The Jones Act Is Driving Up Prices and Making Crises Worse
The legislation, which forbids shipping anything between American ports in ships that are not U.S. built and crewed, is just another a special deal that one industry has scammed out of Congress.

After a recent hurricane, Puerto Ricans desperately needed fuel.
Fortunately, an oil tanker was right offshore.
Unfortunately, the United States government forbade it to come ashore!
Why?
Because of a stupid law with a stupid name: The Jones Act.
The Jones Act forbids shipping anything between American ports in ships that are not U.S. built and crewed. This makes goods cost more (the average Hawaii family must pay $1,800 more a year) and sometimes, as happened in Puerto Rico, makes a crisis worse.
Yet America's shipping lobby claims this law is a good thing.
"The Jones Act ensures reliable, dedicated service," says American Maritime Partnership's Jennifer Carpenter in my new video. Her group lobbies for shipowners and labor unions.
"Your rules really hurt people!" I push back obnoxiously, flatly accusing her of sleazy manipulation. "You give money to politicians; they ban your competition."
She smiles and says, "The Jones Act is a time-tested American security law, so we are not at the mercy of foreign powers."
That's nonsense. The act has nothing to do with American security.
Foreign ships deliver goods to America from foreign powers all the time. That includes ships from China and Russia. Dozens of foreign vessels are in American harbors right now.
It's only within America that foreign shipping is banned. Only American ships and crews are allowed to move goods from Los Angeles to Hawaii, or from Miami to Puerto Rico.
The Jones Act is just another a special deal that one industry has scammed out of Congress.
Banning foreign ships didn't even do good things for America's shipbuilding industry. With competition outlawed, they got fat and lazy.
There were once more than 450 American shipyards. Now there are only 150. The number of American-crewed ships has dropped, too.
"Because of your monopoly," I say to Carpenter, "American shipyards keep closing. They don't have any competition, so they don't improve."
"Competition within our industry and with other modes of transportation is vigorous!" she replies. "It's dog eat dog."
"No, it's not!" I reply. "The best dogs are banned."
She pivots quickly. "The U.S government does not subsidize U.S. shipyards the way many of our strategic competitors and allies do."
That's true, and pathetic. Subsidies are destructive. It's good that America subsidizes less than other countries.
Anyway, Cato Institute trade policy specialist Scott Lincicome points out that American ships cost much more than the subsidy difference, "four to five times more to build than ships in Japan or Korea," mostly because of "decades of being protected from competition, simply not having to innovate."
Today no American shipyard builds even one ship that can carry natural gas. That's a big problem for New England if we have a cold winter. Eversource president Joseph Nolan worried there wouldn't be enough gas for the winter because he couldn't "get relief from the Jones Act." No wonder New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu calls the act an "antiquated 100-year-old union driven policy."
Carpenter lobbies against Jones Act waivers.
"You give politicians money not to grant waivers," I tell her.
"Hold up!" she exclaims. "Let's unpack this. Frankly, waivers should be safe, legal, and rare. What we too often see is somebody's trying to make a quick buck. There's no national defense need; there's no shortage of product. It's, 'Hey, I could save some money.'"
But saving money is good for consumers! It's good for everyone but America's shipping monopoly.
Of course, most industries don't want competition! American carmakers didn't want to compete with Honda and Toyota. But they got better because they had to compete.
"Just like foreign competition improved American automobiles," says Lincicome, "foreign competition would do the same for American-made ships."
We'd all be better off if America's shipping industry had to compete like every other business.
The Jones Act should die.
COPYRIGHT 2023 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Beetlejuice
Beetlejuice
Beetlejuice
Lightfoot bee gone.
I get paid more than $140 to $170 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $10k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site…
Here is I started.…………>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
The US is massively vulnerable because of our failure to maintain a merchant marine reserve. We no longer even pretend that it is possible for an enemy to forcibly shut down global shipping and trade. And yet that is precisely what potential enemies intend to do in the event of a real war. Attack subs are what they would use and here are the sub fleets by country: China – 78 Russia – 70 US – 68 North Korea – 35 South Korea – 22 Japan – 21 Iran – 19 India – 18 Turkey -12 Greece – 11 UK – 11
That ain’t the friendliest group of countries. And to the degree that it is, it indicates that the Asian shipping trade will disappear on Day 1 of any real conflict.
Whew. Thank God we don’t pre-position or stockpile any strategic materials. Or have any merchant ships in reserve (we had 2500 in 1950 and less than 100 today). And we depend entirely on Asian shipyards.
What could possibly go wrong?
The Jones Act is a sh*tty law because it wasn’t about national security or commie-market influence but apparently its entire basis is on market protectionism.
But I wouldn't forget about the threats of foreign trade as perfectly demonstrated below.
Q: How is the CCP censoring the media in the United States?
A: There are a lot of media companies internationally who would really like to invest in and be a part of the Chinese market. And in order to do that, they have to form some implicit agreement with the CCP that if certain information should be censored, they will comply.
https://reason.com/2023/02/26/hongkonger-anna-kwok-on-human-rights/
Not to mention all the people who "admire" China and the CCP.
Home earnings allow all people to paint on-line and acquire weekly bills to financial institutions. Earn over $500 each day and get payouts each week instantly to account for financial institutions. (bwj-03) My remaining month of earnings was $30,390 and all I do is paint for as much as four hours an afternoon on my computer. Easy paintings and constant earnings are exquisite with this job.
More information→→→→→ https://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
Good points those. I remember an article in a Seattle paper back about 1999 working out the effects of a sea-level fission explosion in that particular port. Prevailing winds tend to make that sort of thing non-local. Repealing the old law might make room for a better one taking modern weaponry--rather than Rum Row--into account.
Read TJJ2000's reply above.
https://libertarianinstitute.org/news/most-front-line-ukrainian-soldiers-killed-within-4-hours/
A retired American Marine fighting in Ukraine told ABC News the frontlines are a “meat grinder” where soldiers survive an average of “four hours.”
Troy Offenbecker is fighting alongside Ukrainian forces in the Donbas region. Moscow and Kiev have been battling around Bakhmut for several months as Russia’s forces have slowly made gains around the city.
In January, Germany estimated Kiev was losing a “three-digit number” of soldiers daily fighting for Bakhmut. At that time, the White House believed President Volodymyr Zelensky was committing too many lives and resources to defend the city.
Offenbecker’s commentary suggests that the situation may be getting worse for Ukrainian soldiers. “It’s been pretty bad on the ground. A lot of casualties.” He assessed, “the life expectancy is around four hours on the frontline.”
He said the Russian attack on the city is not letting up and had turned into a “meat grinder.” “[The artillery] is nonstop.” Offenbecker explained the Russian forces are fighting around the clock. “[The Russians] have maybe run into a shortage of shells lately, but the past couple of weeks, it’s been nonstop. All day and night,” he told ABC.
I don't believe this report any more than I believe the report that each ukranian soldier dead is taking ten Russians with him.
Ukraine is losing, but numbers like that would not have been sustained as long as they have without losing the city. They would literally just not be able to ship in his fast enough to replace the losses.
The Babushka doll hasn't sung yet. Now go eat your Twitter feed!
""Hold up!" she exclaims. "Let's unpack this. Frankly, waivers should be safe, legal, and rare."
Not sure if quoting Bill Clinton about abortion is a good move.
Today no American shipyard builds even one ship that can carry natural gas. That's a big problem for New England if we have a cold winter. Eversource president Joseph Nolan worried there wouldn't be enough gas for the winter because he couldn't "get relief from the Jones Act."
I didn't think I'd say this about a Stossel post, but he's finally wandered into what is probably Reason's favorite nexus of retardation after S230: What. The. Everloving. Fuck?
So, if NH needs gas this winter, Russia should just keep a full tanker floating off the coast of Massachusetts and *specifically* not unload it in MA, who can then pipe it to NH or burn it in MA and push it down the electrical lines to NH, but keep it there in case MA, NH, or both or other need NG?
This retardation makes it seem like Reason would advocate in favor of TX oil producers paying Chinese shippers to move NG to NH. WTF is wrong with you people that these issues keep making you so retarded?
No, people in NH and the rest of New England who need more natural gas should (1) stop electing green progressives and then (2) change the laws and policies that inhibit or prohibit pipeline construction. If not, fuck 'em.
Ackshuyally, it's both of those and repeal The Jones Act. That way, you get floor polish, dessert topping, and edible Astroglide substitute.
🙂
What is this babbling about Massachusetts and New Hampshire? Are you aware that both of these states are in New England? Did you even read the article?
As for Russian tankers, wouldn't it be simpler to load up a ship with natural gas at an American port and deliver it to New England. But since there are no American-built natural gas carriers, the Jones Act bans doing this. Only natural gas from outside America can be delivered to an American port!
As for the alleged purpose of the Jones Act, encouraging American ship-building and merchant marine, it's clearly failed.
“Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt.”
As for Russian tankers, wouldn’t it be simpler to load up a ship with natural gas at an American port and deliver it to New England.
You mean it’s so simple and profitable to move NG from one American port to the other by boat that not one American business does it despite The Jones Act doing nothing to prevent it? I mean, there are shipyards all over New England, if it’s so profitable and critically important that NG be shipped between two American ports, why aren’t they building any ships?
“This retardation makes it seem like Reason would advocate in favor of TX oil producers paying Chinese shippers to move NG to NH.” – markm23
You beat Reason to the punch. Dumbfuck.
How could any of that happen without government direction and funding?
Again, backwards/funny thing: the government does thumb the scales there as well, but Reason gives zero shits because it doesn't make them look like white saviors of poor brown people who totally aren't racist because they've got Chinese friends.
The fact that it's easier and cheaper to move NG via pipeline rather than ship is a reason repeal the Jone Act, not continuing to prop up uncompetitive American shipbuilding.
Also, nothing in the Jones Act would prevent a Russian tanker loaded with Russian NG from docking and unloading in any US port.
Puerto Rico and Hawaii are pretty much the only places affected by the Jones Act and both are affected negatively.
The fact that it’s easier and cheaper to move NG via pipeline rather than ship is a reason repeal the Jone Act, not continuing to prop up uncompetitive American shipbuilding.
You mean the uncompetitive domestic shipbuilding that's not happening?
Again, I'm not in favor of keeping The Jones Act around forever, unchanged, but the arguments Reason (and others) consistently makes are consistently between backwards, anti-informative, self-contradictory, anti-market/market-oblivious, and just plain retarded.
Even by their own retarded precepts, if the US were supposed to start building NG tankers like Russia does to ship between our ports that would make the market Russian port*s* and Russia would need to relax *their* cabotage laws. But, again, Reason doesn't give a shit about actual economics or reciprocity of rights across borders, they care about looking noble for the poors (who kinda don't even like us).
Also, nothing in the Jones Act would prevent a Russian tanker loaded with Russian NG from docking and unloading in any US port.
Right. As I indicated, the tanker would dock at (e.g.) Boston and the NG would get piped to NH. For the tanker to dock at Boston *and* Portsmouth is like having an 18-wheeler deliver the daily mail. Again, this doesn't support the Jones Act but the notion that the Jones Act is the source of this particular problem is at best, naively wrong. At worst, a deliberate distraction from the fact that various legislators in New England are cancelling and shutting down domestic pipelines in favor of buying Russian oil (while simultaneously advocating war against Russia).
Puerto Rico and Hawaii are pretty much the only places affected by the Jones Act and both are affected negatively.
Sure. What, $0.0005 on the $1? Again, if it were such a massive negative impact then, again by your/Reason's own arguments and precepts, why isn't there a massive shipbuilding industry cashing in on the protection? Hawaiians charge themselves $0.16/gal. for fuel, why the fuck is a fraction of a penny cost decrease for only 1.4M people (assuming they all care or want it) when SS and SNAP costs far more than The Jones Act costs anyone to virtually all Americans. What makes The Jones Act disproportionately more important to libertarians other than projecting as white knights for brown people in distress (and furthering globalism/Chinese market domination)?
This is the same sort of senseless, anti-market reasoning that's used to bring broadband to rural America and spend more money fighting the opioid epidemic in rural America. We dump all kinds of aid on PR. If the people of PR wanted to live like New Yorkers do, they'd make PR look like NYC. They don't do that because they don't want PR to be NYC. The Jones Act is beyond insignificant both in regard to culture, because culture, in regard to aid.
There's no shipbuilding industry cashing in because the markets of Alaska, Hawaii Puerto Rico, and both Coasts are all captive of U.S. shipping companies if they want freight between U.S. ports...all because of the Jones Act.
And the cost to these regions is far more than a fraction of a penny. 33 years ago. A Big Mac in Alaska cost $11, precisely because everything has to be shipped or trucked in and The Jones Act increases the shipping costs, as well as gives leeway for higher prices on trucking.
And the people of Alaska, Hawaii, and the Coasts aren't all "poor brown people" in need of "a White Savior.". This affects everybody!
Congratulations! You win The Sanford Dummy Reel of the Day!
Sanford Dummy Reel
https://youtu.be/moYdbNXBwvk
It's not profitable, precisely because of the Jones Act. How hard is that to understand?
Forget it, markm23, he's rolling. His specialty is yammering so much to say so little, and this time, I think all coherence is gone.
Reeeeeeeeeeee-eeeeeee-eeeason and... Mrs. Jooooooones Mrs. Jooooo-ooooooo-oooones...
They got a thiiiiiiiiiiiingggg goooin' ooooooo-oooooonnn!
Mr. Jones and me tell each other fairy tales
And we stare at the beautiful women
"She's looking at you. Ah, no, no, she's looking at me."
Smiling in the bright lights, coming through in stereo
When everybody loves you, you can never be lonely
...
Mr. Jones and me look into the future
Yeah, we stare at the beautiful women
"She's looking at you. I don't think so. She's looking at me."
Standing in the spotlight, I bought myself a gray guitar
When everybody loves me, I will never be lonely
'"The Jones Act ensures reliable, dedicated service," says American Maritime Partnership's Jennifer Carpenter in my new video. Her group lobbies for shipowners and labor unions.'
Somebody sold their soul and their cunt.
“Hold up!” she exclaims. “Let’s unpack this. Frankly, waivers should be safe, legal, and rare...
Judging from the boilerplate speech, I think she moonlights for the National Organization for Women too.
😉
She needs to buy plastic surgery for horsey face.
🙂
Look, the purpose of government is to fuck with people. We can argue about who does the fucking and who gets fucked, but only some fringe types question the need to fuck.
The funny thing is, it sounds like Reason has got this completely backwards a couple of layers over.
It feels a lot like Michelle Obama and “food deserts”. Just because you don’t see your favorite grocery chain in some area doesn’t mean the people in that area are starving, especially if they’re more obese than ever. Acting like we should repeal The Jones Act so that trans-atlantic NG tankers can dock in more US ports at a time is like suggesting that food deserts should have more Sam’s Clubs and Costcos per block.
US ship makers, in 2023, don’t build ships because they can’t compete with air, ground, rail, pipe, and wire on a fair playing field. This is a fact because The Jones Act doesn’t prevent them from competing. But that’s not all! That’s not the only part of the “cabotage market”. They *could* build ships to cabotage between parts of the EU or Russia or Africa or the S. Pacific or S. America or wherever ports, but it’s not possible because those countries or economic zones have their own cabotage laws preventing it.
Additionally, Puerto Rico will never be as affluent and well off as the US in general the way rural parts of Idaho will never be as affluent as Central Park and the S. Chicago or L.A. will never be as affluent as The North Shore or Hollywood. The Jones Act has about as much to do with it as it does with Idaho or S. Chicago. As above, there’s a case to be made the opposite way: a shipyard in PR would be American-flagged ships and would, apparently, be *the* single business performing in the market space, if such a space as Reason pretends to exist, actually did.
No, Reason focuses on this law the same way it focuses on immigration. It’s not about cutting government expenditures or making old unintelligent laws more intelligent (The Jones Act is far less intrusive than its predecessor, simply repealing it doesn’t ensure the trade Reason wants can legally take place, and would actually makes the FedGov intervention into domestic shipping more intrusive). It’s about trashing old-white guys so that we can set fire to more money to keep brown and yellow people warm.
Obesity is more about carbs/insulin than about calories. Not all calories cost the same. Nor are they all available in convenience stores and gas stations.
Obesity is more about carbs/insulin than about calories.
^Tell me you're an out-of-touch first world idiot without saying "I'm an out-of-touch first world idiot."
You don't get an overabundance of carbs, insulin spikes, and obesity from a lack of food, dumbass. If your bodega, convenience store, or gas station is non-insulin-spiking food free, it's because they choose to be that way. In which case, I agree with them that it's there business and fuck you if you want to change it.
Lack of calories isn't even Ethiopia in most years. You are beyond clueless since you really do seem to believe malnutrition=starvation
Lack of calories isn’t even Ethiopia in most years.
Wow, uh, discounting, by your own statements, years of actual starvation to refute fundamental physics and biology on the internet in defense of something Michelle Obama didn't say against something she did say... I freely admit to being clueless as to the unending piles of bullshit that exist nowhere else besides in your head.
For most people here, anyway, that be us.
🙂
Would be ironic if this ends up leading to increased support for PR independence.
I get paid more than $140 to $170 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $10k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site…
Here is I started.…………>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
William Graham Sumner wrote some worthwhile things about free trade in the real world. Wesley Livesey Jones wrote the Jones Five and Ten Law which as of 02MAR1929 effectively made light beer and watery wine on up into felonies even as the League of Nations Opium Advisory poobahs in Geneva were working out plans for a planned economy in drug cartels so that other kind of prohibition could spread its tentacles. Funny how nearly the entire planet went into Crashes and Depressions that same year, isn't it?
Soooo...Mairzy Doats and Dozy Doats and Wesley Livesy Jones-y?
Interesting legislative history there...once I made it through the haze.
Again,
Trump ~2016: Repeal the Clean Air Act, it’s a burdensome regulation that costs everyone and is causing Appalachian coal miners to lose their jobs.
Reason: The Act is burdensome and should be repealed, but Trump is stupid if he thinks repealing it will do anything more for the coal miners than it would do for buggy-whip manufacturers. If they really want to turn Appalachia around, they should learn to code.
Reason, any other time: OMG! People are freezing from harsh winters in NH this year and have to buy fuel from Russia because of The Jones Act! Diesel fuel is expensive in a country (or state or territory) wholly reliant on other countries to ship diesel to them, with or without The Jones Act, because of The Jones Act! Save PR! Repeal The Jones Act.
Also again, worth noting that repealing the Clean Air Act takes us back to a less burdensome air quality regulation standard (if not also more polluting, but still, less government) whereas repealing The Jones Act means the ships can be built in more different places, but still have to be regulated, and the crew can be more diverse, but still have to be regulated, however, bonus regulation! the corporate ownership down to the shareholders must be more regulated as well.
At least Reason’s open border argument is legitimately feeding foreigners into a giant machine that needs to consume them to keep moving forward. Their ‘Repeal The Jones Act’ idiocy is like saying we need more immigrants to revive the coal industry. It’s, at best, arcane and useless and should be repealed. The arguments about winters in NH are like asserting we should bring immigrants in to mine more coal, not making a valid argument, just demonstrating that you generally don’t have the least fucking clue what’s going on or why you're saying what you're saying.
Whoever said you can't repeal The Clean Air Act and teach Appalachians how to code and repeal The Jones Act?...Dummy!
I support subsidizing the woodchipper industry.