New House Foreign Affairs Chair Michael McCaul Is a Standard Old-School Interventionist
Kevin McCarthy's pick to lead the House Foreign Affairs Committee evades any post-Trump humbleness in foreign policy.

For those who hoped the new Republican-led and Trump-approved House of Representatives under Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R–Calif.) might promote some of the better aspects of MAGA-ism, such as a foreign policy that recognized the mistakes of the past three decades, and charter a less bellicose and controlling path for the U.S. abroad, the ascension of Rep. Michael McCaul (R–Texas) to chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee should be unpleasant cold water.
While the Trumpian strain in the GOP is supposed to favor a radical rethink of the U.S. mission to find and combat foreign adversaries with every sort of intervention, involvement, and pressure even if short of direct troop deployment, McCaul retains an older sense of an abiding American mission to shape the world to our desires and "interests."
McCaul:
• is an enthusiastic supporter of U.S. military aid to Ukraine and helping ensure Russian President Vladimir Putin and Russian leaders face war crimes tribunals;
• is fighting to raise the political costs of ending foreign interventions by an attack investigation on President Joe Biden's Afghanistan withdrawal (which was following through on Trump's intentions) and insists the U.S. must even now "hold the Taliban accountable for their appalling actions";
• wants to make sure the U.S. is optimally aggressive in supporting Taiwan against China, including "strategic, long-term security assistance well in advance of conflict in order to effectively deter, and, when necessary, to respond to, acts of aggression";
• wants more U.S. pressure on Nicaragua;
• is angry that Biden "has backed away from the goal of North Korea's complete denuclearization [and] failed to make the security commitments to the Indo-Pacific that its own National Defense Strategy demands";
• demands "immediate action to combat and deter the proliferation of Iran's conventional and non-conventional weapons, including through the use of sanctions and enforcement of U.S. export controls";
• legislates to ensure the U.S. keeps an eye on foreign lands' "freedom of expression…with respect to electronic information";
• and had been a loud voice in opposition to former President Donald Trump's plans to lessen U.S. presence in Syria.
While McCaul thankfully isn't making open calls to immediately send in the troops to solve all the world's problems, he is a largely pre-Trump Republican when it comes to foreign policy, eagerly demanding to keep U.S. money, arms, and pressure at play in as many foreign fields as he can survey.
In general, as per his tweet below, a House in which McCaul's running the Foreign Affairs Committee seems one dedicated to going back to the old GOP playback of griping the Democrats are insufficiently tough in managing the world, a bad mindset from which to run opposition-to-the-executive foreign policy in the House of Representatives:
From the collapse of Afghanistan to Putin's invasion of Ukraine and rising threats from China, the Biden administration has projected weakness and left our nation vulnerable.
These global threats and the administration's open border policies make a dangerous combination. pic.twitter.com/fWYIzvOSrS
— Michael McCaul (@RepMcCaul) November 15, 2022
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The swamp is adequately hydrated.
Making every month extra dollars by doing an easy job Online. Last month i have earned and received $18539 from this home based job just by giving this only mine 2 hrs a day. Easy to do work even a child can get this and start making money Online. Get this today by.
follow instructions on this website… http://www.smartcash1.com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://WWW.PAYNET2.COM
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://WWW.SALARYBEZ.COM
OK, this time I got to read eight words in an article supposedly about McCaul before I hit "Trump".
You should have kept reading. It gives praise to Trumpian non-interventionist foreign policy. Something libertarians have consistently given him credit for.
Look who has turned into a Trump cultist.
Funny, I seem to recall the writers of Reason giving him nothing but shit for it. Remember how pulling out of Syria and reducing forces in Iraq were treated?
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
https://WWW.APPRICHS.com
"might promote some of the better aspects of MAGA-ism"
wonder how many times this will appear over the coming months, years, decades. Maybe this is the start of a cure for TDS.
I don't recall this sort of scrutiny for the BLM/Muslim Brotherhood approved Pelosi picks.
You hated Trump and everything about him so the fact this foreign policy direction is far from Trump's should have you giddy. Or do you not have a point beyond "Democrats acceptable, Republicans must be bashed".
You do realize that this article is bemoaning Republicans for doing a u-turn on Trump's foreign policy, right?
Like maybe they judge the policy by its merits, not the source.
No it isn't. The praise for Trump is faint and unnecessary for the story. It is clickbait or TDS.
Google pays an hourly wage of $100. My most recent online earnings for a 40-hour work week were $3500. According to my younger brother’s acquaintance, he works cs-02 roughly 30 hours each week and earns an average of $12,265. I’m in awe of how simple things once were.
.
.
More information→→→→→ https://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
lol
If it’s critical of Republicans, then it’s praise for Democrats. If it’s critical of Republicans and Democrats, then it’s praise for Democrats. If it’s critical of Democrats but does not contain praise for Republicans, then it’s praise for Democrats. If it’s praise for Republicans without sufficient criticism for Democrats, then it’s praise for Democrats.
This being the last one.
Edit: Except no. It's criticism of Republicans for not being more like Trump.
OK, smarty, what was the main point of this story? What was it reporting?
It was reporting a chicken hawk leading the committee.
What did Trump have to do with that? The faint praise was a backhand compliment. It contributed nothing to the main point.
It was TDS.
Or alternatively it’s a story of the Republican Party abandoning the positives of the Trump years (he killed fewer people than any president in my lifetime) and returning to being dicks regarding foreign policy.
Edit: Wait a minute. How many wars did Carter start? That claim in parentheses might be wrong. Though I'd like it to be true.
You mean the policy they relentlessly attacked him for? Yes dipshit, I get that but that just points out the editorial view that regardless of the policy Reason must attack Republicans even if they're doing what Libertarians should want them to do. On the other side there is zero pushback or denunciation of the Democrats even as they impose the most financially retarded, authoritarian and warmongering rules and policy imaginable.
But please defend team Reason and their defense of the left.
I missed the part where libertarians were being critical of Trump for not killing people.
Apparently I must be wrong. Please enlighten me.
Ah, you were mistaking Reasonoids for libertarians.
What color is the sky on your planet? You're clearly not reading the same Reason that I am.
It is quite bad that we have an interventionist as the head of that committee. This is just a very bad thing.
That's quite the Doctor Strangelove look he's got going on.
This x 1000
He’s learned to stop worrying and love the bomb.
Edit: on second thought, he probably always loved the bomb.
We have to protect our precious bodily fluids somehow.
is fighting to raise the political costs of ending foreign interventions by an attack investigation on President Joe Biden's Afghanistan withdrawal
He's not the only one. The withdrawal was a disaster and needs to be investigated.
I understand the premise behind letting third world dictators flee to exile with half the country's treasury in Switzerland; it avoids more deaths and civil war.
This is not such a case. The man responsible is still in office and needs to be held accountable, and everyone who might be in charge in the future needs to be deterred.
Complaining about holding a politician accountable is flat out wrong.
No investigation necessary.
Trump had devised a safe(r) and workable plan based on military and political realities. Therefore Biden had to do the opposite, regardless of the cost or impact.
Not everything that turns out contrary to expectations needs to be "investigated", especially when the hands of those doing the "investigations" aren't clean either.
A missed field goal doesn't need to be investigated. Pulling the military out before civilians, not anticipating the Taliban's moves, 13 dead soldiers, a drone strike on aid workers, and blindsiding our allies needs to be investigated.
the guy who took the video of the taxiing plane w/people hanging off should be shot at the very least
And how do you know the investigation will be worthless before conducting it?
Even I do a little introspection when a stew turns out less than stellar.
You forgot to add the bay leaf, didn't you?
She knows because she knows who the target is so St. Pedo Pete cannot have done wrong. Funny how she had no issue with Nancy Pelosi running the J6 committee but suddenly "unclean hands" are super important to this twat.
And how do you know the investigation will be worthless before conducting it?
Everyone, even you, has limited resources. Your argument is over priorities.
Oh fuck off you leftist shill. If Congress had the free time for their Stalinist show trial over J6 or impeachment over a President exercising his powers then they have ample time to investigate the botched withdrawl that abandoned American civilians to the Taliban.
Are you pretending to be a retard or are you a retard in real life?
Are you incapable of answering questions?
Never mind, it is rhetorical.
What questions? I was just responding to a retardedly retarded retort.
The only retards here are you and Anastasia. I get you cannot make a coherent statement on what you find wrong, the alcoholism will do that, but please educate me on which part was wrong.
Did you find the J6 trial to be a model of fairness, with all possible defense precluded beforehand? Or maybe you think lower level functionaries have final say over foreign policy and how dare the President disagree.
You are truly sad and pathetic.
Good reminder that while the GOP is slightly less statist than the Left, it ain't much. They both love them some Big Government.
The left wants to manage everyone with the administrative state, and the right wants to wave its dick around to prove it has moral superiority.
>>better aspects of MAGA-ism
well at least the warmongers are still all (D) oh wait
Russia and China have no trouble with interventionist foreign policies. If we, as a democratic and capitalist society don't try to keep Russia and China in check, who will?
We saw what happened, when Neville Chamberlain tried to run a non-interventionist foreign policy.
For anyone with a U.S. passport, find the page with the quote from JFK about paying any price to support liberty. Apparently, Kennedy was of the same mindset as pre-Trump Republicans.
And if I remember correctly, the Trump foreign policy team thought Biden bungled the Afghanistan withdrawl.
Oh... Maybe that's why real MAGA Republicans have been kicking their own... The RINO warmonger Gov-Gun Power-Mad crowd is being complete hypocrites to the Republican Platform.
National Defense... Not a Global Police.
Only two kinds of people wear sunglasses inside.
Blind people and assholes.
Joe Biden is not blind.
My vision is augmented.
Humility, not "humbleness" (although my spellchecker came up with humbleness). Zoomer vocab?
I remodeled $seven hundred in line with day the employment of my cell in component time. i latterly got my fifth payroll check of $19632 and every one i accustomed be doing is to duplicate and paste paintings online. this domestic paintings makes American state capable of generate further coins day by day competently simple to try and do paintings and standard earnings from this are simply superb. gd20 Here what i’m doing.
Just open the link————————————–>>OPEN>> https://dailyworls7.blogspot.com/