Republicans Want More Control Over America's Oil Reserve. They Should Scrap It Instead.
The Strategic Petroleum Reserve is supposed to insulate the U.S. from oil embargoes and foreign wars. More often, it has been used like an insurance policy for private companies.

In March 2022, as crude oil prices spiked amid Russia's war in Ukraine, President Joe Biden announced that he would be tapping into the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) to help mitigate rising gas prices. In what he called a "wartime bridge," Biden authorized the release of up to 180 million barrels over six months.
This week, the Biden administration is clashing with House Republicans over a bill that would limit its control over future SPR releases. A better idea would be to simply scrap the reserve altogether.
In 1975, after an oil embargo against the United States by Arab nations, Congress established the SPR, with an emergency supply of up to 1 billion barrels. To mitigate the effects of future embargoes or foreign wars, the Department of Energy (DOE) would sell oil to oil companies experiencing shortages or disruptions.
This month, Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R–Wash.), who now heads the House Energy and Commerce Committee, introduced H.R. 21, the Strategic Production Response Act. The bill would limit the government's ability to release reserve oil until the DOE opens up more federal land for production of oil and gas. In a letter seen by Reuters, DOE Secretary Jennifer Granholm cautioned Republicans against the bill, arguing that it would "significantly weaken this critical energy security tool, resulting in more oil supply shortages in times of crisis and higher gasoline prices for Americans."
But despite numerous disbursements over the years, Biden's announcement marked only the second time the reserve had been used for its intended purpose, to address "a severe energy supply interruption" causing "a severe increase in the price of petroleum products" that is "likely to cause a major adverse impact on the national economy." More frequently, SPR oil is sold to oil companies experiencing disruptions due to natural disasters or equipment malfunctions.
In response to Granholm's letter, Rodgers told Reuters that the DOE had depleted much of the SPR's reserve "with no real plan to refill it." Indeed, the SPR achieved its peak volume of 727 million barrels in December 2009, and for much of its history, it contained 450 million barrels or more. But currently, the reserve amount sits at around 370 million barrels, its lowest level in nearly four decades. That may sound like a dire situation, but at the same time, commercial oil producers hold 448 million gallons of crude oil in inventory.*
And like any government program, the SPR is also a bad deal for taxpayers. In December, the DOE announced that it would begin repurchasing oil to replenish the reserve, bragging that the price per barrel was now lower than when it sold. But as Alan Reynolds, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, noted in 2022, the SPR historically tends to buy oil when prices are high and sell when prices are low. For example, the DOE continued acquiring oil for the SPR even as the price of crude more than doubled between 2007 and 2008.
Clearly, the government has no business managing purchases and sales. Not to mention, it holds less in oil reserves than the amount held by private companies, who are sitting on millions of gallons. House Republicans should go one step further and get rid of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve altogether.
CORRECTION: Commercial oil producers collectively hold 448 million gallons in inventory, while the SPR contains 370 million gallons. As pertains specifically to the petroleum industry, "reserves" refer to the amount of oil that remains underground.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Lancaster, you miss the point totally. The goal here isn't regarding the SPR, it's regarding the Biden Administration's total reluctance to open up any areas on federal lands for oil and gas exploration and drilling. The House Republicans are trying (rightly) to force Biden to open them back up and lease the lands.
I'd like to believe the Republicans are that high-minded, but they are politicians after all. Got any links to a better description of this kerfuffle than this lightweight article?
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/21/text
Strategic Production Response Act
This bill limits the drawdown of petroleum in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve until the Department of Energy develops a plan to increase the percentage of federal lands leased for oil and gas production.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/21/cosponsors
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,300 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link——————————->>> http://Www.SmartJob1.Com
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.NETPAYFAST.COM
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/exclusive-us-energy-head-warns-republicans-oil-bill-would-lift-pump-prices/ar-AA16vAOG
A bill called the Strategic Production Response Act, introduced earlier this month by Republican Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers, would limit presidential authority in releasing oil from the strategic reserve, except in the case of a severe energy supply interruption.
Makes sense. Since Biden spent 2022 squandering the reserve to benefit democrats in the midterms.
I earned $50000 last month by the use of operating on-line most effective for five to eight hours on my pc and this was so that i in my opinion could not accept as authentic with earlier than running in this website. if you too want toclean earn this type of huge coins then come and be a part of us. do this internet-website on line .
More information→→→→→ https://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
Thanks!
Confused by the new section 2:
I probably ought to look at paragraph (1).
I am making $92 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $16,000 a month by working on a laptop, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website. http://Www.workstar24.com
Controlled dissent understands the situation.
"Lancaster, you miss the point totally."
Oh, Lancaster definitely hasn't missed the point. That's why he's busy manufacturing a different one here.
Do you even 'Reasonista', ITL?
Heh, true. It's Lancaster's MO to defend a Dem and throw mud on the GOP when possible.
I've made 64,000 Dollars so far this year working online and I'm a full time student. Im using an online business opportunity I heard about and I've made such great money. It's really user friendly and I'm just so happy that I found out about it. Heres what I do. 🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
More information→→→→→ https://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
At this point it’s probably easier to point out the Reason writers who don’t do that.
So ……. just Stossel?
Anything to make us more dependent on foreign oil.
Yeah, because that's never had any downsides in living memory...
The SPR is run just like every other part of fed.gov: moronically and terribly.
An SPR based on an arbitrage model would be useful. Buy when prices fall below a certain point and sell into high prices. A neutral manager could administer it with a 20 person staff. Done right it would return money back to the Treasury.
Which sort of proves the point that it would be better to have no SPR at all. Leave it to markets.
The idea of a strategic reserve made sense in the past when out ability to produce oil was falling year by year. Now it is debatable.
I still see as useful in the event of a massive natural disaster or terrorist attack where supply lines are disrupted. That should be what its used for, an emergency.
I didn't see an explanation of this in the article. Is there a second page I am missing?
This.
The current administration gave away the cheap oil we had, and now can’t afford to refill the reserve that we should have in case of emergency , so we should just scrap it,, because reasons
But the ccp company that hunter had stock in needed 5 mil barrels of oil! You act like you don't even care about bidens wallet
I believe this is in reference to that...
More frequently, SPR oil is sold to oil companies experiencing disruptions due to natural disasters or equipment malfunctions.
I would not argue that the SPR has not been misused. A LOT of things are misused. Shall we seek to disband, destroy, or ban all objects of misuse due to human stupidity, or greed?
The bottom line is the SPR is supposed to be there to allow us to fight a war of survival against encroachers or invaders if/when our domestic production facilities have been destroyed and our import capabilities have been reduced or eliminated.
However, the way we are running the country now suggests that the next move will be to empty the SPR and distribute its contents among various other countries whose “huddled poor are yearning to sniff a little crude oil.”
I've seen examples of shallow thinking expressed before, but never a better example than this article.
BIDEN "used" it "like an insurance policy for private companies"...
FTFY...
An Insurance Policy for his own 'Kill the Oil Industry' initiatives.
Republicans are right; The SPR equivocates as National Security measure. A National Security measure Biden just SOLD-OFF to cover up his failing Commie-Agenda's... (i.e. What good are fighter jets going to be without any fuel?)
To cover up Biden's failing "commie" agenda?
How about to add supply to the market to bring down the prices after Trump's gift to the oil companies of removing supply?
In an April 2 phone call, Trump told Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman that unless the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) started cutting oil production, he would be powerless to stop lawmakers from passing legislation to withdraw U.S. troops from the kingdom, four sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-oil-trump-saudi-specialreport-idUKKBN22C1V4
“Just spoke to my friend MBS (Crown Prince) of Saudi Arabia, who spoke with President Putin of Russia, & I expect & hope that they will be cutting back approximately 10 Million Barrels, and maybe substantially more which, if it happens, will be GREAT for the oil & gas industry!“
LOL... As-if a momentary production limit request from 3-years ago has so much importance on today's market in contrast to shutting down entire pipelines and pushing to end the oil industry all together.
It is interesting to learn that FDR brokered the deal that made this Gov-Control of international oil so easily dictated though.
First, Biden first dipped into the SPR in March 2022, so 2 years after Trump's deal.
Second, the deal Trump made to help the oil companies and screw over the everyday Joe was not just a one time shot...
The deal reached by the so-called OPEC+ group, which ends the price war between Saudi Arabia and Russia, reduces global output by 9.7 million barrels per day in May and June, helping to ease a global gut exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Production will also be reduced by 8 million bpd from July through December and 6 million bpd from January 2021 through April 2022.
And Biden decided to sell-off the SPR instead of to renegotiate because??????
Anyone not entirely playing partisan games knows the answer to that... One of Left-Nazi's major agenda's is to kill off/monopolize all energy except unicorn farts.
Keep spinning.
You are claiming he did not try to renegotiate? Why are you spinning Trump's gift to the oil companies at the detriment to the consumer at the gas pumps?
OT: “More documents marked as classified found at Biden's home,White House says”
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-documents-more-found-wilmington-delaware-home/
FTA:
“Lawyers for President Biden found more documents marked as classified at his home in Wilmington, Delaware, than previously known, the White House acknowledged in a statement Saturday. White House lawyer Richard Sauber said in a statement that a total of six pages of documents marked as classified were found during a search of Mr. Biden's private library.
The White House had said previously that only a single page was found there.”
Oopsie poo!
But despite numerous disbursements over the years, Biden's announcement marked only the second time the reserve had been used for its intended purpose, to address "a severe energy supply interruption" causing "a severe increase in the price of petroleum products" that is "likely to cause a major adverse impact on the national economy."
I read that to mean the purpose is to prevent price fluctuations. Or to put it another way, to prevent markets from sending information.
"the reserve amount sits at around 370 million barrels, its lowest level in nearly four decades. That may sound like a dire situation, but at the same time, commercial oil producers hold 448 million gallons of crude oil in inventory.*"
Both of these numbers are barrels.
"CORRECTION: Commercial oil producers collectively hold 448 million gallons in inventory, while the SPR contains 370 million gallons. " BARRELS. There are 42 gallons in a barrel. The oil price is $81 per barrel.
Having a "strategic oil reserve" in case of war makes sense.
What doesn't make sense is for politicians to use it to manipulate market prices.
That’s called corruption, and squandering.
And maybe some ‘light treason’.
"Biden's announcement marked only the second time the reserve had been used for its intended purpose,"
The level of willful gullibility the above represents is breathtaking.
He pursued policies intended to deliberately reduce the supply of oil in America, and drive up prices. The administration was explicit about having this as a goal!
Then they dumped about a third of the SPR temporarily lowering the price just before the midterm elections, so that they wouldn't pay a political prices for their policy.
This is about as categorically opposite to the SPR's purpose as it would be possible to achieve, short of pumping the oil out and immediately setting it on fire to prevent it from being used.
"like any government program, the SPR is also a bad deal" -- you're the definition of stopped clock. Why don't you move to Somalia? Very little government there.
Many gov't programs may be unnecessary, but a safeguard against oil embergoes? Really?
Unless I'm reading this very wrong, you're saying that between the SPR and the oil companies we have about 20 million barrels in reserve. 9 million of that in the SPR which is supposed to have according to the site 713 million.
Or are you mixing 'gallons' and 'barrels' at whim?
On the verge of a potential WWIII it makes no sense to disband the SPR...
It does if you're on the take from a strategic foe.
Good point!
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.SALARYBEZ.COM