mental disorder.
And it's all attacks by the author! They didn't even bother to quote another source. It's all straight from deranged Reason writers.
They really should change their name from Reason to RepublicanBashing.com.
Easily start receiving more than $600 every single day from home in your part time. i made $18781 from this job in my spare time afte my college. easy to do job and its regular income are awesome. no skills needed to do this job all you need to know is how to copy and paste stuff online. join this today by follow details on this page.
Here is I started.……………………>> http://Www.jobsrevenue.com
You would know, having been broken pretty badly by Trump.
Trump metaphorically grabbed Sarc, slammed him down face first on a table and plowed his ass without any lube. Now Sarc is doubly angry because Trump didn’t do that for real.
Poor Sarc, always a bridesmaid, never a bride.
So…. You’re paying attention. Any plans to double down on coming to kick my ass? Or are you going to officially slink away, because you realize how badly that would go for you?
I’ve been waiting for two months now for you to follow up on your threats.
The fact that Sarcasmic has to post that troll four or five times a day would give a thinking man pause, but not Sarcasmic.
He doesn't see the irony of having to head off bias complaints under almost every single article.
Alcoholism is a helluva thing.
Nah, Boehm starting discussing Trump in the third sentence. I was actually hoping for some background as to why the tariffs were applied in the first place, but alas, Boehm never mentioned it.
https://share.america.gov/trumps-china-tariffs-explained/
Under President Trump’s leadership, the United States is committed to rebalancing the U.S.-China trade relationship to achieve more fair and reciprocal trade. On March 22, President Trump directed his administration to take actions to address China’s forced technology transfers, discriminatory licensing restrictions, state-directed acquisition of U.S. sensitive technology, and hacking of U.S. commercial networks.
In response to China’s forced technology transfers, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) published for public comment a proposed list of Chinese goods imports that may be subject to an additional 25 percent tariff. The proposed list, which contains products that unfairly benefit from China’s industrial policies, is subject to a final determination after a public comment process. It has an estimated trade value of $50 billion.
"TRUMP!!!"
Since Trump was the one who championed the tariffs and hired "tariffs really work" Peter Navarro, who would you like to blame? Obama?
Now that the blindingly obvious conclusion that tariffs are a tax on consumers and raise prices has been conformed for the umpteenth time, can we all just agree that tariffs are a terrible idea?
Any attack on tariffs is an attack on Trump, and any attack on Trump is caused by TDS. Thus anyone critical of tariffs had Trump Derangement Syndrome.
You and Boehm do. I’m sure both of you furiously masturbate to his speeches.
Whiskey dick means Sarc's just going through the motions.
It is funny that the frenzied little retard obviously didn't read the article but is still trying to white knight for it anyway.
To be fair, after I read “ Five years after then-President Donald Trump declared a trade war with China….” I stopped reading. A sBoehm is as predictable as ever. And I haven’t swallowed any poison today.
"Since Trump was the one who championed the tariffs and hired “tariffs really work” Peter Navarro, who would you like to blame? Obama?"
How about the administration that's been in power for two and a half years, and quickly moved to reverse all Trump's policies except tarriffs, Shrike. In fact they doubled down on them across the board and created new ones.
How about those guys?
Eric just made the argument for tarrifs.
Im making over $13k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.last month her pay check was $12712 just working on the laptop for a few hours. This is what I do,
VISIT THIS WEBSITE HERE……………..>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
Eric Boehm raised the prices for consumers with his campaigning for Biden, but there are absolutely no benefits to even compete with the costs
Only "reluctantly" though.
An import tariff is ALWAYS paid in full by the person buying the imported goods. If the seller is ostensibly charged for it, they'll simply increase the price to cover it.
-jcr
Same with all taxes, fees, and regulatory costs.
Import Tax Cost money!!! OMG! Big news there./s
Now the *real* issue remains; should the governing body in charge of National Security be funded by Domestic Tax or International Trade Tax and at what level? Should all imports be FREE while Domestic runs 50%? Seems to me taxing imported trade would be the perfect fit for National security. You buy from foreign countries you pay the cost to ensure your trade security with foreign countries.
Now if you want to talk about bloated government spending; that’s entirely a different matter all together.
Exactly. The question isn’t whether tariffs are taxes, the question is whether tariffs are better or worse than other federal taxes. And the answer is crystal clear: every dollar that we raise via tariffs rather than via income tax/capital gains tax/corporate tax/borrowing, helps the US economy and Americans.
"Biden will finally listen”
*Pats Boehm on head, gives him a rubber ball to play with*
maybe Biden will finally listen
If he didn't listen or remember his oath of office to uphold the constitution you think a little thing like reports from think tanks will change his mind. Fuck that, he should be imprisoned for illegal taxation. All taxes must arise from the House of Representatives, not the presidents desk.
The entire democrat party should be removed from government after everything they’ve done over the last few years.
Anyone who voted for them should be sent to reeducation camps.
And who said that, Sarc? Removal from office is as simple as voting the bastards out and convincing others to vote the bastards out as well.
What happens when you can't convince them, and they keep voting for your political enemies? Doesn't that make them, the voters, your enemies as well? What can you do when your neighbors are your enemies? And what would you do if you achieved power?
The "you" was the euphemistic one, not you personally.
Look at Nardz and Sevo. That's the path their consciousness has taken.
Ideas!
Remember when Sarcasmic tried to ship Nardz and Sevo in an edgy little gay fanfic he posted here?
“sarcasmic 1 year ago
Flag Comment Mute User
I think him and Nardz are going to go on a shooting spree someday. I really do. Storm a Democrat convention with body armor and rifles. Actually no. That would require balls. They’ll probably do something more like the DC sniper. Hide in the trunk of a car when they’re not making sweet homosexual love.”
Ideas!
Or at least kindergarten.
Well if we could do that, I'd lump the Republicans in there for good measure as well. At least all the fucking assholes who voted for and signed the Cares Act into law.
Look at that. More unprincipled attacks on Trump. It's not as if libertarians support free trade and Trump didn't. Trump did. The problem is that libertarians don't understand free trade or tariffs. Free trade means fair trade. If other countries have tariffs then that's not fair, and trade can only be free if it's fair. Also tariffs are paid for by the country they are imposed upon, not consumers. Tariffs on China are tariffs on China, not Americans who buy Chinese goods. Stupid Reason and libertarians need to relearn economics.
Tariffs on China are tariffs on China,
You're an idiot. American buyers of Chinese products are the ones who pay the tariffs.
-jcr
Tell that to the Trumpanzies I'm mocking.
Yes, we recognize your unoriginal, hamfisted, and likely drunken attempts at hyperbole. They just aren’t any good.
And you still haven’t said when you’re coming to kick my ass. Are you now embarrassed and fearful? Because you absolutely won’t respond to me on this subject.
I wouldn’t blame you for cowering in fear.
Yes, and then that money goes into the budget.
So, the real question is: are tariffs better or worse than other federal taxes.
And the obvious answer is that tariffs are preferable to pretty much all other federal taxes. Tariffs are a tax on consumption. Almost all other federal taxes are taxes on productive domestic activities and therefore hurt the US.
How many times a day do you have to post this troll, Sarcasmic?
It's pretty much every article now, isn't it.
Does that maybe tell you something? Any lesson learned?
Is there anyone here who believes tariffs aren't a tax on consumers?
If so, what is your resoning?
Tariffs raise the price of foreign goods, which means people buy less of them. That costs foreigners money. Thus tariffs are a tax on foreign producers because it cuts into their revenue. Especially if China is involved, because it is known that the government runs all Chinese corporations. That makes tariffs a tax on the Chinese government!
*I wish I could say I’m not repeating defenses of Trump tariffs that were make right here in these comments by people who still post here, but that would be a lie.
Trump saw tariffs as a negotiating tool to gain trade concessions from bd actors, like China. Biden and his fellow travelers see tariffs as a permanent structural component of US trade policy.
This has been explained to you many times. But you’re a rageaholic, hyperbolic drunk (self admitted) who despises Trump. So meaningful discussion with you on this subject is a fruitless endeavor.
Same reason you would get from a Judge. It's irrelevant whether they are a tax or not. The plaintiff's burden is to show that the tariff's are not needed to establish fair trade, not that they are a tax on consumers.
Tariffs are a tax on consumers. And that's what makes them good, compared to, say, taxes on income, capital gains, or corporations.
The more government revenue we can shift away from taxes on productive activities towards taxes on consumption, the better for the country.
U.S. Trade Commission Admits Tariffs Raised Prices for American Consumers
PR, Guam, HI, and outlying territories subject to The Jones Act hardest hit.
Guam can’t take anymore goods shipped there. It will capsize the island for sure!
Im making over $13k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.last month her pay check was $12712 just working on the laptop for a few hours. This is what I do,
VISIT THIS WEBSITE HERE……………..>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
So the research shows that tariffs are paid for by the domestic consumer, not the country you’re imposing tariffs against (predictable and, indeed, predicted), but you’re not supposed to mention who was responsible for imposing tariffs in the first place.
Anyway, the idea that a trade deficit means that the US is being ripped off by the trade partner is in general bullshit, though IIRC Trump pretty much explicitly said that’s what it meant.
And see: https://www.cfr.org/blog/tariffs-and-trade-balance-how-trump-validated-his-critics
Of course, in the looking-glass world we inhabit, being in favour of generally free trade makes me a leftist.
In practice, a trade deficit between China and the US means that the US sends us low quality crap manufactured by slave labor, and we send them ownership shares in our industries and land, durable goods, and intellectual property.
That's not a ripoff, it is far, far worse.
Yeah, the supposition above assumes tariffs in the relative vacuum of an open market. If you impose a domestic gas tax to pay for clean energy and then tariff the unique components of the clean energy sole-sourced from countries subject to the tariff, you merely defeat your own clean energy initiatives. Obviously, the gas tax can just be raised to offset the effective tariffs on clean energy, but the gas tax is the underlying problem and the tariff inherently opposes that.
Which isn’t, by any means, saying tariffs are good. Just that the notion “tariffs = domestic tax” is, or can be, an oversimplification along the lines of “greenhouses are hot, therefor CO2 emissions will turn Earth into Venus”.
Which isn’t, by any means, saying tariffs are good. Just that the notion “tariffs = domestic tax” is, or can be, an oversimplification
Indeed, which s why I like real-world research, even if it merely supports a theoretical prediction.
Well, we have deficit that's more than a trillion dollars and consumers are going to pay for it somehow. Paying for it through tariffs on Chinese goods is one of the economically least harmful ways of paying for it.
Paying for it, like Biden is trying to, by increased inflation and increased income, corporate, and capital gains taxes, is the economically most harmful way.
Let's raise tariffs until the budget is balanced!
Let’s raise tariffs until the budget is balanced!
Do you understand anything about macroeconomics?
Yes, I do. I also understand international politics.
For both those reasons, I think higher tariffs on Chinese goods are an excellent idea. Unfortunately, we can’t raise them to the point where they would balance the budget. But tariffs combined with a national sales tax, and an abolition of all income taxes, capital gains taxes, and corporate taxes would be economically and politically good for the country.
You want to go on with destructive taxation of productive activities, trading with our enemies, and supporting slavery around the globe. Because that’s just who you are: evil and destructive.
Have you actually calculated what Chinese tariffs should be, to achieve your fiscal goals? Or what the national sales tax should be? What would be the inflationary or recessionary effects? How would it affect exporters? Are you concerned about sales taxes being regressive? etc etc.
You want to go on with destructive taxation of productive activities, trading with our enemies, and supporting slavery around the globe. Because that’s just who you are: evil and destructive.
Oh fuck off. I am not interested in excessive taxation whether of capital, income or expenditure, nor have I said anything that should let someone with more than half a brain think that. Have you stopped buying all Chinese goods and goods with Chinese components? I doubt it, which would make you a hypocrite.
Unfortunately, our trade with China isn't large enough to pay for the US budget via tariffs on Chinese goods. However, the ideal situtation would be if our budget were shrunk to the point that tariffs alone cover it, like it used to be.
Personal and non-personal consumption expenditures are a total of about $25 billion. The federal budget is about $3.8 billion. That would amount to a flat national sales tax of 15% all things being equal. Taking into account the effects of the tax on consumption, it might have to be closer to 20%. This is comparable to the Republican proposal, and it is comparable to European sales or VAT taxes (those, however, are paid in addition to a 40-50% income tax, which the US wouldn't need).
The effect would be deflationary and it would promote growth.
The tax would not be raised on exporters. It would be raised on importers, obviously.
No, I'm not concerned about that. But if you are, we could adopt a slightly higher flat rate and give people a rebate for the first few thousand dollars.
That's quite upsetting because it actually affects businesses, and it's already quite hard to keep your company going. Of course, it's not that hard to find sources like https://sourceforge.net/articles/why-your-business-needs-content-that-converts-and-how-to-build-a-winning-strategy/ to take your business to a new level and improve your workflow, but not all entrepreneurs use that, for some reason.